Dialysis in diabetic patients: hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Pros and cons

Both hemodialysis (HD) as well as peritoneal dialysis (PD), are efficient renal replacement therapies in uremic patients with and without diabetes. PD is less expensive dialysis modality and may provide a survival advantage over hemodialysis in first 2 to 4 years of treatment. Chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) as well as Continuous Cycler-Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis (CCPD) have additional advantages in patients with diabetes. PD therapy will be better tolerated than HD, the blood pressure is more stable and vascular access is not necessary. Preserving residual renal function (RRF) is of paramount importance to prolong the survival outcomes in PD patients. In insulin-dependent diabetic patients intraperitoneal insulin substitution can be used. The development of new, more biocompatible PD solutions holds promise for the future. Nevertheless, in many countries HD is further more favoured in the treatment of patients with ESRD.     

A comparison of reported sleep disorders in patients on chronic hemodialysis and continuous peritoneal dialysis.

There are few data about the prevalence and characteristics of reported sleep disorders in chronic dialysis patients and, although insomnia is often used as a marker of uremia, there are few data relating complaints of sleep to adequacy of dialysis. We therefore surveyed 48 hemodialysis (HD) patients, 22 continuous peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and 41 healthy control subjects about disordered sleep. The questionnaire included demographic data, questions characterizing the reported sleep problems, and linear analogue scales quantitating the severity of the sleep disturbance and feelings of anxiety, worry, and sadness. Kt/V determinations were also made for each dialysis patient. Fifty-two percent of the HD, 50% of the PD, and 12% of the control subjects reported problems sleeping (P less than 0.001, all dialysis patients v controls). No differences between HD and PD in characteristics of sleep problems were seen. Sleep severity scale results confirmed sleep disorders (7.2 in those with v 0.95 in those without sleep disorders, where 0 = sleep a little problem and 10 = a big problem, P less than 0.001). Caffeine intake (P less than 0.05) and worry (P less than 0.004) were the only factors associated with reported sleep disturbances. Kt/V values (1.4 +/- 0.3) did not predict reported sleep problems. Mean reported hours of sleep per night (5.5 +/- 2 v 5.8 +/- 1.4) and desired hours of sleep per night (8.3 +/- 2 v 7.6 +/- 1.3) were similar among dialysis patients and controls reporting sleep problems. Dialysis patients and controls without self-reported sleep disorders slept a mean of 7.1 +/- 2.4 and 7 +/- 1.1 h/night, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Associations of dialysis modality and infectious mortality in incident dialysis patients in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present investigation is to compare rates, types, causes, and timing of infectious death in incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients in Australia and New Zealand. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: The study included all patients starting dialysis therapy between April 1, 1995, and December 31, 2005. PREDICTOR: Dialysis modality. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Rates of and time to infectious death were compared by using Poisson regression, Kaplan-Meier, and competing risks multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses. RESULTS: 21,935 patients started dialysis therapy (first treatment PD, n = 6,020; HD, n = 15,915) during the study period, and 1,163 patients (5.1%) died of infectious causes (PD, 529 patients; 7.6% versus HD, 634 patients; 4.2%). Incidence rates of infectious mortality in PD and HD patients were 2.8 and 1.7/100 patient-years, respectively (incidence rate ratio PD versus HD, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47 to 1.86). After performing competing risks multivariate Cox analyses allowing for an interaction between time on study and modality because of identified nonproportionality of hazards, PD consistently was associated with increased hazard of death from infection compared with HD after 6 months of treatment (<6 months hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.54; 6 months to 2 years HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.59; 2 to 6 years HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.80; >6 years HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.76 to 4.33). This increased risk of infectious death in PD patients was largely accounted for by an increased risk of death caused by bacterial or fungal peritonitis. LIMITATIONS: Patients were not randomly assigned to their initial dialysis modality. Residual confounding and coding bias could not be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis modality selection significantly influences risks, types, causes, and timing of fatal infections experienced by patients with end-stage kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand.     

Perceptions about renal replacement therapy among nephrology professionals

Usage of renal replacement modalities available for the treatment of end stage renal disease varies widely between countries, indicating that non-medical factors contribute to the choice of therapy. In the United States, 93% of the patients are treated with in-center hemodialysis (HD), about 7% undergo peritoneal dialysis (PD) and less than 1% are on home HD. In comparison, a Northern California-based nonprofit dialysis provider with home dialysis centers throughout the United States has achieved a home therapy penetration of 22%, the highest proportion of home therapies among U.S. dialysis providers. To better understand the perceptions about the various modality choices among caretakers (nephrologists and nurses) in this organization a short questionnaire was used. We examined the hypothetical setting of the caretakers being in the patient role. More than 90% of the nephrology professionals chose a home therapy as initial treatment option with close to equal distribution between PD and home HD. This pattern persisted for maintenance therapy with home HD being the preferred modality. Nephrologists' and nurses' perception of who makes modality decisions varied profoundly.     

Influence of dialysis on post-transplant events

INTRODUCTION: We examined the effect of haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) on acute rejection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft and patient survival after cadaveric renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 325 patients (cyclosporin [CyA]-based therapy) who had their first cadaver renal transplant between January 1991 and December 1996 and followed up for a mean of 61 +/- 26 months. They were divided into three groups: HD, PD and CD (where both PD and HD was used for at least 3 months). Delayed graft function was diagnosed if the patient needed dialysis in the first week post-transplant while primary non-function (PNF) was diagnosed if the kidney never achieved function. Graft rejection was confirmed by biopsy; early acute rejection (EAR) was defined as acute rejection occurring before 90 days and late acute rejection (LAR) as one after 90 d. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients had PD, 117 HD and 25 CD. The mean time period in which the patients were on dialysis for PD was 24 months, HD 34.5 months and CD 50.6 months (p < 0.01). The recipients were matched for age and gender. The donor variables (age, gender and cold ischaemia time) did not differ between the groups. The mean time for the development of first acute rejection following renal transplant in each group was as follows: PD group: 68.8 d, HD group: 81.3 d and CD group: 105 d (p = 0.08). The number of patients who developed EAR was 90 (49.2%) in PD group, 51 (43.6%) in HD group and 11 (56%) in CD group (p = 0.6); the number who developed LAR was nine in PD group (4.9%), six in HD group (5.1%) and one in CD group (4%) (p = 0.9). Fifty-six patients with PD had DGF compared with 58 with HD (p = 0.01). There was no difference in the number and severity of rejection episodes or DGF based on the duration of dialysis. The 5-yr survival of patients was 79% for PD, 81% HD and 78% CD groups (p = n.s), while the graft survival for PD group was 61%, HD group 63% and CD group 74% (p = n.s). SUMMARY: We could find no difference in the patient or graft survival between patients who had pre-transplant HD, PD or CD. There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection episodes between the three groups of patients as well. However, we found a significantly higher rate of DGF in the HD versus PD patients.     

Dialysis as bridge therapy for renal transplantation: single center experience, a comparison of hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the most ideal treatment in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the prevalence of transplantation is extremely low and most patients with ESRD should continue dialysis for their whole life. Recently, high transposition rate of renal transplantation from peritoneal dialysis (PD) was reported, however, it was unclear whether a difference in dialytic modality can influence the outcome. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of dialytic modality on the rate of kidney transplantation and outcome in our single center. METHODS: Forty-two kidney transplants were carried among 1,573 dialysis patients from the years 1986 to 2004 in our center. Transposition rates from two modalities (HD and PD) and graft survival were compared. The incidence of acute rejection episode, complications after receiving transplantations, and coexisting diseases were also evaluated between the two modalities prior to transplantation. RESULT: The number of patients who received HD was larger than PD (HD 77.1%, PD 22.9%, respectively). Forty-two patients undergoing dialytic therapy received a living-donor kidney transplantation. Overall graft survival was 92% at 5 years and 75% at 10 years. Among these cases, dialytic modality prior to transplantation was 57.1% in HD, and 42.9% in PD. The transfer rate from PD to transplantation was significantly (p = 0.0036) higher (4.7%) than that of HD (1.9%). The reason for the high transfer rate of PD patients might be cooperation with their family and the provision of relevant information by nephrologists during PD. There were no differences between the two modalities prior to transplantation in the graft survival rate, incidence of acute rejection, and complications before and after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Difference in pretransplant dialysis modality did not affect the outcomes, however, the transfer rate from PD was significantly higher than from HD. Accordingly, PD is useful compared to HD as bridge therapy for kidney transplantation from the high feasibility of living-donor kidney transplantation.     

The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting--a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The UK National Health Service (NHS) will fund renal services using Payment by Results (PbR), from 2009. Central to the success of PbR will be the creation of tariffs that reflect the true cost of medical services. We have therefore estimated the cost of different dialysis modalities in the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust and six other hospitals in the UK. METHODS: We used semi-structured interviews with nephrologists, head nurses and business managers to identify the steps involved in delivering the different dialysis modalities. We assigned costs to these using published figures or suppliers' published price lists. The study used mixed costing methods. Dialysis costs were estimated by a combination of microcosting and a top-down approach. Where we did not have access to detailed accounts, we applied values for Cardiff. RESULTS: The most efficient modalities were automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), the mean annual costs of which were pound21 655 and pound15 570, respectively. Hospital-based haemodialysis (HD) cost pound35 023 per annum and satellite-unit-based HD cost pound32 669. The cost of home-based HD was pound20 764 per year (based on data from only one unit). The main cost drivers for PD were the costs of solutions and management of anaemia. For HD they were costs of disposables, nursing, the overheads associated with running the unit and management of anaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Renal tariffs for PbR need to reflect the true cost of dialysis provision if choices about modalities are not to be influenced by erroneous estimates of cost. Knowledge of the true costs of modalities will also maximize the number of established renal failure patients treated by dialysis within the limited funds available from the NHS.     

Clearance and removal of oxalate in children on intensified dialysis for primary hyperoxaluria type 1

Patients with end-stage renal failure owing to primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) receive dialysis while waiting for transplantation. So far, dialysis has not been shown to overcome the problem of ongoing oxalate production and deposition at extrarenal sites. We report on six children with PH1 who had to be dialyzed for a median period of 2.5 years while awaiting liver transplantation. Aiming at preventing oxalate tissue accretion, oxalate mass transfer was studied and dialysis intensified accordingly. Mean plasma oxalate concentration was between 51 and 137 micromol/l. In three of the six patients with a urinary output between 630 and 3140 ml, urinary removal of oxalate was between 5.6 and 12.4 mmol/week/1.73 m2. Hemodialysis (HD) in five of the six patients demonstrated a mean oxalate dialysance between 158 and 444 l/week/1.73 m2. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) in two of the six patients showed mean oxalate clearances of 66 and 103 l/week/1.73 m2. One patient received HD and PD. By adding all modes of elimination, a mean total oxalate mass between 10.1 and 24.1 mmol/week/1.73 m2 was removed. Dialysis is still necessary as a temporary therapy for a number of patients with PH1. Dialysis should be instituted pre-emptively and maximally exploited by intensified HD/PD treatment protocols, without, however, cutting back urinary output.     

Increased incidence of postoperative infections associated with peritoneal dialysis in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Infection is a frequent postoperative complication in renal transplant recipients. However, little information is available concerning the effect of pretransplantation dialysis modality on posttransplantation complications including infection. We therefore evaluated the effect of hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD) on the incidence of postoperative infection as well as several other posttransplantation outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records covering the period 30 days after transplantation of 156 dialysis patients who underwent renal transplantation at a single center during a 22-month period. Of these patients, 103 received only HD, 32 received only PD, 13 received PD in the past and HD immediately before transplantation (PH/HD), and 8 received HD in the past and PD immediately before transplantation (HD/PD). The presence of culture-proven infection, types of infecting organisms, length of initial hospital stay, and incidence of rejection during the first 30 days after transplantation were determined for each patient. RESULTS: All groups were similar with regard to age, race, gender, underlying disease, donor type, incidence of delayed graft function, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. There were more infectious complications within 30 days after transplantation in patients on PD just prior to transplantation (PD and HD/PD) than in HD patients (67.5% vs. 25.9%, P<0.00001). When types of infectious organisms were assessed, PD patients were found to have a greater incidence of infections with microorganisms that colonize human skin (P<0.0001). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days longer for PD patients and 6.5 days longer for HD/PD patients than for patients receiving HD (P=0.01 and 0.04), and PD and HD/PD patients were more likely to have an episode of rejection than HD patients (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Renal replacement therapy with PD immediately before transplantation negatively affects outcome as compared with HD, predisposing patients to a greater incidence of postoperative infections and rejection and a longer hospital stay. Further study in a randomized controlled trial may help determine how adjustment of the dialysis method can optimize transplantation outcome.     

Dyspepsia and gastroparesis in chronic renal failure: the role of Helicobacter pylori

AIMS: Many patients with chronic renal failure have dyspeptic symptoms. In the present study, we assessed the Helicobacter pylori (Hp) status, dyspeptic symptoms and gastric emptying rates in uremic patients. The present study was undertaken to compare chronic renal failure patients not under dialysis therapy (predialysis), hemodialysis (HD) patients and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients for these variables and to search for a possible causative role of Hp. METHODS: We used a standardized questionnaire to assess dyspeptic symptoms. Gastric emptying rates were determined by the 13C-octanoic acid breath test. HD patients were examined outside a dialysis session, PD patients were examined with a "full" abdomen. Specific Helicobacter pylori IgG was measured by a second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Sixty-six HD patients. 58 predialytic patients and 28 PD patients were included. Prevalences of Hp infection were highest in HD patients (46.2%) and predialysis patients (42.3%) compared to PD patients (28.6%) (p < 0.02). On the contrary, the prevalence of dysmotility-like dyspepsia was higher in PD patients (67.9%) when compared to HD patients (33.3%) (p < 0.01) and predialytic patients (53.6%) (difference not significant). Neither dyspepsia nor delayed gastric emptying were related to the presence of Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies. CONCLUSION: A positive Helicobacter status based on serology was not related to the presence of dyspepsia or gastroparesis in uremic patients, whether on dialysis therapy or not. Dyspeptic complaints as well as gastroparesis are most prevalent in patients on peritoneal dialysis. The physiopathological mechanisms and clinical impact of these findings merit further investigation.     

Malaysian Dialysis and Transplant Registry Report

SUMMARY: This report summarizes data for dialysis and transplant patients up to the end of 1995. We estimate coverage to be about 30% of dialysis patients and near complete ascertainment of transplant patients. On the 31 December 1995, there were 2224 patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), comprising 50% on haemodialysis (HD), 12% on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 38% with functioning transplants. the prevalence rate for dialysis was 68 per million population (p.m.p.) and that of transplant 42 p.m.p. the new dialysis acceptance rate was 15 p.m.p. and transplant 5 p.m.p. Forty-seven per cent of new patients had unknown primary renal disease and 30% was due to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Mean age of prevalent HD patients was 42 years, CAPD 46 years and 34 years for transplant. Patient survival on CAPD was 85% at 1 year and for HD was 88%. One year transplant patient survival was 94% and graft survival 91%.     

Malaysian Dialysis and Transplant Registry Report

This report summarizes data for dialysis and transplant patients up to the end of 1995. We estimate coverage to be about 30% of dialysis patients and near complete ascertainment of transplant patients. On the 31 December 1995, there were 2224 patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), comprising 50% on haemodialysis (HD), 12% on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 38% with functioning transplants. The prevalence rate for dialysis was 68 per million population (p.m.p.) and that of transplant 42 p.m.p. The new dialysis acceptance rate was 15 p.m.p. and transplant 5 p.m.p. Forty-seven per cent of new patients had unknown primary renal disease and 30% was due to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Mean age of prevalent HD patients was 42 years, CAPD 46 years and 34 years for transplant. Patient survival on CAPD was 85% at 1 year and for HD was 88%. One year transplant patient survival was 94% and graft survival 91%.     

Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists towards dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis demographics are changing around the world. Within the UK a striking decrease in the overall use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been noted. We set out to determine the opinions and attitudes of British Isles nephrologists about dialysis modality decisions and optimal dialysis system design. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was mailed to a random selection of members of the Renal Association of Great Britain and Ireland. RESULTS: A 63% response rate was achieved. Decisions about dialysis modality were based mostly on patient preference (mean score 4.4 on a scale of 1-5), quality of life data (mean score 3.8), and morbidity and mortality data (mean scores for both 3.6). The least important factors when choosing the modality of dialysis care were the treatment costs to either the patient or the health care system. Respondents felt that both PD and hospital-based haemodialysis (HD) were over-utilized in today's practice. They suggested that an 'ideal dialysis system' (based on patient survival, wellness, and quality of life) should have 27% of patients dialysed using hospital-based HD, 24% in a satellite unit, 11% dialysed using home HD, and 38% on some form of PD (19, 16, and 3% for CAPD, automated PD and intermittent PD, respectively). Few differences were identified between an ideal system which optimized patient survival, wellness, and quality of life, compared with one which optimized cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: This survey suggests that most nephrologists in the British Isles feel that hospital-based HD and CAPD are being currently overused, and that future dialysis planning should include a higher proportion of patients on satellite dialysis, home HD, and automated PD to optimize both dialysis cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes.     

End stage renal disease in Brunei Darussalam – report from the first Brunei Dialysis Transplant Registry (BDTR)

Abstract

The Brunei Dialysis and Transplant Registry (BDTR) was established in 2011 to collect data from patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Brunei Darussalam. The chief aims of the registry are to obtain general demographic data for RRT patients and to determine disease burden attributable to End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). The registry population comprises of all ESRD patients treated in Brunei Darussalam. Data domains include general demographic data, medical history, ESRD etiological causes, laboratory investigations, dialysis treatment and outcomes. There were 545 prevalent RRT patients in Brunei at the end of 2011. The incidence and prevalence of ESRD were 265 and 1250 per million population. Hemodialysis (HD), Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) and Transplant comprised of 83%, 11% and 6% of the RRT population, respectively. Diabetes mellitus accounted for 57% of all new incident cases. The mean serum hemoglobin, phosphate, calcium and iPTH were 11.0?±?1.6?g/dL, 1.9?±?0.5?mmol/L, 2.3?±?0.2?mmol/L and 202.5?±?323.4?ng/mL. Dialysis adequacy for HD and PD were 65.1 (urea reduction ratio) and 2.0?±?0.3 (Kt/v). 71 % of all prevalent HD had functioning AV fistulae and the peritonitis incidence was one in 24.5 patient-month/episode. The first BDTR has identified some deficiencies in the renal services in Brunei. However, it signals an important milestone for the establishment of benchmarked renal practice in the country. We hoped to maintain and improve our registry for years to come and will strive to align our standards to acceptable international practice.     

Survival advantage of hemodialysis relative to peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease and congestive heart failure

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been proposed as a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease and associated congestive heart failure (CHF). Here, we compare mortality risks in these patients by dialysis modality by including all patients who started planned chronic dialysis with associated congestive heart failure and were prospectively enrolled in the French REIN Registry. Survival was compared between 933 PD and 3468 hemodialysis (HD) patients using a Kaplan-Meier model, Cox regression, and propensity score analysis. The patients were followed from their first dialysis session and stratified by modality at day 90 or last modality if death occurred prior. There was a significant difference in the median survival time of 20.4 months in the PD group and 36.7 months in the HD group (hazard ratio, 1.55). After correction for confounders, the adjusted hazard ratio for death in PD compared to the HD patients remained significant at 1.48. Subgroup analyses showed that the results were not changed with regard to the New York Heart Association stage, age strata, or estimated glomerular filtration rate strata at first renal replacement therapy. The use of propensity score did not change results (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.55). Thus, mortality risk was higher with PD than with HD among incident patients with end-stage renal disease and congestive heart failure. These results may help guide clinical decisions and also highlight the need for randomized clinical trials.     

Platelet activity and serum homocysteine levels in patients with end-stage renal failure with regard to dialysis modality

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the activation of platelets and their interaction with circulating cells are important independent risk factors for atherosclerosis. In non-uremic patients with symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, a relationship between serum homocysteine (Hcy) levels and platelet activity had been reported. The purposes of this study were to evaluate of effects of dialysis modality on platelet activity in patients with end-stage renal failure and to investigate the relationship between platelet activity, Hcy, and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In age and sex matched 19 healthy subjects, 20 hemodialysis (HD) patients, and 18 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, the expression of platelet surface receptors CD41, CD61, CD42a, and CD62P were investigated. CD62P expression was statistically significantly increased in HD patients compared with CAPD patients and controls (34.4 +/- 22.5%; 17.3 +/- 19.6%, 12.0 +/- 15.6%, respectively, p < 0.05), but not in CAPD patients compared with controls. There was a positive correlation between CD62 expression and duration of dialysis in HD patients (r = 0.498, p = 0.026). Mean plasma Hcy levels in dialysis patients were higher than reference levels. However, we could not find any relationship between CD62 expression, Hcy, and LVH in both groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis (PD) have a different impact on the expression of CD62: peritoneal dialysis seems to have a more favorable effect. It may be possible that the differences in biocompatibility between PD and HD potentially contribute to differences in CD62 expression.     

Plasma ghrelin levels in patients undergoing haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin has been characterized as a relevant physiologic regulator of appetite and body weight in humans. However, the potential relationships between ghrelin levels, inflammation and malnutrition in dialysis patients have not been adequately studied. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design to study 20 haemodialysis (HD) and 21 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and compared their plasma ghrelin (PGhr) levels with that of an age-matched control group. We also explored correlations between ghrelin and selected hormonal, renal adequacy, nutritional and inflammation markers in both groups. RESULTS: PGhr levels were higher in HD (median 119.8 pg/ml, range 71.1-333.7, P = 0.001) and PD (99.3, range 45.8-578.5, P = 0.045) patients than in healthy controls (78, range 29-158) (HD vs PD, not significant). Ghrelin levels were strongly and inversely correlated with age (r = -0.46, P = 0.02 for patients; r = -0.61, P = 0.001 for controls). Except for a positive correlation between ghrelin and growth hormone (r = 0.48, P = 0.002), univariate analysis failed to detect associations between PGhr and the measured hormonal values, renal adequacy, nutritional indicators and markers of inflammation. However, multivariate analysis revealed significant inverse correlations between PGhr levels and nutritional markers, including subjective global assessment (P = 0.013), albumin (P = 0.001), transferrin (P = 0.01) and protein nitrogen appearance (as an estimate of protein intake) (P = 0.035), after controlling for the confounding effect of age. CONCLUSIONS: PGhr levels were moderately and similarly increased in patients undergoing HD and PD. Age was a strong determinant of PGhr levels, both in uraemic patients and in healthy controls. Dialysis adequacy, residual renal function and inflammation did not appear to influence ghrelin levels in these patients. The negative correlation between PGhr and nutritional markers suggests that low dietary intake causes increases in ghrelin secretion in dialysis patients.     

Residual renal function: considerations on its importance and preservation in dialysis patients

Residual renal function (RRF) remains important even after commencement of dialysis. Its role in the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is well recognized and is increasingly utilized in incremental PD regimes, but it is also vitally important in hemodialysis (HD) patients, in whom it, as in PD patients, may improve survival. It may allow for a reduction in the duration of HD sessions. It reduces the need for dietary and fluid restrictions in both PD and HD patients. Other contributions include improved middle molecule clearance, better hemoglobin, phosphate, potassium, and urate levels, enhanced nutritional status and quality of life scores, and better outcomes in pregnancy. On the negative side, hypoalbuminemia may be prolonged in patients with persistent nephrotic-range proteinuria. Contrary to popular belief, RRF does not necessarily decline rapidly with the initiation of HD. PD may be better than HD in preserving RRF, although this difference may not persist if biocompatible membranes, bicarbonate buffer, and ultrapure water are used. Nocturnal ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients may fare worse than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. RRF can be adversely affected by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aminoglycosides, and radiocontrast agents. Diuretics can help maintain fluid balance but not RRF.     

Stimulated IFNgamma and IL-10 secretion of blood mononuclear cells in patients on renal replacement therapies show different secretion patterns

Infection is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although the role of the immune system is of great importance, little is known about the influence of the mode of RRT to the preferential excretions of regulator cytokines of mononuclear cells. Therefore, we investigated the stimulated IFNgamma (Th1) and IL-10 (Th2) secretions of mononuclear cells from patients on RRT. Blood was drawn from 10 controls, 15 patients on hemodialysis (HD), 15 on peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 10 after kidney transplantation (Tx). The cells were separated, and phytohemagglutinine (PHA) was added for stimulation. After 0, 6, and 24 h, IFNgamma and IL-10 (pg/ml) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IFNgamma secretion was significantly enhanced 6 (p < 0.001) and 24 h (p = 0.002) after stimulation in all groups (in mean +/- SEM). The analysis of the subgroups 6 h after adding PHA showed significant differences (p = 0.0239) with the lowest IFNgamma in Tx (16 +/- 5) and the highest in PD (79 +/- 30). For IL-10, secretion was enhanced in all groups 6 h after stimulation (p < 0.0116). The lowest secretions were seen in HD (18 +/- 8) and controls (27 +/- 9); the highest secretions were in Tx (98 +/- 20) and PD (57 +/- 12). The differences between HD and Tx (p < 0.01) and HD versus PD (p = 0.05) were significant. The stimulated cytokine secretion of blood mononuclear cells is preserved with RRT. The modes of RRT could influence the pattern of cytokine secretion. Surprisingly, the cells from patients on PD showed enhanced IL-10 secretion compared to HD. Presumably, this is due to the chronic contact of peritoneal dialysis fluids with monocytes and the lymphatic system in PD.     

Long term peritoneal dialysis--is it a reality?

The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has increased dramatically over the last two decades since the introduction of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). With this has also been the improvement in outcomes. In the medium term (up to five years), there is no difference in patient survival when CAPD is compared with hemodialysis (HD); PD technique survival is also improving, though is somewhat less than on HD. Problem areas for PD appear to be peritoneal membrane related changes, residual function, and peritonitis and these would need to be impacted on to improve outcome and long-term survival on PD. Current data would suggest that not many patients continue on peritoneal dialysis beyond ten years. However there are developments which show promise and are likely to enhance the outcome. It is possible to maximise renal replacement therapy by using peritoneal dialysis as the initial therapy. Arguments that favour this are discussed.