Should β Blockers No Longer Be Considered First-line Therapy for the Treatment of Essential Hypertension Without Comorbidities?

Although most guidelines committees historically recommended initial diuretics and/or β blockers for uncomplicated hypertension, clinical trial outcomes analyzed in the last 5 to 7 years have been suboptimal with atenolol, the world’s most popular β blocker. Several meta-analyses have suggested that despite lowering blood pressure, any and all β blockers inadequately protect hypertensive patients from cardiovascular events. These phenomena have been attributed to ineffective lowering of central aortic or inter-visit blood pressures, or adverse metabolic effects (particularly when combined with diuretics). Although there has never been a head-to-head comparison of atenolol with any other β blocker in hypertensive patients, indirect comparisons can be done with network and Bayesian meta-analyses, which suggest that heterogeneity of β-blockers’ pharmacology also extends to outcomes. Although once-daily atenolol as initial antihypertensive therapy may be unwise, whether initial β blockers newer than atenolol reduce cardiovascular risk to the same extent as other antihypertensive drugs should be answered with more clinical trials.     

Is the β thalassaemia trait of clinical importance?

Although the beta thalassaemia trait affects millions of people worldwide, there have been no controlled studies to determine whether it is associated with any clinical disability or abnormal physical signs. To address this question, 402 individuals were studied: 217 with beta thalassaemia trait, of whom 154 were aware of the diagnosis and 63 were unaware until after the completion of the study; 89 normal controls; and 96 controls with mild hypochromic anaemia. There was a significant increase in symptoms ascribable to anaemia and episodes of pyrexia in those with the beta thalassaemia trait that were not influenced by prior knowledge that they had this condition. There was no difference in physical findings, notably splenomegaly, between those with beta thalassaemia trait and either control group.     

β‐Blockers and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Inappropriate Avoidance?

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States and is often accompanied by one or more comorbid conditions. While there are established morbidity and mortality benefits of β‐blocker (BB) use for certain cardiovascular conditions, data suggest that clinicians are often reluctant to prescribe them in the presence of COPD because of concerns for bronchoconstriction, despite evidence that they are typically well‐tolerated among these patients. Treatment guidelines for COPD are consistent with those for cardiovascular disease management and support the role of BBs in management of particular cardiovascular conditions, even in the presence of severe COPD. Adherence to these guidelines could result in significant decreases in morbidity and mortality among patients with COPD. Additionally, current treatments for COPD are often linked to increased cardiovascular disease events. Further study is needed to clarify and guide therapeutic management in patients with COPD.     

ACE Inhibitor‐Related Angioedema: Can Angiotensin‐Receptor Blockers Be Safely Used?

Angioedema is a well-recognized side effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy. Angioedema can also be seen with angiotensin receptor blocker therapy but much less frequently than is the case with ACE inhibitors. For unclear reasons, ACE inhibitor-related angioedema occurs more commonly in black patients. Angioedema can be life threatening but more times than not its occurrence can be managed with conservative treatment measures including discontinuation of the medication and/or administration of an antihistamine. Occasionally, epinephrine and/or steroid therapy may be warranted. In a patient having experienced ACE inhibitor-related angioedema, angiotensin receptor blockers should be used cautiously if at all. If angiotensin receptor blocker therapy is being considered in a patient with prior ACE inhibitor-related angioedema there should be some justification for the use. Such justification might include the presence of heart failure or proteinuric nephropathic states among other considerations.     

How Does Renal Denervation Lower Blood Pressure and When Should This Technique Be Considered for the Treatment of Hypertension?

Hypertensive pregnancy disorders (HPD) are important causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In addition, a history of HPD has been associated with an increased risk for maternal cardiovascular disease later in life, possibly because of irreversible vascular and metabolic changes that persist beyond the affected pregnancies. Therefore, treatment of HPD may not only improve immediate pregnancy outcomes, but also maternal long-term cardiovascular health. Unlike the recommendations for hypertension treatment in the general population, treatment recommendations for HPD have not changed substantially for more than 2 decades. This is particularly true for mild to moderate hypertension in pregnancy, defined as a blood pressure of 140–159/90–109 mm Hg. This review focuses on the goals of therapy, treatment strategies, and new developments in the field of HPD that should be taken into account when considering blood pressure targets and pharmacologic options for treatment of hypertension in pregnant women.