Expression of cytokeratin markers, ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with co-existing invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast

Previously, we showed that pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast can be divided into 3 subtypes (luminal, basal/stem, and null) based on the expression of 5 cytokeratin (CK) markers: CK5/6, CK14, CK17 (stem/basal), and CK8, CK18 (luminal). The distributions of CK subtypes were associated with nuclear grade and differential expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha), progesterone receptor (PR), HER-2/neu, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In this study, we further explore the expression patterns of CK markers, ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of 99 cases of pure DCIS and 96 cases of DCIS with co-existing invasive ductal carcinoma (DCIS/IDC). We show that between high-grade DCIS and DCIS/IDC, there are differential expression patterns for ER-alpha, PR, and EGFR in corresponding CK subtypes, suggesting that at least some pure DCIS is molecularly distinct from DCIS/IDC. In most cases there is a high degree of co-expression of these markers between DCIS and the co-existing IDC, suggesting that DCIS is frequently a precursor lesion for co-existing IDC. The rate of discordant expression of these markers is low and is more frequently associated with high-grade carcinoma, suggesting that other molecular pathways also may also be present. There are significant differences in the expression of these molecular markers between high-grade and non-high-grade carcinomas, supporting the view that high-grade and non-high-grade carcinomas of the breast are molecularly distinct entities.     

Expression patterns of ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR in different cell origin subtypes of high grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ

We have previously reported that high grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast can be subdivided into 3 cell origin subtypes (luminal, basal/stem, and null), and that high grade DCIS is more frequently associated with basal/stem cell subtypes compared to non-high grade DCIS. Here we refine the relationships between these 3 subtypes and the expression patterns of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha), progesterone receptor (PR), HER-2/neu, and epidermal growth factor receptor (ERFR) in 53 cases of non-high grade and 46 cases of high nuclear grade DCIS. Using a panel of antibodies to ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR, along with cytokeratin (CK) markers (CK5/6, CK8, CK14, CK17, and CK18), we found that all 3 cell origin subtypes can express ER-alpha and PR, and their expression is higher in non-high grade DCIS than in high grade DCIS; the expression of HER-2/neu is associated with luminal subtype only in non-high grade DCIS, but can be seen in all 3 subtypes in high grade DCIS; the expression of EGFR is low and is present only in luminal cell subtypes in both high and non-high grade DCIS. Basal/ stem cell and null cell subtypes occur in younger patients in non-high grade DCIS compared to high grade DCIS. In conclusion, the expression patterns of ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR are markedly different in different cell origin subtypes of both high grade and non-high grade DCIS, suggesting that cell origin subtypes as well as nuclear grade contribute to the biological and molecular heterogeneity of DCIS.     

Loss of bcl-2 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast relates to poor histological differentiation and to expression of p53 and c-erbB-2 proteins

Aim : This study (1) investigates the incidence of bcl-2 protein expression in a series of 108 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), including 25 with early invasive carcinoma, and (2) evaluates the relationship of bcl-2 expression to the histological grade of DCIS and to the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), c-erbB-2 and p53 proteins.  

Methods and results

The expression of bcl-2, oestrogen receptor (ER), c-erbB-2 and p53 proteins was determined immunohistochemically. Cases were regarded as positive for individual antibodies when at least 10% of the DCIS cells showed positive staining. DCIS was graded histologically as well ( n  = 9), intermediately ( n  = 24), or poorly differentiated ( n  = 75). bcl-2 expression was documented in 57 cases (53%) and was strongly associated with the histological grade of DCIS ( P  < 0.0001). All cases of well-differentiated DCIS were bcl-2 positive and loss of bcl-2 expression was almost exclusively confined to poorly differentiated DCIS lesions. bcl-2 expression was also closely associated with positive ER status ( P  < 0.0001). Forty-seven of 57 (82%) bcl-2 positive cases were ER positive while 49/51 (96%) bcl-2 negative cases were ER negative. There was a significant inverse correlation between bcl-2 expression and both p53 protein expression ( P  = 0.0004) and c-erbB-2 expression ( P  < 0.0001). Nineteen of 24 (79%) p53 positive cases and 38/45 (84%) c-erbB-2 positive cases showed loss of bcl-2.  

Conclusions

Loss of bcl-2 expression occurs in poorly differentiated DCIS and is related to negative ER status and to positive p53 and c-erbB-2 status. This pattern of bcl-2 expression and its association with other biological markers in DCIS is similar to that reported in invasive breast carcinoma.     

Are bilateral breast cancers and breast cancers coexisting with ovarian cancer different from solitary tumors? A pair‐matched immunohistochemical analysis aimed at intrinsic tumor phenotype

Patients with bilateral breast cancer (BBC) and breast‐ovarian cancer syndrome (BOCS) constitute populations potentially enriched for molecular defects involved in the pathomechanisms of these malignancies. The aim of our study was to compare tumor morphology and expression of estrogen and progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki67, cytokeratin 5/6, E‐cadherin, vimentin and epidermal growth factor receptor in tissue microarrays from 199 tumors from BBC or BOCS patients and 199 age‐matched solitary tumors. Compared to controls, BBC and BOCS considered jointly had lower incidence of DCIS, lower expression of PgR and HER2, and higher expression of Ki67 and vimentin. BOCS tumors were of higher grade, had lower expression of ER and PgR and higher expression of Ki67, CK5/6, vimentin and EGFR. BBC had less DCIS component, lower HER2 expression and higher Ki67 expression. Metachronous BBC (mBBC) had lower expression of ER, PgR and HER2, and higher expression of Ki67 and vimentin. Synchronous BBC (sBBC) had less DCIS component, higher expression of ER, and lower expression of CK5/6, EGFR and E‐cadherin. BBC and breast cancers in BOCS differ in many aspects from solitary tumors. BBC are a heterogeneous group of tumors, differing between sBBC and mBBC. mBBC phenotype shares many features with BOCS tumors.     

Relationship between nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ and cell origin markers

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a group of heterogeneous lesions genetically, morphologically, and biologically. Recently, breast epithelium in the terminal ductal lobular unit has been sub-classified based on the expression of several cytokeratin markers as stem cells (CK5/6 +), luminal cells (CK8, CK18 +), and basal cells (CK14, CK17 +). In this study we describe the relationship between DCIS of different nuclear grades (non-high grade and high grade) and these cell origin markers. Fifty-three cases of non-high grade and 46 cases of high grade DCIS were selected, and representative sections from each case were stained with antibodies to these cytokeratin markers. High grade DCIS showed significantly higher rates of expression with stem and basal cell markers compared with non-high grade DCIS (p <0.05). The majority of DCIS, both high grade and non-high grade, expressed luminal cell markers (67% to 91%) and single type of cell origin marker (72% to 87%). High-grade DCIS more frequently co-expressed all three types of cell origin markers compared with non-high grade DCIS (p <0.05). In summary, a subset of high grade DCIS frequently rises from stem or/and basal cell populations; the subset is associated with poor prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. Thus, these markers may be used to identify a potentially more aggressive subgroup of breast carcinoma at its pre-invasive stage (DCIS), and to manage it accordingly. Second, most DCIS express luminal cell markers, suggesting that malignant transformation occurs relatively late along the cell differentiation pathway, contrary to the traditional belief that most neoplasms arise from a more primitive stem cell population. Third, the majority of DCIS exclusively express one type of progenitor marker, indicating that in most incidences they may arise from a single progenitor population. Last, triple expression of all types of cell origin marker is frequently associated with high grade DCIS, suggesting that more complicated pathways are involved in these more aggressive lesions. Further studies are needed to delineate the relationships of cell origin markers in DCIS and invasive carcinoma to the clinical outcome.     

Mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 may not play an essential role in breast carcinogenesis

Breast carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies in women, and its carcinogenesis is still unknown. The role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in breast carcinogenesis has been inconsistent in the literature. Here we studied the expression of 2 mismatch repair genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, in 211 cases of intraductal (DCIS; 90 cases) and invasive ductal carcinoma (121 cases) of the breast by immunohistochemical analysis; and evaluated its relationship with cytokeratin (CK) subtypes, along with expression of ER-alpha (138 cases positive, 73 cases negative); PR (118 cases positive, 93 cases negative), and HER-2/neu (47 cases positive, 164 cases negative); and clinical features such as patient age (157 cases>50 years, 54 cases<50 years), tumor size (31 cases of IDC>2 cm, 90 cases of IDC<2 cm), tumor grade (87 cases high nuclear grade, 124 case non-high grade), and lymph node metastasis (38 cases of IDC positive, 74 cases of IDC negative, 9 cases of IDC with no available data on lymph node status). For CK subtypes, 167 cases were classified as luminal subtype (expressing CK8 and/or CK18, negative for CK5/6, CK14, and CK17) and 44 cases were classified as nonluminal (most of them belonged to basal/stem subtype, expressing CK5/6, and/or CK14, and/or CK17). No typical or atypical medullary carcinoma was included in this study. Our results showed that no loss of nuclear expression of either hMLH1 or hMSH2 was identified in any of the 211 cases of DCIS or IDC regardless of the various pathological and clinical factors, suggesting that hMLH1 or hMSH2 may not play an essential role in the majority of cases of the breast carcinoma.     

CD109 expression in basal-like breast carcinoma

Breast cancer can be classified into several subtypes based on gene expression profiling. Basal-like breast carcinoma (BLC) has a triple negative phenotype, that is, the subtype lacks the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It has been recently reported that CD109, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell surface protein, is a new breast myoepithelial marker. In the present study CD109 expression was investigated in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of the breast on immunohistochemistry. Eighty-eight formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma sections were immunostained with anti-CD109, anti-cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), anti-calponin, anti-vimentin and anti-p63 antibodies. CD109 expression was detected in 18 of 30 basal-like breast carcinomas (BLC) but not in other types of 53 IDC (non-BLC) that were positive for ER, PgR and/or HER2. The percentage of CD109-positive tissues (60%) in BLC was similar to that of CK5/6 (63%) and higher than that of other myoepithelial markers including p63 (23%), calponin (33%) and vimentin (33%). Statistical analysis indicated that the CD109-positive group in BLC, but not the CK5/6-positive group in BLC, was associated with reduced fat invasion ( P  < 0.05). These findings indicate that CD109 is a useful diagnostic marker for BLC and that CD109 expression may affect biological properties of cancer cells.     

P-cadherin and cytokeratin 5: useful adjunct markers to distinguish basal-like ductal carcinomas in situ

Gene expression profiles of invasive breast carcinomas have identified a subgroup of tumours with worse prognosis, which have been called "basal-like". These are characterized by a specific pattern of expression, being estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 negative, and frequently expressing at least one basal marker such as basal cytokeratins or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Previously, our group characterized basal-like tumours in a series of invasive breast carcinomas using P-cadherin (P-CD), p63 and cytokeratin 5 (CK5). Based on that study, we hypothesized that those high-grade basal-like invasive carcinomas might have a pre-invasive counterpart, which could be identified using the same approach. A series of 79 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) were classified into distinct subgroups according to their ER, HER2 and basal markers expression. Luminal DCIS expressed ER and constituted 64.6% of the series; the HER2 overexpressing tumours did not express ER and represented 25.3% of the cases, whereas 10.1% lack the expression of ER and HER2 and expressed at least one basal marker (P-CD, CK5, CK14, p63, vimentin and/or EGFR). These basal-like DCIS were mostly high-grade, with comedo-type necrosis, and consistently showed expression of P-CD and CK5. In conclusion, DCIS with a basal-like phenotype represent a small percentage in our series, being P-CD and CK5, the most useful adjunct markers to distinguish this subset of carcinomas in situ of the breast.     

Vimentin and laminin expression is associated with basal-like phenotype in both sporadic and BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas

AIMS: To determine whether basal-like phenotype and vimentin and/or laminin are related in both sporadic/familial (BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated) tumours. METHODS: 230 non-familial and 28 hereditary node-negative invasive breast carcinomas were immunohistochemically analysed for oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), Ki67, p53, vimentin and laminin, using tissue microarrays. Tumours were considered to have basal-like phenotype if they were ER negative and HER2 negative, but positive for CK5/6 and/or EGFR. RESULTS: In sporadic tumours, vimentin expression was found in 77.8% cases with basal-like phenotype and 15.5% of non-basal cases (p<0.001). In familial cases, vimentin was expressed in 83.3% basal-like cancers and 16.7% of non-basal tumours (p<0.001). Vimentin expression was more frequent in BRCA1 than BRCA2 mutation carriers. Vimentin expressing tumours were associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.012) among patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and showed a trend for local recurrence or visceral but not bone metastasis (p = 0.021). Laminin expression was also related to basal-like phenotype in both sporadic/familial cases (p<0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively), but neither with prognosis nor recurrence pattern in sporadic cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Vimentin and laminin expression is associated with basal-like phenotype in breast cancer. Expression of vimentin and laminin is characteristic of BRCA1 associated tumours. Since vimentin and laminin staining is widely used by pathologists for diagnostic purposes, thus demonstrating the robustness of their specific antibodies, the immunohistochemical evaluation of these two molecules could be used in identification of basal-like breast tumours in both sporadic/familial cases.     

Central granular cell odontogenic tumor: a histopathologic and immunohistochemical study

The central granular cell odontogenic tumor (CGCOT) is a rare lesion that usually affects the posterior region of the mandible of young adults. We present a case of CGCOT involving the mandible of a 20-year-old white woman, emphasizing the immunohistochemical characteristics using a large panel of antibodies. The lesion was removed surgically, and after 4 years of follow-up, there are no evidences of recurrences. The odontogenic epithelium (OE) showed positivity for cytokeratins (CKs) AE1/AE3, 34βE12, CK5, CK7, CK8, CK14, CK19, E-cadherin, β-catenin, CD138, and p63. The granular cells were positive for vimentin, CD68, lysozyme, muscle-specific actin, α-smooth muscle actin, calponin, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), CD138, and bcl-2. Dendritic-like cells surrounding the OE displayed positivity for vimentin, CD1a, S100, CD68, and bcl-2, but it was negative for factor XIIIa, supporting a Langerhans cell phenotype. Ki-67 labeling index was 1.8%, whereas p53 was negative. These data confirm the benign nature of CGCOT, the association of OE with Langerhans cells, and a variable phenotype of the granular cells.     

Micropapillary carcinoma of the breast with necrosis-like cell death: a case report

A primary invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast in a 46-year-old woman is reported. Histologically, it was composed predominantly of papillary tumor cell clusters without fibrovascular cores, surrounded by a clear space. Tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin (CK) 7, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR), but negative for p53, CK 20, CD34, c-Erb-B2, CK5, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vimentin, and c-kit. MUC1 expression was found at the reversed apical membrane of neoplastic cell clusters. Accordingly, electron microscopy showed the lack of basement membrane and presence of microvilli at the basal surface of the tumor cells. Moreover, ultrastructural examination revealed single tumor cell death characterized by patchy condensations of chromatin throughout the nucleus. These nuclear alterations were associated with the occurrence of empty cytoplasmic vacuoles, conferring a necrosis-like phenotype to this cell death. Alternative programmed cell deaths are reviewed and their morphologic distinction is discussed.     

Similarity in expression of cell cycle proteins between in situ and invasive ductal breast lesions of same differentiation grade.

There is increasing evidence that there are different progression routes leading to invasive breast cancer, depending on histology and differentiation grade. The aim of this study was to determine alterations in the expression of proteins involved in proliferation and apoptosis in non-invasive and invasive ductal breast lesions. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 106 usual ductal hyperplasias (UDH), 61 DCIS lesions and 53 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Increased proliferation (Ki67), overexpression of cyclin D1, HER-2/neu, p21 and p53, and decreased expression of bcl-2 and p27 could already be found in UDH. Significant differences between UDH and DCIS lesions were found for only one protein when UDH was compared with well-differentiated DCIS (p27), for three proteins when compared with intermediately differentiated DCIS (p21, cyclin D1, Ki-67), and for all proteins when compared with poorly-differentiated DCIS. Comparing DCIS with invasive lesions of same differentiation grade, proliferation was elevated in the invasive lesions. Altered expression of the other proteins was in general only slightly increased in the invasive lesion compared with DCIS. The number of proteins with altered expression per lesion was highest in poorly-differentiated lesions and was comparable between DCIS and invasive cancer of the same differentiation grade. In conclusion, the biggest changes in expression of these proliferation and apoptosis related proteins appear to occur during the transition from hyperplasia to DCIS; they probably play a minor role in the transition from DCIS to invasive breast lesion of same differentiation grade. Well-differentiated in situ and invasive breast lesions share many of the aberrations in expression of these proteins, as do poorly-differentiated in situ and invasive lesions. However, there are many differences between the well and poorly-differentiated lesions. This further supports the existence of different progression routes leading to breast cancer.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ with basal-like phenotype: a possible precursor to invasive basal-like breast cancer.

Basal-like carcinomas have recently been identified in gene expression profiling studies as a subtype of invasive breast cancer. These lesions are estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative (triple negative), and typically express basal cytokeratins, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and/or c-kit. As poorly differentiated invasive ductal carcinomas, they presumably have a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) precursor with similar cytologic and immunophenotypic features. However, the frequency and even the existence of a DCIS lesion with an immunophenotype analogous to that of invasive basal-like carcinomas have not been previously evaluated. We studied 66 cases of high nuclear grade DCIS using antibodies to ER, PR, HER2, three basal cytokeratins, EGFR, and c-kit to determine the frequency of the triple negative phenotype, and to determine the relationship between the triple negative phenotype and expression of basal cytokeratins and other biomarkers characteristically expressed by invasive basal-like carcinomas. Four cases (6%) exhibited the triple negative phenotype; the remaining cases showed other combinations of ER, PR, and HER2 expression (nontriple negative). Basal cytokeratins, EGFR, or both were expressed by all four triple negative lesions, but by only 21 of 51 (42%) nontriple negative cases (P = 0.04). We conclude that a small proportion of high-grade ductal carcinomas in situ exhibit an ER-negative/PR-negative/HER2-negative (triple negative) phenotype, and these lesions more commonly show expression of basal cytokeratins and/or EGFR than nontriple negative high-grade DCIS. Given that invasive breast cancers typically share immunophenotypic features with the ductal carcinoma in situ from which they arise, our findings raise the possibility that the triple-negative, basal cytokeratin and/or EGFR-positive DCIS lesions we identified represent a precursor lesion to invasive basal-like carcinomas.     

Oestrogen receptor negativity as a marker for high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

AIMS: To compare the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, in an attempt to establish more objective criteria for the classification of DCIS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sections of 64 cases of in-situ carcinoma of the breast were stained for ER, progesterone receptors (PgR), androgen receptors (AR), c-erbB-2 and p53, using the immunoperoxidase technique. The cases included 60 DCIS and four lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Four DCIS lesions were associated with foci of microinvasion. The 60 DCIS cases included 31 high grade, 23 intermediate grade and six low grade. Twenty-four DCIS cases (40%) were ER-negative and 36 were positive. ER negativity was significantly associated with high nuclear grade (88% versus 27% for ER-positive cases, P < 0.001), PgR negativity (100% versus 25%, P < 0.001), c-erbB-2 positivity (79% versus 14%, P < 0.001) and p53 positivity (58% versus 6%, P < 0.001). There was no difference between ER-negative and -positive DCIS as regards AR expression, with 91% of cases in each group being AR-positive. Of the four cases of DCIS with microinvasion, three were ER- and PgR-negative, all four were c-erbB-2-positive and AR-positive and one was p53-positive. None of the four LCIS was ER, PgR or AR-negative and none was c-erbB-2- or p53-positive. CONCLUSIONS: There is a highly significant direct relationship between ER negativity in DCIS and high nuclear grade, PgR negativity and c-erbB-2 and p53 positivity. We suggest that immunohistological assessment of ER status may help in providing a more objective way of classifying DCIS.     

Expression of Ki-67, p53, bcl-2, estrogen receptors alpha in patients with clear cell renal carcinoma and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

Three hundred and thirty-six cases of clear-cell renal carcinoma (CCRC) were examined for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation: exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation in exon 21 of the EGFR gene. The expression of Ki-67, bcl-2, p53, and estrogen receptors alpha was studied in CCRC with EGFR mutation. There were 4 cases of CCRC with EGFR exon 19 deletion. The frequency of EGFR gene mutations was 1.2%. L858R missense mutations in exon 21 of the EGFR gene were absent. In CCRC, EGFR gene mutation (exon 19 deletion) was detected in 3 men and 1 woman with an age range of 50 to 60 years and Fuhrman differentiation grade 2 or 3. The Ki-67 index varied from 4 to 23%. The expression of bcl-2 and p53 was negative. A moderate estrogen receptor alpha expression was revealed in 1 of 4 cases.     

细胞角蛋白在乳腺导管内增生性病变鉴别诊断中的应用

目的 研究细胞角蛋白(CK)在乳腺导管内增生性病变的表达情况,寻求帮助乳腺导管内增生性病变鉴别诊断的分子标记。方法 按Page标准选病例,收集本院1993～2002年病理标本,乳腺导管内增生性病变92例(石蜡包埋标本)、冷冻切片30例以及导管上皮普通性增生原代培养上皮细胞和浸润性导管癌细胞株T-47D和MCF-7。采用EnVision标准二步法研究CK34βE12、CK8以及CK14表达情况。结果 (1)石蜡组织中CK34βE12在导管上皮普通性增生、不典型性增生、导管原位癌以及浸润性导管癌的阳性结果分别为95．2％、33．3％、19．2％和12．5％;导管上皮普通性增生、浸润性导管癌的冷冻切片CK34βE12阳性率为100％和55％;CK34βE12在MCF7呈阴性染色,在普通性增生原代培养细胞及T-47D中呈阳性染色;(2)CK8与CK14在乳腺导管上皮普通性增生的表达模式与其他病变不同。结论 CK34βE12有助于乳腺导管内增生性病变的鉴别诊断,但还不适用于术中冷冻快速诊断;CK8与CK14在乳腺导管内增生性病变中的表达模式可有助于鉴别诊断。     

Androgen receptor expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: relation to oestrogen and progesterone receptors

AIMS: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been diagnosed increasingly since the advent of mammographic screening. In contrast to the situation in invasive breast carcinoma, there are no reports on androgen receptor (AR) status in DCIS and few reports on oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors. METHODS: AR expression was examined in 57 cases of DCIS of the breast and correlated to the degree of differentiation and ER/PR status using immunohistochemical methods. RESULTS: AR positivity was noted in 19 of the cases, whereas the other 38 cases were negative. There was no significant association between AR expression and the degree of differentiation of DCIS; three of the 13 well differentiated DCIS cases, 10 of the 19 intermediately differentiated cases, and six of the 25 poorly differentiated cases were positive (p = 0.093). However, a strong association was shown between the expression of ER (p < 0.0001) and PR (p = 0.002) and the degree of differentiation of DCIS. In addition, no significant association was found between the expression of AR and the expression of ER (p = 0.26) or PR (p = 0.57) in DCIS of the breast. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of cases of DCIS of the breast express AR and this may be associated with apocrine differentiation, which may impact on accurate typing of DCIS. Moreover, the expression of AR (but not ER or PR) in DCIS does not appear to be associated with the degree of differentiation.