Alternative methods of titrating continuous positive airway pressure: a large multicenter study

Standard practice for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) requires pressure titration during attended laboratory polysomnography. However, polysomnographic titration is expensive and time-consuming. The aim of this study was to ascertain, in a large sample of CPAP-naive patients, whether CPAP titration performed by an unattended domiciliary autoadjusted CPAP device or with a predicted formula was as effective as CPAP titration performed by full polysomnography. The main outcomes were the apnea-hypopnea index and the subjective daytime sleepiness. We included 360 patients with SAHS requiring CPAP treatment. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: standard, autoadjusted, and predicted formula titration with domiciliary adjustment. The follow-up period was 12 weeks. With CPAP treatment, the improvement in subjective sleepiness and apnea-hypopnea index was very similar in the three groups. There were no differences in the objective compliance of CPAP treatment and in the dropout rate of the three groups at the end of the follow-up. Autoadjusted titration at home and predicted formula titration with domiciliary adjustment can replace standard titration. These procedures could lead to considerable savings in cost and to significant reductions in the waiting list.     

Accuracy of an unattended home CPAP titration in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

Treatment of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) by fixed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) requires an in-laboratory titration procedure to determine the effective pressure level (Peff ). We recently reported that one auto-CPAP machine can be used without titration study allowing Peff determination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of an auto CPAP trial at home. A 1- or 2-wk automatic CPAP trial was done at home in 40 patients by estimating the reference pressure (Pref ) to be set and a Pref + 3 cm H(2)O/-4 cm H(2)O pressure interval. Peff was then determined according to the percentage of CPAP time that was spent 相似文献   

Efficacy of daytime continuous positive airway pressure titration in severe obstructive sleep apnoea.

The aim of this study was to evaluate manual nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) titration during daytime polysomnography compared with conventional overnight titration for patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea. Thirty-two patients who underwent daytime titration were retrospectively matched (for age, sex, body mass index and apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI)) to a group titrated overnight during the same period. Successful titration was defined as the identification of the nCPAP level (effective nCPAP (Peff)) required to eliminate respiratory events during all sleep stages. After 3 months of therapy on nCPAP at Peff, nCPAP utilization history was obtained and a group of patients underwent a repeat polysomnogram (PSG) and completed a follow-up Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. Initial titration was successful in 91% of daytime patients and 91% of overnight patients. The success of daytime titration was not related to diagnostic AHI or ESS score. Subjective nCPAP utilization was statistically similar in both groups. On the follow-up PSG, there were no significant differences between daytime (n=11) and overnight (n=11) patients in measures of sleep quality or respiratory disturbance. Both groups demonstrated similar and significant improvements in ESS score. These findings suggest that the effective nasal continuous positive airway pressure can be accurately established during daytime titration in a substantial proportion of severe, symptomatic obstructive sleep apnoea patients.     

Constant vs auto-continuous positive airway pressure in patients with sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome and a high variability in pressure requirement

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Auto-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been reported to have no more efficacy than constant CPAP in unselected patients with sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (SAHS). The aim of this study was to evaluate patients judged to be good candidates for auto-CPAP because of a high within-night variability in pressure requirement. DESIGN: Single-blind, randomized, cross-over study (2 x 8 weeks) to compare auto-CPAP with constant CPAP. PATIENTS: Outpatients with moderate-to-severe SAHS attending the chest clinic. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were equipped at home in the auto-CPAP mode (model GK418A; Malinckrodt; Nancy, France), using a 4- to 14-cm H(2)O pressure range. Those individuals having a high within-night variability in pressure requirement, assessed at the end of a 14-day run-in period, were included in the cross-over study. Auto-CPAP was compared with constant CPAP (according to a titration night in the sleep laboratory) in terms of compliance, efficacy on apneas (assessed from the pressure monitor), and sleepiness (assessed on the Epworth sleepiness scale). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of 90 consecutive patients with SAHS, 27 patients were selected for a within-night variability in pressure requirement exceeding a given threshold. After completion of the cross-over, 24 patients were evaluable. The median percentage of nights the machine was used was 95.5% (range, 45 to 100%) on constant CPAP, and 96.5% (range, 40 to 100%) on auto-CPAP; the median apnea index recorded by the device was 0.40/h (range, 0 to 2.40/h) on constant CPAP, and 0.45/h (range, 0 to 5.80/h) on auto-CPAP (differences not significant). The mean Epworth sleepiness score was significantly (p < 0.01) lower on auto-CPAP (5.1; SD, 2.8) than on constant CPAP (6.1; SD, 2.8). CONCLUSIONS: In patients selected for a high within-night variability in pressure requirement, auto-CPAP administered via a GK418A device was equivalent to constant CPAP based on a titration night in the sleep laboratory. Subjective ratings for sleepiness were slightly lower on auto-CPAP.     

Automatic CPAP titration with different self-setting devices in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices automatically adjust the pressure according to upper airway obstructions. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment effects of different automatic CPAP devices (AutoSet, Horizon and Virtuoso) with conventional CPAP in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea independently of financial manufacturer support. Twelve male patients with obstructive sleep apnoea were submitted to a crossover study protocol with overnight polysomnography for 6 consecutive nights. After diagnostic polysomnography, the CPAP pressure was manually titrated. Over the next 4 nights, the patients were treated with any one of the three automatic CPAP devices or fixed CPAP in random order. The apnoea/hypopnoea index on the diagnostic night was 67.3+/-21.7 events h(-1), and was significantly reduced to 0.7+/-1.2, 3.0+/-2.9, 2.3+/-2.5 and 12.0+/-13.6 events x h(-1) with the fixed CPAP, AutoSet, Horizon and Virtuoso devices respectively. An apnoea/ hypopnoea index of <5 events h(-1), an indicator of optimal treatment, was achieved in all patients with fixed CPAP and in 10 patients using the Autoset and Horizon devices, but in only six of the 12 using the Virtuoso. The mean pressure was significantly lower with the AutoSet and Virtuoso devices, but not with the Horizon as compared to fixed CPAP. The maximum pressure was significantly higher with the Horizon. It is concluded that automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices produce a significant reduction in apnoea/hypopnoea index; however, there is considerable difference in the efficacy of the various devices.     

Automatic pressure titration with APAP is as effective as manual titration with CPAP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to initiate positive-pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea is still debated. Current options are autotitrating positive airway pressure (APAP) or manual titration with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Procedures differ by parameters and by algorithms used for adapting pressure. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of attended automatic titration in a randomized crossover study compared with manual titration over 2 nights where the sequence of the titration mode was changed. Therapy outcome was controlled after 6 weeks. METHODS: 21 sleep apnea patients were treated using manual CPAP versus automatic APAP titration. The mode used during the 2nd night was continued for 6 weeks. Cardiorespiratory polysomnography, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), SF-36 score and compliance were assessed. RESULTS: Apnea-hypopnea index reduction was equally effective at similar effective pressure independent of the titration mode. If APAP was applied during the 1st night, total sleep time was longer (384 vs. 331 min, p < 0.01) and sleep efficacy was higher (91 vs. 81%, p < 0.01) than after starting with manual titration with CPAP. Compliance was comparable in both groups (4.6 +/- 1.9 h). The ESS improved in both groups (from 12.9 to 6.5). SF-36 scores and therapeutic pressure did not much change. CONCLUSIONS: Taking the sequence of titration into account, we found equal effectiveness of CPAP and APAP. Sleep quality was better with initial application of APAP - which favors attended automatic titration if only 1 titration night is possible. Both modes are comparable after 6 weeks regarding therapeutic pressure, efficacy, compliance and quality of life.     

Is automatic CPAP titration as effective as manual CPAP titration in OSAHS patients? A meta-analysis

Purpose  

It is costly and time-consuming to conduct the standard manual titration to identify an effective pressure before continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. Automatic titration is cheaper and more easily available than manual titration. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of automatic titration in identifying a pressure and on the improvement of apnea/hyponea index (AHI) and somnolence, the change of sleep quality, and the acceptance and compliance of CPAP treatment, compared with the manual titration.     

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of modafinil in the treatment of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome

Some patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) remain subjectively and objectively sleepy despite using effective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The aim of this single center study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the novel wake-promoting medication modafinil in the treatment of CPAP-resistant daytime sleepiness. Thirty sleep apneics receiving effective CPAP therapy (objective use, 6.5 +/- 1.1 h/night) received daily single doses of 400 mg modafinil or placebo for 2 wk in a double-blind randomized crossover design. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at the end of both 2-wk treatment periods. Treatment periods were separated by a 1-wk washout. Modafinil had no effect on sleepiness as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale or the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (p > 0.1); however, significant improvements in alertness were found with the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (modafinil 18.3 +/- 3.9 min; placebo, 16.6 +/- 5.0 min; p < 0.02). No significant treatment-related improvements in cognitive performance or quality of life were found with modafinil (all p > 0.05). There was a significant reduction in CPAP use on modafinil compared to placebo (6.3 +/- 1 h/ night; 6.5 +/- 1, p = 0.03). This study suggests that modafinil may improve some aspects of alertness in patients with SAHS who remain sleepy during CPAP therapy, but further studies are required to assess the significance of the reduction in CPAP use.     

Automatic CPAP Performance in Patients with Sleep Apnea Plus COPD

Abstract

Background: Automatic CPAP devices have demonstrated good results in obtaining optimal fixed CPAP pressure to eliminate respiratory events in patients with sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS). However, automatic CPAP has not been fully studied in patients with COPD plus SAHS. Objectives: To analyse the performance of an automatic CPAP in severe COPD patients compared with SAHS patients with no associated co-morbidity. Methods: We compared 10 consecutive patients with SAHS and no associated co-morbidity and 10 patients with SAHS plus severe COPD who required CPAP titration. Automatic CPAP performance was studied during full-night PSG. Inadequate pressure increase periods, absence of pressure increases in reaction to respiratory events, air leak periods, and pressure behaviour in the face of erratic breathing periods were analysed. Results: The SAHS patients without co-morbidities vs. SAHS plus COPD patients presented: mean sleep efficiency, 80.2 (11.5)% vs. 76.5 (12.1)%; residual AHI, 6.3 (5.2) vs. 5.1 (7.7); residual CT90, 1 (3)% vs. 14 (1)%. The device´s performance demonstrates a mean of 1.2 (1.5) vs. 1.3 (1.2) periods of inadequate pressure increases; absence of pressure increases in reaction to respiratory events, 4.1 (5.4) vs. 0.6 (0.7) times; periods of air leaks, 1.3 (3.8) vs. 13.9 (11.7); mean optimal pressure, 9.1 (1.4) vs. 9.0 (1.9) cm H₂O. Conclusion: Titration with automatic CPAP could be as effective in patients with SAHS plus severe COPD as in patients with SAHS without COPD. However, the presence of more leakages must be taken into account.     

Role of different nocturnal monitorings in the evaluation of CPAP titration by autoCPAP devices

The aim of the study was to assess how the analysis of different signals recorded during application of automatic continuous positive airway pressure (autoCPAP) devices improves the evaluation of pressure titration in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) naive to treatment. Seventy-two patients underwent nocturnal polysomnography during autoCPAP (Autoset T, ResMed, Sydney, Australia) application. Progressively more complex combinations of signals were analysed in consecutive steps. According to the analysis of oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO(2)) alone, a fixed CPAP level suitable for treatment could not be identified in 3 subjects. When analysis of posture was added, titration was considered unsatisfactory in 1 more subject, due to a short time spent supine. Further, addition of flow and respiratory movements led to consider titration unsatisfactory in 1 more subject. Analysis of all polysomnographic signals demonstrated a not fully reliable titration in 9 subjects: 1 with short sleep duration, 2 without REM sleep, 4 with a short sleep time spent supine, and 3 subjects (already identified by SaO(2)) with insufficient correction of respiratory disorders even when a relatively high CPAP was administered. Mask leaks did not hamper titration. CPAP titration by automatic devices alone results in imperfect titration in >10% subjects naive to ventilatory treatment. Only polysomnographic recording ensures titration reliability in all patients. Further research is needed to identify simple and economic methods to reliably start the CPAP treatment.     

Influence of UPPP surgery on tolerance to subsequent continuous positive airway pressure in patients with OSAHS

To investigate the effect of uvlopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) on post-surgery continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Thirty-one OSAHS patients after UPPP surgery were recruited and studied on for more than 12 months after the procedure. Among them, 24 patients were treated with classical UPPP (cUPPP), which removes all of uvula and part of the soft palate. Seven had modified UPPP (mUPPP), keeping part of the uvula. The control group was 31 years in age, body mass index (BMI) and apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) matched, and newly diagnosed OSAHS patients without prior treatment. A manual titration of CPAP was performed during both (NREM) and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in all 62 patients. Patients were asked to keep a supine position while sleeping during the test. When significant mouth air leakage occurred and/or titration worsened with an increase of CPAP pressure, the pressure level was considered as the highest CPAP (hCPAP) a patient can tolerate in that sleep stage. The CPAP machine used for titration could produce highest pressure at 20 cm H₂O. There were 74% (23/31) of UPPP patients who had less than 50% decrease in AHI, and 84% (26/31) of the 31 patients still had AHI>15 (range 16–110) during post-operation polysomnography (PSG) test. Most of them need further CPAP therapy. All of the untreated OSAHS patients could tolerate 17–20 cm H₂O of CPAP during sleep. None had severe mouth air leak before an optimal pressure was reached. In contrast, four in the surgery group failed to respond to CPAP treatment during both NREM and REM sleep and one more during REM sleep. All of the seven patients who had a mUPPP could tolerate CPAP. One of the three tested both before and after surgery failed in the CPAP treatment after surgery during REM sleep. UPPP may compromise nasal CPAP therapy in OSAHS, especially in procedures with greater resection of the soft palate.     

Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure is not effective in patients with sleep apnea but no daytime sleepiness. a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome is defined by a pathologic number of respiratory events during sleep (the apnea-hypopnea index, defined as the number of apnea and hypopnea episodes per hour) and daytime symptoms (mostly, excessive sleepiness). In patients with the sleep apnea syndrome, treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) normalizes both the apnea-hypopnea index and diurnal symptoms. However, the effect of CPAP in persons with a pathologic apnea-hypopnea index without daytime sleepiness is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term effects of CPAP on quality of life, objective sleepiness, cognitive function, and arterial blood pressure in nonsleepy patients with a pathologic apnea-hypopnea index. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Six teaching hospitals in Spain. PATIENTS: 55 patients with an apnea-hypopnea index of 30 or greater who did not have daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 相似文献   

The use of a predicted CPAP equation improves CPAP titration success

Titration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is performed to determine the CPAP setting to prescribe for an individual patient. A prediction equation has been published that could be used to improve the success rate of CPAP titrations. The goals of this study were: (1) to test the hypothesis that the use of the prediction equation would achieve a higher rate of successful CPAP titrations; (2) to validate the equation as an accurate predictor of the prescribed CPAP setting and determine the factors that influence the accuracy of the prediction equation. A total of 224 patients underwent CPAP titration prior to using the equation, with a starting pressure of 5 cm H₂O. A total of 192 patients underwent CPAP titration using the equation-predicted CPAP level as the starting pressure (median starting pressure of 8 cm H₂O [interquartile range 7, 10 cm H₂O]). The percentage of successful studies, as defined by a 50% decrease in the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) and a final AHI 10 cm H₂O, increased from 50% to 68% (p<0.001), while the number of patients who were prescribed a CPAP level that had not been tested decreased from 22% to 5% (p<0.001). The equation was not accurate in predicting the prescribed level of CPAP, with only 30.8% of the patients with a prescribed pressure 3 cm H₂O of the predicted pressure. Female gender was the only predictor of a prescribed pressure 3 cm H₂O from the predicted pressure (odds ratio 3.45, 95% confidence intervals 1.67, 7.13, p<0.001). A CPAP prediction equation modestly increases the rate of successful CPAP titrations by increasing the starting pressure of the titration. The equation does not accurately predict the prescribed CPAP level, reaffirming the need for a titration study to determine the optimal prescribed level in a given patient.     

Reproducibility of a standardized titration procedure for the initiation of continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND: Manual titration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) under polysomnographic control is the method most commonly employed to establish the minimal effective pressure (P(eff)) for the treatment of the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSA). To date, however, the reproducibility of P(eff) titrated in this way has not been investigated in any detail. OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to establish the reproducibility of P(eff) determined by manual titrations of CPAP under polysomnographic control in the sleep lab. METHODS: In a group of 50 patients (5 women), with a mean (SD) apnoea-hypopnoea index of 39.3 (21.8), apnoea index of 28.1 (20.9) and oxygen desaturation index of 39.3 (22.6), with newly diagnosed OSA, manual titration of CPAP was performed on two consecutive nights using the following standard titration protocol: starting at 4 mbar, CPAP was increased by steps of 1 mbar at intervals of at least 5 min, until no signs of airway obstruction could be seen, and arousals were no longer elicited. When no airway obstruction was detected over a period of 30 min, the pressure was lowered once during the night in steps of 1 mbar at intervals of at least 10 min, until obstructive events reappeared, whereupon the pressure was again increased as described above, until, once more, no signs of airway obstruction and no arousals occurred. The second titration was carried out in a blind manner, that is the lab technician did not know the results of the first pressure titration. RESULTS: The mean (SD) P(eff) for all titrations was 8.1 mbar (2.9). A high level of correlation was found between the P(eff) titrated on the first night and that titrated on the second night (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.89). In a few individual cases, however, differences of up to 3 mbar were found between P(eff) on the first night and P(eff) on the second night. On average, the P(eff) measured on the second night was 0.5 mbar (SD = 1.3, range: -2.0 to 3.0 mbar) higher than that of the first night. CONCLUSIONS: With standardization of the manual titration of CPAP, P(eff) is readily reproducible. In individual cases, however, a difference of as much as 3.0 mbar between the two titrations is possible.     

An auto-continuous positive airway pressure device controlled exclusively by the forced oscillation technique.

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) has been demonstrated to be a very sensitive tool for the assessment of upper airway obstruction during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The present study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a novel auto-CPAP device based exclusively on the FOT. Following manual CPAP titration, 18 patients with OSA (mean apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) 48.0+/-28.1) were allocated to conventional CPAP and auto-CPAP treatment under polysomnographic control in randomized order. The patients were asked to assess their subjective daytime sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The mean AHI during auto-CPAP treatment was 3.4+/-3.4 and was comparable with that obtained during conventional CPAP treatment (4.2+/-3.6). The analysis of sleep architecture, the arousal index (6.6+/-2.1 versus 7.3+/-4.4) or the ESS (5.6+/-1.8 versus 7.3+/-4.4) did not reveal any significant differences. However, the mean CPAP pressure during auto-CPAP treatment (0.84+/-0.26 kPa) and in particular the pressure applied in the lateral body position (0.74+/-0.35 kPa), was significantly lower than that employed in conventional CPAP treatment (0.93+/-0.16 kPa, both comparisons: p<0.05). The auto-continuous positive airway pressure device proved equally as effective as conventional continuous positive airway pressure. However, the mean treatment pressure was significantly reduced, especially when patients were sleeping in the lateral position.     

Can patients with obstructive sleep apnea titrate their own continuous positive airway pressure?

Manual continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration in a sleep laboratory is costly and limits access for diagnostic studies. Many factors affect CPAP compliance, but education and support, rather than in-laboratory CPAP titration, appear to be pivotal. Self-adjustment of CPAP at home will provide equal or superior efficacy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as compared with in-laboratory titration. A randomized, single-blind, two-period crossover trial of CPAP treatment at the in-laboratory-determined optimal pressure versus at-home self-adjustment of CPAP (starting pressure based on prediction equation). Eighteen CPAP-naive patients (16 males, 50 +/- 15 years old, apnea hypopnea index 40 +/- 20) with a new diagnosis of OSA were tested. Testing was performed before and after CPAP treatment in each of two 5-week study limbs. CPAP, compliance with CPAP treatment, the Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire score, the Epworth sleepiness scale score, sleep architecture, sleep apnea severity, and maintenance of wakefulness tests were performed. Both modes of CPAP treatment significantly improved objective and subjective measures of OSA, but they did not differ in efficacy. Home self-titration of CPAP is as effective as in-laboratory manual titration in the management of patients with OSA.     

Slow-wave activity in sleep apnea patients before and after continuous positive airway pressure treatment: contribution to daytime sleepiness

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To estimate the course of slow-wave activity (SWA), its amount during the night, and its correlation with daytime sleepiness in sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) patients. This study also verified whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment also restores a normal pattern of SWA in severe SAS patients. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients with a diagnosis of severe SAS who showed a good clinical response to CPAP after approximately 9 months of treatment were included in this study. These patients were matched for sex and age with 10 control subjects. DESIGN: All subjects underwent 1 night of polysomnography (PSG), followed by the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) the next day. For the SAS patients only, the same procedure was repeated after 9 +/- 0.7 months of CPAP treatment. In addition to traditional scoring of sleep stages, apneas, hypopneas, and microarousals, the SWA, defined as the power in the 0.75- to 4.5-Hz frequency band, was evaluated. RESULTS: A positive correlation between SWA of the first cycle and the MSLT (r = 0.56; p = 0.045) was found before treatment. Moreover, SAS patients significantly increased their mean SWA after CPAP treatment in the first (p = 0.024) and second (p = 0.002) sleep cycles and restored a more physiologic decay of SWA across the night. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that daytime sleepiness in SAS patients may be the result of a lack of SWA during the first part of the night, and show that CPAP restores a more physiologic pattern of SWA across the night.     

悬雍垂咽软腭成形术对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者序贯持续气道正压通气治疗的影响

目的探讨悬雍垂咽软腭成形术(UPPP)后,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者在不同睡眠时相对持续气道正压通气(CPAP)压力耐受性的改变以及双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)对CPAP治疗失败者的应用价值.方法研究对象为34例UPPP术后的OSAHS患者,其中25例行切除全部悬雍垂及部分软腭的传统UPPP手术,9例行切除部分悬雍垂及部分软腭的改良UPPP手术.对照组为未经治疗的OSAHS患者34例.4例患者于术前及术后均进行了压力耐受情况测试.二组患者的最适CPAP治疗压力(oCPAP)及最大耐受压力(hCPAP)于非快动眼(NREM)及快动眼(REM)睡眠期由人工调定.所有测试均在术后3个月以上进行.对不能耐受CPAP治疗者,应用BiPAP治疗.结果 UPPP术后睡眠呼吸紊乱指数(AHI)改善50%以上者只有8例(28%),28例(82%)患者AHI超过15 次/h,仍需进一步治疗.34例对照者在NREM及REM睡眠期的hCPAP均在17～20 cm H2O(1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa),能够耐受CPAP治疗.34例术后患者在NREM及REM睡眠期的最大耐受压力在11～20 cm H2O的范围内,平均值显著低于对照者(P<0.01).5例患者于NREM及REM睡眠期、1例在REM睡眠期不能耐受CPAP治疗.4例术前及术后均进行测试者中1例在REM睡眠期,1例在REM及NREM睡眠期均难以达到oCPAP治疗压力,序贯CPAP治疗失败.6例CPAP治疗失败的术后患者均进行BiPAP治疗,均能较好地耐受BiPAP治疗.结论UPPP手术切除咽部软组织后可能降低OSAHS患者对序贯CPAP治疗的耐受性.对CPAP治疗失败者,BiPAP是可能的替代治疗手段.     

Determinants of daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea

To investigate determinants of daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), we studied 100 unselected OSAS patients by nocturnal polygraphic recording and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). Data obtained were submitted to three types of analysis. Respiratory disturbance index, oxygen saturation indices, body mass index, and total nocturnal sleep time did not significantly correlate with daytime sleepiness, as measured by the MSLT. Analysis of subgroups based on weight and degree of alertness also showed a nonsignificant correlation with daytime sleepiness. The best predictor of the excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) frequently found in OSAS patients was the nocturnal polygraphic recording of the sleep disturbances and sleep structure anomalies that reflect the brain's overall dysfunction in OSAS. Understanding why an electroencephalogram arousal response occurs during sleep in association with abnormal breathing and how this response can become blunted may help us to better predict the development of EDS.