Single versus dual chamber pacing in the young: noninvasive comparative evaluation of cardiac function

The advantages of atrial synchrony over asynchronous ventricular pacing remain unclear in the young, chronically right ventricular (RV) - paced patient. This is in contrast to the older patient with inherent diastolic dysfunction who has been shown to benefit from atrial synchrony with dual chamber (DDD,R/VDD), over single chamber rate response (VVI,R) ventricular pacing. The goal of this study was to noninvasively assess cardiac function in a group of young, RV-paced patients before and after establishment of atrial synchrony. Echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed from 10 patients with congenital or acquired complete AV block, who were VVI,R paced for 10.2 +/- 2 years (mean age at study 19.2 +/- 8.9 years), and were subsequently converted to DDD,R/VDD pacing (mean age at study 20.7 +/- 9.5 years). Paired t-test analysis of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function during VVI,R versus DDD,R/VDD pacing did not result in any short-term difference in LV short axis fractional area of change or FAC (53% +/- 7.5% vs 56.8% +/- 8.7%) or mitral maximal velocity (E) normalized to mitral flow velocity time integral (VTI) (5.2/s +/- 1.5 vs 4.4/s +/- 1.5). A decrease in mitral flow E/A ratio was observed after short-term DDD,R/VDD pacing (2.2 +/- 0.5 vs 1.9 +/- 0.3). Atrial synchronous dual chamber pacing in young patients with complete AV block does not lead to any appreciable early change in global LV function over single-site RV pacing. Therefore, early establishment of atrial synchrony in the young asymptomatic VVI,R-paced patient with normal intrinsic ventricular function may not be warranted.     

Hemodynamically optimized temporary cardiac pacing after surgery for congenital heart defects

Disturbance of normal AV synchrony and dyssynchronous ventricular contraction may be deleterious in patients with otherwise compromised hemodynamics. This study evaluated the effect of hemodynamically optimized temporary dual chamber pacing in patients after surgery for congenital heart disease. Pacing was performed in 23 children aged 5 days to 7.7 years (median 7.3 months) with various postoperative dysrhythmias, low cardiac output, and/or high inotropic support and optimized to achieve the highest systolic and mean arterial pressures. The following four pacing modes were used: (1) AV synchronous or AV sequential pacing with individually optimized AV delay in 11 patients with first- to third-degree AV block; (2) AV sequential pacing using transesophageal atrial pacing in combination with a temporary DDD pacemaker for atrial tracking and ventricular pacing in three patients with third-degree AV block and junctional ectopic tachycardia, respectively, who had poor signal and exit block on atrial epicardial pacing wires; (3) R wave synchronized atrial pacing in eight patients with junctional ectopic tachycardia and impaired antegrade AV conduction precluding the use of atrial overdrive pacing; (4) Atrio-biventricular sequential pacing in two patients. Pressures measured during optimized pacing were compared to baseline values at underlying rhythm (13 patients with first-degree AV block or junctional ectopic tachycardia) or during pacing modes commonly used in the given clinical situation: AAI pacing (1 patient with slow junctional rhythm and first-degree AV block during atrial pacing), VVI pacing (2 patients with third-degree AV block and exit block and poor sensing on epicardial atrial pacing wires) and dual-chamber pacing with AV delays set to 100 ms (atrial tracking) or 150 ms (AV sequential pacing) in 7 patients with second- to third-degree AV block and functional atrial pacing wires. Optimized pacing led to a significant increase in arterial systolic (mean) pressure from 71.5 +/- 12.5 (52.3 +/- 9.0) to 80.5 +/- 12.2 (59.7 +/- 9.1) mmHg (P < 0.001 for both) and a decrease in central venous (left atrial) pressure from 12.3 +/- 3.4 (10.5 +/- 3.2) to 11.0 +/- 3.0 (9.2 +/- 2.7) mmHg (P < 0.001 and < 0.005, respectively). In conclusion, several techniques of individually optimized temporary dual chamber pacing leading to optimal AV synchrony and/or synchronous ventricular contraction were successfully used to improve hemodynamics in patients with heart failure and selected dysrhythmias after congenital heart surgery.     

Importance of Heart Rate Response During Exercise in Patients Using Atrioventricular Synchronous and Ventricular Pacemakers

Atrioventricular synchronous pacing offers advantages over fixed-rate ventricular (VVI) pacing both at rest and during exercise. This study compared the hemodynamic effects at rest and exercise of ventricular pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, ventricular pacing where the rate was increased during exercise and dual chamber pacing. Ten patients, age 63 +/- 8 years, with multiprogrammable DDD pacemakers were studied using supine bicycle radionuclide ventriculography. Radionuclide data during dual chamber pacing was acquired at rest and during a submaximal workload of 200-400 kpm/min. The pacemakers were then programmed to VVI pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, and 1 week later, studies were repeated in the VVI mode at rest, during exercise at a rate of 70 beats/min, and during exercise with the VVI pacemaker programmed to a rate adapted to the DDD pacing exercise rate. At rest, the cardiac output was lower in the VVI compared with the AV sequential mode (4.1 +/- 1.1 vs 5.7 +/- 1.1 1/min, P less than 0.01). During exercise, the cardiac output increased from resting values in the DDD and VVI pacing modes, however cardiac output in the rate-adapted VVI mode was higher than in the VVI mode with the rate maintained at 70 beats/min (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 1.1 1/min, P = 0.02). Three patients completed lower workloads with VVI pacing at 70 beats/min compared with AV synchronous pacing. At rest, AV sequential pacing was superior to VVI pacing, suggesting the importance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. With VVI pacing during exercise, cardiac output was improved with an increased pacemaker rate, suggesting that the heart rate response during exercise was the major determinant of the higher cardiac output.     

Adverse effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing and identification of patients at risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure

In patients needing a pacemaker (PM) for bradycardia indications, the amount of right ventricular (RV) apical pacing has been correlated with atrial fibrillation (AFib) and heart failure (HF) in both DDD and VVI mode. RV pacing was linked with left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony in almost 50% of patients with PM implantation and atrioventricular (AV) node ablation for AFib. In patients with normal systolic function needing a PM, apical RV pacing resulted in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction. These negative effects were prevented by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Algorithms favoring physiological AV conduction are possible useful tools able to maintain both atrial and ventricular support and limit RV pacing. However, when chronic RV pacing cannot be avoided, it appears necessary to reconsider the cut-off value of basic LVEF for CRT. In HF patients, RV pacing can induce greater LV dyssynchrony, enhanced by underlying conduction diseases. In this context, a more deleterious effect of RV pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients with low LVEF can be expected. In some major ICD trials, DDD mode was correlated with increased mortality/HF. This negative impact was attributed to unnecessary RV pacing >40-50%, virtually absent in VVI-40 mode. However, some data suggest that avoiding RV pacing may also not be the best option for patients requiring an ICD. In patients with impaired LV function, AV synchrony should therefore be ensured. The best pacing mode in ICD patients with HF should be defined on an individual basis.     

Evaluation of atrial conduction time at various sites of right atrial pacing and influence on atrioventricular delay optimization by surface electrocardiography

Cardiac function and electrical stability may be improved by programming of optimal AV delay in DDD pacing. This study tested the hypothesis if the global atrial conduction time at various pacing sites can be derived from the surface ECG to achieve an optimal electromechanical timing of the left heart. Data were obtained from 60 patients following dual chamber pacemaker implantation. Right atrial septal pacing was associated with significantly shorter atrial conduction time (P < 0.0005) and P wave duration (P < 0.005), compared to standard right atrial pacing sites at the right atrial appendage or at the right free wall. The last two pacing sites showed no significant difference. In a group of 31 patients with AV block, optimal AV delay was achieved by programming a delay of 100 ms from the end of the paced P wave to peak/nadir of the paced ventricular complex. Optimization of AV delay resulted in a relative increase of echocardiographic stroke volume (SV) (10.9 +/- 13.7%; 95% CI: 5.9-15.9%) when compared to nominal AV delay (170 ms). Optimized AV delay was highly variable (range 130-250 ms; mean 180 +/- 35 ms). The hemodynamic response was characterized by a weak significant relationship between SV increase and optimized AV delay (R2 = 0.196, R = 0.443, P = 0.047). The study validated that septal pacing is advantageous for atrial synchronization compared to conventional right atrial pacing. Tailoring the AV delay with respect to the surface ECG improved systolic function significantly and was superior to nominal AV delay settings in the majority of patients.     

Dual-site right atrial pacing increases left atrial appendage flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Dual-site right atrial pacing has been proposed as a promising concept for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Effects of this pacing configuration on left atrial appendage (LAA) flow and transmitral flow may be of prognostic and hemodynamic relevance. This study aims to characterize acute changes in left atrial flow depending on dual-site right atrial pacing. METHODS: In 12 patients (66 +/- 8.8 years, 4 women) with PAF and sinus bradycardia a pacemaker with a right atrial dual-site lead configuration (right atrial lateral and coronary sinus ostium) was implanted. Flow velocities in the left pulmonary vein (LPV), LAA, and across the mitral valve were assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and compared during sinus rhythm (SR) and dual-site (DS) pacing. RESULTS: Dual-site pacing resulted in higher maximum (SR: 0.57 m/s; pacing: 0.77 m/s; P < 0.02) and mean (SR: 0.33 m/s; DS: 0.47 m/s; P < 0.01) LAA emptying flow when compared with SR. The passive transmitral flow component (maximum E-wave velocity) was lower during dual-site pacing (SR: 0.53 m/s vs DS: 0.44 m/s, P < 0.02). The E/A ratio tended to be lower during dual-site pacing (SR: 1.21 vs DS: 1.01, P = 0,10). LPV flow velocities during SR and DS pacing did not differ. CONCLUSION: DS right atrial stimulation in patients with PAF increases the LAA emptying flow velocity and shifts the transmitral flow pattern towards a lower passive component when compared with sinus rhythm. The change in LAA flow may contribute to a lower incidence of thromboembolism and merits further investigation.     

Single Lead VDD Pacing: Multicenter Study

Optimal treatment for patients with AV block and normal sinoatrial node (SA) function entails atrial sensing and ventricular pacing (VDD mode). Single-lead VDD pacing preserves AV synchrony, precludes the need to insert two leads, and makes the implanter's work simpler and quicker. Our objectives were to verify the performance of the Thera(tm) VDD pacing system (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), and evaluate the effectiveness of its atrial sensing and its ventricular sensing and pacing. In 165 patients, 150 adults (mean age 62 ± 18 years) and 15 children (mean age 7 ± 5 years) with 1°–3° AV block and normal SA node function, a Thera VDD system (Models 8948 or 8968) was implanted. Intraoperative ventricular electrical measurements were not significantly different from those of VVI pacemakers. The mean amplitude of the atrial signal during implantation was 4.1 ± 1.9 mV. Optimal atrial signals during implantation were usually obtained in the mid or lower part of the right atrium by using a special technique. Adequate atrial measurements remained stable throughout 24 months. There was no difference between serial measurements of atrial signal amplitudes at predischarge and during follow-up visits. Reposition of the lead was done in 2 patients (1.4%), and reprogramming to VVI in 7 patients: due to atrial fibrillation in 3 (1.8%) and due to atrial undersensing in 4 patients (2.4%). Thera VDD pacing is reliable and easy to manage with dependable atrial sensing and ventricular pacing. The survival rate of VDD pacing at 2 years was 96%.     

DDI Pacing: Indications, Expectations, and Follow-Up

The DDI mode of pacing that permits noncompetitive atrioventricular sequential bradycardia support was chosen in 65 of 480 (14%) patients selected for dual chamber pacing between February 1985 and March 1990. All patients were implanted with Pacesetter 283 or 285 pulse generators and programmed to DDI. The indications for pacing were sick sinus syndrome (n = 52), combined sinus node dysfunction and AV block (n = 13). Forty-two of these patients had a history of paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. All patients received passive fixation atrial and ventricular leads. Follow-up thereafter was performed predischarge, and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after discharge. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1-61 months (mean 31 months). Fifty-four of 65 (83%) patients chosen for DDI remain programmed in the DDI mode. Three patients were reprogrammed to VVI and eight to DDD. During the course of follow-up, six patients presented with effective VVI pacing with consistent ventriculoatrial conduction that was appropriately sensed by the atrial circuit with atrial output inhibition. A further four patients presented with "functional undersensing" due to ventricular blanking period (VBP) characteristics in these pulse generators and in this mode. Functional undersensing was eliminated in all but one patient by reprogramming the VBP to 13 msec with no subsequent episodes of provoked crosstalk inhibition. Effective VVI pacing was observed in patients with AV block during times of sinus acceleration. While DDI mode is an effective form of pacing, permitting non-competitive atrioventricular sequential pacing, potential limitations include: effective VVI pacing during intact ventriculoatrial conduction, functional undersensing when long VBP are programmed, and effective VI pacing with sinus node acceleration during AV block.     

Left Atrial Size and Wall Motion in Patients with Permanent Ventricular and Atrial Pacing

KUBICA, J., ET AL.: Left Atrial Size and Wall Motion in Patients with Permanent Ventricular and Atrial Pacing. It is well known that during permanent ventricular pacing atrial arrhythmias and embolic complications occur much more frequently in comparison to permanent atrial or sequential pacing. He-modynamic disturbances caused by ventriculoatrial conduction (VAC) are thought to be responsible for those complications. The aim of this study was to compare the left atrial size and its wall motion in three groups of patients with sick sinus syndrome. Group 1: 58 patients with VVI pacing and VAC observed (22 males, 36 females, aged 31–86, mean 62.3). Group 2: 43 patients with primary AAI pacing (13 males, 30 females, aged 27–74, mean 57.8). Group 3: 13 patients with AAI or DDD replacing the primary VVI mode due to pacemaker syndrome and/or heart failure, all with VAC present during VVI pacing (7 males, 6 females, aged 26–80, mean 59.8). Two-dimensional/M-mode echocardiography was performed in all these patients. In group 1 mean diastolic as well as mean systolic atrial diameters were significantly greater (p < 0.005) and wall motion significantly smaller (p < 0.005) in comparison to the other groups. Left atrial wall motion amounted to only 7.4% of the mean diastolic diameter in this group. Mean left atrial diastolic and systolic diameters and wall motion in patients with pacemakers preserving atrioventricular synchrony (group 2 and group 3) were almost identical and wall motion amounted to about 22% of the diastolic diameter in both these groups. We conclude that ventriculoatrial conduction leads to significant enlargement of left atrium and to the atrial wall-motion decrease. This predisposes to arrhythmias and embolic complications. Changes in atrial size and performance seem to be reversible with restoration of the physiological atrioventricular synchrony.     

A Double-Blind Study of Submaximal Exercise Tolerance and Variation in Paced Rate in Atrial Synchronous Compared to Activity Sensor Modulated Ventricular Pacing

To assess the variation in paced rate during everyday activity and the importance of atrioventricular synchronization (AV synchrony) for submaximal exercise tolerance, atrial synchronous (DDD) and activity rate modulated ventricular (VVI,R) pacing were compared in 17 patients with high degree AV block. The patients were randomly assigned to either mode and evaluated by treadmill exercise to moderate exertion and by 24-hour Holter monitoring after 2 months in the DDD and VVI,R modes, respectively. At the end of the study, the patients were programmed to the pacing mode corresponding to the preferred study period. During the treadmill test, the mean exercise time to submaximal exertion (Borg 5/10), exertion ratings and respiratory rate did not differ between pacing modes despite a significantly lower ventricular rate in the VVI,R mode. The atrial rate during VVI,R pacing was significantly higher than the ventricular rate, but did not differ from the ventricular rate during DDD pacing. There was a diurnal variation in paced rate in both pacing modes. Paced ventricular rate was, however, higher and variation in paced rate greater in DDD compared to VVI,R pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode, three patients preferred the VVI,R mode, while five subjects did not express any preference. The results from this study indicate that the variation in paced rate during activity sensor-driven VVI,R pacing does not match that during DDD pacing neither during everyday activities nor during submaximal treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, no differences in exercise time, Borg ratings, and respiratory rate during submaximal exercise were found. Thus, for most patients with high degree AV block, DDD and VVI,R pacing seem equally satisfactory for submaximal exercise.     

Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics

It has been shown that dual chamber pacing with preservation of AV synchrony (DDD) is superior to fixed rate ventricular (VVI) or rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing modes, as evaluated by ventilatory response to exercise. Previous studies have focused on the benefits of maintained AV synchrony at maximal exercise. However, there are limited data comparing O2 kinetics in different pacing modes during low intensity exercise, representing the majority of daily activities. This study aimed to provide an evaluation of different pacing modes using O2 kinetics during low intensity exercise. Nineteen patients (age 61 +/- 18 years) with complete AV block underwent low intensity treadmill exercise (35 W) with simultaneous evaluation of symptoms and O2 kinetics in three pacing modes. The first test was performed in DDD mode followed by a second test in VVIR mode with a programmed heart rate corresponding to the sinus rate during the first test. After 6 minutes of each test, the mode was switched from DDD to VVIR and vice versa. The third test was performed in VVI mode at 70 beats/min. O2 kinetics were defined as O2 deficit (time [rest to steady state] x delta VO2-sigma VO2 [rest to steady state]) and mean response time (MRT) of oxygen consumption (O2 deficit/delta VO2). The O2 deficit was 551 +/- 134 mL in DDD pacing, 634 +/- 139 mL in VVIR pacing, and 648 +/- 179 mL in VVI pacing (P = 0.001). MRT was 49 +/- 7.8 seconds in DDD pacing, 54.7 +/- 9.5 seconds in VVIR pacing, and 57.4 +/- 11.0 seconds in VVI pacing (P = 0.002). Ten (53%) patients developed symptoms during switch from DDD to VVIR mode whereas the switch from VVIR to DDD mode was not perceived by any patient (P < 0.001). In conclusion, our study shows an impact of AV synchronous pacing and heart rate adaptation on O2 kinetics during low intensity exercise that correspond to casual daily life activities. Our observations may have clinical implications for the management of patients with complete AV block.     

A Time-Related Study of the Hemodynamic Benefit of Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Evaluated by Doppler Echocardiography

We have used Doppler echocardiography to estimate the stroke volume (SV) in a study of 13 patients equipped with DDD pacemakers. SV was measured both during DDD and VVI pacing after observation times of 1,3,6, and 12 months of DDD pacing. SV was also measured at seven atrioventricular (AV) intervals (75-250 ms) in the search for optimal AV intervals. Mitral flow velocity was investigated to see if DDD pacing resulted in synchronous atrial contraction, and if mitral insufficiency existed at any of the pacing modes. Compared with the VVI mode, DDD pacing resulted in a mean increase in SV of 21 +/- 2% for the four observation periods. Two patients with severe left ventricular failure had no significant increase in SV during DDD vs VVI pacing. In each patient, an optimal AV interval ranging between 100-250 ms for the SV was found. Velocity profiles of mitral flow showed synchronous atrial contraction during DDD pacing, but not during VVI pacing. Mitral insufficiency was not seen in any pacing mode. DDD pacing resulted in a reduction in SV during the first 6 months, and was constant thereafter. Doppler echocardiography can be used repeatedly to evaluate the hemodynamic response of DDD pacing vs VVI pacing, and to find which AV interval gives the highest SV in the individual patient. Our study further shows that the hemodynamic benefit of DDD pacing is present after short-term as well as after long-term DDD pacing.     

Atrial Arrhythmias in Dual Chamber Pacing and Their Influence on Long-Term Mortality

A retrospective study of 252 patients who received a DDD pacemaker between October 1982 and December 1990 was performed. During a mean follow-up of 30 months, reprogramming to the VVI mode was necessary in 39 patients (15.5%). Technical problems causing downgrading occurred 15 times, of which 13 problems became permanent. A total number of 24 patients had sustained atrial arrhythmias, including 14 with atrial fibrillation and 10 with atrial flutter. In this group, conversion to sinus rhythm could be obtained in 38%. After 2 years, reliable DDD pacing was maintained in 86% of the surviving patients. The survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% and 89%, respectively, and was not influenced by arrhythmias or technical problems. We conclude that atrial arrhythmias including flutter are the most important reasons for reprogramming to the VVI mode, although in an important number of patients, predominantly those with flutter, restoration of AV synchrony can be obtained. The high number of patients with atrial flutter could imply some role for DDD devices offering the option of antitachycardia pacing. Reprogramming of the pacing mode did not influence mortality.     

CDFI评价房室非同步,同步起搏对血流动力学的影响

本文应用彩色多普勒血流显像仪对17例安置永久性心脏起搏器患者进行了血流动力学研究。结果表明:房室同步起搏的SV、CO及PFVE、ETVI、PFVE/PFVA较之房室非同步起搏明显增加,房室非同步起搏后SBP、MAP降低、体重增加、心房内径增大、瓣膜返流率高,提示房室非同步起搏对瓣膜功能、血流动力学影响明显,是促发起搏器综合征(PMS)的主要动因。     

European clinical experience with a dual chamber single pass sensing and pacing defibrillation lead

Dual chamber ICDs are increasingly implanted nowadays, mainly to improve discrimination between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias but also to maintain AV synchrony in patients with bradycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate a new single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of true bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and integrated bipolar sensing and pacing in the right ventricle. The performance of the lead was evaluated in 57 patients (age 61 +/- 12 years; New York Heart Association 1.9 +/- 0.6, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.38 +/- 0.15) at implant, at prehospital discharge, and during a 1-year follow-up. Sensing and pacing behavior of the lead was evaluated in six different body positions. In four patients, no stable position of the atrial electrode could intraoperatively be found. The intraoperative atrial sensing was 2.3 +/- 1.6 mV and the atrial pacing threshold 0.8 +/- 0.5 V at 0.5 ms. At follow-up, the atrial sensing ranged from 1.5 mV to 2.2 mV and the atrial pacing threshold product from 0.8 to 1.7 V/ms. In 11 patients, an intermittent atrial sensing problem and in 24 patients an atrial pacing dysfunction were observed in at least one body position. In 565 episodes, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.5% were found for ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, this single pass defibrillation lead performed well as a VDD lead and for dual chamber arrhythmia discrimination. However, loss of atrial capture in 45% of patients preclude its use in patients depending on atrial pacing.     

Development of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrioventricular block after atrioventricular synchronized pacing

Many studies have evidenced an increased incidence of AF in patients receiving single chamber ventricular pacing (VVI) when compared with those undergoing an atrial-based system (AAI or DDD). However, the difference in incidence of AF between two atrial-based systems (VDD, DDD) in patients with AV block was still controversial. This study was conducted to compare the development of AF between different modes of pacemakers (VDD and DDD) in patients with symptomatic AV block. A retrospective review was conducted of the detailed records of all consecutive patients who received permanent pacemakers due to symptomatic bradycardia from March 1995 to March 2000. The occurrence of AF was documented when there was presence of AF in the free-run or 12-lead ECG, any ECG strips, or persistent AF on 24-hour Holter ECG during the follow-up. The study included 152 patients (44 women, 108 men; mean age 73). The patients were divided into two groups: VDD (n = 100) and DDD (n = 52). The mean follow-up was 48.9 +/- 22.9 months. The incidence of AF was 7.9%. A higher incidence of AF was noted in the DDD group (15.4%) when compared with the VDD group (4.0%, P = 0.023). The incidence of development of AF in patients with AV block was higher in those receiving DDD cardiac pacing when compared with those who received the VDD system. The authors suggest that VDD pacing may be a better choice than the DDD system for patients with AV block, but without clinical evidence of sinus node dysfunction, and if an atrial lead is required, it should be placed close to the Bachmann's bundle.     

Short-Term Atrioventricular Sequential Pacing Does Not Adversely Affect Collateral Blood Flow: A Study During Angioplasty

Altered sequence of ventricular activation sequence results in marked derangements in mechanical events. In the present study, we investigated the comparative effects of atrial and AV sequential pacing on collateral blood flow during angioplasty. Twenty-eight patients with stable angina and left anterior descending artery disease undergoing balloon angioplasty were studied. Collateral flow was determined during balloon inflation from the distal flow velocity of the ipsilateral artery (17 patients) or from the increase of the maximal diastolic blood flow velocity (Vc) of the contralateral artery (11 patients). Flow measurements were made using the Doppler flow guidewire. The relative resistance in the collateral vascular bed (RRj also was estimated in the latter group of patients. After the first balloon inflation, two similar consecutive balloon inflations were done under atrial and AV sequential pacing, at a rate of 15 beats/min higher than the sinus rate, in the absence ofvasoactive medication. One minute after the initiation of pacing, the second and third balloon inflations were begun and the pacing continued until the balloon inflations were completed. In the ipsilateral group, average peak velocity was 84.6 t 24.2 mm/s during atrial pacing and 82.7 ± 29.7 mm/s during AV sequential pacing (P = NS). In the contralateral group. Vc was l8%± 12% during atrial pacing and 17%± 14% during AV sequential pacing, and the RR was 4.5 ± 4.7 and 4.9 ± 6.4, respectively (both P = NS). The coronary wedge/mean blood pressure was similar during the two tested balloon inflations. Short-term AV sequential pacing at rest does not adversely affect collateral blood flow and resistance in patients with left anterior descending artery disease.     

经食管超声心动描记术评价非风湿性房颤患者左心耳功能

目的应用多平面经食管超声心动图技术（ＴＥＥ）评价排风湿性房颤患者左心耳功能。方法对３０名健康人和３０例非风湿性房颤（ＮＲＡＦ）患者分别在心底短轴观测量了左心耳最大直径,同一心动周期内左心耳最大、最小面积及左心耳最大排空速度,并将ＮＲＡＦ患者按照左房自发显影及血栓的有无分为２组。结果ＮＲＡＦ组左心耳增大,收缩力及血流速度均减低,且这种变化在有血栓和（或）有血栓形成倾向的患者中更为明显。结论应用ＴＥＥ技术评价左心耳功能可为判断ＮＲＡＦ患者血栓栓塞危险程度提供新的依据。     

经食管超声心动图在左心耳封堵术中的应用价值研究

目的探讨经食管超声心动图（TEE）在经皮左心耳封堵术前筛选、术中监测及术后随访中的应用价值。 方法选取2016年1月至2016年12月武汉亚洲心脏病医院共54例心房颤动患者应用Watchman封堵器行经皮左心耳封堵术,依据封堵术后是否出现残余分流分为残余分流组与无残余分流组。术前所有患者均行经胸超声心动图（TTE）和TEE检查,排除瓣膜器质性病变及左心耳血栓者。术前TEE测量入选患者的左心耳最大开口径及最大深度;术中TEE引导房间隔穿刺、联合X线血管造影选择封堵器型号,引导封堵传输系统的定位及指导封堵器释放,并评估术中安全性;术后即刻及45 d进行随访超声检查。残余分流组与无残余分流组的最大压缩比及最小压缩比均值比较采用t检验;TEE所测左心耳最大开口径与术中X线造影及最终所选封堵器大小的相关性分析采用Pearson法。 结果54例行左心耳封堵术的患者,均封堵成功,压缩比均在8%~20%之间,残余分流组与无残余分流组组间最大压缩比及最小压缩比均值比较［（17.70±2.28）% vs（17.10±2.42）%,（12.40±2.82）% vs（12.60±2.68）%］,差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）;87%（47/54）的患者左心耳开口径与深度最大值在TEE 135°上获得;TEE 135°上所测LAA开口径与TEE 4个角度上所测最大开口径,TEE测量LAA最大开口径与造影测量LAA开口径,TEE 135°所测LAA开口径与所选封堵器型号,相关性均较好（r=0.919、0.622、0.602,P均<0.001）,相关方程分别为：Y=1.01X＋1.11、Y=0.68X＋6.56、Y=0.80X＋1.24;所有随访患者均未出现脑血管或其他血管栓塞事件,术中出现少量心包腔积液3例,术后7 d复查均未见心包腔积液,2例术后45 d复查封堵器表面出现血栓。 结论TEE在左心耳封堵术前对患者的筛选、术中引导房间隔穿刺、封堵器型号的选择、指导释放过程及即刻评估封堵效果、术后随访中有重要的应用价值,TEE 135°扫查较其他角度检测出残余分流更敏感。     

Intermittent Pacemaker Syndrome: Revision of VVI Pacemaker to a New Cardiac Pacing Mode for Tachy-Brady Syndrome

A patient with tachy-brady syndrome manifested by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and symptomatic sinus bradycardia and treated by VVI pacing developed pacemaker syndrome during episodes of ventricular pacing. His cardiac pacemaker was revised to a dual chamber system utilizing the new AV sequential DDI pacing mode which eliminated pacemaker-related tachycardias and totally abolished the pacemaker syndrome symptoms. There have been no further episodes of atrial fibrillation, possibly due to elimination of temporal dispersion of refractory periods during bradycardia. The propensity for atrial fibrillation has also been minimized by excluding competitive atrial stimulation during DVI pacing. The DDI mode provides the clinician increased utility and flexibility in the use of AV sequential pacing therapy.