A dose escalating study of oxaliplatin and high dose weekly leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of L-OHP plus 5-FU and LV in patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received escalated doses of L-OHP (starting dose 50 mg/m2) as a 2-hour IV infusion on Days 1 and 15, and LV (500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour IV infusion) followed by escalated doses of 5FU (starting dose 1,800 mg/m2) as a 22-hour continuous IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, 21 every 6 weeks. DLTs were evaluated in the first cycle. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients [median age: 66 years; PS (ECOG) 0-1 in 90 percent] were treated on 12 dose-levels. Five (10 percent) patients had received 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, 24 (46 percent) one, and 23 (44 percent) were chemo-na?ve. The DLT was reached at the dose of LOHP 100 mg/m2 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2. Dose-limiting events were G3 diarrhea, G3 asthenia, G4 neutropenia, and G4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 6 (12 percent) patients and Grade 3 fatigue in 6 (12 percent). One (2 percent) patient developed Grade 4 neutropenia and another (2 percent) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: The MTD were L-OHP 95 mg/m2 on d1 and d15 and 5FU 2,200 mg/m2/week for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks.     

Long-term follow-up on National Cancer Institute Phase I/II study of glioblastoma multiforme treated with iododeoxyuridine and hyperfractionated irradiation.

PURPOSE: We report the results of the final phase I/II program in glioblastoma (GBM) multiforme patients using only hyperfractionated irradiation and intravenous iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd). METHODS: For a decade we investigated halogenated pyrimidine radiosensitizers in an effort to exploit the potential for differential uptake of thymidine analogs between proliferating tumor and normal brain tissues. Trials began with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) but were changed to IdUrd when the latter proved less photosensitizing. A series of dose-escalating pilot trials led to treatment at a maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of IdUrd of 1,000 mg/m2/d for two separate 14-day courses, one during the initial radiation field and one during the cone down. The radiotherapy also evolved over time and was hyperfractionated in all cases reported. Over 5 years we accrued 45 patients into the final hyperfractionated, 1,000 mg/m2/d scheme. We report here results on only the patients with minimum follow-up of 1 year (90% had at least 2 years of follow-up) or until death. RESULTS: The results do not indicate a significant benefit for use of sensitizers, as compared with other contemporary and aggressive types of radiation treatment. The median survival has been 11 months, with a 2-year actuarial survival of 9%. As yet, there are no survivors at 3 years. Tumor biopsies at craniotomy showed relatively low sensitizer incorporation. CONCLUSION: The failure of radiosensitizers combined with radiation therapy to show major benefit may be due to patient selection but appears also to be related to the combined problems of poor drug penetration/uptake into tumor, tumor-cell heterogeneity, and a high inherent cellular radioresistance of GBM.     

Phase I trial of sequential administration of raltitrexed (Tomudex) and 5-iodo-2''-deoxyuridine (IdUrd).

Raltitrexed (Tomudex) is a specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase with clinical activity in colorectal cancer. The combination of raltitrexed and 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IdUrd, a cytotoxic pyrimidine analog) resulted in increased IdUrd incorporation into DNA and exhibited in vitrosynergism against colon and bladder human carcinoma cell lines. We designed a phase I trial to determine the MTD, pharmacokinetics, and biologic effects of escalating doses of the combination of IdUrd given as a 24-hour infusion after a raltitrexed 15-minute infusion every three weeks. Thirty-four patients received 95 courses of raltitrexed and IdUrd at doses ranging from raltitrexed 1 mg/m² and IdUrd 750 mg/m² to raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m² and IdUrd 10,400 mg/m².The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range 1–10). Dose limiting hematologic toxicity occurred at doses of raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m² and IdUrd 10,400 mg/m². In addition, we determined the mean plasma concentrations C_ss of IdUrd, the iodouracil level at 22 hours and the IdUrd clearance. Raltitrexed did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of IdUrd in the dose range tested. The recommended phase II dose is raltitrexed 2 mg/m² and IdUrd 10,400 mg/m² repeated every three weeks. Evidence of potential antitumor activity was observed: 1 patient (with colon cancer) had a partial response while 15 others had stable disease.     

Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy, Neutron Boost, and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Anaplastic Astrocytoma and Glioblastoma Multiforme

The survival rate for patients with malignant gliomas is poor. We describe the results of a prospective study using concomitant chemoradiotherapy, neutron boost, and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with malignant gliomas. Forty-two patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were treated with postoperative photon radiation 45 Gy/25 fraction (fxs) with concomitant continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 300 mg/m²/day × 5 days and hydroxyurea 0.5 g orally every 12 hr for 6 days for 5 consecutive weeks, followed by a neutron boost of 450 N cGy/6 fxs delivered twice weekly. Adjuvant chemotherapy with procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV) was given up to 1 year or until tumor progression. Thirty-four patients (81%) had GBM and 8 patients (19%) had AA. Sixteen patients (38%) were ineligible for the neutron boost because of large tumors or poor performance status and instead received a photon boost with concomitant chemotherapy for a total dose of 60-65 Gy to the tumor. The overall median survival is 68 weeks at a median follow-up of 203 weeks (range 166-302 weeks for the 11 patients remaining alive); 7/8 patients with AA are alive, 2 of these with progressive disease. For AA the median survival is not reached at a median follow-up of 203 weeks (range 166-302 weeks for the 7 patients alive with AA). Time to tumor progression for the 1 dead patient with AA was 35 weeks and the other 2 patients failed at 171 weeks and 179 weeks following treatment. The median survival for the 34 patients with GBM was 62 weeks; 4/34 patients with GBM are alive at 285, 238, 216, and 206 weeks. Multivariate survival analysis in the 34 patients with GBM revealed age and Karnofsky performance status as important prognostic factors. Extent of surgery and neutrons did not affect survival. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy was well tolerated by all patients. The only toxicities observed were mucositis × grade II in 3 patients (7%) and mild myelosuppression in 1 patient (2.4%). Adjuvant PCV was well tolerated. Continuous concomitant chemoradiotherapy was well tolerated by all patients with acceptable side effects. The survival rate for the patients with GBM suggests no significant impact on the prognosis for these patients. Patients with AA did well; however, the patient numbers are small.     

A phase I trial of outpatient weekly docetaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for stage III unresectable non small-cell lung cancer: a Vanderbilt Cancer Center Affiliate Network (VCCAN) Trial

Docetaxel has demonstrated activity as a radiosensitizer in numerous preclinical studies, probably due to its role as a cell cycle synchronizer for the G2/M radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of docetaxel with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) to patients with unresectable stage III non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifteen patients were entered into this study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour intravenous (I.V.) infusion, repeated every week for 6 weeks with starting dose of 20 mg/m2. Doses were escalated in 10 mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three new patients, if tolerated. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as grade = 3 nonhematologic or hematologic toxicity according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) toxicity criteria. TRT was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (20 Gy). At the first dose level (20 mg/m2/week), one patient developed grade 4 hyperglycemia and accrual was expanded to five patients. At the second level (30 mg/m2/week), two out of six patients developed grade 3 esophagitis. At the third level (40 mg/m2/week), two out of four patients developed grade 3 esophagitis and one patient developed grade 3 pulmonary toxicity. The weekly docetaxel MTD with concurrent radiation therapy (RT) was found to be 30 mg/m2. The DLT was esophagitis and pulmonary toxicity. Other toxicities encountered included skin reaction, nausea and vomiting, as well as diarrhea. Additionally, there were no treatment-related mortalities or late-occurring toxicities. Esophagitis was the principal DLT of concurrent weekly docetaxel and thoracic radiation in the outpatient setting. The MTD of concurrent weekly docetaxel with TRT is 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks. This study is still open to accrual with weekly docetaxel and TRT in locally advanced NSCLC patients.     

Phase I trial of erlotinib with radiation therapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: results of North Central Cancer Treatment Group protocol N0177

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib plus radiation therapy (RT) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a multicenter phase I trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were stratified on the basis of the use of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs). After resection or biopsy, patients were treated with erlotinib for 1 week before concurrent erlotinib and 6 weeks (60 Gy) of RT and maintained on erlotinib until progression. The erlotinib dose was escalated in cohorts of 3 starting at 100 mg/day. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled and 19 were evaluable for the MTD and efficacy endpoints. Of these patients, 14 were males and 5 were females, with a median age of 54 years. Seven had undergone biopsy only, 5 had subtotal resections, and 7 had gross total resections. The highest dose level was 150 mg/day erlotinib for patients not on EIACs (Group 1) and 200 mg/day for patients on EIACs (Group 2). MTD was not reached in either group. In Group 1 at 100 mg (n=6) and at 150 mg (n=4), only 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred (stomatitis at 100 mg). No DLTs have occurred in Group 2 at 100 mg (n=3), 150 mg (n=3), and 200 mg (n=3). With a median follow-up of 52 weeks, progression was documented in 16 patients and 13 deaths occurred. Median time to progression was 26 weeks, and median survival was 55 weeks. CONCLUSION: Toxicity is acceptable at the current doses of erlotinib plus RT. The study was modified to include concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, and accrual is in progress.     

Survival Results from a Phase I Study of Etanidazole (SR2508) and Radiotherapy in Patients with Malignant Glioma

Purpose: To report the survival results from a previous Phase I study of etanidazole (ETA) and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM n = 50) or anaplastic astrocytoma (AA n = 19) and examine survival according to age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and implant status.Patients and Methods: In a previous Phase I study, 70 previously untreated patients (median age 49) with malignant gliomas were accrued. One patient was excluded from analysis because pathology was unverifiable. All had KPS ≥ 70. Prior to initiation of treatment, patients were stratified according to whether they were candidates for interstitial implantation. The implant patients (IMP n = 14) received accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (XRT) 2 Gy BID (6 hours apart) to 40 Gy in 2 weeks with ETA 2 gm/m² × 6 doses, a 2 week break, and then interstitial implant for an additional 50 Gy (4–7 days) with a continuous infusion of ETA over 90–96 hours. There were 55 patients treated on two sequentially conducted non-implant arms. These patients started with accelerated fractionation XRT 2 Gy BID (6 hours apart) to 40 Gy in 2 weeks with ETA 2 gm/m² × 4–5 doses/week. Non-IMP1 arm (n = 41) received a 2-week break before standard fractionated boost XRT of 2 Gy/day for 2 weeks to a total dose of 60 Gy with ETA. Non-IMP2 arm (n = 14) did not have the 2-week break. All patients had plasma pharmacokinetic monitoring of ETA. Subsequent follow-up study provided information regarding long-term survival status of this group of patients. The Phase I toxicity evaluation was conducted according to the RTOG toxicity scale and was found well tolerated in both groups. Overall actuarial survival was plotted for all patients, by histologic group, and by implant status. Subset analyses of GBM patients by age (≤ 49 or > 49 years), KPS (≤ 80 or > 80) and implant versus non-implant were also performed.Results: Median survival of GBM patients was 1.1 years and that of anaplastic astrocytoma patients was 3.1 years (p = 0.0001). In GBM patients, KPS > 80, implanted patients, and age ≤ 49 were factors found not to be associated with a statistically improved survival.Conclusion: The results of survival in this Phase I etanidazole study of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma are comparable to the results from other studies using bromodeoxyuridine, iododeoxyuridine, or procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine. The use of etanidazole with accelerated radiotherapy does not appear to improve survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme compared to those treated with conventional therapies.     

Stereotactic injection of DTI-015 into recurrent malignant gliomas: phase I/II trial

DTI-015 (BCNU in 100% ethanol) utilizes solvent facilitated perfusion for the intratumoral treatment of gliomas. The ethanol solvent vehicle facilitates a rapid and thorough saturation of the tumor with the dissolved anticancer agent BCNU. We conducted a phase I/II dose escalation study of DTI-015 in 40 heavily pretreated patients with inoperable recurrent malignant glioma. The study goals were to establish a maximally tolerated dose (MTD) for DTI-015 and assess its safety and activity. Patients received stereotactic intratumoral injection of DTI-015 under magnetic resonance imaging guidance. Dose escalation was performed in two phases. First, DTI-015 volume was escalated at a set BCNU concentration of 12.5 mg/ml; second, BCNU mg dose was escalated by increasing BCNU concentration to 30, 45, 60, and 75 mg/ml. A MTD of 5 ml and 240 mg was established. Twenty-five of 28 DTI-015 treatments (89%) using 相似文献   

Phase I study of thoracic radiation dose escalation with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with limited small-cell lung cancer: Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 97-12

PURPOSE: The purpose of RTOG 97-12 was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of thoracic radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients received four cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v.) and etoposide (120 mg/m(2) i.v. Days 1-3) (PE), with concurrent thoracic RT starting on Day 1. Thoracic RT was given during the first two cycles with 1.8 Gy/fraction daily to the clinical target volume, followed by thoracic RT to the gross tumor volume b.i.d. for the last 3, 5, 7, 9, or 11 treatment days (total dose 50.4, 54.0, 57.6, 61.2, or 64.8 Gy, respectively). The MTD was based on the dose that produced Grades 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity (mainly esophagitis and pneumonitis) in greater than 50% of patients. RESULTS: After the first 8 patients were enrolled in Arm 1, administration of etoposide was changed from 120 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 2 and 3 of each cycle to 240 mg/m(2) p.o. for patient convenience as outpatients. Total thoracic RT doses from 50.4 Gy to 61.2 Gy over 5 weeks given with PE were well tolerated. Three of the first 5 patients in the 64.8 Gy arm developed Grade 3 acute esophagitis; the MTD was determined to be 61.2 Gy. Fifty-four (87%) of the 62 evaluable patients achieved a complete (68%) or partial (19%) tumor response. The 18-month survival was 25% for patients receiving 50.4 Gy and 82% for those receiving 61.2 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for this accelerated thoracic RT regimen with concurrent PE was 61.2 Gy over 5 weeks.     

Combined-modality therapy with gemcitabine and radiotherapy as a bladder preservation strategy: results of a phase I trial.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine given twice weekly with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients underwent maximal transurethral resection of their bladder tumors followed by twice-weekly infusion of gemcitabine with 2 Gy/d concurrent radiotherapy to the bladder, for a total of 60 Gy over 6 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 10 mg/m(2) with subsequent dose levels of 20, 27, 30, and 33 mg/m(2). The primary end point was the determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of twice weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of toxicity associated with combined-modality therapy and initial assessment of the rate of bladder preservation. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and 23 were assessable for toxicity and response. No significant toxicity was demonstrated at the 10 or 20 mg/m(2) twice-weekly doses. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in two of three patients treated at 33 mg/m(2). Intermediate dose levels of 27 and 30 mg/m(2) were then evaluated. The MTD of gemcitabine was 27 mg/m(2). The DLT was systemic, manifested as an elevation in liver function tests, malaise, and edema. Fifteen of 23 patients (65%) are alive with bladders intact and no evidence of recurrent disease at a median follow-up of 43 months. CONCLUSION: Twice-weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy at 2 Gy/d to a total dose of 60 Gy is well-tolerated. The MTD of gemcitabine is 27 mg/m(2). There is a high rate of bladder preservation in this selected group of patients.     

A phase I dose escalation study of continuous oral capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and pelvic radiation (XELOX-RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous oral capecitabine plus oxaliplatin and pre-operative pelvic radiotherapy (XELOX-RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinically unresectable rectal cancer or for whom resection with histologically clear (R0) surgical margins was unlikely received continuous capecitabine (500-825 mg/m2 twice daily, 7 days/week), oxaliplatin 2-h intravenous infusion (130 mg/m2 days 1 and 29) and pelvic radiotherapy (Monday-Friday for 5 weeks, total dose 45 Gy in 25 daily 1.8 Gy fractions). The MTD was the capecitabine dose causing dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities) in one-third or more of patients treated per dose level. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received three dose levels. The MTD was capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily: DLTs occurred in two of six patients (grade 3 diarrhoea, rectal pain with local skin reaction). No DLTs occurred in six patients receiving capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice daily. Grade 3/4 toxicity was rare, with minimal myelosuppression. Although predominantly a dose-finding study, XELOX-RT showed promising activity. Fourteen patients had histologically confirmed R0 resections and five had a pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for further study is capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice daily with oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. XELOX-RT showed promising antitumour activity. Further evaluation is underway.     

A Phase I Trial of Outpatient Weekly Docetaxel and Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Stage III Unresectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Vanderbuilt Cancer Center Affiliate Network (VCCAN) Trial

Docetaxel has demonstrated activity as a radiosensitizer in numerous preclinical studies, probably due to its role as a cell cycle synchronizer for the G2/M radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of docetaxel with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) to patients with unresectable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifteen patients were entered into this study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour intravenous (I.V.) infusion, repeated every week for 6 weeks with starting dose of 20 mg/m². Doses were escalated in 10 mg/m² increments in successive cohorts of three new patients, if tolerated. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as grade ≤ 3 nonhematologic or hematologic toxicity according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) toxicity criteria. TRT was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (20 Gy). At the first dose level (20 mg/m²/week), one patient developed grade 4 hyperglycemia and accrual was expanded to five patients. At the second level (30 mg/m²/week), two out of six patients developed grade 3 esophagitis. At the third level (40 mg/m²/week), two out of four patients developed grade 3 esophagitis and one patient developed grade 3 pulmonary toxicity. The weekly docetaxel MTD with concurrent radiation therapy (RT) was found to be 30 mg/m². The DLT was esophagitis and pulmonary toxicity. Other toxicities encountered included skin reaction, nausea and vomiting, as well as diarrhea. Additionally, there were no treatment-related mortalities or late-occurring toxicities. Esophagitis was the principal DLT of concurrent weekly docetaxel and thoracic radiation in the outpatient setting. The MTD of concurrent weekly docetaxel with TRT is 30 mg/m² weekly for 6 weeks. This study is still open to accrual with weekly docetaxel and TRT in locally advanced NSCLC patients.     

A phase I trial of 96-hour paclitaxel infusion plus accelerated radiotherapy of unrespectable head and neck cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel given as a 96-hour continuous infusion during Weeks 1 and 5 of an accelerated radiotherapy schedule for the definitive treatment of advanced (nonmetastatic) unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen patients with Stage IV SCCHN were enrolled. Radiotherapy consisted of 70-72 Gy over 6 weeks, with a fractionation scheme of 2 Gy q.d. for 4 weeks followed by 1.6 Gy b.i.d. for 2 weeks, with no planned interruptions. Paclitaxel was administered over a 96-hour continuous infusion during Weeks 1 and 5 of radiotherapy at the following dose levels: Dose Level 1: 40 mg/m(2)/96-hours (3 patients); Dose Level 2: 80 mg/m(2)/96-hrs (5 patients); Dose Level 3: 120 mg/m(2)/96-hours (2 patients); and Dose Level 2A: 100 mg/m(2)/96-hours (3 patients). RESULTS: The MTD of Paclitaxel was 100 mg/m(2)/96-hours. All but one patient (who experienced progressive disease after receiving 61 Gy and both cycles of paclitaxel) completed therapy as planned. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in both patients enrolled at Dose Level 3, with one patient experiencing Grade 4 diffuse moist desquamation and the other patient experiencing Grade 4 mucositis and febrile neutropenia. Thus, Dose Level 2A was opened and no dose limiting toxicity was noted. Grade 3 non-dose limiting mucositis and dermatitis occurred at all paclitaxel dose levels. There were no treatment-related deaths. All Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reversible. Complete responses were seen in 8 of 13 patients, 4 patients achieved partial responses, and 1 patient had no response/progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Infusional paclitaxel over 96 hours during Weeks 1 and 5 of this accelerated radiotherapy schedule is feasible. The MTD of paclitaxel in this protocol was 100 mg/m(2)/96-hours. Dose-limiting toxicities were primarily enhanced epithelial reactions, but febrile neutropenia also occurred. All patients develop non-dose limiting Grade 3 skin and mucosal reactions, reflecting the high treatment intensity. This regimen merits further investigation.     

Radiation therapy and concurrent fixed dose amifostine with escalating doses of twice-weekly gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of twice-weekly gemcitabine (TW-G) when administered in conjunction with fixed dose amifostine (A) during external radiotherapy (RT) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, or asymptomatic-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. RT was delivered by using the standard four-field technique (1.8 Gy daily fractions, 45 Gy followed by a boost of 5.4 Gy, in 5-1/2 weeks). The starting dose of TW-G was 60 mg/m(2) (i.v., 30-min infusion), which is equal to the upper limit of previously reported MTD of TW-G when given without A during RT. A was given just before the TW-G, at a fixed dose of 340 mg/m(2) (i.v., rapid infusion). TW-G doses were escalated by 30-mg/m(2) increments in successive cohorts of 3 to 6 additional patients until DLT was observed. Toxicities were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. RESULTS: In general, therapy was well tolerated in patients treated at the first two dose levels of 60 mg/m(2) and 90 mg/m(2). The DLT of TW-G given in conjunction with A during RT were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea/vomiting at the dose level of 120 mg/m(2). Of the 10 patients eligible for a median follow-up of 10 months, 5 remain alive; 1 complete responder, 3 partial responders, and 1 with stable disease. CONCLUSION: A dose of TW-G at a level of 90 mg/m(2) produced tolerable toxicity and it may possess significant activity when delivered in conjunction with 340 mg/m(2) dose of A during RT of the upper abdomen. Due to the higher MTD of TW-G seen in our study, we consider that the A supplementation may optimize the therapeutic index of TW-G-based chemoradiotherapy protocols in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.     

Phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To report the evidence of a phase I trial planned to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and related toxicity of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with non--small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, the response to treatment was evaluated and reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC deemed unresectable because of advanced stage were observed and treated according to a combined chemoradiation protocol with GEM as chemotherapeutic agent. GEM was given weekly for 5 consecutive weeks as a 30-minute intravenous infusion concurrent with radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/d; total dose, 50.4 Gy). The initial dose was 100 mg/m(2). Pulmonary, esophageal, cardiac, hematologic, and skin toxicities were assessed. The dose of GEM was increased by 50 mg/m(2) up to a dose of 250 mg/m(2); an additional increase by 25 mg/m(2) up to the MTD was planned and realized. Three patients were enrolled for each dose level. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity was identified for the 375-mg/m(2) level with two episodes of grade 2 esophagitis and two of grade 3 pulmonary actinic interstitial disease. The weekly dose of GEM 350 mg/m(2) was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A weekly GEM dose of 350 mg/m(2) concurrent with radiotherapy was well tolerated. Promising results regarding response to treatment were observed and reported.     

Phase I trial of hepatic artery infusion of 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced hepatic malignancy: biochemically based combination chemotherapy

Eighteen patients with hepatic metastases primarily from colorectal carcinoma were treated on a phase I protocol employing hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of 5-fluorouracil (FUra) and 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IdUrd) via implantable infusion pump. Patients received a 14-day continuous HAI of 300 mg/day FUra. During days 8-14 of therapy, patients received IdUrd as a separate 3-h HAI daily x 7. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. IdUrd was escalated from 0.1 to 2.86 mg/kg/day x 7. Myelosuppression and stomatitis were mild and not dose limiting. Hepatotoxicity was dose limiting and similar to that reported for 5-fluoro-2'deoxyuridine alone administered as a 14-day infusion every month. One patient developed a clinical picture consistent with sclerosing cholangitis and another had biopsy-proven cholestasis and triaditis. Catheter complications occurred in 7 of 18 patients. Plasma concentrations of FUra during the 7-day continuous HAI of FUra alone were consistently either undetectable or very low (less than or equal to 0.1 microM). At level 3 (1.0 mg/kg/day IdUrd) and beyond, measurable plasma concentrations of FUra, iodouracil, and IdUrd were found at the end of the daily 3-h infusion of IdUrd. The maximum tolerated dose of IdUrd as administered in this trial is 2.2 mg/kg/day x 7 and the recommended starting dose for further clinical investigation is 1.7 mg/kg/day x 7.     

Phase I safety study of escalating doses of atrasentan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma

Atrasentan is an oral selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist that may inhibit cell proliferation and interfere with angiogenesis during glioma growth. We conducted a dose-finding study to assess atrasentan's safety and toxicity and to gather preliminary evidence of efficacy. Patients with recurrent malignant glioma received oral atrasentan at >or=10 mg/day. We increased the dose among cohorts until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Patients were evaluated for response every 8 weeks and remained on the study until the tumor progressed or toxicities occurred. Twenty-five patients were enrolled, with a median age of 53 years (range, 25-70) and a median KPS of 90% (range, 60-100%). Twenty-two patients had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), 2 had anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 had an anaplastic oliogodendroglioma; 24 patients had received one prior chemo therapy regimen before being enrolled in the study. The most common atrasentan-related toxicities were grade 1 or 2 rhinitis, fatigue, and edema. One patient developed grade 3 hypoxia and peripheral edema at a dose of 90 mg/day. We observed no dose-limiting toxicities in an expanded cohort of 10 patients at 70 mg/day, which was declared the MTD. Two partial responses (8%) were seen in patients with GBM at the 70- and 90-mg/day dose levels, and 4 patients had stable disease before progressing. Nineteen patients have died, and median survival was 6.0 months (95% confidence interval, 4.2-9.5 months). We conclude that the MTD of daily oral atrasentan in patients with recurrent malignant glioma is 70 mg/day. Further study of atrasentan with radiation therapy and temozolomide in newly diagnosed GBM is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this novel agent.     

Phase I trial of combined-modality therapy for localized esophageal cancer: escalating doses of continuous-infusion paclitaxel with cisplatin and concurrent radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel when given as a weekly 96-hour infusion with cisplatin and radiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer and three patients with local recurrence or positive resection margins were treated. Weekly paclitaxel doses of 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 80 mg/m(2), given as a continuous 96-hour infusion, were administered with weekly cisplatin, 30 mg/m(2) on day 1, weeks 1 to 6, and concurrent radiation (50.4 Gy). Plasma paclitaxel steady-state levels were measured. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity, defined as a treatment break longer than 2 weeks for toxicity, occurred in one patient in the 80-mg/m(2)/wk dose level. Major causes for any (including < or = 2 weeks) treatment breaks were mediport complications and neutropenic fever, which occurred mostly at that dose level. At a paclitaxel dose of 60 mg/m(2)/wk, myelosuppression, mostly neutropenia, was relatively mild and transient; stomatitis, esophagitis, diarrhea. and peripheral neuropathy were uncommon and usually of grade 2 or less. Therefore, the MTD was established at 60 mg/m(2)/wk. The mean steady-state concentration of paclitaxel at the MTD was 17.2 nmol/L. Complete (R0) resection was possible in 16 (73%) of 22 patients who underwent subsequent surgery, and the pathologic complete response rate was 24%. CONCLUSION: Weekly, 96-hour infusion of paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2)/wk, given with concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy, is a safe and tolerable regimen for patients with localized esophageal cancer. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging. This regimen is the basis of ongoing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase II randomized trials in esophageal and gastric cancers.     

A phase II trial of accelerated radiotherapy using weekly stereotactic conformal boost for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: RTOG 0023

PURPOSE: This phase II trial was performed to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of dose-intense accelerated radiation therapy using weekly fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) boost for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with histologically confirmed GBM with postoperative enhancing tumor plus tumor cavity diameter <60 mm were enrolled. A 50-Gy dose of standard radiation therapy (RT) was given in daily 2-Gy fractions. In addition, patients received four FSRT treatments, once weekly, during Weeks 3 to 6. FSRT dosing of either 5 Gy or 7 Gy per fraction was given for a cumulative dose of 70 or 78 Gy in 29 (25 standard RT + 4 FSRT) treatments over 6 weeks. After the RT course, carmustine (BCNU) at 80 mg/m(2) was given for 3 days, every 8 weeks, for 6 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were analyzed. Toxicity included: 3 Grade 4 chemotherapy, 3 acute Grade 4 radiotherapy, and 1 Grade 3 late. The median survival time was 12.5 months. No survival difference is seen when compared with the RTOG historical database. Patients with gross total resection (41%) had a median survival time of 16.6 months vs. 12.0 months for historic controls with gross total resection (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: This first, multi-institutional FSRT boost trial for GBM was feasible and well tolerated. There is no significant survival benefit using this dose-intense RT regimen. Subset analysis revealed a trend toward improved outcome for GTR patients suggesting that patients with minimal disease burden may benefit from this form of accelerated RT.     

CPT-11联合CF/5-FU方案治疗胃肠道癌的Ⅰ期临床研究

目的探索CPT-11(开普拓)联合CF/5-FU治疗胃肠道癌的最大耐受剂量(MTD)和剂量限制性毒性(DLT).方法 CPT-11初始剂量为120mg/m2,然后150mg/m2,180mg/m2和200mg/m2 iv d1,递增剂量直至出现DLT.CF 200mg/m2iv 2h,然后5-FU 400mg/m2快速静滴,接着5-FU 600mg/m2持续静滴22h,第1天、第2天给药,2周重复.结果 20例胃肠道癌患者共完成化疗111周期,中位数6周期.MTD为200mg/m2,DLT为腹泻和WBC减少.结论我们推荐CPT-11180mg/m2联合CF/5-FR每2周重复的方法,作为国内PS为0～1胃肠癌患者的一线二线化疗方案.