Diagnostic Efficacy of PSMA and PSCA mRNAs Combined to PSA in Prostate Cancer Patients

Background: Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been used for screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) but it is burdened by its low accuracy, creating a need for reliable diagnostic markers. Despite prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) being widely expressed in the tissue of PCa, no definite conclusion regarding their use as clinical biomarkers due to their lacking organ specificity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the peripheral blood levels of PSMA and PSCA mRNAs and examine their diagnostic significance as non-invasive integrated markers.Materials and Methods: 125 subjects were enrolled in this study. They were divided into 25 healthy controls, 25 BPH patients, and 75 PCa patients. The expression levels of PSMA and PSCA were determined using quantitative RT- PCR, in addition to measuring serum PSA.Results: Levels of PSMA and PSCA were over-expressed in PCa patients compared to controls and BPH patients and were found to be associated with increased susceptibility to PCa. Moreover, the diagnostic values of PSMA and PSCA to distinguish PCa patients from BPH patients and controls were inferior to that of PSA. However, the combination of PSMA and PSCA with PSA enhanced the efficacy of the latter.Conclusion: This study suggests that these genes were associated with malignant susceptibility. Concerning the duality of PSMA-PSA or PSCA-PSA, this implies the significance of their investigation together in peripheral blood of prostate patients.     

前列腺特异性膜抗原在前列腺癌患者外周血和组织中的表达及意义

目的探讨前列腺特异性膜抗原（PSMA）在前列腺癌患者（PCa）外周血和组织中的表达及其与肿瘤病理分级和临床分期之间的关系。方法采用RT-PCR方法检测前列腺特异性膜抗原（PSMA）在前列腺癌和良性增生患者外周血清中的表达;采用免疫组化法观察PSMA在前列腺不同病变组织中的表达。前列腺癌28例,前列腺上皮内瘤（PIN）7例,良性前列腺增生（BPH）30例。结果血清学检测显示PSMA mRNA在前列腺癌和良性病变组（包括PIN和BPH）患者外周血中阳性率分别为67.9%和8.1%,两者差异具有显著性（P〈0.01）。在局限性癌、局部进展性癌和远处转移癌患者外周血肿瘤细胞中,PSMA mRNA的阳性率分别为58.3%、66.7%和85.7%,随前列腺癌临床分期的进展而逐渐递增（P〈0.05）。在高分化、中分化和低分化前列腺癌中,PSMA mRNA的阳性率分别为87.5%、62.5%和50%,肿瘤分化越差,其阳性率越低（P〈0.05）。组织学检测显示PSMA在PCa、PIN、BPH三种不同前列腺病变组织中的阳性率分别为60.7%、28.6%和20.0%（P〈0.05）,在高、中、低分化前列腺癌组织中PSMA的阳性率分别为100.0%、50.0%和25.0%,与肿瘤Gleason评分之间呈负相关（P〈0.05）。在局限性癌、局部进展性癌和远处转移癌患者肿瘤组织中,PSMA的阳性率分别为58.3%（7/12）、77.8%（7/9）和42.9%（3/7）（P〉0.05）。结论PSMA在前列腺癌组织中明显高表达,并且表达量与前列腺癌临床分期和分化程度（组织学分级）密切相关;检测PSMA可能对前列腺癌诊断、治疗方案的选择及预后评估具有重要价值。     

前列腺特异性抗原人类激肽释放酶2和前列腺特异的膜抗原在前列腺癌患者外周血表达的临床意义

目的　探讨检测前列腺癌微转移的灵敏和特异性指标。方法　从 5 1例前列腺癌、33例前列腺增生 (BPH)患者及 32名正常人的外周血中分离单个核细胞 ,用巢式RT PCR方法检测其中前列腺上皮细胞前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA)、人类激肽释放酶 2 (hK2 )和前列腺特异的膜抗原 (PSMA)的表达。结果　PSA、hK2和PSMA在前列腺癌患者外周血中检出的阳性率分别为 5 2 .9%、4 3.1%和6 4 .7% ;正常人和BPH患者假阳性率分别为 6 .2 %、7.7%和 4 .6 % ,3项指标差异均有显著性 (P <0 .0 1)。各临床分期 (局限癌、侵袭性癌和转移癌 )间 ,PSA和hK2的阳性检出率差异无显著性 ;PSMA在各期前列腺癌中阳性检出率均较PSA和hK2高 ,且随临床分期进展 ,其阳性检出率亦增加 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论PSMA对前列腺癌诊断、治疗方案的选择及预后评估较PSA和hK2有更大的价值     

Human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: molecular dissection by gene expression profiling.

Critical aspects of the biology and molecular basis for prostate malignancy remain poorly understood. To reveal fundamental differences between benign and malignant growth of prostate cells, we performed gene expression profiling of primary human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using cDNA microarrays consisting of 6500 human genes. Frozen prostate specimens were processed to facilitate extraction of RNA from regions of tissue enriched in either benign or malignant epithelial cell growth within a given specimen. Gene expression in each of the 16 prostate cancer and nine BPH specimens was compared with a common reference to generate normalized measures for each gene across all of the samples. Using an analysis of complete pairwise comparisons of expression profiles among all of the samples, we observed clearly discernable patterns of overall gene expression that differentiated prostate cancer from BPH. Further analysis of the data identified 210 genes with statistically significant differences in expression between prostate cancer and BPH. These genes include many not recognized previously as differentially expressed in prostate cancer and BPH, including hepsin, which codes for a transmembrane serine protease. This study reveals for the first time that significant and widespread differences in gene expression patterns exist between benign and malignant growth of the prostate gland. Gene expression analysis of prostate tissues should help to disclose the molecular mechanisms underlying prostate malignant growth and identify molecular markers for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic use.     

Use of multiple biomarkers for a molecular diagnosis of prostate cancer

The identification of biomarkers capable of providing a reliable molecular diagnostic test for prostate cancer (PCa) is highly desirable clinically. We describe here 4 biomarkers, UDP-N-Acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine transferase (GalNAc-T3; not previously associated with PCa), PSMA, Hepsin and DD3/PCA3, which, in combination, distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). GalNAc-T3 was identified as overexpressed in PCa tissues by microarray analysis, confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR and shown immunohistochemically to be localised to prostate epithelial cells with higher expression in malignant cells. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis across 21 PCa and 34 BPH tissues showed 4.6-fold overexpression of GalNAc-T3 (p = 0.005). The noncoding mRNA (DD3/PCA3) was overexpressed 140-fold (p = 0.007) in the cancer samples compared to BPH tissues. Hepsin was overexpressed 21-fold (p = 0.049, whereas the overexpression for PSMA was 66-fold (p = 0.047). When the gene expression data for these 4 biomarkers was combined in a logistic regression model, a predictive index was obtained that distinguished 100% of the PCa samples from all of the BPH samples. Therefore, combining these genes in a real-time PCR assay represents a powerful new approach to diagnosing PCa by molecular profiling. (Supplemental material for this article can be found on the International Journal of Cancer website at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0020-7136/suppmat/index.html.)     

Cell-free DNA and RNA in plasma as a new molecular marker for prostate cancer

Extracellular nucleic acids could serve as molecular markers in the early detection of cancer and in the prediction of disease outcome. In this study we examined six molecular markers, such as: variations in the quantity of DNA in plasma, glutathione-S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene methylation status in plasma, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and plasma samples from prostate cancer patients in different stages. The combination of DNA load and GSTP1 promoter methylation status identified 83% (10/12) of the prostate cancer patients before therapy. This study shows that free circulating DNA can be detected in patients with prostate cancer compared with disease-free individuals, and suggests a new, noninvasive approach for early detection of prostate cancer.     

Expression analysis onto microarrays of randomly selected cDNA clones highlights HOXB13 as a marker of human prostate cancer

In a strategy aimed at identifying novel markers of human prostate cancer, we performed expression analysis using microarrays of clones randomly selected from a cDNA library prepared from the LNCaP prostate cancer cell line. Comparisons of expression profiles in primary human prostate cancer, adjacent normal prostate tissue, and a selection of other (nonprostate) normal human tissues, led to the identification of a set of clones that were judged as the best candidate markers of normal and/or malignant prostate tissue. DNA sequencing of the selected clones revealed that they included 10 genes that had previously been established as prostate markers: NKX3.1, KLK2, KLK3 (PSA), FOLH1 (PSMA), STEAP2, PSGR, PRAC, RDH11, Prostein and FASN. Following analysis of the expression patterns of all selected and sequenced genes through interrogation of SAGE databases, a further three genes from our clone set, HOXB13, SPON2 and NCAM2, emerged as additional candidate markers of human prostate cancer. Quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated the specificity of expression of HOXB13 in prostate tissue and revealed its ubiquitous expression in a series of 37 primary prostate cancers and 20 normal prostates. These results demonstrate the utility of this expression-microarray approach in hunting for new markers of individual human cancer types.     

Abnormal E-cadherin expression and prostate cell blood dissemination as markers of biological recurrence in cancer

Until now, no molecular parameter has been available for predicting the metastatic potential of prostate tumours, which leaves their outcome uncertain despite an apparent benign histology or early stage. Abnormal expression of adhesion molecules, such as E-cadherin, can be contributing factors for increased invasiveness and metastatic potential. Histological analysis for E-cadherin expression was carried out on paraffin-embedded tumour tissues. Tumour metastatic potential was indirectly evaluated by detecting circulating prostate cells (CPC), using reverse transciptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a target. Patients were followed-up for a median of 14 months (range 10--19 months) after surgery with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measurement. Interestingly, 23 of 44 localised tumours exhibited aberrant E-cadherin expression. Prior to primary surgery, PSMA RT-PCR detected the spread of prostate cells to the blood in 24 patients. Statistical analysis showed that abnormal E-cadherin expression in the tumours was the only variable that was independently correlated with prostate cell dissemination in the blood (P<0.0001). In logistic regression analysis, abnormal E-cadherin expression was a significant independent predictor for a later biological relapse. This impaired adhesion status was clearly correlated with a haematogenous spread of the primary tumour cells. It could therefore be an objective way to restrict the indications for radical surgery to patients not presenting with this feature.     

前列腺特异膜抗原对前列腺疾病的临床诊断意义

目的评价血清中前列腺特异膜抗原（PSMA）浓度对前列腺疾病的辅助诊断意义。方法采用Western印迹分析检测患者血清中PSMA的浓度,前列腺特异抗原（PSA）检测采用通用的免疫化学发光法检测。分析二者在不同分组中的浓度差异及相关性。结果前列腺癌患者的血清中PSMA浓度显著高于正常人群,良性前列腺增生和前列腺炎的患者则低于正常人群,而PSA浓度无论是前列腺癌还是前列腺良性病变均高于正常人。结论前列腺特异膜抗原浓度可以作为区分前列腺癌和良性前列腺增生的辅助诊断标志物。     

前列腺特异性膜抗原和前列腺特异性抗原表达强度与前列腺癌Gleason评分之间的相关性研究

目的研究前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的表达强度与前列腺癌Gleason评分之间的相关性。方法制备抗PSMA膜外段表位的单克隆抗体,应用免疫组织化学方法检测前列腺癌中PSMA的表达,统计分析其与Gleason评分之间的相关性,并和PSA与Gleason评分之间的相关性进行对比。结果制备出8株分泌抗PSMA膜外段表位的单抗的杂交瘤细胞株。免疫组化结果表明,PSMA的表达强度与前列腺癌的Gleason评分之间存在相关性。在分化差的前列腺癌中,PSMA水平高于分化中等和分化良好的前列腺癌(P<0.01),而PSA在前列腺癌中的表达无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论PSMA表达水平在分化差的前列腺癌中明显升高,与Gleason评分存在相关性,可以作为前列腺癌的Gleason分级的标记物,提示PSMA可以作为对激素疗法效果不敏感的低分化前列腺癌抗体介导的免疫治疗靶点。     

Murine six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate, prostate stem cell antigen, and prostate-specific membrane antigen: prostate-specific cell-surface antigens highly expressed in prostate cancer of transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate mice

To identify genes that are differentially up-regulated in prostate cancer of transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice, we subtracted cDNA isolated from mouse kidney and spleen from cDNA isolated from TRAMP-C1 cells, a prostate tumor cell line derived from a TRAMP mouse. Using this strategy, cDNA clones that were homologous to human six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate (STEAP) and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) were isolated. Mouse STEAP (mSteap) is 80% homologous to human STEAP at both the nucleotide and amino acid levels and contains six potential membrane-spanning regions similar to human STEAP. Mouse PSCA (mPsca) shares 65% homology with human PSCA at the nucleotide and amino acid levels. mRNA expression of mSteap and mPsca is largely prostate-specific and highly detected in primary prostate tumors and metastases of TRAMP mice. Both mSteap and mPsca map to chromosome 5. Another known gene coding for mouse prostate-specific membrane antigen (mPsma) is also highly expressed in both primary and metastatic lesions of TRAMP mice. These results indicate that the TRAMP mouse model can be used to effectively identify genes homologous to human prostate-specific genes, thereby allowing for the investigation of their functional roles in prostate cancer. mSteap, mPsca, and mPsma constitute new tools for preventative and/or therapeutic vaccine construction and immune monitoring in the TRAMP mouse model that may provide insights into the treatment of human prostate cancer.     

Detection and characterization of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in tissue extracts and body fluids

The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) glycoprotein is recognized by the monoclonal antibody (MAb) 7EII -C5.3 as a predominant 100 kDa and minor 180 kDa component in LNCaP cell line extracts and its expression has been shown by immunohistochemistry to be highly restricted to prostate epithelium. The aim of the present study was to utilize Western blot analysis to determine if PSMA could be detected in human tissue extracts and body fluids and if so, which molecular forms were present. PSMA was detected as 120 and 200 kDa bands in normal, benign and malignant prostate tissues and seminal plasma. Further analysis demonstrated that the larger molecular form of PSMA may be a dimer of the lower m.w. species. The PSMA glycoprotein was not detected in the majority of non- prostate tissue extracts examined except for a low yet significant amount in normal salivary gland, brain and small intestine, suggesting that PSMA may not be as prostate-specific as originally thought. Since the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be maximally shed into the serum in high-grade and metastatic prostate carcinomas, it was surprising that PSMA could not be detected in serum by Western blot analysis even in patients with actively progressive metastatic disease. Second generation antibodies generated against different epitopes may be required to determine if PSMA is shed into serum. Our results support the hypothesis that PSMA is a novel prostate biomarker. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

90例结直肠癌中前列腺特异性膜抗原的表达研究

  目的  探讨结直肠癌（colorectal cancer,CRC）患者中前列腺特异性膜抗原（prostate-specific membrane antigen,PSMA）的表达及临床病理影响因素。  方法  选取90例CRC患者的组织切片,应用免疫组织化学检测癌组织和癌旁正常组织的PSMA、血管标志蛋白CD31的表达水平,并对PSMA的表达水平与CRC临床病理因素的关系进行分析。  结果  PSMA在正常结直肠组织中免疫组织化学染色为阴性,在CRC组织中有较高比例免疫组织化学染色。但染色阳性部位不在肿瘤细胞,而是在肿瘤新生血管内皮细胞,总染色率为76.7%。PSMA染色评分在不同年龄及组织学类型中具有显著性差异,高年龄组（≥60岁）及普通型腺癌组的PSMA染色评分更高（P < 0.05）。  结论  PSMA在90例CRC患者中高比例表达,表达部位为肿瘤新生血管内皮细胞,与部分临床病理因素有关,可能成为CRC诊断及治疗的特异性标志物。      

f/T-PSA比值和PSA密度对TPSA灰区前列腺癌的诊断意义

目的探讨游离前列腺特异抗原/总前列腺特异抗原(fPSA/TPSA,f/T)比值和TPSA灰区前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)(4.0~10.0ng/m l)对诊断前列腺癌的临床意义。方法回顾性分析TPSA在灰区的38例前列腺癌和56例良性前列腺增生症血清PSA相关检测结果,将两组患者f/T比值和PSAD值进行对比分析。结果两组患者TPSA值无显著性差异(P=0.337);f/T比值(P=0.001)和PSAD值(P=0.012)有显著性差异。f/T比值在前列腺癌患者中较低,而PSAD值较高。当f/T比值和PSAD分别以0.15和0.16作为临界值时,其诊断前列腺癌的灵敏度和特异度分别为81.6%和75.0%、65.8%和57.1%。结论f/T比值和PSAD对TPSA灰区的前列腺癌的诊断有重要的临床意义。     

Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The restricted expression of the surface glycoprotein prostrate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) to normal prostate tissue, primary and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), and the neovasculature of various nonprostatic epithelial malignancies has enabled targeting strategies for PCa treatment using anti-PSMA antibodies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using prostatectomy specimens, immunohistochemical staining for PSMA (7E11 antibody) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of 136 cases of PCa. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was scored for intensity and distribution, and results were correlated with tumor grade, pathological stage, DNA ploidy status (Feulgen spectroscopy), and disease recurrence. PSMA mRNA expression in selected primary tumors and metastatic lesions was also detected using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. RESULTS: Generally, PCa cells expressed relatively increased levels of PSMA as compared with benign elements. Among the PCa cases, increased (high) PSMA expression correlated with tumor grade (P = 0.030), pathological stage (P = 0.029), aneuploidy (P = 0.010), and biochemical recurrence (P = 0.001). The mean serum prostate-specific antigen level of 18.28 ng/ml at the time of diagnosis for the PSMA-overexpressing tumors was significantly greater than the mean serum prostate-specific antigen of 9.10 ng/ml for the non-PMSA-overexpressing group (P = 0.006). On multivariate analysis, pathological stage (P = 0.018) and PSMA expression (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. PSMA protein overexpression in high-grade primary PCa tumors and metastatic lesions also correlated with increased PSMA mRNA expression levels using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that overexpression of PSMA in primary PCa correlates with other adverse traditional prognostic factors and independently predicts disease outcome.     

Preparation and characterization of new anti-PSMA monoclonal antibodies with potential clinical use

Monoclonal antibodies with high specificity for prostate cancer tissue are of interest for diagnostic and therapeutic applications employing targeted therapy. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a protein predominantly found in epithelial cells of prostate tissue origin and its expression correlates with tumor aggressiveness. Here, we report the development and characterization of new antibodies against PSMA. Murine monoclonal antibodies (MAb) were obtained by immunizing mice with a peptide corresponding to PSMA extracellular residues 490-500 -- GKSLYESWTKK (PSMA(490-500)). The MAbs react specifically to PSMA and to the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP with an affinity for PSMA in the low nanomolar range. This study also demonstrates the potential use of these antibodies for targeted drug delivery to prostate cancer cells. Nanomolar concentrations of PSMA-specific MAb in association with a molecule with cytotoxic potential were sufficient to allow for binding and uptake by LNCaP cells within minutes, leading to complete cell death within 3 days. These MAbs have potential clinical value in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic applications for prostate cancer.