Prasugrel: a novel platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor antagonist. A review on its mechanism of action and clinical development

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel, in combination with aspirin, is associated with improvement in long-term clinical outcomes in these patients and is currently the antiplatelet therapy of choice. However, a significant number of patients experience recurrent ischemic events, which have been in part attributed to variability in individual response profiles to currently recommended treatment regimens. The presence of variable degrees of responsiveness, thus inadequate platelet inhibition in some patients, underscores the need for novel agents with more potency and less variable platelet inhibitory effects. Prasugrel (CS-747; LY640315), a novel third-generation oral thienopyridine, is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y₁₂ receptor. Pre-clinical and early phase clinical studies have shown prasugrel to be characterized by more potent antiplatelet effects, lower interindividual variability in platelet response, and faster onset of activity compared with clopidogrel. Recent findings from large-scale Phase III testing showed prasugrel to be more efficacious in preventing ischemic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI; however, this is achieved at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding. This article reviews the currently available data regarding the efficacy and safety of prasugrel.     

Novel Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: What is New in the Pipeline?

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are triggered by enhanced platelet activation and aggregation. Hence, a cornerstone of successful secondary prevention in ACS is an effective platelet inhibition. Additionally, coronary interventions (PCI) lead to even increased artherothrombotic risks, another challenge in preventing recurrent events including stent thrombosis. Promising platelet targets were characterized and novel molecules were developed that are currently under investigation. Intensified antiplatelet therapy includes the risk of major bleeding which itself increases the mortality rate. Previous strategies of antiplatelet therapy were based on an "one-size fits all" concept. However, there has been evidence that variability of drug response exists and represents a clinically relevant issue. This observation is in line with results of randomized clinical trials that standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy is not sufficient to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in certain subgroups of ACS patients. In the last years, novel antiplatelet substances have entered the clinical arena and others are currently under investigation in phase II and III clinical trials. These include 3rd generation thienopyridine (prasugrel, elinogrel), ATP analogs (Ticagrelor, cangrelor), and non-ADP-receptor blocking antiplatelet substances like thrombin receptor antagonists. These agents have shown promising results in pilot studies and recent randomized trials. As the prevention of atherothrombotic risk is at the expense of bleeding risk, it will be a future task to clearly define patients' groups and subsets of ACS for the best net clinical benefit. This article focuses on the role of novel antiplatelet substances to reduce CV risk in ACS, discuss clinical implications and their potential future role.     

Importance of potent P2Y(12) receptor blockade in acute myocardial infarction: focus on prasugrel

INTRODUCTION: Prasugrel therapy is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the efficacy and safety profile of prasugrel, cost considerations, and its role in clinical practice based on published data. The authors searched PubMed and Ovid databases for English language clinical trial articles involving the use of prasugrel in human subjects and patients, published through June 2012. The keyword "prasugrel" was used. The review focuses on clinical trials, but other articles including Food and Drug Administration documents are also reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Prasugrel has a more rapid and greater pharmacodynamic (PD) effect than clopidogrel. No significant drug - drug interactions have been reported. In a large-scale randomized clinical trial, prasugrel was associated with better protection against ischemic event occurrence compared to clopidogrel, but more bleeding in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Adverse outcomes outweighed the benefit of prasugrel in certain subgroups, including patients over the age of 75, those weighing less than 60 kg, and patients with a prior history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. In subsequent PD studies, prasugrel therapy showed suboptimal platelet inhibition in selected patients. In addition, "hyper-responsiveness" to prasugrel may increase the risk of serious bleeding in high-risk patients. More detailed studies are warranted to explore antiplatelet regimens tailored to optimally limit ischemic and bleeding event occurrences. A Phase-III TRILOGY trial (NCT00699998) will indicate the clinical efficacy and safety of prasugrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS, who are medically managed without coronary revascularization.     

Platelet hyperreactivity and stent thrombosis in patients undergoing coronary stenting

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but very serious event complicating percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. Both procedure- and patient-related factors, including inadequate platelet inhibition are well known predictors of ST. According to the present guidelines, a dual antiplatelet treatment regimen consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor such as clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor is routinely administered to ACS patients and to patients undergoing PCI in order to prevent thrombotic vessel occlusions. In recent years, evidence has grown that patients showing high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) under clopidogrel intake exhibit a higher risk for the occurrence of ischemic events including ST. For assessing HPR, different platelet function assays are currently available and have already found their way into routine clinical practice in several centers. Along with this development, more potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors like prasugrel and ticagrelor are substitutes for clopidogrel in specific circumstances such as in ACS patients or in patients who do not adequately respond to standard clopidogrel treatment. Utilizing platelet function monitoring, patients showing HPR can be identified and an optimized antiplatelet treatment regime can be tailored for these patients. This review paper aims to summarize the important facts in relation to ST and antiplatelet therapy with a particular focus on P2Y12 receptor inhibition and its ex vivo assessment in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.     

Role of platelet function testing in clinical practice: current concepts and future perspectives

Oral antiplatelet therapy is routinely administered to ACS patients as well as to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the primary aim of inhibiting platelet-mediated thrombus formation and subsequent abrupt vessel occlusion. Individual platelet response to aspirin and especially to clopidogrel is highly variable and evidence has grown in recent years linking an attenuated response to therapy with the occurrence of ischemic events. At present, the antiplatelet therapy landscape is changing with the emergence of prasugrel and ticagrelor as alternative and more potent treatment options. In addition, tests for near-patient monitoring of platelet function in clinical practice are available and are being increasingly employed for the optimization of antiplatelet treatment. It is hypothesized that platelet function testing may prove useful for achieving an optimized balance of proven platelet inhibition at a cost of moderate bleeding risk. This is also why first centers have already included testing in day-to-day routine. Extensive clinical evaluations with a range of currently-available assays for platelet function testing are ongoing and the current and future role of platelet function testing in clinical practice is a topic of much debate. Widespread adoption of this practice and its incorporation into clinical guidelines awaits the results of ongoing trials where treatment is changed based on platelet function testing data. This review paper summarizes the key characteristics of platelet function tests available, presents an overview of relevant studies and examines the present role of platelet function testing in clinical practice with a focus on antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.     

Genetics of platelet inhibitor treatment

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist is the standard of care in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) because this regimen has markedly decreased the rate of cardiovascular events. The substantial variability in pharmacodynamic response as well as the moderate antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel has raised major concerns, since high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity has consistently been associated with increased risk for ischaemic events in PCI patients. Baseline demographic and clinical variables contributing to the observed variability have been identified. Besides this, research within the past decade has focused on the impact of genetic polymorphisms encoding transport systems or enzymes involved in the absorption and metabolism of these drugs. Loss-of-function polymorphisms in CYP2C19 are the strongest individual variables affecting pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet response to clopidogrel, but explain no more than 5 to 12% of the variability in adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation on clopidogrel. No genetic variables contributing to clinical outcomes of patients treated with the newer P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists, prasugrel or ticagrelor, have been identified so far. This review aims to provide an update on the current status of genotype-based personalized therapy with clopidogrel.     

Review of clopidogrel dose escalation in the current era of potent P2Y12 inhibitors

Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is associated with increased risk of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) compared to ticagrelor and prasugrel. Investigators have therefore sought to “escalate” clopidogrel dosing to overcome HTPR to reduce ischemic/thrombotic events. In this review, we will summarize the evidence for dose escalation in the context of genetic determinants of resistance and platelet function data. We will review contemporary clinical trials that have sought to improve delivery of dual antiplatelet therapy to patients with coronary artery disease and discuss the potential of clopidogrel dose escalation in specific populations.     

Clopidogrel

Dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) and clopidogrel is a guideline-recommended standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite a large body of clinical evidence obtained from randomized clinical trials and patient registries supporting the efficacy and safety of aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy in these patients, questions concerning the optimal use of dual antiplatelet therapy remain. Widely debated topics pertaining to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS or undergoing PCI include (i) the appropriate clopidogrel loading dose; (ii) the optimal time to initiate the clopidogrel loading dose; (iii) the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following ACS or PCI; (iv) impact of variability of platelet response on patient outcomes; and (v) the role of other recommended and emerging P2Y₁₂ antagonists. This review discusses these ongoing controversies regarding the optimal use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with ACS or those undergoing PCI.     

Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel Antiplatelet Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome

Antithrombotic therapy is imperative in the management of patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The combination of antiplatelet therapy in conjunction with antithrombotic therapy has become the standard of care in improving the morbidity and mortality of patients with an ACS and in reducing ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with an ACS are at increased risk for a recurrent event, both in-hospital and for several months afterward. Secondary prevention to reduce these events is accomplished through the establishment of appropriate medical therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and adenosine 5'-diphosphate P2Y(12) receptor blockers such as ticlopidine or clopidogrel are integral components of this regimen; however, both of these thienopyridines have a relatively slow onset of action and variable bioavailability. Prasugrel, a third-generation thienopyridine approved by the US FDA in 2009, has a more rapid onset of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and ticlopidine because of increased efficiency of prodrug-to-active metabolite conversion. The result is higher and less variable concentration of the active metabolite within 60 minutes following oral dosing. Phase II and III trials assessing the safety and efficacy of prasugrel have been completed, including JUMBO-TIMI 26, PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44, and TRITON-TIMI 38. These trials demonstrated greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and lower rates of the composite endpoint of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke compared with clopidogrel. However, major bleeding occurred more frequently with prasugrel treatment than with clopidogrel. This review highlights the current state of evidence-based antiplatelet therapy and provides guidance on appropriate use of prasugrel in cardiovascular medicine.     

Prasugrel: A Guide to Its Use in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the US

Oral prasugrel (Effient®; Efient®) provides rapid, potent inhibition of platelet aggregation. It is indicated (in combination with aspirin) for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the pivotal clinical trial in this patient population, prasugrel-based therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of ischemic events than clopidogrel-based therapy. However, the efficacy of prasugrel was offset by a higher risk of bleeding than clopidogrel, with patients aged ≥75 years, those weighing <60 kg and those with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack at the greatest risk. Prasugrel appears to have an overall favorable risk: benefit ratio in ACS patients undergoing PCI who do not have these three easily identifiable clinical characteristics. Limited pharmacoeconomic analyses suggest that prasugrel-based therapy is an economically attractive treatment strategy relative to clopidogrel-based therapy from a US healthcare payer perspective.     

Thienopyridines and Other ADP-Receptor Antagonists

Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibition plays a pivotal role in preventing thrombotic vascular events in patients with ACS and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, the group of thienopyridines include ticlopidine, clopidogrel and prasugrel, all of which are orally administered prodrugs leading to irreversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition. Non-thienopyridine derivatives including ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel do not require metabolic activation and lead to a reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition in contrast to thienopyridines. The extend of platelet inhibition is subject to the administered antiplatelet agent and influenced by individual genetic and clinical factors. Insufficient platelet inhibition, termed high platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with an increased risk for ischemic events after PCI whereas exceeding platelet inhibition results in an increased bleeding risk. Pharmacologic properties and clinical outcome data differ substantially between the existing P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Whether individualized antiplatelet treatment incorporating different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors improves patients' clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.     

Developments in antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes and considerations for long-term management

ABSTRACT

Objective: This article reviews the currently available antiplatelet therapies and emerging investigational drugs in the treatment of acutecoronary syndrome (ACS), and considerations for primary and secondary prevention in the long-term management of ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Research design and methods: Primary studies and reviews in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966–2008) using the terms ‘acute coronary syndrome’, ‘antiplatelet’, ‘aspirin’, ‘long-term management’, ‘P2Y₁₂ receptor’, and ‘thienopyridine’. Additional references were obtained by searching the reference lists of the identified articles. Articles were included if they were recently published and pertinent, patient-focused, and authors were recognized as leaders in the field. Current review is limited by literature search on single database.

Results: Platelets play a major role in atherogenesis and the formation of thrombi, the main events in the pathogenesis of ACS. Although aspirin is an effective antiplatelet agent, efficacy and safety data from a number of randomized clinical trials on atherothrombotic disease support the use of dual antiplatelet therapies such as aspirin and thienopyridines over single antiplatelet therapy for ACS and up to 1?year following ACS. Antiplatelet agents reduce, but do not eliminate, ischemic events after ACS due, in part, to variable individual response (or resistance) in antiplatelet agents, non-compliance, progression of atherosclerosis, modest inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) levels and other factors. Several antiplatelet agents, including novel P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonists and thrombin-receptor antagonists, are currently under investigation for ACS and primary and secondary prevention in the long-term management of patients undergoing PCI.

Conclusions: Current antiplatelet therapies have clinical benefits such as reducing immediate and long-term cardiovascular risk, but substantial residual risk remains indicating a need for new therapeutic agents. Additional large randomized trials are necessary to determine the most appropriate treatment regimens for ACS patients.     

急性冠脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前后抗血小板策略

急性冠脉综合征(ACS)是一组由急性心肌缺血引起的临床综合征,包括不稳定型心绞痛(UA)、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI).ACS主要发病机制是动脉粥样硬化斑块破裂后,血小板激活和凝血酶的形成,最终导致血栓形成.目前抗血小板治疗和抗凝治疗是ACS患者抗栓治疗的两大重要组成部分.随着经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的广泛应用,ACS患者PCI围手术期抗栓药物的安全性及有效性备受关注.本文就ACS患者有关接受PCI前后的抗血小板治疗策略的一些大型临床试验及抗血小板药物在当今早期侵入性冠状动脉治疗时代中的应用现状作一综述.     

优化冠心病抗血小板治疗的策略

阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷是目前治疗急性冠状动脉综合征和接受了经皮冠状动脉介入术后抗血小板方案中最佳的组合。然而,出血和部分病人出现不敏感或对抗,促使寻找更理想的抗血小板药物或更优化的治疗方案。高剂量氯吡格雷给药策略虽然轻度增加大出血风险,但有助于更强地抑制血小板功能、改善临床结果。更新、更有效的抗血小板药物,如普拉格雷和替卡格雷,在急性冠状动脉综合征和接受了经皮冠状动脉介入术病人中有更好的短期和长期收益。本文就有关研究进展作简要的综述。     

Ticagrelor for acute coronary syndrome?

Current guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin plus either clopidogrel or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, such dual therapy increases the likelihood of bleeding compared to that with aspirin alone. Ticagrelor (Brilique - Astra-Zeneca) is a new oral antiplatelet drug recently licensed in the UK (since publication of the NICE guidelines) for use with aspirin in patients with ACS, including those managed medically or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here we review the place of ticagrelor in the management of people with ACS, and whether it offers advantages over standard therapy in terms of greater efficacy or lower likelihood of bleeding complications.     

Developing drugs for use before,during and soon after percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a milestone for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Antithrombotic therapy is essential to prevent ischemic complications, including the microvascular no-reflow, while minimizing bleeding events.

Areas covered: This overview discusses available and developing drugs for PCI including anticoagulants, antiplatelets and treatment of no-reflow.

Expert opinion: For years unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the unique anticoagulant to be used before and during PCI. Enoxaparin showed similar efficacy and safety, yet, based on recent trials, bivalirudin has been shown to have some benefits, particularly for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The evidence concerning new anticoagulants is still preliminary, except for new oral anticoagulants, particularly rivaroxaban that showed intriguing findings and is currently under investigation. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard of care after PCI, but new developments have recently emerged. Indeed, ticagrelor and prasugrel are currently recommended over clopidogrel due to their significant reduction of ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) whereas clopidogrel remains the choice in stable CAD. Among new agents, vorapaxar and cangrelor showed positive but limited evidence and might be considered at least in selected patients. Conversely, evidence on effective treatments for no-reflow remains limited and would require future dedicated research.     

Prasugrel during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence from clinical data

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) encompassing stent implantation is a mainstay in the management of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite refinements in techniques and devices, peri- and post-procedural antithrombotic therapy remains pivotal to prevent early and late thrombotic events, without unduly increasing bleeding risk. Concomitant dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has been considered until recently the standard of care in terms of oral antiplatelet agents. However, most recently a novel and more potent thienopyridine, prasugrel, has been tested in randomized trials including patients with STEMI, and subsequently approved for clinical practice in Europe and North America. Despite its potent antithrombotic effect, prasugrel also carries a statistically significant increase in the risk of bleeding, especially in the elderly, those with low body weight, and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Thus, the use of prasugrel, as well as that of clopidogrel or ticagrelor, should best be individualized to maximize clinical benefits and minimize hazards.     

Triple antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

Heightened platelet activity plays a critical role in thrombus formation, which is central to acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS (comprising unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and has been implicated in poor clinical outcome. Platelets not only impact coronary thrombus but are major contributors to microcirculatory dysfunction and vascular inflammation. Efforts to inhibit platelet function, including antiplatelet therapy, are paramount to the management of ACS; thus, a growing recognition of the various pathways driving platelet activity has given rise to the need for multiple agents that impart complimentary mechanisms of action. While only inhibiting platelet activation will still allow for aggregation, i.e. the binding of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptors to fibrinogen, solely blocking aggregation may leave platelet-activating pathways free to sustain the production and release of various pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic compounds. The benefit of 'triple antiplatelet therapy', referring to the combination of aspirin, a thienopyridine or non-thienopyridine adenosine diphosphate (ADP)/P2Y12 receptor blocker and a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), has been demonstrated in patients with NSTE-ACS who ultimately undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are determined to be at an elevated risk for ischaemic events, and in patients undergoing primary PCI. It is therefore recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Furthermore, the rationale for adding a GPI, particularly in patients with STEMI, is backed by studies that have shown negligible effects of a 600?mg clopidogrel loading dose, despite being administered 4 hours prior to PCI. Moreover, it has been observed that the physiological state of STEMI may deem dual antiplatelet therapy ineffective, because during an acute event the absorption of clopidogrel may be impaired. Nonetheless, there is still considerable variability with respect to the use of triple antiplatelet therapy such as that documented in the Euro Heart Survey. The perception that the mortality benefit afforded by adding a GPI to dual oral antiplatelet therapy does not outweigh the risk is a likely factor. This may be fuelled by results of trials such as BRAVE-3, which, inconsistent with those for On-TIME 2, failed to prove the value of adding a GPI to dual oral antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI. Subsequent analyses have indeed demonstrated the positive benefit-risk ratio associated with adding a GPI and determined that the timing of GPI administration could have an impact on clinical outcome related to its impact on infarct size in patients with STEMI. Additionally, it has been presumed that a synergistic effect exists between P2Y12 inhibitors and GPIs. Triple antiplatelet therapy has a significant role to play in the management of patients with ACS managed with PCI. An understanding of patient risk status and timing of symptoms and bleeding risk is crucial to patient selection and ensuring that this therapy is optimized. Though no interaction has been noted in trials of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents, future studies are key to determining the role of this strategy in the era of these more potent agents.     

Prasugrel

Clinical trials have demonstrated the superior clinical efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy with a thienopyridine (a P2Y(12) receptor blocker) and aspirin (COX-1 inhibitor) in patients undergoing stenting as well as patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, clopidogrel treatment is associated with a wide response variability and non-responsiveness in selected patients. The latter phenomenon is linked to the occurrence of recurrent ischaemic events including stent thrombosis in the recent studies. Prasugrel is a new thienopyridine derivative that produces more potent platelet inhibition and a rapid onset of action that is associated with irreversible P2Y(12) receptor blockade. The latter properties of prasugrel may provide a superior alternative to clopidogrel, with less response variability and a decreased prevalence of non-responsiveness.     

Aspirin and Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Antagonists in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Platelet activation and aggregation are key components in the cascade of events causing thrombosis following plaque rupture. Antiplatelet therapy is essential in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is a well established antiplatelet therapy and is mandated for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events following ACS. In patients with ACS, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone. For patients undergoing PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is warranted. Aspirin should be continued indefinitely after PCI. Pretreatment of patients with clopidogrel prior to PCI lowers the incidence of cardiovascular events, yet the optimum timing of drug administration and dose are still being investigated, as is the duration of therapy following PCI. Late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents has pushed the recommendation for duration of clopidogrel therapy up to 1 year and perhaps beyond, in patients without risks for bleeding. The concepts of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are important clinical questions. No uniform definition exists for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance. Measurements of resistance are often highly variable and do not necessarily correlate with clinical resistance. Noncompliance remains the most prominent mode of resistance. Screening of selected patient populations for resistance or pharmacologic intervention of those patients termed 'resistant' warrants further study.