Total replacement for post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow

Fifty-three of 55 consecutive elbow replacements for post-traumatic arthritis were followed for a minimum of two years (mean 6.3, range 2 to 14.4). The patients presented difficult management problems, having undergone an average of two previous operations per joint; 22 joints had suffered prior complications; 18 had less than 50 degrees of flexion and six were flail. One of three versions of the Coonrad prosthesis was employed in all. During the follow-up period, 10 patients underwent 14 revision procedures for aseptic loosening; 38 elbows are currently without progressive radiolucent lines. In two patients an elbow had to be resected, one for deep infection and the other for bone resorption following a foreign-body reaction to titanium. The current design of the Coonrad prosthesis offers a reliable option for the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis but should be used only in carefully selected patients over the age of 60 years.     

Souter arthroplasty for elbows with severe destruction

One hundred fifty-eight primary Souter elbow arthroplasties were done on 134 patients (121 women) with severe joint destruction (Larsen Grade 5) or large bone defects or both. Joint replacement operations were done at our institution from 1985-1997. The study group comprised 156 joints in 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or other variants of chronic inflammatory joint disease, one in a patient with osteoarthritis, and one patient with posttraumatic arthrosis. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 57 years (range, 26-81 years) and the mean disease duration was 27 years (tinge, 2-70 years). Radiographically, severe bone defects were detected in 100 humeri and 134 ulnas. Retentive (snap-fit) ulnar components were implanted in 110 joints, and bone grafts were used on 26 humeri and 14 ulnas. Major complications led to five early and 16 late reoperations in 19 patients. Four reoperations were done because of dislocation and eight because of aseptic loosening. One reoperation was done because of early infection and five were done because of late infection. One patient had reoperation because of superficial infection in the bursa olecrani and one triceps tendon rupture also was repaired. One patient had wound repair because of marginal necrosis. In the survival analysis, the cumulative success rate without revision for aseptic loosening at 5 years followup was 97%. Despite the demanding nature of these arthroplasties, the primary results are encouraging. Technically, it is possible to do elbow replacement, even on elbows where the humeral condyles or olecranon or both are missing, if there is sufficient bone left on the diaphyseal areas for primary stem fixation. However, in these extreme cases, the poor general condition of the patient or the difficult soft tissue problems in the elbow region may prove to be a contraindication for joint replacement.     

Revisions for aseptic loosening in Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty

We present the prosthesis survival of the 7 most commonly used component types of 522 primary Souter elbow replacements performed in the Rheumatism Foundation Hospital during the years 1982-1997. The cohort comprised 370 female and 33 male patients with a mean age of 57 (20-81) years. 119 patients had a bilateral procedure. The indications for operation in all cases were rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory joint disease. The mean duration of the disease at the time of operation was 25 (2-70) years. Elbows were often severely destroyed and, in one third of the joints, essential bone structures were missing. Therefore, in 178 cases, the ulnar components were retentive and in the remaining 344 elbows with better bone stock non-retentive. 47 patients had 51 operations for aseptic loosening up to the end of year 2000. In the survival analysis, the general cumulative success rates for the whole study cohort, without revision because of aseptic loosening 5 and 10 years after surgery, were 96% and 84%, respectively. Revision was used as an end point. Cumulative success rates of the 7 most commonly used components are presented separately. The highest 5-year-survival rate was 100%, the lowest 93%. The corresponding 10-year-survival rates were 91% and 76%, respectively.     

Total elbow replacement with the GSB III prosthesis

Fourteen consecutive elbows have been treated for rheumatoid arthritis (9 elbows) and for post-traumatic osteoarthrosis (5 elbows) by total elbow replacement with the GSB III implant. The elbows were reviewed retrospectively after a mean follow-up of 6 years (2 to 9 years). Ten of 14 elbows had a functioning GSB III implant at follow-up; 7 of them were rated satisfactory and 3 unsatisfactory with the Mayo elbow performance score. In 5 of these 10 cases, the patients had significant pain relief with no or only mild pain at follow-up, whereas 5 had moderate to severe pain. With a functioning implant the range of motion averaged 140 degrees of flexion, 19 degrees of lack of extension, 65 degrees of pronation, and 84 degrees of supination. Six (43%) elbows had major complications requiring 1 to 8 additional operations. Aseptic loosening requiring revision occurred in 4 (29%) elbows. Two of them were treated by a resection arthroplasty, and 2 were revised with another hinged semiconstrained device. Three further elbows had radiolucent lines involving more than 50% of the cement-bone interface of either the humeral or the ulnar component. However, in 8 elbows the cementing technique was considered marginal or inadequate. Poor cementing (marginal or inadequate) was associated with loosening (P = .008). The GSB III total elbow prosthesis can restore function and reduce pain. The rate of aseptic loosening in this series was higher than previously reported. Based on this observation, we conclude that the GSB III implant seems to be sensitive to the insertion technique and does not tolerate suboptimal cementing.     

Revisions for aseptic loosening in Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty: incidence of revisions of different components used in 522 consecutive cases

We present the prosthesis survival of the 7 most commonly used component types of 522 primary Souter elbow replacements performed in the Rheumatism Foundation Hospital during the years 1982-1997. The cohort comprised 370 female and 33 male patients with a mean age of 57 (20-81) years. 119 patients had a bilateral procedure. The indications for operation in all cases were rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory joint disease. The mean duration of the disease at the time of operation was 25 (2-70) years. Elbows were often severely destroyed and, in one thiird of the joints, essential bone structures were missing. Therefore, in 178 cases, the ulnar components were retentive and in the remaining 344 elbows with better bone stock non-retentive. 47 patients had 51 operations for aseptic loosening up to the end of year 2000. In the survival analysis, the general cumulative success rates for the whole study cohort, without revision because of aseptic loosening 5 and10 years after surgery, were 96% and 84%, respectively. Revision was used as an end point. Cumulative success rates of the 7 most commonly used components are presented separately. The highest 5-year-survival rate was 100%, the lowest 93%. The corresponding 10-year-survival rates were 91% and 76%, respectively.     

Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement in late-stage rheumatoid arthritis

Between 1994 and 2000, 51 capitellocondylar elbow replacements were inserted in 41 patients. All patients had late-stage rheumatoid arthritis. The mean age at operation was 56 years (range, 25-78 years). There were 12 men and 29 women. At follow-up, 6 patients had died of unrelated causes with the implant in situ and without radiographic loosening, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. The remaining 43 elbows in 34 patients were followed up clinically and radiographically at a mean of 6.9 years (range, 26-119 months). Relief of pain was complete in 91% of the surviving elbows, and in 9%, there was only mild pain. Pain-free range of motion at follow-up was significantly improved. Flexion increased a mean of 43 degrees ; extension, 16 degrees ; supination, 24 degrees and pronation, 26 degrees . Of the elbows, 7 underwent revision, 3 because of deep infection, 1 for aseptic loosening, and 3 because of instability. Other complications included 2 maltracking elbows, 2 triceps tendon ruptures, 2 cases of operative olecranon bursitis, and 2 ulnar nerve palsies. One elbow showed radiolucent lines of more than 1 mm in the circumference of the ulnar component; none of the other elbows showed any signs of progressive radiographic loosening. At a mean follow-up of 6.9 years, a functional prosthesis was retained in 82.7% of the elbows, and the mean survival of the implant was 8.6 years (95% CI, 7.8-9.5 years).     

Souter-Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty

We have reviewed 66 consecutive Souter-Strathclyde arthroplasties of the elbow implanted in 59 patients between 1982 and 1993. Thirteen patients (15 elbows) (19.6%) died. Sixteen elbows (24.2%) were revised, six for aseptic loosening (9%), four (6%) because of fracture or loosening after a fracture, three (4.5%) for infection and three (4.5%) for dislocation. Four patients refused to attend for review. In 33 elbows with a follow-up of 93 months (60 to 167) complete relief of pain was achieved in 22 (67%) when seen at one year. After ten years or more 36% of the elbows were painfree and 64% had occasional slight pain especially under loading or stress. The mean gain in the arc of movement was 16 degrees, but a mean flexion contracture of 33 degrees remained. The main early complications were intraoperative fractures of the epicondyles (9%), postoperative dislocation (4.5%) and ulnar neuropathy. The incidence of ulnar neuropathy before operation was 19%. After operation 20 patients (33%) had an ulnar neuropathy, in seven of which it had been present before operation, and of these weakness of the hypothenar muscle occurred in two. The probability of survival of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow prosthesis based on the Kaplan-Meier calculation is 69% at ten years.     

Total elbow replacement with the Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term follow-up

We assessed the long-term results of 58 Souter-Strathclyde total elbow replacements in 49 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The mean length of follow-up was 9.5 years (0.7 to 16.7). The mean pre-operative Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 30 (15 to 80) and at final follow-up was 82 (60 to 95). A total of 13 elbows (22.4%) were revised, ten (17.2%) for aseptic loosening, one (1.7%) for instability, one (1.7%) for secondary loosening after fracture, and one elbow (1.7%) was removed because of deep infection. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 70% and 53% at ten and 16 years, respectively. Failure of the ulnar component was found to be the main problem in relation to the loosening. Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve had no influence on ulnar nerve paresthaesiae in these patients.     

The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery

Between 1980 and 2000, 63 support rings were used in the management of acetabular deficiency in a series of 60 patients, with a mean follow-up of 8.75 years (2 months to 23.8 years). There was a minimum five-year follow-up for successful reconstructions. The indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening in 30 cases and infection in 33. All cases were Paprosky III defects; IIIA in 33 patients (52.4%) and IIIB in 30 (47.6%), including four with pelvic dissociation. A total of 26 patients (43.3%) have died since surgery, and 34 (56.7%) remain under clinical review. With acetabular revision for infection or aseptic loosening as the definition of failure, we report success in 53 (84%) of the reconstructions. A total of 12 failures (19%) required further surgery, four (6.3%) for aseptic loosening of the acetabular construct, six (9.5%) for recurrent infection and two (3.2%) for recurrent dislocation requiring captive components. Complications, seen in 11 patients (18.3%), included six femoral or sciatic neuropraxias which all resolved, one grade III heterotopic ossification, one on-table acetabular revision for instability, and three early post-operative dislocations managed by manipulation under anaesthesia, with no further instability. We recommend support rings and morcellised bone graft for significant acetabular bone deficiency that cannot be reconstructed using mesh.     

The GSB III elbow prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis: a 2- to 9-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The optimal design of an elbow prosthesis for badly damaged elbows is unkown. We evaluated 23 GSB III semi-constrained (sloppy-hinged) total elbow arthroplasties in 16 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After a mean follow-up period of 5 (2-9) years, we assessed quality of the cementing technique, signs of aseptic loosening, patient satisfaction, range of movement, and determined the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) elbow score. 3 patients had died before follow-up; thus, 20 replacements in 16 patients were available for clinical and radiographic study. All patients had endstage rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the elbow joint. RESULTS: In 2 patients, humeral components were revised due to malorientation. 1 arthroplasty was revised due to aseptic loosening of the humeral component. There were 4 cases of intraoperative fracture which healed uneventfully. The total rate of complications was thus one-third. In 17 of 40 components, the cementing technique was rated as marginal or inadequate. We found no association between cementing technique and loosening. The arc of extension/flexion increased by 19 degrees (0-80), and the range of pronation/supination increased by 31 degrees (0-130). There were no cases of infection or ulnar nerve dysfunction. At the latest follow-up, the HSS elbow score was 84 (40-100) points. 11 of 20 elbows were rated as excellent, 4 elbows were rated as good, 2 elbows were rated as fair, and 3 elbows were rated as poor. 14 of 16 patients were satisfied with the result and the 2 patients who were not satisfied had persistent pain. INTERPRETATION: Despite the inherent problems of cementing in small-calibre medullary cavities, the clinical outcome of the GSB III arthroplasty was encouraging for patients with-end stage RA. The rate of overall complications compared favorably with other studies of semiconstrained elbow arthroplasty for end-stage RA. Most complications of the series were minor and did not necessitate revision.     

The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study

We report the results of 79 patients (81 hips) who underwent impaction grafting at revision hip replacement using the Exeter femoral stem. Their mean age was 64 years (31 to 83). According to the Endoklinik classification, 20 hips had a type 2 bone defect, 40 had type 3, and 21 had type 4. The mean follow-up for unrevised stems was 10.4 years (5 to 17). There were 12 re-operations due to intra- and post-operative fractures, infection (one hip) and aseptic loosening (one hip). All re-operations affected type 3 (6 hips) and 4 (6 hips) bone defects. The survival rate for re-operation for any cause was 100% for type 2, 81.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1 to 95.3) for type 3, and 70.8% (95% CI 51.1 to 90.5) for type 4 defects at 14 years. The survival rate with further revision for aseptic loosening as the end point was 98.6% (95% CI 95.8 to 100). The final clinical score was higher for patients with type 2 bone defects than type 4 regarding pain, function and range of movement. Limp was most frequent in the type 4 group (p < 0.001). The mean subsidence of the stem was 2.3 mm (SD 3.7) for hips with a type 2 defect, 4.3 mm (SD 7.2) for type 3 and 9.6 mm (SD 10.8) for type 4 (p = 0.022). The impacted bone grafting technique has good clinical results in femoral revision. However, major bone defects affect clinical outcome and also result in more operative complications.     

Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts

Background:Hip arthroplasty is one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures with high scores of success while its most common complication is aseptic loosening of the acetabular component, which may result from host bone loss or even from pelvis discontinuity. The purpose of the study was to evaluate results in patients after revision acetabular arthroplasty with reconstruction rings and allografts.Results:The mean followup period of the patients was 7.2 years (range 3-19 years). A Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that a 3- and 10 year survival rate was 92.8% and 84.8% respectively, using further revision for any reason of the acetabular device as an end point. Eight patients revealed implant related complications. Four patients presented with ring loosening, one with a loose acetabular polyethylene cup, two hips demonstrated recurrent dislocations and one patient was with deep infection. Regarding the remaining 61 patients without re-revision surgery, the mean Harris hip score improved from 30.5 to 73.8 points.Conclusion:A modified, antiprotrusion cage provides an acceptable survival rate and radiological results, but complications could still be expected. It seems that the observed massive bone loss with pelvic discontinuity and an insufficient fixation of the cage to the ischium may result in implant loosening. Stable fixation of the ischial ring flange with screws is an essential condition to expect a good outcome.     

Five- to thirteen-year follow-up of the GSB III total elbow arthroplasty

Between 1988 and 1995, the senior author performed total elbow arthroplasty in 28 elbows (23 patients) with the GSB III prosthesis. At the most recent follow-up, 7 patients had died (9 elbows) and 1 had the implant removed because of a deep infection. The remaining 18 elbows (15 patients) were available for clinical and radiographic review at a mean period of 7.6 years (range, 5.5-11.9 years). All 15 patients were satisfied with the results of their elbow replacement, with a mean Mayo elbow performance score of 91 (range, 75-100). The mean flexion/extension and supination/pronation arcs improved by 33 degrees and 67 degrees, respectively. Radiographic follow-up demonstrated progressive loosening in only 1 patient and no progressive loosening in those with an adequate cement technique. Mild or moderate lysis of the distal humeral or proximal ulnar components was noted in 10 elbows, and severe lysis of the distal humerus was seen in 1. Of the patients, 6 (21%) had mild complications: triceps avulsions in 3, superficial wound infections in 2, and an undisplaced fracture of the distal humeral medial condyle in 1. In 4 patients (14%) complications developed requiring reoperation, including exchange of the polyethylene bushing because of wear, debridement of synovitis, resection arthroplasty for deep infection, and exploration of an ulnar nerve palsy. In 2 additional patients (7%), persistent ulnar nerve paresthesias developed postoperatively. Of the 28 elbow replacements performed with the GSB III prosthesis, only 1 required revision because of loosening at a mean follow-up of 7.6 years. The results of this series of GSB III elbow replacements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrate reasonable survivorship of this prosthesis.     

Revision of failed total elbow arthroplasty with use of a linked implant

We studied retrospectively the results of revision arthroplasty of the elbow using a linked Coonrad-Morrey implant in 23 patients (24 elbows) after a mean follow-up period of 55 months. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, 19 elbows were satisfactory, nine were excellent and ten good. The median total score had improved from 35 points (20 to 75) before the primary arthroplasty to 85 points (40 to 100) at the latest follow-up. There was a marked relief of pain, but the range of movement showed no overall improvement. Two patients had a second revision because of infection and two for aseptic loosening. The estimated five-year survival rate of the prosthesis was 83.1% (95% confidence interval 61.1 to 93.3). Revision elbow arthroplasty using the Coonrad-Morrey implant provided satisfactory results but with complications occurring in 13 cases.     

Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement. A long-term follow-up study.

Fifty-one capitellocondylar elbow replacements were inserted in forty-one patients between 1976 and 1986. Thirty-nine patients had rheumatoid arthritis and two had traumatic osteoarthrosis. The average age of the patients at the time of the operation was fifty-six years (range, twenty-one to seventy-seven years). Thirty-one patients who had thirty-nine retained elbow prostheses had an average length of follow-up of 6.5 years (range, two to thirteen years). Flexion improved an average of 20 degrees; extension, 4 degrees; pronation, 22 degrees; and supination, 36 degrees. Relief of pain was complete in 85 per cent of the thirty-nine elbows, and in 15 per cent there was only mild pain. Noteworthy postoperative complications in the original fifty-one elbows included infection in four elbows (8 per cent), dislocation in three (6 per cent), and ulnar neuropathy in sixteen (31 per cent). Three elbows were revised: one for a humeral fracture, one for recurrent dislocation, and one for aseptic loosening. Aseptic loosening was evident on radiographs of two elbows; one patient was completely asymptomatic, and one had mild pain with deformity. The Souter zonal radiographic assessment system for identification of radiolucencies at the bone-cement interface was utilized; there was no significant difference in radiolucencies between ulnar components backed with metal and those that were not backed with metal. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship analysis demonstrated that a functional prosthesis was retained in 88 per cent of the elbows at 1.4 years postoperatively and in 83 per cent at 5.5 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

全踝关节置换并发症的meta分析

目的 通过对已发表文献进行汇总分析,总结踝关节置换术并发症的发生率和假体失败率,并总结导致假体失败的高危并发症.方法 通过系统检索1995年1月至2010年12月以英文发表的关于踝关节置换中长期疗效和并发症相关报道的文献.根据纳入标准或排除标准,收集相关结果和数据,通过循证医学meta分析方法,加权汇总分析踝关节置换的手术并发症发生率和假体失败率,总结导致假体失败的高危并发症,并分别汇总各种假体的失败率.结果 有35篇文献纳入研究,共包括4395例假体.发生率最高的三项并发症分别为无菌性松动(12.51%)、术中骨折(11.97%)和骨性撞击(11.27%);导致失败率最高的三项并发症分别为无菌性松动(45.00%)、感染(33.00%)和力线异常(29.00%).meta加权失败率为10.98%(95% CI:8.80%～13.16%),其中STAR假体的失败率为14.20%(95%CI:10.64%～17.76%).结论 无菌性松动、感染和力线异常为踝关节置换术后假体失败的高危并发症,应通过完善的手术操作和合理的术后配合尽量避免其发生.

Abstract：

Objectives To provide a cumulative data about the complications of second or third generation ankle prostheses in the literature, and to provide a summary high-grade complications associated with implant failure.Methods A comprehensive search for all relevant articles published in English from January 1995 to December 2010 was conducted.Two reviewers evaluated each study to determine whether it was eligible for inclusion and collected the data of interest Meta-analytic pooling of results across studies was performed for the complications and failure rate. Results Thirty-five primary studies with 4395implants were identified.The three highest complications of total ankle arthroplasty were aseptic loosening ( 12.51% ), intra-operative bone fracture ( 11.97% ) and bony impingement ( 11.27% ).The three high-grade complications associated with implant failure were aseptic loosening (45.00%), infection (33.00%)and malalignment (29.00%).The pooled mean failure rate was 10.98% (95% CI:8.80% -13.16% ), and the pooled mean failure rate of STAR implant was 14.20% (95% CI:10.64% -17.76% ).Conclusions It is found that aseptic loosening, infection and malalignment are high-grade complications associated with implant failure in total ankle arthroplasty.The orthopaedic surgeons should be more careful in the operation,and the patients should coordinate with the post-operative rehabilitation plan.     

Outcome of total elbow replacement for distal humeral fractures in the elderly: a comparison of primary surgery and surgery after failed internal fixation or conservative treatment

We analysed the outcome of the Coonrad-Morrey total elbow replacement used for fracture of the distal humerus in elderly patients with no evidence of inflammatory arthritis and compared the results for early versus delayed treatment. We studied a total of 32 patients with 15 in the early treatment group and 17 in the delayed treatment group. The mean follow-up was 56.1 months (18 to 88). The percentage of excellent to good results based on the Mayo elbow performance score was not significantly different, 84% in the early group and 79% in the delayed group. Subjective satisfaction was 92% in both the groups. One patient in the early group developed chronic regional pain syndrome and another type 4 aseptic loosening. Two elbows in the early group also showed type 1 radiological loosening. Two patients in the delayed group had an infection, two an ulnar nerve palsy, one developed heterotopic ossification and one type 4 aseptic loosening. Two elbows in this group also showed type 1 radiological loosening. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis for the early and delayed treatment groups was 93% at 88 months and 76% at 84 months, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups.     

Total elbow arthroplasty in patients who have elbow fractures caused by gunshot injuries: 8- to 12-year follow-up study

Introduction In this retrospective study, we aimed to present 8–12-year clinical and radiographic evaluation of total elbow arthroplasty in young patients who had open fractures due to gunshot injuries. Materials and methods The study included a consecutive series of seven patients who had insertion of total elbow prosthesis (semi-constrained type) for the treatment of comminuted intra-articular elbow fractures resulting from gunshot injuries between 1994 and 1998. All patients were male and the mean age at the time of operation was 23 years. Results The average time from the original fracture to the joint replacement was 26 months (range 14–39). The mean follow-up period was 117 ± 15 months. At the time of the latest follow-up, 5 of 7 elbows had a poor result. Radiological evaluations revealed that three patients had ulnar and two patients had humeral component loosening at the last follow-up examination. No intra-operative complications were observed. In the long-term evaluation, two patients had prosthesis loosening that resulted from deep infection and three patients had aseptic loosening that necessitated re-operation. The prosthesis removal was performed. Conclusion As a result, the patients in whom we implemented total elbow prosthesis in comminuted elbow fractures due to gunshot wounds seemed to get back into active life in the early period without any problem and it seemed that their pain disappeared and their functional capacity increased. In the long period, however, these values showed a distinct decrease with the same patients.     

Arthrodesis of the shoulder after septic arthritis. Long-term results

We analysed the long-term results of arthrodesis of the shoulder after infection in 15 patients. At the time of operation, 14 cultures were positive for Staphylococcus aureus. The mean follow-up was 8.3 years (3 to 14) and 90% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome. There were complications in five patients (33%); in three there was nonunion with loosening of the implant. One patient had a sound bony union but with a persistent sinus six years after arthrodesis and another had a sinus which healed after the metal was removed. Four of these five patients (80%) were heavy smokers (> 20 cigarettes/day). Cancellous bone grafting did not affect the incidence of complications. The mean age of the patients with complications was 58.6 v 48.6 years for those without (p = 0.2808; not significant). Those with complications had had more previous operations (6.4 v 2.5, p < 0.05). Antibiotics, as determined by the bacteriological cultures, were administered for six weeks. The complication rate was higher in patients with active sepsis but the younger the patient and the fewer number of previous operations (< 50 years, < four previous operations), the better was the outcome. Considering the rate of complications, we recommend early surgery in these patients.