Seasonal influenza vaccination trends from 2007–2011 in privately insured children and adults in the United States

Background

To ensure adequate protection from seasonal influenza in the US, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends vaccination of all persons aged 6 months or older, with rare exceptions. It also advises starting vaccination as soon as available and continuing throughout the influenza season. This study examined US seasonal vaccination trends during five consecutive influenza seasons in privately-insured children and adults.

Methods

This retrospective, observational cohort study examined trends in influenza vaccination during the 2007–2008 through 2011–2012 influenza seasons using administrative claims data from a large national insurer.

Results

The size of analysis population ranged from 1144,098 to 1245,487 (children, ≥6 months-17 years of age) and from 3931,622 to 4158,223 (adults, 18–64 years of age). Vaccination frequency increased through 2010–2011, was most frequent in young children, and decreased with age. Vaccination rates were highest in the Northeast and lowest in the West and were higher in individuals with frequent outpatient office visits than in those with no or rare visits, with larger differences seen in children. Between 2007 and 2011, the use of preservative-free inactivated vaccine increased, the use of multidose vaccines containing preservatives decreased, and the use of live attenuated influenza vaccines increased among children 2–17 years of age. From 2007–2008 through 2009–2010, the timing of vaccination each year began earlier than the previous one; it remained stable from 2009–2010 through 2011–2012.

Conclusion

Annual influenza vaccination claims for privately-insured children and adults increased and shifted earlier from 2007 through 2009–2011. During the 2011–2012 influenza season, 25.4% of children aged 6 months-17 years and 12.3% of adults aged 18–64 years were vaccinated. Increasing influenza vaccination should remain a priority, and alternative venues for seasonal influenza vaccination should be considered in order to meet the Healthy People 2020 goal of 80% to 90% coverage among children.     

Universal paid leave increases influenza vaccinations among employees in the U.S.

Objectives

We predict the impact of paid leave in increasing influenza vaccinations for employees, thus decreasing workdays lost and healthcare visits resulting from infection.

Methods

Nationally representative data from the 2006–2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were used. We examined working adults aged 18 and above (N = 51,471). Logistic regression measured the association of paid leave with flu vaccination. We predicted the impact on labor and healthcare markets if universal paid leave were provided.

Results

The proportion of workers receiving vaccination annually was higher for those with paid leave versus without paid leave (34.0% vs. 21.0%, P < 0.001). Adjusted odds of having a vaccination increased with paid leave vs. without paid leave (OR = 1.42, CI: 1.31–1.53). Universal paid leave is predicted to increase vaccinations by 1.6 million, resulting in 63.8 thousand fewer absences from work and 18.2 thousand fewer healthcare visits for the flu annually.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that employees without paid leave are significantly less likely to have had a flu vaccination. Expanding paid leave could substantially increase flu vaccination, resulting in fewer workdays lost to influenza and savings in healthcare costs.     

A prospective observational safety study on MF59 adjuvanted cell culture-derived vaccine,Celtura during the A/H1N1 (2009) influenza pandemic

Background

The present study was a prospective observational study to evaluate the safety profile of Celtura^®, a monovalent, cell culture-derived, inactivated subunit influenza vaccine prepared from A/California/07/2009(H1N1) with the adjuvant MF59^®. Subjects were enrolled prospectively during the H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic at medical centres in Colombia, Chile, Switzerland, and Germany during the period December 2009 to June 2010.

Methods

Subjects ages 18 and older were followed for the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) for six months after vaccination. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were neuritis, convulsion (seizure), anaphylaxis, encephalitis, vasculitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, demyelinating conditions, Bell's palsy, and laboratory-confirmed vaccination failure.

Results

Overall, 7348 AEs were reported in 2296 of 3989 enrolled subjects (57.6%). Only two AEs were considered related to injection site reactions. No laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza were reported. There were 108 medically confirmed serious adverse events (SAEs) reported among 73 subjects with 6 such SAEs described as possibly or probably related to vaccination. Three fatal cases were reported and assessed as not related to vaccination. Two AESIs classified as convulsion were reported and assessed as not related to vaccination. Both AESIs occurred well outside the pre-specified 7 day risk window representing the likely timeframe of the occurrence of seizure following vaccination.

Conclusions

The results of this study support the overall good safety profile of MF59 adjuvanted cell culture-derived influenza vaccine as administered in adults during the 2009–2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic. No concern is raised regarding the occurrence of AESIs.     

Hepatitis A vaccination coverage among adults aged 18–49 years in the United States

Background

Hepatitis A is the most common type of hepatitis reported in the United States. Prior to hepatitis A vaccine introduction in 1996, hepatitis A incidence followed a cyclic pattern with peak incidence occurring every 10–15 years. During 1980–1995, between 22,000 and 36,000 hepatitis A cases were reported annually. Since 1996, hepatitis A vaccination recommendations have included adults at risk for infection and children living in communities with the highest disease rates. This study provides the first national estimates of self-reported hepatitis A vaccination coverage among persons aged 18–49 years in the United States.

Methods

We analyzed the 2007 National Immunization Survey-Adult (NIS-Adult) data with restrictions to individuals aged 18–49 years. National estimates of hepatitis A vaccination coverage were calculated based on self-report and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with hepatitis A vaccination status.

Results

Among adults aged 18–49 years, 12.1% (95% confidence interval, CI = 9.9–14.8%) had received two or more doses of hepatitis A vaccine in 2007. Hepatitis A vaccination coverage was significantly higher among adults aged 18–29 years (15.6%) and adults aged 30–39 years (12.9%) compared with adults aged 40–49 years (8.3%). Coverage was significantly lower for Hispanics (7.1%) compared with non-Hispanic whites (12.5%). Characteristics independently associated with a higher likelihood of hepatitis A vaccination among persons aged 18–49 years included younger age groups, persons at or above poverty level, persons with public medical insurance, and persons who received influenza vaccination in the past season.

Conclusions

In 2007, self-reported hepatitis A vaccination coverage among adults aged 18–49 years was 12.1%. These data provide the first national hepatitis A vaccination coverage estimates among adults and are very important in planning and implementing strategies for increasing hepatitis A vaccination coverage among adults at risk for hepatitis A.     

Intradermal and virosomal influenza vaccines for preventing influenza hospitalization in the elderly during the 2011–2012 influenza season: A comparative effectiveness study using the Valencia health care information system

Background

The use of intradermal vaccination or virosomal vaccines could increase protection against influenza among the vulnerable population of older adults. Studies assessing the comparative effectiveness of these two influenza vaccine types in this age group are lacking.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to estimate the comparative effectiveness of intradermal seasonal trivalent-influenza vaccine (TIV) delivered by a microneedle injection system and a virosomal-TIV intramuscularly delivered for prevention of influenza hospitalization in non-institutionalized adults aged ≥65 years. We obtained administrative data on immunization status and influenza hospitalization for the 2011–2012 influenza season, and used Cox regression models to assess comparative effectiveness. We estimated crude and adjusted (age, sex, comorbidity, pharmaceutical claims, recent pneumococcal vaccination and number of hospitalizations for all causes other than influenza between the previous and current influenza seasons) hazard ratios (HR).

Results

Overall, 164,021 vaccinated subjects were evaluated. There were 127 hospitalizations for influenza among 62,058 subjects, contributing 914,740 person-weeks at risk in the virosomal-TIV group, and 133 hospitalizations for influenza among 101,963 subjects, contributing 1,504,570 person-weeks at risk in the intradermal-TIV group. The crude HR of intradermal-TIV relative to virosomal-TIV was 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.81), and the adjusted Cox estimated HR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.52–0.85).

Conclusions

During the 2011–2012 influenza season the risk of hospitalization for influenza was reduced by 33% in non-institutionalized elderly adults who were vaccinated with intradermal-TIV compared with virosomal-TIV.     

Effect of influenza vaccination on hospitalizations in persons aged 50 years and older

Objective

To estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing hospitalizations in persons over 50 years of age.

Design

We performed a retrospective, population based study, using a “difference-in-differences” approach to determine the association between hospitalization and prior vaccination. We examined this association when influenza was not circulating and compared it to the association found when influenza was circulating. VE was estimated from the difference in the association between hospitalization and prior vaccination, inside vs. outside influenza seasons.

Setting

Kaiser Permanente in Northern California.

Patients

Health plan members aged 50 years and older during the September 1997 to August 2008 study period, when there were about 68,000 pneumonia hospitalizations in 10 million person-years.

Results

Vaccination was associated with lower risk of hospitalization for pneumonia and influenza, even before flu season, presumably due to unmeasured confounders. When influenza arrived the hospitalization-vaccination association strengthened, yielding an adjusted VE estimate of 12.4% (95% CI: 1.6–22.0) in persons aged 50–64, and 8.5% (95% CI: 3.3–13.5) in those aged 65 years and older. There was no significant effect on hospitalizations for ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive heart failure (CHF), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), or trauma.

Conclusions

Influenza vaccination has a modest but significant effect on prevention of hospitalization for pneumonia and influenza in persons 50 years of age and older.     

Seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness in pre- and full-term children aged 6–23 months over multiple seasons

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in pre- and full-term children aged 6–23 months.

Methods

We examined a cohort of 683,354 young children (7.7% preterm) over five influenza seasons (2004–2005 to 2008–2009) in Ontario, Canada. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using influenza-coded ambulatory visits during virologically-confirmed influenza season periods as the outcome and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

Full vaccination was associated with a 19% reduction in influenza-coded ambulatory visits (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68–0.97) in all children, and an 18% reduction in full-term children (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68–0.99). We did not find significant vaccine effectiveness for preterm children. No benefit was found for partial vaccination.

Conclusions

In children younger than two years, only full influenza vaccination is associated with reduced influenza-coded ambulatory visits. Since the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in preterm children remains uncertain, further study of this highly vulnerable population is warranted.     

National and state-specific estimates of place of influenza vaccination among adult populations – United States, 2011–12 influenza season

Background

Annual influenza vaccination has been recommended for all persons ≥6 months since the 2010–11 season. New partnerships between public health agencies and medical and nonmedical vaccination providers have increased the number of vaccination providers and locations where vaccination services are delivered.

Methods

Data from the 2011–12 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were analyzed. Point estimates of place of vaccination and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression and predictive marginal modeling were conducted to identify factors associated with vaccination settings.

Results

Among adults vaccinated during the 2011–12 influenza season, a doctor's office was the most common place (38.4%) for receipt of influenza vaccination, with stores (e.g., supermarkets or drug stores) (20.1%) the next common, and workplaces (17.6%) the third common. Overall, reported vaccination in nonmedical settings by state ranged from 32.2% in California to 60.4% in Nevada, with a median of 45.8%. Characteristics significantly associated with an increased likelihood of receipt of vaccination in nonmedical settings were higher education, not having certain identified high-risk conditions, not having had a routine checkup in the previous 12 months, and not having a primary doctor for health care. Being a member of a racial/ethnic minority group, unemployed or not in the work force were significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of receipt of vaccination in nonmedical settings.

Conclusion

Doctor's offices were the most common medical setting for adult influenza vaccination; workplaces and stores were important nonmedical settings. Increasing access to vaccination services in medical and nonmedical settings should be considered as important strategies for improving vaccination coverage. These results also can help guide development of strategies for achieving Healthy People 2020 objectives for influenza vaccination of adult populations.     

Is the adjuvanted influenza vaccine more effective than the trivalent inactivated vaccine in the elderly population? Results of a case–control study

Introduction

Influenza illness is an important public health problem and annual vaccination is globally recommended for high risk populations.

Objective

The aim was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in reducing hospitalizations for influenza or pneumonia during two influenza seasons in the elderly.

Methods

A case–control study was performed, using administrative database of the Local Health Unit Roma-A (LHU RM-A). The included subjects were at least 65 years old and residing in one of the four districts of the LHU. The cases were hospitalized for influenza or pneumonia during influenza season in the years 2010–2011 and 2011–2012. The controls were hospitalized in the same period, but not for influenza or pneumonia. The subjects were immunized with the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in the first influenza season (2010–2011) and with the adjuvanted influenza vaccine MF59 (ATIV) in the second season (2011–2012).

Results

A total of 269 cases and 1247 controls were included for the 2010–2011 influenza season, and 365 cases and 1227 controls were selected for the 2011–2012 season. Up to 63.6% cases and 53.5% controls in the 2010–2011 season and 78.6% of cases and 64.1% of controls in the 2011–2012 season have not been vaccinated. Female gender and high educational level were protective factors for hospitalization. Subjects over 75 years were at high risk of hospitalization compared to 65–74 years olds. Influenza vaccination reduced significantly hospitalization in both seasons. In subjects with 65–74 years TIV was more effective than ATIV; vice versa for those over 75 years old.

Discussion and conclusion

TIV and ATIV reduce hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia with a variable degree of protection in different age groups. In particular, ATIV is more effective in individuals over 75 years old.     

Qualitative evaluation of Rhode Island's healthcare worker influenza vaccination regulations

Objective

To evaluate Rhode Island's revised vaccination regulations requiring healthcare workers (HCWs) to receive annual influenza vaccination or wear a mask during patient care when influenza is widespread.

Design

Semi-structured telephone interviews conducted in a random sample of healthcare facilities.

Setting

Rhode Island healthcare facilities covered by the HCW regulations, including hospitals, nursing homes, community health centers, nursing service agencies, and home nursing care providers.Participants Staff responsible for collecting and/or reporting facility-level HCW influenza vaccination data to comply with Rhode Island HCW regulations.

Methods

Interviews were transcribed and individually coded by interviewers to identify themes; consensus on coding differences was reached through discussion. Common themes and illustrative quotes are presented.

Results

Many facilities perceived the revised regulations as extending their existing influenza vaccination policies and practices. Despite variations in implementation, nearly all facilities implemented policies that complied with the minimum requirements of the regulations. The primary barrier to implementing the HCW regulations was enforcement of masking among unvaccinated HCWs, which required timely tracking of vaccination status and additional time and effort by supervisors. Factors facilitating implementation included early and regular communication from the state health department and facilities’ ability to adapt existing influenza vaccination programs to incorporate provisions of the revised regulations.

Conclusions

Overall, facilities successfully implemented the revised HCW regulations during the 2012–2013 influenza season. Continued maintenance of the regulations is likely to reduce transmission of influenza and resulting morbidity and mortality in Rhode Island's healthcare facilities.     

Influenza vaccination in HIV-infected individuals: Systematic review and assessment of quality of evidence related to vaccine efficacy,effectiveness and safety

Background

Influenza infection in HIV-infected individuals is associated with increased severity of illness. We performed a systematic review of the available evidence on efficacy, effectiveness and safety of seasonal influenza vaccination in HIV-infected individuals.

Design

Systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of evidence quality.

Methods

Using a previous systematic review as starting point, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane data base for studies on efficacy, effectiveness or safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIV) in HIV-infected individuals. Evidence quality was assessed for each outcome using the GRADE methodology.

Results

Three randomized-controlled trials and three cohort studies were identified, including a total of 1562 HIV-infected individuals. In adults, TIV prevented laboratory-confirmed influenza with a pooled efficacy of 85% (95% CI, 22–97%) (evidence quality: moderate), but no significant effects on other clinical outcomes were observed (evidence quality: moderate to low). One cohort study showed an effectiveness of 71% (95% CI, 44–85%) for prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza, whereas no effect on influenza-like illness was found. However, risk of bias was high in all observational studies. In children aged 6–59 months, efficacy of TIV in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza was 11% (95% CI, −30 to 54%) (evidence quality: moderate). Regarding other endpoints, no statistically significant effects were reported (evidence quality: moderate to low). No severe adverse events following influenza vaccination were observed in these studies.

Conclusion

This systematic review indicates that TIV is effective in preventing influenza infection in HIV-infected adults but not in young children. For both age-groups, only limited evidence exists for other outcomes, indicating a need for further studies.     

Factors associated with influenza vaccine receipt in community dwelling adults and their children

Background

Factors associated with influenza vaccine receipt are well studied in healthcare personnel, pregnant women, and the elderly. There has been substantially less research in community dwelling adults and children, and none among entire households. Many studies determine vaccination status by self-report or behavioral intention, outcomes susceptible to misclassification. Given that vaccine is recommended for everyone over six months, re-evaluating these factors is warranted.

Methods

The Household Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (HIVE) study is a prospective cohort of households with children. In 2010–2011, 549 adults representing 312 households completed surveys evaluating knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding influenza vaccination for themselves and their children. Using the health belief model (HBM) as a framework, we examined factors associated with documented seasonal influenza vaccine receipt using log-binomial regression models.

Results

In multivariate models, cues to action such as doctor recommendation, (RR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.25–2.10), perceived benefits (RR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04–1.50), and perceived susceptibility (RR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03–1.42) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of vaccine receipt among adults while high perceived barriers were associated with decreased likelihood (RR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25–0.59). Similarly, parents reporting higher barriers were less likely (RR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42–0.79) and those perceiving greater benefits (RR 4.16, 95% CI: 2.28–7.59) and severity (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00–1.27 were more likely to vaccinate their children. The observed effects of perceptions of susceptibility, severity, and benefits were more pronounced at low cues to action for children, as were the effects of perceptions of barriers and severity among adults.

Conclusion

Perceived benefits and barriers are most strongly associated with vaccine receipt. However, the effects of various factors were most pronounced in the absence of cues to action, which may be an important component of targeted interventions.     

Knowledge,attitudes and vaccination coverage of healthcare workers regarding occupational vaccinations

Objectives

Immunization of healthcare workers (HCWs) is a major issue for infection control in healthcare facilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate knowledge regarding occupational vaccinations, HBV, varicella and influenza vaccination rates and attitudes towards influenza vaccine among HCWs.

Design and setting

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two wards (Medicine and Paediatrics) of a 1182-bed teaching hospital in Paris, France.

Methods

A standardized, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was used.

Results

Of 580 HCWs, 395 (68%) completed the questionnaire. Knowledge about the occupational vaccinations of HCWs was low. HBV (69%), tuberculosis (54%) and influenza (52%) were the most cited vaccinations. Paediatric staff was more aware of influenza and pertussis immunizations (p < .05). HBV vaccination rate was 93%, among whom 65% were aware of their immune status. Influenza vaccination rate for 2006–2007 was 30% overall, ranging from 50% among physicians to 20% among paramedical staff (p < .05). Physicians based their refusal on doubts about vaccine efficacy, although paramedics feared side effects. Influenza vaccination was associated with knowledge of vaccine recommendations [OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.13–2.57] and contact with patients [OR = 3.05, 95% CI: 1.50–5.91].

Conclusions

Knowledge of recommended occupational vaccinations is insufficient in HCWs, except for HBV and influenza. Although the HBV vaccine coverage of HCWs is satisfactory, a large proportion of them is unaware of immune status. Influenza vaccine coverage remains low, especially among paramedical staff because of fear of side effects. As vaccine coverage is associated with knowledge, educational campaigns should be strengthened to increase the adhesion of HCWs to vaccinations.     

Correlates of general practitioners’ recommendations to patients regarding vaccination for the 2009–2010 pandemic influenza (A/H1N1) in France: Implications for future vaccination campaigns

Background

General practitioners’ (GPs) recommendations to their patients regarding influenza vaccination is a key determinant of patient uptake of influenza vaccination.

Objectives

To study factors associated with GPs’ recommendations regarding pandemic vaccination (pvaccination) to adults ≤65 years of age (hereafter referred to as adults) at risk and not at risk of severe complications of the 2009–2010 A/H1N1 influenza.

Patients/Methods

National cross-sectional survey of 1431 French GPs. Pvaccination recommendations by GPs to adults were studied according to three categories: recommended pvaccination to at-risk adults only; recommended pvaccination to all adults; recommended against pvaccination or did not provide any advice to any adult.

Results

GPs were more likely to recommend pvaccination to at-risk than not-at-risk adults (73.4% vs 40.1%, p < 0.01). GPs who consulted official sources of information rather than news media during the pandemic were more likely to recommend pvaccination to at-risk adults only (OR = 1.78; CI 95% = 1.27–2.48) and to all adults (OR = 2.03; CI 95% = 1.42–2.92) than other GPs. GPs’ unfavorable perceptions of the risk/efficacy balance of the pandemic vaccine (pvaccine) together with their perceptions of the low severity of the disease were negatively associated with recommending pvaccination. Hospitalization of GPs’ patients because of the influenza was specifically associated with pvaccine recommendation to all adults (OR = 2.81; CI 95% = 1.98–3.99) but not with pvaccine recommendation to at-risk adults only.

Conclusion

In the pandemic context, GPs’ perceptions of disease severity and the risk/efficacy balance of the pvaccine were the major determinants of French GPs recommending pvaccination or not. To increase the general public's acceptability of vaccination policies, GPs should be adequately informed about the course of the epidemics and the safety of the vaccine.     

Sustained high influenza vaccination rates and decreased safety concerns among pregnant women during the 2010–2011 influenza season

Objective

Intense efforts to vaccinate pregnant women against 2009 H1N1 influenza resulted in much higher vaccine uptake than previously reported. We surveyed postpartum women to determine whether high vaccination rates were sustained during the 2010–11 influenza season.

Methods

We performed cross-sectional surveys of postpartum women delivering at our institution during February–April 2010 and February–March 2011. The surveys ascertained maternal characteristics, history of influenza vaccination, and reasons for lack of vaccination.

Results

During the 2010–11 season, 165 (55%) of 300 women surveyed reported receiving influenza vaccination, compared to 191 of 307 (62%) during 2009–10 (p = 0.08). Vaccination by an obstetrical provider was common, but decreased compared to 2009–10 (60% vs. 71%, p = 0.04). While most women (76%) in 2010–11 reported that their provider recommended influenza vaccination, significantly more reported lack of discussion about vaccination (24% vs. 11%, p < 0.01) compared to 2009–10. Vaccine safety concerns were cited by most (66%) women declining vaccination during 2009–10 but only 27% of women who declined in 2010–11.

Conclusion

The vaccination rate among pregnant women at our institution was relatively sustained, although fewer providers appear to be discussing influenza vaccination in pregnancy. Concern about vaccine safety, the primary barrier during 2009–10, was much less prominent.     

Voluntary reporting of health care personnel seasonal influenza vaccination rates and the impact of universal policies in Illinois hospitals

Objective

In 2009, voluntary public reporting of hospital health care personnel (HCP) vaccination rates began in Illinois. We describe our experience over 3 influenza seasons and examine the impact universal policies have had on performance.

Methods

A secure website was used to report monthly HCP vaccination rates by each participating hospital. Overall and individual hospital performance was publicly reported each month.

Results

In the first two seasons, there were 11 hospitals reporting with an average end of season rate of 76% (2009–2010) and 81% (2010–2011). In the 2011–2012 season, there were 22 hospitals reporting, 9 of which had a new universal policy for HCP influenza vaccination. The average 2011–2012 end of season rate was 72% for hospitals with a voluntary program and 95% for hospitals with a universal policy. HCP were also vaccinated earlier in the influenza season when a universal policy was in place, providing greater benefit over time.

Conclusion

Public reporting of HCP influenza vaccination rates may contribute to implementation of universal employee vaccination policies. Hospitals with universal policies have higher vaccination rates than those with voluntary vaccination programs.     

Statut vaccinal des médecins généralistes dans le département de la Loire,France

Objectives

We surveyed the vaccination status of family physicians (FP) in the Loire district (France) in 2010.

Subjects and methods

A self-administered questionnaire was proposed to a panel of 460 FP; 288 (64%) answered.

Results

The vaccination coverage for Diphtheria-Tetanus-Polio in the previous 10 years, BCG, pertussis, seasonal influenza, A/H1N1 2009 influenza, and hepatitis B was 81, 74, 59, 73, 65, and 87% respectively. Sixty-four percent of FP reported they were vaccinated against measles and 49% against chicken pox; 76% were aware of vaccination recommendations for healthcare professionals but 41% wanted more information on the subject. The younger physicians were better vaccinated for Diphtheria-Tetanus-Polio, measles, hepatitis B, and influenza according to a multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

The vaccinations of FP (knowledge, practice) must be improved, especially by yearly updates, continuous medical education, and medical follow-up of healthcare professionals.     

Theory-based predictors of influenza vaccination among pregnant women

Background

Guidelines recommend influenza vaccination for pregnant women, but vaccine uptake in this population is far below the goal set by Healthy People 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of seasonal influenza vaccination among pregnant women.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2012, the Vaccines and Medications in Pregnancy Surveillance System (VAMPSS) conducted a prospective cohort study of influenza vaccine safety among pregnant women in the US and Canada that oversampled vaccinated women. Data for the present paper are from an additional cross-sectional telephone survey completed during the 2010–2011 influenza season. We examined predictors of influenza vaccination, focusing on Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs.

Results

We surveyed 199 pregnant women, 81% of whom had received a seasonal influenza vaccine. Vaccination was more common among women who felt more susceptible to influenza (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.10–3.01), who perceived greater vaccine effectiveness (OR = 3.92, 95% CI 1.48–10.43), and whose doctors recommended they have flu shots (OR = 3.06, 95% CI 1.27–7.38). Those who perceived greater barriers of influenza vaccination had lower odds of vaccination (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.05–0.75). Perceived social norms, anticipated inaction regret, and worry also predicted uptake, though demographic characteristics of respondents did not.

Conclusion

The HBM provides a valuable framework for exploring influenza vaccination among pregnant women. Our results suggest several potential areas of intervention to improve vaccination rates.     

Influenza vaccination during pregnancy: Coverage rates and influencing factors in two urban districts in Sydney

Background

Pregnant women have an increased risk of complications from influenza. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy is considered effective and safe; however estimates of vaccine coverage are low. This study aimed to determine influenza vaccination coverage and factors associated with vaccine uptake in pregnant women in two Sydney-based health districts.

Methods

A random sample of women who delivered a baby in a public hospital in Sydney and South-Western Sydney Local Health Districts between June and September 2012 were surveyed using a computer assisted telephone interviewing service.

Results

Of the 462 participants (participation rate 92%), 116 (25%) reported receiving the influenza vaccine during their pregnancy. In univariate analysis, vaccination coverage varied significantly depending on antenatal care type, hospital of birth, and parity (p<0.05), but not for age category, highest level of education, country of birth, language spoken at home, or Aboriginal status. Women who received antenatal care through a general practitioner (GP) had 2.3 (95% CI 1.4–3.6) times the odds (unadjusted) of receiving the influenza vaccination than those who received their antenatal care through a public hospital. The main reason cited for vaccination was GP recommendation (37%), while non-recommendation (33%) and lack of knowledge (26%) were cited as main reasons for not receiving the vaccination. 30% of women recalled receiving a provider recommendation for the vaccination and these women had 33.0 times the odds (unadjusted) of receiving the vaccination than women who had not received a recommendation. In a multivariate model a provider recommendation was the only variable that was significantly associated with vaccination (OR 41.9; 95% CI 20.7–84.9).

Conclusion

Rates of influenza vaccination during pregnancy are low. There is a significant relationship between healthcare provider recommendation for the vaccination and vaccine uptake. Increasing provider recommendation rates has the potential to increase coverage rates of influenza vaccination in pregnant women.