Growth hormone secretion by individual somatotropes of the testicular feminized rat

To investigate the cellular mechanisms underlying the unique GH secretory apparatus of the androgen-resistant testicular feminized (Tfm) rat we employed a reverse hemolytic plaque assay to assess GH secretion by individual cells from normal male, normal female, and Tfm rats. Acutely dispersed pituitary cells were incubated for 90 min with GH anti-serum in the presence of medium alone, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 nM GHRH, or 3 microM forskolin after which hemolytic plaques were developed over an additional 30 min. Body weights of the Tfm rats [318 +/- 7 g (mean +/- SEM)] were intermediate between intact males (372 +/- 18 g) and females (218 +/- 7 g). The total number of cells recovered from dispersion of Tfm rat pituitaries [3.20 +/- 0.42 X 10(6) (mean +/- SEM)] was greater than that from males (1.43 +/- 0.12 X 10(6); P = 0.001), but not distinguishable from that from females (2.31 +/- 0.30 X 10(6); P = 0.06). However, the absolute population of recovered somatotropes from the Tfm animals (1.24 +/- 0.22 X 10(6) exceeded both male (0.56 +/- 0.10 X 10(6); P = 0.002) and female (0.80 +/- 0.14 X 10(6); P = 0.046) values. Mean basal and maximal GH plaque areas were greater for cells from male rats than for those from either female or Tfm rats (P less than 0.05) regardless of whether GHRH or forskolin was used as the secretagogue. Plaque areas from female and Tfm cells were indistinguishable under all study conditions. These data suggest that a deficiency of androgen receptors prevents establishment of the greater GH secretory capacity of individual somatotropes characteristic of the adult male rat. This androgen receptor-dependent modulation of GH secretory capacity appears to occur at a step distal to the GHRH receptor. The data also suggest that an increase in the absolute population of somatotropes is an additional consequence of androgen receptor deficiency. This combination of individual somatotropes, each possessing a GH secretory capacity similar to that of cells from normal females, but present in greater absolute numbers, may explain the intermediate values found during previous studies of the Tfm rat GH axis which were based on assessment of large mixed populations of pituitary cells.     

Somatostatin inhibition of growth hormone secretion by somatotropes from male, female, and androgen receptor-deficient rats: evidence for differing sensitivities

To investigate the role of somatostatin (SRIF) in regulating sexually dimorphic GH secretion, we used a reverse hemolytic plaque assay and acutely dispersed somatotropes from age-matched normal male, normal female, and androgen receptor-deficient, testicular feminized (Tfm) rats. Hemolytic plaques were developed after a 90-min incubation in the presence of GH antiserum, 10 nM GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), and the following concentrations of SRIF: 0, 0.001, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 nM. Additional studies were performed with 0 or 100 nM SRIF in the absence of GHRH. The absolute number of somatotropes (x10(6); mean +/- SEM) recovered from the pituitaries of Tfm rats (1.73 +/- 0.18) was significantly greater than that from the males (1.11 +/- 0.13; P = 0.01); the number from female rats (1.30 +/- 0.15) was not different from that of either male or Tfm animals. GHRH-stimulated GH secretion, as estimated by the mean GH plaque area (micron2 x 10(4); mean +/- SEM) in the absence of SRIF, was greater for somatotropes from male rats (3.36 +/- 0.41) than that for either Tfm (2.27 +/- 0.32; P = 0.02) or female (1.78 +/- 0.24; P = 0.001) rats; values for the latter two groups did not differ. However, mean GH plaque areas for each group during maximal SRIF inhibition in either the presence or absence of GHRH were indistinguishable from each other and from mean plaque areas obtained under basal conditions. As demonstrated by a lesser EC50 value (0.04 +/- 0.02 nM; mean +/- SEM), somatotropes from female rats were more sensitive to the inhibitory effect of SRIF than were those from either male (EC50 = 1.82 +/- 0.45; P = 0.0001) or Tfm (EC50 = 0.74 +/- 0.22, P = 0.0001) rats; values for the latter two groups were indistinguishable. These observed differences suggest that gender and/or the gonadal hormone environment may be important determinants of the inhibitory effects of SRIF on GH secretion by the somatotrope. While these gender-associated differences may represent effects of the gonadal hormones directly on the somatotrope, they could reflect modulation of the secretion of hypothalamic SRIF and/or GHRH by the prevailing gonadal hormone environment. Such gender-related differences may contribute to the overall sex-dependent patterns of GH secretion in the intact animal.     

Differential expression of gonadotropin and prolactin antigens by GHRH target cells from male and female rats.

There is a 2- to 3-fold increase in luteinizing hormone-beta (LHbeta) or follicle-stimulating hormone-beta (FSHbeta) antigen-bearing gonadotropes during diestrus in preparation for the peak LH or FSH secretory activity. This coincides with an increase in cells bearing LHbeta or FSHbeta mRNA. Similarly, there is a 3- to 4-fold increase in the percentage of cells that bind GnRH. In 1994, we reported that this augmentation in gonadotropes may come partially from subsets of somatotropes that transitionally express LHbeta or FSHbeta mRNA and GnRH-binding sites. The next phase of the study focused on questions relating to the somatotropes themselves. Do these putative somatogonadotropes retain a somatotrope phenotype? As a part of ongoing studies that address this question, a biotinylated analog of GHRH was produced, separated by HPLC and characterized for its ability to elicit the release of GH as well as bind to pituitary target cells. The biotinylated analog (Bio-GHRH) was detected cytochemically by the avidin-peroxidase complex technique. It could be displaced by competition with 100-1000 nM GHRH but not corticotropin-releasing hormone or GnRH. In cells from male rats exposed to 1 nM Bio-GHRH, 28+/-6% (mean+/-s.d) of pituitary cells exhibited label for Bio-GHRH (compared with 0.8+/-0.6% in the controls). There were no differences in percentages of GHRH target cells in populations from proestrous (28+/-5%) and estrous (25+/-5%) rats. Maximal percentages of labeled cells were seen following addition of 1 nM analog for 10 min. In dual-labeled fields, GHRH target cells contained all major pituitary hormones, but their expression of ACTH and TRH was very low (less than 3% of the pituitary cell population) and the expression of prolactin (PRL) and gonadotropins varied with the sex and stage of the animal. In all experimental groups, 78-80% of Bio-GHRH-reactive cells contained GH (80-91% of GH cells). In male rats, 33+/-6% of GHRH target cells contained PRL (37+/-9% of PRL cells) and less than 20% of these GHRH-receptive cells contained gonadotropins (23+/-1% of LH and 31+/-9% of FSH cells). In contrast, expression of PRL and gonadotropins was found in over half of the GHRH target cells from proestrous female rats (55+/-10% contained PRL; 56+/-8% contained FSHbeta; and 66+/-1% contained LHbeta). This reflected GHRH binding by 71+/-2% PRL cells, 85+/-5% of LH cells and 83+/-9% of FSH cells. In estrous female rats, the hormonal storage patterns in GHRH target cells were similar to those in the male rat. Because the overall percentages of cells with Bio-GHRH or GH label do not vary among the three groups, the differences seen in the proestrous group reflect internal changes within a single group of somatotropes that retain their GHRH receptor phenotype. Hence, these data correlate with earlier findings that showed that somatotropes may be converted to transitional gonadotropes just before proestrus secretory activity. The LH and FSH antigen content of the GHRH target cells from proestrous rats demonstrates that the LHbeta and FSHbeta mRNAs are indeed translated. Furthermore, the increased expression of PRL antigens by these cells signifies that these convertible somatotropes may also be somatomammotropes.     

Direct modification of somatotrope function by long-term leptin treatment of primary cultured ovine pituitary cells.

Leptin is produced primarily in adipocytes and regulates body energy balance. A close link between leptin and pituitary hormones, including GH, has been reported. The mechanisms employed by leptin to influence somatotropes are not clear, however. Here we report a direct action of recombinant ovine leptin on primary cultured ovine somatotropes by analyzing the levels of mRNA encoding for GH or the receptors for GHRH (GHRH-R) and GH-releasing peptides (GHRP). Treatment of ovine somatotropes with leptin (10(-7)-10(-9) M) for 1-3 d reduced the mRNA levels encoding GH and GHRH-R, but increased GHRP receptor mRNA levels in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Three-day treatment of cells with leptin decreased the GH response to GHRH stimulation, but the GH response to GHRP-2 stimulation was increased. The combined effect of GHRH and GHRP-2 on GH secretion was not altered by treatment of the cells with leptin. These results demonstrated a direct action of leptin on ovine pituitary cells, leading to a reduced sensitivity of somatotropes to GHRH. It is also suggested that GHRP may be useful to correct the decrease in GHRH-induced GH secretion by leptin.     

Growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to combined administration of arginine and GH-releasing hormone does not vary with age in man

At present, the mechanism(s) underlying the reduced spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion in aging is still unclear. To obtain new information on this mechanism(s), the GH responses to both single and combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 1 microgram/kg iv) and arginine (ARG; 30 g infused over 30 min), a well known GH secretagogue probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, were studied in seven elderly normal subjects and seven young healthy subjects. Basal GH levels were similar in both groups, while insulin-like growth factor-I levels were lower in elderly subjects (76.7 +/- 9.2 vs. 258.3 +/- 29.2 micrograms/L; P = 0.01). In aged subjects GHRH induced a GH increase (area under the curve, 314.9 +/- 91.9 micrograms/L.h) which was lower (P = 0.01) than that in young subjects (709.1 +/- 114.4 micrograms/L.h). On the other hand, the ARG-induced GH increase in the elderly was not significantly different from that in young subjects (372.8 +/- 81.8 vs. 470.6 +/- 126.5 micrograms/L.h). ARG potentiated GH responsiveness to GHRH in both elderly (1787.1 +/- 226.0 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.0001 vs. GHRH alone) and young subjects (2113.0 +/- 444.3 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.001 vs. GHRH alone). The potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH response was greater in elderly than in young subjects (1013.0 +/- 553.5% vs. 237.9 +/- 79.1%; P = 0.0001); thus, the GH increase induced by combined administration of ARG and GHRH overlapped in two groups. In conclusion, these results show that, differently from the GHRH-induced GH increase, the somatotroph response to combined administration of ARG and GHRH does not vary with age. Our finding suggests that an increased somatostatinergic activity may underlie the reduced GH secretion in normal aging.     

Semiquantification of hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone output in women: evidence for sexual dimorphism in the mechanism of the somatopause.

The neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying the decline of GH with aging (somatopause) are uncertain. We recently found that the age-dependent diminution of the hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) output contributes to the somatopause in men. As the regulatory mechanisms of GH secretion are sexually dimorphic, we assessed the suppressibility of spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion by graded doses of a specific competitive GHRH receptor antagonist in nine young (20-27 yr old) and eight elderly (65-77 yr old) healthy nonobese women to semiquantify hypothalamic GHRH output. Nocturnal mean GH was lower in elderly women (2.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.2 microg/liter; P = 0.01). Graded boluses of GHRH-44 resulted in similar GH responses in both populations (P = 0.28). Graded infusions of GHRH antagonist inhibited in a dose-dependent manner the GH responses to GHRH in both groups (P = 0.0001-0.04). The dose-inhibition curve for the lowest GHRH bolus dose was shifted to the left compared with the highest one (P = 0.04). However, the dose-inhibition curves for spontaneous GH secretion were not different in young and elderly women (P = 0.50). Thus, the female somatopause is not associated with a measurable decrease in hypothalamic GHRH output. When the dose-inhibition curves for young men and young women were compared, the latter was shifted to the left (P = 0.009), suggesting that the somatotropic system in women operates with less GHRH. We conclude that the contribution of endogenous GHRH to the maintenance of GH secretion and the neuroendocrine mechanisms of somatopause in humans are sexually dimorphic.     

Different regulation of growth hormone-releasing factor-sensitive adenylate cyclase in the anterior pituitary of young and aged rats

Low basal GH secretion and reduced GH responsiveness to different GH secretagogues, including GHRF, have been reported in aged animals and humans. Parallel to the in vivo findings, an impaired GH responsiveness to GHRF is evident in somatotropes from old rats of either sex. We report here that in anterior pituitaries (APs) from aged male and female rats GHRF-induced stimulation of adenylate cyclase (AC) activity was strikingly reduced (male rats, change from baseline 700% in young and 100% in old rats) or lacking (female rats, change from baseline 430% in young and 13% in old rats) when compared to that evoked by GHRF in the APs from young counterparts. Pretreatment with GHRH (5 micrograms/rat iv for 3 days) decreased the high basal AC activity of old male rats [from 33.38 +/- 3.60 to 15.99 +/- 5.75 (SEM) pmol cAMP/min.mg protein], did not alter the GHRF-stimulated rise in AC activity in old male rats, and induced a small but unequivocal rise in AC activity in old female rats (change from baseline 35% vs. 13%, respectively). Pretreatment with GHRF markedly reduced the acute effect of GHRF in the APs from young rats of both sexes (male rats, change from baseline 360% and 700%; female rats, change from baseline 230% and 430% in GHRF-pretreated and control rats, respectively). In parallel studies performed in female rats, it was shown that in vivo pretreatment with GHRF at the same schedule markedly reduced the effect of acute GHRF stimulation on GH secretion from cultured pituitary cells of young rats but left unchanged GHRF-induced stimulation of GH secretion from pituitary cells of old rats. In all, these data suggest that deficiency of endogenous GHRF synthesis and/or release may underlie defective GH secretion in old rats and that a GHRF replacement regimen that reduces the sensitivity of the young somatotrope cells does not alter the sensitivity of (male rats) or exerts a priming effect (female rats) on the old somatotrope cell.     

Effects of gonadal steroids on somatotroph function in the rat: analysis by the reverse hemolytic plaque assay

The mechanism by which gonadal steroids modulate GH secretion is not known. We have used the reverse hemolytic plaque assay to examine whether gonadal steroid-induced modulation of GH secretion is effected by changes in the population of somatotrophs and/or alterations in their secretory properties. Two groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were studied: group 1 (n = 6) comprised male (M), castrate (Cx), and testosterone-replaced castrate male (Cx + T) rats and group 2 (n = 5) consisted of male (M), female (F), and 17 beta-estradiol-replaced castrate male (Cx + E) rats. The number of plaque-forming cells (expressed as both absolute number and a percentage of all cells) was determined, and secretory status was assessed by measuring plaque areas in response to 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 nM GHRH. While mean basal GH plaque areas were similar among the treatment groups of group 1, the maximal GH plaque area was significantly decreased in Cx [16.8 +/- 2.4 vs. 26.4 +/- 3.9 X 10(6) microns2 (mean +/- SEM); P less than 0.05], but not in Cx + T (27.5 +/- 4.1 microns2) rats. The GHRH EC50 was unaffected by castration or T replacement. The percentage and absolute population of somatotrophs were reduced in Cx, but not in Cx + T, rats, while the numbers of lactotrophs remained unchanged in these treatment groups. For group 2, the mean peak GH plaque area was reduced in Cx + E (16.5 +/- 2.9 microns2; P less than 0.001) compared to that in M rats (36.2 +/- 2.3 microns2), but was not significantly different from that in F (13.0 +/- 1.5 microns2) rats. The EC50 was significantly (P less than 0.025) greater in Cx + E (10.9 +/- 2.3 nM) and F (7.9 +/- 1.6 nM) compared to M rats (2.8 +/- 0.7 nM). The absolute somatotroph and lactotroph populations were increased in Cx + E compared to M and F rats, as were the populations of other pituitary cell types. Testosterone enhances GH secretion by increasing the secretory capacity, but not the sensitivity, of somatotrophs to GHRH and by recruiting the function of a subpopulation of somatotrophs. Estradiol reduces the secretory capacity and sensitivity of somatotrophs to GHRH, but increases the population of somatotrophs, lactotrophs, and non-GH- and non-PRL-secreting cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Physiological testosterone replenishment in healthy elderly men does not normalize pituitary growth hormone output: evidence against the connection between senile hypogonadism and somatopause

Normal aging in men is accompanied by lower serum testosterone (T), GH, and IGF-I concentrations. The mechanisms of the age-related diminution in the activity of the somatotropic axis (somatopause) are uncertain. Several explanations have been proposed, including a lower hypothalamic GHRH output. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the physiological hypogonadism that accompanies normal aging is responsible for GHRH deficiency. We assessed the suppressibility of spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion by a specific competitive GHRH receptor antagonist in seven elderly (61-76 yr old) and six young (20-23 yr old) healthy nonobese men. Elderly men then received transdermal T (5 mg/d) for 5-6 wk and had the same experiment repeated. Mean final total T, free T, and dihydrotestosterone increased in elderly men [521.5 +/- 56.3 vs. 395.4 +/- 57.2 ng/dl (P = 0.021), 13.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 10.1 +/- 1.7 pg/ml (P = 0.017), and 71.4 +/- 8.9 vs. 41 +/- 8.1 ng/dl (P = 0.004), respectively] to the levels found in their younger controls, but estradiol did not change (19.1 +/- 2.5 vs. 18.5 +/- 2.9 pg/ml; P = 0.67). GH pulse frequency or amplitude and maximum GH were not altered, and the integrated GH concentrations actually decreased. The percent suppression of GH output in the elderly did not change during GHRH antagonist infusion (35.8 +/- 2.6% vs. 27.7 +/- 6.5%; P = 0.29). We conclude that the T deficiency of old age is unlikely to be the proximate cause of the somatopause.     

Sex difference in growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone between pubertal tall girls and boys

In adult rats and also in young adults, a sex difference in GH responsiveness to GHRH has been reported with the higher responses in males. In young rats, however, the reverse has been found, i.e. a higher GH response in females than in males. This discrepancy promoted us to compare GH responsiveness to GHRH in midpubertal tall girls (N = 10) and boys (N = 8). An iv bolus administration of 100 micrograms of GHRH to these adolescents disclosed a sex difference in GH responsiveness. At all time intervals up to 30 min after the bolus, the GH responses to GHRH in the girls were significantly higher than in the boys (P less than 0.025 - P less than 0.05), whereas the peak GH increments (34 +/- 4 vs 19 +/- 3 micrograms/l; P less than 0.02) were about twice as high in the former as in the latter. The data suggest that like in rats, also in humans, sex-related changes in pituitary GH sensitivity to GHRH may be an important factor in the pubertal growth and development at least in tall girls and boys.     

Pyridostigmine partially restores the GH responsiveness to GHRH in normal aging

In 11 elderly normal subjects and in 17 young healthy subjects we studied the response of plasma growth hormone to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH(29), 1 microgram/kg iv) alone and preceded by pyridostigmine (120 mg orally 60 min before GHRH), a cholinesterase inhibitor likely able to suppress somatostatin release. The GH response to pyridostigmine alone was also examined. Basal plasma GH levels were similar in elderly and young subjects. In the elderly, GHRH induced a GH rise (AUC, median and range: 207.5, 43.5-444.0 micrograms.l-1.h-1) which was lower (p = 0.006) than that observed in young subjects (548.0, 112.5-2313.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The pyridostigmine-induced GH rise in the elderly was similar to that in young subjects (300.5, 163.0-470.0 vs 265.0, 33.0-514.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1). Pyridostigmine potentiated the GH responsiveness to GHRH in both elderly (437.5, 152.0-1815.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1; p = 0.01 vs GHRH alone) and young subjects (2140.0, 681.5-4429.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1; p = 0.0001 vs GHRH alone). However, the GH response to pyridostigmine + GHRH was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) in elderly than in young subjects. In conclusion, the cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine is able to potentiate the blunted GH response to GHRH in elderly subjects, inducing a GH increase similar to that observed after GHRH alone in young adults. This finding suggests that an alteration of somatostatinergic tone could be involved in the reduced GH secretion in normal aging. However, a decreased GH response to combined administration of pyridostigmine and GHRH in elderly subjects suggests that other abnormalities may coexist, leading to the secretory hypoactivity of somatotropes.     

Effect of galanin on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in acromegaly.

Galanin enhances growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in normal man. In acromegaly, circulating GH levels are increased and the GH response to GHRH may be exaggerated. Galanin has been recently shown to decrease circulating GH levels in acromegaly. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of galanin on the GH response to GHRH in acromegalic subjects. Five acromegalic patients (three men and two women) and seven healthy adult subjects (five men and two women) were studied. GHRH-induced GH secretion was evaluated during a 40-minute intravenous (IV) infusion of saline (100 mL) or porcine galanin (12.5 micrograms/min in 100 mL saline). In normal subjects, delta GH levels after GHRH+porcine galanin administration (47 +/- 7.5 micrograms/L) were significantly higher in comparison to levels obtained with GHRH+saline (21.7 +/- 3.5 micrograms/L, P < .05). In acromegalic patients, GH responses to GHRH (delta GH, 18.8 +/- 8.6 micrograms/L) were not altered by galanin infusion (delta GH, 17.6 +/- 5 micrograms/L). Our results give the first evidence that the same dose of galanin that induces a significant enhancement of the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects has no effect on the GH response to GHRH in acromegalic patients. It can be hypothesized that galanin may interact at the pituitary level with its own receptors expressed by somatotropes independent of GHRH. Failure of galanin to enhance GH response to GHRH in acromegalic patients could be due to a change in function of the galanin receptor on GH-secreting adenomatous cells.     

Aging-related changes in in vivo release of growth hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin from the stalk-median eminence in female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

GH release decreases with aging in primates. However, it is unclear whether the age-related decrease in GH release is due to a decrease in stimulatory GHRH or an increase in inhibitory somatostatin (SS) from the hypothalamus. In the present study, we measured the release of GHRH and SS in the stalk-median eminence of conscious aged (n = 7, 27.0 +/- 0.7 yr old) and young adult female monkeys (n = 12, 5.0 +/- 0.3 yr old) using the push-pull perfusion method. Mean GHRH levels during morning (0600-1200 h) and evening (1800-2400 h) in aged monkeys were 3- to 4-fold lower than in young monkeys. Pulse analysis indicated that pulse frequency, pulse amplitude, and baseline GHRH release in aged monkeys were much lower than in young adults. In contrast, mean SS levels in aged monkeys during mornings and evenings were 2-fold higher than in young monkeys. Pulse analyses indicated that amplitude and baseline levels of SS were significantly higher in aged monkeys than in young adults. There were no significant changes in the pulse frequency of SS release. Therefore, the aging-related decrease in GH release is due to a substantial decrease in GHRH release and an increase in SS release from the hypothalamus.     

Capacity of individual somatotropes to release growth hormone varies according to sex: analysis by reverse hemolytic plaque assay

A reverse hemolytic plaque assay was used to investigate the mechanism(s) underlying sexual differences in GH release which evolve at puberty in rats. The percentages of GH-secreting cells in 24-h pituitary cultures from each sex were similar for pituitary donors up to 30 days of age (range = 38.9% to 41.7% of all cells in culture, n = 3 separate experiments) but decreased by day 50. The decrease was more striking for females (to 24.1 +/- 0.3% mean +/- SE) than for males (to 33.2 +/- 1.1%). However, owing to the greater increase in total pituitary cell number exhibited by female rats at this time, the absolute numbers of somatotropes recovered from male and female pituitaries were almost identical on 50 and 100 days of age. To assess the secretory capacities of individual somatotropes, we measured the sizes of plaques formed. In prepubertal rats (days 10-30), the plaque areas under basal conditions were comparable for males and females at each age studied, and treatment with GH-releasing factor increased plaque sizes to approximately the same degree (10-fold) for both sexes at each age. However, by day 100, plaques that formed under both basal and stimulated conditions were consistently larger (P less than 0.01) for male than for female donors. Taken together, our results demonstrate that sexual differences in GH release are attributable to the secretory capacities of individual somatotropes rather than to differences in the numbers of GH cells in pituitaries of male and female rats.     

Inhibitory effects of ethanol on the growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-GH-insulin-like growth factor-I axis in the rat.

Ethanol administration decreases GH secretion in humans and experimental animals. The mechanism of these inhibitory effects was investigated by evaluating the spontaneous secretory pattern of GH in chronically cannulated unanesthetized rats, plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations, and hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin, and pituitary GH mRNA levels. Body weight gain was reduced in ethanol (5%)-liquid diet-fed rats (n = 6) for 6 days compared to that in both isocalorically pair-fed controls (n = 6) and ad libitum-fed animals (n = 6). Spontaneous GH secretion was markedly decreased (by 75-90%) in ethanol-fed rats compared to that in pair-fed and ad libitum-fed groups, while pulsatile pattern of GH release was preserved, with secretory bursts occurring every 180-220 min in all groups. Mean 6-h plasma GH levels in ethanol-, pair-, and ad libitum-fed animals were: 18.8 +/- 4.5, 113.3 +/- 14.9, and 179.6 +/- 30.1 ng/ml, respectively (P < 0.01, ethanol vs. each control). Plasma IGF-I concentrations were decreased in the ethanol-fed rats (338 +/- 16 ng/ml) compared to those in pair-fed (427 +/- 39 ng/ml; P < 0.05) and ad libitum-fed (769 +/- 25 ng/ml; P < 0.01) rats. Ethanol treatment decreased GHRH mRNA levels to 9% of those in ad libitum-fed (P < 0.01) and 20% of those in pair-fed (P < 0.05) animals, whereas it did not significantly alter somatostatin or GH mRNA levels. The results indicate that the effects of ethanol inhibit GH secretion primarily at the hypothalamic level, resulting in impaired GHRH gene expression. Since the GHRH-GH-IGF-I axis has an important role in growth regulation, the growth retardation seen in experimental models of alcohol abuse may be a consequence at least in part of the suppressive effects of ethanol on this axis.     

Bipotential effects of estrogen on growth hormone synthesis and storage in vitro

Increased pulses of serum GH coincide with rising estrogens during the reproductive cycle, suggesting estrogen regulation. However, there is lack of agreement about estrogen's direct effects on the pituitary. Pituitaries from cycling female rats were dispersed and plated for 24 h in defined media containing vehicle or 0.001-250 nm 17beta-estradiol. Estrogen (0.01-10 nm) increased the percentages of GH antigen-bearing cells in the anterior pituitary significantly (1.3- to 1.6-fold) and 0.01-1 nm concentrations also stimulated significant increases in GH mRNA-bearing cells and in the integrated OD for GH mRNA. However, 100-250 nm either had no effect or, inhibitory effects on the area of label for GH mRNA. To test estrogen's effects on expression of GHRH receptors, cultures were stimulated with biotinylated analogs of GHRH and target cells detected by affinity cytochemistry. Estrogen increased GHRH target cells in populations from rats in all stages of the cycle tested. Basal expression of GHRH target cells declined at metestrus. Cultures treated with 0-1 nm estrogen were then dual labeled for bio-GHRH followed by immunolabeling for GH with the antirabbit IgG-ImmPRESS peroxidase polymer. Over 98% of GH cells bound GHRH and 90-96% of GHRH-bound cells contained GH in all treatment groups. Thus, low concentrations of estrogen may stimulate expression of more cells with GH proteins, biotinylated GHRH binding sites, and GH mRNA, whereas high concentrations have no effect, or may reduce GH mRNA. These bipotential effects may help explain the different findings reported in the literature.     

Impact of estradiol supplementation on dual peptidyl drive of GH secretion in postmenopausal women

As an indirect probe of estrogen-regulated hypothalamic somatostatin restraint, the present study monitors the ability of short-term oral E2 supplementation to modulate GH secretion during combined continuous stimulation by recombinant human GHRH [GHRH-(1-44)-amide] and the potent and selective synthetic GH-releasing peptide, GHRP-2. According to a simplified tripeptidyl model of GH neuroregulation, the effects of estrogen in this dual secretagogue paradigm should mirror alterations in endogenous somatostatinergic signaling. To this end, seven healthy postmenopausal women underwent frequent (10-min) blood sampling for 24 h during simultaneous i.v. infusion of GHRH and GHRP-2 each at a rate of 1 microg/kg x h on d 10 of randomly ordered placebo or 17beta-estradiol (E2) (1 mg orally twice daily) replacement. Serum GH concentrations (n = 280/subject) were assayed by chemiluminescence. The resultant GH time series was evaluated by deconvolution analysis, the approximate entropy statistic, and cosine regression to quantitate pulsatile, entropic (feedback-sensitive), and 24-h rhythmic GH release, respectively. Statistical comparisons revealed that E2 repletion increased the mean (+/- SEM) serum E2 concentration to 222 +/- 26 pg/ml from 16 +/- 1.7 pg/ml during placebo (P < 0.001) and suppressed the serum LH by 48% (P = 0.0033), serum FSH by 64% (P < 0.001), and serum IGF-I by 44% (P = 0.021). Double peptidyl secretagogue stimulation elevated mean 24-h serum GH concentrations to 8.1 +/- 1.0 microg/liter (placebo) and 7.7 +/- 0.89 microg/liter (E2; P = NS) and evoked prominently pulsatile patterns of GH secretion. No primary measure of pulsatile or basal GH release was altered by the disparate sex steroid milieu, i.e. GH secretory burst amplitudes of 0.62 +/- 0.93 (placebo) and 0.72 +/- 0.16 (E2) microg/liter x min, GH pulse frequencies of 27 +/- 1.8 (placebo) and 23 +/- 1.9 (E2) events/24 h, GH half-lives of 12 +/- 0.74 (placebo) and 15 +/- 4.5 (E2) min, and basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion 70 +/- 22 (placebo) and 57 +/- 18 (E2) ng/liter x min. The approximate entropy (ApEn) of serial GH release [1.297 +/- 0.061 (placebo) and 1.323 +/- 0.06 (E2)] and the mesor (cosine mean), amplitude, and acrophase (time of the maximum) of 24-h rhythmic GH secretion were likewise invariant of estrogen supplementation. Estimated statistical power exceeded 90% for detecting significant (P < 0.05) within-subject changes exceeding 30-50% in the mean serum GH concentration, GH ApEn, or GH mesor. In contrast, ApEn analysis of the evolution of successive GH secretory burst-mass values over 24 h disclosed that E2 replacement disrupts the serial regularity of pulsatile GH output (elevates the ApEn ratio) during combined GHRH/GHRP-2 stimulation (P = 0.004). In summary, short-term elevation of serum E2 concentrations in postmenopausal individuals into the midfollicular phase range observed in young women does not significantly alter 24-h basal, pulsatile, entropic, or nyctohemeral GH secretion monitored under continuous combined drive by GHRH and GHRP-2. As E2 repletion without enforced GHRH/GHRP-2 stimulation augments each of the foregoing regulated facets of GH release, we infer that one or both of the infused peptidyl secretagogues may itself participate in E2's short-term amplification of GH secretion in postmenopausal individuals. Estrogen's disruption of the orderliness of sequential GH pulse-mass values during fixed GHRH/GHRP-2 feedforward would be consistent with a subtle reduction in the release and/or actions of hypothalamic somatostatin or an (unexpected) direct pituitary action of the sex steroid. Whether comparable dynamics mediate the effects of endogenous estrogen on the GH axis in premenopausal women or pubertal girls is not known.     

Sexually dimorphic expression of the growth hormone-releasing hormone gene is not mediated by circulating gonadal hormones in the adult rat

The sexual dimorphism characterizing GH secretion in the rat is thought to be related to differences in the hypothalamic synthesis and release of the GH-regulating peptides, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), and somatostatin. Therefore, the influence of gender and sex steroid hormones on hypothalamic expression of the GHRH gene in adult rats were examined. GHRH messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were measured in individual rat hypothalami by Northern hybridization analysis using a 32P-labeled complementary DNA encoding rat GHRH. Destruction of hypothalamic GHRH neurons by neonatal treatment with monosodium glutamate caused similar 3-fold reductions in the levels of GHRH mRNA in adult male and female animals. In three separate experiments, hypothalamic GHRH mRNA concentrations in male rats were 2- to 3-fold greater than in randomly cycling females (four or five rats per group; P less than 0.01). In spite of the greater abundance of GHRH mRNA abundance in the male rat hypothalamus, circulating gonadal steroids lacked the ability to modulate GHRH gene expression in adult animals, since neither gonadectomy nor pharmacological sex steroid replacement changed GHRH mRNA levels in the hypothalamus of male and female adult rats. Furthermore, GHRH mRNA concentrations in female rats were similar during the proestrus, estrus, and diestrus phase of the estrous cycle. Also, GH inhibited hypothalamic GHRH gene expression in a sex-specific manner. Exposure to high levels of GH secreted by the MtTW15 tumor for 4 weeks reduced GHRH mRNA concentrations 7-fold in male rats (P less than 0.001) but only 2-fold in females (P less than 0.05). These studies demonstrate that GHRH gene expression in the rat hypothalamus is sexually dimorphic. Basal mRNA levels are greater in male rats, and expression in male hypothalami is more sensitive to feedback inhibition by GH than expression in females. There is no evidence for regulation of GHRH mRNA levels by either testosterone or estrogen in adult rats. These gender differences in GHRH gene expression likely contribute to the generation of a sex-specific pattern of GH secretion.