The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual X-ray absorptiometry

New developments in dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allow the performance of high precision anteroposterior (AP) and lateral scans of spinal bone mineral density (BMD, units: g/cm²) without the patient moving from the supine position. Data from both projections may be combined to give an estimate of the true volumetric bone mineral density (VBMD, units: g/cm³) of the lumbar vertebral bodies. This report presents a cadaver study designed to validate DXA measurements of volumetric bone density. Sections of whole lumbar spine were scanned in AP and lateral projections in a water tank to simulate soft tissue. Individual vertebrae were then divided to separate the vertebral body from the neural arch, and vertebral body volume was measured using the displacement of sand. The bone mineral content (BMC) of vertebral bodies and neural arches was measured by ashing at 250°C for 60 hours followed by 500°C for a further 24 hours. The results showed that DXA scanning systematically underestimated ashing data by 14% for AP BMC, 33% for vertebral body BMC, 23% for vertebral body volume, and 12% for VBMD. Despite these significant systematic errors, the DXA measurements and ashing values were highly correlated (r=0.979-0.992). The results suggested that after allowing for the systematic errors, lateral DXA parameters related closely to true BMC, volume, and VBMD.     

Differential Effects of Bone Mineral Content and Bone Area on Vertebral Strength in a Swine Model

Since the biomechanical competence of a vertebral body may be closely related to the content and distribution of the bone mineral, we have evaluated the effects of projected vertebral bone area (BA) and bone mineral parameters [bone mineral content (BMC) or bone mineral density (BMD)] on their biomechanical competence. We used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess the bone mineral parameters of 36 swine thoracic vertebrae (T1–T12) and 15 lumbar vertebrae (L1–L5) after removal of the posterior elements. The failure load, compressive stress, and the stored strain energy of these vertebral bodies were assessed by a uniaxial compressive test using an MTS 810 testing system. Multiple regression analysis showed a significantly negative effect of BA and significantly positive effect of BMC on the biomechanical competence (compressive stress, r²= 0.67, P < 0.0001; failure load, r²= 0.75, P < 0.0001). However, the stored strain energy was only related to the BMC (r²= 0.35, P < 0.0001). The contributory effects of BMC and BA on the biomechanical competence were not equal. The effects of BMC was larger than BA in determining the failure load and stored strain energy, whereas the reverse was found for the compressive stress. Using the log-transformed parameters as the regressors resulted in similar results. These results suggested the differential effects of BA and BMC in determining the biomechanical competence of vertebral bodies. We recommend the use of both parameters instead of BMD alone for evaluation of the vertebral biomechanical competence. Received: 26 June 1997 / Accepted: 8 January 1998     

Mechanical strength of bone in canine osteoporosis model: Relationship between bone mineral content and bone fragility

The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between bone mineral content (BMC) and mechanical strength in beagle dog models, and to find whether the mechanical strength changed with changes in BMC. We used 17 beagle dogs to create an experimental osteoporotic model, dividing them into six groups, based on age and experimental period. Presence and absence of ovariectomy (OVX); and calcium content of the diet. BMC was determined by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography in the lumbar vertebrae, and the mechanical strength of cancellous bone harvested from the lumbar vertebral body and femoral neck was measured. OVX alone did not affect either BMC or mechanical strength. However, when the dogs were ovariectomized, and then given a reduced calcium diet, the mechanical strength of the femoral neck decreased in parallel with the cortical BMC of the lumbar vertebrae. The mechanical strength of the vertebral cancellous bone was not decreased when the BMC was reduced by 20%, but was decreased when BMC was reduced by 30%.     

Relative contribution of vertebral body and posterior arch in female and male lumbar spine peak bone mass

Peak bone mass (PBM) is an important reference value in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. It is usually established by determining the areal bone mineral density (BMD in g/cm²) for a given site of the skeleton in young healthy adults. This measurement takes into account both the thickness and the integrated mineral density of the bone scanned. It should therefore be a major determinant of the resistance to mechanical stress. However, in lumbar spine the mean BMD as determined by dual-energy either isotopic or X-ray (DXA) absorptiometry in antero-posterior (ap) view was repeatedly found not to be different between male and female young healthy adults despite the greater volume of lumbar vertebral bodies in males. A greater contribution of the posterior vertebral arch to areal BMD-ap in females than in males could account for such an apparent discrepancy. In order to clarify this issue we have determined in 65 (32 male and 33 female) young healthy adults aged 20–35 years the relative contribution of the vertebral body (VB) and posterior vertebral arch (VA) to BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of L2–3 measured by both antero-posterior and lateral (lat) scanning using DXA. In young healthy adults mean BMC in antero-posterior view was found not to be significantly different from the total BMC determined by lateral scanning including both VB and VA. This allowed us then to calculate the VA BMC by substracting VB BMC-lat from BMC-ap. The results indicated that the mean value for males was significantly greater than that for females for BMC-ap (male/female ratio (mean±SEM): 1.16±0.05,p<0.01), BMC-lat (1.38±0.07,p<0.001) and VB BMD-lat (1.16±0.04,p<0.001). In sharp contrast, no sex difference was found in BMD-ap (male/female ratio: 0.99±0.03) and VA BMC (male/female ratio: 0.97±0.06). VA BMC represented 44% and 53% (p<0.001) of BMC-ap in males and females, respectively. Furthermore, in neither sex was any correlation between VA BMC and VB BMC found. In summary, this study indicates that the relative contribution of the posterior vertebral arch to the bone mineral content of L2–3 is significantly smaller in males than in females. This difference could partly explain the absence of a sex difference in areal BMD as measured in antero-posterior view. In agreement with lumbar anthropomorphometric data this study further shows that the sex difference in vertebral body size, an important component in mechanical resistance, is expressed when areal BMD is measured in lateral but not in antero-posterior scanning. Finally, the data analysis underlines the quantitative importance of the vertebral arch in the value of areal BMD as measured by DXA in the classical antero-posterior view, and demonstrates the absence of a significant quantitative relationship between the bone mineral content of the vertebral body and that of the posterior vertebral arch.     

Subregional DXA-Derived Vertebral Bone Mineral Measures are Stronger Predictors of Failure Load in Specimens with Lower Areal Bone Mineral Density,Compared to Those with Higher Areal Bone Mineral Density

Measurement of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in intravertebral subregions may increase the diagnostic sensitivity of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived parameters for vertebral fragility. This study investigated whether DXA-derived bone parameters in vertebral subregions were better predictors of vertebral bone strength in specimens with low aBMD, compared to those with higher aBMD. Twenty-five lumbar vertebrae (15 embalmed and 10 fresh-frozen) were scanned with posteroanterior- (PA) and lateral-projection DXA, and then mechanically tested in compression to ultimate failure. Whole-vertebral aBMD and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured from the PA- and lateral-projection scans and within 6 intravertebral subregions. Multivariate regression was used to predict ultimate failure load by BMC, adjusted for vertebral size and specimen fixation status across the whole specimen set, and when subgrouped into specimens with low aBMD and high aBMD. Adjusted BMC explained a substantial proportion of variance in ultimate vertebral load, when measured over the whole vertebral area in lateral projection (adjusted R ² 0.84) and across the six subregions (ROIs 2–7) (adjusted R ² range 0.58–0.78). The association between adjusted BMC, either measured subregionally or across the whole vertebral area, and vertebral failure load, was increased for the subgroup of specimens with identified ‘low aBMD’, compared to those with ‘high aBMD’, particularly in the anterior subregion where the adjusted R ² differed by 0.44. The relative contribution of BMC measured in vertebral subregions to ultimate failure load is greater among specimens with lower aBMD, compared to those with higher aBMD, particularly in the anterior subregion of the vertebral body.     

Evaluation of vertebral volumetric vs. areal bone mineral density during growth

Bone mineral “density” (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) does not represent the volumetric density (grams per cubic centimeter), but rather the areal density (grams per square centimeter). This distinction is important during growth. The purpose of this study was to measure vertebral dimensions in cadavers of young pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina), and to derive equations to predict the volumetric bone density from noninvasive measurements. We measured the areal bone density by DEXA, vertebral volume by underwater weighing, mineral content by ashing, dimensions of lumbar vertebrae by calipers, and dimensions of vertebrae by radiography. Somatometric measurements of the female lumbar vertebral bodies showed that the shape changed during growth. The bone mineral content from the densitometer correlated significantly with the ash weight (r = 0.99, error 8.7%). The correlation coefficient between the volumetric bone mineral density and areal BMD measurement was significant (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001) with a 9.5% error; this improved significantly to 0.82 (7.2% error) when the BMD was divided by the vertebral depth from the radiograph. Areal BMD showed a strong correlation with age (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001), with an average increase of 7.4%/year. In contrast, volumetric mineral density showed a weak relationship with age (r = 0.43, p < 0.01), for an average increase of 1.5%/year. When studying bone mineral density during growth, the differences between volumetric and areal bone mineral density should be taken into consideration. (     

Relationship between kyphosis, scoliosis, and osteoporosis in the elderly population

In 56 valid subjects 60 years old or more, bone mineral content (BMC) of the second, third, and fourth lumbar vertebrae and of femoral neck was measured by dual-photon absorptiometry. Dorsal kyphosis and lumbar and dorso-lumbar scoliosis were determined from radiographs using the Cobb methods. Kyphosis was positively correlated with low BMC but not with scoliosis. Scoliosis was positively correlated with femoral neck BMC but not with vertebral BMC.     

Failure load of thoracic vertebrae correlates with lumbar bone mineral density measured by DXA

Fractures of the thoracic spine account for a large portion of vertebral fractures in the elderly, yet noninvasive measurements of bone mineral properties are limited to the L2–L4 vertebral bodies. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether bone mineral properties of the umbar spine correlate with the failure properties of thoracic ertebrae. Cadaveric lumbar segments were scanned using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) from both the latcrol and anteroposterior projections. Three-body segments L1–L3 and T10–T12 were then compressed to create crush tractures in the L2 and T11 vertebral bodies, and linear corelation analyses were performed to compare each DXA measure with the failure properties of L2 and T11. Lumbar BMD from the lateral view correlated significantly with T11 altimate load (r=0.94, P<0.001), as did lumbar BMD from the anteroposterior projection (r=0.83, P=0.001). Significant correlations were also found between both lumbar BMD and BMC and the stiffness and energy to failure of I'll. Furthermore, BMD and BMC measured at L2 correlated significantly with L2 ultimate load, stiffness, and energy to failure. We conclude that bone mineral properties measured at the lumbar spine provide a valid assessment of the compressive strength of both thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Lumbar BMD may therefore be used to derive an index for the prediction of thoracolumbar fractures to aid in the early intervention of vertebral fractures.Portions of this work were presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society and appeared in abstract form in the conference proceedings.     

Nonprogression of vertebral area or bone mineral content on DXA does not predict compression fractures.

The 2003 International Society for Clinical Densitometry consensus guidelines recommend exclusion of vertebral bodies for lack of increase in bone area (BA) or bone mineral content (BMC), or an unusual T-score discrepancy (>1 standard deviation [SD]) between adjacent vertebrae. It is unclear how often nonprogression in BA, BMC, and T-score discrepancies predicts abnormal vertebral morphology, such as compression fractures. We prospectively studied 101 individuals sent for clinical dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning, including 20.8% males and 79.2% females. The population was 85% Caucasian, 13% African-American, and 3% Hispanic. The mean age was 65.6 yr; 20.2% were currently on steroids and 22.7% were taking drugs for osteoporosis. All subjects underwent the usual posteroanterior (PA) spine DXA scan PA and lateral vertebral fracture analysis (VFA). The presence of vertebral compression fractures and/or scoliosis of the lumbar spine by VFA were correlated with nonprogression of area or BMC, and/or a difference of >1 SD in T-scores using Fisher's exact test. By VFA, we detected 22 lumbar compression fractures among 101 subjects, which was 16% of the population. Nonprogression of BA, BMC, and T-score discrepancy were not statistically associated with the presence of vertebral compression fracture as assessed by VFA. Thirty percent of subjects had lumbar spine scoliosis. The presence of scoliosis was significantly related to a T-score discrepancy at L1-L4.     

Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT

Significant relationships exist between areal bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone strength. However, the predictive validity of BMD for osteoporotic vertebral fractures remains suboptimal. The diagnostic sensitivity of DXA in the lumbar spine may be improved by assessing BMD from lateral-projection scans, as these might better approximate the objective of measuring the trabecular-rich bone in the vertebral body, compared to the commonly-used posterior-anterior (PA) projections. Nowadays, X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) allows non-destructive three-dimensional structural characterization of entire bone segments at high resolution. In this study, human lumbar cadaver spines were examined ex situ by DXA in lateral and PA projections, as well as by μCT, with the aims (1) to investigate the ability of bone quantity measurements obtained by DXA in the lateral projection and in the PA projection, to predict variations in bone quantity measurements obtained by μCT, and (2) to assess their respective capabilities to predict whole vertebral body strength, determined experimentally. Human cadaver spines were scanned by DXA in PA projections and lateral projections. Bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD for L2 and L3 vertebrae were determined. The L2 and L3 vertebrae were then dissected and entirely scanned by μCT. Total bone volume (BV(tot)=cortical+trabecular), trabecular bone volume (BV), and trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were calculated over the entire vertebrae. The vertebral bodies were then mechanically tested to failure in compression, to determine ultimate load. The variables BV(tot), BV, and BV/TV measured by μCT were better predicted by BMC and BMD measured by lateral-projection DXA, with higher R(2) values and smaller standard errors of the estimate (R(2)=0.65-0.90, SEE=11%-18%), compared to PA-projection DXA (R(2)=0.33-0.53, SEE=22%-34%). The best predictors of ultimate load were BV(tot) and BV assessed by μCT (R(2)=0.88 and R(2)=0.81, respectively), and BMC and BMD from lateral-projection DXA (R(2)=0.82 and R(2)=0.70, respectively). Conversely, BMC and BMD from PA-projection DXA were lower predictors of ultimate load (R(2)=0.49 and R(2)=0.37, respectively). This ex vivo study highlights greater capabilities of lateral-projection DXA to predict variations in vertebral body bone quantity as measured by μCT, and to predict vertebral strength as assessed experimentally, compared to PA-projection DXA. This provides basis for further exploring the clinical application of lateral-projection DXA analysis.     

Effects of gender and age differences on the distribution of bone content in the third lumbar vertebra

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study on the distribution of bone mineral content in the third lumbar vertebrae. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of age and gender on the distribution of bone mineral content in the third lumbar vertebrae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compression fractures occur mainly at the vertebral body. Variations in the distribution of bone mass in a vertebra, if undefined, may bias the ability of the acquired bone mineral density values, which was usually measured posteroanteriorly, to predict the risk of fractures. METHODS: The bone mineral content of the whole L3, including the L3 vertebral body and the posterior segment, was measured using a lateral approach with a dual energy radiograph absorptiometer on 177 healthy Taiwanese adults including 65 men and 55 premenopausal and 57 postmenopausal women. RESULTS: The proportion of bone mineral content in the vertebral body was significantly lower in premenopausal women than in age-matched men (39.1 +/- 0.9% vs. 50.0 +/- 1.7%, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, whereas postmenopausal women showed a decreased proportion of bone mineral content in the vertebral body with increased age (about -0.0022 per year, P = 0.0001), premenopausal women and men showed a sustained proportion. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of bone mineral content distributed in the body of L3 vertebrae was lower in women than in men. The discrepancy of this parameter between the genders was even larger with increased ages.     

间歇皮下注射人甲状旁腺激素不同片段(hFTH1-34及 hFTH1-84)对去卵巢大鼠股骨及腰椎骨量的影响

目的 比较间歇皮下注射人甲状旁腺激素不同片段（hPTH1-34)及（hPTH1-84)对完整雌性（Non-OVX)大鼠和去卵巢（OVX）大鼠股骨及腰椎1－4骨矿物含量（BMC）和骨密度（BMD）的影响。方法 Wistar雌性大鼠176只，分为hPTH1-34和hPTH1-84两大组（各80只及96只），每大组及各自分4组（每组各20只或24只），分别为：两组安慰剂组（未切卵巢及切卵巢）用安慰剂（PBS）进行皮下注射，每周3次，共2周；两组治疗组（未切卵巢及切卵巢）用hPTH1-34或hPTH1-84，皮下注射，每周3次，共2周。结果 1．卵巢切除术后3个月大鼠股骨及腰椎1－4BMC和BMD明显下降；2．两种片段的甲状旁腺激素（hPTH1-34及pPTH1-84)间歇注射均能使Non-OVX大鼠和OVX大鼠股骨及腰椎1－4BMC和BMD较相应对照组明显升高；且腰椎1－4较股骨的BMC和BMD升高更明显；3．OVX大鼠治疗后股骨与腰椎1－4BMC和BMD的升高率较Non-OVX大鼠更明显；OVX大鼠在治疗后股骨及腰椎骨量能恢复到去卵巢前水平；4．hPTH1-34较hPTH1-84更明显的使完整大鼠和OVX大鼠股骨BMC和BMD升高。结论 间歇皮下注射人甲状旁腺激素对大鼠股骨及腰椎骨量均有增高作用，尤其对腰椎的骨量以及对去卵巢大鼠骨量升高作用更明显；hPTH1-34片段对大鼠股骨骨量的增高作用强于hPTH1-84片段。     

绝经后妇女骨质疏松性椎体骨折与腰椎骨密度的关系

目的探讨绝经后妇女骨质疏松性椎体骨折与腰椎骨密度的关系。方法选择骨质疏松性椎体骨折的绝经后妇女23例为骨折组,无椎体骨折的25例绝经后骨质疏松妇女为对照组。两组的年龄、绝经年限、身高、体重、体重指数差异无显著性,均行胸腰椎正侧位X线摄片。用双能X线吸收仪（DXA）测量的腰椎（L2-4）前后位骨密度（BMD）、骨矿含量（BMC）和T值。结果骨折组BMD、BMC和T值均低于对照组（P〈0.01）。结论腰椎BMD降低与绝经后妇女的骨质疏松性椎体骨折相关。绝经后骨质疏松妇女应重视BMD变化,预防椎体骨折的发生。     

腰椎终板骨折特点及相关因素的实验研究

目的 探讨腰椎椎体终板压迫骨折的特点及其影响因素。方法 19个尸体标本的腰椎运动节段（FSU）,根据X线检查来确定椎间盘的退变分级,在双能X线吸收仪器（DEXA）上测量椎体和椎体终板的骨密度（BMD）和骨矿含量（BMC）,然后分别承受过度负荷导致终板骨折,根据力-位移曲线来确定终板骨折和终板的极限负荷（FL）。终板骨折后,运动节段解剖为单独的椎体,观察终板骨折情况。结果 19个FSU标本中,16个发生肉眼可见的终板骨折,骨折仅仅发生在下位椎体的上终板,比率为84．2％,骨折均位于终板的中央部分或前部,表现为星形放射状、阶梯状、局部突入型等;终板的FL与椎体及终板的BMD、BMC呈正相关。同一个椎体内,上终板的BMD、BMC显著低于下终板,而同一个椎间盘周围,上终板的BMD高于下终板者,BMC却无差异。结论终板压迫骨折易发生于椎体的上终板;不同退变程度椎间盘邻近终板骨折的特点不同,但这种骨折在X线片上很难显现,终板的极限负荷与椎体终板的BMD、BMC呈正相关。     

Seasonal variation of lumbar spine bone mineral content in normal women

The seasonal influence on lumbar spine bone mineral was evaluated in a prospective study of 26 normal women aged 19-66 years. Bone mineral content of the second, third, and fourth lumbar vertebrae (lumbar BMC) was determined every 3 months during 1 year by using dual-photon (153Gd) absorptiometry. Lumbar BMC was, on an average (mean +/- SE), 0.86 +/- 0.27 arbitrary units or 1.7 +/- 0.5% higher in July to September than in January to March (P less than 0.005), when other sources of variation were eliminated. It is hypothesized that the seasonal variation in lumbar spine bone mineral reflects differences of the mechanical loading on the vertebrae. The interpretation of longitudinal studies of lumbar BMC may be erroneous if the seasonal variations in bone mineral are not considered.     

Vertebral deformity in men.

Vertebral fracture is the most prevalent manifestation of osteoporosis in women, but there is very little information concerning vertebral fracture in men. These studies begin to determine the prevalence, radiographic character, and relationship to bone mineral density of vertebral deformity in men. A group of 144 white men aged 34-94 years (83% between 50 and 80 years) were studied. Thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were obtained using standardized techniques, and morphometric measures of vertebrae (T6-L5) were obtained using a computerized digitization pad. Vertebral deformities (wedge, midbody, and crush) were identified using several criteria. In addition, a skeletal radiologist independently identified vertebral deformities, as well as vertebrae affected by epiphysitis (Scheuermann's disease), using classic radiographic criteria. Bone mineral density was measured at lumbar spine and proximal femoral sites using dual-photon absorptiometry. The prevalence of vertebral deformity was related to the criteria used for their identification. Utilizing vertebral-specific criteria (anterior/posterior or midbody/posterior vertebral height more than 3 SD below vertebral specific mean), 10% of subjects had vertebral deformity. Wedge deformity occurred primarily in thoracic vertebrae and were more common than midbody deformity, which occurred more commonly in lumbar vertebrae. Crush deformities were not observed. Evidence of vertebral epiphysitis was present in 9% of subjects but was not responsible for vertebral deformity sufficient to be falsely identified using the more than -3 SD criterion. Bone mineral density in subjects with vertebral deformity was clearly reduced at both vertebral (p = 0.003) and proximal femoral (p = 0.002) measurements sites. The number of vertebral deformities was negatively correlated with vertebral bone mineral density.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Correlation between densitometric and hystomorphometric values in isolated vertebrae of Sprague-Dawley rats

Summary The study of bone mass in experimental animals usually requires invasive techniques. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) may be an alternative as a non-invasive method (1). Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of 62 vertebrae of Sprague Dawley rats (SDr) measured by DEXA densitometry were compared with histomorphometric bone volume measurements, and a statistically significant correlation was found (r=0.79 and 0.75, respectively, p<0.001). In conclusion, DEXA is an accurate and feasible technique for the study of trabecular bone mass in SDr.     

The amount of bone mineral and Schmorl's nodes in lumbar vertebrae

The bone mineral areal content and the ultimate compressive strength were determined in 109 lumbar vertebrae from 36 subjects. The bone mineral areal content was related to the number, shape, and localization of the Schmorl's nodes detected in the x-rayed and sectioned vertebral bodies. One type of node, irregular in shape and localization, occurred only in the vertebrae with low bone mineral areal content values and thus in vertebrae with relatively low compressive strength. A second type of Schmorl's nodes, regular in shape and localization, did not reflect any general weakness of the vertebral bodies.     

体重对成年女性骨矿含量及其标化的影响研究

目的分析不同体重组人群[小体重组(<45 kg)、标准体重组(45~60 kg)、大体重组(>60 kg)]的骨矿含量结果,探索体重对骨矿含量及其标化的影响。方法纳入290例50~80岁绝经后女性,按体重大小分为大体重组、标准体重组、小体重组。通对不同体重组人群的腰椎L_1~4、股骨的骨矿含量及骨密度进行测量,并对测量结果进行比较分析。同时将年龄、体重作为应变量,腰椎或股骨颈骨矿含量作为自变量,进行多重线性回归分析。结果低体重组的腰椎或股骨颈骨密度T值、骨矿含量均明显低于标准体重组和高体重组人群。随着年龄增长,L_1~4及股骨颈骨矿含量均下降,年龄每升高1岁,L_1~4骨矿含量下降0.364 g、股骨颈骨矿含量下降0.031 g;随着体重增长,L_1~4及股骨颈骨矿含量均升高,体重每增长1 kg,L_1~4骨矿含量升高0.548 g、股骨颈骨矿含量升高0.025 g。结论成年女性的体重与骨矿含量显著正相关,因此,体重是骨矿含量标化的重要指标之一,可以避免骨质疏松的漏误诊。     

Anteroposterior and lateral spinal DXA for the assessment of vertebral body strength: Comparison with hip and forearm measurement

Spinal bone mineral density (BMD) is traditionally measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the anteroposterior (AP) projection which includes both the vertebral body and the posterior elements in the measurement. The posterior elements, however, contribute little to the compressive strength of the spine. It has therefore been suggested that spinal BMD measured in the lateral projection, including only the vertebral body in the measurement, might be more appropriate for the prediction of fracture risk. To date little clinical evidence has been presented to support this assumption. To address the issue, we measured vertebral, hip and forearm BMD in situ in 14 human cadavers and remeasured BMD in vitro in excised vertebrae. Lateral spinal measurements were performed in the decubitus position. Fracture force and other bio-mechanical measures were determined for 32 vertebrae in a mechanical testing machine and compared with BMD values in situ and in vitro. Correlations of BMD with vertebral fracture force werer=0.48/0.51 (in situ/in vitro) for the AP spinal measurements,r=0.45/0.71 (in situ/in vitro) for the lateral spinal measurements, andr=0.64 andr=0.53 for total hip and forearm measurements in situ, respectively. Thus, despite an apparent diagnostic advantage in vitro, lateral spinal BMD measurement was not superior to AP measurement when performed in situ. This observation corresponds well with previous clinical findings and is probably due to the larger accuracy error in the lateral than in the AP projection resulting from a lower ratio of bone to soft tissue. The high correlation between hip BMD and vertebral fracture force suggests that hip measurement may prove as useful for vertebral fracture risk assessment as spinal measurement in any projection, especially in the elderly with a high prevalence of degenerative changes in the spine.