Recovery after anaesthesia for pulmonary surgery: desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane

We have studied maintenance and recovery profiles after general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane and isoflurane in 100 patients undergoing pulmonary surgery. End-tidal concentrations of anaesthetic required to maintain mean arterial pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline values were 1.4 +/- 0.6% for sevoflurane, 3.4 +/- 0.9% for desflurane and 0.7 +/- 0.3% for isoflurane. The three anaesthetics had comparable haemodynamic effects and arterial oxygenation during one- lung ventilation. Emergence was twice as fast with desflurane than with sevoflurane or isoflurane (mean times to extubation: 8.9 (SD 5.0) min, 18.0 (17.0) min and 16.2 (11.0) min for desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane, respectively). Early recovery (Aldrete score, cognitive and psychomotor functions) was also more rapid after desflurane. In pulmonary surgery, desflurane, but not sevoflurane, allowed more rapid emergence and earlier recovery than isoflurane.      

Retracted: Do patients profit from physostigmine in recovery from desflurane anaesthesia?

BACKGROUND: Physostigmine is the drug of choice in the central anticholinergic syndrome, but has also been used in post-operative mental derangement secondary to sedatives and volatile anaesthetics. The aim of this double-blind, randomized, prospective study was to determine whether physostigmine alters recovery after desflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing urologic or surgical procedures were enrolled to receive either NaCl 0.9% (n = 50) or 2 mg of physostigmine (n = 50) at the end of general anaesthesia with propofol, fentanyl, cisatracurium and desflurane. Times to extubation, stating name, birthday and place of residence, and obeying commands such as eye opening and hand squeezing were noted. Haemodynamics, Aldrete and pain scores, the analgesic requirements, and any adverse side-effects were documented until the 1st post-operative day. RESULTS: Demographic, peri-operative data including duration of anaesthesia, surgery and postanaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay, and consumption of anaesthetics were comparable in both groups. No significant difference between the groups was found for extubation time or other emergence parameters. Patients undergoing anaesthesia >150 min showed after receiving physostigmine significantly (P < 0.05) faster spontaneous breathing (2.6 +/- 3.1 vs. placebo 5.0 +/- 4.2 min) and extubation time (6.2 +/- 3.7 vs. placebo 8.8 +/- 5.0 min). Women showed significantly shorter extubation times (5.5 +/- 3.4 min) and eye opening (5.5 +/- 2.6 min) with physostigmine than placebo (7.7 +/- 4.5 and 7.8 +/- 4.0 min). The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly higher after physostigmine than placebo, whereas shivering occurred more often after placebo. CONCLUSION: Physostigmine does not alter desflurane-based anaesthesia compared with placebo. An option is to use physostigmine in patients with a duration of anaesthesia >150 min who profit in earlier return to spontaneous breathing and shorter extubation time.     

Early recovery, cognitive function and costs of a desflurane inhalational vs. a total intravenous anaesthesia regimen in long-term surgery

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare time of recovery, return of cognitive function, post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay and costs of a propofol/remifentanil (TIVA) with a desflurane/fentanyl-based anaesthesia (desflurane group) in surgical procedures lasting more than 150 min. METHODS: Forty-nine patients undergoing elective abdominal prostatectomy were allocated randomly to receive bispectal index (BIS)-controlled desflurane/fentanyl (n=24) or propofol/remifentanil (n=25). Awakening, clinical recovery, direct drug acquisition and post-operative pain treatment were documented. Cognitive skills were tested using the Mini-Mental Status (MMST) test. RESULTS: Extubation was significantly faster with desflurane (6.9+/-3.5 min) than with TIVA (11.2+/-4.0 min) as well as times for stating name and date of birth (desflurane: 6.1+/-3.9 and 6.6+/-4.0 min; TIVA: 12.4+/-11.5 min and 13.4+/-11.3 min). There were no significant differences in PACU discharge times or MMS scores between the groups. Significantly more patients suffered post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the desflurane (33% vs. 0%) than the TIVA group. Overall costs were significantly higher in the TIVA (58.8+/-11.6 euro) than in the desflurane group (35.0+/-5.7 euro). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing prolonged surgical procedures showed a faster early recovery after desflurane/fentanyl than using TIVA, whereas stay in the PACU and recovery of cognitive function were similar in both groups. Costs of a TIVA regimen were significantly higher than using a desflurane-based anaesthesia technique.     

Recovery profile after desflurane-nitrous oxide versus isoflurane-nitrous oxide in outpatients

Thirty-eight healthy outpatients undergoing elective surgical procedures lasting 1-3 h were randomly assigned to receive either desflurane 3% (approximately 0.5 MAC) or isoflurane 0.6% (approximately 0.5 MAC) for maintenance of general anesthesia with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen after a standardized induction sequence consisting of fentanyl 3 micrograms.kg-1, thiopental 4 mg.kg-1, and succinylcholine 1-1.5 mg.kg-1, intravenously. Although anesthetic conditions were similar during operations in the two treatment groups, significant differences were noted in the recovery profiles as measured by elimination kinetics, psychometric testing, and visual analog scales (to assess subjective feelings). The time required for the end-tidal concentration to decrease by 50% was 2.5 +/- 0.8 min for desflurane vs. 9.5 +/- 3.4 min for isoflurane (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]). Times to awakening and ability to follow simple commands were significantly shorter after desflurane than after isoflurane (5.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 10.2 +/- 7.7 min 6.5 +/- 2.3 min vs. 11.1 +/- 7.9 min, respectively). Postoperatively, patients who received desflurane exhibited less impairment of cognitive function (as measured using the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test) than did those who received isoflurane. Furthermore, visual analog scores indicated that patients receiving desflurane experienced significantly less discomfort (pain), drowsiness, fatigue, clumsiness, and confusion in the early postoperative period. We conclude that desflurane may offer clinical advantages over isoflurane when used for maintenance of anesthesia during outpatient surgical procedures.     

Recovery profile and side effects of remifentanil-based anaesthesia with desflurane or propofol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide (N2O) has been suggested to contribute to bowel distension, resulting in worsened operating conditions for laparoscopic surgery, and to increase incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Therefore, our objective was to assess the feasibility of two remifentanil-based anaesthetic regimens free from N2O with special regard to recovery profile, postoperative analgesic demand and side effects in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Fifty patients (ASA I-II, 23-65 yr) were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil-based anaesthesia in conjunction with propofol (group R/P) or desflurane (group R/D). After standardised induction of anaesthesia, analgesia was continued with remifentanil in all patients. For maintenance of hypnosis, propofol or desflurane were used in concentrations to ensure loss of consciousness, lack of awareness, and maintenance of heart rate and blood pressure within +/- 25% of initial values. At the end of surgery all anaesthetics were discontinued without tapering and early emergence and recovery were recorded. Pain scores were assessed by using a visual analogue scale. Patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. piritramide was used for treatment of postoperative pain and recorded for 90 min in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). In addition, side effects were noted. RESULTS: Early emergence from anaesthesia did not differ between the groups. In group R/P, time to eye opening, spontaneous respiration and extubation was 4.4 +/- 2.9 min, 5.2 +/- 3.4 min and 5.5 +/- 3.3 min respectively, compared with 4.7 +/- 2.7 min, 5.3 +/- 2.4 min and 5.7 +/- 2.5 min in group R/D. While pain scores did not differ between both groups on admission to the PACU, patients receiving desflurane required more i.v. piritramide as compared to those receiving propofol, 22.0 +/- 6.5 mg and 17.9 +/- 7.0 mg, respectively (P<0.05). Nausea was less frequent after propofol (16% vs. 48%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, remifentanil-based anaesthetic regimens in conjunction with propofol or desflurane are suitable and allow for rapid recovery from anaesthesia. However, the use of propofol results in less postoperative analgesic consumption and nausea as compared to desflurane.     

Narcotrend stages and end-tidal desflurane concentrations. An investigation during recovery from desflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia

OBJECITVE: As indicated by the manufacturer the EEG monitor Narcotrend trade mark (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt) can be used to analyse EEG effects of volatile anaesthetics, however, published data are missing. This study evaluated the emergence from a desflurane/remifentanil anaesthetic and was designed to investigate the relationship between Narcotrend stages (version 2.0 AF) and end-tidal desflurane concentrations and to identify the pattern of changes of the Narcotrend stages during recovery. METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for orthopaedic surgery were premedicated with 0.15 mg/kg diazepam orally in the evening and on the morning before surgery. Narcotrend EEG electrodes were positioned on the patient's forehead as recommended by the manufacturer. For induction of anaesthesia, remifentanil was infused at 0.4 microgram/kg/min and propofol 2 mg/kg was given for hypnosis. After neuromuscular blockade and orotracheal intubation, remifentanil was reduced to 0.2 microgram/kg/min, and desflurane in O(2)/air was added according to clinical needs. After termination of surgery, administration of anaesthetics was discontinued and simultaneously, the fresh gas flow was increased to 10 l/min of O(2) while the respirator pattern was left unchanged. Narcotrend stages and end-tidal desflurane concentrations were recorded as data pairs at intervals of 1 min during emergence from anaesthesia; data evaluation included the last 7 min before extubation. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (mean age +/-SD 44.4+/-13.0 years) were studied and 400 data pairs were obtained. A decreasing depth of anaesthesia as indicated by the Narcotrend was associated with significantly lower end-tidal desflurane concentrations: for E (general anaesthesia with deep hypnosis) 3.6+/-1.0 vol%, for D (general anaesthesia) 1.7+/-0.8 vol%, for C (light anaesthesia) 0.7+/-0.3 vol% and for A and B (awake or sedated) 0.5 vol%. A reduction of end-tidal desflurane concentrations was accompanied by a shift of Narcotrend stages from C/D/E to A/B/C. CONCLUSION: During emergence from desflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia, a reduction of end-tidal desflurane concentrations was detected by the EEG monitor Narcotrend and classified as a typical change of distribution of Narcotrend stages.     

The effect of anesthetic technique on recovery from neuromuscular blockade with cisatracurium

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of four anesthetic techniques on recovery after a single dose of 0.2 mg/kg of cisatracurium. PATIENTS AND METHOD: After giving informed consent, 96 patients of both sexes, ASA I-III, were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol O2-N2O (FiO2 40%) after which the patients were randomly assigned to four groups according to maintenance technique: propofol by infusion, sevoflurane, desflurane or isoflurane at 1.3 MAC. Neuromuscular block was monitored (electromyographic recording of the pollicis adductor). Variables recorded were time of maximum block, duration of action of 1% and 25%, and recovery indices at T0-TR75 andT25%-T75%. ANOVA was performed ( = 0.05 and beta = 0.1). RESULTS: The groups were homogeneous. Time until recovery of 25% of baseline amplitude of the first response to a train of four (TOF) (T1) was longer in the desflurane group (68.4 +/- 11.1 min) than in the propofol group (60.2 +/- 9.4 min; p < 0.05). Time until recovery of 75% of the TOF-ratio was longer in the sevoflurane (96.8 +/- 13.1 min), desflurane (101.5 +/- 14.4 min) and isoflurane (94.1 +/- 13.9 min) groups than in the propofol group (83.7 +/- 1.3 min) (p < 0.0001).Times until recovery of T1 up to 1% were not statistically different: 45.8 +/- 10.7 (propofol), 50.6 +/- 11.0 (sevoflurane), 51.3 +/- 11.5 (desflurane) and 46.5 +/- 11.2 min (isoflurane). The 25% - 75% recovery index was also similar at 19.0 +/- 9.3 (propofol), 20.0 +/- 5.1 (sevoflurane), 25.7 +/- 12.4 (desflurane) and 20.9 +/- 7.9 (isoflurane). CONCLUSIONS: The inhaled anesthetics studied prolong the duration of clinical effect of cisatracurium more than does propofol.     

Recovery of older patients undergoing ambulatory anaesthesia with isoflurane or sevoflurane

BACKGROUND: Delayed recovery of cognitive function is a well-recognized phenomenon in older patients. The potential for the volatile anaesthetic used to contribute to alterations in postoperative cognitive function in older patients following minor surgical procedures has not been determined. We compared emergence from isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia in older surgical patients undergoing urological procedures of short duration. METHODS: Seventy-one patients, 60 yr of age or older, undergoing anaesthesia expected to last less than 60 min for ambulatory surgery, were randomly assigned to receive isoflurane or sevoflurane. A standardized anaesthetic protocol was used, with intravenous fentanyl 1 microg kg(-1) and propofol 1.5-2.0 mg kg(-1) administered to induce anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained with either sevoflurane or isoflurane in 65% nitrous oxide and oxygen. Early and intermediate recovery times were recorded. The Mini Mental State Examination and digit repetition forwards and backwards were administered at baseline, and at 1, 3 and 6 h postoperatively, to assess cognitive function. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in (sevoflurane vs. isoflurane, mean +/- standard error of the mean) times to removal of the laryngeal mask airway (7.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 7.1 +/- 0.4 min), verbal response time (10.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 9.9 +/- 0.7 min) and orientation (12.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 12.1 +/- 0.7 min). Intermediate recovery, as measured by time to readiness for discharge from the post anaesthesia care unit (44.9 +/- 1.5 vs. 44.3 +/- 1.5 min), was similar in the two groups. Postoperative indices of cognitive function and attention were comparably reduced at 1 h, but returned to baseline in both groups at 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia resulted in similar clinical and neurocognitive recovery profiles in older patients undergoing ambulatory surgical procedures of short duration.     

Mivacurium infusion requirement and spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular transmission in children anaesthetized with nitrous oxide and fentanyl,halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane

BACKGROUND: Forty children, aged 3-11 years, ASA I or II, were allocated at random to receive N2O/O2-fentanyl or 1 MAC halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane-N2O/O2 anaesthesia. Mivacurium was used for muscle relaxation. METHODS: Electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation, 2 Hz for 2 s, applied to the ulnar nerve at 10-s intervals was recorded using the Relaxograph (Datex, Helsinki, Finland). An intubating dose of mivacurium, 0.2 mg.kg-1 was given, and when T1 returned to 5%, muscle relaxation was maintained by continuous infusion of mivacurium, adjusted manually to maintain a stable 90-99% block. RESULTS: Halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane groups had lower infusion requirements for mivacurium than the N2O-fentanyl group (P=0.000083). Mivacurium requirement was 18.8 +/- 6.8, 10.8 +/- 4.2, 6.9 +/- 3.9 and 9.6 +/- 5.6 microg.kg-1.min-1 for children receiving N2O/O2-fentanyl, halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous recovery from T1=10% to TOF ratio=0.7 was insignificantly prolonged from 6.3 to 12.5 min in the fentanyl group to 7-16.5 min in children anaesthetized with inhalational anaesthetics.     

Reduction of the MAC of desflurane with fentanyl.

Opioids are known to affect the MAC of inhalational anesthetics. We have determined the interaction between fentanyl and desflurane, following a bolus injection of fentanyl at induction in 134 adult patients. Five groups of patients were studied. Four groups received desflurane or isoflurane in oxygen with either fentanyl 3 or 6 micrograms/kg and thiopental 2-5 mg/kg given as a bolus injection at the time of induction. An additional group received desflurane in oxygen alone. Groups were stratified by age. MAC determination, in response to the stimulus of skin incision, was made using the "up-down" method and logistic regression. The MAC desflurane in oxygen was 6.3% (5.3-7.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]). Fentanyl 3 micrograms/kg produced a fentanyl plasma concentration of 0.78 +/- 0.53 ng/ml at skin incision and resulted in a MAC for desflurane of 2.6% (2.0-3.2%, 95% CI) %. Fentanyl 6 micrograms/kg produced a fentanyl plasma concentration of 1.72 +/- 0.76 ng/ml at skin incision and resulted in a MAC for desflurane of 2.1% (1.5-2.6%, 95% CI). To compare recovery times to eye-opening and response to commands, patients were grouped according to the plasma fentanyl concentrations at the time of awaking. Recovery was faster in patients who received desflurane than in those who received isoflurane. The authors conclude that the MAC of desflurane is significantly reduced 25 min following a single dose of 3 micrograms/kg of fentanyl and that increasing the fentanyl dose to 6 micrograms/kg produces little further decrease in MAC. Desflurane is also associated with faster recovery from anesthesia than is isoflurane.     

Aufwachverhalten und kognitive Funktion nach Desfluran oder Isofluran

Desflurane is a new volatile anaesthetic with an extremely low blood/gas partition coefficient of 0.42. This should provide a rapid recovery from anaesthesia. Methods. We studied 100 adult patients, ASA class?I or II, undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery randomly assigned to anaesthesia with desflurane (n=50) or isoflurane (n=50) supplemented by nitrous oxide in oxygen. Clorazepat was given for premedication, fentanyl and thiopental for induction of anaesthesia, followed by maintenance with desflurane or isoflurane as clinically appropriate. Emergence from anaesthesia was measured as well as return of cognitive functions (extended Aldrete score, digit symbol substitution test, and visual analogue scales [VAS]). Results. While the demographic characteristics and administrated doses of fentanyl and thiopental were comparable, the recovery profiles in both groups were different. After discontinuation of the volatile anaesthetics, times to extubation and ability to follow simple commands were significantly shorter after desflurane than after isoflurane. Extended Aldrete scores, estimation of the patients' physical condition, results of the digit symbol substitution test, measuring cognitive functions, and rates of drowsiness and weakness on VAS showed better recovery with less impairment of cognitive function in the desflurane group than in isoflurane patients even 120?min after anaesthesia. VAS pain scores and doses of analgesic drugs given within the first 2 postoperative hours, however, showed no significant differences. Desflurane patients were also judged fit for discharge from the recovery room significantly faster. Conclusions. Our results demonstrate that desflurane anaesthesia, even when supplemented by premedication, intraoperative opioids, and nitrous oxide may offer clinical advantages over isoflurane as far as the post-anaesthetic recovery profile is concerned.     

Desflurane and isoflurane in surgical patients: comparison of emergence time

In order to examine the clinical potential of desflurane (difluoromethyl-1-fluoro-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl ether) in humans, a randomized, controlled study was designed to compare time of emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing elective surgery under desflurane anesthesia to that of patients under isoflurane anesthesia. Twenty-eight patients were randomly divided into four groups. Group 1 received isoflurane 0.65 MAC; group 2, desflurane 0.65 MAC; group 3, isoflurane 1.25 MAC; and group 4, desflurane 1.25 MAC. Anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental, and N2O 60% was added to the volatile agent. Mean anesthetic exposure times (min [mean +/- SD]) were 108 +/- 49 in group 1, 132 +/- 46 in group 2, 147 +/- 74 in group 3, and 166 +/- 71 in group 4, with no significant differences between groups. The times from discontinuation of anesthetic gases until patients opened their eyes and squeezed the investigator's hand in response to a command were averaged and recorded as "emergence time." Emergence time was significantly less with desflurane than with isoflurane given at the same MAC. Patients receiving isoflurane 0.65 MAC responded to commands 15.6 +/- 4.3 min after discontinuation of the anesthetic; patients in the desflurane 0.65 MAC group responded in 8.8 +/- 2.7 min (P less than 0.01). Emergence time for isoflurane 1.25 MAC was 30.0 +/- 11.0 min; for desflurane 1.25 MAC it was 16.1 +/- 6.0 min (P less than 0.05). Our results confirm that emergence from desflurane anesthesia is more rapid than from isoflurane.     

Fast-track eligibility of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic surgery procedures

Our primary objective was to assess the feasibility of geriatric patients (>65 yr) bypassing the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after ambulatory surgery. A secondary objective was to compare recovery profiles when using three different maintenance anesthetics. Ninety ASA physical status I--III consenting outpatients (>65 yr) undergoing short urologic procedures were randomly assigned to one of three anesthetic treatment groups. After a standardized induction with fentanyl and propofol, anesthesia was maintained with propofol (75-150 microg center dot kg(-1) center dot min(-1) IV), isoflurane (0.7%-1.2% end tidal), or desflurane (3%-6% end tidal), in combination with nitrous oxide 70% in oxygen. In all three groups, the primary anesthetic was titrated to maintain an electroencephalographic-bispectral index value of 60-65. Recovery times, postanesthesia recovery scores, and therapeutic interventions in the PACU were recorded. Although emergence times were similar in the three groups, the time to achieve a fast-track discharge score of 14 was significantly shorter in patients receiving desflurane compared with propofol and isoflurane (22 +/- 23 vs 33 +/- 25 and 44 +/- 36 min, respectively). On arrival in the PACU, a significantly larger percentage of patients receiving desflurane were judged to be fast-track eligible compared with those receiving either isoflurane and propofol (73% vs 43% and 44%, respectively). The number of therapeutic interventions in the PACU was also significantly larger in the Isoflurane group when compared with the Propofol and Desflurane groups (21 vs 11 and 7, respectively). In conclusion, use of desflurane for maintenance of anesthesia should facilitate PACU bypass ("fast-tracking") of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic procedures. IMPLICATIONS: Geriatric outpatients undergoing brief urologic procedures more rapidly achieve fast-tracking discharge criteria after desflurane (versus isoflurane and propofol) anesthesia. Use of isoflurane was also associated with an increased need for nursing interventions in the early recovery period compared with desflurane and propofol.     

Recovery after prolonged anaesthesia for acoustic neuroma surgery: desflurane versus isoflurane

In this study, 33 patients were randomly assigned to receive desflurane (D) or isoflurane (I) for acoustic neuroma surgery. The time from end of the procedure to spontaneous breathing, extubation, eye-opening, hand-squeezing to command, and ability to state name, birthdate and phone number were recorded. The Steward recovery score was also recorded every five minutes during the first 20 minutes postoperatively and then every 10 to 15 minutes. Groups were similar regarding patient characteristics, depth of anaesthesia, sufentanil total dose, anaesthesia duration (D: 349.1 +/- 19.1 min; I: 349.2 +/- 22.9 min), haemodynamic/respiratory parameters, and surgical conditions (assessed by a bleeding score). The emergence time in the D group was significantly faster than the I group (D: 14.9 +/- 2.4 min vs I: 29.2 +/- 2.4 min for eye-opening). Full recovery also occurred earlier in the D group (D: 22.1 +/- 3.1 min vs I: 37.6 +/- 4.0 min, P<0.005 for stating name). Steward recovery scores were also better during the first postoperative hour in the D group (D: 40 min vs I: 90 min, P<0.005 for 100% of patients with Steward score of 6). The results indicate that desflurane is associated with similar operating conditions and faster postoperative recovery following acoustic neuroma surgery. The faster recovery following desflurane may be desirable after long surgical procedures, enabling the patient's full cooperation and facilitating early diagnosis of any potential neurological deficit.     

Desfluran und Isofluran

Objectives. The new volatile anaesthetic desflurane is characterized by very low blood-gas and tissue-blood partition coefficients, so that rapid induction of anaesthesia and shorter recovery times can be expected. The aim of this investigation was to compare the effects of desflurane and isoflurane on haemodynamics and recovery time when used as part of a balanced anaesthesia technique for elective surgery. Methods. Fifty patients (18 years and older, ASA status I-III) scheduled for elective surgery (no laparoscopies) of at least 60?min duration were included in this open, randomised, phase-III clinical trial. After oral premedication with midazolam 7.5?mg 45?min before transfer to theatre, anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl 0.1?mg and thiopental 5?mg/kg; succinylcholine or vecuronium facilitated intubation. Desflurane and isoflurane, respectively, were used for maintenance of anaesthesia, both in 50% N₂O, with the inspired concentration adapted to the degree of stimulation. All patients were ventilated in a semi-closed system; muscle relaxation was achieved with vecuronium. The electrocardiogram, heart rate (HR), and direct arterial blood pressure (BP) were recorded continuously and anaesthetic gas detection was performed by an infrared absorption technique. With termination of surgery the volatile anaesthetic was discontinued and the following emergence times recorded: spontaneous ventilation (V_T>300?ml), extubation, eye opening, correctly answering the date of birth, arrival in and possible discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Results. In all, 49 patients were studied at random (desflurane n=24, isoflurane n=25). Data of demographics and anaesthetic technique were comparable in both groups (Tables?2 and 3). Anaesthetic elimination (expressed as F_A/F_AO) was significantly more rapid in the desflurane group 3?min after termination of anaesthesia (Fig.?1). Comparing the emergence times, there was no significant difference between desflurane and isoflurane: in both groups patients opened their eyes 12?min (median time) after termination of the operation (Table?4). Haemodynamics (HR, systolic and diastolic BP) were comparable at intubation, skin incision, end of surgery, extubation, and in the PACU (Fig.?2a, b). In 2 patients a rapid increase in the inspired concentration of desflurane during induction of anaesthesia produced a profound sympathoadrenergic reaction with an excessive increase in BP and HR. Similar reactions in other patients did not occur when the inspired concentration of desflurance was slowly increased. Conclusions. Despite the physicochemical properties of the new agent, emergence times were similar for desflurane and isoflurane in our study. These results, which are in contrast to those of some other authors, are most probably due to the study design, which included the use of premedicants (midazolam) and a low dose of fentanyl. The reported sympatho-adrenergic reactions after rapid changes in the inspired concentration of desflurane during induction of anaesthesia have been observed by others as well. It seems that this initial cardiovascular stimulation can be avoided by slow increases in desflurane concentration. In summary, desflurane compares to isoflurane in balanced anaesthesia for general surgical procedures with regard to haemodynamics, while the time to awakening is not necessarely reduced.     

Cardiovascular effects of desflurane and isoflurane in patients with coronary artery disease

Background : Anaesthesia in patients with ischaemic heart disease may cause adverse haemodynamic reactions. This investigation compares the cardiovascular effects of equipotent concentrations of desflurane and isoflurane in 30 patients (ASA III) with coronary artery disease before surgical stimulation. Methods : After standardised induction of anaesthesia with etomidate, fentanyl and pancuronium and tracheal intubation patients randomly received either desflurane (group I, n = 15) or isoflurane (group II, n = 15) in slowly increasing concentrations. ST-segment analysis and haemodynamic measurements were performed at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 MAC of desflurane or isoflurane. Results : Cardiac index did not change significantly in the two groups during the administration of the inhalational anaesthetics. Desflurane and isoflurane both caused a dose-dependent significant decrease of mean arterial blood pressure (group I: ?16%; group II: ?18%). As with isoflurane, the decrease of mean arterial pressure produced by desflurane primarily resulted from a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (group I: ?26%, group II: ?21%). Central venous pressure was not affected by the two volatile anaesthetics. Pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure remained unchanged during the administration of isoflurane, but in contrast both parameters significantly increased in patients receiving desflurane (PAP 24%, PCWP 40%). ST-segment analysis provided no signs of myocardial ischaemia. Conclusion : The results of this study demonstrate that in patients with coronary artery disease the haemodynamic effects of equipotent concentrations of desflurane and isoflurane are similar except for a significant increase in PAP and PCWP caused by desflurane. Therefore, desflurane should be administered with great caution if it is used as an alternative anaesthetic in patients with ischaemic heart disease.     

Effects of fentanyl on the incidence of emergence agitation in children receiving desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In children, emergence agitation frequently complicates sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia. The effect of intravenous fentanyl 2.5 microg kg(-1) was examined on the incidence of emergence agitation in children who received desflurane or sevoflurane after midazolam premedication and intravenous thiopental induction. METHODS: One hundred and twenty children (2-7 yr) undergoing adenoidectomy or tonsillectomy, or both, were studied. All children were premedicated orally with midazolam 0.5 mg kg(-1). After intravenous induction with thiopental and atracurium to facilitate endotracheal intubation, patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: Patients in Groups 1 and 3 received physiological saline solution, whereas patients in Groups 2 and 4 received intravenous fentanyl 2.5 microg kg(-1) during induction. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in Groups 1 and 2 and with desflurane in Groups 3 and 4. After discontinuation of the volatile anaesthetic, the times to tracheal extubation and response to verbal stimuli (emergence time), and emergence behaviours were recorded. RESULTS: The time to tracheal extubation was significantly shorter in Groups 3 (5.2+/-1.7 min) and (6.4+/-2.1 min) than in Groups 1 (8.1+/-2.1 min) (P = 0.0001 and 0.006, respectively) and 2 (8.8+/-1.9 min) (P = 0.0001). The emergence time was significantly shorter in Group 3 (10.0+/-3.9 min) than in Groups 1 (13.8+/-4.9 min) (P = 0.017) and 2 (14.9+/-4.1 min) (P = 0.003). The incidence rate of severe agitation was 13% in Groups 1 and 3, and 7 and 10% in Groups 2 and 4, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After midazolam premedication and intravenous induction of anaesthesia with thiopental administration of intravenous fentanyl 2.5 microg kg(-1) did not provide any clinically significant benefit on emer gence agitation in children who receive sevoflurane or desflurane anaesthesia.     

Desflurane or isoflurane for paediatric ENT anaesthesia A comparison of intubating conditions and recovery profile

Background: The inhaled anaesthetic desflurane is characterized by a rapid wash-in and wash-out and may be useful for short paediatric ENT procedures. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the effects of desflurane or isoflurane on intubating conditions and recovery characteristics in paediatric ENT patients. Methods: In this prospective, randomised investigation, we studied 44 children scheduled for ENT surgery, aged 4–12 yr and classified ASA I–II. After thiopentone induction (5–8 mg/kg) the lungs were ventilated by face mask and the vaporizer was dialed to 1 MAC (age-adapted) of desflurane of isoflurane. A reduced dose of vecuronium (0.05 mg/kg) was administered, and intubating conditions were rated 3 min later. Following tracheal intubation, 50% nitrous oxide were added, and the concentration of desflurane or isoflurane was adjusted according to clinical needs. At the end of surgery all anaesthetics were discontinued simultaneously and recovery times were recorded. Results: Intubating conditions were rated significantly better for desflurane (excellent or good 20 of 22) than for isoflurane (12 of 22). Recovery times were significantly shorter for desflurane than for isoflurane (mean±SE): spontaneous ventilation 4.0±0.5 min vs. 6.0±0.7 min, extubation 8.4±0.7 vs. 11.4±1.1 min and arrival at PACU 11.5±0.8 vs. 16.6±1.5 min. No airway complications (coughing, laryngospasm, or desaturation <97%) were noted for either anaesthetic. Conclusions: Following an intravenous induction improved intubating conditions, shorter recovery times and the lack of airway complications make desflurane a suitable alternative to isoflurane for paediatric ENT anaesthesia.     

Desflurane does not accelerate recovery from operations of short duration: a practice audit

PURPOSE: Desflurane, a newer inhalation anesthetic agent, has been promoted as a superior drug because patients will awaken sooner after anesthesia. This has only been proven in operations of long duration (i.e., more than one hour). We assessed our experience using desflurane in short out-patient surgery with a retrospective analysis of a single surgeon's elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. METHODS: With Institutional consent, we performed a retrospective comparison of the postoperative recovery of patients who received desflurane/air/oxygen to historical control patients who received isoflurane/N2O/oxygen. RESULTS: Patient preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups. Duration of surgery and the time from the end of surgery to patient leaving the operating room for the desflurane and isoflurane/N2O groups were (in minutes) 42.7 +/- 13.5 and 9.6 +/- 4.6 vs 47.2 +/- 15.1 and 8.5 +/- 4.1 respectively (P = NS). Total Aldrete scores upon presentation to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were 8.1 +/- 1.4 and 7.9 +/- 1.8 for the two groups respectively (P = NS). The percentage of patients who arrived in the PACU with consciousness scores of 2, 1, 0 for the desflurane and isoflurane/N2O groups were 20.4, 75.5, and 4.1 vs 14.6, 73.2 and 12.2 respectively (P = NS). Mean length of stay in the PACU for the two groups was 160 +/- 111 and 156 +/- 114 min (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our results show that in short procedures the use of desflurane does not necessarily result in faster patient recovery or discharge from the PACU.     

Elderly patients recover more rapidly from desflurane than from isoflurane anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemodynamic, emergence, and recovery characteristics of desflurane-nitrous oxide (N2O) anesthesia with those of isoflurane-N2O anesthesia in elderly patients. DESIGN: Randomized study. SETTING: Main operating room of a major U.S. teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-four ASA physical status II and III patients aged 65 or older undergoing surgical procedures of greater than 1 hour duration. INTERVENTIONS: Group 1 (17 patients) received desflurane in 60% N2O for their surgical procedure. Group 2 (17 patients) received isoflurane in 60% N2O. Thiamylal 2 mg/kg administered intravenously (IV) induced anesthesia, and succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg i.v. facilitated intubation. Muscle relaxation was maintained with vecuronium. Titration of the anesthetics maintained hemodynamics to within 20% of the patients' preinduction values. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurement of hemodynamics occurred every 2 minutes prior to skin incision and every 5 minutes thereafter. The times for discontinuation of inhaled anesthetics to eye opening, hand grip on command, and recall of name and date of birth were measured in a standardized fashion for both groups. The time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was determined by a blinded PACU nurse using standard published criteria. The two groups did not differ with respect to demographics, hemodynamic stability, and times to eye opening (5 +/- 3 minutes for desflurane vs. 8 +/- 4 minutes for isoflurane), hand grip on command (9 +/- 4 minutes vs. 12 +/- 1 minutes), and recall of name and date of birth (13 +/- 8 minutes vs. 12 +/- 7 minutes). The median duration of PACU stay was significantly shorter (p < 0.03) in the desflurane group (80 minutes) compared to the isoflurane group (128 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane may benefit elderly patients by providing a more rapid recovery from anesthesia, leading to a shorter PACU stay.