Intensification treatment based on early FDG‐PET in patients with high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a phase II GELTAMO trial

We conducted a multicentre, phase II study of interim positron emission tomography (PET) as a guide to risk‐adapted therapy in high‐risk patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients achieving negative fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)‐PET after three courses of R‐MegaCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) received three additional courses, whereas PET‐positive patients received two courses of R‐IFE (rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide) followed by BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and autologous stem‐cell transplantation. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). 71 patients (median age 55 years, range 25–69) were enrolled. With a median follow‐up of 42·8 months (range 7·2–58·4), the estimated 4‐year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 67% and 78%, respectively, for the global series. Patients in complete remission after interim PET (N = 36) had significantly better 3‐year PFS than those with partial response (N = 30) [81% vs. 57%, Hazard ratio (HR) = 2·6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·02–6·65] but not a statistically significant longer OS. A retrospective PET central review was done for 51 patients. According to semiquantitative analysis, 3‐year PFS (81% vs. 33%; HR = 6·9, 95% CI = 2·35–20·6) and OS (95% vs. 33%, HR = 19·4, 95% CI = 3·89–97·0) were significantly better for negative than for positive interim PET patients. Early PET assessment is valuable for risk stratification in DLBCL; for this purpose semiquantitative evaluation is a better predictor than visual criteria.     

Circulating myeloid‐derived suppressor cells correlate with clinical outcome in Hodgkin Lymphoma patients treated up‐front with a risk‐adapted strategy

In the attempt to find a peripheral blood biological marker that could mirror the dysregulated microenvironment of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), we analysed the amount of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSC), including the three main sub‐types (monocytic, granulocytic and CD34 + fraction). The absolute MDSC count was investigated in 60 consecutive newly diagnosed HL patients and correlated with clinical variables at diagnosis and outcome. Patients received standard‐of‐care chemotherapy with the exception of interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET‐2)‐positive patients, who were switched early to a salvage regimen. All MDSC subsets were increased in HL patients compared to normal subjects (P < 0·0001) and were higher in non‐responders. However, a strong prognostic significance was limited to immature (CD34⁺) MDSC. A cut‐off level of 0·0045 × 10⁹/l for CD34⁺MDSC resulted in 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 52–99%) sensitivity and 92% (95% CI 81–98%) specificity. The positive predictive value to predict progression‐free survival was 0·90 for PET‐2 and 0·98 for CD34⁺MDSC count; the negative predictive value was 0·57 for PET‐2 and 0·73 for CD34⁺MDSC. PFS was significantly shorter in patients with more than 0·0045 × 10⁹ CD34⁺MDSC cells/l at diagnosis and/or PET‐2 positivity (P < 0·0001). In conclusion, all circulating MDSC subsets are increased in HL; CD34⁺MDSC predict short PFS, similarly to PET‐2 but with the advantage of being available at diagnosis.     

Improved survival for relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma is predicted by a negative pre‐transplant FDG‐PET scan following salvage chemotherapy

The utility of ^[18F]fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ d ‐glucose positron‐emission tomography (FDG‐PET) for predicting outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is uncertain – existing studies include a range of histological subtypes or have a limited duration of follow‐up. Thirty‐nine patients with primary‐refractory or relapsed DLBCL with pre‐ASCT PET scans were analysed. The median follow‐up was 3 years. The 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) for patients with positive PET scans pre‐ASCT was 35% vs. 81% for those who had negative PET scans (P = 0·003). The overall survival (OS) in these groups was 39% and 81% (P = 0·01), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, PET result, number of salvage cycles and the presence of relapsed or refractory disease were shown to predict a longer PFS; PET negativity (P = 0·04) was predictive of a longer OS. PET is useful for defining those with an excellent prognosis post‐ASCT. Although those with positive scans can still be salvaged with current treatments, PET may useful for selecting patients eligible for novel consolidation strategies after salvage therapies.     

Prognostic value of complete remission status at end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET in R‐CHOP‐treated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta‐analysis

This study systematically reviewed and meta‐analysed the prognostic value of complete remission status at end‐of‐treatment ¹⁸F‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐d ‐glucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R‐CHOP). The systematic PubMed/MEDLINE search yielded seven suitable studies comprising a total of 737 R‐CHOP‐treated DLBCL patients who were in complete remission at end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET. Overall, the methodological quality of included studies was reasonable. The disease relapse rate among all patients with complete remission status according to end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET ranged from 7·0% to 20·0%, with a weighted summary proportion of 13·7%. Five of seven studies reported progression‐free survival (PFS) of these patients at various specific time points, i.e., 2‐year PFS (n = 1), estimated 3‐year PFS (n = 3) and 5‐year PFS (n = 1), which was 83%, 85–86·4% and 75%, respectively. Three of seven studies reported overall survival (OS) of these patients at various specific time points, i.e., estimated 3‐year OS (n = 2) and estimated 5‐year OS (n = 1), which were 90%, 93·6% and 83%, respectively. In conclusion, a non‐negligible proportion of R‐CHOP‐treated DLBCL patients who achieve complete remission according to end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET experiences disease relapse during follow‐up.     

Modification of initial therapy in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma,based on interim PET/CT is beneficial: a prospective multicentre trial of 355 patients

This multicentre study evaluated 5‐year progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), where therapy was individualized based on initial prognostic factors and positron emission tomography‐computed tomography performed after two cycles (PET‐2). Between September 2006 and August 2013, 359 patients aged 18–60 years, were recruited in nine Israeli centres. Early‐HL patients initially received ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) ×2. Depending on initial unfavourable prognostic features, PET‐2‐positive patients received additional ABVD followed by involved‐site radiotherapy (ISRT). Patients with negative PET‐2 and favourable disease received ISRT or ABVD ×2; those with unfavourable disease received ABVD ×2 with ISRT or, alternatively, ABVD ×4. Advanced‐HL patients initially received ABVD ×2 or escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; EB) ×2 based on their international prognostic score (≤2 or ≥3). PET‐2‐negative patients further received ABVD ×4; PET‐2‐positive patients received EB ×4 and ISRT to residual masses. With a median follow‐up of 55 (13–119) months, 5‐year PFS was 91% and 69% for PET‐2‐negative and positive early‐HL, respectively; 5‐year OS was 100% and 95%, respectively. For advanced‐HL, the PFS was 81% and 68%, respectively (P = 0·08); 5‐year OS was 98% and 91%, respectively. PET‐2 positivity is associated with inferior prognosis in early‐HL, even with additional ABVD and ISRT. Advanced‐HL patients benefit from therapy escalation following positive PET‐2. EB can be safely de‐escalated to ABVD in PET‐2‐negative patients.     

F‐18 FDG‐PET predicts outcomes for patients receiving total lymphoid irradiation and autologous blood stem‐cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

Total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) followed by high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) is an effective strategy for patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We report outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory HL who received TLI followed by high‐dose chemotherapy and aHSCT. Pre‐transplant fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) studies were scored on the 5‐point Deauville scale. Of 51 patients treated with TLI and aHSCT, 59% had primary refractory disease and 63% had active disease at aHSCT. The 10‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 56% and 54%, respectively. Patients with complete response (CR) by PET prior to aHSCT had a 5‐year PFS and OS of 85% and 100% compared to 52% and 48% for those without CR (P = 0·09 and P = 0·007, respectively). TLI and aHSCT yields excellent disease control and long‐term survival rates for patients with relapsed/refractory HL, including those with high‐risk disease features. Achievement of CR with salvage therapy is a powerful predictor of outcome.     

The prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography scan in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

The prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography (PET) was evaluated after 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastin and dacarbazine in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients (n = 229), based on Deauville criteria. In early stage non‐bulky disease, bulky stage II disease, advanced stage low International Prognostic Score (IPS ≤2) and advanced stage (IPS ≥3), 3‐year progression‐free survival rates in PET2‐negative vs. PET2‐positive groups were 95·9% vs. 76·9% (P < 0·0018), 83·3% vs. 20·0% (P = 0·017), 77·0% vs. 30·0% (P < 0·001) and 71·0% vs. 44·4%(P = 0·155), respectively. The outcome after positive PET2 was better than previously reported. The results from non‐randomized studies of PET2‐guided therapy would be valuable with careful interpretation.     

Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: ELOQUENT‐2 follow‐up and post‐hoc analyses on progression‐free survival and tumour growth

The randomized phase III ELOQUENT‐2 study (NCT01239797) evaluated the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab + lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ELd) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Ld) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 30% versus Ld (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70). Median time from diagnosis was 3·5 years. We present extended 3‐year follow‐up data. Endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and interim overall survival (OS). Exploratory post‐hoc analyses included impact of time from diagnosis and prior lines of therapy on PFS, and serum M‐protein dynamic modelling. ORR was 79% (ELd) and 66% (Ld) (P = 0·0002). ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 27% versus Ld (HR 0·73; P = 0·0014). Interim OS demonstrated a trend in favour of ELd (P = 0·0257); 1‐, 2‐ and 3‐year rates with ELd versus Ld were: 91% versus 83%, 73% versus 69% and 60% versus 53%. In patients with ≥ median time from diagnosis and one prior therapy, ELd resulted in a 53% reduction in the risk of progression/death versus Ld (HR 0·47). Serum M‐protein dynamic modelling showed slower tumour regrowth with ELd. Adverse events were comparable between arms. ELd provided a durable and clinically relevant improvement in efficacy, with minimal incremental toxicity.     

Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first remission: routine positron emission tomography/computerized tomography imaging is not superior to clinical follow‐up for patients with no residual mass

There is no consensus regarding optimal follow‐up mode for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients that achieve complete remission following chemotherapy or combined chemo‐ and radiation therapy. Several studies demonstrated high sensitivity of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in detecting disease progression; however, these techniques are currently not recommended for routine follow‐up. This retrospective study conducted in two Israeli (N = 291) and one New Zealand academic centres (N = 77), compared a group of HL patients, followed‐up with routine imaging every 6 months during the first 2 years after achieving remission, once in the third year, with additional dedicated studies performed due to symptoms or physical findings (Group I) to a group of patients without residual masses who underwent clinically‐based surveillance with dedicated imaging upon relapse suspicion (Group II). Five‐year overall survival (OS) was 94% and median time to relapse was 8·6 months for both modes. Relapse rates in Groups I and II were 13% and 9%, respectively. During the first 3 years of follow‐up, 47·5 and 4·7 studies were performed per detected relapse in Groups I and II, respectively. The current study demonstrated no benefit in either progression‐free survival (PFS) or OS in HL patients followed by routine imaging versus clinical follow‐up. The cost was 10 times higher for routine imaging.     

The role of FDG‐PET/CT in the evaluation of residual disease in paediatric non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

¹⁸F‐labelled–fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) findings are challenging to interpret for residual disease versus complete response in paediatric patients with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A biopsy is often warranted to confirm the presence or absence of viable tumour if there is clinical or radiographic evidence of residual disease. In this study, we compared conventional imaging and FDG‐PET/computerized tomography (CT) findings with biopsy results in 18 children with NHL. Our goal was to provide additional data to establish more reliable criteria for response evaluation. Residual disease was suspected after conventional imaging alone in eight patients, after FDG‐PET/CT alone in three and after both modalities in seven patients. Biopsy confirmed the presence of viable tumour in two patients. Two additional patients experienced progressive disease or relapse. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of FDG‐PET/CT using the London criteria to indicate residual tumour detectable by biopsy were 100%, but specificity was low (60%), as was the positive predictive value (25%). Thus, in this study, a negative FDG‐PET/CT finding was a good indicator of complete remission. However, because false‐positive FDG‐PET/CT findings are common, biopsy and close monitoring are required for accurate determination of residual disease in individual patients.     

Response‐adapted therapy for aggressive non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas based on early [18F] FDG‐PET scanning: ECOG‐ACRIN Cancer Research Group study (E3404)

A persistently positive positron emission tomography (PET) scan during therapy for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is predictive of treatment failure. A response‐adapted strategy consisting of an early treatment change to four cycles of R‐ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) was studied in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 trial. Previously untreated patients with DLBCL stage III, IV, or bulky II, were eligible. PET scan was performed after three cycles of R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) and scored as positive or negative by central review during the fourth cycle. PET‐positive patients received four cycles of R‐ICE, PET‐negative patients received two more cycles of R‐CHOP. A ≥45% 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) for mid‐treatment PET‐positive patients was viewed as promising. Of 74 patients, 16% were PET positive, 79% negative. The PET positivity rate was much lower than the 33% expected. Two‐year PFS was 70%; 42% [90% confidence interval (CI), 19–63%] for PET‐positives and 76% (90% CI 65–84%) for PET‐negatives. Three‐year overall survival (OS) was 69% (90% CI 43–85%) and 93% (90% CI 86–97%) for PET‐positive and ‐negative cases, respectively. The 2‐year PFS for mid‐treatment PET‐positive patients intensified to R‐ICE was 42%, with a wide confidence interval due to the low proportion of positive mid‐treatment PET scans. Treatment modification based on early PET scanning should remain confined to clinical trials.     

Clinical applicability and prognostic significance of molecular response assessed by fluorescent‐PCR of immunoglobulin genes in multiple myeloma. Results from a GEM/PETHEMA study

Minimal residual disease monitoring is becoming increasingly important in multiple myeloma (MM), but multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and allele‐specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (ASO‐PCR) techniques are not routinely available. This study investigated the prognostic influence of achieving molecular response assessed by fluorescent‐PCR (F‐PCR) in 130 newly diagnosed MM patients from Grupo Español Multidisciplinar de Melanoma (GEM)2000/GEM05 trials (NCT00560053, NCT00443235, NCT00464217) who achieved almost very good partial response after induction therapy. As a reference, we used the results observed with simultaneous MFC. F‐PCR at diagnosis was performed on DNA using three different multiplex PCRs: IGH D‐J, IGK V‐J and KDE rearrangements. The applicability of F‐PCR was 91·5%. After induction therapy, 64 patients achieved molecular response and 66 non‐molecular response; median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 61 versus 36 months, respectively (P = 0·001). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR) in molecular response patients (5‐year survival: 75%) versus 66 months in the non‐molecular response group (P = 0·03). The corresponding PFS and OS values for patients with immunophenotypic versus non‐immunophenotypic response were 67 versus 42 months (P = 0·005) and NR (5‐year survival: 95%) versus 69 months (P = 0·004), respectively. F‐PCR analysis is a rapid, affordable, and easily performable technique that, in some circumstances, may be a valid approach for minimal residual disease investigations in MM.     

Prospective subgroup analyses of the randomized MCL‐002 (SPRINT) study: lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

In the mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)‐002 study, lenalidomide demonstrated significantly improved median progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with investigator's choice (IC) in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Here we present the long‐term follow‐up data and results of preplanned subgroup exploratory analyses from MCL‐002 to evaluate the potential impact of demographic factors, baseline clinical characteristics and prior therapies on PFS. In MCL‐002, patients with relapsed/refractory MCL were randomized 2:1 to receive lenalidomide (25 mg/day orally on days 1–21; 28‐day cycles) or single‐agent IC therapy (rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil or cytarabine). The intent‐to‐treat population comprised 254 patients (lenalidomide, n = 170; IC, n = 84). Subgroup analyses of PFS favoured lenalidomide over IC across most characteristics, including risk factors, such as high MCL International Prognostic Index score, age ≥65 years, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), stage III/IV disease, high tumour burden, and refractoriness to last prior therapy. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, factors associated with significantly longer PFS (other than lenalidomide treatment) included normal LDH levels (P < 0·001), nonbulky disease (P = 0·045), <3 prior antilymphoma treatments (P = 0·005), and ≥6 months since last prior treatment (P = 0·032). Overall, lenalidomide improved PFS versus single‐agent IC therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, irrespective of many demographic factors, disease characteristics and prior treatment history.     

Effects of single‐agent bortezomib as post‐transplant consolidation therapy on multiple myeloma‐related bone disease: a randomized phase II study

This phase II study explored the effects of bortezomib consolidation versus observation on myeloma‐related bone disease in patients who had a partial response or better after frontline high‐dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients were randomized to receive four 35‐day cycles of bortezomib 1·6 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, or an equivalent observation period, and followed up for disease status/survival. The modified intent‐to‐treat population included 104 patients (51 bortezomib, 53 observation). There were no meaningful differences in the primary endpoint of change from baseline to end of treatment in bone mineral density (BMD). End‐of‐treatment rates (bortezomib versus observation) of complete response/stringent complete response were 22% vs. 11% (P = 0·19), very good partial response or better of 80% vs. 68% (P = 0·17), and progressive disease of 8% vs. 23% (P = 0·06); median progression‐free survival was 44·9 months vs. 21·8 months (P = 0·22). Adverse events observed ≥15% more frequently with bortezomib versus observation were diarrhoea (37% vs. 0), peripheral sensory neuropathy (20% vs. 4%), nausea (18% vs. 0) and vomiting (16% vs. 0). Compared with observation, bortezomib appeared to have little impact on bone metabolism/health, but was associated with trends for improved myeloma response and survival.     

Favourable outcomes of poor prognosis diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated with dose‐dense Rituximab,high‐dose Methotrexate and six cycles of CHOP‐14 compared to first‐line autologous transplantation

The optimal therapeutic approach for young diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with high‐intermediate and high‐risk age‐adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI) remains unknown. Hereby we report a 10‐year single‐centre study of 63 consecutively treated patients. To optimize outcome, two approaches were carried out: Cohort 1 patients received four cycles R‐CHOP‐21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone over 21 days) followed by first‐line high‐dose chemotherapy with autologous stem‐cell support (HDCT‐ASCT), resulting in 2‐year progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 60·6% and 67·9%. 39·4% of those patients were not transplanted upfront, mainly due to early progressive disease (24·2%). Cohort 2 patients received an early intensified protocol of six cycles of CHOP‐14 (cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone over 14 days) with dose‐dense rituximab and high‐dose methotrexate resulting in promising overall response‐ (93·3%) and complete remission (90%) rates and sustained survival (2‐year PFS and OS: 93·3%). In an intention‐to‐treat analysis, 2‐year PFS (60·6% vs. 93·3%, hazard ratio [HR] 7·2, P = 0·009) and OS (69·7% vs. 93·3%, HR 4·95, P = 0·038) differed significantly, in favour of the early intensified protocol (Cohort 2). In a multivariate Cox‐regression model, PFS (HR 8·12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1·83–35·9, P = 0·006) and OS (HR 5·86, 95% CI 1·28–26·8, P = 0·02) remained superior for Cohort 2 when adjusted for aaIPI3 as the most important prognostic factor. Survival of young poor‐prognosis DLBCL patients appears superior after early therapy intensification.     

PET-adapted therapy after three cycles of ABVD for all stages of Hodgkin lymphoma: results of the GATLA LH-05 trial

The role of Ann Arbor staging in determining treatment intensity after achieving a negative positron emission tomography (PET) has not been established in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Patients with stage I–IV cHL, received three cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and an interim PET scan (PET3). PET3-negative patients received no further therapy. PET3-positive patients received three additional cycles of ABVD plus involved-field radiation therapy or salvage chemotherapy, if refractory to ABVD, and were re-evaluated by PET scan (PET6). Study endpoints were 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. Two hundred and thirty-nine patients with early-stage and 138 with advanced-stage were evaluable. Overall, 260 patients (70%) were PET3-negative and had higher 3-year PFS (90% vs. 65%; P < 0·0001) and OS (98% vs. 92%; P = 0·007) rates than PET3-positive patients. All PET3-negative patients, regardless of disease stage at diagnosis, achieved similarly good PFS (90–91%; P = 0·76) and OS (97–99%). The only independent prognostic factor for PFS was PET3-negativity (Hazard ratio 3·8; 95% confidence interval 2·4–6·3; P < 0·0001). This study suggests that cHL patients who achieve a negative PET3 following ABVD have an excellent outcome, regardless of stage at diagnosis. An appropriately powered, phase III trial will be necessary to confirm these findings.     

Value of contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detection and presurgical assessment of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study

Background and Aim: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) associated with computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used for the detection and the staging of pancreatic cancer, but data regarding its clinical added value in pre‐surgical planning is still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of FDG PET associated with contrast‐enhanced CT in detection of pancreatic cancer. Methods: We prospectively evaluated FDG PET/CT studies obtained in patients with suspicion of operable pancreatic cancer between May 2006 and January 2008. Staging was conducted according to a standardized protocol, and findings were confirmed in all patients by surgical resection or biopsy examination. Results: Forty‐five patients with a median age of 69 (range 22–82) were included in this study. Thirty‐six had malignant tumors and nine had benign lesions (20%). The sensitivity of enhanced versus unenhanced PET/CT in the detection of pancreatic cancer was 96% versus 72% (P = 0.076), the specificity 66.6% versus 33.3% (P = 0.52), the positive predictive value 92.3% versus 80% (P = 0.3), the negative predictive value 80% versus 25% (P = 0.2), and the accuracy 90.3% versus 64% (P = 0.085). Conclusions: Our preliminary data obtained in a limited number of patients shows that contrast‐enhanced FDG PET/CT offers good sensitivity in the detection and assessment of pancreatic cancer, but at the price of a relatively low specificity. Enhanced PET/CT seems to be superior to unenhanced PET/CT. Further larger prospective studies are needed to establish its value for pre‐surgical diagnosis and staging in pancreatic cancer.     

Prognostic utility of pre-transplantation [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who underwent rituximab,dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine,carboplatin salvage chemotherapy

We analysed the outcomes of 62 patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) who had pre-transplantation fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after R-DHAC (rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, carboplatin) salvage chemotherapy, and were evaluated using Deauville criteria and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). A positive pre-transplantation PET/CT with Deauville score of 5 was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0·01), while a Deauville score of 4 was not predictive of outcome. Only pre-transplant TLG was significantly associated with both PFS (P = 0·005) and overall survival (P = 0·03). TLG deserves to be further investigated in prospective studies.     

Eradication of minimal residual disease improves overall and progression‐free survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia,evidence from NCRN CLL207: a phase II trial assessing alemtuzumab consolidation

With immunochemotherapy, remission duration and survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is dependent on the level of minimal residual disease (MRD ) after treatment. This phase II trial assessed alemtuzumab consolidation post‐chemotherapy in patients who responded with persistent low levels of detectable disease. Blood was screened for MRD using multi‐parameter flow cytometry, 6–24 months post‐chemotherapy. MRD ‐positive participants received alemtuzumab 30 mg subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 6 weeks. Following a marrow assessment, MRD ‐negative participants or non‐responders stopped therapy and MRD ‐positive participants with 1 + log reduction had 6 more weeks of alemtuzumab. Alemtuzumab consolidation was received by 47 participants. One death and 19 of 22 serious adverse events reported from 17 (36%) participants were alemtuzumab‐related. MRD eradication from blood and bone marrow was achieved in 39 (83%) participants at the end of consolidation, with 18 (38%) remaining MRD ‐negative in the blood 6 months later. Of the 18 participants who were MRD ‐negative at 6 months, the median time to MRD relapse was 46 months, which was similar to patients who were MRD ‐negative at baseline and were followed up. The 5‐year progression‐free survival (PFS ) and overall survival (OS ) of participants who were MRD ‐negative at 6 months was significantly better than MRD ‐positive participants [PFS : 78% vs. 39% (P  =  0·010), OS : 89% vs. 64% (P  =  0·029)].     

The presence of genomic imbalances is associated with poor outcome in patients with burkitt lymphoma treated with dose‐intensive chemotherapy including rituximab

The introduction of Rituximab has improved the outcome and survival rates of Burkitt lymphoma (BL). However, early relapse and refractoriness are current limitations of BL treatment and new biological factors affecting the outcome of these patients have not been explored. This study aimed to identify the presence of genomic changes that could predict the response to new therapies in BL. Forty adolescent and adult BL patients treated with the Dose‐Intensive Chemotherapy Including Rituximab (Burkimab) protocol (Spanish Programme for the Study and Treatment of Haematological Malignancies; PETHEMA) were analysed using array‐based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In addition, the presence of TP53, TCF3 (E2A), ID3 and GNA13 mutations was assessed by next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Ninety‐seven per cent of the patients harboured genomic imbalances. Losses on 11q, 13q, 15q or 17p were associated with a poor response to Burkimab therapy (P = 0·038), shorter progression‐free survival (PFS; P = 0·007) and overall survival (OS; P = 0·009). The integrative analysis of array‐CGH and NGS showed that 26·3% (5/19) and 36·8% (7/19) of patients carried alterations in the TP53 and TCF3 genes, respectively. TP53 alterations were associated with shorter PFS (P = 0·011) while TCF3 alterations were associated with shorter OS (P = 0·032). Genetic studies could be used for risk stratification of BL patients treated with the Burkimab protocol.