Maintenance lenalidomide in combination with 5‐azacitidine as post‐remission therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia

In this Phase 1b study, the safety and tolerability of maintenance therapy, comprising lenalidomide (0–25 mg, days 5–25) in combination with azacitidine (50–75 mg/m², days 1–5) every 28 d, was explored in 40 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in complete remission after chemotherapy. Eligibility included AML in first complete remission (CR1) with adverse risk karyotype (n = 8), fms‐related tyrosine kinase 3‐internal tandem duplication (FLT3‐ITD) (n = 5), age ≥60 years (n = 31) or AML in second remission (CR2) (n = 14). Dose‐limiting toxicity was not reached. Common toxicities were haematological, infection, injection pain, constipation, fatigue and diarrhoea. In CR1, median relapse‐free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was 12 and 20 months, respectively. In CR2, median RFS was 11 months, with median OS not yet reached. Among 29 patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk, RFS was 50% at 24 months. There were five patients with concomitant FLT3‐ITD and nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutation; none have relapsed and all are still alive after 17–39 months. Maintenance lenalidomide/azacitidine augmented the function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, particularly in patients with NPM1 mutation. The lenalidomide/azacitidine maintenance combination was effective in suppressing residual DNA (cytosine‐5‐)‐methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A)‐positive disease, resulting in sustained remission in patients with concurrent NPM1 mutation. Azacitidine/lenalidomide as maintenance therapy for high‐risk AML warrants further exploration.     

Prolonged responses in patients with MDS and CMML treated with azacitidine and etanercept

Combination therapy with azacitidine and etanercept was hypothesized to lead to improved responses in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Thirty‐two patients with MDS/chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia were treated with azacitidine + etanercept; 30 completed at least three therapy cycles. At 3 months, nine patients had achieved complete response (CR), two had partial response, 10 had marrow CRs, seven had stable disease, two patients had haematological improvement without marrow response and two patients had disease progression. The overall response rate was 72%; median duration of response was not reached at 2 years. Marrow response rates and duration were improved with azacitidine + etanercept compared to azacitidine alone.     

Mammalian‐target of rapamycin inhibition with temsirolimus in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients is associated with considerable toxicity: results of the temsirolimus pilot trial by the German MDS Study Group (D‐MDS)

The mammalian‐target of rapamycin (also termed mechanistic target of rapamycin, mTOR) pathway integrates various pro‐proliferative and anti‐apoptotic stimuli and is involved in regulatory T‐cell (TREG) development. As these processes contribute to the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), we hypothesized that mTOR modulation with temsirolimus (TEM) might show activity in MDS. This prospective multicentre trial enrolled lower and higher risk MDS patients, provided that they were transfusion‐dependent/neutropenic or relapsed/refractory to 5‐azacitidine, respectively. All patients received TEM at a weekly dose of 25 mg. Of the 9 lower‐ and 11 higher‐risk patients included, only 4 (20%) reached the response assessment after 4 months of treatment and showed stable disease without haematological improvement. The remaining patients discontinued TEM prematurely due to adverse events. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the lower‐risk group and 296 days in the higher‐risk group. We observed a significant decline of bone marrow (BM) vascularisation (P = 0·006) but were unable to demonstrate a significant impact of TEM on the balance between TREG and pro‐inflammatory T‐helper‐cell subsets within the peripheral blood or BM. We conclude that mTOR‐modulation with TEM at a dose of 25 mg per week is accompanied by considerable toxicity and has no beneficial effects in elderly MDS patients.     

Iron‐chelating therapy with deferasirox in transfusion‐dependent,higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective,multicentre study

Iron chelation is controversial in higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR‐MDS), outside the allogeneic transplant setting. We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study in 51 patients with transfusion‐dependent, intermediate‐to‐very high risk MDS, according to the revised international prognostic scoring system, treated with the oral iron chelating agent deferasirox (DFX). Thirty‐six patients (71%) received azacitidine concomitantly. DFX was given at a median dose of 1000 mg/day (range 375–2500 mg) for a median of 11 months (range 0·4–75). Eight patients (16%) showed grade 2–3 toxicities (renal or gastrointestinal), 4 of whom (8%) required drug interruption. Median ferritin levels decreased from 1709 μg/l at baseline to 1100 μg/l after 12 months of treatment (P = 0·02). Seventeen patients showed abnormal transaminase levels at baseline, which improved or normalized under DFX treatment in eight cases. One patient showed a remarkable haematological improvement. At a median follow up of 35·3 months, median overall survival was 37·5 months. The results of this first survey of DFX in HR‐MDS are comparable, in terms of safety and efficacy, with those observed in lower‐risk MDS. Though larger, prospective studies are required to demonstrate real clinical benefits, our data suggest that DFX is feasible and might be considered in a selected cohort of HR‐MDS patients.     

Azacitidine in the ‘real‐world’: an evaluation of 1101 higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome/low blast count acute myeloid leukaemia patients in Ontario,Canada

The outcome of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients with uniformly higher‐risk disease treated with azacitidine (AZA) in the ‘real‐world’ remains largely unknown. We evaluated 1101 consecutive higher‐risk MDS patients (International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate‐2/high) and low‐blast count acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; 21–30% blasts) patients treated in Ontario, Canada. By dosing schedule, 24·7% received AZA for seven consecutive days, 12·4% for six consecutive days and 62·9% by 5‐2‐2. Overall, median number of cycles was 6 (range 1–67) and 8 (range 6–14) when restricted to the 692 (63%) patients who received at least 4 cycles. The actuarial median survival was 11·6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10·7–12·4) for the entire cohort and 18·0 months (landmark analysis; 95% CI 16·6–19·1 months) for those receiving at least 4 cycles. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the 3 dosing schedules (P = 0·87). In our large ‘real‐world’ evaluation of AZA in higher‐risk MDS/low‐blast count AML, we demonstrated a lower than expected OS. Reassuringly, survival did not differ by dosing schedules. The OS was higher in the 2/3 of patients who received at least 4 cycles of treatment, reinforcing the necessity of sustained administration until therapeutic benefits are realised. This represents the largest ‘real‐world’ evaluation of AZA in higher‐risk MDS/low‐blast count AML.     

Elevated fetal haemoglobin is a predictor of better outcome in MDS/AML patients receiving 5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine (Decitabine)

Although azanucleoside DNA‐hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are routinely used for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML), very few outcome predictors have been established. Expression of the β‐like globin gene locus is tightly regulated by DNA methylation, is HMA‐sensitive in vitro, and fetal haemoglobin (HbF) expression is under study as a potential biomarker for response of MDS patients to azacitidine. We determined HbF expression in 16 MDS and 36 AML patients receiving decitabine (DAC). Pre‐treatment HbF was already elevated (>1·0% of total haemoglobin) in 7/16 and 12/36 patients, and HbF was induced by DAC in 81%/54% of MDS/AML patients, respectively. Elevated pre‐treatment HbF was associated with longer median overall survival (OS): 26·6 vs. 8·6 months for MDS (hazard ratio [HR] 8·56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1·74–42·49, P = 0·008, with similarly longer progression‐free and AML‐free survival), and 10·0 vs. 2·9 months OS for AML (HR 3·01, 95% CI 1·26–7·22, P = 0·014). In a multivariate analysis, the prognostic value of HbF was retained. Time‐dependent Cox models revealed that the prognostic value of treatment‐induced HbF induction was inferior to that of pre‐treatment HbF. In conclusion, we provide first evidence for in vivo HbF induction by DAC in MDS/AML, and demonstrate prognostic value of elevated pre‐treatment HbF, warranting prospective, randomized studies.     

Long‐term follow‐up of imatinib plus combination chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The effects of imatinib plus chemotherapy were assessed in 87 patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome‐positive (Ph⁺) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Imatinib was administered continuously, starting from the eighth day of remission induction chemotherapy, then through five courses of consolidation or until allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Patients who were not transplanted were maintained on imatinib for 2 years. Eighty‐two patients (94.3%) achieved complete remission (CR). Among these 82 CR patients, 40 experienced recurrence of leukemia. The 5‐year relapse free survival (RFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rates were 39.0% and 33.4%, respectively. In total, 56 patients underwent allogeneic HCT in first CR. The 5‐year cumulative incidence of relapse and OS rate of them were 59.1% and 52.6%, respectively. Six of seven patients who were maintained on imatinib after completion of consolidation relapsed and the median time of RFS was 40.7 months. In total patient, cumulative molecular CR rate was 88.5% and median time of molecular CR duration was 13 months. Initial imatinib dose intensity was significantly associated with median CR duration (P < 0.0001), and overall survival (P = 0.002). During the initial phase of treatment of patients with Ph⁺ ALL, it is important to maintain imatinib dose intensity. Am. J. Hematol. 90:1013–1020, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparative analysis between azacitidine and decitabine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

The present study aimed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of azacitidine and decitabine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We compared the overall response rate (ORR) (complete responses, partial responses, marrow complete responses, and haematological improvements), overall survival (OS), event‐free survival (EFS), time to leukaemic transformation, and adverse outcomes between azacitidine and decitabine. To minimize the effects of treatment selection bias in this observational study, adjustments were made using the propensity‐score matching method. Among 300 patients, 203 were treated with azacitidine and 97 with decitabine. Propensity‐score matching yielded 97 patient pairs. In the propensity‐matched cohort, there were no significant differences between the azacitidine and decitabine groups regarding ORR (44% vs. 52%), OS (26 vs. 22·9 months), EFS (7·7 vs. 7·0 months), and rate of leukaemic transformation (16% vs. 22% at 1 year). In patients ≥65 years of age, survival was significantly better in the azacitidine group (P = 0·017). Patients who received decitabine experienced more frequent episodes of grade 3 or 4 cytopenia and infectious episodes. We found that azacitidine and decitabine showed comparable efficacy. Among patients ≥65 years of age, survival was significantly better in the azacitidine group (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01409070).     

A limited number of 5-azacitidine cycles can be effective treatment in MDS

Hypomethylating agents, such as 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) and 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (decitabine), have recently been approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Several randomized trials have shown favorable results concerning response rate, survival, transformation to acute leukemia, and quality of life. In these trials, treatment was administered continuously until progression. In the retrospective study presented here, we evaluated the outcome of patients with higher risk MDS or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) treated with a limited number of 5-AZA cycles. A total of 32 patients received 5-AZA alone (n = 30) or in combination with valproic acid and all-trans retinoic acid (n = 2). 5-AZA was administered subcutaneously at a fixed dose of 75 mg/m² daily for 7 days and repeated every 28 days. 5-AZA was given for a median of four courses. Treatment was continued for two more cycles as consolidation in patients who had achieved complete remission (CR), marrow CR, or stable disease with hematologic improvement. The overall response rate was 50% according to the modified International Working Group criteria. Complete remissions were achieved in 15.6% and stable disease in 34.4% of patients. Peripheral blood counts normalized in 6.3% of patients while hematologic improvement was achieved in 25%. The median time to AML in responding patients was 45 weeks, while AML occurred after a median of 14 weeks in non-responding patients (P = .038). The median survival of all patients was 60 weeks; the median survival of responders was 74 weeks compared with 26 weeks in non-responders (P = .047). In this retrospective analysis, 5-AZA was associated with a survival advantage in responding patients with higher risk MDS or sAML. These favorable results suggest that patients may benefit even from a limited number of courses of 5-AZA. A randomized controlled clinical trial is required to prospectively validate these findings. Contributions: C. M.-T. collected and analyzed data. T.S. performed statistical analyses. C.P. advised on analysis and interpretation of the data. K.S.G. designed the study and analyzed data. C. M.-T. and K.S.G. wrote the paper.     

Platelet count doubling after the first cycle of azacitidine therapy predicts eventual response and survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia but does not add to prognostic utility of the revised IPSS

Reliable clinical or molecular predictors of benefit from azacitidine therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are not defined. Doubling of platelet count at start of second cycle of azacitidine therapy compared to baseline was associated with achieving response and survival advantage in a Dutch cohort. To validate this observation, we analysed a larger cohort of North American patients, whose data was collected in a prospective clinical trial with a longer median follow‐up. We found a significant association between platelet count doubling after first cycle of azacitidine therapy and probability of achieving objective response. Among patients with MDS or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia (<30% bone marrow blasts, n = 102), there was a statistically significant reduction in risk of death for patients who achieved platelet count doubling (n = 23, median OS, 21·0 months) compared to those who did not (n = 79, median OS, 16·7 months, adjusted hazard ratio (no/yes)=1·88, 95% confidence interval, 1·03–3·40, P = 0·04). Nonetheless, the addition of this platelet count doubling variable did not improve the survival prediction provided by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System or the French Prognostic Scoring System. Identification of reliable and consistent predictors for clinical benefit for azacitidine therapy remains an unmet medical need and a top research priority.     

Comparative clinical effectiveness of azacitidine versus decitabine in older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

The hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine and decitabine are both approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the USA. In Europe, decitabine is not approved due to lack of survival advantage in randomized trials. The two drugs have not been compared in clinical trials. We identified patients diagnosed with MDS between 2004 and 2011 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked database in the USA who received ≥ 10 doses of either HMA. We estimated survival from HMA initiation with Kaplan–Meier methods and used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for covariates. Analyses controlled for histological subtype and we conducted a subset analysis limited to patients with refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB). In 2025 HMA‐treated patients, median survival was 15 months with no difference in survival based on the HMA received in adjusted analysis (decitabine versus azacitidine, hazard ratio = 1·06, 95% confidence interval: 0·94–1·19, P = 0·37). For RAEB patients (n = 523), median survival was 12 months, with no significant difference based on HMA received. No significant survival difference was found between azacitidine and decitabine in patients with MDS, including RAEB. Importantly, population‐based survival of azacitidine‐treated RAEB patients was substantially shorter than in the AZA‐001 clinical trial (11 versus 24·5 months).     

Platelet doubling after the first azacitidine cycle is a promising predictor for response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients in the Dutch azacitidine compassionate named patient programme

The efficacy of azacitidine in the treatment of high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (20–30% blasts) has been demonstrated. To investigate the efficacy of azacitidine in daily clinical practice and to identify predictors for response, we analysed a cohort of 90 MDS, CMML and AML patients who have been treated in a Dutch compassionate named patient programme. Patients received azacitidine for a median of five cycles (range 1–19). The overall response rate (complete/partial/haematological improvement) was 57% in low risk MDS, 53% in high risk MDS, 50% in CMML, and 39% in AML patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 13·0 (9·8–16·2) months. Multivariate analysis confirmed circulating blasts [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0·48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·24–0·99; P = 0·05] and poor risk cytogenetics (HR 0·45, 95% CI 0·22–0·91; P = 0·03) as independent predictors for OS. Interestingly, this analysis also identified platelet doubling after the first cycle of azacitidine as a simple and independent positive predictor for OS (HR 5·4, 95% CI 0·73–39·9; P = 0·10). In conclusion, routine administration of azacitidine to patients with variable risk groups of MDS, CMML and AML is feasible, and subgroups with distinct efficacy of azacitidine treatment can be identified.     

Prognostic value of complete remission status at end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET in R‐CHOP‐treated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta‐analysis

This study systematically reviewed and meta‐analysed the prognostic value of complete remission status at end‐of‐treatment ¹⁸F‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐d ‐glucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R‐CHOP). The systematic PubMed/MEDLINE search yielded seven suitable studies comprising a total of 737 R‐CHOP‐treated DLBCL patients who were in complete remission at end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET. Overall, the methodological quality of included studies was reasonable. The disease relapse rate among all patients with complete remission status according to end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET ranged from 7·0% to 20·0%, with a weighted summary proportion of 13·7%. Five of seven studies reported progression‐free survival (PFS) of these patients at various specific time points, i.e., 2‐year PFS (n = 1), estimated 3‐year PFS (n = 3) and 5‐year PFS (n = 1), which was 83%, 85–86·4% and 75%, respectively. Three of seven studies reported overall survival (OS) of these patients at various specific time points, i.e., estimated 3‐year OS (n = 2) and estimated 5‐year OS (n = 1), which were 90%, 93·6% and 83%, respectively. In conclusion, a non‐negligible proportion of R‐CHOP‐treated DLBCL patients who achieve complete remission according to end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET experiences disease relapse during follow‐up.     

Rituximab plus hyper‐CVAD alternating with MTX/Ara‐C in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: 15‐year follow‐up of a phase II study from the MD Anderson Cancer Center

Intensive chemotherapy regimens containing cytarabine have substantially improved remission durability and overall survival in younger adults with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, there have been no long‐term follow‐up results for patients treated with these regimens. We present long‐term survival outcomes from a pivotal phase II trial of rituximab, hyper‐fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine (R‐HCVAD/MA) . At 15 years of follow‐up (median: 13·4 years), the median failure‐free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 4·8 years and 10·7 years, respectively. The FFS seems to have plateaued after 10 years, with an estimated 15‐year FFS of 30% in younger patients (≤65 years). Patients who achieved complete response (CR) after 2 cycles had a favourable median FFS of 8·8 years. Six patients developed myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML) whilst in first CR. The 10‐year cumulative incidence of MDS/AML of patients in first remission was 6·2% (95% confidence interval: 2·5–12·2%). In patients with newly diagnosed MCL, R‐HCVAD/MA showed sustained efficacy, with a median OS exceeding 10 years in all patients and freedom from disease recurrence of nearly 15 years in almost one‐third of the younger patients (≤65 years).     

Azacitidine improves outcome in higher‐risk MDS patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities: a retrospective comparison of GESMD and GFM registries

Treatment with azacitidine (AZA) has been suggested to be of benefit for higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR‐MDS) patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities (Abn 7). This retrospective study of 235 HR‐MDS patients with Abn 7 treated with AZA (n = 115) versus best supportive care (BSC; n = 120), assessed AZA treatment as a time‐varying variable in multivariable analysis. A Cox Regression model with time‐interaction terms of overall survival (OS) at different time points confirmed that, while chromosome 7 cytogenetic categories (complex karyotype [CK] versus non‐CK) and International Prognostic Scoring System risk (high versus intermediate‐2) retained poor prognosis over time, AZA treatment had a favourable impact on OS during the first 3 years of treatment compared to BSC (Hazard ratio [HR] 0·5 P < 0·001 at 1 year, 0·7 P = 0·019 at 2 years; 0·73 P = 0·029 at 3 years). This benefit was present in all chromosome 7 categories, but tended to be greater in patients with CK (risk reduction of 82%, 68% and 53% at 1, 3 and 6 months in CK patients; 79% at 1 month in non‐CK patients, P < 0·05 for all). AZA also significantly improved progression‐free survival (P < 0·01). This study confirms a time‐dependent benefit of AZA on outcome in patients with HR‐MDS and cytogenetic abnormalities involving chromosome 7, especially for those with CK.     

Deferasirox chelation therapy in patients with transfusion‐dependent MDS: a ‘real‐world’ report from two regional Italian registries: Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie and Registro Basilicata

Deferasirox (DFX) is an orally administered iron chelator approved for use in patients with transfusion‐dependent iron overload due to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The safety and efficacy of DFX has been explored in clinical trial settings, but there is little data on unselected patients with MDS. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety, compliance, efficacy and effect on haematopoiesis of DFX in a large ‘real‐world’ MDS population. One hundred and eighteen patients with transfusion‐dependent MDS were treated with DFX across 11 centres in Italy. Serum ferritin levels, haematological response, dosing, adverse events and transfusion dependence were recorded at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months following initiation of treatment. DFX reduced mean serum ferritin levels from 1790 to 1140 ng/mL (P < 0.001), with 7.1% of patients achieving transfusion independence. Significant haematological improvement was seen in erythroid (17.6%), platelet (5.9%) and neutrophil counts (7.1%). Adverse events were reported in 47.5% of patients, including gastrointestinal and renal toxicity. Regression analysis showed that higher starting doses of DFX are associated with transfusion independence at 24 months. DFX is a safe, effective treatment for transfusion‐dependent MDS that can lead to transfusion independence and haematological improvement in a subset of patients.     

Phase II study of tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or high‐risk MDS

Tosedostat, an oral aminopeptidase inhibitor, has synergy with cytarabine and hypomethylating agents. We performed a Phase II trial to determine rates of complete remission (CR) and survival using tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in older patients with untreated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Thirty‐four patients ≥60 years old (median age 70 years; range, 60–83) were randomized to receive tosedostat (120 mg on days 1–21 or 180 mg continuously) with 5 d of either cytarabine (1 g/m²/d) or decitabine (20 mg/m²/d) every 35 d. Twenty‐nine patients (85%) had AML, including 15 (44%) with secondary AML/MDS, and 5 (15%) had MDS‐refractory anaemia with excess blasts type 2. The CR/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 53% [9 in each arm; 14 CR (41%) and 4 CRi (12%)], attained in 6 of 14 patients with adverse cytogenetics and 4 of 7 with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication mutations. Median follow‐up was 11·2 months (range, 0·5–22·3), and median survival was 11·5 months (95% confidence interval, 5·2–16·7). Twenty‐three patients (67·6%) were treated as outpatients and 10 of these patients required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3–4 non‐haematological toxicities required withdrawal from study. Tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine is tolerated in older patients with untreated AML/MDS, results in a CR/CRi rate of >50%, and warrants further study in larger trials.     

Rapid loss of response after withdrawal of treatment with azacitidine: a case series in patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the likelihood of having a sustained response to azacitidine is increased by maximizing treatment duration. This is important as prognosis postrelapse is poor. There is also the concern that early termination of treatment may result in rapid disease progression. We reviewed outcomes in 13 patients who discontinued azacitidine (decitabine in one patient) while still responding to the treatment. Most patients rapidly relapsed; median time to progression was 5.4 months. Reasons for treatment discontinuation included comorbidities, infections, and patient choice. These findings illustrate the risk of prematurely terminating azacitidine therapy in MDS.     

Demonstration of additional benefit in adding lenalidomide to azacitidine in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Lenalidomide and azacitidine are active in MDS patients, and may complement each other by targeting the bone marrow microenvironment and the malignant clone. A recent Phase I trial testing the lenalidomide and azacitidine combination yielded encouraging results; however, lenalidomide’s contribution was unclear. In this study, 18 higher-risk MDS patients were treated with the combination for seven cycles, after which lenalidomide was discontinued in eight patients who achieved a complete response, with azacitidine monotherapy continuing until disease progression. We report on three patients who relapsed on monotherapy with excess blasts at 12, 19, and 24 months, in whom lenalidomide was then resumed in combination with azacitidine. Each patient, one with normal cytogenetics at relapse; one with a 18 abnormality; and one with del(4q25), recaptured a complete response that was sustained for 5, 7, and 7+ months. We conclude that the addition of lenalidomide to azacitidine provides additional clinical benefit over azacitidine monotherapy.     

Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first remission: routine positron emission tomography/computerized tomography imaging is not superior to clinical follow‐up for patients with no residual mass

There is no consensus regarding optimal follow‐up mode for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients that achieve complete remission following chemotherapy or combined chemo‐ and radiation therapy. Several studies demonstrated high sensitivity of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in detecting disease progression; however, these techniques are currently not recommended for routine follow‐up. This retrospective study conducted in two Israeli (N = 291) and one New Zealand academic centres (N = 77), compared a group of HL patients, followed‐up with routine imaging every 6 months during the first 2 years after achieving remission, once in the third year, with additional dedicated studies performed due to symptoms or physical findings (Group I) to a group of patients without residual masses who underwent clinically‐based surveillance with dedicated imaging upon relapse suspicion (Group II). Five‐year overall survival (OS) was 94% and median time to relapse was 8·6 months for both modes. Relapse rates in Groups I and II were 13% and 9%, respectively. During the first 3 years of follow‐up, 47·5 and 4·7 studies were performed per detected relapse in Groups I and II, respectively. The current study demonstrated no benefit in either progression‐free survival (PFS) or OS in HL patients followed by routine imaging versus clinical follow‐up. The cost was 10 times higher for routine imaging.