Partial depletion of tissue factor pathway inhibitor during subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin, but not with two low molecular weight heparins

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is released to circulating blood after intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of heparins, and may thus contribute to the antithrombotic effect of heparins. We have recently shown that total TFPI activity, plasma free TFPI antigen, and heparin releasable TFPI were partially depleted during repeated and continuous i.v. infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH), but not during s.c. treatment with a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The difference may be attributed to a different mode of action or the different mode of administration. In the present randomized cross-over study, s.c. administration of therapeutic doses of UFH was compared with s.c. administration of two LMWHs. 12 healthy male volunteers were treated for 3 d with UFH, 250 U/kg twice daily, dalteparin, 200 U/kg once daily, and enoxaparin, 1.5 mg/kg once daily. Six participants were also treated with UFH, 300 U/kg once daily. On day 5 a single dose of either drug was given. Peak levels of total TFPI activity and free TFPI antigen were detected 1 h after injection, whereas maximal prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and peak levels of anti-factor Xa activity and anti-factor IIa activity were detected after 4 h. On UFH administered twice daily, free TFPI antigen decreased by 44% from baseline level before the first injection on day 1 to pre-injection level on day 5. On UFH administered once daily, basal free TFPI antigen decreased by 50%, 56% and 27% on day 2, 3 and 5 respectively, compared with day 1. Minimal depletion of TFPI was detected during treatment with LMWHs. The study demonstrates the different modes of action of LMWHs and UFH and may help to explain the superior antithrombotic efficacy of LMWHs.     

Physiological function of tissue factor pathway inhibitor and interaction with heparins

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is now recognized as a major physiological anticoagulant. Its main role is to modulate factor VIIa/tissue factor catalytic activity. Another important role is to potentiate the effect of heparins. TFPI is released from the vascular endothelium after injection of either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), which may then provide high concentrations of TFPI at sites of tissue damage and ongoing thrombosis. In dilute prothrombin-time-based assays, released TFPI contributes approximately one-third to the anticoagulant effect of heparin, the remaining being accounted for by antithrombin. Released TFPI, but not plasma TFPI, contains the basic carboxy-terminal tail which is important for the anticoagulant effect. UFH and LMWH exert differential effects on intravascular TFPI. UFH, but not LMWH, given in therapeutic doses, is associated with a progressive depletion of TFPI, which is associated with a strong rebound activation of coagulation after cessation of treatment. Such depletion may explain the apparent superior efficacy of LMWH observed in clinical trials.     

Development of a recombinant antithrombin variant as a potent antidote to fondaparinux and other heparin derivatives

Heparin derivative-based therapy has evolved from unfractionated heparin (UFH) to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and now fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide. Contrary to UFH or LMWHs, fondaparinux is not neutralized by protamine sulfate, and no antidote is available to counteract bleeding disorders associated with overdosing. To make the use of fondaparinux safer, we developed an antithrombin (AT) variant as a potent antidote to heparin derivatives. This variant (AT-N135Q-Pro394) combines 2 mutations: substitution of Asn135 by a Gln to remove a glycosylation site and increase affinity for heparins, and the insertion of a Pro between Arg393 and Ser394 to abolish its anticoagulant activity. As expected, AT-N135Q-Pro394 anticoagulant activity was almost abolished, and it exhibited a 3-fold increase in fondaparinux affinity. AT-N135Q-Pro394 was shown to reverse fondaparinux overdosing in vitro in a dose-dependent manner through a competitive process with plasma AT for fondaparinux binding. This antidote effect was also observed in vivo: administration of AT-N135Q-Pro394 in 2.5-fold molar excess versus plasma AT neutralized 86% of the anti-Xa activity within 5 minutes in mice treated with fondaparinux. These results clearly demonstrate that AT-N135Q-Pro394 can reverse the anticoagulant activity of fondaparinux and thus could be used as an antidote for this drug.     

Effects of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins on plasma levels of hemostatic factors in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin (low molecular weight heparin) constitute fundamental therapies in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Since enoxaparin appears to offer clinical advantages over UFH in managing ACS, markers of thrombin generation, endothelial function and acute phase response could manifest different responses to UFH or enoxaparin. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect that treatment with either UFH or enoxaparin has on plasma hemostatic markers in 24 patients with ACS. DESIGN AND METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive 5,000 IU intravenous bolus and continuous infusion of 18 IU/Kg/h UFH (n=11) or 1 mg/kg/12h subcutaneous enoxaparin (n=13). The plasma levels of fibrinogen (Fg), prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), thrombin antithrombin complex (TAT), von Willebrand factor (vWF), tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) were assayed at admission and 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after heparin treatment. RESULTS: Upon admission, UFH and enoxaparin patients showed a significant increase in all the hemostatic parameters measured with respect to the levels in the control subjects. In comparison with the baseline levels of the UFH- and enoxaparin-treated patients, Fg showed a significant increase at 48 h and TFPI at 6, 12 and 24 hours. However, at 48 hours TFPI levels were not significantly higher than the basal values. There were no significant changes in F1+2, TAT, vWF or TF. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Markers of thrombin generation, endothelial function and acute-phase reactants manifest a similar response to UFH and enoxaparin. An increase in thrombin generation may be a result of persistently activated inflammatory and endothelial processes, despite UFH and enoxaparin treatment.     

Can we differentiate the low-molecular-weight heparins?

The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have a number of therapeutic advantages, relative to standard unfractionated heparin (UFH). They are readily bioavailable when injected subcutaneously and can be given in fixed doses, allowing for far simpler administration. Several LMWHs are now commercially available, each demonstrating different physical and chemical properties and different activities in animal models of anticoagulation or hemorrhage. In clinical comparisons with placebo in the treatment of unstable coronary artery disease (UCAD), the LMWHs dalteparin sodium and nadroparin calcium have demonstrated good anticoagulant efficacy. In comparisons with UFH, on the other hand, only enoxaparin has shown superior anticoagulant activity, as reported in the results of the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B trials. However, close scrutiny of the methodology of the clinical trials in UCAD reveals considerable differences in study designs, dosage regimens, duration of administration of active treatments, and the timing and definition of endpoints. Therefore, it would not be scientifically sound to compare results with the different LMWHs based on the current available studies. It is also not possible to draw any conclusions with regard to the relative efficacy of the different LMWHs, since there are no properly-sized comparative data between dalteparin sodium, enoxaparin sodium, and nadroparin calcium.     

Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparins in Thrombosis and Cancer: Emerging Links

Heparin as well as low‐molecular‐weight heparins (LMWHs) have polypharmacological actions at various levels. Earlier studies focused on the plasma anti‐Xa and anti‐IIa pharmacodynamics (PD) for the different LMWHs. Other important PD parameters for heparin and LMWHs might explain the diverse clinical impacts of this class of agents in thrombosis and beyond: the release of the vascular tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), inhibition of key matrix‐degrading enzymes, and other mechanisms. There is much evidence for the key role of LMWHs in hypercoagulation in thrombosis and cancer, angiogenesis, and inflammatory disorders. Many cancer patients reportedly have a hypercoaguable state, with recurrent thrombosis due to the impact of cancer cells and chemotherapy or radiotherapy on the coagulation cascade. Studies have demonstrated that unfractionated heparin (UFH) or its low molecular weight fractions interfere with various processes involved in tumor growth and metastasis. Clinical trials have suggested a clinically relevant and improved efficacy of LMWHs, as compared to UFH, on the survival of cancer patients with deep vein thrombosis. Our laboratory has demonstrated a significant role for LMWHs and for LMWH‐releasable TFPI on the regulation of angiogenesis, tumor growth, and tumor metastasis; we have also seen potent inhibition of matrix‐degrading enzymes by LMWHs but not by TFPI. The antiangiogenesis effect of LMWHs or non‐anticoagulant LMWH derivatives was shown to be reversed by anti‐TFPI. Thus, modulation of tissue factor/Vila noncoagulant activities by LMWH‐releasable TFPI and the inhibitory effects on matrix‐degrading enzymes beside the anticoagulant efficacy have provided an expanded clinical utility for LMWHs in angiogenesis‐associated disorders, including human tumor growth and metastasis.     

Use of Anticoagulants in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients; A Focus on Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

INTRODUCTION: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but given logistics, many patients are still managed with thrombolytics. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is recommended for routine use in STEMI patients treated with thrombolytics. However, other anticoagulants have been evaluated for use in STEMI patients treated with thrombolysis, including the low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs, enoxaparin, dalteparin, and reviparin), fondaparinux and bivalirudin. METHODS AND RESULTS: A review of the available randomized controlled study data shows that most evidence, in terms of number of trials and number of patients treated with anticoagulants in STEMI has accumulated for LMWHs. The use of enoxaparin and reviparin improves hard clinical efficacy endpoints although there is an excess of bleeding events. Trials with dalteparin have failed to demonstrate improvement in hard clinical efficacy endpoints compared with UFH. Enoxaparin is currently the only LMWH with FDA approval for use in STEMI patients and should be considered as a preferable alternative to UFH in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis.     

Comparison of effects on markers of blood cell activation of enoxaparin,dalteparin, and unfractionated heparin in patients with unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (the ARMADA study)

The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) enoxaparin and dalteparin have shown superior and equivalent efficacy, respectively, over unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study aimed to identify markers of blood cell activation that are independent predictors of outcomes at 1 month and to compare the effects of enoxaparin, dalteparin, and UFH on any such markers. In this multicenter, prospective, open-label study, 141 patients with UAP or NSTEMI were randomized to treatment for 48 to 120 hours with enoxaparin (n = 46), dalteparin (n = 48), or UFH (n = 47). Blood samples were taken at the time of randomization and after > or =48 hours of treatment but before catheterization. Multivariate analysis identified increased plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and decreased platelet levels of glycoprotein Ib/IX complexes as independent predictors of 1-month adverse outcome (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and recurrent ischemia). vWF release was strongly related to and may have been released by inflammation as measured by C-reactive protein. Both LMWHs reduced the release of vWF in plasma (as well as C-reactive protein) compared with UFH. Enoxaparin had a more favorable effect on glycoprotein Ib/IX complexes than either dalteparin or UFH. The incidence of the composite clinical efficacy end point was: 13% (enoxaparin), 19% (dalteparin), and 28% (UFH). vWF and its receptor glycoprotein Ib/IX play a key role in acute coronary syndromes. vWF is linked to inflammation and, like glycoprotein Ib/IX, is affected more favorably by the LWMHs than by UFH.     

Is the use of unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome outmoded?

Because of the key role of thrombin in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the appropriate selection of antithrombotic therapy is important. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the agent of choice for decades. Unfortunately, UFH has a number of limitations related to its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are attractive alternatives to UFH for several reasons, including predictable anticoagulation and ease of administration. Two LMWHs (dalteparin and enoxaparin) have been approved as alternatives to UFH in patients presenting with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Randomized, controlled trials, in addition to open-label series, indicate that LMWH can safely be the agent of choice with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in the medical and upstream management of patients with ACS. Although the data are not definitive, several trials suggest that given intravenously, enoxaparin is safe as the sole antithrombotic agent in the catheterization laboratory.     

The activated clotting time (ACT) can be used to monitor enoxaparin and dalteparin after intravenous administration

BACKGROUND: The use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the dose-response of enoxaparin, dalteparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT or aPTT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). METHODS: A total of 130 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were assigned to intravenous enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg, dalteparin 50 international units/kg or UFH 50 units/kg. Of the 130 patients, 46 (35%) underwent PCI, all of whom received a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We measured ACT, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and plasma anti-Xa levels after serial sampling. RESULTS: Both enoxaparin and dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT and aPTT, with an ACT dose-response approximately one-half the magnitude of that obtained using UFH. The time course of changes in the ACT and aPTT after administration of enoxaparin and dalteparin was virtually identical, with a return to baseline at approximately 2 hours. The enoxaparin and dalteparin-treated patients successfully underwent PCI with no major hemorrhagic complications. CONCLUSIONS: The ACT is equally sensitive to IV enoxaparin and dalteparin. These data support an ACT-guided strategy for intravenously administered LMWH during PCI. Additional studies with larger patient populations may be indicated to determine the ideal target ACT for LMWH in PCI.     

The activated clotting time can be used to monitor the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin after intravenous administration

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the dose response of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) dalteparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during PCI has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays. METHODS: This study was performed in three phases. In vitro, ACTs were measured on volunteer (n = 10) blood samples spiked with increasing concentrations of dalteparin or UFH. To extend these observations in vivo, ACTs were then measured in patients (n = 15) who were sequentially treated with IV dalteparin and then UFH. Finally, a larger monitoring study was undertaken involving patients (n = 110) who received dalteparin 60 or 80 international U (IU)/kg alone or followed by abciximab. We measured ACT (Hemochron), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa levels, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) concentration, and plasma dalteparin concentration. RESULTS: Dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT with a smaller degree of variance as compared to UFH. Five min after administration of IV dalteparin 80 IU/kg the ACT increased from 125 s (122 s, 129 s) to 184 s (176 s, 191 s) (p < 0.001). The aPTT, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities, and TFPI concentration also demonstrated significant increases following IV dalteparin. CONCLUSIONS: The ACT and aPTT are sensitive to IV dalteparin at clinically relevant doses. These data suggest that the ACT may be useful in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of intravenously administered dalteparin during PCI.     

Conjectures and refutations on the mode of action of heparins. The limited importance of anti-factor xa activity as a pharmaceutical mechanism and a yardstick for therapy

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), like unfractionated heparin (UFH), exert their action primarily by accelerating the interaction between antithrombin (AT) and thrombin. At the levels of aXa activity that are attained in human pharmacology, it does not cause significant (>15%) inhibition of the clotting system. The essential differences between LMWHs and UFH are: (a) LMWHs attain higher plasma concentrations after subcutaneous injection (high bioavailability), and (b) in contrast to LMWHs, UFH contains very large heparin molecules with a putative hemorrhagic action. The reputedly higher aXa activity of LMWH can be shown to be largely due to the absence of Ca(2+) using the current laboratory methods to estimate this activity. Via this artifact the apparently high aXa activity of LMWHs is correlated but not related to their favorable pharmacokinetic properties. Consequently dosage guidelines for the use of different LMWHs cannot be based upon their aXa activity. Until better laboratory methods are available, clinical results are the only reliable guideline to heparin dosage.     

Perspectives on the Long Term Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists used widely in the medical treatment of acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary interventions, prevent fibrinogen cross-linking and platelet aggregation, critical initiating steps in arterial thrombosis. Their anticoagulant properties, particularly when administered conjunctively with heparin preparations, are less well-characterized. In a series of in vitro studies, increasing concentrations of abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide either alone or in combination with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or fractionated heparin (enoxaparin) were added to washed platelets suspended in Tyrode's buffer. Following platelet activation and prothrombinase assembly, thrombin generation was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). There was a concentration-dependent reduction in platelet-dependent thrombin generation with each of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. The combination of tirofiban and UFH yielded percent, absolute and relative reductions (compared with tirofiban alone) of 48.0%, 16.9%, and 35.2%, respectively. The corresponding values for eptifibatide and abciximab were 38.0%, 13.5%, 35.5%, and 55.1%, 3.8%, 8.4%, respectively. Thrombin generation was decreased by an additional 2 to 3% (absolute reduction) with high concentrations of enoxaparin in combination with either eptifibatide or abciximab. Platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, beyond their ability to prevent fibrinogen-mediated aggregation, inhibit platelet-dependent prothrombinase activity and thrombin generation in a concentration-dependent manner. Heparin facilitates the existing anticoagulant properties, supporting combination therapy in clinical practice. The potential added benefit of fractionated heparin over UFH will require further investigation.     

Comparison of anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory responses using enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

The Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) II study compared enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin (UFH) as bridging therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation >2 days in duration who underwent transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion. In the present study, the anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory effects of enoxaparin and UFH were compared at prespecified time points. In a randomized substudy of 155 patients from 17 clinical sites, the anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin (n = 76) was compared with that of UFH (n = 79). Blood samples were drawn at enrollment, on day 2, and on day 4 in the 2 groups. Blood samples were evaluated for anticoagulant activity by measuring the activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-Xa, anti-IIa, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor levels. In addition, levels of coagulation activation (by thrombin antithrombin complex) and inflammation (by highly sensitive C-reactive protein) were measured. The results of this substudy showed that the anti-Xa levels in the 2 groups increased on day 2. Similar increases in anti-Xa were observed on day 4. The anti-Xa levels and tissue factor pathway inhibitor levels were higher in the enoxaparin group compared with the UFH group on days 2 and 4. However, as expected, the anti-IIa levels in the UFH group were higher. In addition, markers of coagulation activation and inflammation were increased in patients with atrial fibrillation. Treatment with enoxaparin significantly decreased thrombin antithrombin complex levels compared with treatment with UFH. Highly sensitive C-reactive protein levels were also decreased after treatment in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the ACUTE II study showed that the use of enoxaparin for bridging therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion resulted in a more predictable and stronger anticoagulant response than that observed with UFH. Markers of inflammation were also decreased in the 2 groups.     

Differential effect of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin on intravascular tissue factor pathway inhibitor: evidence for a difference in antithrombotic action

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is a potent inhibitor of tissue factor (TF)-induced blood coagulation, which is increased several-fold in post-heparin plasma and thought to contribute significantly to the antithrombotic action of heparin. In the present study we investigated whether subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, had a different effect on intravascular pools of TFPI compared with continuous i.v. infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH). 18 healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to continuous i.v. infusion with UFH (initially 450 U/kg/24 h, n  = 6) or to s.c. treatment with LMWH once daily (enoxaparin, 1.5 mg/kg, n  = 12) for 72 h. A bolus injection of 5000 IU UFH i.v. caused an 8–13-fold increase in plasma-free TFPI antigen (TFPI Ag), followed by a progressive decrease (81 ± 4%, P  < 0.001) during the 72 h infusion with UFH. 4 h after discontinuation of the infusion, basal free TFPI Ag and heparin-releasable TFPI were significantly decreased compared with the concentrations before the infusion (30 ± 9% and 27 ± 7%, respectively). In contrast, LMWH treatment did not reduce either basal or heparin-releasable TFPI Ag. The changes in plasma TFPI Ag by UFH and LMWH were statistically different between groups both in pre- ( P  < 0.001) and post-heparin ( P  < 0.0001) plasma. The differential effect of UFH and LMWH on intravascular pools of TFPI may contribute to the understanding of the apparent superior efficacy of LMWHs in the treatment of both arterial and venous thrombosis.     

Pharmacodynamic considerations in the selection of dosage of tinzaparin for various indications: experimental studies in primates

Like unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are polypharmacologic agents that can modulate the hemostatic system at multiple points. Thus, to select an optimal dose of LMWH for a given indication, it is necessary to consider multiple actions of the drug. In this study, nonhuman primates were treated with intravenous or subcutaneous boluses of the LMWH tinzaparin or UFH. Doses were selected on the basis of the expected prophylactic (75 U/kg) and therapeutic (175 U/kg) dosing of tinzaparin. Blood samples were drawn periodically up to 24 hours after administration. Circulating anti-Xa and anti-thrombin (anti-IIa) activities determined using amidolytic assays were used to estimate plasma tinzaparin (heparin) concentrations. In addition, total tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) levels were measured in these primates. Subcutaneous administration of 75 U/kg tinzaparin resulted in plasma levels of approximately 0.2 to 0.3 U/mL, concentrations sufficient for DVT prophylaxis. Such drug levels were not associated with a significant release of TFPI. Intravenous administration of the same dose resulted in a peak drug level of approximately 1.5 anti-Xa U/mL. The elimination half-life was approximately 1 hour. Thus, intravenously administered tinzaparin may be useful for providing anticoagulation during coronary interventions. Subcutaneous administration of 175 U/kg resulted in tinzaparin levels of approximately 0.7 anti-Xa U/mL and a significant increase in TFPI levels. Interestingly, the increase in TFPI levels occurred over a different time frame than anticoagulant activity. Intravenous administration of 175 U/kg resulted in peak drug concentrations of almost 5 anti-Xa U/mL. The pharmacokinetic behavior of intravenously administered tinzaparin was comparable to that of UFH. The data show that the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects measured using different assays widely differ. For a proper pharmacodynamic analysis, multiple assays should be considered, given that both UFH and LMWHs are polycomponent in nature.     

Pharmacologic modulation of thrombin generation associated with human clots by human purified antithrombin alone or in the presence of low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin.

Procoagulant activities associated with human clots may contribute to thrombus extension. We investigate the inhibition of clot-associated factor Xa and thrombin activities by purified human antithrombin either alone or as combination with a low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) as compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). The standard clots were prepared by recalcification of frozen platelet-poor human plasma. Clot-associated thrombin was measured on the clot after clot incubation in recalcified buffer or recalcified prothrombin solution. The enzymatic reaction was measured using a specific substrate for thrombin (CBS 3447). The thrombin concentration was determined both on the clots and in the reaction mixtures. In parallel, prothrombin fragment 1.2 and thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods. We demonstrated that in the presence of purified human prothrombin and antithrombin (AT), a partial inhibition of clot associated thrombin activity correlated with an increase of TAT complexes. However, antithrombin was unable to inhibit thrombin generation induced by the clot-associated factor Xa. Enoxaparin (low molecular weight heparin) and UFH did not enhance clot-bound thrombin inhibition induced by AT. We conclude that clot-bound thrombin is accessible to human antithrombin alone. AT is also able to inhibit thrombin generated by factor Xa-associated clot. However, neither a low molecular weight heparin or UFH enhanced the effect of AT alone.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of a medium-molecular-weight heparin in comparison with UFH and LMWH

Despite the well-established medical use of heparins, the question arises whether the efficacy-safety ratio of the available heparins can still be improved. Therefore, a medium-molecular-weight heparin (MMWH), a new heparin with an average molecular weight of 10.5 kDa and a narrow molecular weight range (9.5 to 11.5 kDa) was developed. Its in vitro activities amount to 174.9 anti-factor Xa (aXa) U/mg and 170.0 antithrombin (aIIa) U/mg. In the presented randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MMWH are compared with those of an unfractionated heparin (UFH) and a low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH; enoxaparin). After subcutaneous administration of 9000 aXa-U of either heparin in 16 volunteers, the prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the aXa activity, and the aIIa activities were determined at 11 time points spread over 24 hours after injection. The ex vivo analysis revealed striking pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between the three heparins. UFH had the lowest bioavailability regarding the aPTT, aXa, and aIIa activities. Enoxaparin exhibited only low aIIa activity but the highest aXa activity. Unlike UFH and enoxaparin, MMWH showed a high recovery of aIIa activity, which suggests that it combines the high potency to inhibit thrombin that characterizes UFH with the high bioavailability of the LMWHs. Consequently, substantially lower doses are needed to bring about effects comparable to those of UFH and LMWH.     

Determination of the levels of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins in plasma: their effect on thrombin-mediated feedback reactions in vivo. Preliminary results after subcutaneous injection.

We define a standard independent unit (SIU) of heparin as that amount that, in plasma containing 1 mumol of ATIII, raises the (pseudo-)first-order breakdown constant of factor Xa by 1 min-1. These units measure all material with a high affinity for ATIII (HAM); only material above the critical chain length of 17 monosaccharide units (above critical chain length material; ACLM) catalyzes the inactivation of thrombin. An SIU of ACLM is therefore analogously defined as the amount that, in plasma containing 1 mumol of ATIII, will raise the (pseudo-)first-order breakdown constant of thrombin by 1 min-1. Of any given heparin preparation one can determine the specific HAM and ACLM activities in terms of SIU/mg. On the basis of the factor Xa and thrombin breakdown constants found in a plasma sample one can then determine the levels of HAM and ACLM. Preliminary experiments were carried out in plasma samples obtained after subcutaneous injection of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and of two types of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). About three times more of UFH activity than of LMWH activity has to be injected to obtain the same levels of ACLM in the plasma. Only with the LMWHs significant amounts of BCLM are found, which rises higher and persists longer than the ACLM. We determined the course of thrombin generation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and in platelet-poor plasma (PPP), as well as in the PPP factor Xa generation curve and the course of prothrombin conversion. The observed inhibitions correlated much better with the levels of ACLM than with those of below critical chain length material. The difference between UFH and LMWHs can therefore not be explained in terms of antithrombin and anti-factor-Xa activity. The essential difference between UFH and LMWH appears in the feedback effect of thrombin in PRP, where thrombin generation is both inhibited and retarded by LMWH, while it is only retarded but hardly inhibited by UFH.     

Determination of antithrombin-dependent factor Xa inhibitors by prothrombin-induced clotting time

Prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) determines the anticoagulant effects of heparins, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), and direct thrombin inhibitors. At present, this is the only method that measures the effects of all of these inhibitors, in contrast to the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), Heptest, ecarin clotting time, and the chromogenic assays. The antithrombin-dependent direct factor (F) Xa inhibitors fondaparinux and idraparinux were compared with the LMWH dalteparin on PiCT, aPTT, Heptest, and chromogenic anti-FXa assays in pooled human normal plasma samples. Fondaparinux and idraparinux prolonged the coagulation times in the PiCT, Heptest, and chromogenic FXa assays in a dose-dependent manner, in contrast to the aPTT. We conclude that PiCT is a suitable assay to determine the anticoagulant effects of these two new FXa inhibitors in patients receiving treatment with these compounds.