Pathophysiology of portal hypertension.

Portal hypertension is characterized by a pathologic increase in portal venous pressure that leads to the formation of an extensive network of portosystemic collaterals that divert a large fraction of portal blood to the systemic circulation, bypassing the liver. Experimental models have improved understanding of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension. It is now clear that an increased vascular resistance to portal blood flow is the initial factor responsible for the increase in portal pressure. This resistance is exerted along the hepatic and portal-collateral circulation and is in part modifiable by pharmacologic agents. In a latter stage, an increased portal venous blood inflow, promoted by splanchnic vasodilation, contributes to maintenance and aggravation of portal hypertension. Humoral vasodilatory agents play an important role in the splanchnic vasodilation. Several vasodilators are likely to be involved, including glucagon, prostacyclin, endotoxins, and nitric oxide. The splanchnic vasodilation is associated with a hyperkinetic systemic circulation, with reduced arterial pressure and peripheral resistance and increased cardiac output. The splanchnic circulation is probably the vascular territory in which the vasodilation is more pronounced. Therefore, splanchnic and systemic vasodilation probably share some pathophysiologic events. An expanded plasma volume is observed in all forms of portal hypertension. Expansion of plasma volume is due to renal sodium retention, which has been shown to precede the increase in cardiac output and can be prevented or reversed by sodium restriction and spironolactone. The expanded blood volume represents another mechanism that contributes to further increases in portal pressure.     

Restructuring of the vascular bed in response to hemodynamic disturbances in portal hypertension

In recent years, defined progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of hemodynamic disturbances occurring in liver cirrhosis, which are based on portal hypertension. In addition to pathophysiological disorders related to endothelial dysfunction, it was revealed: There is the restructuring of the vasculature, which includes vascular remodeling and angiogenesis. In spite of the fact that these changes are the compensatory-adaptive response to the deteriorating conditions of blood circulation, taken together, they contribute to the development and progression of portal hypertension causing severe complications such as bleeding from esophageal varices. Disruption of systemic and organ hemodynamics and the formation of portosystemic collaterals in portal hypertension commence with neovascularization and splanchnic vasodilation due to the hypoxia of the small intestine mucosa. In this regard, the goal of comprehensive treatment may be to influence on the chemokines, proinflammatory cytokines, and angiogenic factors(vascular endothelial growth factor, placental growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and others) that lead to the development of these disorders. This review is to describe the mechanisms of restructuring of the vascular bed in response to hemodynamic disturbances in portal hypertension. Development of pathogenetic methods, which allow correcting portal hypertension, will improve the efficiency of conservative therapy aimed at prevention and treatment of its inherent complications.     

Molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of cirrhotic portal hypertension: focus on nitric oxide

Abstract   Portal hypertension occurs because of increased intrahepatic resistance in addition to increased portal venous inflow. Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous molecule implicated in several of the vascular derangements that characterize and contribute to portal hypertension and this will be the focus of this review article. In the intrahepatic circulation, NO bioavailability is diminished due to defects in endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) regulation that contribute to increased intrahepatic resistance. NO bioavailability is increased in the splanchnic and systemic circulation because of increased eNOS protein expression and eNOS enzyme activation, which contributes to splanchnic vasodilation and increased portal venous inflow. Therapies to modulate NO bioavailability in portal hypertension are under investigation in humans and animal models.     

Role of bile acids in splanchnic hemodynamic response to chronic portal hypertension

Previous studies from our laboratory suggest that humoral factors, namely glucagon, can account for approximately 30% of the splanchnic vasodilation in rats with prehepatic portal hypertension. A reduced vascular sensitivity to norepinephrine, vasopressin, and angiotensin II may contribute to the splanchnic vasodilation. However, neither glucagon nor an altered vasoconstrictor sensitivity can fully account for the splanchnic vasodilation observed in portal hypertensive subjects. Therefore, the present study was designed to examine the role of bile acids in the splanchnic hyperemia of portal hypertension since (1) serum bile acids are elevated in portal hypertensive subjects and (2) bile acids are potent intestinal vasodilators. Prehepatic portal hypertension was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by surgical constriction of the portal vein. Ten to 14 days after the induction of portal hypertension, the enterohepatic circulation of control and portal hypertensive rats was surgically interrupted. The animals were placed in Bollman restraint cages and allowed to recover. Eighteen to 24 hr later, the rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and regional blood flow measured with radiolabeled microspheres. Normal and portal hypertensive animals without bile fistula served as controls. Plasma bile acid levels measured by radioimmunoassay were approximately 3.8 times higher in portal hypertensive animals than in control. Bile duct cannulation effectively depleted both normal and portal hypertensive animals of their circulating bile acid pool and significantly reduced portal venous inflow in portal hypertensive but not in control rats. A role for bile acids as partial mediators of the splanchnic hyperemia of portal hypertension is suggested since bile acid depletion did not completely abolish the gastrointestinal hyperemia.     

Splanchnic and systemic vasodilation: the experimental models

Experimental models are a sine qua non condition for unraveling the specific components and mechanisms contributing to vascular dysfunction and arterial vasodilation in portal hypertension. Moreover, a careful selection of the type of animal model, vascular bed, and methodology is crucial for any investigation of this issue. In this review, some critical aspects related to experimental models in portal hypertension and the techniques applied are highlighted. In addition, a detailed summary of the mechanisms of arterial vasodilation in portal hypertension is presented. First, humoral and endothelial vasodilators, predominantly nitric oxide but also carbon monoxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, and others are discussed. Second, time course and potential stimuli triggering and/or perpetuating splanchnic vasodilation are delineated. Finally, a brief general overview of vascular smooth muscle signaling sets the stage for a discussion on cotransmission, receptor desensitization, and the observed impairment in vasoconstrictor-induced smooth muscle contraction in the splanchnic and systemic circulation during portal hypertension.     

Mechanisms of ascites formation

Ascites is the most common complication of cirrhosis. It is associated with profound changes in the splanchnic and systemic circulation and with renal abnormalities. The development of ascites is related to the existence of severe sinusoidal portal hypertension that causes marked splanchnic arterial vasodilation and a forward increase in the splanchnic production of lymph. Splanchnic arterial vasodilation also produces arterial vascular underfilling, arterial hypotension, compensatory activation of the RAAS, SNS, and AVP, and a continuous sodium and water retention, leading to ascites formation. Now, therefore, the splanchnic arterial circulation, rather than the venous portal system, is believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of ascites formation.     

Modulation of the hyperdynamic circulation of cirrhotic rats by nitric oxide inhibition.

The effects of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) biosynthesis on the splanchnic and systemic circulation, were investigated in rats with cirrhosis induced by carbon tetrachloride. Portal hypertension in these rats was accompanied by decreased arterial blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance as well as by splanchnic vasodilation with increased portal venous inflow and decreased splanchnic resistance. Intravenous bolus administration of L-NMMA (25 mg/kg) significantly increased systemic blood pressure and decreased cardiac output. L-NMMA also significantly increased systemic and splanchnic vascular resistance; whereas blood flow to the stomach, small intestine, colon, pancreas, mesentery, spleen, and kidney was decreased significantly. L-NMMA did not alter the portal pressure or portosystemic shunting in these cirrhotic rats, yet portal vascular resistance increased, suggesting effects on the intrahepatic and collateral circulation. Pretreatment with L-arginine (300 mg/kg) prevented the hemodynamic changes induced by L-NMMA. These findings support the concept that local excess formation of NO contributes to changes in splanchnic circulation associated with portal hypertension in cirrhosis.     

Increased neuronal nitric oxide synthase interaction with soluble guanylate cyclase contributes to the splanchnic arterial vasodilation in portal hypertensive rats

Splanchnic arterial vasodilation represents the pathophysiological hallmark of the hemodynamic dysfunction observed in portal hypertensive states. The role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the splanchnic arterial vasodilation remains to be elucidated. We therefore investigated: (i) if nNOS is involved in the splanchnic arterial vasodilation; and (ii) the possible interaction of nNOS with soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) in superior mesenteric arterial (SMA) beds in portal hypertensive rats. Portal hypertension was induced by partial portal vein ligation (PVL). To determine the role of nNOS, we removed endothelial layer and measured contractile response and nitric oxide (NO) release in the presence or absence of 7-nitroindazole (7-NI, 10 muM), an nNOS-specific inhibitor. In endothelium-removed vessels, nNOS inhibitor significantly increased the contractile response to methoxamine in SMA beds isolated from the portal hypertensive rats, compared to non-treated SMA beds (106.8 +/- 10.7 vs 86.8 +/- 7.2 mmHg, P = 0.003). This effect of nNOS inhibitor was accompanied with decreased NO production in SMA of portal hypertensive rats (321.3 +/- 18.6 vs 139.5 +/- 16.9 pmol/mL/min, P = 0.0001). Unlike endothelial NOS that is located in endothelial cells, nNOS protein is highly expressed in smooth muscle layers of SMA. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in ~90 kDa nNOS protein in the portal hypertensive group, compared to the sham-operated group (P < 0.01). Interestingly, this 90 kDa nNOS was coimmunoprecipitated with sGC. In conclusion, increased nNOS expression in smooth muscle layers of arteries in the splanchnic circulation may be an additional and more efficient pathway for the activation of sGC by NO, which sustains arterial vasodilation.     

Enhanced Y1-receptor-mediated vasoconstrictive action of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in superior mesenteric arteries in portal hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vascular hyporeactivity to catecholamines contributes to arterial vasodilation and hemodynamic dysregulation in portal hypertension. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a sympathetic neurotransmitter facilitating adrenergic vasoconstriction via Y1-receptors on the vascular smooth muscle. Therefore, we investigated its role for vascular reactivity in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) of portal vein ligated (PVL) and sham operated rats. METHODS: In vitro perfused SMA vascular beds of rats were tested for the cumulative dose-response to NPY dependent on the presence and level of alpha1-adrenergic vascular tone (methoxamine MT: 0.3-10 microM). Moreover, the effect of NPY (50 nM) on vascular responsiveness to alpha1-adrenergic stimulation (MT: 0.3-300 microM) was evaluated. Y1-receptor function was tested by Y1-selective inhibition using BIBP-3226 (1 microM). RESULTS: NPY dose-dependently and endothelium-independently enhanced MT-pre-constriction in SMA. This potentiation was increasingly effective with increasing adrenergic pre-stimulation and being more pronounced in PVL rats as compared to sham rats at high MT concentrations. NPY enhanced vascular contractility only in PVL rats correcting the adrenergic vascular hyporeactivity. Y1-receptor inhibition completely abolished NPY-evoked vasoconstrictive effects. CONCLUSIONS: NPY endothelium-independently potentiates adrenergic vasoconstriction via Y1-receptors being more pronounced in portal hypertension improving mesenteric vascular contractility and thereby correcting the splanchnic vascular hyporeactivity. This makes NPY a superior vasoconstrictor counterbalancing arterial vasodilation in portal hypertension.     

Glucagon hinders the effects of somatostatin on portal hypertension. A study in rats with partial portal vein ligation.

Whether the decrease of portal venous inflow and portal pressure induced by somatostatin is related to the effects of somatostatin in inhibiting the secretion of glucagon and other vasodilatory peptides that are increased in portal hypertension was investigated in the current study. Splanchnic vascular resistance and splanchnic blood flow were determined using radioactive microspheres in rats with portal hypertension caused by partial portal vein ligation. Somatostatin infusion significantly decreased portal pressure (from 13.1 +/- 1.9 to 12.1 +/- 2.2 mm Hg; P less than 0.05). This was associated with a significant decrease in portal venous inflow caused by splanchnic vasoconstriction, as evidenced by increased splanchnic vascular resistance, and with a marked suppression of glucagon secretion. The simultaneous infusion of somatostatin and glucagon (2.8 ng/min, a dose that prevented any decrease in circulating glucagon levels) abolished all the hemodynamic effects of somatostatin. This effect seems to be specific because no hemodynamic changes were noted in portal hypertensive rats receiving only the glucagon infusion.     

Endothelial dysfunction in the regulation of cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is caused by an increased intrahepatic resistance, a major consequence of cirrhosis. Endothelial dysfunction in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) decreases the production of vasodilators, such as nitric oxide, and favours vasoconstriction. This contributes to an increased vascular resistance in the intrahepatic/sinusoidal microcirculation and develops portal hypertension. Portal hypertension, in turn, causes endothelial dysfunction in the extrahepatic, i.e. splanchnic and systemic, circulation. Unlike dysfunction in LSECs, endothelial dysfunction in the splanchnic and systemic circulation causes overproduction of vasodilator molecules, leading to arterial vasodilation. In addition, portal hypertension leads to the formation of portosystemic collateral vessels. Both arterial vasodilation and portosystemic collateral vessel formation exacerbate portal hypertension by increasing the blood flow through the portal vein. Pathological consequences, such as oesophageal varices and ascites, result. While the sequence of pathological vascular events in cirrhosis and portal hypertension has been elucidated, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms causing endothelial dysfunctions are not yet fully understood. This review article summarizes the current cellular and molecular studies on endothelial dysfunctions found during the development of cirrhosis and portal hypertension with a focus on the intra‐ and extrahepatic circulations. The article ends by discussing the future directions of the study for endothelial dysfunction.     

Animal models of portal hypertension

INTRODUCTIONAs for all pathologic conditions, the use of animal models is of enormous importance for the study of pathophysiological disturbances of portal hypertension, since they allow comprehensive study of questions that cannot be addressed in human s…     

In vitro and in vivo vascular responses to the L-type calcium channel activator, Bay K 8644, in rats with cirrhosis

A substance which increases the entry of extracellular calcium into arterial smooth muscle may decrease cirrhosis-induced vasodilation. The aim of the present study was to measure the effects of the L-type Ca²⁺ channel activator, Bay K 8644, on the haemodynamics of rats with cirrhosis. Vascular reactivity to this substance was also investigated. Splanchnic and systemic haemodynamic responses to Bay K 8644 (50 μg/kg) were measured in cirrhotic and normal rats. Contraction induced by 0.1 μmol/L Bay K 8644 was measured in arterial rings (aorta and superior mesenteric artery) from cirrhotic and normal rats. In cirrhotic rats, Bay K 8644 significantly decreased portal pressure (15%) and portal tributary blood flow (24%), significantly increased portal territory vascular resistance (54%) and did not significantly change hepatocollateral vascular resistance. Bay K 8644 significantly increased arterial pressure (7%) and systemic vascular resistance (24%) and did not change the cardiac index. In normal rats, Bay K 8644 significantly increased vascular resistance (150%) in portal, hepatocollateral and systemic territories and significantly decreased the cardiac index (44%). Changes in portal territory, hepatocollateral and systemic vascular resistances were significantly less marked in cirrhotic than in normal rats. In rings from the aorta and superior mesenteric artery, Bay K 8644-induced contraction was significantly lower in cirrhotic than in normal rats. In conclusion, in rats with cirrhosis, Bay K 8644 administration reduced vasodilation in splanchnic and systemic arteries and did not affect hepatocollateral vascular resistance. The Bay K 8644-induced reduction in splanchnic vasodilation caused a decrease in portal hypertension. This study also shows that Bay K 8644-induced vascular contraction was less marked in cirrhotic than in normal rats, in systemic and splanchnic vascular beds.     

Mechanisms of extrahepatic vasodilation in portal hypertension

In liver cirrhosis, abnormal persistent extrahepatic vasodilation leads to hyperdynamic circulatory dysfunction which essentially contributes to portal hypertension. Since portal hypertension is a major factor in the development of complications in cirrhosis, the mechanisms underlying this vasodilation are of paramount interest. Extensive studies performed in cirrhotic patients and animals revealed that this vasodilation is associated on the one hand with enhanced formation of vasodilators, and on the other hand with vascular hyporesponsiveness to vasoconstrictors. The latter phenomenon has been termed "vascular hypocontractility". It is caused by a combination of different mechanisms and factors described in this review.     

Increased angiogenesis in portal hypertensive rats: role of nitric oxide

Systemic and especially splanchnic arterial vasodilation accompany chronic portal hypertension. Different soluble mediators causing this vasodilation have been proposed, the strongest evidence being for nitric oxide (NO). No data exist if structural vascular changes may partly account for this vasodilatory state. Here, we developed a new in vivo quantitative angiogenesis assay in the abdominal cavity and determined if: 1) portal hypertensive rats show increased angiogenesis; and 2) angiogenesis is altered by inhibiting NO formation. Portal hypertension was induced by partial portal vein ligation (PVL). Sham-operated rats served as controls (CON). During the index operation (day 0), a teflon ring filled with collagen I (Vitrogen 100) was sutured in the mesenteric cavity. After 16 days, rings were explanted, embedded in paraffin, and ingrown vessels counted using a morphometry system. The role of NO was tested by adding an antagonist of NO formation (Nomega-nitro-L-arginine [NNA], 3.3 mg/kg/d) into the drinking water. The mean number of ingrown vessels per implant was significantly higher in PVL rats compared with CON rats, i.e., 1,453 +/- 187 versus 888 +/- 116, respectively (P <.05; N = 5 per group). NNA significantly (P <.01) inhibited angiogenesis in PVL (202 +/- 124; N = 5) and in CON (174 +/- 25; N = 6) rats, respectively. In contrast, the beta-adrenergic blocker, propranolol, did not prevent angiogenesis either in PVL or CON rats in a separate set of experiments (data not shown). The conclusions drawn from this study are that: 1) rats with portal hypertension show increased angiogenesis; and 2) inhibition of NO formation significantly prevents angiogenesis in both PVL and CON rats. Therefore, splanchnic vasodilation in chronic portal hypertension may also be a result of structural changes.     

Current concepts on the pathophysiology of portal hypertension

Cirrhosis of the liver is by far the most common cause of portal hypertension in the western world. Portal hypertension is a frequent clinical syndrome, defined by a pathological increase in the portal venous pressure. When the portal pressure gradient (the difference between pressures in the portal and the inferior vena cava veins: normal value below 6 mmHg) increases above 10-12 mmHg, complications of portal hypertension can occur. Increased resistance to portal blood flow, the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension, is in great part due to morphological changes occurring in chronic liver diseases. However, more recently a graded and reversible contraction of different elements of the porto-hepatic bed have been shown to play a role modulating intrahepatic vascular resistance which provides a rationale for the intention to reduce intrahepatic resistance and portal pressure by means of pharmacological agents. The subsequent increase in portal blood flow, as a result of the arteriolar vasodilatation of the splanchnic organs, plays a contributory role maintaining and aggravating the portal hypertensive syndrome. This splanchnic arteriolar vasodilatation is a multifactorial phenomenon, which may involve neurogenic, humoral and local mechanisms.     

门静脉高压症血流动力学改变的发病机理

门静脉高压症（PHT）与肝内循环、体循环和门体侧支循环的血流动力学改变有关。肝内阻力增加和高动力循环侧支血管的扩张在门静脉高压的发病机理中起到了重要作用。不同严重程度的肝硬化均存在能广泛影响人体的血流动力学紊乱。门静脉高压和高动力循环是肝硬化患者发病和死亡的主要原因。而血管结构重塑和血管新生是治疗门静脉高压症的重要目标。     

Peculiar characteristics of portal-hepatic hemodynamics of alcoholic cirrhosis

Alcohol-related cirrhosis is a consequence of heavy and prolonged drinking. Similarly to patients with cirrhosis of other etiologies, patients with alcoholic cirrhosis develop portal hypertension and the hepatic, splanchnic and systemic hemodynamic alterations that follow. However, in alcoholic cirrhosis, some specific features can be observed. Compared to viral cirrhosis, in alcohol-related cirrhosis sinusoidal pressure is generally higher, hepatic venous pressure gradient reflects portal pressure better, the portal flow perfusing the liver is reduced despite an increase in liver weight, the prevalence of reversal portal blood flow is higher, a patent paraumbilical vein is a more common finding and signs of hyperdynamic circulations, such as an increased cardiac output and decreased systemic vascular resistance, are more pronounced. Moreover, alcohol consumption can acutely increase portal pressure and portal-collateral blood flow. Alcoholic cardiomyopathy, another pathological consequence of prolonged alcohol misuse, may contribute to the hemodynamic changes occurring in alcohol-related cirrhosis. The aim of this review was to assess the portal-hepatic changes that occur in alcohol-related cirrhosis, focusing on the differences observed in comparison with patients with viral cirrhosis. The knowledge of the specific characteristics of this pathological condition can be helpful in the management of portal hypertension and its complications in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis.     

Pathogenesis of Portal Hypertension: Extrahepatic Mechanisms

Chronic liver diseases, including hepatic cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma, are one of the commonest causes of death and liver transplantation in adults worldwide. They are accompanied by profound disturbances that are not limited to the intrahepatic circulation, but involve also the splanchnic and systemic vascular beds. These hemodynamic disturbances are responsible for the development of portal hypertension, the most frequent and severe of cirrhosis. This syndrome is characterized by a pathological increase of blood pressure in the portal vein and concomitant increases in splanchnic blood flow and portosystemic collateral vessel formation. Increased blood flow in splanchnic organs draining into the portal vein augments in turn the portal venous inflow. Such increased portal venous inflow perpetuates and exacerbates portal pressure elevation and determines the formation of ascites during chronic liver disease. In addition, portosystemic collateral vessels include the gastroesophageal varices, which are particularly prone to rupture causing massive gastroesophageal bleeding. Collateral vessels are also responsible for other major consequences of chronic liver disease, including portosystemic encephalopathy and sepsis. Extrahepatic mechanisms are clearly of major importance for disease progression and aggravation of the portal hypertensive syndrome. Accordingly, most of the therapies currently used in portal hypertension do not act inside the liver but they actually target the increased splanchnic blood flow. This paper reviews the consequences of the splanchnic circulatory abnormalities in portal hypertension and the complex signals capable of increasing vasodilatation, hyporesponsiveness to vasoconstrictors and angiogenesis in the splanchnic vascular bed and the portosystemic collateral circulation in this pathological setting.