Interferon-{alpha}, 5-FU and prednisone in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A phase II study

BACKGROUND: Due to the possibility of a synergistic effect between Interferon(IFN-     

5-Fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil plus {alpha}-interferon as treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. A randomized study

BACKGROUND:: In 1989, S. Wadler reported very promising results (76% responserate) with a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus     

A phase I trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has modest response rates to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Fixed dose rate gemcitabine infusion leads to enhanced intracellular accumulation of drug and possible augmented clinical effect. To determine the toxicity of this combination therapy in metastatic RCC, a Phase I trial was conducted. METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled in a Phase I dose escalation trial. Patients received fixed dose rate gemcitabine on Days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with capecitabine, an oral 5-FU analog, given on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled at one of two dose levels. The initial dose level produced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), including prominent palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome). A modified second dose level also resulted in DLT, precluding further study. No central nervous system (CNS) toxicity was observed in three patients with CNS metastases. Two patients demonstrated an objective partial response. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed dose rate gemcitabine in combination with capecitabine produced unacceptable toxicity in patients with advanced RCC. Further development of this schedule in RCC cannot be recommended.     

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with constant-rate floxuridine infusion plus recombinant {alpha}2b-interferon

BACKGROUND:: Floxuridine (FUDR) and     

Phase II trial with high-dose elliptinium acetate in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Sixteen patients with adult metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with elliptinium acetate, 80 mg/m2.day, for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Among the 14 patients evaluable, no objective effects were observed. The toxicity was mild and no patients experienced intravascular hemolysis.     

Phase II trial of high-dose intermittent interleukin-2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

A phase II trial of intermittent high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) was initiated to evaluate the response rate, remission duration, and toxic effects in patients with measurable metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The rIL-2 was administered as a bolus intravenous infusion at a dose level of 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 three times weekly, preceded by indomethacin (50 mg orally). Dose reductions of rIL-2 for hypotension and other grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were permitted. Forty-four patients were entered and 41 were eligible. Previous treatment included nephrectomy (23 patients), radiation therapy (seven), and hormone therapy (three). Most toxic effects observed were moderate and included nausea, vomiting, anorexia (85%); hypotension (85%); fever, chills (78%); central nervous system changes (24%); myelosuppression (27%); and creatinine elevation (15%). Four instances of grade 4 toxicity were observed and included nausea, vomiting with dehydration; hypotension; and myocardial infarction. Thirty patients (73%) required dose adjustments because of toxicity. Five responses (12%) were seen, which included one complete and four partial. Sites of response included lung, liver, and soft tissue; the duration of response ranged from 2 to 20+ months. These results demonstrate that this schedule of rIL-2 can be administered in an outpatient setting, and can produce tumor regression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including durable complete responses.     

A phase II trial of palliative radiotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has previously been described as being less responsive to radiotherapy (RT) than other tumor types. The authors conducted a prospective study to assess the effect of RT on symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic RCC. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2002, patients with symptomatic metastatic RCC were entered into a prospective study in two cancer centers. Symptomatic sites of disease were treated with 30 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions. Patients reported pain, analgesic use, symptoms, and QOL using validated questionnaires before RT, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, and every 3 months to 1 year thereafter. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (19 males and 12 females) were entered into the trial. The median age of the patients was 61 years (range, 35-81 yrs). The most common indication for RT was bone pain (n = 24). The median duration of follow-up was 4.3 months (range, 1-15 mos). Of 23 evaluable patients treated for pain, 83% (n = 19) experienced site-specific pain relief after RT, and 48% (n = 11) did not have an associated increase in analgesic medication use. The median duration of site-specific pain response was 3 months (range, 1-15 mos). The global pain response rate was only 15% (n = 3) because many patients developed other painful metastases. Global QOL was found to improve in 33% (n = 8) of the evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: A palliative radiotherapy dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions can result in a significant response rate and the relief of local symptoms in patients with bone metastases from RCC. Improvements in global pain and QOL appear to be limited by the effects of progressive systemic disease.     

A randomized phase II trial of interleukin 2 and interleukin 2-interferon alpha in advanced renal cancer.

A randomized phase II trial was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of interleukin 2 (IL-2) with an IL-2 and interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) regimen for the treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma. Sixty patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had previously undergone a nephrectomy were randomized to receive three cycles of IL-2 or IL-2 with IFN-alpha2b. Eighteen MU of IL-2 were administered subcutaneously on Mondays-Fridays for 3 weeks out of 4. Those patients randomized to receive the combination received the same regimen of IL-2 with 9 MU of IFN-alpha2b subcutaneously on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays for 3 weeks out of 4. Thirty patients were randomized to receive each arm. Twenty-nine were evaluable in each arm. Twenty-two patients received three cycles of IL-2 but only 14 patients received three cycles of IL-2/IFN-alpha because of the greater toxicity of the combination. The principal toxicities included nausea, fatigue and fever. There were no complete responses in either arm and only two patients who were treated with IL-2 attained a partial response. Twelve patients in each arm had stable disease and 15 patients in the IL-2 arm and 16 patients in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm progressed through treatment. There were no significant differences in survival. Ten patients who received IL-2 are alive with a median follow-up of 266 days, whereas six patients who received IL-2/IFN-alpha are alive after a median of 278 days. The median survival from the time of identification of metastatic disease is 444 days in the IL-2 arm and 381 days in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm. The IL-2/IFN-alpha combination is more toxic than IL-2 alone and this resulted in a reduced number of cycles of treatment. However, the median survival of the two groups was the same, suggesting that further evaluation of the IL-2/IFN-alpha combination should be confined to large prospective randomized clinical trials.     

Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The Cytokine Working Group conducted a randomized phase III trial to determine the value of outpatient interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2b (IFN) relative to high-dose (HD) IL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified for bone and liver metastases, primary tumor in place, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and then randomly assigned to receive either IL-2 (5 MIU/m(2) subcutaneously every 8 hours for three doses on day 1, then daily 5 days/wk for 4 weeks) and IFN (5 MIU/m(2) subcutaneously three times per week for 4 weeks) every 6 weeks or HD IL-2 (600,000 U/kg/dose intravenously every 8 hours on days 1 through 5 and 15 to 19 [maximum 28 doses]) every 12 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled between April 1997 and July 2000. Toxicities were as anticipated for these regimens. The response rate was 23.2% (22 of 95 patients) for HD IL-2 versus 9.9% (nine of 91 patients) for IL-2/IFN (P = .018). Ten patients receiving HD IL-2 were progression-free at 3 years versus three patients receiving IL-2 and IFN (P = .082). The median response durations were 24 and 15 [corrected] months (P = .18) [corrected] and median survivals were 17.5 and 13 months (P = .24). For patients with bone or liver metastases (P = .001) or a primary tumor in place (P = .040), survival was superior with HD IL-2. CONCLUSION: This randomized phase III trial provides additional evidence that HD IL-2 should remain the preferred therapy for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.     

A phase I/II trial of sorafenib and infliximab in advanced renal cell carcinoma

There is clinical evidence to suggest that tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) may be a therapeutic target in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Multi-targeted kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib and sunitinib, have become standard of care in advanced RCC. The anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody infliximab and sorafenib have differing cellular mechanisms of action. We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of infliximab in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced RCC. Eligible patients were systemic treatment-naive or had received previous cytokine therapy only. Sorafenib and infliximab were administered according to standard schedules. The study had two phases: in phase I, the safety and toxicity of the combination of full-dose sorafenib and two dose levels of infliximab were evaluated in three and three patients, respectively, and in phase II, further safety, toxicity and efficacy data were collected in an expanded patient population. Acceptable safety was reported for the first three patients (infliximab 5 mg kg⁻¹) in phase 1. Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and infliximab 10 mg kg⁻¹ were administered to a total of 13 patients (three in phase 1 and 10 in phase 2). Adverse events included grade 3 hand–foot syndrome (31%), rash (25%), fatigue (19%) and infection (19%). Although manageable, toxicity resulted in 75% of the patients requiring at least one dose reduction and 81% requiring at least one dose delay of sorafenib. Four patients were progression-free at 6 months (PFS₆ 31%); median PFS and overall survival were 6 and 14 months, respectively. Sorafenib and infliximab can be administered in combination, but a significant increase in the numbers of adverse events requiring dose adjustments of sorafenib was observed. There was no evidence of increased efficacy compared with sorafenib alone in advanced RCC. The combination of sorafenib and infliximab does not warrant further evaluation in patients with advanced RCC.     

Immunological effects of treatment with sequential administration of recombinant interferon gamma and alpha in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma during a phase I trial.

Many anticancer mechanisms of the interferons have been proposed but none have been associated with clinical response to date. The biological activities of the interferons in vivo have included effects upon the natural killer cell, T- and B-lymphocytes, and macrophages. This report details a prospective study of the immunological effects on peripheral blood mononuclear cells of sequentially administered recombinant (r) interferon (IFN) gamma and rIFN alpha in 28 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Natural killer cell activity, T-cell phenotype (CD4, CD8, CD56, CD16, CD4/HLA-DR, CD8/HLA-DR, CD56/HLA-DR) and 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase were measured prior to therapy, during therapy, and following completion of treatment. Statistical analysis of all parameters was performed for the entire group, by individual patient, by dosage, by time, and by clinical response. An overall significant depression in natural killer cell activity and in the percentage of circulating CD56, CD16, and CD8+ cells were noted. Significant increases in 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase and in the percentage of circulating CD4 cells were also noted. Although an association between the magnitude of change in percentage of CD16+ cells and 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase and dosage of rIFN gamma and rIFN alpha, respectively, was observed, optimal biological dose of this sequence of rIFNs could not be determined due to the limited number of patients. A decrease in the percentage of circulating CD8+ cells was observed among patients with objective clinical response (partial and complete). Sequentially administered rIFN gamma and rIFN alpha can modulate immunological parameters in vivo in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A fall in percentage of circulating CD8+ cell is associated with response and suggests that this sequence of rIFN alpha and rIFN gamma might influence T-cell mediated antitumor activity.     

A phase I trial of intermittent high-dose gefitinib and fixed-dose docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: Based on our mouse xenograft model demonstrating that intermittent high-dose gefitinib sensitizes tumors to subsequent treatment with taxanes, we initiated this phase I trial to explore docetaxel in combination with escalating doses of intermittent gefitinib (Iressa) given prior to docetaxel. METHODS: This was a phase I study where patients with advanced cancer were treated with escalating doses of gefitinib (1,000, 1,500, 2,250, 3,000 mg) on days 1 and 2 followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m2) on day 3 of a 21 day cycle. Gefitinib pharmacokinetic data were obtained on days 1, 2, and 3 of cycles 1 and 2 at each dose level. RESULTS: 18 patients were enrolled in this study with the most frequent tumor types being non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell cancer. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia (n=1 at dose level 2, n=2 at dose level 4). Rash, diarrhea, and fatigue were the most common grade 1-2 toxicities. Pharmacokinetic data indicated no accumulation of gefitinib between cycles 1 and 2 and no clear correlation between gefitinib plasma levels and toxicity. Partial responses were observed in one patient with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and one patient with anaplastic thyroid cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for phase II studies is gefitinib 2,250 mg on days 1 and 2, followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 3.     

A phase I trial of high-dose continuous-infusion hydroxyurea

Hydroxyurea inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, resulting in depletion of intracellular deoxynucleotide pools and inhibition of DNA repair. It has been used in a variety of malignancies and is usually given orally. Deoxynucleotide depletion is directly related to the concentration of and duration of exposure to hydroxyurea; thus, prolonged continuous infusion may result in increased therapeutic efficacy. A total of 30 patients were treated on this trial, designed to determine the maximum tolerated, doses (MTD) of intravenous hydroxyurea given as a 24-or 48-h continuous infusion. The MTD for the 24-h infusion was 13,520 mg/m² following a bolus of 1,690 mg/m², and the mean (±SD) plasma steady-state concentration was 1.93±0.52 mM. For the 48-h infusion, the MTD was 17,576 mg/m² following a bolus of 2,197 mg/m² and the mean steady-state level was 1.43±0.31 mM. The doselimiting toxicity on both schedules was marrow suppression manifesting as, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed decreasing clearance with increasing dose, implying that drug elimination is saturable. Pharmacodynamic analysis showed a slight correlation between steady-state plasma levels and the degree of marrow suppression.This work was supported in part by grants 5T32-CA-09307, P30-A-14236-18, and 5-R01-CA45529 from the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute and by the P.B. Cohen Memorial Fund     

2{alpha} 3{alpha}-Epithio-5{alpha}-androstan-17{beta}-ol in Treatment of Gynecomastia

1. 1. The clinical effect of epitiostanol, a new anti-estrogenagent (2,3-epithio-5a-androstan-17ß-ol) against gynecomastiawas studied in comparison with dromostanolone propionate infifty-four patients ranging from twenty to fifty years in agewithout previous history of hormone therapy and with normalliver function. The experiment was performed for eight weeksby double blind methods in three dosage groups, epithiostanol10 mg, and 20 mg and dromostanolone propionate 50 mg.
2. 2. Epithiostanol20 mg was most effective with regards to effecton mass sizeand tenderness, (effective in 96%, 20/21), followedby 10 mgepitiostanol (effective in 89%, 16/18) and dromostanolonepropionate50 mg (effective in 89%, 16/18) in descending order.No sideeffects were observed in any of the three groups.
3. 3. Basedon the results of the present study, epitiostanol isconcludedto be at least as effective as dromostanolone propionateagainstgynecomastia and to be safe from the viewpoint of sideeffects.A satisfactory therapeutical effect on gynecomastiacan be expectedwith a weekly dosage of 20 mg of epitiostanolfor an administrationperiod of between five to eight weeks.

Present Address: Department of Surgery, Keio University Hospital,Shinanomachi, Shin-juku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.     

The application of high-dose interleukin-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) evokes an immune response, which has occasionally resulted in spontaneous and dramatic remissions [1–3]. In an attempt to reproduce or accentuate this response, various immunotherapeutic strategies have been studied. The most consistent anti-tumor activity has been reported with interferon alfa (IFN-α) and interleukin 2 (IL-2). In recent years, randomized trials have suggested that high-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 is superior in terms of response rate and possibly response quality to regimens that involve either low-dose IL-2 and IFN-α, intermediate- or low-dose IL-2 alone, or low-dose IFN-α alone. As this list of effective therapies for RCC grows, improvements in patient selection will be necessary to ensure that the only therapy capable of producing durable remissions will remain available to the patients who should receive it [4–7].     

The application of high-dose interleukin-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) evokes an immune response, which has occasionally resulted in spontaneous and dramatic remissions [1, 2, 3]. In an attempt to reproduce or accentuate this response, various immunotherapeutic strategies have been studied. The most consistent anti-tumor activity has been reported with interferon alfa (IFN-α) and interleukin 2 (IL-2). In recent years, randomized trials have suggested that high-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 is superior in terms of response rate and possibly response quality to regimens that involve either low-dose IL-2 and IFN-α, intermediate- or low-dose IL-2 alone, or low-dose IFN-α alone. As this list of effective therapies for RCC grows, improvements in patient selection will be necessary to ensure that the only therapy capable of producing durable remissions will remain available to the patients who should receive it [4, 5, 6, 7].     

Expression of NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase and glutathione S-transferases {alpha} and {pi} in human renal cell carcinoma and in kidney cancer-derived cell lines

NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (NQOR) and glutathione S-transferases(GST) are enzymes of interest in cell defence and drug resistance.Relative levels of NQOR mRNA in renal cell carcinomas were 28±24% (n=21) of those in non-neoplastic tissue and theenzyme activity decreased from 41±39 to 18±27mU/mg protein (n=23). In three of the cases, there was no measurableNQOR enzyme activity at all, indicating a polymorphism in thepopulation for this gene. Relative GST-a mRNA levels in thetumours were on average 6±6% (n=22) of the control value,whereas for GST-     

Phase II trial of interferon-beta-serine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Interferon-beta-serine (IFN-beta-ser) is a muteine, recombinant IFN that is tolerated at a dose fivefold to 10-fold higher than IFN-alfa and interacts with the same cell membrane receptor as IFN-alfa. We hypothesized that at high doses IFN-beta-ser might induce a higher response rate than IFN-alfa in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We undertook a phase II trial of IFN-beta-ser in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Patients were treated three times each week by a 2-hour intravenous infusion. Doses were escalated weekly (.25 to 5.5 mg, 1 mg = 180,000,000 U) until the maximum-tolerated treatment dose (MTTD) was determined. The MTTD is defined as one dose level less than that which caused grade 3 toxicity and was subsequently administered three times weekly for at least 4 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were entered, and 25 were assessable for response and toxicity. The performance status was 0-1 in all patients and only one patient received previous chemotherapy. The MTTD dose was 2.5 mg (range, 0.5 to 5.5 mg per treatment), although in 10 patients, doses were later deescalated because of cumulative toxicity. Initial dose-limiting toxicity and cumulative toxicity were fatigue, malaise, and fever in most patients. Hepatic transaminitis, neutropenia, and elevation of serum creatinine were also observed but were not dose-limiting. There was one complete response (CR) and four partial responses (PRs). All responses but one occurred in pulmonary metastases. The median time to response was 26 days (range, 17 to 102 days). These data demonstrate that IFN-beta-ser given in high doses exhibits significant antitumor activity in renal cell carcinoma; however, the objective response rate is 20%. This is no higher than previous IFN studies; therefore, we reject the hypothesis than IFN-beta-ser at high doses may induce a greater response rate than IFN-alfa. However, we did observe more responses than were seen in a similar trial undertaken with lower dose IFN-beta serine in renal cell carcinoma.     

Phase I trial of personalized peptide vaccination for cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the toxicity and immunological responses of personalized peptide vaccination for cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Patients were confirmed to be human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24 or HLA-A2 positive and had histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma. Ten patients were enrolled in the present study. The peptides to be administered were determined based on the presence of peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and peptide-specific IgG in the plasma of cancer patients. Patients received subcutaneous injections of four different peptides (3 mg/peptide) every 2 weeks. Vaccinations were well tolerated without any major adverse events. A minimal increase in peptide-specific interferon-γ production in postvaccination PBMC was observed, regardless of higher levels of cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in prevaccination PBMC. In contrast, an increase in peptide-specific IgG levels of postvaccination (sixth) plasma was observed in the majority of patients. After progression, five patients received interleukin-2 therapy and continuous vaccination, with survival of 31, 25, 23, 17, and 15 months, but interleukin-2 did not impede humoral responses boosted by the vaccination. These results encourage further clinical trials of personalized peptide vaccinations. ( Cancer Sci 2007; 98: 1965–1968)