Non-helmeted motorcyclists: a burden to society? A study using the National Trauma Data Bank

INTRODUCTION: Helmet laws remain controversial. Opponents believe negative findings are a result of biased statistical analyses that fail to account for the impact of alcohol and drugs. In this study, we evaluated the effect that helmet use had upon injury severity, outcome controlling for alcohol or drug use, resource utilization, and financial burden using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). METHODS: Two groups of patients, helmeted and non-helmeted motorcyclists, were identified using the NTDB over an 8-year period. Group differences were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for dichotomous outcomes. To evaluate the effect that alcohol or drug use had on mortality, logistic regression models were created. RESULTS: A total of 9,769 patients were identified by the NTDB of which 6756 (69.2%) were helmeted and 3013 (30.8%) were non-helmeted. Helmet use was associated with lower injury severity, mortality, and resource utilization. Non-helmeted motorcyclists accrued greater hospital charges and were significantly less likely to have health insurance. When controlling for alcohol or drug use, mortality continued to be significantly associated with non-helmet use. CONCLUSION: Non-helmeted motorcyclists have worse outcomes than their helmeted counterparts independent of the use of alcohol or drugs. Furthermore, they monopolize more hospital resources, incur higher hospital charges, and as non-helmeted motorcyclists frequently do not have insurance, reimbursement in this group of patients is poor. Thus, the burden of caring for these patients is transmitted to society as a whole.     

National Practitioner Data Bank: Who can open the vault?

The National Provider Data Bank (NPDB) was created to restrict physicians from practicing “anonymously” across state lines. But a recent Government Accounting Office report stated that the NPDB is flawed because of underreporting, incorrect reporting, and limited access. For example, a private settlement between a physician and patient is not a reportable event because physicians are not defined as “eligible entities” under the law. The author discusses measures for improving the accuracy of Data Bank information and alternatives providing limited public access to physician information. (Aesthetic Surg J 2001;21:277-278.)     

Is emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy futile care for the critically injured patient requiring prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

BACKGROUND: Documented prehospital asystole justifies termination of resuscitation, but recently it has been proposed to extend this policy to patients in the field with pulseless electrical activity. Consequently, we questioned whether resuscitative thoracotomy is warranted in the critically injured patient who fails to respond to prehospital CPR. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective database of all emergency department resuscitative thoracotomies (EDT) performed at our Level I trauma center has been maintained since January 1977. These registry data were augmented by a review of prehospital paramedic records for all survivors of EDT to verify length of CPR. RESULTS: During the 26-year study period, 959 patients underwent EDT. Of the 62 patients who survived to leave the hospital, 26 (42%) required prehospital CPR. The injury mechanism in these 26 patients was stab wounds in 18 (69%), gunshot wounds in 4 (15%), and blunt trauma in 4 (15%). The duration of prehospital CPR ranged from 3 to 15 minutes and in 7 patients CPR exceeded 10 minutes. Five survivors had asystole documented at the time of EDT; four of these patients had good functional outcomes at discharge. Each of these patients had pericardial tamponade from ventricular stab wounds. Patients with blunt trauma had uniformly dismal neurologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: EDT after prehospital CPR can be used to salvage select critically injured patients. Based on these data, we propose that resuscitative thoracotomy is futile care in patients with blunt trauma requiring prehospital CPR longer than 5 minutes, and in patients with penetrating trauma with more than 15 minutes of prehospital CPR. EDT is warranted in those patients with penetrating trauma with less than 15 minutes of prehospital CPR, and should be performed despite documented asystole on arrival if pericardial tamponade is the proximate event.     

Trauma Whipple: Do or Don’t After Severe Pancreaticoduodenal Injuries? An Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB)

Background

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma (PDT) is a rare procedure, reserved for severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries. Using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), our aim was to compare outcomes of PDT patients to similarly injured patients who did not undergo a PDT.

Methods

Patients with pancreatic or duodenal injuries treated with PDT (ICD-9-CM 52.7) were identified in the NTDB 2008–2010 Research Data Sets. We excluded those who underwent delayed PDT (>4 days). The PDT group (n = 39) was compared to patients with severe combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries (grade 4 or 5) who did not undergo PDT (non-PDT group, n = 38). Patients who died in the emergency department or did not undergo a laparotomy were excluded. Our primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and total ventilator days. A multivariate model was used to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality within each group and in the overall cohort.

Results

The non-PDT group had a significantly lower systolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scale values at baseline and more severe duodenal, pancreatic, and liver injuries. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. The Injury Severity Score was the only independent predictor of mortality among PDT patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.24] and in the entire cohort (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.01–1.12). The operative technique did not influence any of the outcomes.

Conclusions

Compared to non-PDT, PDT did not result in improved outcomes despite a lower physiologic burden among PDT patients. More conservative procedures for high-grade injuries of the pancreaticoduodenal complex may be appropriate.     

How much liver resection is too much?

BACKGROUND: Hepatic failure occurring after liver resection carries a poor prognosis and is a complication dreaded by surgeons. Inadequate reserve in the remaining parenchyma leads to a steady decrease in liver function, inability to regenerate, and progression to liver failure. For this reason, many methods to quantify functional hepatic reserve have been developed. METHODS: This article reviews the main methods used in the assessment of hepatic reserve in patients undergoing hepatectomy and their use in operative decision making. RESULTS: A range of methods to categorically quantify the functional reserve of the liver have been developed, ranging from scoring systems (such as the Child-Pugh classification) to tests assessing complex hepatic metabolic pathways to radiological methods to assess functional reserve. However, no one method has or is ever likely to emerge as a single measure with which to dictate safe limits of resectability. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, the role of residual liver function assessment may be of most benefit in the routine stratification of risk, thus enabling both patient consent to be obtained and surgical procedure to be performed, with full information and facts regarding operative risks. However, there is no one single test that remains conclusively superior.     

The Kasai portoenterostomy: when is it too late?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Kasai portoenterostomy is recommended as the primary initial therapy for extrahepatic biliary atresia if the procedure can be performed within 10 to 12 weeks of life. The optimal management for infants with delayed presentation of biliary atresia remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the success rate and outcome for patients who underwent a "late" Kasai portoenterostomy. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients with biliary atresia who underwent a Kasai portoenterostomy at their institution from 1986 to 1999 (n = 31). The authors analyzed success rates compared with age at the time of the Kasai procedure and the association with patient demographics. Surgical success was defined as achievement of a total serum bilirubin < or = 2 mg/dL. Long-term follow-up assessments included the need for liver transplantation and patient survival rate. RESULTS: The demographics of this study cohort showed a predominance of African-Americans, 19 of 31 (61%), and girls, 23 of 31 (74%). Assessment of success compared with subject age at the time of the initial portoenterostomy showed that 52% (13 of 25) had successful Kasai procedure at 0 to 75 days, compared with 83% success rate (5 of 6) at age 76 days or older (P = .359). Liver transplantation was performed in 16 of 31 patients (45%). Overall survival rate for the entire cohort is 23 of 31 (74%), whereas 12 of 31 (39%) are currently alive without a liver transplant. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that there is no contraindication to performing a Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia in children over 75 days of age.     

How little is enough? The evidence for post-vasectomy testing

PURPOSE: Post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is the traditional method of confirming sterility after vasectomy. However, PVSA protocols vary in the end points accepted, and the number and timing of tests. In this systematic review we make evidence based recommendations on the appropriate PVSA protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases (MEDLINE, Current Contents, Cochrane Library and EMBASE) were searched up to and including March 2003. Studies were included if they dealt with post-vasectomy testing and contained data on at least 1 of the time or number of ejaculations to azoospermia, pregnancy, repeat vasectomy and histological analysis of vas specimens. RESULTS: A total of 56 studies were included in the review. Time to achieve azoospermia was variable, although the median incidence of patients with azoospermia was consistently more than 80% after 3 months and after 20 ejaculations. A small percent of patients (14,845 or 1.4%) demonstrated persistent nonmotile sperm, although some of them eventually achieved azoospermia. The reappearance of nonmotile sperm was reported in 7 studies, occurring up to 22 months after vasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supports a PVSA protocol with 1 test showing azoospermia after 3 months and 20 ejaculations. If the sample is positive, periodic testing can continue until azoospermia is achieved. Patients with persistent nonmotile sperm in low numbers could be given cautious assurance of success. No evidence was located to support histological testing of the excised vas deferens.