Bronchial hyperreactivity and spirometric impairment in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic disorders are characterized by a systemic involvement of the immune response. There is a clear link between allergic rhinitis and asthma. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) may be present in rhinitics. Smaller airways may also be impaired in mild asthma. This study aimed at evaluating a group of subjects suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis alone to investigate the presence of BHR and spirometric impairment. METHODS: One hundred rhinitics sensitized only to perennial allergens were evaluated. Spirometry and methacholine bronchial challenge were performed. RESULTS: Five rhinitics showed reduced values of forced expiratory volume/1 s (FEV(1)) without symptoms of asthma. Forty-eight rhinitics had reduced forced expiratory flow at 25 and 75% of pulmonary volume (FEF(25-75)) values. Seventy-two patients showed a positive methacholine challenge. In this group, reduced values of FVC (p < 0.05), FEV(1) (p < 0.05), and FEF(25-75) (p < 0.01) were demonstrated in comparison with BHR-negative rhinitics. There was a relationship between the degree of BHR and FEV(1) values (p < 0.05) and FEF(25-75) values (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study evidences that an impairment of spirometric parameters may be observed in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis alone. A high percentage of these patients have BHR. Thus, new management strategies should be employed in rhinitics.     

Allergic rhinitis with or without concomitant asthma: difference in perception of dyspnoea and levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide

BACKGROUND/AIM: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a risk factor for developing clinical asthma. Moreover, AR is often associated with bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether patients with AR and asthma differed from AR with or without BHR in degree of perception of dyspnoea and airway inflammation, measured as fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (NO). MATERIALS: Twenty-nine patients with seasonal AR (timothy) were investigated with metacholine challenge test. Fourteen healthy non-reactive subjects served as controls. METHODS: (1) Metacholine challenge test, cut-off value forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) PD20 2,000 microg. Slope value for metacholine was calculated as %fall in FEV(1)/mol metacholine. Dyspnoea during challenge was measured with a 10-graded modified Borg score. (2) Measurement of fractional-exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) at flow rate 50 mL/s. RESULTS: Eighteen patients reported AR only, without asthma symptoms, and 12 (67%) were BHR. Eleven subjects had both rhinitis and asthma symptoms. Patients with rhinitis and asthma reported significantly more dyspnoea per percent fall in FEV(1) compared with those with rhinitis and BHR. Moreover, those with rhinitis and asthma had significantly higher NO values compared with those with rhinitis and BHR. CONCLUSION: The difference between rhinitis patients with or without asthma symptoms seems to be mainly a question of perception of dyspnoea. However, FENO measurement indicates that dyspnoea may also be associated with increased inflammatory activity in the peripheral airways.     

Effect of cetirizine on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma

Although H1 antihistamine compounds (H1) are highly effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR), their role in the treatment of asthma is still controversial. Because a strong association between AR and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) has been reported, this study was designed to assess the effect of a new H1 anti histamine, cetirizine (C), on nonspecific BHR in patients with AR. Twelve patients were included in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. All patients had positive skin tests for common allergens and showed BHR to inhaled methacholine after specific nasal allergenic challenge. After a washout period of 1 week to ensure the stability of the BHR, the patients received, by crossover randomization, C 10 mg daily or placebo (P) for 2 weeks. After each treatment period, BHR and nasal blocking index (NBI) were measured 1 and 6 h after nasal challenge. Bronchial responsiveness was expressed as methacholine PD20, the provocation dose of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1. Measurements were then performed after 2 weeks of C and after 2 weeks of P. Baseline values of PD20 (median) measured before challenge showed no difference after cetirizine or after placebo (1.36 mg). Results 1 h after allergen did not show significant differences between C (methacholine PD20=0.522 mg) and placebo (methacholine PD20=0.455 mg). By contrast, 6 h after challenge, methacholine PD20 was 0.918 mg for C and 0.483 mg for P (P=0.042). Similarly, NBI showed no change between C and P 1 h after challenge, whereas the difference was significant 6 h after challenge (P=0.011 ). These data demonstrate a protective nasal effect of C against BHR measured 6 h after nasal allergen challenge in patients with AR. They suggest that C may be useful in patients with asthma associated with AR.     

Relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: The nasal and bronchial mucosa present similarities and most patients with asthma also have rhinitis, suggesting the concept of 'one airway one disease'. Although many studies may suggest the relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, few studies have been published which address this question directly. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the relationship between nonspecific nasal and bronchial responsiveness exists in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma. METHODS: Fifty-one perennial allergic rhinitic patients with the definitive or suspected asthma underwent methacholine bronchial provocation tests and nasal histamine challenge tests. A slope of the absolute changes in nasal symptoms score/log concentrations of histamine was calculated by linear regression analysis. A ratio of the final absolute change in nasal symptoms score to the sum of all the doses of histamine given to the subject was also calculated. The degree of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was categorized as positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) if PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in 20% fall in FEV(1)) was <4 mg/ml, borderline BHR if PC(20) was >or=4 but 16 mg/ml. Another index of bronchial responsiveness (BRindex) was calculated as the log [(% decline in FEV(1)/log final methacholine concentration as mg/dl) + 10]. RESULTS: The geometric means of the slope (4.47 vs. 2.95, p < 0.05) and the ratio (1.68 vs. 0.54, p < 0.01) were higher in patients with positive BHR (n = 23) than in patients with negative BHR (n = 19), respectively. The geometric means of the slope (3.50) and the ratio (1.13) in patients with borderline BHR (n = 9) were between the two groups, respectively. In all patients, the log-slope (r = 0.48, p < 0.001) and the log-ratio (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) were correlated well with the BRindex, respectively. Even in allergic rhinitic patients with definitive asthma, the log-slope was correlated with the BRindex (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) or log-PC(20) (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nonspecific nasal responsiveness may be related to the nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, which may support the viewpoint that allergic rhinitis and asthma represent a continuum of inflammation involving one common airway.     

Association between body mass index and allergy in teenage girls in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of atopy and asthma is affected by age, sex and lifestyle factors. Obesity was reported to be a risk factor for asthmatic symptoms in children and adults. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between body mass index (BMI) and the prevalence of atopy, rhinitis, wheezing and bronchial responsiveness in adolescents. METHODS: BMI (kg/m2), skin-prick test, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine, and self-reported rhinitis and airway symptoms were assessed in a cross-sectional survey in 1459 eighth-grade students (age 13.2 to 15.5, mean 13.6 years) of seven junior high schools in northern Taiwan. RESULTS: The prevalence of atopy was 42% in boys and 27% in girls. The study population was grouped into quintiles of BMI by sex. Girls in the highest BMI quintile had higher prevalence of atopy and rhinitis symptoms. Compared with the middle three quintiles, they had increased risk of atopy in multivariate analyses adjusted for area of living, sibling number, parent education level and family history of asthma (odds ratio = 1.77, 95% confidence interval = 1.15-2.73). Girls with the lowest BMI quintile had lower prevalence of BHR and wheezing. Compared with the middle three quintiles, they had reduced risk of BHR in multivariate analyses adjusted for area of living, atopy, family history of asthma, and baseline pulmonary function (odds ratio = 0.40, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-0.81). No association between BMI and atopy or BHR was seen in boys. CONCLUSION: BMI was a significant predictor of atopy, allergic symptoms and BHR in teenage girls.     

Relationship of skin-prick reactivity to aeroallergens and hyperresponsiveness to challenges with methacholine and adenosine monophosphate

BACKGROUND: Clarification of the relationship between atopy and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), both key features of asthma, is critical to our understanding of the disease. We therefore investigated the putative relationship between skin-prick reactivity to aeroallergens and BHR to direct and indirect stimuli. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 332 patients presenting with a diagnosis of asthma. Patients were characterized by skin prick tests (SPT), spirometry and bronchial challenge with methacholine and adenosine monophosphate (AMP). RESULTS: For patients who had BHR to methacholine but not AMP, the presence of atopy was associated with a lower PD20 (the provocative dose of methacholine producing a fall in FEV1 of 20%), amounting to a geometric mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) of 2.3-fold (1.4-4.0) difference. Furthermore, the number of skin-prick positive (SPP) responses was related to methacholine reactivity: 0-1 SPP, PD20 = 69.9 micro g; 2-4 SPP, PD20 = 47.8 micro g; 5-8 SPP, PD20 = 35.6 micro g. There was a 2.0- fold (1.1-3.6) difference between the groups with a low (0-1 SPP) and high (5-8 SPP) degree of skin-prick reactivity. A similar pattern was seen when data were analyzed including only perennial allergens. Spirometry was unrelated to the degree of skin-prick reactivity. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that skin-prick reactivity to aeroallergens is associated with BHR to methacholine.     

Nasal eosinophilic inflammation contributes to bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis

There are increasing evidences that allergic rhinitis (AR) may influence the clinical course of asthma. We conducted methacholine challenge test and nasal eosinophils on nasal smear to patients with allergic rhinitis in order to investigate the mechanism of connecting upper and lower airway inflammation in 35 patients with AR during exacerbation. The methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was used as thresholds of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Thresholds of 25 mg/dL or less were assumed to indicate BHR. All patients had normal pulmonary function. Significant differences in BHR were detected in the comparison of patients with cough or postnasal drip and without cough or postnasal drip. There were significant differences of PC20 between patients with cough or postnasal drip and those without cough or postnasal drip (3.41+/-3.59 mg/mL vs 10.2+/-1.2 mg/mL, p=0.001). The levels of total IgE were higher in patients with seasonal AR than in patients with perennial AR with exacerbation (472.5+/-132.5 IU/L vs. 389.0+/-70.9 IU/L, p<0.05). Nasal eosinophils were closely related to log PC20 (r=-0.65, p<0.01). These findings demonstrated that nasal eosinophilic inflammation might contribute to BHR in patients with AR.     

Dissimilarity between seasonal changes in airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate and methacholine in patients with grass pollen allergic rhinitis: relation to induced sputum

BACKGROUND: In patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation may increase during pollen exposure. BHR can be assessed by adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) or methacholine challenge. It has been suggested that BHR to AMP is more closely related to airway inflammation than BHR to methacholine. Seasonal allergic rhinitis offers a dynamic model to study changes in BHR and airway inflammation during natural allergen exposure. METHODS: We measured BHR [provocative concentration causing a 20% fall (PC(20)) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))] to AMP and methacholine, and induced sputum cells in 16 rhinitis patients before and during the 2001 grass pollen season. RESULTS: There was a decrease in PC(20) methacholine during pollen exposure (geometric mean PC(20) from 3.22 to 1.73 mg/ml, p = 0.0023), whereas no reduction was observed for PC(20) AMP (p = 0.11). There was no increase in sputum eosinophils [pre: 0.69% (95% confidence interval 0.22-2.07); during: 1.85 (0.55- 5.6), p = 0.31]. Although the correlation of log PC(20) methacholine and log PC(20) AMP at baseline was good (r = 0.76, p = 0.001), individual seasonal changes (doubling concentrations) in PC(20) methacholine were not correlated with changes in PC(20) AMP (rho = 0.21, p = 0.44). There was no correlation between baseline log PC(20) methacholine or seasonal changes in PC(20) methacholine and sputum eosinophils (p > 0.12, all correlations). In contrast, there was a significant correlation between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and changes in sputum eosinophils (rho = -0.59, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: These data show dissimilarity between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and methacholine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Moreover, PC(20) AMP seems to be more closely related to sputum eosinophils than PC(20) methacholine. The clinical significance of this discrepancy is unclear.     

Comparison of bronchial responsiveness to histamine in asthma, allergic rhinitis and allergic sensitization at the age of 7 years

BACKGROUND: Bronchial responsiveness (BR) to histamine or methacholin is a common finding in adult non-asthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We tested whether BR is also present in children with a comparatively short history of allergic rhinitis in a paediatric cohort. METHODS: We performed pulmonary function tests and histamine challenges in a total of 654 children (age 7 years, participants of the German Multicenter Allergy Study) and compared PC20 FEV1 values in children with asthma, allergic rhinitis, asymptomatic allergic sensitization and non-atopic controls. RESULTS: Most pronounced BR to histamine was observed in allergic asthmatics (n = 28), irrespective of the presence or absence of allergic rhinitis. Furthermore, PC(20)FEV(1) values in non-asthmatic children with allergic rhinitis (n = 24) were not significantly different from those seen in asymptomatic atopic (n = 54) or non-atopic controls (n = 92). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to adult study populations, 7-year-old non-asthmatic children with allergic rhinitis do not show a higher degree of BR than asymptomatic atopic or non-atopic controls. Therefore, secondary preventive measures in non-asthmatic children with allergic rhinitis (such as regular local anti-inflammatory therapy or specific immunotherapy) should be studied and applied more intensely to prevent bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and asthma in this high-risk group.     

Mucosal symptoms elicited by fragrance products in a population-based sample in relation to atopy and bronchial hyper-reactivity

BACKGROUND: Exposure to perfume and fragrance products may, in some individuals, cause symptoms from the eyes and airways. The localization, character and risk factors of such symptoms in the general population are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate both the localization and character of symptoms from the eyes and airways elicited by fragrance products, and the associations between such symptoms and skin prick test reactivity (atopy), methacholine bronchial hyper-reactivity (BHR), allergic rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: A questionnaire on mucosal symptoms elicited by fragrance products was posted to 1189 persons who had participated in a Danish population-based study of allergic diseases in 1997/1998. The study included measurement of BHR, atopy, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (serum ECP). RESULTS: The response rate was 79.6%. Symptoms from the eyes or airways elicited by fragrance products were reported by 42%. BHR (adjusted odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.5) was independently associated with symptoms from the eyes and airways elicited by fragrance products. There were no significant associations between these symptoms and atopy, FEV1 or serum ECP. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal symptoms from the eyes and airways were common in this population. BHR was a significant and independent predictor of these symptoms. The lack of association with atopy suggested that IgE-mediated allergic mechanisms do not play a major role in the development of these symptoms.     

Role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: The small airways may play an important role in the clinical manifestations of asthma. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (FEF25%-75%) has been proposed as an approximate measure of the caliber of distal airways. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a feature of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of BHR in allergic patients with asthma and rhinitis. METHODS: A total of 726 patients (mean +/- SD age, 24.7 +/- 6.3 years) were evaluated. Spirometry and methacholine bronchial challenge were evaluated in all the participants. RESULTS: A difference between forced expiratory volume in 1 second and FEF25%-75% greater than 20 or a ratio between these variables greater than 1.24 discriminates between patients with no response to a mild response to methacholine vs patients with a moderate-to-severe response with high sensitivity (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the possible role of FEF25%-75% in predicting BHR in allergic individuals with airway disorders.     

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in young children with allergic rhinitis and its risk factors

BACKGROUND: Subjects with allergic rhinitis but no clinical evidence of asthma have greater bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and several factors have been implicated as its determinants. However, studies in young children are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of BHR in young children with allergic rhinitis and to investigate its risk factors. METHODS: Methacholine bronchial challenges were performed in 4- to 6-year-old nonasthmatic children with allergic rhinitis (n = 83) and in healthy nonatopic controls (n = 32), using a modified auscultation method. The end-point was defined as the appearance of wheezing and/or oxygen desaturation. Subjects were considered to have BHR when they had end-point concentrations of methacholine 相似文献   

The importance of maximal airway response to methacholine in the prediction of asthma development in patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a known predictor and correlate of asthma incidence. However, it is not clear which patients with allergic rhinitis are at greater risk of the development of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether airway hypersensitivity and/or increased maximal response on the dose-response curve to methacholine would predict the development of asthma in subjects with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one children with allergic rhinitis were prospectively studied for 7 years. At the initiation of the study, bronchial provocation test with methacholine using a stepwise increasing concentration technique was performed to measure PC(20) (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) and maximal response. Each subject was evaluated at least every 6 months and details of asthmatic symptoms or signs experienced during the intervening period were taken. RESULTS: Twenty of 122 subjects available for the follow-up developed asthma. Nine (19.6%) of 46 hypersensitive (PC(20) < 18 mg/mL) subjects developed asthma, compared with 11 (14.5%) of 76 normosensitive subjects (P = 0.462). Eight (32%) of 25 subjects without maximal response plateau developed asthma, compared with 12 (12.4%) of 97 subjects with maximal response plateau (P = 0.018). Score test for trend revealed a significant association between the level of maximal response (P = 0.007), but not the degree of methacholine PC(20) (P = 0.123), and the future development of asthma. CONCLUSION: An increased maximal airway response to methacholine is shown to be a better predictor for the future development of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis, than airway hypersensitivity to methacholine.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

The determinants of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with allergic rhinitis and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) may be at higher risk of developing asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether reactivity to aeroallergens in skin prick testing (SPT) and serum eosinophil cationic protein levels can be used to predict BHR in allergic rhinitis patients. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with allergic rhinitis underwent SPTs using grass, tree, weed, parietaria, Alternaria, Aspergillus, mites, and cat and dog dander extracts. Methacholine challenge tests were performed using spirometry. RESULTS: Methacholine-induced BHR was detected in 23 patients (39%). Of 59 patients, 14 had 1 positive SPT response, 35 had 2 to 4 positive responses, and 10 had more than 4 positive responses. There was a significant inverse correlation between methacholine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20) and the number of positive SPT responses (r = -0.28; P = .03). The BHR-positive patients had a mean of 4 positive SPT responses, whereas BHR-negative patients had a mean of 2.6 (P = .04). Nine BHR-positive patients (39%) and only 1 BHR-negative patient (3%) had more than 4 positive SPT responses (P < .001). There was no correlation between serum eosinophil cationic protein levels and methacholine PC20 doses. There was a strong association between hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and both cat and dog dander sensitivity (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic rhinitis patients with SPT responses to a higher number of allergens are more likely to have BHR. Whether the number of positive SPT responses correlates with the risk of developing asthma in allergic rhinitis patients remains to be determined.     

A familial predisposition in bronchial hyperresponsiveness among patients with allergic rhinitis

Background: Nonasthmatic subjects with allergic rhinitis often have bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). The mechanisms responsible for BHR in asthma include genetic predisposition and airway inflammation, but the causes of BHR in allergic rhinitis are poorly understood. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a familial predisposition in allergic rhinitis–associated BHR. Methods: One hundred fifteen children with allergic rhinitis (probands) and their family members underwent methacholine bronchial challenge and skin prick tests with airborne allergens. The probands were divided into 2 groups: BHR(+) (methacholine PC₂₀ <18 mg/mL determined by the dosimeter method; n = 42) and BHR(–) (n = 73). Results: The overall prevalence of BHR was higher in family members of BHR(+) probands than in those of BHR(–) probands (23.3% [27 of 116] vs 10.5% [21 of 200], P < .01). In mothers, this difference was marked (21.4% vs 8.2%, P < .05); a similar trend was observed in fathers (16.7% vs 6.8%) and siblings (34.4% vs 18.5%), although the differences did not reach significance (.05 < P < .1). The bronchial responsiveness index (BR index), a continuous variable derived from the results of methacholine challenge, was significantly higher among family members of the BHR(+) group than those of the BHR(–) group. Furthermore, even when only family members without BHR were considered, the BR index was significantly higher among those (n = 89) of the BHR(+) group than those (n = 179) of the BHR(–) group. There was no difference in atopic status as assessed by the prevalence of atopy (or atopy index) between family members of the BHR(+) group and the BHR(–) group. Conclusion: Our results indicated that there is a significant familial predisposition for BHR among patients with allergic rhinitis. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether genetic factors play a role in allergic rhinitis–associated BHR. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;102:921-6.)     

Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?

BACKGROUND: Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agreement between histamine challenge testing and PEF variability, and the consequences for diagnosing asthma. AIM: To investigate the possibility of assessing BHR by PEF variability, using a histamine provocation test as a reference. METHOD: Subjects with signs of symptoms indicating asthma (persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms or signs of reversible bronchial obstruction) (n = 323) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening for asthma. A histamine provocation test and PEF variability were assessed over a three-week period. Asthma was defined as signs or symptoms together with a reversible airflow obstruction or BHR to the histamine challenge test. BHR was defined as a PC20 histamine of < or = 8 mg/ml or a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation between PC20 and PEF variability was calculated using Spearman's rho. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to clarify the role of BHR in diagnosing asthma. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients had a reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of > or = 9% predicted, 131 patients showed a PC20 of < or = 8 and 11 patients had a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation was poor at only -0.27 (P < 0.0001). One hundred and fourteen of the 131 patients diagnosed as having asthma when the histamine challenge test was used were not diagnosed by PEF variability. CONCLUSION: PEF variability cannot replace bronchial provocation testing in assessing BHR. This indicates that PEF variability and bronchial provocation do not measure the same aspects of BHR. If BHR testing is required in diagnosing asthma, a bronchial provocation test has to be used in general practice as well.     

Factors influencing symptom expression in children with bronchial hyperresponsiveness at 10 years of age

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify factors associated with wheezing symptoms in children found to have bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) at 10 years of age. METHODS: Children were seen at birth, 1, 2, 4 and 10 years of age in an entire population birth cohort study (n = 1456). At each stage information was collected prospectively on genetic and environmental risk factors for BHR. Skin prick testing was performed at 4 and 10 years of age. Spirometry and methacholine bronchial challenge were conducted at 10 years of age when BHR was considered present if PC(20) FEV(1) was < 4.0 mg/mL. In children with BHR at 10 years of age, factors independently associated with current wheezing were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: BHR was identified in 169 10-year-olds at bronchial challenge, 55.6% of whom manifested current wheeze. In children with BHR, current wheezers had higher Log(10) total IgE and greater BHR than those who had never wheezed. Symptomatic BHR was independently associated with atopic sensitization (P <.001) and maternal asthma (P =.011) at 10 years of age. If only factors present in the first 4 years of life were considered, parental smoking at 4 years of age (P =.021), maternal asthma (P =.017), and atopic sensitization at 4 years of age (P =.004) were independently associated with symptomatic BHR at 10 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic BHR is associated with greater degrees of BHR and higher total IgE. Heredity, atopy, and environmental exposure might influence symptom expression in children with BHR.     

Relationship Between Atopy and Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness

Both atopy and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) are characteristic features of asthma. They are also found among non-asthmatic subjects, including allergic rhinitis patients and the general population. Atopy and BHR in asthma are closely related. Atopy induces airway inflammation as an IgE response to a specific allergen, which causes or amplifies BHR. Moreover, significant evidence of the close relationship between atopy and BHR has been found in non-asthmatic subjects. In this article, we discuss the relationship between atopy and BHR in the general population, asthmatic subjects, and those with allergic rhinitis. This should widen our understanding of the pathophysiology of atopy and BHR.     

Relationships of methacholine and AMP responsiveness with peak expiratory flow variability in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: Both bronchial responsiveness (BR) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability are increased in asthma. PEF variability is presumed to reflect the degree of BR in asthma. BR is commonly assessed by bronchial challenges using direct or indirect stimuli. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) responsiveness with regard to their relationships with PEF variability in children with asthma. METHODS: Methacholine and AMP challenge tests were performed in 79 children with mild to moderate asthma, and a provocative concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC(20)) was calculated for each challenge. Subjects recorded PEF each morning and each evening for 14 consecutive days. PEF variability was expressed as amplitude percentage mean (amp%mean; high PEF minus low PEF on each day, expressed as a percentage of their mean, averaged over 14 days), and as the lowest percentage highest (low%high; the lowest PEF expressed as a percentage of the highest PEF recorded over the period). RESULTS: Methacholine PC(20) correlated significantly but weakly with both indices of PEF variability (amp%mean: r=-0.285, P=0.011; low%high: r=0.238, P=0.034). However, there was a significant and strong correlation between AMP PC(20) and both amp%mean (r=-0.583, P=0.000) and low%high (r=0.496, P=0.000). For AMP PC(20), the correlations were stronger than for methacholine PC(20) (comparison of correlation coefficients with amp%mean: P=0.021; with low%high: P=0.063). CONCLUSION: Both methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) correlated significantly with PEF variability. However, the stronger correlations for AMP PC(20) than for methacholine PC(20) suggest that PEF variability may be better reflected by BR assessed by AMP than by methacholine.