Impact of Toxicity on Survival for Older Adult Patients after CD34+ Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Ex vivo CD34⁺ selection before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) reduces graft-versus-host disease without increasing relapse but usually requires myeloablative conditioning. We aimed to identify toxicity patterns in older patients and the association with overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 patients who underwent CD34⁺ selection allo-HCT using the ClinicMACS® system between 2006 and 2012. All grade 3 to 5 toxicities by CTCAE v4.0 were collected. Eighty patients aged ≥ 60 years with a median age of 64 (range, 60 to 73) were compared with 120 patients aged < 60 years. Median follow-up in survivors was 48.2 months. OS and NRM were similar between ages ≥ 60 and <60, with 1-year OS 70% versus 78% (P?=?.07) and 1-year NRM 23% versus 13% (P?=?.38), respectively. In patients aged ≥ 60 the most common toxicities by day 100 were metabolic, with a cumulative incidence of 88% (95% CI, 78% to 93%), infectious 84% (95% CI, 73% to 90%), hematologic 80% (95% CI, 69% to 87%), oral/gastrointestinal (GI) 48% (95% CI, 36% to 58%), cardiovascular (CV) 35% (95% CI, 25% to 46%), and hepatic 25% (95% CI, 16% to 35%). Patients aged ≥ 60 had a higher risk of neurologic (HR, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.45 to 4.78]; P?=?.001) and CV (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.04 to 2.63]; P?=?.03) toxicities but a lower risk of oral/GI (HR, .58 [95% CI, .41 to .83]; P?=?.003) compared with those aged < 60. CV, hepatic, neurologic, pulmonary, and renal toxicities remained independent risk factors for the risk of death and NRM in separate multivariate models adjusting for age and hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index. Overall, the toxicity of a more intense regimen is potentially balanced by the absence of toxicity related to methotrexate and calcineurin inhibitors in older patients. Prospective study of toxicities after allo-HCT in older patients is essential.     

Impact of a Low CD34+ Cell Dose on Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Although the CD34⁺ cell dose in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is considered to be associated with transplantation outcomes, a lower acceptable threshold has not been defined. We retrospectively analyzed 2919 adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent related PBSCT in Japan between 2001 and 2014. According to the number of CD34⁺ cells in the graft, we categorized 2494 patients in the standard group (2 to 5 × 10⁶ cells/kg), 377 patient in the low group (1 to 2?×?10⁶ cells/kg), and 48 patients in the very low group (<1?×?10⁶ cells/kg). Compared with the standard group, the low and very low groups showed delayed neutrophil recovery (93.8%, 89.5%, and 78.3%, respectively at day +28; P?<?.001) and platelet recovery (69.3%, 53.0%, and 45.5%, respectively at day +28; P?<?.001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) in the 3 groups was 45.5%, 45.3%, and 29.8%, respectively, with inferior survival in the very low group. However, a higher percentage of high-risk patients may account for the inferior survival in the very low group, and no significant difference in OS was found in a multivariate analysis. There were no differences in relapse, nonrelapse mortality, or the development of graft-versus-host disease among the 3 groups. In conclusion, allogeneic PBSCT with low CD34⁺ cell doses of 1 to 2?×?10⁶ cells/kg gives acceptable results, whereas further investigations are needed to evaluate the effects of lower doses of <1?×?10⁶ cells/kg owing to the smaller number and the higher percentage of patients with adverse prognostic factors in this cohort.     

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Comparison of Outcomes between CD34+ Selected and Unmodified Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

In this study, we compared transplantation outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received a CD34⁺ cell-selected and those who received an unmodified allograft. This analysis initially included 181 patients, 60 who received a CD34⁺ cell-selected transplant and 121 who received an unmodified transplant. Owing to significant differences in disease characteristics, the analysis was limited to patients with <10% blasts before HSCT (n?=?145). Two groups were defined: low risk, with low- and intermediate-risk cytogenetics (CD34⁺, n?=?39; unmodified, n?=?46), and high risk: poor and very poor risk cytogenetics (CD34⁺, n?=?19; unmodified, n?=?41). In the low-risk group, the incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at 1 year post-transplantation was 18% in the CD34⁺ subgroup versus 41.3% in the unmodified subgroup (P?=?.015). There were no differences between the subgroups in the incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD. The incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) at 3 years in the 2 subgroups was 5.3% and 56%, respectively (P?<?.001). At 3 years post-transplantation, relapse, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were similar in the CD34⁺ and unmodified subgroups: 8.1% versus 19.4% (P?=?.187), 58.5% versus 53.7% (P?=?.51), and 59.5% versus 52.4% (P?=?.448). However, the composite outcome combining extensive cGVHD-free status and relapse-free status (CRFS) at 3 years was 59.5% in the CD34⁺ group versus 19.2% in the unmodified group (P?<?.001). In the high-risk group, grade II-IV aGVHD at 1 year was 31.6% in the CD34⁺ subgroup versus 24.4% in the unmodified subgroup (P?=?.752). There were no differences between the subgroups in the incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD. The incidence of cGVHD at 3 years in the 2 subgroups was 0% versus 27.6% (P?=?.013). At 3 years post-transplantation, relapse, OS, RFS, and CRFS in the 2 subgroups were 31.6% versus 69.3% (P?=?.007), 35.5% versus 14.5% (P?=?.068), 31.6% versus 10.7% (P?=?.045), and 31.6% versus 6.1% (P?=?.001), respectively. Cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and transplant type had significant univariate associations with RFS in the high-risk cohort. Only cytogenetics (P?=?.03) remained associated with this outcome in a multivariate model. OS was similar in the 2 transplant groups; however, CRFS was superior in the CD34⁺ cell-selected transplant group.     

Early Fluid Overload Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Nonrelapse Mortality after Ex Vivo CD34-Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

In a recently published and validated definition of fluid overload (FO), grade ≥ 2 FO was significantly associated with an increased risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after unmodified and haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) using calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We evaluated the effect of FO on outcomes in 169 patients undergoing myeloablative-conditioned ex vivo CD34⁺ selected allo-HCT using the same grading scale. Thirty patients (17.8%) had grade ≥ 2 FO within the 30 days after ex vivo CD34⁺ selected allo-HCT with a median onset at day 11 (range, -8 to 28). Age ≥ 55 years (odds ratio, 3.43; P = .005) and chemotherapy-based conditioning (odds ratio, 3.89; P = .007) were associated with an increased risk of grade ≥ 2 FO. Patients with early grade ≥ 2 FO had a significantly higher NRM when compared with patients with grade < 2 FO (24.1% versus 3.6% at day 100, P?=?.01). The HCT-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3, FEV₁ < 80, adjusted DL_co < 80, and HLA mismatch were associated with an increased risk of NRM, whereas total body irradiation–based conditioning was associated with a reduced risk of NRM. In a multivariate analysis grade ≥ 2 FO was associated with increased NRM after adjusting for HCT-CI and HLA match (hazard ratio, 2.3; P?=?.014). There was a trend toward inferior relapse-free survival in patients with grade ≥ 2 FO compared with patients with grade < 2 FO, 62% versus 72% at 1 year (P?=?.07), and a trend toward inferior overall survival, 69% versus 79% at 1 year (P?=?0.06), respectively. Our findings show that FO should be routinely assessed to identify patients at risk for NRM. Despite a CNI-free allo-HCT platform, regimen-related tissue and endothelial injury leads to FO in susceptible patients. FO is a highly relevant post-HCT toxicity that requires further inquiry.     

CD34+ Cell Selection versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning and Unmodified Grafts for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients Age >50 Years with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and T cell depletion (TCD) through CD34⁺ cell selection without the use of post-transplantation immunosuppression are 2 strategies used to reduce nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in older patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). To compare the efficacy of the RIC and TCD approaches, we evaluated the outcomes of patients age >50 years with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who underwent allo-HCT from an HLA-matched donor with one of these strategies. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the patients receiving TCD (n?=?204) and those receiving RIC (n?=?151), except for a higher proportion of unrelated donors (68% versus 40%; P?<?.001) and a higher comorbidity burden (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index [HCT-CI] ≥3: 51% versus 38%; P?<?.001) in the TCD cohort. Analysis of outcomes at 3 years showed a higher chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)/relapse-free survival (CRFS) (51% versus 7%; P?<?.001), lower incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD (18% versus 46% at day +180) and chronic GVHD (6% versus 55% at 3 years; P?<?.001), and a lower incidence of relapse (19% versus 33% at 3 years; P?=?.001) in the TCD group compared with the RIC group. Relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and NRM were similar in the 2 groups. Combining transplantation approach (RIC versus TCD) and comorbidity burden (HCT-CI 0-2 versus ≥3), patients with an HCT-CI score of 0-2 seemed to benefit from the TCD approach. In conclusion, in this retrospective study, the use of a CD34⁺ cell-selected graft and a myeloablative conditioning regimen was associated with higher CRFS and similar RFS and OS compared with unmodified allo-RIC in patients age >50 years with AML and MDS.     

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index Predicts Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes Receiving CD34+ Selected Grafts for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

To evaluate the association between the hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and the recently developed age-adjusted HCT-CI (HCT-CI/age) and transplant outcomes in the setting of CD34-selected allogeneic HCT, we analyzed a homogeneous population of patients undergoing allogeneic HCT with CD34-selected grafts for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (n?=?346). Median HCT-CI and HCT-CI/age scores were 2 (percentile 25 to 75, 1 to 4) and 3 (percentile 25 to 75, 1 to 5), respectively. Higher HCT-CI and HCT-CI/age scores were associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and lower overall survival (OS). The HCT-CI distinguished 2 risk groups (0 to 2 versus ≥3), whereas, with the HCT-CI/age, there was a progressive increase in NRM and decrease in OS with increasing scores in all 4 groups (0 versus 1 to 2 versus 3 to 4 versus ≥5). Higher scores in both models were associated with lower chronic graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival but not with higher relapse. Both models showed a promising predictive accuracy for NRM (c??= .616 for HCT-CI and c??=?.647 for HCT-CI/age). In conclusion, the HCT-CI and HCT-CI/age predict transplant outcomes in CD34-selected allo-HCT, including NRM, OS, and chronic graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival and may be used to select appropriate patients for this approach.     

CD34+-Selected Stem Cell Boost without Further Conditioning for Poor Graft Function after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of a CD34⁺-selected stem cell boost (SCB) without prior conditioning in 32 patients (male/22; median age of 54 years; range, 20 to 69) with poor graft function, defined as neutrophils ≤1.5 x 10⁹/L, and/or platelets ≤30 x 10⁹/L, and/or hemoglobin ≤8.5 g/dL). The median interval between stem cell transplantation and SCB was 5 months (range, 2 to 228). The median number of CD34⁺ and CD3⁺ cells were 3.4 x 10⁶/kg (.96 to 8.30) and 9 x 10³/kg body weight (range, 2 to 70), respectively. Hematological improvement was observed in 81% of patients and noted after a median of 30 days (range, 14 to 120) after SCB. The recipients of related grafts responded faster than recipients of unrelated grafts (20 versus 30 days, P = .04). The cumulative incidence of acute (grade II to IV) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after SCB was 17% and 26%, respectively. Patients with acute GVHD received a higher median CD3⁺ cell dose. The 2-year probability of overall survival was 45%. We suggest that SCB represents an effective approach to improve poor graft function post transplantation, but optimal timing of SCB administration, anti-infective, and GVHD prophylaxis needs further evaluation.     

Impact of T Cell Dose on Outcome of T Cell-Replete HLA-Matched Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Data on whether the T cell dose of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products influences transplantation outcomes are conflicting. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified 2736 adult patients who underwent first allogeneic PBSC transplantation for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome between 2008 and 2014 using an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) or an 8/8-matched unrelated donor (MUD). We excluded ex vivo and in vivo T cell-depleted transplantations. Correlative analysis was performed between CD3⁺ T cell dose and the risk of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Using maximum likelihood estimation, we identified CD3⁺ T cell dose cutoff that separated the risk of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV in both the MSD and MUD groups. A CD3⁺ T cell dose cutoff of 14 × 10⁷ cells/kg identified MSD/low CD3⁺ (n = 223) and MSD/high CD3⁺ (n = 1214), and a dose of 15 × 10⁷ cells/kg identified MUD/low CD3⁺ (n = 197) and MUD/high CD3⁺ (n = 1102). On univariate analysis, the MSD/high CD3⁺ group had a higher cumulative incidence of day +100 aGVHD grade II-IV compared with the MSD/low CD3⁺ group (33% versus 25%; P = .009). There were no differences between the 2 groups in engraftment rate, risk of aGVHD grade III-IV or chronic GVHD (cGVHD), NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. The MUD/high CD3⁺ group had a higher cumulative incidence of day +100 aGVHD grade II-IV compared with the MUD/low CD3⁺ group (49% versus 41%; P = .04). There were no differences between the 2 groups in engraftment rate, risk of severe aGVHD or cGVHD, NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. Multivariate analysis of the MSD and MUD groups failed to show an association between CD3⁺ T cell dose and the risk of either aGVHD grade II-IV (P = .10 and .07, respectively) or cGVHD (P = .80 and .30, respectively). Subanalysis of CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio failed to identify cutoff values predictive of transplantation outcomes; however, using the log-rank test, the sample size was suboptimal for identifying a difference at this cutoff cell dose. In this registry study, the CD3⁺ T cell dose of PBSC products did not influence the risk of aGVHD or cGVHD or other transplantation outcomes when using an MSD or an 8/8-matched MUD. Subset analyses of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell doses were not possible given our small sample size.     

Impact of Graft Cell Dose on Transplant Outcomes following Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: Higher CD34+ Cell Doses Are Associated with Decreased Relapse Rates

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been increasingly used in the matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplant setting, but the impact of CD34⁺ cell dose on outcomes in this setting have not been well characterized. We analyzed 181 consecutive patients who underwent MUD-PBSC transplantation at the City of Hope between August 2000 to December 2004. Patients were conditioned with either full-intensity regimen or reduced-intensity regimen. There was a significant inverse relationship between higher CD34⁺ cell dose and faster neutrophil engraftment (r = −0.16, P = .035). By univariate analysis, a CD34⁺ cell dose ≥4.2 × 10⁶/kg (above the lowest quartile) was associated with significantly lower relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67, P = .0126), with a trend for corresponding improvement for disease-free survival (HR = 0.84, P = .12) but not overall survival (HR = 0.91, P = .46). The impact of the CD34⁺ cell dose remained significant in multivariate analysis. The higher CD34⁺ cell dose was significantly associated with faster recovery of absolute lymphocyte counts on day +30 posttransplant. Subset analysis demonstrated that the higher CD34⁺ cell dose was associated with (1) greater reduction in relapse in myeloid malignancies than that in lymphoid malignancies, (2) greater reduction in reduced-intensity conditioning than in full-intensity conditioning, (3) greater reduction in relapse when there is a inhibitory killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor ligand (iKIRL)-mismatch in the gravft-versus-host (GVH) direction, and (4) greater reduction in relapse when there is a lack of iKIRL, suggesting that the protective effect of CD34⁺ cell dose against relapse may be immune-mediated, possibly through NK cell recovery.