Clinical impact of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infections in solid organ transplant patients

Clinical consequences of ganciclovir resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections were studied during 2 large prophylactic trials consisting of 100 days of valganciclovir or ganciclovir prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The first one involved 301 high-risk (CMV donor seropositive/recipient seronegative) SOT recipients excluding lung transplants followed for 12 months, whereas the second one involved 80 lung transplant patients evaluated over 6 months. Among the 7 patients (4 non-lung and 3 lung transplant patients) carrying viruses with known ganciclovir-resistance [corrected] mutations in blood, adverse clinical outcome was only observed in the lung transplant recipients. Additionally, no CMV resistance mutations were observed in non-lung transplant patients receiving valganciclovir.     

Variable viral clearance despite adequate ganciclovir plasma levels during valganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus disease in D+/R- transplant recipients

Background  

Valganciclovir, the oral prodrug of ganciclovir, has been demonstrated equivalent to iv ganciclovir for CMV disease treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Variability in ganciclovir exposure achieved with valganciclovir could be implicated as a contributing factor for explaining variations in the therapeutic response. This prospective observational study aimed to correlate clinical and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load response (DNAemia) with ganciclovir plasma concentrations in patients treated with valganciclovir for CMV infection/disease.     

Once daily ganciclovir as initial pre-emptive therapy delayed until threshold CMV load > or =10000 copies/ml: a safe and effective strategy for allogeneic stem cell transplant patients

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) is emerging as the preferred screening method for detection of CMV viremia in patients following allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplant. However, there are currently no universally accepted QPCR treatment thresholds at which to start pre-emptive therapy. We report here results of a pre-emptive therapy strategy using ganciclovir (GCV) 5 mg/kg initiated once daily (ODG) delayed till a threshold CMV load of > or =10 000 copies/ml whole blood in clinically stable patients. Sixty-nine at risk patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. 48/69 (70%) patients had an initial episode of CMV viremia. 5/48 (10%) cleared viremia without requiring treatment. 28/43 (65%) patients requiring treatment initiated treatment with ODG. 17/28 (61%) patients successfully cleared CMV viremia on ODG, 10/28 (36%) patients required dose escalation to twice daily GCV for increasing viral loads. There were two cases of CMV disease (colitis) and no deaths due to CMV disease in patients initiating treatment with ODG. We conclude delaying pre-emptive therapy with ODG until whole blood QPCR> or =10 000 copies/ml is a safe and effective strategy for CMV viremia after allogeneic stem cell transplant in clinically stable patients.     

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA load predicts relapsing CMV infection after solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA load was analyzed as a marker for relapse of CMV infection in 24 solid organ transplant patients with CMV infection or disease who received a fixed 14-day course of intravenous ganciclovir. Viral load was measured in blood samples obtained before and at the completion of treatment. Eight (33%) of 24 patients developed relapsing CMV infection. Median pretreatment viral loads were higher in the relapsing group (80,150 copies/106 leukocytes) than in the nonrelapsing group (5500 copies/106 leukocytes; P=.007). The relapsing group also had persistent detectable viral DNA (median, 5810 copies/106 leukocytes) after treatment, whereas it was undetectable in the nonrelapsing group (P<. 0001). Primary CMV infection (seronegative recipients of seropositive organs, D+R-) was an independent marker for CMV relapse (P=.03), and these patients had higher pre- and posttreatment viral loads than did non-D+/R- patients (P<.0001 and P=.0014, respectively). CMV DNA load is a useful marker for individualizing antiviral treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients.     

Evaluation of viral load and antigenemia as markers for relapse cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a pathogen, commonly found in the donors and recipients of solid organ transplantation. CMV is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Relapsing episodes of CMV infection occur in 23-33% of transplant patients which is likely a reflection of incomplete suppression of viral replication following antiviral treatment with intravenous ganciclovir. We have studied CMV DNA load and antigenemia as markers for relapse of CMV infection in 49 renal transplant patients out of 68 with CMV infection who received a course of intravenous ganciclovir among 300 transplants carried out between January of 2001 and June of 2005. Viral load and antigenemia were measured in blood samples obtained before, during and at the completion of treatment. We also studied different viral load as predictors of relapse CMV infection. Twelve (24.5%) of 49 recipients developed relapsing CMV infection. The relapsing group had higher viral loads after treatment than the no relapsing group. There was no difference in antigenemia level between both groups. The viral loads before and during the treatment, the age and sex of donors and recipients, inmunosupresión, percentage of seronegative recipients with seropositive donors, duration of the therapy and the percentage of patients with heavy immunosuppression were similar in the two groups, but the incidence of acute rejection was higher in the relapsing group. We also evaluated the range of viral load after treatment which is able to trigger the relapse of CMV infection. We conclude that CMV DNA load after treatment is a useful marker for individualizing antiviral treatment of CMV infection in renal transplant recipients. Acute rejection is a risk factor to the relapsing CMV infection.     

Valganciclovir is safe and effective as pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Despite significant advances in prevention and therapy, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipient. The standard drug for pre-emptive therapy is intravenous ganciclovir (GCV). Valganciclovir (VGC), the oral pro-drug of GCV, has excellent bioavailability and is ideal for oral therapy. Since March 2002, VGC was adopted in our center for outpatient pre-emptive therapy in all patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Fifty-two allogeneic HSCT recipients were followed weekly via Digene hybrid capture assay. Patients with a positive assay were treated with VGC 900 mg p.o. b.i.d. x 14 days followed by 900 mg p.o. QD until at least 7 days after a negative test. Eighteen patients (14 sib, four MUD) had 30 episodes of CMV DNA detection treated with oral VGC. Median duration of therapy was 21 days (range 10-21 days). The rate of response was 93% (28/30) as confirmed by a negative assay within 14 days. No significant toxicity was encountered. Two patients failed oral VGC. One case of CMV enteritis was diagnosed in a patient with acute GVHD. Pre-emptive therapy of CMV infection with oral VGC is safe and effective in allogeneic HSCT recipients.     

Current concepts on cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen that negatively impacts on the outcome of liver transplantation. CMV cause febrile illness often accompanied by bone marrow suppression, and in some cases, invades tissues including the transplanted allograft. In addition, CMV has been significantly associated with an increased predisposition to allograft rejection, accelerated hepatitis C recurrence, and other opportunistic infections, as well as reduced overall patient and allograft survival. To negate the adverse effects of CMV on outcome, its prevention, whether through antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy, is regarded as an essential component to the medical management of liver transplant patients. Two recent guidelines have suggested that antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy are similarly effective in preventing CMV disease in modest-risk CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients, while antiviral prophylaxis is the preferred strategy over preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in high-risk recipients [CMV-seronegative recipients of liver allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-)]. However, antiviral prophylaxis has only delayed the onset of CMV disease in many CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients, and at least in one study, such occurrence of late-onset primary CMV disease was significantly associated with increased mortality after liver transplantation. Therefore, optimized strategies for prevention are needed, and aggressive treatment of CMV infection and disease should be pursued. The standard treatment of CMV disease consists of intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir, and if feasible, one should also reduce the degree of immunosuppression. In one recent controlled clinical trial, valganciclovir was found to be as effective and safe as intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of mild to moderate CMV disease in solid organ (including liver) transplant recipients. In this article, the authors review the current state and the future perspectives of prevention and treatment of CMV disease after liver transplantation.     

A prospective assessment of valganciclovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients

We assessed valganciclovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in organ-transplant recipients. Virologic and clinical outcomes were compared with those in matched historical control individuals. Thirty-two patients (23 with symptomatic disease) received valganciclovir, and 32 patients received intravenous (iv) ganciclovir. The rate of virologic clearance by day 21 of therapy was similar in the valganciclovir arm (50.0%) and the ganciclovir arm (46.9%) (P value not significant). The change from baseline viral load by day 7 and day 14 of therapy was similar in both arms. Two patients treated with valganciclovir required a switch to iv ganciclovir, because of a lack of response. Valganciclovir is useful for the treatment of CMV infection and disease in selected organ-transplant recipients.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in liver-transplanted children

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication of liver trans-plantation in children. The CMV serostatus of recipients and donors is the primary risk factor, and prophylaxis or pre-emptive strategies are recommended for high-risk patients. Graft rejection, coinfection and Epstein-Bar virus reactivation, which can lead to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, are indirect effects of CMV infection. Assessment of CMV infection viral load should be routinely performed upon clinical suspicion. However, tissue-invasive CMV disease is not associated with CMV viraemia and requires confirmation by tissue pathology. Oral valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir are equivalent treatments, and the duration of treatment depends on factors including CMV viral load, tissue pathology, and clinical response. Risk stratification by donor and recipient status prior to transplantation and post-transplantation antiviral prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy are recommended. Adult guidelines have been established but additional study of the effectiveness of the preventive guidelines in children is needed. This review summarizes the burden, risk factors, clinical manifestations, laboratory evaluation, treatment, and prevention of CMV infection in children after liver transplantation.     

Quantification of cytomegalovirus DNA in BAL fluid: a longitudinal study in lung transplant recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common in patients receiving solid organ transplants, and it is associated with increased morbidity as well as risk for development of chronic rejection. A rapid and sensitive diagnostic method would improve the therapeutic management of CMV infection, including the monitoring of treatment effects. We investigated whether longitudinal determinations of CMV DNA quantities in BAL fluid could be useful for this purpose. DESIGN: CMV DNA levels in 340 BAL samples from 35 consecutive lung transplant recipients were studied during a median of 18 months. Seventeen (49%) of the patients developed CMV disease with pneumonitis. Twenty-seven CMV disease episodes were diagnosed. RESULTS: Patients with CMV disease had a significantly higher mean level of CMV copies per milliliter BAL fluid (1,120 +/- 4,379) compared with those without (180 +/- 1,177, p < 0.01). Viral load as well as acute rejection requiring treatment (>/= A2) were independent risk factors associated with CMV disease. Differences between the groups concerning HLA-DR matching, basic immunosuppressive therapy, and CMV serologic status D/R -/+ vs D/R +/+ were not significant. A diagnostic definition of normality based on the mean level of all episodes without CMV disease +2 SD would discriminate only 9 of the 27 CMV episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the viral load is increased during episodes of clinical CMV disease in lung transplant recipients, the quantitative PCR assessment of CMV DNA in BAL fluid is not discriminative enough to be useful as a diagnostic tool for CMV disease.     

Management of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in liver transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus(CMV) is one of the most common viral pathogens causing clinical disease in liver transplant recipients, and contributing to substantial morbidity and occasional mortality. CMV causes febrile illness often accompanied by bone marrow suppression, and in some cases, invades tissues including the transplanted liver allograft. In addition, CMV has been significantly associated with an increased predisposition to acute and chronic allograft rejection, accelerated hepatitis C recurrence, and other opportunistic infections, as well as reduced overall patient and allograft survival. To negate the adverse effects of CMV infection on transplant outcome, its prevention, whether through antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy, is an essential component to the management of liver transplant recipients. Two recently updated guidelines have suggested that antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy are similarly effective in preventing CMV disease in modest-risk CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients, while antiviral prophylaxis is the preferredstrategy over preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in high-risk recipients [CMV-seronegative recipients of liver allografts from CMV-seropositive donors(D+/R-)]. However, antiviral prophylaxis has only delayed the onset of CMV disease in many CMV D+/Rliver transplant recipients, and such occurrence of lateonset CMV disease was significantly associated with increased all-cause and infection-related mortality after liver transplantation. Therefore, a search for better strategies for prevention, such as prolonged duration of antiviral prophylaxis, a hybrid approach(antiviral prophylaxis followed by preemptive therapy), or the use of immunologic measures to guide antiviral prophylaxis has been suggested to prevent late-onset CMV disease. The standard treatment of CMV disease consists of intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir, and if feasible, reduction in pharmacologic immunosuppression. In one clinical trial, oral valganciclovir was as effective as intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of mild to moderate CMV disease in solid organ(including liver) transplant recipients. The aim of this article is to provide a state-of-the art review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV infection and disease after liver transplantation.     

Ganciclovir‐resistant post‐transplant cytomegalovirus infection due to combined deletion mutation at codons 595‐596 of the UL97 gene

The development of antiviral‐resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection complicates the management of transplant recipients. We describe the case of a 65‐year‐old male who developed CMV disease on valganciclovir prophylaxis (donor CMV IgG positive, recipient CMV IgG indeterminate) 30 days after combined liver–kidney transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis and hepato‐renal syndrome. After an initial complete response to treatment dose oral valganciclovir, he developed recurrent CMV viraemia. Resistance testing revealed a UL97 mutation with in‐frame deletions of codons 595‐596. He was treated successfully with foscarnet and reduction in immunosuppression. This mutation has not been described previously and was suspected to confer ganciclovir resistance. Ganciclovir resistance occurs most commonly due to mutations in the UL97 or UL54 genes, which encode a protein kinase and a DNA polymerase, respectively. The UL97‐encoded protein kinase phosphorylates ganciclovir to ganciclovir triphosphate, which competitively inhibits viral replication. Mutations in the UL97 gene are typically point mutations or deletions. We describe a new mutation, del595‐596 in the CMV UL97 gene, occurring in the context of clinical treatment failure with standard and double‐dose ganciclovir, and successful virological control achieved with foscarnet. This mutation is likely to result in ganciclovir resistance, although recombinant phenotyping is required for confirmation.     

Assessment of disseminated adenovirus infections using quantitative plasma PCR in adult allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients receiving reduced intensity or myeloablative conditioning

OBJECTIVES: Disseminated adenovirus (AdV) infections following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) are increasingly recognised, particularly in children. This study evaluated the clinical relevance of disseminated AdV infections in adult allo-SCT recipients, after different conditioning regimens. METHODS: In a cohort of 107 adult allo-SCT recipients, receiving either reduced intensity conditioning (RIC, n = 48) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC, n = 59), AdV DNA levels in plasma were determined retrospectively at 1, 3 and 6 months following transplantation. Results of this screening regimen were compared with a cohort of 58 paediatric allo-SCT recipients, in whom AdV DNA load was monitored prospectively, as part of a pre-emptive treatment strategy. In positive cases, the course of AdV DNA load and clinical outcome were assessed. RESULTS: AdV DNA levels > or =1000 copies/mL were detected in five adults (4.7%) and eight children (13.8%). Screening for AdV viraemia at 1, 3 and 6 months would have detected seven of eight paediatric patients. One adult, receiving MAC, died with disseminated AdV disease and in four (three RIC and one MAC) AdV viraemia was transient without clinical symptoms specifically attributable to AdV. Seven paediatric patients with AdV viraemia were pre-emptively treated with ribavirin or cidofovir and in three of them disseminated AdV infection was related to a fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Disseminated AdV infections following allo-SCT was a rare event in the adults and cause morbidity in a minority of these patients. In four of five adult patients, spontaneous clearance of AdV viraemia occurred. Results did not differ between the conditioning regimens that were applied in the adult cohort.     

Absence of cytomegalovirus-resistance mutations after valganciclovir prophylaxis, in a prospective multicenter study of solid-organ transplant recipients

We investigated the emergence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) ganciclovir-resistance mutations in 301 high-risk solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients after oral prophylaxis, for 100 days, with either valganciclovir or ganciclovir. For patients treated with ganciclovir, the incidence of CMV UL97 mutations was 1.9% (2/103) at the end of prophylaxis and 6.1% (2/33) for patients with suspected CMV disease up to 1 year after transplantation. No resistance mutations were detected in samples from valganciclovir-treated patients. Dual polymerase (UL54) and UL97 resistance mutations were not seen. Valganciclovir was associated with negligible risk of resistance and thus constitutes a useful alternative to ganciclovir prophylaxis for CMV in high-risk SOT recipients.     

Does therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of trough concentrations suffice for optimizing preemptive therapy with ganciclovir of cytomegalovirus infections in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients?

Objectives

The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between ganciclovir exposure and clinical efficacy and/or safety in non-renal solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients receiving preemptive therapy with ganciclovir/valganciclovir and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing optimization.

Methods

Non-renal SOT recipients admitted to IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna receiving preemptive therapy with ganciclovir or valganciclovir for active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and who underwent at least one TDM were included. Desired ganciclovir C_min range was set at 1–3 mg/L, and average ganciclovir trough concentrations (C_min) were calculated for each patient. Reduced CMV viral load below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) at 30 days and occurrence of myelotoxicity were selected as the primary outcome. Univariate analysis was performed by comparing patients with average C_min below or above 1 or 3 mg/L. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the average ganciclovir C_min cut-off predictive for clinical efficacy or toxicity.

Results

Twenty-nine out of 89 retrieved patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median (interquartile [IQR]) baseline CMV viral load of 27,163 copies/mL (IQR 13 159.75–151 340.25 copies/mL). Reduced CMV viral load below the LLQ at 30 days was found in 17 patients (58.6%). No difference was found in the primary outcome between patients showing average C_min below or above 1 mg/L (100.0% vs. 53.8%; p = .25) and/or 3 mg/L (65.2% vs. 33.3%; p = .20). ROC analysis did not allow to identify an average C_min cut-off predictive of clinical efficacy or toxicity.

Conclusions

No clear relationship between ganciclovir C_min and neither CMV eradication nor safety issues was identified.

     

Effectiveness of ganciclovir against human herpesvirus-6 excreted in saliva in stem cell transplant recipients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ganciclovir on human herpesvirus-6 (HHV)-6. Forty allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients were prospectively studied by repeated sampling of the saliva. The saliva samples were assayed for HHV-6 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. HHV-6 was detected in 33 patients. Ganciclovir was given as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection during 15 episodes that were compared to 18 episodes without any concomitant antiviral therapy. The mean HHV-6 load decreased 0.49 (s.e. 0.31) log(10)/week in patients receiving ganciclovir whereas it increased 0.15 (s.e. 0.17) log(10)/week in episodes without antiviral therapy (P=0.04). We conclude that ganciclovir can decrease the HHV-6 viral load in saliva.     

Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation： Current concepts and challenges

Cytomegalovirus （CMV） is a common viral pathogen that influences the outcome of liver transplantation. In addition to the direct effects of CMV syndrome and tissue-invasive diseases, CMV is associated with an increased predisposition to acute and chronic allograft rejection, accelerated hepatitis C recurrence, and other opportunistic infections, as well as reduced overall patient and allograft survival. Risk factors for CMV disease are often interrelated, and include CMV D＋/R- serostatus, acute rejection, female gender, age, use of high-dose mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone, and the overall state of immunity. In addition to the role of CMV-specific CD4＋ and CD8＋ T lymphocytes, there are data to suggest that functionality of the innate immune system contributes to CMV disease pathogenesis. In one study, liver transplant recipients with a specific polymorphism in innate immune molecules known as Toll-like receptors were more likely to develop higher levels of CMV replication and clinical disease. Because of the direct and indirect adverse effects of CMV disease, its prevention, whether through antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy, is an essential component in improving the outcome of liver transplantation. In the majority of transplant centers, antiviral prophylaxis is the preferred strategy over preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in CMV-seronegative recipients of liver allografts from CMV-seropositive donors （D＋/R-）. However, the major drawback of antiviral prophylaxis is the occurrence of delayed-onset primary CMV disease. In several prospective and retrospective studies, the incidence of delayed-onset primary CMV disease ranged from 16% to 47% of CMV D＋/R- liver transplant recipients.Current data suggests that delayed-onset CMV disease is associated with increased mortality after liver transplantation. Therefore, optimized strategies for prevention and novel drugs with unique modes of action are needed. Currently, a randomized controlled clinical trial is being perf     

Relapsing cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Abstract:: Efforts to prevent relapsed cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients present clinical challenges. Historically, SOT recipients treated with short courses of ganciclovir, without documented clearance of viremia, had relapse rates of 23–33%. Current treatment often includes much longer courses of valganciclovir, and persistence of viremia at the end of treatment is rare. We sought to determine the rate and risk factors for relapse under those treatment conditions. Records of 1760 SOT recipients from January 2003 to June 2007 were reviewed; 105 cases of CMV viremia were identified. Relapse occurred in 20/105 (19%); 50% had end‐organ disease at the time of relapse. Most patients received approximately 3 months of valganciclovir. Clearance of viremia was documented in 19/20 patients with relapse. Multivariable analysis identified receipt of a thoracic organ and diabetes mellitus as risk factors for relapse. Despite long treatment courses with valganciclovir and documented clearance of viremia, CMV relapse remains common among SOT recipients. Better understanding of the epidemiology of CMV among SOT recipients and validation of risk factors for disease relapse should be the focus of future prospective trials. Such trials should include different treatment durations and extended monitoring for relapse.     

Early infections in adults undergoing matched related and matched unrelated/mismatched donor stem cell transplantation: a comparison of incidence

We compared the incidence of early infectious complications between matched related (MR) and matched unrelated/mismatched (MU/MM) allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) recipients in a single centre over a 6-year period in 214 consecutive adult patients. Early infections were defined as occurring from hospital admission for SCT until discharge. One hundred and fifty-nine patients received an allograft from MR donors and 55 patients received MU/MM allo-SCT. One hundred and eight of 214 patients had 147 episodes of fever. Ninety-three episodes (63%) were due to clinically or microbiologically documented infections and 54 episodes (37%) to fever not related to infection. Patients undergoing MU/MM transplantation tended to have more documented infections compared to recipients of MR allo-SCT (P = 0.06). Significantly more MU/MM transplant recipients had breakthrough infections with Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1, P = 0.003), and more CMV reactivation (P = 0.015). The mortality rate in all patients during hospitalisation post-SCT was 6.3% in MR and 18.2% in MU/MM allo-SCT recipients (P = 0.009). Early mortality was associated with infection in 70% of the patients, with a similar distribution between MR and MU/MM transplant recipients. However, MU/MM transplant recipients had significantly more early deaths due to toxic causes (P < 0.001). We conclude that early post-transplant MU/MM transplant recipients tend to have more documented infections, and have significantly more breakthrough infections with HSV-1 and more CMV reactivation. MU/MM transplant recipients are at higher risk of early mortality, especially due to toxic causes.     

Screening for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using a quantitative whole blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method: analysis of potential risk factors for CMV infection

Potential risk factors for CMV infection and the use of quantitative CMV PCR screening to guide pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy were reviewed retrospectively in 32 allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients accrued over a 2-year period. Significant CMV PCR positivity (an indicator of CMV infection) developed in 34% of patients. When analysed by recipient CMV IgG serostatus, 69% of seropositive recipients developed significant CMV PCR positivity while none of the seronegative recipients did so (P = 0.00007). Considering only the seropositive recipients, 100% of those who received the low intensity campath-1H/fludarabine/melphalan 'mini-allograft' conditioning regimen developed significant CMV PCR positivity, while only 44% of those who had received cyclophosphamide/TBI did so (P = 0.0337). The mean time to first episode of significant CMV PCR positivity for those who had received campath/fludarabine/melphalan was 25 days while for those who had received cyclophosphamide/TBI, this was 66 days (P = 0.0372). For the first episode of significant CMV PCR positivity, the mean index and peak CMV PCR counts for those who had received campath/fludarabine/melphalan were 4.54 and 5.22 log copies/ml respectively, while for cyclophosphamide/TBI, the corresponding figures were 3.85 and 4.12 log copies/ml respectively (P = 0.2986 and P = 0.0472 for index and peak values). 85% of those who had significant CMV PCR positivity with the campath/fludarabine/melphalan regimen developed more than one such episode, while 50% of those receiving cyclophosphamide/TBI regimen did so (P = 0.491). Significant CMV PCR positivity was associated with symptoms in a proportion of patients (pyrexia 45%, cough 18%, rise in AST 72%). No patient developed overt CMV disease. CMV PCR is useful for guiding pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy and for monitoring response.