Community-oriented primary care: critical assessment and implications for resident education

BACKGROUND: Community-oriented primary care (COPC) is a systematic approach to health care based on principles derived from epidemiology, primary care, preventive medicine, and health promotion that has been shown to have positive health benefits for communities in the United States and worldwide. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched using the key phrase "community-oriented primary care." Other sources of information were books and other documents. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Because of lack of predictable reimbursement for COPC services and difficulties encountered incorporating COPC in medical and residency curricula, widespread application of COPC has not occurred. Recent trends in public health initiatives, managed health care, and information technology provide an environment ripe for application of COPC in medical practice. Also, recent recommendations made by the Strategic Planning Working Group of the Academic Family Medicine Organizations and the Association of Family Practice Residency Directors regarding specific community competencies for residency training have direct bearing on COPC and family medicine educators. These trends and recommendations, properly configured, will produce a medical training and practice environment conducive to COPC.     

The National Area Health Education Center Program and Primary Care Residency Training

The Area Health Education Center (AHEC) program was established in 1972 to improve the supply, distribution, retention and quality of primary care and other health practitioners in medically underserved areas. Through academic/community partnerships, regional AHECs offer a broad array of educational programs for students, residents and practicing health professionals. With primary care medical education a core part of AHEC programs, AHECs have been involved in decentralized residency training from the outset, with particular attention to family medicine. This paper provides an overview of the national AHEC program, its core components and its support for primary care residency training. Although AHECs have achieved considerable success in training primary care physicians for their respective states, continued refinements of programs are needed to address the needs of the most rural and underserved communities.     

Geriatrics in family practice residency education: an unmet challenge

The aging of the US population poses one of the greatest future challenges for family practice residency graduates. At a time when our discipline should be strengthening geriatric education to address the needs of our aging population, the Group on Geriatric Education of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine believes that recent guidelines from important family medicine organizations suggest that our discipline's interest in geriatric education may be waning. Barriers to improving geriatric education in family practice residencies include limited geriatric faculty, changes in geriatric fellowship training, competing curricular demands, and limited diversity of geriatric training sites. Improving geriatric education in family practice residencies will require greater emphasis on faculty development and integration of geriatric principles throughout family practice residency education. The Residency Review Committee for Family Practice should review the Program Requirements for Residency Education to ensure that geriatric training requirements are consistent with current educational needs. The leadership of family medicine organizations should collaboratively address the need for continued improvement in training our residents to care for older patients and the chronically ill.     

Variations in content of care in a family medicine residency relating to types of insurance coverage

The content of care in a family practice residency program was analyzed using a microcomputer information system. The distribution of recorded diagnoses in the training program was found to be very similar to results of two national studies of family medicine. Despite this overall similarity, important differences were found when distributions for patients with six types of insurance coverages were analyzed separately. This study demonstrates the potential effect of insurance coverage on the clinical content of family medicine. As the health care system changes, residency programs will need to remain adaptable to maintain patient bases reflecting the broad content of family medicine.     

Obstetric care among family physicians in Pennsylvania. Trends, association with residency training, and policy implications

A study was designed to investigate the status of obstetric practice by Pennsylvania family physicians and its relationship to family practice residency training. A 50% probability sample of all family and general physicians and of all graduates of Pennsylvania family practice residency programs was surveyed by mail. Ten percent of Pennsylvania family physicians and general practitioners reported currently practicing obstetrics, 44% of whom said they planned to stop within 3 years. Telephone survey information from nonresponders suggests that even fewer (5%) of the state's family physicians may actually be practicing obstetrics. Family practice residency training, postresidency obstetric training, and small community size were the best predictors of current obstetric practice. Family physicians in the smallest communities, however, were also those most likely to be planning to stop, and graduates of residency programs were increasingly choosing not to practice obstetrics. Cost of liability insurance and fear of lawsuits were primary reasons cited for stopping obstetrics. Family physicians have been major providers of obstetric care in the nation's rural areas. Now, increasingly firm evidence that fewer family physicians are practicing obstetrics signals increasing shortages in obstetric care for women in rural communities. Changes in the practice climate and obstetric training programs for family physicians seem essential to help reverse these trends.     

Outpatient consultations from a family practice residency program: nine years' experience

Previous reports of consultation rates from family practice physicians have included small sample sizes and have suggested higher rates in residency training programs. This report summarizes 9 years of data involving 161 family practice physicians in a residency training program and shows an overall rate of 1.4 percent for outpatient consultations. Otolaryngology, orthopedics, obstetrics/gynecology, and general surgery were the most frequent disciplines consulted. These data are helpful in designing health care systems that include family practice residency programs.     

Graded exercise stress test training in family practice and internal medicine residencies

A mail survey of upper Midwest family practice and internal medicine residency program directors was performed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of exercise stress test training. Two mailings provided a 68% response rate for the 184 programs surveyed. Internal medicine programs were significantly more likely to offer exercise stress test training than family practice programs (57% vs 34%). Overall, an estimated 31% of family practice and internal medicine residency graduates are performing exercise stress tests in their practice. Programs provided an average of 7.3 hours of didactic instruction and 32.7 stress tests per resident. A minority (43%) had an established minimum number of exercise stress tests recommended for competency. Programs with and without exercise stress test training did not differ significantly with respect to age, size of program, or size of community. There were some interstate differences in the extent of exercise stress test training provided by family practice residency programs. Internal medicine programs were more likely to require a minimum number of treadmill tests. Otherwise there were few differences between family practice and internal medicine program instruction in exercise stress test training. Family practice program directors were more likely to believe that their residents should be taught this procedure and to include family physicians in their panel of instructors. Specific guidelines should be created to assure adequate stress test training for interested residents.     

Family Medicine Spokane Rural Training Track: 24 years of rural-based graduate medical education

Twenty percent of the US population lives in rural communities, but only about 9% of the nation's physicians practice in those communities. There is little doubt that the more highly specialized physicians are, the less likely they are to practice or settle in rural areas. There is clearly a population threshold below which it is not feasible for specialist (in contrast to generalist) physicians to pursue the specialty in which they have trained. Much of rural America falls below that threshold. This leaves large geographic areas of America to the primary care physician. The proportional supply of family physicians to specialists increases as urbanization decreases. Family physicians are the largest single source of physicians in rural areas. Family medicine residency programs based in rural locations provide a critical mechanism for addressing rural primary care needs. Graduates from rural residency programs are three times more likely to practice in rural areas than urban residency program graduates. There are two primary goals of training residents in rural areas: producing more physicians who will practice in rural areas and producing physicians who are better prepared for the personal and professional demands of rural practice. Rural Training Tracks, where the first year of residency is completed in an urban setting and the second and third years at a rural site (1-2 model), initially proposed by Family Medicine Spokane in 1985, have been highly successful in placing and maintaining more than 70% of their graduates in rural communities. Similar and modifications of the "Spokane RTT model" have been established around the country. Now, more than 24 years of educational experience has been accumulated and can be applied to further development of these successful family medicine residency programs.     

Use of a sports medicine clinic in a family practice residency

The experience of a pilot sports medicine clinic in affiliation with a family practice residency program is reviewed. The use of volunteer orthopedic staffing along with residents working in an acute sports medicine clinic in a community hospital proved to be a valuable addition to the orthopedic exposure during residency training. Seventy-eight patient contacts involving 93 injuries were encountered over a seven-week period. Three injuries required hospitalization for further definitive care. The benefits derived suggest that a similar clinic setup in other residency training programs could enhance the required orthopedic rotation as well as give acute, responsible care to the injured athlete. Educationally the resident's role as the athlete's physician provided a clinical experience valuable to a primary care practice.     

Developing primary care curricula in preventive medicine: some practical considerations.

I describe a practical approach to developing primary care curricular in preventive medicine, starting with the articulation of a rationale that relates training to current medical education, mortality, medical manpower, and health care system characteristics. I discuss recommended features of the ambulatory care setting for instruction and include automated record systems, practice teams, multidisciplinary staff, faculty role models, conferences and rounds, and needs of low-income populations. Further, I advocate a careful review of the three-year residency curriculum including conferences, rounds, and rotations to identify elements of the desired curriculum on which to build preventive medicine training so as to alter scheduling minimally. I consider longitudinal as well as block rotation experiences. I highlight published resources for defining preventive medicine content areas and recommend local resources for preventive medicine training and for involving residents in personal health promotion. Finally, I offer an example of a family medicine resident experience in breast and cervical cancer screening to illustrate an approach to accomplishing specific objectives for preventive medicine training.     

Forensic training in family practice residencies

Knowledge and skill in forensic medicine are important in primary care not only for defensive purposes but also because of potential therapeutic value in patient care. The major role in future mental health services envisioned for primary care physicians makes such training especially important. A national survey of family practice residency programs reveals that 47 percent of programs do not address forensic aspects of medical practice. A model forensic medicine curriculum is described that would require minimal adjustment of existing programs. The need for inclusion of forensically qualified clinicians in training programs for primary care physicians is evident.     

Geriatric medicine training for family practice residents in the 21st century: a report from the Residency Assistance Program/Harfford Geriatrics Initiative

Increasing the quality and quantity of geriatric medicine training for family practice residents is a particular challenge for community-based programs. With support from the John A. Hartford Foundation of New York City, the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) implemented in 1995 a multi-part project to improve the amount and quality of geriatric medicine education received by family practice residents. This report summarizes the initial results of the regional geriatric medicine curriculum retreats for residency directors. The goals of the retreats were to build recognition among the residency directors of the skills that future family physicians will require to be successful providers of primary care to older adults and to allow the residency directors to identify and develop solutions to barriers to improving geriatric medicine training for residents. Forty-six program directors participated in the three retreats between February 2000 and February 2001. The participants represented 52 programs and rural tracks in all geographic regions, small and large programs, and urban and rural settings. The program directors developed a consensus on the geriatric medicine knowledge, skills, and attitudes that should be expected of all family practice residency graduates; developed a list of basic, required educational resources for each family practice residency program; and proposed solutions to common obstacles to successful curriculum development.     

Benefits of comprehensive reproductive health education in family medicine residency

Given the high prevalence of unintended pregnancy and early pregnancy failure, family physicians frequently encounter these clinical problems. Early abortion care and miscarriage management are within the scope of family medicine, yet few family medicine residency programs' curricula routinely include training in these skills. Comprehensive reproductive health education for family physicians could benefit patients by improving access to safe care for unintended pregnancy and early pregnancy loss and by improving continuity of care, especially for rural and low-income women. By promoting reflection on conflicts between personal beliefs and responsibility to patients, training in options counseling and abortion care fosters patient-centered care and informed decision making. Managing pregnancy loss and termination also improves skills in patient-centered counseling and primary care gynecology. Multiple studies document the feasibility and success of several training models for abortion and miscarriage management in family medicine. Incorporating comprehensive reproductive health care into family medicine residency training enables family physicians to provide a full range of reproductive health services.     

Going global: considerations for introducing global health into family medicine training programs

Medical students and residents have shown increasing interest in international health experiences. Before attempting to establish a global health training program in a family medicine residency, program faculty must consider the goals of the international program, whether there are champions to support the program, the resources available, and the specific type of program that best fits with the residency. The program itself should include didactics, peer education, experiential learning in international and domestic settings, and methods for preparing learners and evaluating program outcomes. Several hurdles can be anticipated in developing global health programs, including finances, meeting curricular and supervision requirements, and issues related to employment law, liability, and sustainability.     

Postgraduate Medical Education for Rural Family Practice in Canada

Canada is a large country with a diverse and spread-out rural population. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural Canadians have fewer family doctors and dramatically fewer specialists, and they face other significant geographic barriers to accessing health care. This paper describes the milieu of the rural physician in Canada and reports on efforts to develop a postgraduate medical education model for rural family practice that will produce more physicians with the knowledge, skills and interest to practice in small and mid-sized communities. Key recommendations of the College of Family Physicians of Canada include: providing earlier and more extensive rural medicine experience for all undergraduate medical students, developing rural postgraduate training programs, providing third-year optional special and advanced rural family medicine skills training and making advanced family medicine skills training competency-based and nationally accredited.     

A Strategy to Increase the Number of Urban Family Practice Resident Physicians Who Enter Rural Practice

Physician geographic maldistribution is a problem in the United States health care system. Innovative strategies are needed to entice resident family physicians training in the larger, more numerous suburban and urban training programs to practice in rural areas upon completing their training. This paper describes a strategy used at St. Elizabeth Medical Center Family Practice Residency Program, Dayton, OH, to encourage rural practice. In the St. Elizabeth plan, the interested family practice resident moonlights in a rural practice provided by the local county hospital. The county medical staff covers the resident physician's practice during the frequent absences. The residency program faculty provide on-site supervision, telephone back-up coverage, and practice consultation. The county hospital provides billing services; the resident physician retains 100 percent of collections. The resident physician gains exposure to the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed in rural practice. Upon completion of residency training, the physician remains in practice and is not required to pay back any expenses incurred by the hospital. Two resident physicians participate currently; three others have expressed interest in practicing in the community. A similar plan might work in parts of the United States where, like Ohio, training programs and rural communities are not far apart.     

Restructuring the Ikeda City school urinary screening system: report of a screening survey

Background

Even though Japan faces serious challenges in women’s health care such as a rapidly aging population, attrition of obstetrical providers, and a harsh legal climate, few family medicine residency training programs in Japan include training in obstetrics, and the literature lacks research on women’s views of intra-partum pregnancy care by family physicians.

Findings

In this exploratory study, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with five women who received their admission, intrapartum, delivery and discharge care from family medicine residents in the obstetrics ward of a community training hospital. Four women had vaginal births, and one had a Cesarean section. Three were primiparous, and two multiparous. Their ages ranged from 22–33. They found value in family physician medical knowledge and easy communication style, though despite explanation, some had trouble understanding the family physician’s scope of work. These women identified negative aspects of the hospital environment, and wanted more anticipatory guidance about what to expect physically after birth, but were enthusiastic about seeing a family doctor after discharge.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate the feasibility of family medicine residents providing inpatient birth care in a community hospital, and that patients are receptive to family physicians providing that care as well after discharge. Women’s primary concerns relate mostly to hospital environment issues, and better understanding the care family physicians provide. This illustrates-areas for family physicians to work for improvements.     

Fixing family medicine residency training

The number of US medical students entering family medicine continues to decline. Despite the increased presence of family physicians on medical school faculty and increased exposure to family medicine during training, students still cite lack of respect and excessive knowledge base to master as reasons for not choosing our specialty. Specific changes must be made to family medicine residency training to make it more attractive to students and more compatible with the realities of practice today. These changes include eliminating maternity care as a requirement, lengthening training to 4 years, and reducing the number of residency slots available. These changes will ensure that graduating family physicians will be better prepared for practice, better qualified to obtain privileges in the hospital and clinic, and more respected by their colleagues and the public.     

The postgraduate education of physicians in preventive medicine

The Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee report projected a serious shortage of preventive medicine specialists in 1990, and the recommendations of a recent report from the Association of American Medical Colleges called for increased training of medical students in health promotion and disease prevention and in adapting to changes in health and health care. To help meet the need for physician manpower in preventive medicine a new residency was established at the State University of New York at Stony Brook in July 1983. The program features a structured approach to the practicum year, incorporating an organized core curriculum and opportunities for a varied field experience. In addition to the School of Medicine and University Hospital, major training sites include two large county health departments on Long Island, three community hospital departments of community medicine, a health maintenance organization as well as several neighborhood health centers, and community-based programs operated by these hospitals and health departments. The curriculum includes both longitudinal experiences at the medical school involving teaching, research, and didactic conferences, and block field rotations within the above affiliated agencies, providing practice experience in preventive medicine and public health. The diversity in the organization and type of preventive medicine institutions used for training enriches the residency experience and is complemented by core educational activities.