Fluoxetine for acute treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a placebo-controlled,randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: This report presents results from the acute treatment phase of a clinical trial designed to confirm efficacy of a fixed dose of 20 mg of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: After a 3-week screening period, 122 children and 97 adolescents with MDD ( ) were randomly assigned to placebo or fluoxetine. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, fluoxetine-treated patients received fluoxetine 10 mg/day for 1 week, then fluoxetine 20 mg/day for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Fluoxetine was associated with greater mean improvement in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) score than placebo after 1 week ( <.05) and throughout the study period. Significantly more fluoxetine-treated patients (41%) met the prospectively defined criteria for remission than did placebo-treated patients (20%) ( <.01). More fluoxetine- (65%) than placebo-treated (53%) patients met the prospectively defined response criterion of > or =30% decrease in CDRS-R score, but this difference was not significant ( =.093). Significantly more fluoxetine-than placebo-treated patients completed acute treatment ( =.001). There were no significant differences between treatment groups in discontinuations due to adverse events ( =.408). CONCLUSION: Fluoxetine 20 mg daily appears to be well tolerated and effective for acute treatment of MDD in child and adolescent outpatients. Fluoxetine is the only antidepressant that has demonstrated efficacy in two placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials of pediatric depression.     

Fluoxetine in early poststroke depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early poststroke depression (PSD) is a frequent and specific entity that impairs the rehabilitation and functional recovery of hemiplegic patients. This trial was designed to study the efficacy and tolerance of fluoxetine (FLX) in the treatment of early PSD. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Recent hemiplegic patients (<3 months) suffering from major depressive disorder (determined by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] >19) were randomized to receive either 20 mg/d fluoxetine (FLX) or placebo for 6 weeks. Patients were evaluated by use of the Motricity Index, Mini-Mental State Examination, Functional Independence Measure, and MADRS. Statistical analysis was performed by using an intent-to-treat approach comparing the 2 groups at day 0 (baseline) and days 15, 30, and 45 (end point). RESULTS: Of 121 patients screened, 31 were included in the study, 16 in the FLX group and 15 in the placebo group. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the 2 groups. The FLX-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients demonstrated significant improvement in mean MADRS scores at end point (11.8+/-6. 7 [mean+/-SD] versus 18.7+/-10.0, respectively; P=0.05). FLX-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients also demonstrated greater response rate (62.5% versus 33.3%, respectively) and greater mean decrease of MADRS (16.6 versus 8.4, respectively; P=0.02). There were no differences in motor, cognitive, or functional improvement and no significant side effects after FLX treatment, except for a patient with a moderate and transient increase of transaminases. CONCLUSIONS: FLX is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for early PSD. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment in this population.     

Fluoxetine treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents: a placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the efficacy and tolerability of fluoxetine in the acute treatment of child and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) during a 13-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHOD: Eligible patients aged 7 to 17 (N = 103) were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive either fluoxetine or placebo. Dosing was initiated at 10 mg daily for 2 weeks, then increased to 20 mg daily. After 4 weeks of treatment, and again after 7 weeks of treatment, non-responders could have their dosage increased by 20 mg daily, for a maximum possible dosage of 60 mg daily. Primary measure of efficacy was improvement in OCD symptoms as measured by the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). All analyses were intent-to-treat. RESULTS: Fluoxetine was associated with significantly greater improvement in OCD as assessed by the CY-BOCS (p = .026) and other measures than was placebo. Fluoxetine was well tolerated and had a rate of discontinuation for adverse events similar to that of placebo (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg daily was effective and well tolerated for treatment of OCD in this pediatric population.     

Fluoxetine versus placebo in preventing relapse of major depression in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared fluoxetine and placebo in continuation treatment to prevent relapse of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents. METHOD: After a detailed evaluation, children and adolescents 7-18 years of age with major depressive disorder were treated openly with fluoxetine. Those who had an adequate response after 12 weeks, as indicated by a Clinical Global Impression improvement score of 1 or 2 and a decrease of at least 50% in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised score, were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine or placebo for an additional 6 months. The primary outcome measures were relapse and time to relapse. Relapse was defined as either a score of 40 or higher on the Children's Depression Rating Scale with a history of 2 weeks of clinical deterioration, or clinical deterioration as judged by the clinician. Additional analyses were conducted with relapse defined only as a score of 40 or higher on the Children's Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: Of 168 participants enrolled in acute fluoxetine treatment, 102 were randomly assigned to continuation treatment with fluoxetine (N=50) or placebo (N=52). Of these, 21 participants (42.0%) in the fluoxetine group relapsed, compared with 36 (69.2%) in the placebo group, a significant difference. Similarly, under the stricter definition of relapse, fewer participants in the fluoxetine group relapsed (N=11; 22.0%) than in the placebo group (N=25; 48.1%). Time to relapse was significantly shorter in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Continuation treatment with fluoxetine was superior to placebo in preventing relapse and in increasing time to relapse in children and adolescents with major depression.     

Fluoxetine in children and adolescents with OCD: a placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of fluoxetine in child and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHOD: Between 1991 and 1998, 43 patients were randomly assigned to fluoxetine or placebo for 8 weeks. Dosing was fixed for the first 6 weeks (up to 60 mg/day) and then could be increased to 80 mg/day. Responders entered an 8-week maintenance phase. The primary outcome measures were the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Analyses were done on the intent-to-treat sample. RESULTS: Fluoxetine patients (n = 21) had significantly lower CY-BOCS scores than placebo patients (n = 22) after 16 (but not 8) weeks. Fluoxetine responders (n = 11) had significantly lower CY-BOCS scores than placebo responders (n = 7) after an additional 8 weeks of treatment. After 16 weeks, 57% of fluoxetine (versus 27% of placebo) patients were much or very much improved on the CGI-I scale (p <.05). No patient terminated the study because of adverse medication effects. CONCLUSION: Fluoxetine was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of child and adolescent OCD, but fluoxetine's full effect took more than 8 weeks to develop.     

Comparing and combining naltrexone and acamprosate in relapse prevention of alcoholism: a double-blind,placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Naltrexone and acamprosate have been shown to be effective in relapse prevention of alcoholism via different pharmacologic mechanisms. Since it remains uncertain whether both substances are equally efficient and whether a combination of both drugs potentiates the efficacy, we conducted the first published controlled study comparing and combining both compounds. METHODS: After detoxification, 160 patients with alcoholism participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol. Patients received naltrexone, acamprosate, naltrexone plus acamprosate, or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients were assessed weekly by interview, self-report, questionnaires, and laboratory screening. Time to first drink, time to relapse, and the cumulative abstinence time were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Naltrexone, acamprosate, and the combined medication were significantly more effective than placebo. Comparing the course of nonrelapse rates between naltrexone and acamprosate, the naltrexone group showed a tendency for a better outcome regarding time to first drink and time to relapse. The combined medication was most effective with significantly lower relapse rates than placebo and acamprosate but not naltrexone. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the efficacy of pharmacotherapeutic strategies in the relapse prevention of alcoholism. Naltrexone and acamprosate, especially in combination, considerably enhance the potential of relapse prevention.     

Fluoxetine is not effective in the treatment of post-stroke fatigue: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although post-stroke fatigue (PoSF) is common, pharmacological interventions to improve PoSF have rarely been carried out. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of fluoxetine on PoSF. METHODS: We studied 83 consecutive outpatients with PoSF at an average of 14 months after the onset of stroke. The presence of post-stroke depression, post-stroke emotional incontinence and post-stroke anger proneness was also evaluated with the use of a standardized questionnaire. The presence of PoSF and pre-stroke fatigue was assessed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) were used to assess PoSF. The subjects were given either 20 mg/day of fluoxetine (n = 40) or placebo (n = 43) for 3 months. Follow-up evaluations were done 3 and 6 months after the beginning of the treatment. RESULTS: The initial mean fatigue VAS score and the mean overall FSS score were 5.4 +/- 2.0 and 4.4 +/- 1.2, respectively. There were no differences in the number of patients with PoSF between the fluoxetine group and the placebo group at 3 and 6 months after the treatment. The percent changes in VAS scores and FSS at all follow-up assessments were not significantly different either. However, fluoxetine significantly improved post-stroke emotional incontinence (p < 0.05) and post-stroke depression (p = 0.05) in the patients with PoSF. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine does not improve PoSF, although some concomitant emotional disturbances improved significantly. Our results suggest that PoSF may be associated with diverse etiologies but not closely related to serotonergic dysfunction. Further studies are required to elucidate the causative factors and to find an appropriate treatment for PoSF.     

Risperidone for the treatment of acute mania in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Objectives:  To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of risperidone monotherapy for the treatment of an acute mixed or manic episode in children and adolescents with bipolar I disorder.
Methods:  This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3-arm study (N = 169) included children and adolescents (ages 10–17 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, experiencing a manic or mixed episode. Study participants were randomized to placebo (n = 58), risperidone 0.5–2.5 mg/day (n = 50), or risperidone 3–6 mg/day (n = 61) for 3 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score from baseline to end point. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring and scores on extrapyramidal symptom rating scales.
Results:  Improvement in mean YMRS total score was significantly greater in risperidone-treated subjects than in placebo-treated subjects [mean change (SD) −9.1 (11.0) for placebo; −18.5 (9.7) for risperidone 0.5–2.5 mg (p < 0.001); −16.5 (10.3) for risperidone 3–6 mg (p < 0.001)]. The most common risperidone-associated AEs were somnolence, headache, and fatigue. Mean (SD) weight gain was 0.7 (1.9) kg, 1.9 (1.7) kg, and 1.4 (2.4) kg in the placebo, risperidone 0.5–2.5 mg, and risperidone 3–6 mg groups, respectively, during this 3-week study.
Conclusions:  At daily doses of 0.5–2.5 mg and 3–6 mg, risperidone was effective and well tolerated in children and adolescents experiencing acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. Results indicate that risperidone 0.5–2.5 mg has a better benefit–risk profile than risperidone 3–6 mg.     

Paroxetine treatment in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of paroxetine for the treatment of pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. METHOD: Children (7-11 years of age) and adolescents (12-17 years of age) meeting DSM-IV criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder were randomized to paroxetine (10-50 mg/day) or placebo for 10 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) total score at week 10 last observation carried forward end point. Safety was assessed primarily through adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were randomized to treatment. Of these, 203 were included in the intention-to-treat population. Adjusted mean changes from baseline at week 10 observation carried forward end point in CY-BOCS total score for patients receiving paroxetine and placebo were -8.78 (SE=0.82) and -5.34 points (SE=0.77), respectively. The adjusted mean difference, -3.45 in favor of paroxetine, was statistically significant (95% confidence interval=-5.60 to -1.29, p=.002). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in intensity. A total of 10.2% (10/98) of patients in the paroxetine group and 2.9% (3 of 105) in the placebo group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents.     

Sertraline for prevention of depression recurrence in diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

CONTEXT: In patients with diabetes mellitus, depression is a prevalent and recurrent problem that adversely affects the medical prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether maintenance therapy with sertraline hydrochloride prevents recurrence of major depression in patients with diabetes. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, maintenance treatment trial. Patients who recovered from depression during open-label sertraline treatment continued to receive sertraline (n = 79) or placebo (n = 73) and were followed up for up to 52 weeks or until depression recurred. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at Washington University, St Louis, MO, the University of Washington, Seattle, and the University of Arizona, Tucson. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-two patients with diabetes (mean age, 52.8 years; 59.9% female; 82.9% with type 2 diabetes) who recovered from major depression (43.3% of those initially assigned) during 16 weeks of open-label treatment with sertraline (mean dose, 117.9 mg/d). INTERVENTION: Sertraline continued at recovery dose or identical-appearing placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was length of time (measured as the number of days after randomization) to recurrence of major depression as defined in DSM-IV. The secondary outcome was glycemic control, which was assessed via serial determinations of glycosylated hemoglobin levels. RESULTS: Sertraline conferred significantly greater prophylaxis against depression recurrence than did placebo (hazard ratio = 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.85; P = .02). Elapsed time before major depression recurred in one third of the patients increased from 57 days in patients who received placebo to 226 days in patients treated with sertraline. Glycosylated hemoglobin levels decreased during the open treatment phase (mean +/- SD glycosylated hemoglobin level reduction, -0.4% +/- 1.4%; P = .002). Glycosylated hemoglobin levels remained significantly lower than baseline during depression-free maintenance (P = .002) and did not differ between treatment groups (P = .90). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes, maintenance therapy with sertraline prolongs the depression-free interval following recovery from major depression. Depression recovery with sertraline as well as sustained remission with or without treatment are associated with improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin levels for at least 1 year.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of risperidone maintenance treatment in children and adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the effects of maintenance versus withdrawal of risperidone treatment in children and adolescents with symptoms of disruptive behavior disorder. METHOD: Patients with disruptive behavior disorder (5-17 years of age and a range of intellect) who had responded to risperidone treatment over 12 weeks were randomly assigned to 6 months of double-blind treatment with either risperidone or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was time to symptom recurrence, defined as sustained deterioration on either the Clinical Global Impression severity rating (/2 points) or the conduct problem subscale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (/7 points). Secondary efficacy measures included rates of discontinuation due to symptom recurrence, disruptive behavior disorder symptoms, and general function. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Risperidone dosage was based on weight (patients <50 kg: 0.25-0.75 mg/day; patients /50 kg: 0.5-1.5 mg/day). RESULTS: Treatment was initiated in 527 patients, with 335 randomly assigned to a double-blind maintenance condition. Time to symptom recurrence was significantly longer in patients who continued risperidone treatment than in those switched to placebo. Symptom recurrence in 25% of patients occurred after 119 days with risperidone and 37 days with placebo. Secondary efficacy measures also favored risperidone over placebo. Weight increased over the initial 12 weeks of treatment (mean weight z score change=0.2, SD=2.7, N=511), after which it plateaued. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first placebo-controlled maintenance versus withdrawal trial of its kind in disruptive behavior disorder and provides evidence that patients who respond to initial treatment with risperidone would benefit from continuous treatment over the longer term.     

Paroxetine treatment in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine in pediatric major depressive disorder. METHOD: Subjects 7 to 17 years old with major depressive disorder received paroxetine (10-50 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks from 2000 to 2001. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised total score at week 8 last observation carried forward). Safety was primarily assessed by spontaneous reporting of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (intent to treat) were randomized to paroxetine (n = 104) or placebo (n = 102). Week 8 Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised total score adjusted mean changes from baseline for patients receiving paroxetine and placebo were -22.58 (SE 1.47) and -23.38 points (SE 1.60), respectively (0.80, 95% confidence interval -3.09 to 4.69, p = 0.684). Increased cough (5.9% versus 2.9%), dyspepsia (5.9% versus 2.9%), vomiting (5.9% versus 2.0%), and dizziness (5.0% versus 1.0%) occurred in >or=5% of the paroxetine group and at least twice that of the placebo group. Six of 104 (5.8%) paroxetine patients reported serious adverse events compared to 1 placebo patient (1.0%). The incidence of adverse events of suicidal behavior and/or ideation while taking study medication (excluding taper) was 1.92% (2/104) for paroxetine versus 0.98% (1/102) for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine was not shown to be more efficacious than placebo for treating pediatric major depressive disorder.     

Slow right prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for medication-resistant depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Over the past decade, efforts have been made to assess the positive therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) by altering the excitability of the brain. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of right prefrontal slow repetitive TMS in patients with treatment refractory major depression. This pilot study supports the therapeutic potential of rTMS in the low-frequency range of 1 Hz on right prefrontal cortex for the treatment of refractory major depression. Additional studies will be necessary to assess the efficacy of rTMS with different indices (frequency, intensity, and stimulation site) for major depression and other psychiatric diseases.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of memantine in the treatment of major depression

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess possible antidepressant effects of memantine, a selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist in humans. METHOD: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 32 subjects with major depression were randomly assigned to receive memantine (5-20 mg/day) (N=16) or placebo (N=16) for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy was assessed by performance on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: The linear mixed models for total MADRS scores showed no treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: In an 8-week trial, the low-to-moderate-affinity NMDA antagonist memantine in doses of 5-20 mg/day was not effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder.