Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcers: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis--results from a randomized trial with 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE: The proportion of Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcer disease appears to be increasing. Data on clinical outcome and prognosis in this subgroup are lacking. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-six duodenal ulcer patients randomized, irrespective of H. pylori status, to either eradication therapy or maintenance omeprazole (double-blind, double-dummy design) for 1 yr were studied. Patients were followed up for a total of 2 yr, with visits performed every 2 months the first year and every 6 months the following year. Endoscopies for assessment of ulcer relapse were done at 6 and 12 months or in the event of symptomatic relapse. H. pylori status was assessed by culture, immunohistochemistry, and urea breath test at entry, at 6, 12, and 24 months or at failure. The primary endpoint was discontinuation, irrespective of reason. Patients were considered H. pylori negative if all three tests were negative. Patients were considered H. pylori-positive if any of the three diagnostic tests were positive. Study staff were blinded to H. pylori results. RESULTS: Thirty-two (12%) patients were H. pylori negative at entry. There were no differences according to H. pylori status for a number of clinical and demographic characteristics. However, H. pylori-negative patients had a shorter history of ulcer symptoms and were more likely to be NSAID users (19% vs 1%, p < 0.001). Only 28% of the H. pylori-negative patients completed the study, as compared with 40% of H. pylori-positive patients (p = 0.0005). The main reasons for the poorer prognosis in H. pylori-negative patients were relapse of ulcer/ulcer not healed (35% vs 26%) and relapse of severe dyspepsia symptoms without ulcer relapse (16% vs 7%). H. pylori-negative patients randomized to eradication therapy left the study early compared with H. pylori-negative patients randomized to long-term omeprazole therapy. Outcome in omeprazole-treated patients did not differ according to H. pylori status (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics in H. pylori-negative and positive duodenal ulcer patients differ little. Clinical outcome over 2 yr is significantly poorer in H. pylori-negative patients, especially if treated empirically with eradication therapy. These results suggest that H. pylori infection should be assessed in all duodenal ulcer patients before treatment is decided.     

A four-year follow-up of duodenal ulcer patients after Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical course of disease in 63 duodenal ulcer (DU) patients during a 4-year follow-up after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. METHODOLOGY: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and a clinical interview were performed before antimicrobial therapy, 2 months after, yearly and when symptoms recurred. Two antral and two corporal specimens were taken for histology, and one additional specimen from antrum was taken for rapid urease test at the first endoscopy and for culture at the following endoscopies. All patients received triple antimicrobial regimens based on colloidal bismuth subcitrate, amoxycillin and metronidazole for at least 2 weeks. Patients with a negative histology and culture 2 months after antimicrobial therapy were included in the study. RESULTS: After H. pylori eradication, ulcer recurrence dropped from 84.1% per year in the year before H. pylori eradication to a mean value of 5.2% per year during 2076 patient months (p<0.01). The increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was found only in the first year of the follow-up period. The average percentage of anti-ulcer drug users per year was 30.8% because of GERD, reflux symptoms, ulcer recurrence or non-ulcer dyspepsia. Ulcers or acute erosions recurred in 9 H. pylori-negative patients; recurrences were attributable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in 4 out of 9 cases (44.4%). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication changed the long-term course of DU disease.     

Role of Helicobacter pylori in ulcer healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcers in longterm NSAID users. Response to omeprazole dual therapy.

BACKGROUND: The relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated peptic ulcers remains unclear; in particular, it is not known whether H pylori plays a part in the healing and recurrence of these ulcers. AIMS: To evaluate prospectively in a consecutive series of arthritis patients receiving longterm NSAID treatment the prevalence of peptic ulcer as well as the effect of H pylori eradication on the healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer found. PATIENTS: Some 278 consecutive patients underwent gastroscopy with multiple biopsies of the gastric antrum and corpus for histological examination and rapid urease test. One hundred peptic ulcers (59 gastric ulcers, 39 duodenal ulcers, and two gastric ulcers concomitant with a duodenal ulcer) were found. Seventy per cent of these ulcers were H pylori positive. METHODS: According to their H pylori status, ulcer patients were randomised to one of the following treatments: H pylori negative ulcers received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for four to eight weeks, whereas H pylori positive lesions were treated with omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus amoxycillin 1 g twice daily (the second of these for the first two weeks) or omeprazole alone for four to eight weeks while continuing NSAID therapy. Patients with healed ulcers were endoscopically followed up for six months after stopping antiulcer therapy while continuing NSAIDs. RESULTS: Endoscopic healing rates for gastric and duodenal ulcers in the three different groups were similar both at four and eight weeks. H pylori eradication did not influence healing, which occurred in 14 of 20 (70%) of patients in whom H pylori was eradicated, compared with 14 of 17 (82%) of patients with persistent infection. Cumulative recurrence rates at six months did not statistically differ among the three different groups (27% in H pylori negative, 46% in H pylori positive, and 31% in those where H pylori was eradicated during the healing phase), although a numerical trend in favour of a higher recurrence rate in infected patients was evident. CONCLUSIONS: H pylori eradication does not confer any significant advantage on the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with longterm NSAID use. It remains to be established with certainty whether eradication may be helpful in the reduction of recurrence in a specific subset of NSAID associated ulcer.     

Symptomatic benefit 1-3 years after H. pylori eradication in ulcer patients: impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection markedly reduces the recurrence of duodenal and gastric ulcers. However, there is little information regarding its efficacy in resolving dyspeptic symptoms in ulcer patients. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of eradicating H. pylori infection on dyspeptic symptoms in ulcer patients. The secondary aim was to identify predictors of symptomatic response to H. pylori eradication. METHODS: A total of 97 dyspeptic patients with active duodenal and/or gastric ulceration associated with H. pylori infection and unrelated to NSAID use had the severity and character of their dyspeptic symptoms measured before and again 1-3 yr after H. pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: Pretreatment, the median dyspepsia score was 12 (4-16). Posttreatment, 55% of those eradicated of H. pylori had resolution of dyspepsia (score <2) compared with 18% of those not eradicated of the infection (95% CI for difference, 11-62%). Of the ulcer patients 31% had symptoms and/or endoscopic evidence of coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at initial presentation and this influenced the symptomatic response to eradication of H. pylori. Of the 22 patients with heartburn or acid reflux as the predominant presenting symptom, but no endoscopic esophagitis, only 27% experienced resolution of dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication, compared with 68% of the 59 without those as predominant symptoms (95% CI for difference, 18-63%). Only one of the five patients with coexisting endoscopic esophagitis at initial presentation experienced resolution of dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication. Symptomatic benefit was unrelated to time lapsed since the infection was eradicated. Only three of 50 subjects developed de novo GERD symptoms after eradication of H. pylori, whereas 21 of 36 subjects experienced resolution of GERD symptoms after eradication of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of ulcer patients have symptoms and/or signs of coexisting GERD at initial presentation and this reduces the symptomatic benefit from H. pylori eradication. However, we have found no evidence that eradicating H. pylori induces de novo GERD symptoms in ulcer patients.     

Helicobacter pylori infection delays ulcer healing in patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: A majority of duodenal ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori infection; eradication of the infection improves ulcer healing and reduces the ulcer recurrence rate. However, the frequency of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer is not clearly established. We studied the frequency of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer and its impact on their clinical presentation. METHODS: All patients presenting with perforated duodenal ulcer underwent emergency laparotomy and simple omental patch repair. Postoperatively they received standard antibiotics for 1-2 weeks along with ranitidine; ranitidine alone was continued thereafter till an endoscopy 4-6 weeks later. Positive rapid urease test along with identification of H. pylori on histology was taken as evidence of H. pylori infection. Patients who received anti-H. pylori therapy or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) postoperatively and/or proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics, during 4 weeks preceding the endoscopy, were excluded. RESULTS: 30 patients (27 men; mean [SD] age 32.9 [9.7 years]) presenting during the period June 1999 to October 2000 were studied. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was done 10.9 (6.3) weeks after surgery. Seventeen (56.6%) patients were infected with H. pylori; this group had significantly more men (17/17 versus 10/13 among uninfected) and fewer NSAID users (2/17 vs. 7/13). Median duration of epigastric pain before presentation was 18 weeks in the H. pylori-infected group as compared to one week in the non-infected group (p<0.001). Significantly more patients continued to have epigastric pain after surgery in the infected group (7/17 vs. 0/13). At endoscopy, active duodenal ulcer was present in 13 of 17 patients with evidence of H. pylori infection and none of the noninfected patients (p<0.001). Age, sex, duration between surgery and endoscopy, NSAID use, smoking and maintenance ranitidine use had no impact on ulcer healing after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer, H. pylori infection was the only significant factor responsible for persistence of ulcer after surgery. We advocate H. pylori eradication therapy in patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer.     

Helicobacter pylori and bleeding duodenal ulcer: prevalence of the infection and role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND: Several authors have reported low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Our aim was to study the prevalence of H. pylori in bleeding duodenal ulcer (DU), with both invasive and non-invasive methods, and to assess the role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: Ninety-two patients with bleeding DU were prospectively studied. The use of NSAIDs was evaluated by specific questionnaire. As a control group, 428 patients undergoing outpatient evaluation for the investigation of dyspepsia and found to have a DU at endoscopy were included. At endoscopy, two antral biopsies were obtained (H&E stain). A 13C-urea breath test was carried out in all patients. Breath test was repeated in patients treated with omeprazole during the hospitalization if H. pylori was not detected with the first test. RESULTS: Gastric biopsies could be obtained in 39 patients with UGIB. Three patients with UGIB treated with omeprazole and being H. pylori-negative with the first breath test were finally considered infected with the second test. Overall, 92.4% (95% CI, 85%-96%) of the patients with UGIB were infected (89.7% with histology and 92.4% with breath test (P = 0.15)). Concordance kappa value for both diagnostic tests was 0.64. NSAID intake was more frequent in patients with UGIB (34%) than in those without UGIB (5.6%) (P < 0.001), while H. pylori infection was less frequent in patients with UGIB (92.4% (85%-96%)) than in those without UGIB (99.1% (98%-100%); P < 0.001). Even in patients with UGIB, NSAID intake was the only risk factor in 5% of cases. The proportion of cases without H. pylori infection and without NSAID intake was very low in both bleeding and non-bleeding ulcers (2% and 0.5%, respectively; P = 0.146). H. pylori prevalence in bleeding ulcers was of 84% (67%-93%) in patients with NSAID intake, and 96.7% (89%-99%) when patients taking NSAIDs were excluded. In the multivariate analysis, NSAID intake (odds ratio, 9.8 (5.2-18.4)) correlated with UGIB; however, neither H. pylori status nor the interaction between H. pylori infection and NSAID intake correlated with UGIB. In the multivariate analysis in the subgroup of patients with UGIB, NSAID use was the only variable which correlated with H. pylori prevalence (odds ratio, 0.18 (0.03-0.97)). CONCLUSIONS: The most important factor associated with H. pylori-negative bleeding DU is NSAID use, and if this factor is excluded prevalence of infection is almost 100% (97%), similar to that found in patients with non-bleeding DU (and without NSAID intake). Bleeding DU patients with neither H. pylori infection nor NSAID use are extremely rare (only 2%), which suggests that the pathogenesis of bleeding DU is similar to that of non-complicated DU disease.     

Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the long-term outcome of peptic ulcer after successful eradication in Japan.

Recurrence of peptic ulcer after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori is closely associated with reinfection. The aim of this study was to examine the recurrence of peptic ulcer and reinfection with H. pylori after successful eradication. To eradicate H. pylori infection, patients with active peptic ulcer disease were assigned to two treatment groups depending on the year of their enrollment (AM group and OAMR group). Patients in the AM group received 400 mg of cimetidine twice per day, 300 mg of amoxicillin three times per day, and 250 mg of metronidazole three times per day for 2 weeks. Patients in the OAMR group received 20 mg of omeprazole once per day, 500 mg of amoxicillin granules three times per day, 250 mg of metronidazole three times per day, and 150 mg of roxithromycin twice per day for 1 week. After endoscopy verified ulcer scarring and successful eradication of H. pylori infection, study patients were followed up monthly and did not undergo acid-suppressive therapy. Endoscopy was performed at 6-month intervals for the 1st year. After the 1st year, follow-up endoscopies were performed annually. In total, 107 patients with peptic ulcer (duodenal ulcer [DU], 65; gastric ulcer [GU], 42) were followed up for a mean period of approximately 2 years. Recurrence of infection occurred in 10 (9.3%) of 107 patients (AM group, 9; OAMR group, 1) after 210 patient-years of follow-up; the recurrence rate was 4.8% per patient-year. Recurrence of H. pylori infection was significantly higher in the AM group (23.1%) than in the OAMR group (1.5%). H. pylori infection recurred in two patients 6 months after eradication therapy, in seven 1 year after, and in one 2 years after. Thereafter, no further cases of H. pylori recurrence were observed. During follow-up periods, seven cases of ulcer recurrence were observed (DU, 4; GU, 3). The rate of peptic ulcer recurrence within 2 years after eradication therapy was significantly higher than that after more than 2 years. Four cases of ulcer recurrence (DU, 3; GU, 1) also had recurrence of H. pylori infection. One recurrent case of DU without reinfection was associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The remaining two cases of GU recurred without H. pylori reinfection. In conclusion, peptic ulcer recurrence rarely occurred (3 [2.9%] of 103) in patients cured of H. pylori infection. Reinfection after apparent successful eradication was rarely noted when a powerful therapeutic regimen in eradication was used. Therefore, to eradicate H. pylori, a highly effective therapeutic regimen should always be used.     

Helicobacter pylori, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and smoking in risk pattern of gastroduodenal ulcers

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori, NSAID and cigarette smoking are major risk factors for gastroduodenal ulcers. However, the results of studies on the interaction between these factors on ulcerogenesis are controversial. This study was designed to examine the association between gastroduodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection, NSAID use, smoking and age. METHODS: 5967 dyspeptic patients underwent 13C-urea breath test (UBT) and upper endoscopy, while age and dyspeptic symptoms were reported. RESULTS: Out of 5967 patients, 31.8% were ulcerated; 9.2% had gastric, 17.2% duodenal and 5.4% both gastric and duodenal ulcers. H. pylori was found in 72.5% of gastric ulcer patients, in 83.6% of duodenal ulcer patients, in 76.9% of gastroduodenal ulcer patients and in 64.8% of dyspeptic patients. The gastric, duodenal and gastroduodenal ulcers were related to H. pylori significantly and the respective ORs were: 1.44, 2.77 and 1.81. NSAID alone was used by 6.2%-12.7% of ulcer patients, tending to raise only the risk of gastric ulcer but reducing that of duodenal and gastroduodenal ulcers. The H. pylori prevalence was significantly higher in smokers (76%) than in non-smokers (67%) and the ulcer risk was also significantly higher in smokers than in non-smokers. About 20% of ulcers were 'idiopathic', i.e. without NSAID and H. pylori and the ratio of these ulcers to all ulcers significantly increased during the 5 years of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Based on multivariable logistic regression analysis we conclude that: 1) H. pylori infection, NSAID use, smoking and age play major roles in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcerations; 2) there is a negative interaction between H. pylori and NSAID on duodenal ulcers, suggesting that H. pylori reduces the development of these ulcers in NSAID users, and 3) about 20% of peptic ulcers in the Polish population are unrelated to H. pylori and NSAID use (idiopathic ulcers).     

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and its effect on symptoms and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced gastrointestinal damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter (H pylori) are both associated with an increased risk of peptic ulceration and gastropathy. It is not known, however, if there is an interaction between these two agents, and thus whether or not screening for H pylori before NSAID treatment is of value. The aim of this study was to find out if H pylori potentiates the damaging effects of NSAIDs. Fifty two patients with rheumatoid arthritis requiring longterm NSAID treatment were studied. Dyspeptic symptoms were assessed according to a standardised questionnaire. Gastroscopy was performed after a one week washout period during which NSAIDs were discontinued. Gastric and duodenal mucosal damage was graded endoscopically. H pylori was identified by biopsy urease test and by histological tests. Investigations were repeated after one month's treatment with an NSAID. Patients with H pylori infection (n = 26) had a higher dyspeptic symptom score (p < 0.05). One patient with duodenal ulcer (H pylori +ve) and two with endoscopic gastritis (both H pylori +ve) were excluded from further study. Forty two subjects completed the study. After treatment there was a rise in the gastric damage score both in the H pylori +ve (p = 0.06) and the H pylori -ve (p < 0.005) groups. There was no difference in the extent of increase in grade or the final grade at the end of the treatment period between the H pylori +ve and -ve patients. It is concluded that H pylori infection is associated with increased dyspeptic symptoms in patients receiving NSAIDs but that it does not potentiate NSAID gastropathy.     

Helicobacter pylori Reinfection Rate, in Patients with Cured Duodenal Ulcer

Objective: To determine the reinfection rate of the gastric mucosa in patients previously cured of duodenal ulcers, following the eradication oi Helicobacter pylori . Only those remaining H. pylori-negative beyond 12 months of follow-up were studied, to minimize the potential inclusion of patients with H. pylori recrudescence. Methods: Patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers who had heen treated with triple therapy, resulting in documented eradication of H. pylori and cure of the ulcer for at least 4 years, were recalled and had their H. pylori status determined by the ¹⁴C-urea breath test. Those found positive for H. pylori underwent endoscopic confirmation of the infection. Results: Of the 94 patients restudied, with a follow-up period range of 48–96 months or a total of 549.8 yr, only two (2.2%) were again H. pylori positive. This gives an effective reinfection rate of 0.36% per patient year. In the two H. Pylori -positive patients, one had normal mucosa endoscopically, whereas duodenitis without active ulceration was present in the other. The former was asymptomatic, whereas the latter patient was using ranitidine daily for symptom control. Conclusion: In the Australian setting, following cure of duodenal ulcer disease by eradication of H. pylori , subsequent reinfection is an unusual phenomenon. We conclude that efforts aimed at eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer are justified and are worthwhile.     

CagA and VacA Helicobacter pylori antibodies in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Infection with different genotypes of virulent Helicobacter pylori strains (cytotoxin-associated gene A [CagA]- and/or vacuolating cytotoxin A [VacA]-positive) can play a role in the development of atrophic gastritis, duodenal ulcer (DU) and gastric cancer (GC). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with GC and H pylori-negative histological staining had previously been infected with H pylori CagA- and/or VacA-positive virulent strains. METHODS: Twenty-three GC patients with a mean (+/- SD) age of 68.14+/-9.8 years who tested H pylori-negative on histological staining took part in the study. Three control groups were included. The first group comprised 19 patients with past H pylori infection and DUs eradicated 10 years earlier, with a mean age of 58+/-18.2 years. H pylori-negative status for this group was determined every year with Giemsa staining, and follow-up testing occured 120+/-32 months (mean +/- SD) after therapy. The subsequent control groups included 20 asymptomatic children, with a mean age of 7+/-4.47 years, and with H pylori-negative fecal tests; the final group contained 30 patients without clinical symptoms of H pylori infection, with a mean age of 68+/-11.6 years, who tested H pylori-negative by histological staining. RESULTS: Prevalence of CagA and VacA seropositivity, respectively was 82.6% and 73.91% in GC patients; 84.2% and 84.2% in H pylori-negative DU patients; 25% and 5% in H pylori-negative children; and 36.6% and 16.6% in the patients without clinical symptoms on histological staining. CagA and VacA antibody positivity was not significantly different between GC patients and patients with DUs that had been eradicated 10 years earlier. Significant positivity was found between the children's group and the H pylori-negative (with past DUs) group (P<0.001). A statistically significant difference was found in age between groups (P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GC, even when H pylori-negative at the time of the present study, may have been infected by H pylori before the onset of the disease, as confirmed by CagA and VacA seropositivity. These data reinforce the hypothesis that H pylori may be a direct carcinogenic agent of GC.     

Prevalence of Peptic Ulcer in Dyspeptic Patients and the Influence of Age,Sex, and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis> Infection

We investigated the prevalence of peptic ulcer in dyspeptic patients in China to analyze the influence of age, sex, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The results showed that the prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcer increased with age. In patients under 60 years old, the prevalence of duodenal and gastric ulcers in females was markedly lower than that in males, especially the prevalence of duodenal ulcer. The prevalence of duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer in H. pylori-infected patients was markedly higher than in patients without H. pylori infection. In the patients under 60 years old, sex differences were still seen in both H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. The prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcers was markedly increased with age in both H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, male sex, and H. pylori infection were three independent risk factors for gastric and duodenal ulcers.     

Helicobacter pylori,Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Smoking in Risk Pattern of Gastroduodenal Ulcers

Background: Helicobacter pylori , NSAID and cigarette smoking are major risk factors for gastroduodenal ulcers. However, the results of studies on the interaction between these factors on ulcerogenesis are controversial. This study was designed to examine the association between gastroduodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection, NSAID use, smoking and age. Methods: 5967 dyspeptic patients underwent 13 C-urea breath test (UBT) and upper endoscopy, while age and dyspeptic symptoms were reported. Results: Out of 5967 patients, 31.8% were ulcerated; 9.2% had gastric, 17.2% duodenal and 5.4% both gastric and duodenal ulcers. H. pylori was found in 72.5% of gastric ulcer patients, in 83.6% of duodenal ulcer patients, in 76.9% of gastroduodenal ulcer patients and in 64.8% of dyspeptic patients. The gastric, duodenal and gastroduodenal ulcers were related to H. pylori significantly and the respective ORs were: 1.44, 2.77 and 1.81. NSAID alone was used by 6.2%-12.7% of ulcer patients, tending to raise only the risk of gastric ulcer but reducing that of duodenal and gastroduodenal ulcers. The H. pylori prevalence was significantly higher in smokers (76%) than in non-smokers (67%) and the ulcer risk was also significantly higher in smokers than in non-smokers. About 20% of ulcers were 'idiopathic', i.e. without NSAID and H. pylori and the ratio of these ulcers to all ulcers significantly increased during the 5 years of the study. Conclusions: Based on multivariable logistic regression analysis we conclude that: 1) H. pylori infection, NSAID use, smoking and age play major roles in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcerations; 2) there is a negative interaction between H. pylori and NSAID on duodenal ulcers, suggesting that H. pylori reduces the development of these ulcers in NSAID users, and 3) about 20% of peptic ulcers in the Polish population are unrelated to H. pylori and NSAID use (idiopathic ulcers).     

Prevalence of non-Helicobacter pylori duodenal ulcer in Karachi, Pakistan

AIM:To determine the prevalence of non-Helicobacter pylori (H pylori)-related duodenal ulcer in patients with acid-peptic diseases. METHODS: Medical records of patients who attended the Gastroenterology Department at Aga Khan University Hospital from 1999 to 2001 and had endoscopic diagnosis of duodenal ulcers were reviewed. Duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori was diagnosed on the basis of endoscopy, rapid urease test and histopathology whereas histories of aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) related duodenal ulcers. Non-H pylori, non-NSAID duodenal ulcers were those without H pylori infection and history of NSAID intake. Co-morbid conditions associated were noted. RESULTS: Of 2 260 patients, 10% (217/2 260) had duodenal ulcer. Duodenal ulcer related to H pylori infection accounted for 53% (116/217), NSAID-related 10% (22/217), non-H pylori non-NSAID 29% (62/217), and 8% (17/217) had both H pylori infection and histories of NSAID intake. Fifteen percent (18/116)_patients had past histories of peptic ulcer disease in H pylori infection, while 8% (5/62) in non-H pylori non-NSAID ulcer. Co-morbid conditions in H pylori infection were seen in 23% (27/116) and 34% (21/62) in non-H pylori non-NSAID ulcer. CONCLUSION: Incidence of H pylori infection related with duodenai ulcer is common. In the presence of co-morbids, non-H pylori and non-NSAID duodenal ulcer is likely to be present.     

Helicobacter pylori status and endoscopy follow-up of patients having a history of perforated duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the recurrence of symptoms or ulcer disease in patients with a history of perforated duodenal ulcer is related to Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred sixty-three consecutive patients with history of perforated duodenal ulcer unrelated to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs underwent upper endoscopy. Any recurrent symptoms or complications were documented. Regardless of the endoscopic findings, three antral biopsy specimens were taken for histologic examination and a rapid urease test. RESULTS: There was a preponderance of men (male/female = 5.3:1). The mean age was 55.9 years. Sixty-seven (41.1%) patients gave a history of recurrent epigastric pain, seven of whom also had a history of bleeding ulcer. Upper endoscopy was performed at a mean of 74.5 +/- 7.1 months after operation. Positive endoscopic findings were noted in 68 (41.7%) patients; H. pylori was found in the biopsy specimens from 77 (47.2%) patients. Recurrent duodenal ulcer was found in 29 (17.8%) patients and was significantly related to male gender, recurrent epigastric pain, bleeding ulcer, longer interval from previous operation, and positive H. pylori status. Positive H. pylori status and male gender were independent factors associated with recurrent duodenal ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent ulcer disease in patients with a history of perforated duodenal ulcer is related to H. pylori infection.     

A 1 year follow-up study of the consequences of Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients: unchanged frequency of erosive oesophagitis and decreased prevalence of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Discussions concerning the increased incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) after Helicobacter pylori eradication continue. In this study we aimed to evaluate the presence of co-existing GORD in (1) duodenal ulcer patients after successful H. pylori eradication, (2) patients with persistent H. pylori infection after attempts at eradication, and (3) controls in whom H. pylori eradication had not been attempted. METHODS: A prospective study of 255 patients with duodenal ulcer who were assigned to H. pylori eradication or to control treatment (omeprazole for 4 weeks) and followed up for 1 year or until peptic ulcer relapse. GORD was determined in the patients who had reflux oesophagitis on endoscopy at the beginning of the study and/or in patients without reflux oesophagitis if they experienced heartburn and/or regurgitation at least twice a week associated with impairment of daily activities. RESULTS: The study revealed a significant decrease (from 44.6% to 21.7%; P < 0.001) of patients with GORD at the end of the follow-up among those in whom H. pylori eradication had been successful. There was no significant difference in the frequency of reflux oesophagitis before and after the follow-up regardless of H. pylori status. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication did not significantly influence the prevalence and incidence of reflux oesophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer during a 1 year follow-up period, but there was a significantly lower prevalence of GORD after successful H. pylori eradication, as patients with non-erosive GORD had been cured.     

Effect of treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection on the long-term recurrence of gastric or duodenal ulcer. A randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of treating Helicobacter pylori infection on the recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease. DESIGN: Follow-up of up to 2 years in patients with healed ulcers who had participated in randomized, controlled trials. SETTING: A Veterans Affairs hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 109 patients infected with H. pylori who had a recently healed duodenal (83 patients) or gastric ulcer (26 patients) as confirmed by endoscopy. INTERVENTION: Patients received ranitidine, 300 mg, or ranitidine plus triple therapy. Triple therapy consisted of tetracycline, 2 g; metronidazole, 750 mg; and bismuth subsalicylate, 5 or 8 tablets (151 mg bismuth per tablet) and was administered for the first 2 weeks of treatment; ranitidine therapy was continued until the ulcer had healed or 16 weeks had elapsed. After ulcer healing, no maintenance antiulcer therapy was given. MEASUREMENTS: Endoscopy to assess ulcer recurrence was done at 3-month intervals or when a patient developed symptoms, for a maximum of 2 years. RESULTS: The probability of recurrence for patients who received triple therapy plus ranitidine was significantly lower than that for patients who received ranitidine alone: for patients with duodenal ulcer, 12% (95% CI, 1% to 24%) compared with 95% (CI, 84% to 100%); for patients with gastric ulcer, 13% (CI, 4% to 31%) compared with 74% (44% to 100%). Fifty percent of patients who received ranitidine alone for healing of duodenal or gastric ulcer had a relapse within 12 weeks of healing. Ulcer recurrence in the triple therapy group was related to the failure to eradicate H. pylori and to the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication of H. pylori infection markedly changes the natural history of peptic ulcer in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer. Most peptic ulcers associated with H. pylori infection are curable.     

Attributable Risk of H. pylori in Peptic Ulcer Disease

Recent reports in the United States have found that fewer peptic ulcers are due to Helicobacter pylori than previously believed. The aim of this study is to determine if the declining prevalence of H. pylori infection in the general population can account for the apparent increase in the frequency of non-H. pylori ulcers. A total of 396 patients with peptic ulcer or ulcer scar were enrolled in this study. The pre-1950 population consisted of 149 patients with gastric ulcers and with 44 duodenal ulcers. The post-1950 population consisted of 96 patients with gastric ulcers and 107 with duodenal ulcers. The frequency of H. pylori-negative gastric ulcers was 5.4% in patients born before 1950 and 4.2% in patients born after 1950, and the frequency of H. pylori-negative duodenal ulcers was 0% and 1.9%, respectively. There are no statistical differences between the two populations in gastric and duodenal ulcers. H. pylori seropositivity was 74.9% in asymptomatic volunteers born before 1950 and 20.7% in those born after 1950 (P < 0.01) in the general population. The attributable risk of H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer diseases was not affected by the prevalence of H. pylori infection in the general population in Japan. This suggests that the apparent increase in frequency of non-H. pylori ulcers in the United States is not simply due to the declining prevalence of infection. Other explanations for non-H. pylori ulcers should be sought.     

The influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastrin and somatostatin values present in serum

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies on the role of Helicobacter pylori in pathogenesis of duodenal ulcers have focused on the mechanism by which H. pylori infections causes exaggerated gastrin release. METHODOLOGY: We compared the gastrin and somatostatin serum values between two groups of patients; 37 H. pylori-positive ones and 29 H. pylori-negative ones. We applied radioimmunoassay technique to determine the gastrin and somatostatin values in serum. H. pylori was confirmed by urease test and by histopathological color according to Giemsa. RESULTS: The level of gastrin in the serum of Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with chronic gastritis were significantly higher in relation to H. pylori-negative patients. The somatostatin concentration in the sera of H. pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcer (16.27 +/- 9.49 pg/mL) were less in comparison with those without duodenal ulcer (23.25 +/- 13.59 pg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that H. pylori infection suppresses the somatostatin secretion.     

The association of Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) affects 10% of the world population. Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) are the principal factors associated with PUD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a cohort of patients with PUD and determine the association between H pylori infection and NSAID use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical charts of patients with endoscopic diagnosis of PUD were retrospectively reviewed from September 2002 to August 2003. Patients were divided into three groups according to ulcer etiology: H pylori infection (group 1); NSAID use (group 2); and combined H pylori infection and NSAID use (group 3). RESULTS: One hundred two patients were evaluated: 36 men (35.3%) and 66 women (64.7%). Forty patients had H pylori infection, 43 had used NSAIDs and 15 had combined H pylori infection and NSAID use; four patients with ulcers secondary to malignancy were excluded. The frequency of women was significantly higher in group 2 (P=0.01). The mean age of patients in group 1 was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P=0.003). PUD developed earlier in group 3 than in group 2 (5.0+/-4.7 months versus 1.4+/-2.1 months, respectively, P=0.018). Thirty-two patients (32.7%) had bleeding peptic ulcer. Group 2 had a higher risk of bleeding peptic ulcer than the other two groups (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The development of PUD was observed earlier in the combined H pylori and NSAID group than in patients with only NSAID use. This suggests a synergic effect between the two risks factors in the development of PUD.