Risk of lung cancer from environmental exposures to tobacco smoke

Epidemiologic evidence on the relation between environmental tobacco smoke and cancer is reviewed. The labeling of tobacco smoke as an environmental cause of lung cancer has been challenged based on allegations of bias in the epidemiologic data. However, tobacco smoke has been shown to increase the risk of lung cancer down to the lowest exposure levels. Environmental tobacco smoke contains the same carcinogenic compounds as those found in the tobacco smoke inhaled directly by the smoker. Nonsmokers environmentally exposed have elevated levels of tobacco smoke byproducts in biological samples. These observations alone are sufficient to identify tobacco smoke as an environmental carcinogen. The epidemiologic studies showing that environmental exposure to tobacco smoke is associated weakly but consistently with increased risk of lung cancer. While these epidemiologic studies have been challenged, it does not appear that the observed epidemiologic associations are due to misclassification or confounding. Indeed, the epidemiologic results, particularly among the studies with superior data collection methods and better control of bias and confounding, find consistent associations between environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer. This paper summarizes the evidence that environmental exposure to tobacco smoke increases the risk of lung cancer, and considers the criticisms of the epidemiologic evidence which have been raised.     

Factors modifying exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in children (Athens, Greece)

The aim of the study was to investigate individual, family, and environmental factors which may modify exposure of children to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). A total of 2,108 children of both genders, aged up to 14 years old, were enrolled in the study. Parents of the children provided information concerning several factors that may affect exposure to ETS. Cotinine-to-creatinine ratios in spot urine samples were measured for each child. These values were logtransformed and regressed on a series of exposure variables. Among children, 73 percent were exposed to ETS generated by at least one smoker in the household. Exposure to ETS was affected by the following factors: cigarettes smoked by parents while the child was at home (increase by 37 percent per 10 cigarettes daily, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=32-43 percent); precautions taken by parents (no cf yes, increase by 38 percent, CI=24-54 percent); child's age (decrease by nine percent per year, CI=-11--8 percent); gender (male lower than female by 13 percent, CI=-21--3 percent); day of the week (Monday cf Tuesday-through-Sunday, increase by 28 percent, CI=14-44 percent); floor surface area (decrease by nine percent per 20m2, CI=-14--5 percent); heating (central cf non-central decrease by 14 percent, CI=-25--2 percent); maternal education (decrease by nine percent per five years, CI=-18-0 percent); paternal education (decrease by seven percent per five years, CI=-15-2 percent). It is concluded that several household-related factors affect exposure to ETS and that this exposure can be reduced by about one-third by simple precautions taken by smoking parents.     

A European validation study of smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure in nonsmoking lung cancer cases and controls

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate, in a case-control study, the reporting by lung cancer cases and controls of their own lifetime smoking habits and of the smoking habit of the spouse. Methods: In a multicenter (Sweden, Spain, Italy) case-control study of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and lung cancer, subjects were screened by repeated probing to exclude regular smokers of one cigarette/day or more for one year or more, and to quantify any occasional smoking. We then performed a short validation interview with next-of-kin in three centers. Results: Only five of 408 index subjects who had never smoked regularly (1.7 percent) were reported by next-of-kin to be former regular smokers. These subjects had a cumulative lifetime consumption of cigarettes below 1.1 pack years. Among 351 subjects with quantitative smoking information from both sources who reported ever smoking 400 cigarettes or less (the definition of never-smoker used in the multicenter ETS study), nine subjects (2.6 percent) had smoked more than this amount occasionally according to next-of-kin. Misclassification was not higher for cases than controls. Relative risks for lung cancer associated with indicators of ETS exposure were not substantially altered by excluding the nine possibly misclassified subjects. The reports from 223 pairs of index subjects and next-of kin regarding the cumulative amount smoked by the spouse agreed quite well (Spearman's rank correlation 0.75 for reported smokers, 0.92 for all subjects). Only one index subject failed to report a spouse who had smoked regularly (99 percent sensitivity). Conclusions: Smoking status and exposure to spousal ETS as reported by lung cancer cases and controls agreed strongly with reports by next-of-kin. Overall, our results suggest that bias from smoker misclassification is likely to be insignificant, and they contribute to the evidence linking exposure to ETS with an increased risk of lung cancer.     

A prospective study on active and environmental tobacco smoking and bladder cancer risk (The Netherlands)

Objective: In a prospective cohort study among 120,852 adult subjects the authors investigated the associations between cigarette, cigar, pipe, environmental tobacco smoking (ETS), and bladder cancer. Methods: In 1986 all subjects completed a questionnaire on cancer risk factors. Follow-up for incident bladder cancer was established by linkage to cancer registries until 1992. The case–cohort analysis was based on 619 cases and 3346 subcohort members. Results: Compared with lifelong non-smokers the age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios (RR) for ex- and current cigarette smokers were 2.1 (95% CI 1.5–3.0) and 3.3 (95% CI 2.4–4.6), respectively. The RR for smoking duration was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02–1.04) per 1-year increment. The RR per 10 cigarettes/day was 1.3 (95% CI 1.2–1.4). Tar and nicotine exposure increased bladder cancer risk only weakly. It appeared that associations of cigarette smoking characteristics with bladder cancer risk were largely attributable to cigarette smoking duration only. Smoking cessation, age at first exposure, filter-tip usage, cigar and pipe smoking, and ETS were no longer associated with bladder cancer risk after adjustment for frequency and duration of smoking. Conclusions: The authors conclude that current cigarette smokers have a three-fold higher bladder cancer risk than non-smokers. Ex-smokers experience a two-fold increased risk. About half of male bladder cancer and one-fifth of female bladder cancer was attributable to cigarette smoking. Other smoking types (cigar, pipe, or ETS) were not associated with increased risks.     

Dietary patterns of female nonsmokers with and without exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

The relationship of passive smoking to diet was examined in 82 female nonsmokers who provided a quantitative diet history in 1986. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) was assessed by urinary cotinine measurement. Mean values for each dietary variable, adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and last week's ethanol intake, were compared among unexposed women and women with low or high ETS exposure. Linear relationships with amount of ETS exposure were also sought. Intakes of beta-carotene and cholesterol were found to be inversely related to ETS exposure. Since these nutrients have been associated with lung cancer risk, they are potential confounders of the passive-smoking/lung-cancer relationship. Although we estimate the confounding effect of these dietary factors to be modest, they should be measured carefully in future studies of this relationship.This work was supported in part by Public Health Service grant CA-33619 from the National Cancer Institute, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.     

Clinico-pathological features and survival of lung cancer patients in Paris, France

We studied the clinico-pathological features of 750 lung cancers identified in Paris, France, during 1988. An internal comparison was performed between adenocarcinomas and other subtypes. Survival of 502 patients was studied. 85% of patients were males; 93% were smokers or ex-smokers. Squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, small cell carcinomas and large cell cancers accounted for 51, 22, 15 and 12% of all cases, respectively. Differences were found for the distribution of histological subtyping according to sex (P = 0.001) and smoking status (P = 0.0001) with a greater proportion of adenocarcinomas for women and non-smokers. Median overall survival was less than one year. In multiple regression analysis, small cell lung cancer patients appeared to have a worse prognosis than other histological subtypes. This study describes patients who were treated in community practice and might be more representative of the real clinico-pathological profile of this disease in France.     

Risk modification by CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms in the association of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a case-control study in Japanese nonsmoking women

Genetic backgrounds may modify the association of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) with lung cancer risk. Polymorphisms of both the activating and detoxifying enzymes, cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) and glutathione-S-transferase M1 (GSTM1), may be important as genetic factors. We conducted a multicenter case-control study in Japanese nonsmoking women. Cases were women aged 30-89 years and newly diagnosed as having lung cancer from November 1997 to March 2001 in 4 study areas. We also recruited age-matched (5-year strata) and hospital-matched nonsmoking controls. A total of 158 cases and 259 hospital controls supplied blood for genotyping. Detailed information on ETS exposure from husbands and that in other situations and on potential confounders was collected by interview. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by using conditional logistic models. We found no increase in the risk of lung cancer for CYP1A1 Msp I genotypes. For the GSTM1 null genotype vs. nonnull genotype, the OR was 1.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-2.09], which indicated a somewhat increased risk for the GSTM1 null genotype. A gene-environment interaction was suggested, with combined GSTM1 null genotype and high-dose ETS exposure (>/=40 pack-years by husbands) conferring significantly higher risk (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.13-4.57) compared to the GSTM1 nonnull genotype and low-dose ETS exposure (<40 pack-years). Our results do not support a major role of Msp I polymorphism of the CYP1A1 gene as a risk factor for lung cancer among nonsmoking women. In contrast, the GSTM1 null genotype posed an increased, although not significant, risk among them. Additional studies are warranted to confirm the ETS-GSTM1 polymorphism interaction suggested in our present study.     

Cancer in the offspring of parents with lung cancer

Despite several studies on the role of passive smoking in the development of childhood cancer, particularly leukaemia, lymphomas and brain cancer, no definitive answer has yet been provided. The aim of the cohort study reported here was to analyse the incidence of cancer in the offspring of young lung cancer patients on the basis of the assumption that all of the offspring were exposed passively to smoke. The files of the Danish Cancer Registry provided 3348 cases of lung cancer patients born after 1935, and their offspring (n = 6417) were identified through the Danish Population Register. The files of the offspring were then linked with the files of the Danish Cancer Registry and the numbers of cancers observed in the offspring were compared with those expected from national age-specific and calender-time-specific rates. A total of 135 333 person-years was the basis for analysis. Twenty-six cancers were observed, with 30.3 expected, yielding a standardised incidence ratio (SIR) of 0.9 (90% confidence interval (CI), 0.6–1.2). There was no excess of brain tumours, leukaemias or lymphomas. Stratification for sex of the lung cancer patients revealed a non-significantly increased risk for both non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (three cases; SIR = 3.4; 90% CI: 0.9–8.7) and Hodgkin’s disease (three cases; SIR = 2.6; 90% CI: 0.7–6.6) in the offspring of female lung cancer patients. These results suggest that there is little evidence of an excess cancer risk in childhood, whether due to passive smoking or to as yet unidentified genetic factors, among the offspring of people who develop lung cancer. However, the results are limited by the fact that exposure was only assessed indirectly, with no measurement of actual cigarette consumption made.     

Environmental tobacco smoke, genetic susceptibility, and risk of lung cancer in never-smoking women

BACKGROUND: Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is considered to be a major lung cancer risk factor for never smokers. We investigated the hypothesis that never-smoking women who are exposed to ETS and develop lung cancer are a genetically susceptible population. METHODS: Archival tumor tissues were analyzed from 106 never-smoking women enrolled in a case-control study of ETS (and other personal and environmental factors) and lung cancer risk. We analyzed germline polymorphisms in genes that have been associated with cancer susceptibility and whose products activate (cytochrome P450 1A1 [CYP1A1]) and detoxify (glutathione S-transferases M1 [GSTM1] and T1 [GSTT1]) chemical carcinogens found in tobacco smoke. RESULTS: When compared with never smokers who had no ETS exposure and developed lung cancer (n = 55), never smokers with exposure to ETS who developed lung cancer (n = 51) were more likely to be deficient in GSTM1 activity (i.e., were GSTM1 null) because of a genetic polymorphism in the GSTM1 gene (odds ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-6.1). A statistically significant rising trend in risk occurred with increasing ETS exposure (two-sided P =. 02), reaching a more than sixfold excess risk in those exposed to 55 pack-years of ETS (ETS pack-year = ETS produced by an active smoker, within a confined space such as a room, who smokes one pack of cigarettes a day for a year). No evidence was found of associations between GSTT1 deficiency or the CYP1A1 valine variant and lung cancer risk due to ETS exposure. CONCLUSIONS: A common genetic polymorphism divides the population of never smokers into two groups of approximately equal size, one (homozygous carriers of the GSTM1 null allele) that has a statistically significant greater risk of lung cancer from ETS than the other (heterozygous or homozygous carriers of the wild-type GSTM1 allele).     

Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer mortality in the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study II

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has been classified as a human lung carcinogen by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), based both on the chemical similarity of sidestream and mainstream smoke and on slightly higher lung cancer risk in never-smokers whose spouses smoke compared with those married to nonsmokers. We evaluated the relation between ETS and lung cancer prospectively in the US, among 114,286 female and 19,549 male never-smokers, married to smokers, compared with about 77,000 female and 77,000 male never-smokers whose spouses did not smoke. Multivariate analyses, based on 247 lung cancer deaths, controlled for age, race, diet, and occupation. Dose-response analyses were restricted to 92,222 women whose husbands provided complete information on cigarette smoking and date of marriage. Lung cancer death rates, adjusted for other factors, were 20 percent higher among women whose husbands ever smoked during the current marriage than among those married to never-smokers (relative risk [RR]=1.2, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.8-1.6). For never-smoking men whose wives smoked, the RR was 1.1 (CI=0.6-1.8). Risk among women was similar or higher when the husband continued to smoke (RR=1.2, CI=0.8-1.8), or smoked 40 or more cigarettes per day (RR=1.9, CI=1.0-3.6), but did not increase with years of marriage to a smoker. Most CIs included the null. Although generally not statistically significant, these results agree with the EPA summary estimate that spousal smoking increases lung cancer risk by about 20 percent in never-smoking women. Even large prospective studies have limited statistical power to measure precisely the risk from ETS.     

Interaction between environmental tobacco smoke and arsenic methylation ability on the risk of bladder cancer

Objective: Arsenic exposure and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) have been suspected to be associated with bladder cancer risk. We hypothesize that interaction between ETS and the ability to methylate arsenic, a detoxification pathway, modifies the risk of bladder cancer.Methods: From January 1996 to December 1999, we identified 41 newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients and 202 fracture and cataract patients at the National Cheng-Kung University (NCKU) Medical Center. The levels of urinary arsenic species [As(III), As(V), MMA(V), and DMA(V)] were determined in all subjects.Results: We found significant interaction between ETS and secondary methylation index (SMI) on the risk of bladder cancer (p=0.02). Among non-smokers with a high primary methylation index (PMI), the risk of bladder cancer was lower in subjects exposed to ETS (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14–0.96) than in subjects without exposure to ETS. Among non-smokers without ETS, the risk of bladder cancer was 4.7 times higher in subjects with a low SMI (95% CI, 1.30–16.81) than in subjects with a high SMI.Conclusions: Ability to methylate arsenic plays an important role in reducing the risk of bladder cancer attributable to the continuation of arsenic exposure from drinking water and from ETS exposure.     

吸烟和环境烟草烟雾暴露与膀胱癌关系的病例对照研究

目的研究分析吸烟及环境烟草烟雾暴露与膀胱癌的关系。方法自1996年1月~1999年6月,上海市区开展了一项大规模的基于全人群的膀胱癌病例对照研究,共访问到608例膀胱癌病例和607例健康人群对照。使用非条件logistic回归分析,调整可能的混杂因素,估计吸烟及环境烟草烟雾暴露对膀胱癌发生的比数比和95%可信区间。结果男性吸烟者患膀胱癌的危险性是不吸烟者的1.67倍(95%CI1.23~2.27),且随着每天吸烟量、累积吸烟量、吸烟年限和吸烟深度的增加而增加,吸烟开始年龄越小危险性越大;戒烟后膀胱癌危险性有所降低。吸烟也显著增加女性膀胱癌的危险性,调整OR为4.19(95%CI1.65~10.65)。吸烟者的调整人群归因危险度男性、女性分别为32.04%和15.61%。未发现环境烟草暴露增加非吸烟者膀胱癌的危险性。结论进一步证实吸烟是膀胱癌发生的重要危险因素。环境烟草烟雾暴露是否增加膀胱癌危险性尚难定论。     

Risk factors for lung cancer among nonsmoking women

To evaluate risk factors for lung cancer in nonsmoking women, we used data of a case-control study conducted between 1991 and 1996 in Germany. A total of 234 female histologically confirmed lung cancer patients and 535 population controls who had never smoked more than 400 cigarettes in their lifetime were personally interviewed with respect to occupation, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), family history of cancer, prior physician-diagnosed lung diseases or cancer and diet. One-year radon measurements in the last dwelling were performed. Odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age and region and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated via logistic regression. When cumulative duration of exposure to ETS in hours was considered, the OR for high compared to not or low ETS exposed women was 2.62 (CI:1.35-5.06) for occupational exposure and OR=1.67 (CI:0.86-3.25) for spousal exposure, exhibiting a significant trend for ETS at work. Working more than 10 years in jobs or industries with known or suspected lung carcinogens was associated with OR=2.0 (CI:0.99-4.0). An elevated risk due to prior lung diseases was present for pneumonia (OR=1.6; CI:1.07-2.40) and tuberculosis (OR=1.6; CI:0.77-3.37). No significant increase in risk with increasing residential radon levels or with the presence of a family history of lung cancer was apparent. Protective effects were observed for high vs. low consumption of fresh vegetables (OR=0.5; CI:0.25-0.82) and cheese (OR=0.3, CI:0.21-0.55). ETS at work, occupational hazards and previous pneumonia may be risk factors for lung cancer in nonsmoking women, while a diet rich in fresh vegetables and cheese seems to be protective.     

Association between self-reported environmental tobacco smoke exposure and lung cancer: modification by GSTP1 polymorphism

Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) exposure has been associated with lung cancer risk. ETS is composed of emissions from cigarette smoke and contains a higher concentration of tobacco smoke carcinogens than mainstream smoke. Polymorphisms in genes that metabolize tobacco smoke carcinogens have been studied as effect modifiers of the association between active smoking and lung cancer risk. GSTP1 is a polymorphic gene that encodes for GST pi, a detoxification enzyme and has a high expression in the lung. We investigated the association between ETS and lung cancer risk and the modification of this association by the GSTP1 polymorphism. Using a case-control design, individuals were genotyped for GSTP1 using PCR-RFLP techniques. All analyses were carried out using multiple logistic regression. The association between ETS exposure and lung cancer risk was evaluated in different strata based on smoking habits to evaluate the consistency of results. The effect of the GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk was evaluated by considering the joint effect of having both an ETS exposure and the GSTP1 GG genotype compared to the absence of ETS exposure and the GSTP1 AA genotype as a reference group as well as doing stratified analysis by genotype. ETS exposure was associated consistently with higher lung cancer risk in all the strata considered. The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) evaluating the association between ETS and lung cancer risk for the different strata were: nonsmokers (Cases/Controls 66/413; AOR = 1.38; 95% CI = 0.78-2.43), ex-smokers (Cases/Controls 560/527; AOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.22-2.25), current smokers (Cases/Controls 415/219; AOR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.00-2.41). The AORs for ex-smokers and light smoking subgroups were: ex-smokers who quit for 19 years or more (Cases/Controls 144/244; AOR = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.55-4.50), ex-smokers who quit for 10-19 years (Cases/Controls 141/128; AOR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.66-2.04), ex-smokers who quit for 10 years or less (Cases/Controls 247/122; AOR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.83-2.55) and participants who had <15 packyears and nonsmokers combined (Cases/Controls 143/640; AOR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.02-2.28). Among those with the GSTP1 GG genotype the ETS-lung cancer risk association was greater than those with the GSTP1 AA genotype: nonsmokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 7.84; 95% CI = 0.80-76.68; GSTP1 AA AOR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.46-2.90), ex-smokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 2.32; 95% CI = 0.90-5.96; GSTP1 AA AOR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.34-3.44), current smokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 1.75; 95% CI = 0.42-7.32; GSTP1 AA AOR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.67-2.58) and participants who had <15 packyears and nonsmokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 1.93; 95% CI = 0.54-6.97; GSTP1 AA AOR = 1.58; 95% CI = 0.83-3.01). We found that ETS exposure is associated with higher lung cancer risk. Furthermore, the presence of the GSTP1 GG genotype appears to enhance the magnitude of the association between ETS exposure and lung cancer. Larger studies will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings.     

Radon, secondhand smoke, glutathione-S-transferase M1 and lung cancer among women

Tobacco smoke and ionizing radiation induce oxidative stress by transmitting or generating reactive oxygen species (ROS). We hypothesized that glutathione-S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) null homozygotes would have decreased ability to neutralize ROS that might increase their susceptibility to lung cancer. A case-only design was used with lung cancer cases pooled from 3 previously completed case-control studies using archival tissue samples from 270 lung cancer cases to genotype GSTM1. Radon concentrations were measured with long-term alpha-track radon detectors. Secondhand smoke (SHS) was measured with questionnaires and interviews. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate the interaction odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Radon concentrations >121 Bq m(-3) were associated with a >3-fold interaction OR (OR = 3.41; 95% CI = 1.10, 10.61) for GSTM1 null homozygotes compared to GSTM1 carriers; the linear trend was significant (p trend = 0.03). The SHS and GSTM1 interaction OR was also elevated (OR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.15-4.51) among never-smokers. This may be the first study to provide evidence of a GSTM1 and radon interaction in risk of lung cancer. Additionally, these findings support the hypothesis that radon and SHS promote neoplasia through shared elements of a common pathway.     

DNA and protein adducts in human tissues resulting from exposure to tobacco smoke

Tobacco smoke contains a variety of genotoxic carcinogens that form adducts with DNA and protein in the tissues of smokers. Not only are these biochemical events relevant to the carcinogenic process, but the detection of adducts provides a means of monitoring exposure to tobacco smoke. Characterization of smoking-related adducts has shed light on the mechanisms of smoking-related diseases and many different types of smoking-derived DNA and protein adducts have been identified. Such approaches also reveal the potential harm of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to nonsmokers, infants and children. Because the majority of tobacco-smoke carcinogens are not exclusive to this source of exposure, studies comparing smokers and nonsmokers may be confounded by other environmental sources. Nevertheless, certain DNA and protein adducts have been validated as biomarkers of exposure to tobacco smoke, with continuing applications in the study of ETS exposures, cancer prevention and tobacco product legislation. Our article is a review of the literature on smoking-related adducts in human tissues published since 2002.     

Never smokers and lung cancer risk: a case-control study of epidemiological factors

We performed an analysis of potential epidemiological risk factors for lung cancer using data from 280 cases and 242 hospital-based controls, all lifetime never smokers (those who had smoked <100 cigarettes in their lifetimes) and frequency matched on age, gender and ethnicity. The data on demographic characteristics, medical history of respiratory diseases (asthma, emphysema, pneumonia and hay fever), weight and height, family history, female characteristics and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and dust exposure were derived from personal interviews. We performed a logistic regression analysis of these variables adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, income and years of education. Exposure to ETS (OR = 2.08, 95% CI [1.25-3.43]) and dusts (OR = 2.43, 95% CI [1.53-3.88]) were associated with significantly increased risk. In the analysis for joint effects, exposure to both ETS and dusts conferred a higher risk (OR = 3.25, 95% CI [1.58-6.70]) than exposure to either alone. Family history of any cancer with onset before age 50 in at least 1 first degree relative was a significant risk predictor (OR = 1.70, 95% CI [1.10-2.64]). Individuals with a self-reported physician-diagnosed history of hay fever, but not asthma, had a decreased lung cancer risk (OR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.35-0.92]). In the multivariate analysis, exposure to ETS and dusts, and family history of cancer with onset before age 50 were significant risk factors, while a history of hay fever (occurring without asthma) was significantly protective.     

Secondhand smoke concentrations in hospitality venues in the Pacific Basin: findings from American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam

Introduction: Secondhand smoke (SHS) from burning tobacco products causes disease and premature death among nonsmokers. Although the number of laws prohibiting smoking in indoor public places continues to increase, millions of nonsmokers in the United States (US) and its territories remain exposed to SHS. This study assessed indoor air pollution from SHS in hospitality venues in three US Pacific Basin territories. Methods: Air monitors were used to assess PM2.5, an environmental marker for SHS, in 19 smoke-permitted and 18 smoke-free bars and restaurants in American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), and Guam. Observational logs were used to record smoking and other sources of air pollution. Differences in average PM2.5 concentrations were determined using bivariate statistics. Results: The average PM2.5 level in venues where smoking was always permitted [arithmetic mean (AM)=299.98 μg/m3; geometric mean (GM)=200.39 μg/m3] was significantly higher (p<0.001) than smoke-free venues [AM=8.33 μg/m3; GM=6.14 μg/m3]. In venues where smoking was allowed only during certain times, the average level outside these times [AM=42.10 μg/m3; GM=41.87 μg/m3] was also significantly higher (p<0.001) than smoke-free venues. Conclusions: Employees and patrons of smoke-permitted bars and restaurants are exposed to dangerous levels of air pollution from SHS, even during periods when active smoking is not occurring. Prohibiting smoking in all public indoor areas, irrespective of the venue type or time of day, is the only way to fully protect nonsmokers from SHS exposure in these environments.