Prognostic Factors and Optimal Treatment Strategy for Intrahepatic Nodular Recurrence After Curative Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background Intrahepatic recurrence is a major problem after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the most effective treatments for patients with intrahepatic recurrence still remain unclear. In addition, the selection of various treatment modalities such as repeat resection, local ablation therapy, and transarterial chemoembolization is only applicable to patients with intrahepatic nodular recurrence. Methods Of 353 patients who underwent curative resection, 97 patients with intrahepatic nodular recurrence were retrospectively studied. The prognostic factors for survival after recurrence and treatment modalities were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups, a control group and a progression group, according to their response to initial treatment for recurrent tumors. Results The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates after recurrence in patients with intrahepatic nodular recurrence were 91.0%, 71.0%, and 37.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that early recurrence (≤12 months), Child-Pugh class B or C at diagnosis of recurrence, and serum albumin level of ≤3.5 g/dL at diagnosis of recurrence were poor prognostic factors for survival after recurrence. With regard to the response to the initial treatment, time to recurrence of ≤12 months was found to be the only statistically significant risk factor for progression of disease in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Time to recurrence, which usually corresponds with the cellular origin of recurrence, seems to be more important when determining the prognosis of patients with recurrent disease and treatment response than treatment modality. Therefore, different treatment methods should be selected according to the time to recurrence of intrahepatic nodular recurrence.     

Complete Necrosis After Transarterial Chemoembolization Could Predict Prolonged Survival in Patients with Recurrent Intrahepatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection

Background

We explored the predictors of response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with recurrent intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy and investigated the survival of these patients according to the response to TACE.

Methods

We analyzed data from 199 consecutive HCC patients who underwent curative liver resection and who later received repeat TACE for intrahepatic HCC recurrence.

Results

Of 199 patients, 139 (69.8%) achieved complete necrosis (CN) of HCC after repeated TACE (mean TACE session number, 1.3) and the other 60 (30.2%) (non-CN group) did not achieve CN. At hepatectomy, the CN group showed significantly smaller proportions of tumor capsular invasion, microvascular invasion, and pathologic tumor–node–metastasis stage III or IV HCCs. At first TACE, the CN group showed a significantly greater proportion of patients with time to recurrence ≥ 1 year, Child–Pugh class A, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels < 200 ng/mL, tumor size < 3 cm, solitary tumors, and nodular tumor types; portal vein invasion were less common than seen in the non-CN group. After multivariate analysis, tumor size < 3 cm and a single tumor at first TACE were independently related to attainment of CN after TACE. Median survival after first TACE was significantly longer in the CN group (48.9 versus 17.0 months). In a Cox regression model, CN after TACE was an independent predictor of favorable survival outcome after first TACE.

Conclusions

CN after repeat TACE for postresection intrahepatic recurrence was attained more commonly in patients with smaller tumor size and lower tumor number at first TACE and favored longer survival in recurrent patients.     

293例原发性肝癌术后复发的综合治疗效果分析

目的评估以手术切除、局部消融(ablation)和经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术(transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,TACE)为主的综合治疗对原发性肝癌手术后复发的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性分析华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院2010年1月至2012年12月确诊原发性肝癌复发病人293例的临床资料,其中手术再切除33例,TACE联合消融治疗89例,TACE118例,保守治疗53例。结果肝切除术后无严重并发症,均顺利出院;2例病人TACE术后发生肝功能不全,予以护肝治疗后肝功能恢复正常;1例病人经皮微波固化术后发生食管穿孔,经开胸食管修补术后治疗后痊愈。1、3、5年生存率手术组分别为72.72%、45.45%和32.14%,中位生存期为30个月;TACE联合局部消融组:62.92%、31.46%和17.14%,中位生存期为21个月;单纯行TACE组:47.46%、29.66%和8.42%,中位生存期为11.5个月;保守治疗组的1、3、5年生存率分别为20.75%、3.77%和0%,中位生存期为7.75个月。结论根据病人病情制定以手术切除联合TACE、局部消融的个体化综合治疗方案是复发性肝癌治疗的理想模式;能行手术切除的病人预后较好;肝癌术后定期复查是早发现、早治疗、提高复发性肝癌手术率的关键措施。     

Intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of treatment and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of treatment and prognostic factors in patients with intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of re-resection, transarterial oily chemoembolization (TOCE), or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) in selected patients with intrahepatic recurrent HCC. The overall results of a treatment strategy combining these modalities have not been fully evaluated, and the prognostic factors determining survival in these patients remain to be clarified. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four patients who underwent curative resection for HCC were followed for intrahepatic recurrence, which was treated aggressively with a strategy including different modalities. Survival results after recurrence and from initial hepatectomy were analyzed, and prognostic factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis using 27 clinicopathologic variables. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients (43%) with intrahepatic recurrence were treated with re-resection (11), TOCE (71), PEIT (6), systemic chemotherapy (8) or conservatively (9). The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates from the time of recurrence were 65.5%, 34.9%, and 19.7%, respectively, and from the time of initial hepatectomy were 78.4%, 47.2%, and 30.9%, respectively. The re-resection group had the best survival, followed by the TOCE group. Multivariate analysis revealed Child's B or C grading, serum albumin < or = 40 g/l, multiple recurrent tumors, recurrence < or = 1 year after hepatectomy, and concurrent extrahepatic recurrence to be independent adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive treatment with a multimodality strategy could result in prolonged survival in patients with intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection for HCC. Prognosis was determined by the liver function status, interval to recurrence, number of recurrent tumors, any concurrent extrahepatic recurrence, and type of treatment.     

Survival Analysis of Re-resection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Intrahepatic Recurrence After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background  

Tumor recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is a common phenomenon. Re-resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are good options for treating recurrent HCC. This study compared the efficacy of these two modalities in the treatment of intrahepatic HCC recurrence after hepatectomy.     

Prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to identify prognostic factors in patients who developed recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after repeat hepatectomy and to elucidate the role of multicentric occurrence in the second tumor after a first hepatectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A repeat hepatectomy for recurrent HCC has been established as the most effective treatment modality, whenever it is possible. However, the prognostic factors for recurrent HCC after repeat hepatectomy have yet to be clarified. METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent a curative repeat hepatectomy were retrospectively studied. Patient survival and disease-free survival after recurrence were univariately and multivariately analyzed using 38 clinicopathologic variables. The histologic grade of HCC at repeat hepatectomy was also compared with that at first hepatectomy. RESULTS: Patient survival after repeat hepatectomy did not differ substantially from that in 312 patients undergoing primary hepatectomy. However, the disease-free survival after repeat hepatectomy was significantly lower than that in patients with only a primary hepatectomy (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed only portal vein invasion in the first hepatectomy to be an independent and significantly poor prognostic factor. Regarding multicentric occurrence at repeat hepatectomy, only 6 of 40 patients (15%) whose specimens could be evaluated histologically were determined to be Edmondson and Steiner's Grade 1. CONCLUSIONS: The only prognostic factor identified in patients with recurrent HCC after repeat hepatectomy was portal vein invasion in the first hepatectomy. Most second tumors after the first hepatectomy are considered to be caused by metastatic recurrence, not by multicentric occurrence.     

Repeat liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Although hepatectomy has been accepted as a therapeutic option for the primary tumor of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), what role the second liver resection will play in the clinical care of patients with intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after the initial resection has not been well evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective review of the 6-year period between January 1991 and December 1996, records were examined of 94 patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC. Of these, 57 patients had isolated recurrent disease to the liver; 12 of the 57 patients underwent repeat surgical resection and 45 patients received nonsurgical ablative therapy. Clinical data for these patients were reviewed for operative morbidity and mortality, survival, disease-free survival, and pattern of failure. RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths during repeat liver resections for recurrent HCC. Operative morbidity in the second resection was comparable to the initial resection. The disease-free survival rate after the second hepatectomy was 31% at 2 years, significantly lower than that after initial hepatectomy (62%) (p = 0.009). The overall survival rate after the second hepatectomy was 90% at 2 years, in contrast to 70% after nonsurgical ablative treatment for recurrent HCC (p = 0.253). CONCLUSIONS: Although the second liver resection for recurrent HCC can be performed safely and may improve survival, the disease-free survival rate after such resection therapy is low. This likelihood of further recurrences encourages studies for the selection of patients who may benefit from repeat liver resection.     

Analysis of Prognostic Factors Affecting Survival After Initial Recurrence and Treatment Efficacy for Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Potentially Curative Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background Survival analysis in patients with initial recurrence after curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well evaluated. In addition, selections of the most effective treatments for patients with recurrent HCC still remain controversial. Methods Three hundred and nineteen patients who underwent potentially curative hepatectomies were followed for initial recurrence, and factors predictive of recurrence were determined. The factors affecting survival including pattern of recurrence and treatment modalities from the time of initial recurrence in 211 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results The overall 5-year disease-free survival rate of 319 patients was 31.1%. The 5-year survival rate of 211 patients from the time of initial recurrence was 31.9%. In a multivariate analysis, a low indocyanine green retention rate, lack of liver cirrhosis, a long interval before recurrence, the absence of portal vein invasion, and intrahepatic recurrence (≤3 nodules) were shown to be significantly favorable prognostic factors after the initial recurrence. The 5-year survival rate of patients with intrahepatic recurrence (≤3 nodules) was 42.3%, and no survival differences were observed among different treatment modalities. Conclusion When the initial recurrence occurred after a longer interval, and/or with three or fewer intrahepatic recurrent nodules, a favorable prognosis could be expected in those patients with better liver function and no portal vein invasion at the time of the primary hepatectomy. It is important to conduct a randomized controlled trial to clarify a method for selecting optimal treatment in patients with a smaller number of initial intrahepatic recurrences.     

Selection criteria for repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in patients with recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to identify selection criteria for repeat resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have demonstrated that repeat hepatectomy is effective for treating intrahepatic recurrent HCC in selected patients. However, the prognostic factors in these patients have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: From October 1994 to December 2000, 334 patients underwent primary resection for HCC, and 67 received a 2nd hepatectomy for recurrent HCC. The survival results in these 67 patients were analyzed, and prognostic factors were determined using 38 clinicopathological variables. The prognosis and operative risk in 11 and 6 patients who received a 3rd and 4th resection were also evaluated. RESULTS: The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 334 patients after primary hepatectomy were 94%, 75%, and 56%, while those of the 67 patients after a 2nd resection were 93%, 70%, and 56%, respectively. There was no difference in survival (P = 0.64). All of the patients who underwent a 3rd or 4th are currently alive at a median follow-up of 2.5 and 1.4 years, respectively. The operative time and blood loss in the 2nd resection in patients who underwent a major primary resection were not different from those in patients who underwent minor hepatectomy at the 1st resection, and there were also no differences in these variables among the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th resections. In a multivariate analysis, absence of portal invasion at the 2nd resection (P = 0.01), single HCC at primary hepatectomy (P = 0.01), and a disease-free interval of 1 year or more after primary hepatectomy (P = 0.02) were independent prognostic factors after the 2nd resection. Twenty-nine patients with all 3 of these factors showed 3- and 5-year survival rates of 100% and 86%, respectively, after the 2nd resection. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for patients who have previously undergone resection of a single HCC at the primary resection and in whom recurrence developed after a disease-free interval of 1 year or more and the recurrent tumor had no portal invasion.     

Surgical treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma based on the mode of recurrence: repeat hepatic resection or ablation are good choices for patients with recurrent multicentric cancer

Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) often recur after curvative resection. Recurrence in the remnant liver originates from intrahepatic metastasis (IM) from the primary resected tumor, and/or from multicentric (MC) occurrence. In order to achieve better survival after intrahepatic recurrence in HCC patients, we have surgically treated patients according to the recurrence pattern. In this study, we investigated the advantage of repeat surgery for MC recurrent HCC. The subjects were 176 patients who had undergone primary macroscopically complete tumor removal for HCC at our department from 1984 to 1999. Differential diagnosis of IM and MC recurrence was done by pathological analysis. Twenty-nine of the 149 patients with recurrence (19.5%) underwent a total of 31 second and third operations. Of the 29 patients, 18 had MC (14 received repeat hepatectomy and 4, microwave tissue coagulation [MTC]), 7 had IM (4 had repeat hepatectomy and 3, MTC), and, in 4 patients, pathological investigation failed to determine the mode of recurrence. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for MC patients after the repeat operations were 100%, 69.7%, and 58.1%, respectively, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for the IM patients were 57.1%, 14.3%, and 14.3%, respectively. Survival after the repeat operation was significantly better in the MC group than in the IM group (P = 0.0016). Moreover, there was no significant difference between survival in the MC group after a repeat operation and survival in control patients after an initial hepatectomy (P = 0.9282). These results indicated that patients with resectable or ablative recurrent MC HCC have almost the same survival benefit after repeat operations as patients who undergo initial curative resection of HCC. Received: February 14, 2001 / Accepted: March 24, 2001     

肝内胆管癌术后复发的治疗

影响肝内胆管癌(intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,ICC)肝切除术后远期生存的主要因素是肝内复发和肝外转移。再切除适用于复发性肿瘤单发、至复发时间较长、肝功能良好的病人,但术后再复发率仍较高。对于术后较早期肝内复发、肿瘤直径不超过3 cm、数目不超过3个的ICC,消融治疗可达到与再切除相似的远期预后。对于不适合再切除或消融的肝内复发ICC,可考虑行经肝动脉栓塞化疗(tansarterial arterial chemoembolization,TACE)或钇-90经肝动脉放射性栓塞。对于术后发生肝外转移的ICC,应联合消融、TACE、系统性化疗、靶向治疗以及姑息治疗等多种治疗手段,以进一步延长病人的生存时间。     

Implication of frequent local ablation therapy for intrahepatic recurrence in prolonged survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatic resection: an analysis of 610 patients over 16 years old

OBJECTIVE: By comparing cohorts in 2 exclusive time frames, the factors that affected the surgical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are presented. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Reportedly, survival results of patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy have improved in recent years. However, the major factors contributing to these favorable outcomes have not been fully explained. METHODS: Between January 1985 and December 2000, 610 patients with HCC underwent liver resections as a primary and curative resection. They were categorized into 2 groups according to the year in which the surgeries were performed: before 1990 (n = 212; early group); and after 1991 (n = 398; late group). Clinicopathologic data, survival data, type of recurrence, and treatment of intrahepatic recurrence were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Clinicopathologic data were almost identical between the groups except for age, blood loss, and duration of surgery. The overall survival rate was significantly better in the late group compared with the early group (58.0% vs. 39.1% at 5 years, P < 0.0001). By contrast, disease-free survival remained unchanged (27.8% vs. 26.2% at 5 years, P = 0.2887). The most common type of recurrence was intrahepatic relapse, and there was no difference in the rate and the type of recurrence between the 2 groups. The 5-year survival rate after recurrence was increased in the late group (21.8% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.0002). Stratified analysis by the type of initial recurrence revealed that better survival in the late group was achieved only in solitary intrahepatic recurrences, not in multiple intrahepatic or extrahepatic recurrences. Changes in modality of treatment of recurrence were observed only in the management of solitary intrahepatic recurrences, where percutaneous ablation therapies were more frequently applied with new ablation techniques. Patients that had undergone ablation therapies in the late group had better postrecurrent survival than those in the early group. Multivariate analysis showed that presence of local ablation therapies was an independent favorable prognostic factor only in the late group. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in outcomes were achieved in patients with HCC who underwent curative liver resections. Percutaneous ablation therapy for intrahepatic recurrence was considered to be a major contributory factor for improving survival after recurrence, as well as for overall survival.     

Repeat hepatectomy is the most useful treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic resection has been regarded as a curative treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but a high incidence of postoperative recurrence is general. Thus it is important to predict the patterns of recurrence and select the appropriate treatment for recurrence for a better long-term prognosis of patients with HCC. Clinicopathological studies on 80 patients with intrahepatic recurrence after curative hepatectomy suggested that nodular-type recurrence with up to three nodules is mainly due to metachronous multicentric hepatocarcinogenesis rather than intrahepatic metastases. We reviewed 300 patients with recurrent HCC, and repeat hepatectomy was done in 78 cases (26.0%). The 3- and 5-year survival rates after repeat hepatectomy were 82.8% and 47.5%, respectively, showing better prognosis than those for other treatments. Repeat hepatectomy is the preferred treatment offering a hope of long-term survival for patients with recurrent HCC as long as liver function is sufficient; thus early detection of recurrence should be ensured. Received: February 14, 2001 / Accepted: March 24, 2001     

Salvage living donor liver transplantation versus repeat liver resection for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis: A propensity score-matched comparison

Following curative liver resection (LR), resectable tumor recurrence in patients with preserved liver function leads to deciding between a repeat LR and a salvage liver transplantation (LT), if a donor’s liver is available. This retrospective study compared survival outcomes and recurrence pattern following salvage living donor LT (LDLT) and repeat LR in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent repeat LR (n = 163) or LDLT (n = 84) for recurrent HCC following curative resections, between January 2005 and December 2017 at a single institution. A 1:1 propensity score matching led to 42 patients per group. Disease-specific and recurrence-free survival were significantly better in the salvage LDLT group than in the repeat LR group (p = .042; HR = 2.40; 95% CI, 0.69–6.00 and p < .001; HR = 4.23; 95% CI, 2.05–8.71, respectively). Despite significant differences in recurrence patterns between the two groups (p = .019), the patient death rates, after recurrence, were similar for both groups (p = .760). This study indicates that salvage LDLT is superior to repeat LR for treating patients with transplantable, intrahepatic HCC recurrence, even in patients with Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis.     

A retrospective study of the preventive effect of transarterial chemotherapy for intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after partial hepatectomy

A major problem in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is intrahepatic recurrence after partial hepatectomy, despite the relatively early detection now possible due to recent developments in non-invasive diagnostic modalities. The present study evaluated the usefulness of preventive therapy for intrahepatic recurrence of HCC. In order to suppress intrahepatic recurrence in HCC patients at high risk of recurrence after tumor removal, we performed preventive transarterial chemotherapy in 23 such patients. Doxorubicin, at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight, was administered, via a catheter inserted at the junction of the common hepatic artery and the gastroduodenal artery, every 2 weeks for the first 2 months, and every month thereafter for at least 1 year. The control group consisted of 30 patients with similar risk of recurrence who underwent partial hepatectomy during the same period without receiving transarterial preventive therapy. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative cancer-free survival rates in patients who received transarterial preventive chemotherapy after partial hepatectomy were 87.0%, 47.1%, 21.2%, and 21.2%, respectively, compared to 53.3%, 30.0%, 20.0%, and 13.3%, respectively, in the control group (P<0.05). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative overall survival rates were 95.7%, 81.2%, 58.4%, and 48.7%, respectively, in the preventive chemotherapy group, compared to 70.0%, 49.4%, 41.7%, and 19.5%, respectively, in the control group (P<0.05). Thus, the present study demonstrates the limited but significant effect of preventive transarterial chemotherapy for the intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after partial hepatectomy. Offprint requests to: S. Arii     

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Background  Whether percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) is as effective as repeat hepatectomy for recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the long-term remains unknown. Methods  We included 110 patients into this study. Each patient had fewer than three recurrent HCCs, with the largest tumor less than 5 cm in diameter. Sixty-six patients with 88 tumors were treated by PRFA and 44 patients with 55 tumors were treated by repeat hepatectomy. Results  The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates after repeat hepatectomy and PRFA were 78.6%, 56.8%, 44.5%, 30.7%, and 27.6%, and 76.6%, 48.6%, 48.6%, 39.9%, and 39.9%, respectively (P = 0.79). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates after the initial hepatectomy for the two groups were 95.4%, 79.1%, 65.0%, 50.4%, and 42.9%, and 98.5%, 85.0%, 70.8%, 58.7%, and 55.6%, respectively, (P = 0.18). Subgroup analyses showed that there was no significant difference between the overall survivals of the two groups of patients when the interval of tumor recurrence from the initial hepatectomy was ≤1 year (P = 0.74) or >1 year (P = 0.69), and for recurrent tumor ≤3 cm (P = 0.62) or >3 cm (P = 0.57). Major complications happened significantly more often after repeat hepatectomy than PRFA (30 of 44 versus 2 of 66, P < 0.05). The interval of recurrence from the initial hepatectomy, the diameter of the recurrent tumor and the serum albumin level were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusion  PRFA was as effective as repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent small HCC. PRFA had the advantage over repeat hepatectomy in being less invasive.     

Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Long-term prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after partial hepatectomy remains unsatisfactory because of the high incidence of recurrence in the liver remnant. Controversy exists about the efficacy of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent HCC patients. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine and clarify the significance of repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent HCC. METHODS: From January 1990 to December 2004, 84 patients with recurrent HCC underwent a second hepatectomy with curative intent. Survival rates in these 84 patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: After the second hepatectomy, the overall 5-year survival rate was 50% for the 84 patients included in this study; the corresponding recurrence-free survival rate was 10%. Multivariate analysis showed that the second hepatectomy performed between 1997 and 2004 (P < .001) and the absence of microscopic vascular invasion at the second hepatectomy (P = .001) were the significant and independent prognostic factors for overall survival after the second hepatectomy. The overall 5-year survival rate after the second hepatectomy was 80% in 46 patients who had both these prognostic factors. However, even in the subgroup with good long-term survival, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was only 6%. The more times hepatectomy was repeated, the shorter the recurrence-free interval became. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent HCC had survival benefits, especially for patients without microscopic vascular invasion. However, the incidence of re-recurrence after the second hepatectomy was high, and the recurrence-free interval was short, even in the subgroup with survival benefits. The effectiveness of repeat hepatectomy for curing recurrent HCC is limited.     

原发性肝细胞癌行肝切除术后复发的预后因素分析

目的探讨HCC行肝切除术后影响患者复发的各预后因素。方法回顾性分析2006年6月～2011年6月行肝切除术治疗HCC的患者临床资料。应用Cox比例风险模型行单因素和多因素分析。结果所有患者均行根治性肝切除术,本组共84例患者出现术后复发,总体1、2、3、5年累积复发率分别为51.96%（53/102）、67.65%（69/102）、76.47%（78/102）、82.35%（84/102）。结论 HCC行肝切除术后复发早、晚期影响因素不同,应进行预后因素等级划分,有助于预测HCC患者术后复发。     

Impact of Spontaneous Hepatocellular Carcinoma Rupture on Recurrence Pattern and Long-term Surgical Outcomes after Partial Hepatectomy

Background

The clinical significance of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rupture association with recurrence pattern and long-term surgical outcomes remains under debate. We investigated the impact of spontaneous HCC rupture on recurrence pattern and long-term surgical outcomes after partial hepatectomy.

Methods

From 2000 to 2012, 119 patients with diagnosed ruptured HCC were reviewed. To compare outcomes between staged hepatectomy in spontaneously ruptured HCC and hepatectomy in non-ruptured HCC, we performed propensity score-matching to adjust for significant differences in patient characteristics. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence pattern were compared between the matched groups.

Results

Forty-four patients with newly diagnosed ruptured HCC and Child A class were initially treated with transcatheter arterial embolization for hemostasis. Three patients underwent emergency laparotomy, 18 underwent staged hepatectomy, and 23 received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone after transcatheter arterial embolization. Among the 23 patients treated with TACE alone, 10 had resectable tumors. The staged hepatectomy group shows significantly higher overall survival with TACE alone than the resectable tumor group (P < 0.001). After propensity score-matching, overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence pattern were not significantly different between the ruptured HCC with staged hepatectomy group and the non-ruptured HCC with hepatectomy group. Peritoneal recurrence rates were similar at 14.3 % versus 10.0 %, respectively (P = 0.632).

Conclusions

Patients with spontaneously ruptured HCC with staged hepatectomy show comparable long-term survival and recurrence pattern as patients with non-ruptured HCC having similar tumor characteristics and liver functional status. Thus, spontaneous HCC rupture may not increase peritoneal recurrence and decrease long-term survival after partial hepatectomy.     

Aggressive management of patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma by combined resection and locoregional therapy

BACKGROUND: Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a high incidence of recurrence. Aggressive management of recurrence is an important strategy in prolonging survival. This study evaluated the role of combined resection and locoregional therapy in the management of selected patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic recurrences. STUDY DESIGN: From a prospective database of 399 patients with hepatectomy for HCC from 1989 to 1998, 63 patients were identified with extrahepatic and intrahepatic recurrences either concurrently or sequentially. Survival outcomes of patients who underwent resection of extrahepatic recurrence and re-resection or locoregional therapy for intrahepatic recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent resection of solitary extrahepatic recurrence and locoregional therapy for intrahepatic recurrence. Transarterial chemoembolization was the main treatment modality for intrahepatic recurrence. Two of these patients also underwent re-resection of intrahepatic recurrence at the time of resection of extrahepatic metastasis. Median survival after recurrence of these 10 patients was 44.0 months (range 18.6 to 132.9 months), and the median overall survival from initial hepatectomy was 49.0 months (range 21.6 to 134.6 months). In contrast, median survival after recurrence of the remaining 53 patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic recurrences treated by nonsurgical means (locoregional therapy, systemic chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy) was only 10.6 months (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive management with combined resection of isolated extrahepatic recurrence and re-resection or locoregional therapy for intrahepatic recurrence may offer longterm survival in selected patients who develop both intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrences after hepatectomy for HCC.