Renal Transplant Register of Andalusia, 2010 Report: survival in relation to the factors used in recipient selection

Kidney transplantation is the best therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In recent years a significant advance has been made in Andalusia in graft and recipient survival as seen in our 2009 publication. In the current work we analyzed 2989 kidney transplantations performed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2009 based on data obtained from the Renal Transplant Registry of Andalusia. We studied the influence on graft and patient survival of factors, such as donor and recipient age, HLA matching, HLA immunization, and duration of previous renal replacement therapy. Patient survival was influenced by age at the time of transplantation and by donor age; the younger the donor, the more it was improved. Graft survival was determined by the donor age group, with no differences at each level according to the recipient age group. No significant differences were observed in patient survival or graft or death-censored graft survival according to HLA matching. Patient and graft survivals were significantly affected by the duration of the previous renal replacement therapy. Despite this being a preliminary study, we have shown the importance of nonmodifiable factors in transplant survival, such as donor and recipient age, with HLA matching having a limited effect. These latter findings should be confirmed in the future by multivariate analyses.     

Donor-recipient age difference - an independent risk factor in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients

Abstract. Whilst HLA matching is routine in renal transplantation the possible benefits of matching donor to recipient age have not been previously explored. The simultaneous effect on graft survival of donor and recipient age was therefore investigated for 274 consecutive first cadaver transplant recipients treated by cyclosporin immunosuppression in two centres. The overall graft survival was 77%, and was not significantly different between the two centres. Individually there was no significant effect of donor or recipient age but taken together, the difference in age significantly affected graft survival ( P < 0.01) regardless of the mode of failure. The 1-year graft survival for all failures was 66.2% when the donor was 5 or more years older, 84.5% when the donor was 5 or more years younger and 71.7% when the donor was within 5 years of the recipient's age. Multivariate analysis, taking into account other variables (HLA matching, dialysis time and type, donor/recipient sex, local/imported kidneys, sensitivity, operation time, total ischaemic time, pre-operative transfusions) indicated that age difference was the single most important variable ( P <0.01). The only other important covariate risk factor in improving graft survival was HLA-DR matching ( P < 0.05). Donor-recipient age difference is a potentially important recipient selection criterion in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant patients.     

Donor-recipient age difference—an independent risk factor in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients

Whilst HLA matching is routine in renal transplantation the possible benefits of matching donor to recipient age have not been previously explored. The simultaneous effect on graft survival of donor and recipient age was therefore investigated for 274 consecutive first cadaver transplant recipients treated by cyclosporin immunosuppression in two centres. The overall graft survival was 77%, and was not significantly different between the two centres. Individually there was no significant effect of donor or recipient age but taken together, the difference in age significantly affected graft survival (P<0.01) regard-less of the mode of failure. The 1-year graft survival for all failures was 66.2% when the donor was 5 or more years older, 84.5% when the donor was 5 or more years younger and 71.7% when the donor was within 5 years of the recipient's age. Multivariate analysis, taking into account other variables (HLA matching, dialysis time and type, donor/recipient sex, local/imported kidneys, sensitivity, operation time, total ischaemic time, pre-operative transfusions) indicated that age difference was the single most important variable (P<0.01). The only other important covariate risk factor in improving graft survival was HLA-DR matching (P<0.05). Donor-recipient age difference is a potentially important recipient selection criterion in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant patients.     

The impact of changing practice on improved outcomes of paediatric renal transplantation in the United Kingdom: a 25 years review

This review reports the outcomes of paediatric renal transplantation in the United Kingdom over the last 25 years. UK Transplant Registry data on 3236 paediatric renal transplants performed between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 2016 were analysed. Significant improvements in human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching have been achieved; 84% of recipients received 000 or favourable (0 DR and 0 or 1 B) mismatched kidneys in 2016 compared with 27% in 1992. The median waiting time has increased from 126 days in 1999 to 351 days in 2016. Tacrolimus replaced ciclosporin in most immunosuppressive regimens after 2002. Renal transplant outcome has improved significantly, mainly because of a reduction in early graft loss. One‐year donation after brain death renal allograft survival for those transplanted from 2012 to 2016 was 98%, compared with 72% for those transplanted from 1987 to 1991. Renal allograft survival for first kidney only transplants at 1, 5, 10, 20 and 25 years were 89%, 79%, 65%, 42% and 33% respectively. Superior survival with living donor was maintained throughout the study period with 25‐year graft survival at 33% compared with 31% from deceased donor (P < 0.0001). Changes in immunosuppression regimens, improvements in HLA matching and a reduction of cold ischaemia time may in part explain the improvements in graft survival.     

Effect of blood group and HLA matching on pancreas graft survival with the use of UW solution

Pancreas graft survival is influenced by various donor and recipient factors. Factors that have posed serious problems to pancreas transplantation have included the limited cold ischemia time, early graft thrombosis, and rejection. A limited cold ischemia time not only causes problems in terms of logistics but also implies limitations with regard to HLA matching and organ exchange. Between August 1988 and August 1989 we performed a prospective, nonrandomized European multicenter study to evaluate the effect of University of Wisconsin (UW) solution on pancreas graft survival. In addition, donor and recipient factors were collected and their influence on graft survival analyzed. Overall pancreas graft survival at 1 and 4 years was 67% and 59%, respectively (n=62). When only simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants were included, the graft survival was 70% and 63% at 1 and 4 years, respectively. The incidence of pancreas graft thrombosis was 8%. Cold ischemia time was not found to significantly influence pancreas graft survival even when it exceeded 12h. Factors that did were HLA-DR matching, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation versus pancreas transplantation alone, and ABO blood group matching. We feel that the use of UW solution for pancreas preservation has contributed to improved pancreas graft survival and has reduced early graft thrombosis despite much longer cold ischemia times of over 12 h. Given this and the significant effect of HLA and blood group matching, we conclude that more attention should be paid to preoperative matching and organ exchange in order to further improve pancreas graft survival.     

HLA mismatches remain risk factors for acute kidney allograft rejection in patients receiving quadruple immunosuppression with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies

BACKGROUND: New immunosuppressive drugs such as anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (aIL2R) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have reduced the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Whether matching donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens is still relevant in patients receiving modern immunosuppression has been questioned. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and risk factors of acute rejection during the first posttransplant year and the impact of acute rejection on long-term graft survival in a cohort of 208 renal transplant patients treated with aIL2R (basiliximab, n=166; daclizumab, n=42), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, n=180; cyclosporin, n=28), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Graft and patient survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for acute rejection were analyzed by logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated for acute rejection (26 biopsy-proven) during the first posttransplant year. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of first-year acute rejection was 13.2%. The number of HLA mismatches (odds ratio [OR] 1.65 per HLA mismatch) and long periods of dialysis before transplantation (OR 3.1 for more than 4 years of dialysis) were the only independent risk factors for first-year acute rejection. First-year acute rejection was associated with a significant reduction in overall and death-censored graft survival at 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent in patients receiving modern immunosuppressive drugs, acute rejection remains an important risk factor for graft loss after renal transplantation. Our results suggest that better HLA matching and shorter periods of dialysis before transplantation could reduce acute rejection rates and further improve outcomes under current immunosuppressive regimens.     

Improved renal allograft survival with selected HLA antigen matching.

We examined the influence of the three most frequent linkage disequilibrium antigen combinations, HLA 1-8, 2-12, and 3-7, on renal allograft survival. We reviewed the results of 214 first transplants to recipients sharing exactly two HLA-A or -B antigens with the donor, excluding failures caused by hyperacute rejection or technical factors. Actuarial graft survival for matches having HLA 1-8, 2-12 or 3-7 was compared with all other two-antigen matches within the group. Improved graft survival, occurred with HLA 1-8 matches (85% and 80% at 2 and 5 years, respectively) and with HLA 2-12 matches (80% at both 2 and 5 years), compared to all other two-antigen matches (71% and 58% at 2 and 5 years, respectively). Allografts matched for HLA 3-7 had poorer graft survival (44% at both 2 and 5 years). We compared nondiabetic and diabetic recipients and found similar improved graft survival with HLA 1-8 or 2-12 matches in nondiabetic recipients. There was no difference, however, in graft survival in diabetic recipients with HLA 1-8 or 2-12 matches, as compared to other two-antigen matches. We conclude that HLA antigen matches of 1-8 or 2-12 between donor and recipient have demonstrated improved graft survival in nondiabetic recipients, while HLA 3-7 matches have poorer survival, as compared to other two-antigen matches. Thus, unlike single antigen serotyping, selected HLA antigen matching appears to afford superior graft survival.     

Living donor kidney transplantation: the effects of donor age and gender on short- and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND: The influence of donor age and sex on acute rejection episodes and short- and long-term graft survival in living donor (LD) kidney transplantation has not been well characterized. METHODS: This prospective cohort study includes 739 first time LD transplantations with median follow-up time of 55.1 months. Death censored graft survival according to donor age and sex was compared with Kaplan-Meier plots. Cox regression was performed to estimate the association between different risk factors and graft survival and acute rejection episodes. RESULTS: Graft survival was not affected by donor age above 50 years as long as these recipients did not experience an early acute rejection episode. Acute rejection episodes increased in recipients of grafts from donors > or =65 years (P=0.009). Donor age > or =65, recipient age less than 50 years, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR matching, and female donor gender were risk factors for early acute rejection episodes. In multivariate analysis donor age > or =65 years was a risk factor for graft loss in all time periods after transplantation. During the first 5 years after transplantation a steroid resistant rejection episode was an additional risk factor. More than 5 years after transplantation male donor gender was the only additional risk factor for graft loss. CONCLUSION: These results support the continued use of older male and female living donors who meet carefully constructed medical criteria and who are highly motivated to donate. Furthermore, donor age seems to be a more important predictor of graft loss than donor sex.     

The impact of gender and age matching for long-term graft survival in living donor renal transplantation

In renal transplantation, donor age and allograft size are known to have an important influence on the outcome of the graft reflecting functional renal mass. Women tend to have smaller kidneys with 17% fewer nephrons than male kidneys. The number of glomeruli per kidney as well as the mean glomerular volume closely correlate with kidney weight and negatively correlate with subject age. We evaluated the impact of gender and age matching in living-donor renal transplantation on long-term graft survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups were discerned among 614 renal transplants, according to donor and recipient gender: Group 1 was male donor to male recipient; Group 2 was male donor to female recipient; Group 3 was female donor to male recipient; and Group 4 was female donor to female recipient. We analyzed long-term graft survival and risk factors between the four groups as well as according to age matching. Statistical significance was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test (P < .05). RESULT: The graft survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 92.62%, 88.13%, 82.37%, and 76.07%, respectively. The risk factors affecting long-term graft survival were donor age, donor gender, acute rejection rate, and HLA-DR matching. Among the four groups, the graft survival rates of Group 3 (female donor to male recipient) were significantly different from the other groups (P = .0165). Also, the long-term graft survival rates according to age differences were significantly different between older donors than recipients and younger donors than recipients in each group (P = .0213). CONCLUSION: The importance of inadequate renal mass is magnified in high-risk recipients. Age matching could perhaps improve the results of transplantation, particularly when kidneys from older donors are used. Consideration of age and gender as criteria for the choice of donors and recipients may be considered in organ allocation.     

Immunologic Prognostic Factors of Renal Allograft Survival

IntroductionSuccessful outcome of renal transplantation depends on various factors, of which immunologic is one of the most important. Accumulated experience of a single center, with the same surgical and immunological team contributes significantly to safe conclusions. Purpose of this study was the evaluation of potential factors, in particular immunologic, that influence renal allograft survival.Patients and MethodsDuring the period 1991–2013, 20,784 surgical operations have been performed in our Department of Surgery – Transplant Unit, of which 575 were renal transplantations. We examined donor and recipient demographic factors, immunologic characteristics along with patient and graft survival.ResultsRenal allograft was retrieved from living-related donor in 103 cases and in 472 from cadaveric donor. Donor age was 46.7 ± 18.5 years old and 49.9% (287) were male. Recipient age was 48 ± 12.3 years old and 402 were male. HLA histocompatibility was carefully matched resulting in 85.5% renal transplants with 2–4 HLA mismatches and 93.8% renal transplants with at least one HLA-DR. Renal graft survival the first, fifth and tenth year was 89%, 76%, and 67% and patient survival was respectively 95%, 89% and 83%. Statistical analysis revealed that only donor age influenced renal graft survival (P < .05). HLA mismatches were not correlated with graft survival (log rank P = .495), but identification of panel reactive antibodies (PRA) class I and class II post transplantation had a statistically significant impact on long term renal graft survival (log rank P < .001 and P = .021, accordingly).ConclusionsAnalysis of potential prognostic factor showed that only donor age was correlated with allograft survival. Development of PRA following renal transplantation influenced long term graft survival. Good HLA matching with at least one HLA DR resulted in excellent graft and patient survival.     

Factors influencing second renal allograft survival: a single center experience in China

Second renal transplants are historically associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to assess long-term survival of second renal grafts from deceased donors performed at our center and to analyze risk factors associated with long-term graft outcome. Sixty-five second renal grafts were enrolled into this study, and compared to primary ones performed during the same period. Kaplan-Meier curve showed a graft survival rate of 89.2% at 1 year, 80% at 3 years, and 63.1% at 5 years, which were similar to that of primary graft. Univariate analysis showed that time to first graft loss, cold ischaemia time, HLA mismatch, primary maintenance immunosuppressant, acute rejection episodes, and serum creatinine at 1 year were significantly associated with regraft survival. Cox regression demonstrated the dominant effect of acute rejection episodes, primary maintenance immunosuppressant, serum creatinine at 1 year, and time to first graft loss as predictor of second graft outcome. However, when long-term survival of second graft was examined on the basis of Kaplan-Meier estimates, HLA mismatch was found to be significant. The second graft had more benefits of improved pre-transplant screening and post-transplant management, and its survival rate was satisfactory and similar to that of primary one. Immunologic factors such as acute rejection and primary immunosuppressant are the main determinants of long-term renal transplantation outcome.     

The effect of body mass index on long-term renal allograft survival

BACKGROUND: A number of factors have been implicated in decreasing long-term renal graft survival. Factors such as living versus cadaveric donor status, acute rejection, and HLA matching have been studied in detail. Mild obesity defined as a body mass index (BMI) of >25 has been found to have a deleterious effect on a number of physiologic processes. We studied the effect of a BMI >25 on long-term renal transplantation outcome. METHODS: A total of 405 patients who underwent transplantation at Saint Barnabas Medical Center from 1990 to 1997 were evaluated. All known variables impacting on long-term graft function were collected. Multivariate analysis utilizing the Cox-proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival were applied to these risk factors. RESULTS: BMI >25 was isolated as an independent risk factor for both decreased graft survival and patient survival (relative risk 2.0 for each). Cadaveric donor status, acute rejection, and use of azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil were the only other significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Mild obesity before transplantation has a negative impact on long-term renal graft and patient survival.     

The impact of donor variables on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Morphologic characteristics of the graft have been proposed as a major contributor to the long-term outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Our objective was to determine the impact of donor variables, including donor age, donor-recipient HLA match, and type of donation (DCD vs donation after brain death [DBD]), on the outcome of OLT in 192 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Fourteen patients underwent OLT from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors and 188 from DBD donors. Mean donor age, warm ischemia time at recovery, and cold ischemia time were similar between the groups. Overall graft survival rate at 1 year (55% DCD vs 85% DBD) and 5 years (46% DCD vs 78% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0003). Similarly, patient survival rate at 1 year (62% DCD vs 93% DBD) and 5 years (62% DCD vs 82% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0295). Incidences of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and primary nonfunction were similar between the DCD and DBD groups. The incidence of liver abscess with ischemic-type biliary stricture was higher in recipients from DCD as compared with DBD (42% vs 2%). A trend toward lower graft survival was noted in recipients from donors older than 60 years of age in the HCV population (P = .07), with statistically lower patient survival (P = .02). Donor- recipient HLA matching did not appear to correlate with OLT outcome in patients with HCV. DCD donors and donors older than 60 years of age significantly impact patient and graft survival. Lower graft and patient survival in recipients from DCD donors does not appear to be related to early disease recurrence.     

Immunosuppression with antithymocyte globulin in renal transplantation: better long-term graft survival

We analyzed the impact of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in renal transplantation. We retrospectively studied 1217 recipients performed from July 83 to December 03. ATG-Fresenius-S (ATG-F) was used for induction therapy in 492 patients (40.4%; group I) and compared with group II, 725 patients (59.6%), without antilymphocyte induction. Groups were comparable in terms of recipient gender and race distribution; time on dialysis; cause of renal disease; number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches; donor age, gender, and creatinine; and cold ischemia time. Patients with ATG-F were younger (35.8 +/- 13.8 vs 38.9 +/- 12.5 years, P < .001), more frequently hypersensitized (10% vs 3%, P < .001), and had more second transplants (15.7% vs 5.8%, P < .001). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was lower among ATG-F patients (23.6% vs 32.1%, P = .004). Admission time and incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) were similar in the two groups. Graft survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 88.9%, 80.7%, 71.3%, and 64.9% in group I and 86.4%, 77.4%, 60.7%, and 48.4% in group II (P = .003). The difference in patient survival over the same follow-up did not reach statistical significance. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of graft failure was higher for those who did not receive ATG-F (HR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.00; P = .004). Donor age and DGF were also independent predictors of graft failure. Our results showed a better long-term graft survival among patients who received ATG-F, despite their higher immunological risk. The absence of induction with ATG-F, donor age, and DGF were independent risk factors for graft failure.     

Late renal allograft failure between 1990 and 1998 in Spain: a changing scenario

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study time-dependent modifications in the characteristics of renal transplants in Spain during the 1990s and risk factors associated with death-censored graft failure after the first year. METHODS: A total of 3,365 adult patients who underwent transplantation in 1990, 1994, and 1998 with a functioning graft after the first year were included. RESULTS: Ten-year patient and graft survival rates were 82% and 70%. Major modifications between 1990 and 1998 were increases in donor age (32 +/- 15 to 43 +/- 18 years, P<0.0001) and number of HLA mismatches (2.8 +/- 1.2 to 3.2 +/- 1.2, P<0.0001). Acute rejection decreased from 39% to 25% (P<0.0001), and the prevalence recipients with hepatitis C virus decreased from 29% to 10% (P<0.0001). The use of lipid-lowering agents during the first year increased from 6% to 41% (P<0.0001). Projected renal allograft half-life estimate was 15.4 (range, 14.1-16.8) years in 1990 and 17.7 (range, 14.0-21.4) in 1998 (P=0.007). Independent variables associated with graft survival were as follows: recipient age, last panel-reactive antibodies, acute rejection, hepatitis C virus antibodies in the recipient, triglycerides, serum creatinine and proteinuria at 3 months, and the increase of serum creatinine and proteinuria between the 3rd and 12th month. The use of statins during the first year was associated with a decreased risk for graft loss. CONCLUSION: Despite worsening of surrogate parameters of renal quality and poorer HLA matching, graft survival improved during the 1990s in Spain.     

Interaction of mycophenolate mofetil and HLA matching on renal allograft survival

INTRODUCTION: The importance of HLA matching for renal transplantation outcomes has been appreciated for several decades. It has been hypothesized that as pharmacologic immunosuppression becomes stronger and more specific, the impact of HLA matching may be vanishing. Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) has been demonstrated to both decrease acute rejection and improve three-year graft survival. It is possible that with new immunosuppressive regimens containing MMF the relative effect of HLA matching may be altered. To determine the relative impact of HLA matching in patients on MMF we undertook an analysis of the United States Renal Transplant Data Registry (USRDS). METHODS: All primary, solitary renal transplants registered at the USRDS between January 1995 and June 1997, on initial immunosuppression that included either MMF or AZA were followed until June 1998. Primary study end points were graft and patient survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare AZA vs. MMF treated patients by HLA mismatch. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the interaction between HLA mismatch and AZA versus MMF therapy on the study endpoints. All multivariate analyses were corrected for 13 potential confounding pretransplant variables including intention to treat immunosuppression. RESULTS: A total of 19,675 patients were analyzed (8,459 on MMF and 11,216 on AZA). Overall three year graft survival was higher in the MMF group when compared to the AZA group (87% vs. 84% respectively P<0.001). For both AZA and MMF three-year graft survival improved with fewer HLA donor-recipient mismatches. Comparing zero antigen mismatches to six antigen mismatches, the relative improvement was comparable for both patients on AZA (92.4% vs. 80.6%) and MMF (95.2% vs. 82.9%). By Cox proportional hazard model the relative risk for graft loss decreased significantly in both the AZA and MMF treated patients with increased HLA matching. CONCLUSION: The use of MMF does not obviate the benefits of HLA matching, while HLA matching does not minimize the benefits of MMF on long term graft survival. Our study would suggest that HLA matching and MMF therapy are additive factors in decreasing the risk for renal allograft loss.     

HLA mismatch is important for 20-year graft survival in kidney transplant patients

BackgroundHuman leukocyte antigens (HLA) matching is gradually being omitted from clinical practice in evaluation for renal allograft transplant. While such practices may yield shorter wait times and adequate short-term outcomes, graft longevity in HLA mismatched patients remains unclear. This study aims to demonstrate that HLA matching may still play an important role in long-term graft survival.MethodsWe identified patients undergoing an index kidney transplant in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from 1990 to 1999, with one-year graft survival. The primary outcome of the analysis was graft survival beyond 10 years. We explored the long-lasting impact of HLA mismatches by landmarking the analysis at established time points.ResultsWe identified 76,530 patients receiving renal transplants in the time frame, 23,914 from living donors and 52,616 from deceased donors. On multivariate analysis, more HLA mismatches were associated with worse graft survival beyond 10 years for both living and deceased donor allografts. HLA mismatch continued to remain an essential factor in the long term.ConclusionsA greater number of HLA mismatches was associated with progressively worse long-term graft survival for patients. Our analysis reinforces the importance of HLA matching in the preoperative evaluation of renal allografts.     

影响致敏患者移植肾存活的危险因素分析

目的探讨影响致敏患者移植肾存活的危险因素,以提高致敏患者移植肾长期存活率。方法对102例接受肾移植的致敏患者的资料进行回顾性分析,用KaplanMeier计算移植肾1、3、5年存活率,用LogRank进行单因素分析、Cox模型多因素回归分析,计算相对危险度。结果术后随访(30±2)个月,未出现超急性排斥反应,发生急性排斥反应33例,经激素及抗淋巴细胞抗体治疗后,25例逆转;16例移植肾功能丧失,其中7例死亡,死亡原因为肺部感染5例,心血管疾病2例;人/肾1、3、5年存活率分别为95%/90%、93%/85%、93%/75%;单因素及多因素分析表明,受者年龄、移植次数、HLA相配程度、PRA水平、移植后PRA升高、移植肾功能恢复正常的时间、血肌酐水平、移植肾功能恢复延迟、急性排斥反应及感染等10个因素对移植肾的存活有重要或非常重要影响。结论良好控制影响移植肾存活的危险因素,致敏患者肾移植同样能取得满意的效果。     

Factors affecting graft survival after living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been considered as an alternative option to resolve the shortage of cadaveric donor organs, despite the ethical aspects of the donor procedure. The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors affecting graft survival in LDLT. From June 1996 to December 2002, 141 patients who underwent LDLT were retrospectively analyzed. Graft survival rates were 82.5%, 80%, 77.3%, and 77.3% at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively. The factors influencing graft survival in univariate analysis were graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR) less than 0.8% (P = .0009), intraoperative transfusion of more than six packed RBC units in addition to the use of cell saver amounts (P = .0001), left lobe grafts in adults causing small-for-size situations (P = .0135), and donor age (P = .0472). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that GRWR less than 0.8% (P = .002) and intraoperative transfusion of more than six packed RBC units (P = .014) were independent factors that decreased graft survival rates. The graft selection of greater than 0.8% of GRWR and reduction of intraoperative RBC transfusion improve graft survival.     

Factors contributing to long-term kidney graft survival in Eurotransplant.

We examined the graft survival of 12,883 first unrelated kidney grafts from nonliving donors, transplanted between 1 January 1971 and 31 December 1987 within 52 renal transplantation centers participating in the Eurotransplant organization. The 5-year graft survival increased from 38.8% for the period 1971-1975 to 66.0% for the period 1981-1987 for patients treated with cyclosporine, whereas the half-life increased by only 2 years, from 9.7 years to 11.6 years over the same period, based on grafts functioning at 1 year posttransplantation. Results per HLA locus showed considerable improvements within mismatch groups over the entire period. Large differences between mismatch groups for the early years were observed, but within the cyclosporine era only HLA-B showed a statistically significant difference in half-lives (13.2 versus 9.0 years, for 0 and 2 mismatches respectively, P = 0.013). When other prognostic factors were taken into account, it was revealed by means of an exponential model that number of HLA-B mismatches, donor and recipient age and sex, and recipient diagnosis of diabetes had significant effects on the long-term outcome of the grafts. Depending on the combination of these parameters, estimates of half-life varied from 4.9 to 14.5 years. These results show that matching for HLA-B is still of benefit in the longer term and that other prognostic factors play an important role in predicting the late outcome of renal allografts.