Wheal-and-flare reactions induced by allergen and histamine: evaluation of blood flow with laser Doppler flowmetry

Dermal blood flow was evaluated after skin prick test with histamine and allergen in six patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Blood flow was registered continuously for 60 minutes after the test procedure with laser doppler flowmetry, which allows noninvasive measurements. Blood flow was measured close to the skin test in the wheal obtained, and at a greater distance from the prick in the flare reaction. Tests were performed with preloaded skin test needles with histamine and the appropriate allergen freeze-dried on the point of the lancet, as well as with the appropriate negative control. The prick test procedure, by itself, induced a transient increase in blood flow that was normalized again after 9 minutes for the closest measurement. Histamine induced a rapid increase in blood flow in both the flare and wheal reaction that was normalized after about 45 minutes. The increase was significantly higher in the flare compared to the wheal for the time points from 6 1/2 to 13 minutes. Allergen induced a similar increase in blood flow. However, the increase was not noticeable until 2 1/2 minutes after the allergen application and was not completely abolished within 60 minutes. Furthermore, the difference between the flare and wheal reaction, with the higher values for the flare reaction, was present for a longer period of time than for the equivalent histamine measurements. In conclusion, laser doppler flowmetry appears useful for continuous evaluation of vascular changes induced at skin prick tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Herbal supplements and skin testing: the lack of effect of commonly used herbal supplements on histamine skin prick testing

BACKGROUND: The use of herbal supplements is common, yet little is known about their pharmacologic properties. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of 23 commonly used herbal supplements on histamine skin prick testing (SPT). METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, crossover study. Wheal and flare responses to SPT with histamine phosphate (1 mg/ml) were measured before and 4 h after administration of each of the 23 popular herbal supplements, fexofenadine (60 mg) and placebo. Wheal and flare areas were recorded with tracings performed 10 min after the prick test and measured with a PC-digitizer using stereometric software. RESULTS: Fexofenadine significantly suppressed the wheal (P < 0.001) and flare (P = 0.02) areas compared with placebo. None of the herbal supplements caused significant suppression of the wheal and flare areas compared with placebo (P > 0.10). CONCLUSION: When taken in single-doses, the popular herbal supplements tested did not significantly affect the histamine skin response. Therefore, it seems unnecessary for clinicians to ask patients to discontinue these herbal supplements prior to allergy skin testing.     

Skin reactions to histamine of healthy subjects after hypnotically induced emotions of sadness, anger, and happiness

BACKGROUND: The severity of symptoms in asthma and other hypersensitivity-related disorders has been associated with changes in mood but little is known about the mechanisms possibly mediating such a relationship. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of mood on skin reactivity to histamine by comparing the effects of hypnotically induced emotions on flare and wheal reactions to cutaneous histamine prick tests. METHODS: Fifteen highly hypnotically susceptible volunteers had their cutaneous reactivity to histamine measured before hypnosis at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 15 min after the histamine prick. These measurements were repeated under three hypnotically induced emotions of sadness, anger, and happiness presented in a counterbalanced order. Skin reactions were measured as change in histamine flare and wheal area in mm2 per minute. RESULTS: The increase in flare reaction in the time interval from 1 to 3 min during happiness and anger was significantly smaller than flare reactions during sadness (P<0.05). No effect of emotion was found for wheal reactions. Hypnotic susceptibility scores were associated with increased flare reactions at baseline (r=0.56; P<0.05) and during the condition of happiness (r=0.56; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results agree with previous studies showing mood to be a predictor of cutaneous immediate-type hypersensitivity and histamine skin reactions. The results are also in concordance with earlier findings of an association between hypnotic susceptibility and increased reactivity to an allergen.     

Cetirizine inhibits bradykinin-induced cutaneous wheal and flare in atopic and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: Kinins are vasoactive mediators involved in allergic reactions. When applied on the skin or in the nose, bradykinin (BK) elicits inflammation that is poorly affected by previous H1-blockade. The aim of this study was to compare the possible effect of cetirizine (an H1-antagonist) on wheal and flare responses to BK, histamine, and compound 48/80 in atopic and healthy subjects. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, eight atopic and eight healthy subjects received cetirizine (10 mg/day) or placebo for 3 days before cutaneous tests. Intradermal tests (IDT) and prick tests (PT) were performed with BK (20 nmol/ml for IDT and 20 micromol/ml for PT), histamine (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT), and compound 48/80 (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT) as positive controls and saline as negative control. The skin responses were monitored by measurement of wheal and flare areas. RESULTS: BK, histamine, and 48/80 induced wheal and flare reactions in all placebo-treated subjects. Histamine elicited larger wheal and flare reactions than BK and 48/80. IDT with BK induced four- to sixfold larger wheal and flare reaction than PT. No differences in BK-induced wheal and flare were observed between atopic and healthy subjects. In atopic subjects, cetirizine induced a significant reduction of flare reactions after the BK test (80% for IDT, and 94% for PT [P < 0.01]). Moreover, cetirizine reduced significantly BK-induced wheals by 70% for IDT (P < 0.01) and 65% for PT (P < 0.01). A similar inhibiting effect of cetirizine was also observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed that the wheal and flare reactions induced by BK challenge were markedly inhibited by previous intake of cetirizine. The mechanism by which this effect is mediated cannot be established at present.     

Cetirizine inhibits bradykinin-induced cutaneous wheal and flare in atopic and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: Kinins are vasoactive mediators involved in allergic reactions. When applied on the skin or in the nose, bradykinin (BK) elicits inflammation that is poorly affected by previous H1-blockade. The aim of this study was to compare the possible effect of cetirizine (an H1-antagonist) on wheal and flare responses to BK, histamine, and compound 48/80 in atopic and healthy subjects. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, eight atopic and eight healthy subjects received cetirizine (10 mg/day) or placebo for 3 days before cutaneous tests. Intradermal tests (IDT) and prick tests (PT) were performed with BK (20 nmol/ml for IDT and 20 micromol/ml for PT), histamine (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT), and compound 48/80 (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT) as positive controls and saline as negative control. The skin responses were monitored by measurement of wheal and flare areas. RESULTS: BK, histamine, and 48/80 induced wheal and flare reactions in all placebo-treated subjects. Histamine elicited larger wheal and flare reactions than BK and 48/80. IDT with BK induced four- to six-fold larger wheal and flare reaction than PT. No differences in BK-induced wheal and flare were observed between atopic and healthy subjects. In atopic subjects, cetirizine induced a significant reduction of flare reactions after the BK test (80% for IDT, and 94% for PT [P<0.01]). Moreover, cetirizine reduced significantly BK-induced wheals by 70% for IDT (P<0.01) and 65% for PT (P<0.01). A similar inhibiting effect of cetirizine was also observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed that the wheal and flare reactions induced by BK challenge were markedly inhibited by previous intake of cetirizine. The mechanism by which this effect is mediated cannot be established at present.     

Diagnosis and Immunotherapy of Mould Allergy

To determine reproducibility and the optimal way of expressing skin sensitivity, simultaneous skin prick tests (SPT) and intradermal tests (ICT) were performed on 25 mould-allergic patients. The patients had a well-documented history of allergy to Cladosporium and Alternaria and were tested with partially purified standardized extracts of these two mould species. Skin prick tests were carried out on the volar side of the forearm and intradermal tests on the backs of the patients. The skin tests were performed as titration using quadruplicate determinations of 10-fold allergen dilutions. The area of the skin reactions measured by planimetry were plotted in a log-log system as a function of the allergen concentration. The reproducibility (SD/mean area X 100%) of the ICTs was significantly higher than that of the SPTs (17% versus 29%). A very low reproducibility was found with wheal areas less than 5 mm2. The dose response curve of the SPT wheal area was steeper than that obtained with ICT, both concerning ICT wheal and flare. Increasing the allergen concentration with a factor 10 resulted in a doubling of the wheal area in SPT, in contrast to a factor 1.7 using ICT. The coefficient of correlation using linear regression on the dose response curve was always higher than 0.9 with SPT and ICT wheal, but significantly lower with ICT flare. Skin sensitivity was estimated as end-point and histamine equivalent reaction. No significant correlation between SPT and ICT end-point titration was found contrary to the histamine equivalent reaction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative activity of cetirizine and desloratadine on histamine-induced wheal-and-flare responses during 24 hours.

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine and desloratadine are antihistamines active in the treatment of symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. OBJECTIVE: To compare the antihistamine activity of desloratadine, the active metabolite of loratadine, with that of cetirizine in the skin wheal-and-flare responses during 24 hours. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single oral dose, crossover study. Skin reaction to histamine (100 mg/mL), administered by prick tests, was measured by the wheal and flare surface areas for 24 hours (before treatment and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours). Eighteen healthy volunteers (mean age, 33.9 years; 13 women) participated in this study. The areas under the curves of the wheal-and-flare responses as a function of time (primary efficacy variables) were compared using analysis of variance. RESULTS: A highly significant overall treatment effect (P < .001) was detected for wheal and flare inhibition, with the activity of cetirizine and desloratadine significantly superior to that of placebo (P < .001). In addition, the activity of cetirizine was significantly superior to that of desloratadine (P < .001). With desloratadine, only 3 of the 18 subjects achieved a wheal inhibition of at least 70%, occurring between 2 and 4 hours, whereas all subjects using cetirizine reached a wheal inhibition of at least 70% between 0.5 and 3 hours (median time, 1.7 hours). The difference between the 2 active drugs was highly significant (P < .001). The median duration of wheal inhibition of at least 70% was zero with placebo and desloratadine and was 21.9 hours with cetirizine (P < .001). No serious adverse events were reported, and no subject withdrew from the study due to an adverse event. CONCLUSION: Cetirizine was associated with significantly greater suppression of skin reactivity to histamine compared with desloratadine during 24 hours after a single dose, with a consistent duration of action for cetirizine, as previously reported.     

Influence of the histamine control on skin reactivity in skin testing

We investigated the effect of the histamine control (1 mg/ml) on the results of skin prick and intradermal testing with bee and wasp venom. Skin tests were done on the patients' forearms: on the right arm the histamine control and the bee venom dilutions, on the left arm the wasp venom dilutions only, at distances of 4-5 cm. In intradermal testing 11 (9%) of 122 patients showed a positive wheal and flare reaction to the bee venom solution positioned next to the histamine control. The subsequent solutions in higher concentrations did not produce any skin reactions. The results of intradermal testing with bee venom did not occur in intradermal testing with wasp venom or in skin prick testing with both allergens. Our results show clearly that in skin prick tests a distance of 4-5 cm is sufficient to avoid false positive skin reactions. However, using the same distance in intradermal testing showed that histamine affects the skin reactions produced by adjacent allergen solutions. Therefore false positive results may occur.     

Comparison of the effects of levocetirizine and loratadine on histamine-induced wheal, flare, and itch in human skin

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, crossover study compared the effects of the R-enantiomer of cetirizine, levocetirizine, with those of loratadine on the wheal, flare, and itch response to histamine in human skin. METHODS: Levocetirizine (5 mg), loratadine (10 mg), or placebo was taken orally 4 h before the intradermal injection of histamine (20 microl, 100 microM) or the control vehicle into the forearm skin of healthy volunteers. Flare areas were assessed by scanning laser Doppler imaging before and at 30-s intervals for a period of 9 min. Wheal areas were measured by planimetry at 10 min. Itch was scored every 30 s with a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: After placebo administration, the mean peak flare area was 23.01+/-1.94 cm(2), the wheal area 248+/-27 mm(2), and the cumulative itch score 28.8+/-4.6% (mean+/-SEM). Levocetirizine reduced the flare, wheal, and itch by 60%, 68%, and 91%, respectively (all P<0.001, Student's t-test for paired data). The effects of loratadine were variable and not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Levocetirizine (5 mg) is a potent inhibitor of the effects of histamine in human skin with an efficacy that exceeded that of loratadine (10 mg) when single doses of the drugs were administered 4 h before the test.     

A comparison of levocetirizine and desloratadine in the histamine-induced wheal and flare response in human skin in vivo

Background The histamine-induced wheal and flare response was used to compare quantitatively the antihistaminic potency of levocetirizine and desloratadine. Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, 24 healthy male non-atopic volunteers received weekly single doses of 1.25, 2.5 or 5 mg levocetirizine, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg desloratadine, or placebo. Four hours after dosing, histamine (100 mg/ml) skin prick tests were performed on the volar surface of both forearms. The diameters of the wheals and flares were measured 10 minutes later. Sedation was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and a motricity test. The effects of individual drug doses were compared using Student’s t-test for paired data and the overall effects of the two drugs by ANOVA. Results All doses of levocetirizine significantly (P < 0.0001) inhibited both wheals and flares in a dose-related manner. Only the 10 mg dose of desloratadine achieved significant inhibition of response. ANOVA showed levocetirizine to be significantly (P < 0.0001) more active than desloratadine. Neither drug caused significant sedation or loss of motricity. Conclusion Levocetirizine is significantly more effective than desloratadine in inhibiting wheal and flare responses to histamine in human skin in vivo, with 1.25 mg levocetirizine being more effective than 10 mg desloratadine. Received 3 July 2005; returned for revision 9 August 2005; returned for final revision 6 February 2006; accepted by M. Parnham 8 February 2006     

Twenty-four hours of activity of cetirizine and fexofenadine in the skin.

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine and fexofenadine, the active metabolite of terfenadine, are powerful and well-tolerated H1 receptor antagonists effective in the treatment of skin and nose atopic diseases. OBJECTIVE: We have compared the pharmacodynamic activity of the two antihistamines at therapeutic dosages, cetirizine at 10 mg and fexofenadine at 120 mg and 180 mg, on histamine-induced skin reactivity during a 24-hour period after single intake. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study. The areas of wheal and flare induced by histamine (100 mg/mL) administered by prick test were measured at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours postdose. Statistical analysis of the areas under the time-response curves was performed by a Friedman's ANOVA followed by a Wilcoxon test and Bonferroni's correction. RESULTS: The three active treatments clearly inhibited the wheal and flare areas throughout the 24-hour period compared with placebo. Maximal inhibition occurred at 4 hours postdose. Between 4 and 24 hours postdose, the time course of inhibition by cetirizine differed significantly (P < 0.001) from that by fexofenadine at either dose, which did not differ from each other. At 24 hours, fexofenadine inhibited <40% of the skin reaction, whereas cetirizine reduced 60% of the wheal. The duration of effect, considered as the time for wheal to be inhibited by at least 70%, also significantly favored cetirizine (19 hours) compared with fexofenadine (9.3 and 8.5 hours for 180 and 120 mg, respectively; P < 0.001). Consistency of activity was evaluated by the frequency of total inhibition of the wheal (> or =95%). Consistency was observed in 26 of 26 participants for cetirizine, 21 of 26 for fexofenadine, 180 mg, and 10 of 26 for fexofenadine, 120 mg (P < 0.001), suggesting better consistency for cetirizine. There was no serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly shows better duration of action and consistency of the antihistaminic activity of cetirizine compared with fexofenadine (120 and 180 mg) in the histamine-induced skin reaction during a 24-hour period.     

Suppressive effects of histamine skin reactivity by a nonsedating antihistamine-mequitazine.

The suppressive activity of mequitazine (MQZ) on histamine skin reactivity was evaluated in 29 healthy subjects (age 22-25 years) in a single-blind study. Fifteen subjects received MQZ, at a dosage of 5 mg BID, for 7 days while 14 served as controls. A prick skin test with saline or histamine hydrochloride (1 mg/ml and 10 mg/ml) was performed in duplicate, on both forearms, starting from the baseline day and continuing for 4 days after medication had been discontinued (total of 11 days). The skin-test subject and the reader was unaware of the randomization process. Mean diameters of wheal and flare as well as the skin index scores (after Voorhost) were used in the analysis. Maximal flare suppression (as compared to the baseline values) was observed on day 6 (97% suppression for 1 mg/ml and 54% suppression for 10 mg/ml, p less than 0.01). Suppression of wheal size was significant (19% for 1 mg/ml and 28% for 10 mg/ml) but was not clinically relevant. Suppression of skin index scores was maximal on day 6 (71% for 1 mg/ml and 43% for 10 mg/ml, p less than 0.01). After MQZ had been discontinued, all measurements gradually returned to baseline values and were not different therefrom within 3 days. However, final measurements of wheal and flare were smaller than baseline values (60-94% of baselines). We conclude that MQZ, at the manufacturers's recommended dose of 5 mg BID, significantly suppressed flare size of histamine skin tests and recommend that MQZ be discontinued for at least 3 days prior to performing allergy skin tests.     

Lack of subsensitivity to terfenadine during long-term terfenadine treatment

Eleven healthy male volunteers ingested terfenadine, 60 mg, every 12 hours for 56 days. Compliance was monitored strictly throughout the study. Before the first terfenadine dose on day 0, and 12 hours after the evening terfenadine dose every seventh day and on randomly selected "unscheduled" days, wheal-and-flare areas were measured after intradermal injections of 0.01 ml of histamine phosphate (1.0 mg/ml and 0.1 mg/ml). On days 0, 28, and 56, six volunteers had skin tests hourly for 12 hours after the morning terfenadine dose. On all study days, serum terfenadine metabolite I concentrations were measured each time histamine skin tests were performed. On days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, and 56, the mean areas of the histamine-induced wheals did not differ significantly from each other but were significantly decreased compared to the mean wheal area on day 0 (p less than 0.01). On these days, the mean areas of the histamine-induced flares also did not differ significantly from each other but remained significantly suppressed compared to the mean flare areas on day 0 (p less than 0.01). Wheal-and-flare suppression was noted in all unscheduled histamine skin tests performed 12 hours after the evening terfenadine dose. In the subgroup of volunteers who had hourly tests, on day 0, the mean wheal-and-flare areas were significantly suppressed from 2 to 12 hours after the dose, with maximal wheal suppression occurring at 5 hours (p less than 0.05) and maximal flare suppression occurring from 3 to 9 hours (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of ranitidine, alone and in combination with clemastine, on allergen-induced cutaneous wheal-and-flare reactions in human skin

The effect of intradermal ranitidine (administered alone and in combination with clemastine) on allergen-mediated wheal-and-flare reactions has been evaluated in a double-blind study on 10 healthy atopic volunteers. Ranitidine alone, administered in doses over a 10(4)-fold concentration range, had no effect on the size either of allergen-induced wheal or flare reactions. Clemastine alone evoked a dose-related inhibition of both wheal and flare. Compared to the inhibition achieved by clemastine alone, the combination of ranitidine with clemastine produced a small but significant increase in inhibition of allergen-induced flare at ranitidine concentrations of 10(-5) mol/L (p less than 0.001) and 10(-6) mol/L (p less than 0.01), and of allergen-induced wheal at ranitidine concentration 10(-5) mol/L (p less than 0.01). Our results provide further evidence for the presence of cutaneous histamine H2 receptors and their participation in the formation of allergen-mediated skin reactions but indicate that the contribution of cutaneous histamine H2-receptor stimulation to the production of immediate wheal-and-flare reactions evoked by allergen is only modest.     

A Mononuclear Cell-Derived Histamine Releasing Factor in Asthmatic Patients

In an attempt to study the role of lymphokines in asthma, lymphocytes from asthmatic patients were stimulated in vitro with skin test-positive allergen (dust mite) or with non-specific mitogen-phytohaemagglutinin for 4 h, then washed carefully and cultured alone for 16 h. Cell-free supernatants were subsequently collected and applied in the basophil histamine release test in vitro and in bronchial provocation test and skin prick test in vivo. Supernatant of non-stimulated lymphocytes from asthmatic patients released significant amounts of histamine from basophils. Stimulation of lymphocytes with specific allergen or phytohaemagglutinin augmented the supernatant-induced histamine release. Lymphocyte supernatants from the majority of patients also induced bronchoconstriction and elicited skin wheal and flare reaction in vivo.     

Histamine is released in the wheal but not the flare following challenge of human skin in vivo: a microdialysis study

Background The mediator mechanisms of the cutaneous wheal and flare response, which underlies allergic skin and urticarial conditions, are controversial. The wheal results primarily from a direct effect of histamine on the local vascular bed, but to what extent does histamine diffuse within the wheal? The flare is neurogenic in origin, being disseminated within the dermis by axon reflexes, but do the neuropeptides released from the nerve endings cause the vasodilatation directly or do they induce the further release of histamine which then transduces the fiare? Objective We have addressed these questions by inserting 216 μm diameter microdialysis fibres into the dermis within the different areas of the wheal and flare to monitor changes in histamine levels provoked by intradermal injections of histamine, allergen, codeine and substance P. Twenty-one subjects participated in the investigations. Results The histamine concentration in unprovoked skin was 10.5 ± 0.6 nM. As the dialysis efficacy was 50%, this equates to tissue concentrations of 20 nM. All provicants released large amounts of histamine at the injection site, maximum histamine levels being 337–1293 nM. Diffusion of histamine within the wheai was poor, levels at 2.3 mm and 3.7 mm from the site of injection being 4–22% and 0.2–3.7% respectively of those 1 mm from the injection site. No increased histamine levels were detected in the flare with any provicant. Atraumatic delivery to the skin of histamine in infusion concentrations of 30–10000 nM caused concentration-related effects, at least 100 nM being necessary to induce a significant increase in skin blood flow, a threshold of 300–1000 being required to stimulate a visible flare and a measurable erythema, and 3000–10000 nM being the minimum for induction of a wheal. Thus the skin blood vessels and nerves are responsive to histamine, but at relatively high concentrations Conclusions These data support the theory that the flare reaction to local histamine injection or release is a neurogenic reflex not involving histamine release at its effector end.     

Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device

Epicutaneous skin testing is a useful diagnostic tool in evaluating allergic disorders. Utilizing the Multitest device, skin prick test responses to codeine phosphate, histamine phosphate, and ragweed were examined in 56 human subjects. Relationships between the two positive controls, codeine and histamine, and their use as a reference denominator for ragweed reactions were assessed. Ragweed elicited detectable wheals in 15/56. Histamine phosphate (2.75 mg/mL) elicited a positive wheal response in 52/56 subjects, while codeine phosphate elicited a positive wheal in 39/56 and 30/56 subjects at 30 and 3 mg/mL, respectively. Wheal sizes for codeine phosphate at both 30 and 3 mg/mL showed significantly concordant relationships with histamine phosphate-induced wheal sizes (Spearman rho, P = .0084 and .0155, respectively); however the intersubject coefficient of variation was lower for histamine-induced wheal sizes (44%) than for codeine-induced wheal sizes (64% and 65%, respectively for 30 and 3 mg/mL). When a ratio of allergen to positive control reaction size was used to grade ragweed reactions, different patterns were observed using codeine compared with histamine. These results have implications in utilizing codeine phosphate as a positive skin prick test control for allergy testing.     

Appraisal of the validity of histamine-induced wheal and flare to predict the clinical efficacy of antihistamines

Antihistaminic drugs have been used successfully for many years in the treatment of allergic diseases. Second-generation antihistamines have fewer sedating side effects than first-generation agents, and the number of newer drugs available for clinical use is growing. Various methods have been used to assess antihistaminic activity, the most popular of which is the epicutaneous histamine-induced wheal and flare. This test relies on the ability of epicutaneously injected histamine to bring about the wheal and flare, a neurovascular response that involves reflex vasodilation (flare) and local swelling caused by plasma extravasation (wheal). Antihistamines have been compared on the basis of their ability to block the histamine-induced wheal and flare in the skin. Results of these trials have been applied to predict the global antiallergic efficacy of various antihistamines. This review has examined the reliability of suppression of the histamine wheal and flare reaction in the skin to predict an antihistamine's clinical efficacy in two common allergic diseases, seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. Although histamine is one mediator in the allergic response in the skin and nasal mucosa, many other agents are important modulators of the allergic response. In addition, the major structural and functional differences that exist between the nasal mucosa and the skin affect the type of local response. These manifest themselves as differences between the responses to antigen and histamine challenge in the skin and the nose. The allergic responses in these tissues are not simply the consequence of one chemical but are the result of a cascade of interactions among various cells and mediators. The clinical manifestations of these complex interactions obviously cannot be fully replicated by injection of one chemical mediator, histamine, into the outer layer of the skin. Studies with antihistamines have shown that certain drugs, such as cetirizine, are more suppressive than others (loratadine, terfenadine) in controlling the histamine-induced wheal and flare reaction in the skin. When the clinical efficacy of these medications is compared in clinical trials in seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria, all are equally efficacious in controlling symptoms. Although the histamine-induced wheal and flare reaction can serve as a useful clinical pharmacologic test to assess dose-response relations for an antihistamine, its lack of correlation with clinical responses among antihistamines indicates that this model should not be used to predict or compare clinical efficacies of antihistamines in seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;99:S798-806.)     

Cutaneous and basophilic sensitivity to substance P and gastrin in non-atopic versus atopic subjects

We compared the Cutaneous reaction to intradermal injection of substance P, gastrin and histamine in asymptomatic atopic subjects with a history of hay fever and/or asthma versus non-atopk healthy volunteers. We also studied in these two groups the basophilic histamine release induced by substance P and gastrin with that obtained with anti-human IgE and Con A. Intradermal injection of substance P (3–300 pM) and gastrin (3–30 pM) caused a wheal and flare reaction which was comparable in both groups of subjects. Substance P 10⁻⁴M caused a mean basophilic histamine release of about 15% in atopic and non-atopic Subjects. Gastrin was not effective in this model. Anti-IgE and Con A-induced histamine release was significantly higher in atopic than in non-atopic volunteers.     

Skin responses to intradermal histamine and leukotrienes C4, D4, and E4 in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria and in normal subjects

Mast cell inflammatory mediators, such as histamine, and newly formed compounds, such as the leukotrienes, cause wheal and flare when they are injected intradermally into normal subjects and may therefore play a role in the formation of urticaria. The effects of intradermal injections (50 microliters) of six different concentrations of histamine (range, 3.3 x 10(-4) to 3.3 x 10(-9) mol/L) and the leukotrienes C4, D4, and E4 (range, 2 x 10(-4) to 2 x 10(-9) mol/L) have been compared in 10 normal subjects and in 10 patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Wheal-and-flare sizes were measured at timed intervals up to 4 hours, and area under the curve for each response over time was calculated. There were no significant differences in leukotriene-induced responses between groups. Maximum sizes of histamine-induced wheal and flare were similar in each group of subjects. There were, however, significant increases in mean areas under the response curve of histamine wheal and flare in the patients with urticaria (wheal, p less than 0.001; flare, p less than 0.001; analysis of variance). These findings demonstrate a prolongation of skin responses to histamine in patients with urticaria and suggest an impaired clearance of histamine (or other vasoactive agents released by histamine) from the skin of these patients.