The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance

The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis was implanted in 1190 patients (1201 operations, 1303 valves) between January 1975 and June 1986; most implants were before 1982. The mean age of the patients was 57.2 years (range 8 to 85 years). The early mortality was 7.6% (aortic valve replacement 5.1%, mitral valve replacement 8.8%, and multiple valve replacement 15.3%). Late mortality was 3.9% per patient-year (aortic valve replacement 3.6%, mitral valve replacement 4.2%, and multiple valve replacement 3.8%). The total cumulative follow-up period was 6737 years. Thromboembolism was 1.5% per patient-year (fatal 0.4% per patient-year) (minor 0.6%, major 0.9%); antithromboembolic therapy-related hemorrhage was 0.5% (fatal 0.1%); prosthetic valve endocarditis was 0.6% (fatal 0.2%); nonstructural dysfunction was 0.5% (fatal 0.2%); and structural valve deterioration and/or primary tissue failure was 1.5% per patient-year (fatal, 0.2% per patient-year). Thromboembolism and structural valve deterioration were the significant complications, structural valve deterioration occurring primarily between the sixth and 10th year of evaluation. The overall patient survival was 65.0% for aortic valve replacement and 54.8% for mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.05) at 10 years. The patients were classified as 92.9% New York Heart Association functional classes III and IV preoperatively and 92.3% classes I and II postoperatively. Freedom at 10 years from thromboembolism was 84.3% for aortic valve replacement and 76.5% for mitral valve replacement (p = 0.05); structural valve deterioration was 78.6% for aortic valve replacement and 71.6% for mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.05); reoperation was 74.4% for aortic valve replacement and 67.1% for mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.05). Freedom from all valve-related complications at 10 years was 58.9% for aortic valve replacement and 46.8% for mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.05); valve-related mortality was 89.5% for aortic valve replacement and 82.6% for mitral valve replacement (p = not significant); mortality and reoperation was 58.9% for aortic valve replacement and 46.8% for mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.05); mortality and residual morbidity (treatment failure) was 87.2% for aortic valve replacement and 75.1% for mitral valve replacement (p = not significant); mortality, residual morbidity, and reoperation were 66.3% for aortic valve replacement and 54.9% for mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.05). The standard Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis has provided satisfactory clinical performance and has afforded patients excellent quality of life.     

The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis. A new generation tissue valve with excellent intermediate clinical performance

The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis, an investigational valve, was implanted in 1167 patients (1174 operations, 1274 valves) between November 1981 and December 1985 (age range 13 to 85 years, mean 61 years). The early mortality rate was 7.2% (with concomitant procedures 10.9%, without 4.8%; with previous operation 10.5%, without 6.6%). The late mortality rate was 4.5% per patient-year (aortic valve replacement, 4.0%; mitral valve replacement, 4.8%; multiple valve replacement, 5.6%). Total cumulative follow-up was 2272.3 years. The prevalence of thromboembolism was 2.6% per patient-year (fatal 0.4% per patient-year, major 1.4%, minor 1.2%); hemorrhage related to antithromboembolic therapy, 0.7% (fatal 0.1%); prosthetic valve endocarditis, 0.4% (fatal 0.2%); periprosthetic leak, 0.4% (fatal 0%); structural valve deterioration (primary tissue failure/structural failure), 0.1% per patient-year; and clinical valve dysfunction, 0.4%. The reoperation rate was 0.8% per patient-year (thromboembolism, 0.1%; clinical valve dysfunction, 0.1%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 0.1%; periprosthetic leak, 0.4%; structural valve deterioration, 0.1%). Thromboembolism occurred throughout the observation period but with decreasing frequency, hemorrhage throughout the period in no predictable fashion, prosthetic valve endocarditis within 2 years, periprosthetic leak within 2 years, and structural valve deterioration occurred during the fourth year of assessment. The overall survival rate was 79.8% +/- 1.7% (4 years). Freedom (at 4 years) from thromboembolism was 92.2% +/- 1.2%; from structural valve deterioration, 98.8% +/- 0.8%; and from reoperation, 95.8% +/- 1.3%. Freedom from all complications (4 years) was 85.9% +/- 1.7%; from complication mortality, 98.4% +/- 0.4%; and from valve failure (mortality and reoperation), 94.3% +/- 1.3%. This investigational Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthetic valve has provided excellent clinical performance and remains our overall prosthesis of choice.     

Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis. Clinical experience and implantation characteristics

The investigational Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular valve was implanted in 592 patients from November, 1981, to February, 1984 (aortic valve replacement in 286, mitral valve replacement in 259, and multiple valve replacement in 47, for a total of 638 prostheses). A previous cardiac operation had been performed in 77 patients (13%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 202 patients (34.1%), including coronary artery bypass in 163 patients. The patient evaluation was 98.6% complete. The early mortality was 7.4% (44 patients) and the late mortality was 6.2% per patient-year (41 patients). The valve-related causes of late mortality were thromboembolism (five), anticoagulant-related hemorrhage (one), and prosthetic valve endocarditis (one). The overall patient survival, including operative death, was 85% at 2 years. The linearized occurrence rate for valve-related complications was 5.6% per patient-year (37 events)--thromboembolism 2.7% per patient-year (18) anticoagulant-related hemorrhage 1.2% (eight), prosthetic valve endocarditis 0.8% (five), and periprosthetic leak 0.9% per patient-year (six). There were no cases of primary tissue failure or structural failure. At 2 years, the freedom from valve-related complications was 86.9%, from valve-related mortality, 98.7%, and from valve-related mortality and reoperation, 97.7%. This valve is fixed in glutaraldehyde at low pressure and is designed to improve durability. It has provided a low incidence of valve-related complications without structural failure. The structural design of the prosthesis does not always conform to the anatomy of bicuspid aortic valves.     

Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly: clinical performance of biological prostheses

From 1975 to 1987, 1,127 elderly patients underwent 1,223 valve replacements with the Carpentier-Edwards standard or supraannular porcine bioprostheses in 1,147 operations. Of the total patient population seen during these years, 33.5% receiving a standard porcine bioprosthesis and 48.6% receiving a supraannular bioprosthesis were 65 years of age or older. Of this elderly patient population, 465 patients were between 65 and 69 years old; 618 patients, 70 and 79 years old; and 52 patients, 80 years old and older. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 635 patients, mitral valve replacement in 417 patients, tricuspid valve replacement in 2 patients, and multiple-valve replacement in 80 patients. The cumulative follow-up was 3,957 patient-years. Early mortality was 9.5%: 7.3% for the 65- to 69-year-old group, 10.7% for the 70- to 79-year-old group, and 15.4% for the group 80 years old and older. Late mortality was 5.5% per patient-year: 4.2% per patient-year for the 65- to 69-year-old group, 6.3% per patient-year for the 70- to 79-year-old group, and 14.1% per patient-year for the group 80 years old and older. Valve-related causes contributed to 7 early deaths and 33 late deaths. The overall patient survival, including operative deaths, was 70.7% +/- 1.6% at 5 years and 47.8% +/- 3.7% at 10 and 12 years. The freedom from all valve-related complications was 52.1% +/- 6.1% at 10 and 12 years. The overall rate of valve-related complications was 5.0% per patient-year (fatal complications, 1.13% per patient-year). The overall rate of thromboembolism was 2.3% per patient-year and the freedom from thromboembolism, 69.6% +/- 5.2% at 10 and 12 years. The freedom from structural valve deterioration was 80.8% +/- 8.1% at 10 and 12 years: 71.7% +/- 11.0% at 10 and 12 years for the 65- to 69-year-old group, 97.9% +/- 1.2% at 10 years for the 70- to 79-year-old group, and 100% at 12 years for the group 80 years old and older. At 10 and 12 years, the freedom from valve-related death was 83.7% +/- 4.3% and the freedom from reoperation, 73.3% +/- 8.6%. The freedom from valve-related death, residual morbidity from thromboembolism and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, and reoperation was 61.7% +/- 7.0% at 10 and 12 years. The clinical performance of porcine bioprostheses in the elderly patient population has been excellent. The early mortality increases in patients 70 years old or older.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement

Biologic tissue has been used successfully for cardiac valve substitutes since the introduction of glutaraldehyde preservation in 1969. Assessment of the clinical performance of prosthetic valves requires consideration of thromboembolism, anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, prosthetic valve endocarditis, periprosthetic leak and prosthesis failure. Two methods of assessment of valve performance, linearized occurrence rates and multiple decrement analysis of valve-related complications, are illustrated in evaluation of previous and new-generation Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. The standard valve has a valve-related complication rate of 2.9% per patient-year over 5 years, while the rate for the new-generation supra-annular prosthesis is 4.3% per patient-year in the 2-year interval. Thromboembolism has been 1.6% and 1.7% per patient-year, respectively, for the previous and new-generation prostheses. Primary tissue failure has occurred only in the standard prosthesis, 0.6% per patient-year. The freedom from all valve-related complications is 93.1% at 2 years and 87.5% at 6 years with the standard valve and 95.1% at 2 years with the new-generation prosthesis. Standardized assessment of prosthetic performance should provide physicians and surgeons with the knowledge to optimize patient management. The new-generation biologic prostheses with improved preservation should reduce calcification and fatigue lesions. Tissue valves have afforded patients an excellent quality of life with a low incidence of valve-related complications.     

Ten-year analysis of the Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve

Long-term performance characteristics of the Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve were determined by analyzing the follow-up of 514 patients undergoing operation between 1971 and 1981. Cumulative follow-up was 2,601 patient-years (average, 5.3 +/- 3.8 years); 53% (238/452) of hospital survivors have been followed more than 5 years. Valve-related complications expressed as both actuarial event-free percents (+/- standard error at 10 years) and first-event linearized determinations (percent per patient-year) occurred at the following rates: thromboembolism, 82 +/- 3 and 2.3 +/- 0.3, respectively; anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 60 +/- 4 and 5.6 +/- 0.5; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 94 +/- 2 and 0.8 +/- 0.2; valve thrombosis, 97 +/- 1 and 0.4 +/- 0.1; reoperation, 94 +/- 2 and 0.6 +/- 0.2; valve failure, 82 +/- 4 and 1.6 +/- 0.2; and composite valve-related morbidity and mortality, 46 +/- 4 and 8.8 +/- 0.2. Overall survival was 72 +/- 2% at 5 years and 55 +/- 3% at 10 years; valve-related complications accounted for 22% of the late deaths. Although no instance of structural valve failure could be identified, 25% of valve-related complications resulted from valve failure, of which 67% were fatal. By 10 years, 54% of patients had experienced at least one form of major valve-related complication, 16% of which proved fatal. The Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve has late valve-related complications similar to other existing mechanical prostheses that have been subjected to long-term analysis.     

Elderly valve replacement with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Comparison by composites of complications

AIM: The goal of aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery in the elderly (= or >75 years) is to extend survival and minimize valve-related morbidity, mortality and reoperation. As the elderly population lives longer, those with implanted valves are at risk of suffering valve related complications. We hypothesize that bioprostheses are appropriate for the elderly. METHODS: The follow-up evaluation of 966 patients with valves (AVR, 666; mitral valve replacements [MVR], 226; multiple valve replacements [MR], 74) implanted between 1975 and 1999 was examined. There were 879 bioprotheses (BP) and 87 mechanical prostheses (MP). The mean age was 78.9+/-3.3 years (range 75-94.6 years). Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in AVR in 51.7%, MVR in 50.4% and MR in 28.4%. Valve type, valve lesion, coronary artery bypass (previous/concomitant), age and gender were considered as independent predictors of composites and survival. The total follow-up was 3905 patient-years. RESULTS: Early mortality was for AVR 9.6% (64), MVR 15.0% (34) and MR 25.7% (19). The late mortality was for AVR 8.8%, MVR 10.4% and MR 8.8%/patient-year. The only independent predictor of survival and valve-related mortality, morbidity and reoperation was age for survival in those with AVR, hazard ratio 1.15 [CL 1.03-1.27] p=0.0094). The BP reoperative rate was 0.5%/patient-year (reoperation was fatal in 6/15) of total, MP reoperative rate was 0% [reasons for reoperation structural valve deterioration (4), non-structural dysfunction (6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (5), reoperation fatality due to non-structural dysfunction (2), prosthetic valve endocarditis (4)]. Overall patient survival at 10 and 15 years, respectively, was 30.5+/-2.4% and 3.6+/-2.2% irrespective of valve position and type. Overall actual and actuarial freedom from valve-related morbidity at 15 years was 96.8+/-0.9% and 93.7+/-2.3%, respectively. Actual and actuarial overall freedom from valve-related mortality at 15 years was 84.3+/-2.4% and 58.4+/-0.9%, respectively. Overall actual and actuarial freedom from valve related reoperation at 15 years was 95.8+/-1.6% and 74.8+/-16.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BP valves are further confirmed to be a good option for AVR in patients = or >75 years of age.     

Aortic valve selection in the elderly patient

To determine the influence of valve selection on valve-related morbidity and mortality and patient survival, comparative long-term performance characteristics of mechanical (N = 68) and bioprosthetic (N = 73) heart valves were analyzed for 141 patients more than 70 years old who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement between 1970 and 1985. Cumulative patient follow-up was 491 patient-years (average, 4.3 years per patient). Hospital mortality was 18% and 19% for patients with mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Survival at 5 years was 61 +/- 7% (+/- the standard error) and 67 +/- 10% for recipients of mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Male sex (p = 0.014) and urgency of operation (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Atrial fibrillation increased valve-related mortality (p = 0.01). No patient required reoperation or experienced structural valve failure. While anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was increased in recipients of mechanical valves (9.2 +/- 2.1%/patient-year) compared with recipients of bioprosthetic valves (2.3 +/- 1.1%/patient-year), it did not result in a death or lead to permanent disability. There was no difference in freedom from any valve-related complication at 5 years. However, when all morbid events are considered, recipients of bioprosthetic valves experienced fewer valve-related complications than patients receiving mechanical valves (10.7 +/- 2.3%/patient-year versus 17.6 +/- 2.5%/patient-year, respectively; p less than 0.05). The reduced incidence of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage and the infrequent need for warfarin sodium anticoagulation favor selection of a bioprosthetic heart valve in patients older than 70 years.     

The necessity of reoperation for patients with Bjork-Shiley, St Jude Medical, Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards prostheses

The purpose of this study was to determine the criteria of valve selection from the long-term results of Hancock, Carpentier-Edwards, St Jude Medical and Bjork-Shiley prostheses, taking into special account the frequency of reoperation. Reoperations on the Hancock bioprosthesis were performed on six patients for tissue leaflet disruption with an incidence of 2.2 per cent/patient-year. Reoperations on the Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis were performed on 24 patients for tissue leaflet disruption in 23 patients and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in one, with an incidence of 3.8 per cent/patient-year. Reoperations on the Bjork-Shiley prosthesis were performed in two patients for severe hemolysis, with an incidence of 0.32 per cent/patient-year. Reoperations on the St Jude Medical prosthesis were performed on 3 patients, for valve thrombosis in one patient, PVE in one, and hemolysis in one, with an incidence of 0.23 per cent/patient-year. The overall mortality rate was 20 per cent, or 7 patients, and the indications for reoperation affected this. Patients with primary tissue failure had a mortality rate of 10.3 per cent; those with a thrombosed valve, 0 per cent; those with hemolysis, 66.7 per cent; and those with valve infection, 100 per cent. A good chance of survival may be achieved in patients facing prosthetic valve complications by performing reoperation as soon as possible after early detection, since mortality is high following emergency reoperation and in patients with severe symptoms. Currently, we recommend mechanical prostheses for valve replacement except in patients over 70 years old and in younger patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulative therapy.     

The necessity of reoperation for patients with Bjork-Shiley,St Jude Medical,Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards prostheses

The purpose of this study was to determine the criteria of valve selection from the long-term results of Hancock, Carpentier-Edwards, St Jude Medical and Bjork-Shiley prostheses, taking into special account the frequency of reoperation. Reoperations on the Hancock bioprosthesis were performed on six patients for tissue leaflet disruption with an incidence of 2.2 per cent/patient-year. Reoperations on the Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis were performed on 24 patients for tissue leaflet disruption in 23 patients and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in one, with an incidence of 3.8 per cent/patient-year. Reoperations on the Bjork-Shiley prosthesis were performed in two patients for severe hemolysis, with an incidence of 0.32 per cent/patient-year. Reoperations on the St Jude Medical prosthesis were performed on 3 patients, for valve thrombosis in one patient, PVE in one, and hemolysis in one, with an incidence of 0.23 per cent/patient-year. The overall mortality rate was 20 per cent, or 7 patients, and the indications for reoperation affected this. Patients with primary tissue failure had a mortality rate of 10.3 per cent; those with a thrombosed valve, 0 per cent; those with hemolysis, 66.7 per cent; and those with valve infection, 100 per cent. A good chance of survival may be achieved in patients facing prosthetic valve complications by performing reoperation as soon as possible after early detection, since mortality is high following emergency reoperation and in patients with severe symptoms. Currently, we recommend mechanical prostheses for valve replacement except in patients over 70 years old and in younger patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulative therapy.     

Long-term results of porcine bioprosthetic heterograft; a 13-years' experience

One hundred and ninety-four patients underwent valve replacements with the glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine bioprostheses (133 Hancock valves, 39 Angell-Shiley valves, 22 Carpentier-Edwards valves and 3 other valves) from 1974 through 1979. There were 105 women and 89 men, whose age ranged 18 to 62 (mean 38.8) years. One hundred and eighty-two patients had mitral bioprosthetic valve replacement (BVR)s, of which 52 had combined aortic mechanical valve replacements, 8 had aortic BVR's, 3 had tricuspid BVR's and 3 had multi-BVR's. Operative mortality was 10.8%. Only one patient was lost to follow-up. Cumulative duration of follow-up is 1421 patient-years. Linearized rate of anticoagulant related hemorrhage, thromboembolism (TE), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), primary tissue failure (PTF) and valve dysfunction (VD) were 0.07, 1.62, 0.49, 2.74 and 3.66% per patient-year. Actuarial freedom from TE, PVE, PTF and VD were 87.0 +/- 2.7%, 95.6 +/- 1.5%, 65.2 +/- 4.9% and 56.9 +/- 5.6% at 13 years. Actuarial survival rate was 67.4 +/- 4.0% at 13 years. Long term follow-up after valve replacement with porcine bioprosthetic valve confirms low thrombogenicity. But primary tissue failure was the chief cause of valve dysfunction and represent a major problem. At this time, we are going to use porcine bioprosthetic valve in the selected patients, that is in the situations in which anticoagulation is contraindicated.     

Surgical strategy for severe tricuspid valve regurgitation complicated by advanced mitral valve disease: long-term outcome of tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation in eighty-eight cases

OBJECTIVE: Although annuloplasty has been the most commonly performed surgical modality for severe tricuspid regurgitation, tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation has been performed in our hospital for more than a decade. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation in a subgroup of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, those who also had advanced mitral valve disease. METHODS: Mitral valve replacement in conjunction with tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation was performed on 88 patients at our hospital between 1984 and 1998. The patients (mean age 57 +/- 11 years) were followed up for an average of 7.2 +/- 4.5 years after the operation (range 0-14 years); total follow-up was 643.1 patient-years. All patients except 2 (97.6%) were included in the follow-up. We evaluated the mortality, the cause of death, survival, the freedom from structural valve deterioration and reoperation, postoperative complications, and long-term echocardiographic findings. RESULTS: Overall survival at 14 years was 69% +/- 7.7%. Freedom from structural valve deterioration at 14 years was 100% and from reoperation, 88% +/- 9. 4%. There were no instances of pulmonary thromboembolism or of complications associated with fatal arrhythmias. Echocardiography showed little residual tricuspid regurgitation, no atrophic and stenotic change in the native tricuspid valve, and no thrombus formation between native valve and the implanted bioprosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure's simplicity, the good long-term durability of the bioprosthesis, and the absence of fatal arrhythmias and pulmonary thromboembolism indicate that tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation is a useful procedure for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation complicated by advanced mitral valve disease.     

Twenty years' experience with the Model 6120 Starr-Edwards valve in the mitral position

A total of 549 nonconsecutive patients underwent isolated mitral valve replacement with a Starr-Edwards valve prosthesis (Model 6120) at the University of Louvain (Belgium) from 1965 to 1985. Ninety-seven percent of the patients could be traced and only 17 patients were lost to follow-up. Cumulative follow-up totalled 3,130 patient-years. Actuarial and linearized statistical techniques were used to describe the survival and the incidence of valve-related complications (according to stringent criteria). Long-term overall survival rate including early deaths was 79% +/- 0.02% at 5 years, 65% +/- 0.03% at 10 years, and 54% +/- 0.04% at 19 years, with a linearized incidence of late deaths of 3.9% +/- 0.5% per patient-year. The incidence of late valve-related deaths was 1.25% per patient-year. Valve-related complications occurred at the following rates: thromboembolism 3.1% per patient-year, anticoagulant-related hemorrhage 1.08% per patient-year, endocarditis 0.26% per patient-year, reoperation and periprosthetic leak 0.45% per patient-year, and structural failure 0% per patient-year. All valve-related mortality and morbidity were calculated at 4.9% per patient-year and the rate of valve failure (deaths and reoperations) at 1.4% per patient-year. Among 376 survivors, 352 clinical functions could be obtained: 95% of patients belong to Class I or II of the New York Heart Association after operation versus 24% before operation. The study shows the structural durability of the Starr-Edwards mitral valve with a follow-up over 20 years. The Model 6120 valve may be considered a faithful standard.     

The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.

Between 1983 and 1987 the Mitroflow pericardial prosthesis was implanted in 354 patients, ranging in age from 14 to 94 years (mean 60.1 years). The early mortality was 5.7% and the late mortality 2.9% per patient-year. The total cumulative follow-up was 853 years (mean 2.4 years). Patient survival at 4 years for aortic valve replacement (AVR) was 81.5% and for mitral valve replacement (MVR) 74.8%. The overall rate of valve-related complications was 4.8% per patient-year (41 complications): thromboembolism, 15; hemorrhage related to antithromboembolic therapy, 1; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 15; nonstructural dysfunction, 3; and structural valve deterioration, 7. At 4 years the freedom from thromboembolism was 91.5% +/- 2.7% for AVR and 91.1% +/- 4.0% for MVR, from prosthetic valve endocarditis 93.5% +/- 2.3% for AVR and 94.0% +/- 2.9% for MVR, from structural valve deterioration 97.3% +/- 2.1% for AVR and 92.6% +/- 3.2% for MVR, from valve-related mortality 96.9% +/- 1.4% for AVR and 97.5% +/- 1.8% for MVR, and from reoperation 93.5% +/- 2.8% for AVR and 83.1% +/- 5.1% for MVR. The freedom from the composite of all valve-related complications at 4 years was 81.1% +/- 4.2% for AVR and 75.3% +/- 2.8% for MVR. The Mitroflow valve has provided satisfactory clinical performance at the 4-year evaluation. Structural valve deterioration is greater in the mitral position than in the aortic position. Long-term evaluation of the Mitroflow valve is necessary to determine the impact of structural valve deterioration on its clinical performance.     

Allografts for aortic valve or root replacement: insights from an 18-year single-center prospective follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: Whether allografts are the biological valve of choice for AVR in non-elderly patients remains a topic of debate. In this light we analyzed our ongoing prospective allograft AVR cohort and compared allograft durability with other biological aortic valve substitutes. METHODS: Between April 1987 and October 2005, 336 patients underwent 346 allograft AVRs (95 subcoronary, 251 root replacement). Patient and perioperative characteristics, cumulative survival, freedom from reoperation, and valve-related events were analyzed. Using microsimulation, for adult patients, age-matched actual freedom from allograft reoperation was compared to porcine and pericardial bioprostheses. RESULTS: Mean age was 45 years (range 1 month to 83 years); 72% were males. Etiology was mainly endocarditis 32% (active 22%), congenital 31%, degenerative 9%, and aneurysm/dissection 12%. Twenty-seven percent underwent prior cardiac surgery. Hospital mortality was 5.5% (N=19). During follow-up (mean 7.4 years, maximum 18.5 years, 98% complete), 54 patients died; there were 57 valve-related reoperations (3 early technical, 11 non-structural, 39 structural valve deterioration (SVD), 4 endocarditis), 5 cerebrovascular accidents, 1 fatal bleeding, 8 endocarditis. Twelve-year cumulative survival was 71% (SE 3), freedom from reoperation for SVD 77% (SE 4); younger patient age was associated with increased SVD rates. Actual risk of allograft reoperation was comparable to porcine and pericardial bioprostheses in a simulated age-matched population. CONCLUSIONS: The use of allografts for AVR is associated with low occurrence rates of most valve-related events, but over time the risk of SVD increases, comparable to stented xenografts. It remains in our institute the preferred valve substitute only for patients with active aortic root endocarditis and for patients in whom anticoagulation should be avoided.     

Failure of Hancock pericardial xenografts: is prophylactic bioprosthetic replacement justified?

The incidence of major valve-related complications was evaluated in a series of patients in whom the Hancock pericardial xenograft was used for aortic (AVR; n = 84), mitral (MVR; n = 17) and mitral-aortic (MAVR; n = 13) valve replacement. At 7 years actuarial survival is 66% +/- 8% after AVR, 64% +/- 13% after MVR, and 41% +/- 15% after MAVR, whereas actuarial freedom from valve-related death is 79% +/- 7% after AVR, 78% +/- 13% after MVR, and 81% +/- 12% after MAVR. Actuarial freedom from thromboemboli and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at 7 years is 93% +/- 4% and 98% +/- 2% after AVR and 83% +/- 10% and 88% +/- 11% after MVR; no such complications occurred after MAVR. Structural valve deterioration determined at reoperation, at autopsy, or by clinical investigation was observed in 34 patients with AVR (10.0 +/- 0.2%/patient-year), in 10 with MVR (10.6 +/- 3.3%/patient-year), and in 9 with MAVR (16.6 +/- 5.5%/patient-year). After AVR, 19 patients underwent reoperation and 2 died before reoperation; 4 patients with MVR underwent reoperation, and 7 patients with MAVR underwent reoperation and 1 died before reoperation. Seventy-eight percent of the current survivors (13 patients with AVR, 7 with MVR, and 1 with MAVR) have clinical evidence of valve failure. At 7 years actuarial freedom from structural deterioration of the Hancock pericardial xenograft is 25% +/- 7% after AVR, 29% +/- 14% after MVR, and 0% after MAVR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A single-center experience with 1,378 CarboMedics mechanical valve implants

BACKGROUND: The CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve was introduced in 1986. We first implanted it in March 1991. The purpose of this study was to analyze our clinical experience with this valve. METHODS: Between March 1991 and December 1997, 1,378 valves were implanted in 1,247 patients, 705 men (56.5%) and 542 (43.5%) women with a mean age of 62 +/- 11.9 years (+/- the standard deviation). Follow-up is 99% complete and totals 3,978 patient-years. RESULTS: The early mortality rate was 4.4% (55/1,247). The survival rates at 1 year and 5 years were 91.8% +/- 0.8% (+/- the standard error of mean) (n = 1,062) and 79.2% +/- 1.4% (n = 281), respectively. Freedom from valve-related complications (linearized rate, 4.9% per patient-year) at 1 year and 5 years was 90.6% +/- 0.8% (+/- the standard error of the mean) (n = 996) and 80.6% +/- 1.4% (n = 243), respectively. Linearized rates for various complications were as follows: bleeding events, 1.73% per patient-year; embolic events, 1.76% per patient-year; operated valvular endocarditis, 0.18% per patient-year; valve thrombosis, 0.10% per patient year; and nonstructural dysfunction, 1.21% per patient-year. Freedom from reoperation at 1 year and 5 years was 98.6% +/- 0.3% (+/- the standard error of the mean) (n = 1,070) and 97.7% +/- 0.5% (n = 285), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm results demonstrate that the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve exhibits a low incidence of valve-related complications.     

Fifteen-year clinical experience with the biocor porcine bioprostheses in the mitral position

BACKGROUND: Bioprosthetic valve use represents a crucial improvement in surgical treatment of mitral valve disease. The aim of this study is to determine the long-term durability of the Biocor porcine bioprosthetic mitral valve. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1989, a total of 158 Biocor porcine bioprosthetic valves were placed in the mitral position, and long-term results of these patients were investigated retrospectively in 1999. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 4.4% (7 patients). Total follow-up was 1,499 patient-years. Actuarial survival was 83.66% +/- 3% at 5 years, 77.78% +/- 3.36% at 13 years (1.8% patient-year). Multivariate analysis demonstrated younger age, duration of implantation, congestive heart failure, and functional class to be significant predictors of late mortality. Actuarial freedom from valve-related mortality was 98.58% +/- 1% at 15 years (0.13% patient-year). Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95.49% +/- 1.8% at 5 years, 70.2% +/- 4.12% at 10 years, and 64.82% +/- 5.34% at 13 years (2.6% patient-year). Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration-related reoperation was 98.43% +/- 1.1% at 5 years, 89.15% +/- 2.85% at 10 years, and 76.82% +/- 7.91% at 14 years. Multivariate analysis showed younger age and duration of implantation to be significant predictors of structural valve deterioration and its related reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: By studying a 15-year time period, it is seen that this new generation porcine bioprosthetic valve should be considered an alternative for mechanical valves in selected patients.     

Clinical and Hemodynamic Results with the Carpentier-Edwards Porcine Bioprosthesis

Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses were implanted in 605 patients, 509 of whom had a single valve replacement, and 96 of whom had a multiple valve replacement. There were 54 early deaths (8.9%) and 26 late deaths (4.3%). The five-year actuarial survival was 87% for aortic valve replacement, 83% for mitral valve replacement, and 81% for multiple valve replacement. Of the 525 survivors, all but 3 were followed for a total of 964 patient-years; 354 patients (68%) remained asymptomatic, and 95 patients (18%) were improved. The incidences of thromboembolism, endocarditis, and reoperation due to primary tissue failure of the bioprosthesis were 2.0, 1.3, and 0.1% per patient-year, respectively. The actuarial probability of being free of all valve-related complications was 93% after five years. Satisfactory hemodynamic performance of the bioprosthesis was demonstrated by postoperative studies done in 70 patients. Thus, the Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve provides good clinical improvement, with a low incidence of valve-related complications and tissue failure at five years postoperatively.     

Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative?

The controversy surrounding the choice of a prosthesis for valve replacement in the elderly patient prompted me to review the performance of mechanical (Medtronic Hall [Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.] and St. Jude Medical [St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.]) valves implanted in 213 patients 65 years and older (mean 70.4 years) from 1980 to 1985. There were 63 mitral, 131 aortic, and 19 double (aortic and mitral) valve replacements. Most patients undergoing aortic valve replacement had stenotic lesions, but half of the patients in the mitral valve replacement group had regurgitation with or without stenosis. Early mortality rates for mitral, aortic, and double valve replacement were 4.8%, 6.1%, and 21.1%, respectively (p less than 0.01). The mortality rate for patients 65 to 74 years old was 6.5% and that for those older than 75 years was 9.1%. The cumulative follow-up for the survivors was 850 patient-years. The late mortality rate was 8.1% per patient-year but was valve-related in only 1.3% per patient-year. Noncardiac causes accounted for 43.5% of the late deaths. The late mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who had regurgitant lesions than in those who had stenotic or mixed disease. It was also higher in the older patients (10.3% per patient-year) than in the younger group (7.6% per patient-year; p less than 0.05). Reoperation was required in only six patients (0.7% per patient-year). Thrombotic obstruction of the prosthesis and systemic thromboembolism occurred at linearized rates of 0.6% per patient-year and 2.5% per patient year, respectively, and significant anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at a rate of 0.6% per patient-year. With the exception of late mortality, the incidence of all late complications was similar to that of patients younger than 65 years operated on during the same period. Actuarially, global survival (58% +/- 4%) and freedom from reoperation (95% +/- 2%), from thrombotic obstruction (96% +/- 1%), from thromboembolism (92% +/- 2%), from all valve-related mortality and morbidity (82% +/- 3%), and from valve failure (93% +/- 2%) were also similar to those of the younger patients. Mechanical prostheses perform well in elderly patients. I could not confirm an increase in thromboembolic or hemorrhagic episodes, and the respective mortality and morbidity indexes were similar to those observed in younger patients.