Epidural analgesia for post-caesarean pain relief: a comparison between morphine and fentanyl

In 20 post-operative patients who had undergone caesarean section, morphine 2 mg or fentanyl 75 micrograms in 0.9% saline were given epidurally in a randomized study, to compare their effectiveness in providing post-operative pain relief and the incidence of untoward reaction. There was a faster onset of action (P less than 0.01) and the quality of pain relief was substantially better after epidural fentanyl (P less than 0.01). However, the duration of action was markedly longer after epidural morphine (P less than 0.01). There was a significantly greater incidence of urinary retention after morphine administration (P less than 0.05). It is suggested that fentanyl gives better relief of pain than morphine when given epidurally.     

Epidural diamorphine and the metabolic response to upper abdominal surgery

The effect of the administration of diamorphine 10 mg epidurally on the metabolic response to cholecystectomy was investigated and compared with a control group of patients given intravenous papaveretum. There were no significant differences in blood glucose, lactate and pyruvate, and plasma nonesterified fatty acid values between the epidural diamorphine group and the control group. Plasma cortisol concentrations were significantly lower in the epidural diamorphine group postoperatively and this was associated with a marked improvement in pain relief. We conclude that epidural opiates do not directly influence the metabolic response to surgery, but decrease the cortisol response postoperatively secondary to improved analgesia.     

Patient-controlled intranasal diamorphine for postoperative pain: an acceptability study

A patient acceptability study was conducted using patient-controlled intranasal diamorphine. Patients undergoing nonemergency orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery self-administered intranasal diamorphine for 24 h postoperatively. Pain, pain relief, sedation, respiratory rate, nausea and vomiting were assessed regularly. After 24 h, patients and their attending nurses completed a questionnaire assessing satisfaction and practical aspects of the technique. Satisfaction was reported as good or complete by 69% of patients and 69% of nurses. Pain relief was assessed as better than expected by 45% of patients and better than normal by 50% of nurses. Seventy-nine per cent of patients would be pleased to use patient-controlled intranasal diamorphine again and 89% of nurses would be happy for their patients to use it again. Sedation was uncommon and mild and there were no episodes of significant respiratory depression. Fifty-three per cent of patients reported no nausea and 74% did not vomit at any stage. There were seven withdrawals, four due to problems with the device and three due to therapeutic problems. The nasal spray may need modification to improve reliability. However, we found patient-controlled intranasal analgesia an effective technique, which was well tolerated by patients and nurses and was without unpleasant side-effects. Further work to determine how it performs compared with intramuscular or intravenous analgesia is now needed.     

Epidural midazolam with saline--optimal dose for postoperative pain]

Optimal dose of epidural midazolam with saline for postoperative pain relief was investigated. Forty three patients for upper abdominal surgery were divided into 5 groups. Each group had either 10 ml saline only (saline group), 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.025 mg.kg-1 (0.025 group), 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1 (0.05 group), 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.075 mg.kg-1 (0.075 group), or 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 (0.1 group) administered epidurally for complaint of postoperative pain. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and sedation score (SS) were monitored for 120 minutes, and the time interval for next analgesics (TNA) was checked. In each group, BP was unchanged compared with preinjection level. HR changes were less in 0.05 and 0.1 group than in others. RR changes were less in 0.025 and 0.05 group than in others. Optimal SSs were obtained in 0.025 and 0.05 groups. In 0.075 and 0.1 groups, many patients fell into complete sleep (not responded to verbal command). TNA was about 2 hours in 0.025 and 0.05 groups, over 6 hours in 0.075 and 0.1 groups. Complete sleep was the cause of long TNA in 0.075 and 0.1 groups. It was concluded that optimal dose of epidural midazolam with saline 10 ml was 0.05 mg.kg-1 for postoperative pain relief after upper abdominal surgery.     

A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural diamorphine, subcutaneous diamorphine and an epidural diamorphine/bupivacaine combination for postoperative pain

This randomized double blind study investigates the relative efficacies of controlled analgesia (PCA) regimens in three different patient groups: epidural diamorphine 2.5 mg followed by PCA bolus 1 mg with a 20-min lockout (Gp1), subcutaneous diamorphine 2.5 mg followed by PCA bolus with a 10-min lockout period (Gp2) and epidural diamorphine 2.5 mg in 4 mL of 0.125% (w/v) bupivacaine followed by a PCA bolus of 1 mg diamorphine in 4 mL 0.125% (w/v) bupivacaine with a 20-min lockout (Gp3). Patients were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48 h. Patients in Gp2 consumed significantly more diamorphine than those in Gp1 or Gp3 (P < 0.05), but their pain scores were higher only at 1, 2 and 3 h (P < 0.05) with respect to Gp3 and at 1 h with respect to Gp1. Fewer side effects (sedation, pruritis and nausea as assessed by anti-emetic requirements) occurred in Gp2 compared to Gp1 (P < 0.05). Fewer patients in Gp2 required catheterization than in Gp3 (P < 0.05). This study indicates that the use of PCA epidural diamorphine, either alone or in combination with bupivacaine, reduces the dose requirement for analgesia but offers little clinical advantage over subcutaneous PCA diamorphine.     

Epidural infusion of bupivacaine and diamorphine for postoperative analgesia

An audit of postoperative epidural analgesia in a District General Hospital is presented. Three hundred and forty-eight patients received epidural infusions of a bupivacaine and diamorphine mixture, and were managed on general surgical wards using a standard protocol of observations and instructions. Good analgesia was achieved in 339 (97%) patients. Respiratory depression, defined as a respiratory rate of eight breaths.min-1 or less, occurred in 22 (6%) patients, was of gradual onset, and was simply and successfully managed without morbidity. There were no respiratory arrests. Other complications, and the significance of catheter insertion level are discussed.     

Epidural midazolam with bupivacaine--optimal dose for postoperative pain relief]

Optimal dose of epidural midazolam with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief was investigated. Forty seven patients for upper abdominal surgery were divided into 5 groups. Each group had either 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml (control group), 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml + midazolam 0.025 mg.kg-1 (0.025 group), 0.05 mg.kg-1 (0.05 group), 0.075 mg.kg-1 (0.075 group), or 0.1 mg.kg-1 (0.1 group) administered epidurally for complaint of first postoperative pain. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and sedation score (SS) were monitored for 120 minutes, and the time interval for next analgesics (TNA) was checked. In each group, BP fell down 10 minutes after injection, HR was unchanged, and RR (except for 0.1 group) decreased, compared with the preinjection level. There was no difference between control group and others in BP, HR and RR. But 3 cases in 0.075 group and 4 cases in 0.1 group needed chin lift with a pillow under the shoulder for slight airway obstruction. The most optimal SS was obtained in 0.05 group. TNA was significantly longer in 0.025 and 0.05 groups than in the control group. It was concluded that the optimal dose of epidural midazolam with 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml was 0.05 mg.kg-1 for postoperative pain relief after an upper abdominal surgery.     

An effective dose of ketamine for eliminating pain during injection of propofol: A dose response study

Background and purpose

Ketamine can completely eliminate pain associated with propofol injection. However, the effective dose of ketamine to eliminate propofol injection pain has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to determine the effective dose of ketamine needed to eliminate pain in 50% and 95% of patients (ED50 and ED95, respectively) during propofol injections.

Methods

This study was conducted in a double-blinded fashion and included 50 patients scheduled for elective gynecological laparoscopy under general anesthesia. The initial dose of ketamine used in the first patient was 0.25 mg/kg. The dosing modifications were in increments or decrements of 0.025 mg/kg. Ketamine was administered 15 seconds before injecting propofol (2.5 mg/kg), which was injected at a rate of 1 mL/s. Patients were asked to rate their pain during propofol injection every 5 seconds using a 0–3 pain scale. The highest pain score was recorded. The ED50, ED95 and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined by probit analyses.

Results

The dose of ketamine ranged from 0.175 to 0.275 mg/kg. The ED50 and ED95 of ketamine for eliminating pain during propofol injection were 0.227 mg/kg and 0.283 mg/kg, respectively (95%CI: 0.211–0.243 mg/kg and 0.26–0.364 mg/kg, respectively).

Conclusion

Ketamine at an approximate dose of 0.3 mg/kg was effective in eliminating pain during propofol injection.     

Intrathecal diamorphine: a dose-response study.

A randomised double-blind study compared the dose-response relationship of intrathecal diamorphine (0, 0.25, 0.75, 1.5, and 2.5 mg) for postoperative pain relief, in 35 subjects who underwent total knee replacement surgery. Assessments commenced 2 h after the opioid injection and continued for 20 h. Pain, analgesic effect, supplementary analgesic requirements and adverse effects were noted. Intrathecal diamorphine was unable to delay the initial perception of discomfort. It was, however, capable of postponing the onset of severe pain requiring analgesic supplementation (control 5.25 h vs approximately 8 h: P less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in the quality of analgesia between the groups. Pruritus was the only undesirable feature unique to intrathecal diamorphine administration. Intrathecal diamorphine was safe and was not associated with clinically apparent respiratory depression. Its effects were inconsistent and its use was associated with irritating side effects. Possible explanations for the erratic behaviour of the diamorphine are discussed.     

A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 23 patients who had undergone Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of patientcontrolled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl compared with a single dose of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Group A (n = 11) received epidural fentanyl 100 μg intraoperatively, then self-administered a maximum of two epidural fentanyl boluses 50 μg (10 μg · ml^?1) with a lockout period of five minutes for a maximum of two doses per hour. Group B (n = 11) received a single bolus of epidural morphine 3 mg (0.5 mg · ml^?1) intraoperatively and received the same instructions as Group A but had their PCA devices filled with 0.9% NaCl. Patients were assessed up to 24 hr for pain, satisfaction with pain relief, nausea and pruritus using visual analogue scales (VAS). The treatments for inadequate analgesia, nausea and pruritus as well as time to first independent ambulation were recorded. The ventilatory response to carbon dioxide challenge was measured at four and eight hours. Pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and the use of supplemental analgesics were similar in both groups. The mean 24 hr dose of epidural fentanyl used by group A patients was 680 μg. Pruritus was less common in Group A patients at the 8 and 24 hr observation periods (P < 0.0125). Both groups experienced the same degree of nausea and clinically unimportant respiratory depression. We conclude that PCEA with fentanyl provides analgesia equal to a single dose of epidural morphine and may be suitable for patients who have experienced considerable pruritus after epidural morphine adminstration.     

Dose response study of subarachnoid diamorphine for analgesia after elective caesarean section

Subarachnoid diamorphine provides excellent analgesia after elective caesarean section but the optimum dose is still uncertain. We therefore investigated the effects of three regimens of subarachnoid diamorphine. Forty parturients were assigned to one of four groups. A control group received no diamorphine in their subarachnoid bupivacaine and three study groups received 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg or 0.3 mg diamorphine added to 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in a semi-blind randomised design study. All women received a 100 mg diclofenac suppository at the end of the caesarean section and were provided with morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) postoperatively. The patients were assessed for pain, morphine usage and side-effects at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after the subarachnoid injection. Postoperative visual analogue scores for pain and PCA morphine consumption were significantly lower, and mean time to first use of morphine was significantly longer in the 0.3 mg diamorphine group. The mean (SD) dose of PCA morphine used over 24 h was 39.4 (14.7), 25.6 (16.5), 21.6 (15.9) and 3.1 (3.6) mg, and mean time to first use of morphine was 1.6 (0.5), 3.0 (1.4), 3.4 (2.4) and 14.1 (9.4) h, in the 0, 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg and 0.3 mg groups respectively. Side-effects of pruritus, nausea and vomiting were dependent on the dose of spinal diamorphine but did not require treatment in any patients. We conclude that 0.3 mg subarachnoid diamorphine provides significantly better postoperative pain relief than the smaller doses with an acceptable increase in side-effects.     

Intrathecal diamorphine for analgesia after Caesarean sectionA dose finding study and assessment of side-effects

Eighty women undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% were randomly allocated to receive, in addition, intrathecal diamorphine 0.125, 0.25 or 0.375 mg or saline. Postoperative morphine requirements, measured using a patient-controlled analgesia system, were reduced in a dose-dependent manner by diamorphine. Pain scores were significantly lower at 2 and 6 h following the two larger doses of diamorphine. Less supplemental analgesia was required intra-operatively if intrathecal diamorphine had been given. The incidences of vomiting and pruritus were also dose-related. No respiratory rates of less than 14 breath.min⁻¹ were recorded and the incidence of oxygen saturation readings less than 95% and 90% did not differ between groups. There were no adverse neonatal effects. Intrathecal diamorphine in the present study was found to be safe in doses of up to 0.375 mg following Caesarean section. However, minor side-effects were frequently observed.