New method of inguinal hernia repair: a new solution

Background : A new technique to strengthen the posterior wall of the inguinal canal in all types of inguinal hernias is described. This method of repair is done without mesh and has been developed because mesh is not easily available in rural or remote parts of many countries. Methods : After excision of the sac, a strip of the external oblique aponeurosis (EOA) is partially separated from its medial leaf, keeping its continuity intact at either end. This undetached strip of EOA is sutured to the inguinal ligament below and the arch of muscle above, behind the cord, to form a new posterior wall. This strip is put under tension by muscular contraction and works as a shield to prevent recurrence so that the external oblique muscle gives additional strength to the weakened internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles. Results : A total of 400 patients have been operated on from 1983 to 1999 and follow up by physical examination was carried out. (Eighty patients have been followed up for more than 10 years.) The postoperative period was comfortable with a hospital stay of 2–3 days and a return to work within 1–2 weeks. Recurrence was seen in only one case and haematocoele in one case. Conclusion : These results are comparable with operations performed with mesh. This operation is simple to perform, does not require mesh or extensive dissection and has produced excellent results. Therefore it is a good alternative to mesh or other open or laparoscopic repairs.     

局麻腹膜前间隙修补术在老年腹股沟疝的治疗进展

腹股沟疝在老年患者中有较高的发病率,由于老年人常合并有循环系统、呼吸系统疾病,在手术术式、麻醉的选择时需要更加谨慎,更有针对性,需要实施个体化治疗。本文将回顾腹股沟疝手术的发展简史,探讨各种腹股沟疝手术的发展历程,并着重讲述局麻下腹膜前间隙疝修补术的各种代表术式在老年腹股沟疝的治疗研究进展。笔者所在科室近10年开展局麻下腹膜前间隙疝修补术已有五百多例,积累了较多的临床经验,现结合国内外文献报道及自身手术经验,对局麻腹膜前间隙修补术在老年腹股沟疝的治疗进展做一综述。     

腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片植入术治疗腹股沟疝

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片植入术(transabdominalpreperitonealpatchrepair,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的手术特点及疗效。方法回顾性分析1998年3月~2005年11月82例TAPP的临床资料。结果82例TAPP均获成功,无一例中转开腹手术。手术时间(57.5±16.7)min(34~126min)。手术后阴囊血肿1例,无其他并发症。术后不用镇痛剂。下床活动时间(1.8±0.5)d(1~3d),术后住院(6.6±0.8)d(3~9d)。随访时间>1年者58例,无一例复发。结论腹腔镜TAPP采用后入路途径,遵循疝修补无张力原则,复发率低,是诊治腹股沟疝的有效手段。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放式腹膜前间隙疝修补术的临床疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（transabdominalpreperitoneal,TAPP）及开放式腹膜前间隙疝修补术的治疗效果。 方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年8月,山西医科大学附属晋中第一人民医院102例腹沟股疝患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为试验组与对照组,每组51例。对照组采用开放式腹膜前间隙修补术治疗,试验组采用TAPP术修补质量。对2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间,以及术后复发、疼痛、血肿、感染等不良事件的发生情况进行比较。 结果试验组患者住院时间为（4.65±0.78）d,明显短于对照组的（6.08±2.23）d,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后随访4～18个月,试验组未见复发及术后血肿、感染,术后慢性疼痛2例、术后阴囊积液1例;对照组中复发3例、术后血肿5例、感染3例、慢性疼痛6例、术后阴囊积液7例;2组并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。2组患者在手术时间、术中出血量方面对比,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。 结论TAPP对于腹股沟疝的治疗效果优于开放式腹膜前间隙疝修补术,具有显著临床优势。     

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair versus anterior preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is still not the gold standard for repair although mesh implantation is unequivocally accepted as an integral part of any groin hernia repair. The aim of the study was to compare the results of anterior preperitoneal (APP) mesh repair with totally extra peritoneal (TEP) repair for inguinal hernias. The prospective study was conducted on 241 patients with 247 hernias (from January 2000 to June 2004). Anterior preperitoneal repair was done in 121 patients and 120 patients were subjected to TEP repair. Repair in both groups was done by using Prolene mesh of size 6×4 in. or 6×6 in. intraoperative and postoperative parameters and complications were recorded and the patients were followed up to 1 year post-surgery. For both unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernias, mean operative time was significantly more in patients of TEP repair as compared to APP repair (P<0.001) and significantly more patients had peritoneal tears in the TEP group (P<0.001). Patients undergoing TEP repair, however, had significantly less postoperative pain (P<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05) and return to work was significantly earlier is this group (P<0.01 and P<0.001). There was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups. Patients with inguinal hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair recover more rapidly, and have less incidence of postoperative pain. But it takes significantly more time to perform than APP repair and also the incidence of peritoneal tear is higher.     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein术在成人腹股沟嵌顿疝的疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）与Lichtenstein术在成人腹股沟嵌顿疝治疗中的临床应用比较。 方法回顾分析2014年1月至2019年1月,上海中医药大学附属普陀医院急诊收治并完成无张力疝修补手术病例共82例成人腹股沟嵌顿疝患者临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为2组。观察组38例,行TAPP术;对照组44例,行Lichtenstein术。将2组手术时间,术后住院时间,术后疼痛评分,术后血清肿,术后其他并发症（复发、术后感染、术后肠坏死、出血）,术后总费用等进行统计学分析。 结果2组在术后血清肿及其他并发症上比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;研究组手术时间及住院费用明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;研究组术后住院时间及术后疼痛评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论TAPP术较Lichtenstein术手术时间长,术后总费用相对高,但其具有创伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快、复发率低等特点。     

Transabdominal preperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized studies

Background

The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and totally extraperitoneal repair.

Methods

The electronic databases of Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, and a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was undertaken.

Results

Seven studies comprising 516 patients with 538 inguinal hernia defects were identified. A shorter recovery time (P = .02) was found for totally extraperitoneal repair in comparison with transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (weighted mean difference = −.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], −.71 to .07) although the length of hospitalization (P = .89) was similar in the 2 treatment arms (weighted mean difference = .01; 95% CI, −.13 to .15). Operative morbidity (P = .004) was higher for the preperitoneal approach (odds ratio = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.61). No differences were found with regard to the incidence of recurrence, long-term neuralgia, and operative time.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests similar operative results for endoscopic and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, with a trend toward higher morbidity for the preperitoneal approach. Randomized trials with a longer-term follow-up are needed in order to assess the effect of each approach on the prevention of recurrence.     

腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿影响的前瞻性研究

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿的影响。方法采用前瞻性研究方法。选取2017年10月至2019年3月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的128例男性原发性腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组,患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘,设为试验组;患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端游离于腹腔,设为对照组。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后血清肿、切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发情况。随访时间截至2019年6月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。结果筛选出符合条件的男性患者128例;平均年龄为61岁,年龄范围为47~74岁。128例患者中,试验组60例,对照组68例。(1)手术情况:试验组和对照组患者手术时间分别为(102±34)min和(97±30)min,住院费用分别为(12813±2390)元和(12125±2205)元,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.907,1.685,P>0.05)。(2)随访情况:128例患者均获得随访。试验组和对照组术后发生血清肿分别为8例和8例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.072,P>0.05)。试验组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为20 mL(4~31 mL),对照组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为43 mL(23~98 mL),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.013,P<0.05)。试验组和对照组发生血清肿患者术后3个月均无切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发。结论TAPP术中疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘和将残端游离于腹腔均能有效修补腹股沟斜疝。疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘可减少术后血清肿抽液量。     

Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundGeneral surgery is the fastest growing field in the adoption of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Here, we present the results of one institution’s experience in training surgical residents in robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs.MethodsData were prospectively collected on patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with residents. Data points included patient age, gender, complications, hernia difficulty, resident technical competency as measured by GEARS, Zwisch scores, operative time, and the number of robotic console cases reported by residents as primary surgeon.ResultsResidents who performed >30 robotic cases had significantly higher mean modified GEARS scores (p ≤ .002). Residents who completed 10 or fewer robotic cases achieved significantly lower mean modified GEARS and Zwisch scores than those who completed 11 or more (p < .001).ConclusionsResident competency and autonomy improve with increasing total robotic case load. Attending surgeons grant more autonomy to residents with higher competency scores.     

Preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: Laparoscopic and open approach

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of preperitoneal repair using laparoscopic (TEP) and open (OPM) approach in recurrent inguinal hernia. Methods: We performed a prospective controlled nonrandomized clinical study in 188 patients with 207 recurrent inguinal hernias over a period of 5 years. TEP repair was employed for 86 repairs, and OPM was used in 121 procedures. The main outcome measurements were: recurrence rate, operating time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: There were three recurrences (1.7%). Two in the OPM group (1.8%) and one (1.3%) in the TEP group [P=NS (not significant)]. The TEP procedure was faster than OPM for unilateral repair (40.8 vs 46.3 min) (P<0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the OPM group (23.9%) than the TEP group (13.9%) (P=NS). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the TEP group (1.2 vs 3.9 days) (P<0.001). Conclusions: Preperitoneal approach (open or laparoscopic) seems to be a good option in recurrent inguinal hernia when these procedures are done by experienced surgeons.     

开放式腹膜前间隙UHS疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术后并发症分析

［摘要］ 目的 对比开放腹膜前间隙超普装置（UHS）腹股沟疝修补术与开放Lichtenstein修补术的临床疗效。方法 选择2013年1月至2018年12月间213例分别采用UHS疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的腹股沟疝患者临床资料,入组条件为临床和随访资料完整,包括UHS疝修补术101例（UHS组）,Lichtenstein疝修补术112例（Lichtenstein组）;所有患者均完成为期1年随访,记录和比较两组的手术时间、平均住院时间、术后局部不适、疼痛、复发等临床资料,评价两种手术方式的疗效。结果 两组手术时间、术后平均住院时间方面,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,两组术后早期并发症如血肿、阴囊水肿、感染均没有统计学意义。UHS组在腹股沟区不适、慢性疼痛、缺血性睾丸炎明显少于Lichtenstein组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后随访1年,Lichtenstein组有5例复发,UHS组未发现复发患者。结论 本组病例数据显示,采用开放腹股沟疝修补术的术式中,超普装置（UHS）腹股沟疝修补术较Lichtenstein修补术的远期并发症少。     

单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外操作与开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术的对比研究

目的比较单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外操作与开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析我院2015年1月~2015年6月收治的50例男性单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,年龄18~63岁,中位年龄37岁,所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。患者术前均经超声及临床体格检查,确诊为腹股沟疝。21例行单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝无张力修补术,29例行开放无张力疝修补术治疗,比较两种术式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症、术后24小时及慢性疼痛(1月以上)、总住院费用等临床疗效。结果单孔腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、术后平均住院时间及术后24小时疼痛率显著低于开放组,差异有显著性(P0.05);而在总住院费用方面,开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术组显著低于SILS-TEP组,差异有显著性,有统计学意义(P0.05);而二者在慢性疼痛(1月以上)和术后并发症方面没有显著性差异(P0.05)。结论采用单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝无张力修补术的患者术后恢复较好,临床效果明显优于开放性无张力修补术。     

Local and general anesthesia in the laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair.

OBJECTIVE: The extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach (EXTRA) has been shown to be an effective and safe repair for primary (PIH), recurrent (RIH) and bilateral hernia (BIH). There is very little data examining the merits of laparoscopic repair for hernias under local anesthesia. In this' paper, we compare EXTRA performed under both general and local anesthesia. METHODS: This nonrandomized prospective study was performed selectively on a male population only. Patients with associated pulmonary disease and high risk for general surgery were selected. Patients with recurrence and previous abdominal operations were excluded to decrease confounding variables in the study. A Prolene mesh was used in all patients. RESULTS: Between May 1997 and September 1998, 92 male patients underwent the repair of 107 groin hernias using the EXTRA technique. The procedure was explained to them, and different anesthesia options were given. Fourteen of these repairs were performed under local anesthesia and 93 under general anesthesia. Of the 10 patients who underwent a repair under local anesthesia, there were 8 indirect, 5 direct and 1 pantaloon. The mean age was 53 years. In the group of general anesthesia, the types of hernias repaired were 45 indirect, 30 direct and 11 pantaloon. The mean age was 45 years. The mean follow-up was 15 months. Each patient was sent home the same day. Two peritoneal tears were recorded in the first group. The operative time was longer in the local group (47 +/- 11 vs 18 +/- 3). None of the patients required conversion to an open technique or change of anesthesia. No recurrences were found in either group. The average time of return to work and regular activity was 3.5 +/- 1 and 3 +/- 1 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no significant difference in recurrence and complication rates when the EXTRA is performed under local anesthesia as compared to general. Blunt dissection of the preperitoneal space does not trigger pain and does not require lidocaine injection. The most painful area is the peritoneal reflection over the cord structure. The laparoscopic repair under local anesthesia represents an advantage in the repair of the inguinal hernia, particularly in the population where general anesthesia is contraindicated.     

Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

Background: Controversy exists regarding whether it is necessary to secure the mesh prosthesis during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, or port-site hernia. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing stapled with nonstapled laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repairs in a series of 502 consecutive patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair at two institutions between January 1995 and March 1997. Results: In all, 263 nonstapled and 273 stapled repairs were performed in 502 patients. Patients were evaluated at a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 1–32 months) by independent surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recurrence (0 to 263 nonstapled, 3 to 273 stapled; chi-square p= 0.09). The overall recurrence rate was 0.6%. There was no significant difference in operative time, port-site hernia, chronic pain or neuralgia between the two groups. Conclusion: It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair, allowing a reduction in the size of the ports. Received: 28 July 1998/Accepted: 25 November 1998     

腹股沟疝腹膜前修补与网塞修补术式的对比研究

目的探讨腹股沟疝腹膜前修补与网塞修补术式的对比研究。 方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2018年1月，北京市房山区良乡医院接受开放腹股沟疝无张力修补术1 237例患者的临床资料，根据术式不同分为网塞组（703例）和腹膜前组（534例），分析比较2组患者术后感染、复发、慢性疼痛、异物感等不良事件的发生情况。 结果术后随访12～24个月，腹膜前修补在复发率、补片感染、术后慢性疼痛方面均优于网塞组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论腹膜前间隙腹股沟疝无张力修补术安全、有效、可行性强，术后并发症发生率低。     

腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术后应用芒硝外敷防治血清肿的临床研究

目的 探讨腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后应用芒硝外敷防治血清肿的的临床疗效。方法:选取安徽省亳州市中医院2021年8月—2022年3月普通外科收治的腹股沟疝拟行腹腔镜疝修补术患者120例,采用随机数字表法随机分试验组和对照组,每组各60例。两组均接受腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)。试验组术后即予以芒硝外敷,对照组予以沙袋压迫。比较两组患者术后血清肿发生情况以及其他手术指标。结果:两组患者在术后1 d VAS评分(4.15±1.15 vs 5.62±1.22),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。在术后1 d(10 vs 16)、3 d(7 vs 11)、7 d(2 vs 4)、30 d(1 vs 3)血清肿发生率、术后1 d(12 vs 20)、3 d(2 vs 5)、7 d(1 vs 3)阴囊肿胀发生率、住院时间(4.72±1.42 vs 5.22±1.38)、手术时间(108.20±46.41 vs 104.17±44.52)、术中出血量(5.83±0.94 vs 5.80±0.90)差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论:TAPP术后应用芒硝外敷可减轻术后疼痛,有助于降低术后血清肿的发生率,从而促进患者的快速康复, 具有简单、方便及价廉等优势,值得临床借鉴使用。     

���������޲������Ƹ��ɹ���4438������

目的总结1997年11月至2011年12月复旦大学附属华东医院开展开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术4438例的临床经验。方法根据各种不同类型的开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术,对4438例腹股沟疝采用相对应的不同补片进行手术治疗,对不同术式的手术时间、术后疼痛、疝复发、血肿、血清肿、慢性疼痛、生殖系统并发症等及其他相关并发症进行观察、总结及数据分析。结果无手术死亡病例。术后平均随访33.7个月,术后血肿18例(0.40%),血清肿45例(1.01%),切口感染或愈合不良16例(0.40%),缺血性睾丸炎3例(0.07%)。复发14例(0.32%),慢性疼痛7例(0.60%),异常勃起1例(0.02%);3例睾丸疼痛(0.07%)。结论开放式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝安全有效,不同术式的疗效及并发症发生率情况接近,开展技术早期需特别注意预防手术并发症,对不同的病例宜采用个体化治疗方案,以期达到最佳的治疗效果。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的疗效对比研究

【摘要】〓目的〓比较腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的优缺点。方法 对2012年5月~2013年5月中山市中医院240例成人腹股沟疝修补术进行回顾性分析,其中开放性疝修补术(开腹疝修补组)148例,腹腔镜疝修补术(腔镜疝修补组)92例。收集两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后复发、术后慢性疼痛、术后阴囊积液及术后感染的临床资料并进行比较。 结果 开腹疝修补组患者在平均手术时间、平均住院费用少于腔镜疝修补(P均<0.01);开腹疝修补组术后复发(3例)、术后慢性疼痛(11例)、术后阴囊积液(2例)及术后感染(1例)等总并发症高于腔镜疝修补组(P<0.05);两组的平均住院时间差异无统计学意义。结论 腔镜组腹股沟疝修补术具有较少的术后并发症,但在住院时间、住院费用方面没有优势。     

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients

BACKGROUND: This report reviews our experience with 3530 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repairs in 3017 patients (513 bilateral) over the 7-year period from May 1992 to July 1999. We have continually audited our practice and modified the techniques in response. METHODS: Unless contraindicated, laparoscopic TAPP repair is considered the procedure of choice at our institution for all reducible inguinal hernias. We initially stapled an 11 x 6 cm polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space but now place a 15 x 10 cm mesh in the preperitoneal space with sutured peritoneal closure. RESULTS: There have been a total of 22 recurrences, of which 17 were identified in the first 325 repairs (5%) using the 11 x 6 cm mesh. Five recurrences occurred in the later 3205 repairs (0.16%) (median follow up of 45 months). There was one 30-day death unrelated to the procedure. There have been seven conversions (four due to irreducibility, two due to extensive adhesions, one due to bleeding). Bladder perforations have occurred in seven cases, of which six were recognized immediately and treated laparoscopically without sequelae. There have been seven cases of small bowel obstruction from herniation through the peritoneal closure. Sutured repair of the peritoneum has reduced the incidence of this complication. Four patients had mesh infections, of whom three were treated conservatively. The incidence of postoperative seroma and hematoma was 8%. Median operation time remains at 40 min with a mean hospitalization of 0.9 nights. Sixty percent of TAPP hernia repairs are now performed on the Day Surgical Unit with a 3% admission rate. Median return to normal activities is 7 days. Forty percent of patients require no postoperative analgesia. These figures remain the same whether the hernia is primary, recurrent, unilateral, or bilateral. Consultants performed most operations early in the series, but latterly surgical trainees have performed the majority of these procedures under supervision. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair is technically difficult, but in the hands of a well-trained surgeon, it is safe and effective with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The low recurrence rate compares favorably to other tension-free mesh hernia repairs.     

成人腹股沟复发疝行腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙修补术疗效分析

目的探讨并分析腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙疝修补术（TAPP）治疗成人腹股沟复发疝的临床效果及手术技巧。 方法回顾性分析2016年5月至2019年4月于徐州市中心医院血甲疝微创外科行TAPP手术的52例复发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。统计并分析患者手术时间、住院时间及术后并发症发生情况等数据。 结果所有患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放。手术用时35～110 min,平均（61.7±13.8）min;术中出血量5～40 ml,平均（13.1±4.7）ml;术后住院时间为1～7 d,平均（2.5±0.9）d;术中误伤腹壁下血管者1例（1.9%）,经缝扎止血后好转。术后出现阴囊血清肿者5例（9.6%）,3例经保守治疗后治愈,2例经穿刺抽吸后治愈。阴囊及腹股沟区气肿者2例,自行吸收好转。尿潴留者3例（5.8%）,经留置导尿管2 d过渡后恢复自行排尿。术区异物感者2例（3.8%）,经口服神经营养及止痛药后好转。术后随访6～41个月,无再次复发、补片感染、持续性疼痛、肠梗阻等严重并发症发生。 结论TAPP治疗成人腹股沟复发疝具有疗效确切、安全性高、术后恢复好、复发率低的优势,但要求术者必须在熟练掌握腹腔镜技巧、腹股沟区解剖及复发疝的治疗要点的前提下,才能充分发挥TAPP的优势,取得临床最佳疗效。