Clinical significance of Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor test v 2.0 for quantifying a wide range of serum HCV-RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Recently, we evaluated the clinical significance of a new assay, the semi-automated Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor test v 2.0 (Roche, Cobas-HIGH-RANGE assay), for quantifying serum hepatitis C virus RNA throughout a wider range than the traditional assay, Amplicor GT HCV Monitor test v 2.0 (GT-ORIGINAL assay). We compared the results of the Cobas-HIGH-RANGE assay with results of the GT-ORIGINAL assay. This study was conducted on serum from 91 patients with chronic hepatitis C at the Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center. The percent coefficient of variation (CV) for the within-run and between-run reproducibility of the Cobas-HIGH-RANGE assay ranged from 0.7 to 2.3% and from 1.3 to 2.0%, respectively. The Cobas-HIGH-RANGE assay exhibited a linear range extending from 5 to 5000 KIU/ml. The values for all 17 samples determined as less than 0.5 KIU/ml by the GT-ORIGINAL assay were also determined as less than 5 KIU/ml by the Cobas-HIGH-RANGE assay. For the 48 samples with values of 0.5 to 850 KIU/ml determined by the GT-ORIGINAL assay, the values obtained by these two assay methods were significantly correlated (r2 = 0.9117, y = 1.0667x-0.0801, p < 0.001), but the values of HCV-RNA determined by the Cobas-HIGH-RANGE assay were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those determined by the GT-ORIGINAL assay. Consequently, these data indicate that the HIGH-RANGE assay is a useful alternative assay method for measurement of HCV-RNA instead of the ORIGINAL assay, and that the HIGH-RANGE assay could be a useful tool for monitoring the efficacy of antiviral treatment.     

Clinical application of the Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 and Amplicor HCV Monitor assays for quantifying serum hepatitis C virus RNA

AIM: To compare the performance characteristics and clinical application of two different technologies for quantifying serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels. METHODS: HCV RNA was quantified by Amplicor HCV Monitor assay (Amplicor) and Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 assay (bDNA-2) in 119 sera from 107 HCV infected patients. RESULTS: Both assays had similar sensitivity (79.4% for Amplicor; 86.0% for bDNA-2), acceptable coefficients of variation (5.3% in Amplicor; 2.6% in bDNA-2), and good linearity (r2 > or = 0.98). There was a positive correlation between quantification values of both methods (r = 0.683, p < 0.001). The Amplicor values were on an average 1.76 log lower than bDNA-2 results. Male subjects and HCV genotype 1b were significantly associated with higher viral load determined by Amplicor, but not with viral load measured by bDNA-2. In 70 chronic HCV infected patients treated with interferon alfa, mean (SD) pretreatment viral load in 27 complete responders (3.47 (0.84) logs for Amplicor, 5.63 (0.58) for bDNA-2) was significantly lower than in non-responders (4.43 (1.01) logs for Amplicor, 6.10 (0.67) logs for bDNA-2; p < 0.001). Cut off points of 3.9 logs for Amplicor and 5.8 logs for bDNA-2 were determined to be the best for predicting response to interferon alfa, giving acceptable sensitivity (70.4%, 74.1%), specificity (72.1%, 65.1%), and accuracy (71.4%, 68.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Amplicor and bDNA-2 assays are clinically useful methods for HCV RNA quantification and are reliable for predicting the outcome of treatment, despite differences in absolute quantification values and in the correlation between HCV genotypes and viral load.     

Fundamental evaluation of HCV core antigen method comparison with Cobas Amplicor HCV monitor v2.0 (high range method)

Quantitative measurement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been performed by PCR method. However, PCR method has problems such as a special instrument, a complicated manual skill and a high cost. Recently, simple and highly sensitive HCV core antigen (Ag) method has been developed. We performed fundamental evaluation of HCV core Ag method, and compared HCV core Ag method with HCV PCR high-range method. The intra-assay and inter-assay variation coefficients for HCV core Ag were calculated to be within the ranges of 1.0-11.3% and 0.8-9.3%, respectively. The test of dilution linearity revealed the unstableness in the vicinity of a cut-off level of 50 fmol/L. Based on the result of the high-range method; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement rate were 97.0%, 100%, 100%, 82.0%, and 96.5%, respectively. The correlation between the HCV core Ag method and the high-range method was r = 0.87. Cost per sample and time from sample preparation to final report for HCV core Ag were cheaper and shorter than those of HCV PCR method, respectively. We consider that the HCV core Ag method seems to be useful as the quantitative measurement of HCV with respect to rapidness, easiness and low cost.     

Upgraded Cobas Ampliprep-Cobas TaqMan version 2.0 HIV-1 RNA quantification assay versus first version: correction of underestimations

The large underestimations of HIV RNA quantification observed in 17 patients with the first version of Cobas TaqMan assay have been successfully corrected in the upgraded version 2.0. In comparison with the Abbott RealTime assay, the mean difference that was 1.18 log(10) copies/ml is now zero. The discrepancies have disappeared.     

Quantification of hepatitis C virus by TaqMan PCR: comparison with HCV Amplicor Monitor assay.

The quantitation of serum levels of hepatitis C virus RNA in chronic hepatitis C has been regarded as one of the most important indicators for the outcome of interferon therapy. A new method was used for quantitating the copy number of hepatitis C virus RNA using TaqMan polymerase chain reaction and for comparing the ability and usefulness of this assay with Amplicor Monitor assay in 138 patients. The detection range of hepatitis C virus RNA by TaqMan polymerase chain reaction was from 2 x 10(3) to 2 x 10(8) copies/ml. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detectable in 128 cases (92.8%) and undetectable in 10 cases (7.2%) by this method. The RNA levels measured by Amplicor Monitor assay correlated significantly with those measured by TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assay and the sensitivity of the two assays was almost equal. Thus, TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assay appears sufficiently sensitive for the evaluation of hepatitis C virus RNA and would be useful for the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus infection.     

Second generation of the automated Cobas Amplicor HCV assay improves sensitivity of hepatitis C virus RNA detection and yields results that are more clinically relevant

The first and second generations of the Cobas Amplicor HCV assay were compared among patients at risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The second-generation test was found to be of greater sensitivity and of good specificity among clinical specimens containing HCV RNA of different genotypes. Finally, this new test is shown to predict the outcome of interferon therapy better.     

Performance of the New Bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA in plasma and serum: conversion to international units and comparison with the Roche COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor, Version 2.0, assay

We have evaluated the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0. Assay (HCV 3.0 bDNA assay) (Bayer Diagnostics, Berkeley, Calif.), which is an improved signal amplification procedure for the HCV 2.0 bDNA assay for the quantitation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in serum or plasma of HCV-infected individuals. The HCV 3.0 bDNA assay has a linear dynamic range of 2.5 x 10(3) to 4.0 x 10(7) HCV RNA copies per ml (c/ml). The performance of the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay was evaluated using three different test panels. An overall specificity of 96.8% relative to the detection limit of the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay was found. The intra- and interrun reproducibilities for both the dilution panel and the NAP (AcroMetrix, Benicia, Calif.) panel were consistent with coefficients of variation of less than 9%. Quantitation with the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay was linear over the entire range of both panels (ranges of 4.4 x 10(3) to 3.5 x 10(6) c/ml and 5 x 10(3) to 2 x 10(6) IU/ml, respectively), with correlation coefficients of 0.999, slopes close to one, and intercepts close to zero. The regression equation indicated that 1 IU corresponded to about 4.8 copies of HCV RNA. A correlation coefficient of 0.941 was found for HCV RNA values (in international units per milliliter) obtained from the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay and the HCV Monitor version 2.0 assay (HCV Monitor 2.0 assay) (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, N.J.). Quantitative results obtained close to the lower limit of the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay might imply that its lower limit should be reconsidered and raised, if necessary. It appeared that quantitation values obtained from the HCV Monitor 2.0 assay of between 5 x 10(2) and 10(5) IU/ml were in general higher than those obtained from the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay, whereas values obtained from the HCV Monitor 2.0 assay were underestimated for samples with HCV RNA levels above 10(5) IU/ml.     

Evaluation of the new LCx HIV RNA quantitative assay: comparison with the Cobas Amplicor HIV Monitor assay

In the present study we evaluated the performance of the new LCx HIV RNA quantitative kit (Abbott Laboratories, Delkenheim, Germany) for the quantitative detection of HIV-1 RNA in human plasma in comparison to the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor assay (Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg, N.J.), including samples containing a variety of HIV-1 subtypes. LCx and Cobas were compared using archived EDTA plasma samples collected from HIV-infected patients. Considering the lower limit of the linear range of 50 copies/ml, the detection rate of the LCx was 139 out of 174 (79.9%) versus 131 out of 174 (75.3%) of the Cobas. Overall agreement was 95.4% (166/174) at a cut-off of 50 copies. LCx and Cobas results on clinical samples were found linearly associated (r2 = 0.900) and strongly correlated (r = 0.949). The mean viral load in the 174 frozen patient samples was 3.25 log10 copies/ml by LCx compared to 2.71 log10 copies/ml by Cobas. Considering only samples with a viral load > or =50 copies/ml, the average difference was -0.132 log copy/ml. Using a panel consisting of 9 plasma samples spiked with 9 different HIV-1 cultured isolates (A-H, and O) LCx detected the 9 subtypes with a high degree of precision, i.e., 9-33% coefficient of variation. As expected, the Cobas failed to detect the group O isolates. The results of the remaining samples showed a higher degree of variation (when testing four replicates of the subtype panel) than the LCx of 14.2-40.3%. Nevertheless, the results were comparable with the LCx data.     

Evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

We assessed the performance of a new assay (VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 [bDNA 3.0] assay [Bayer Diagnostics]) to quantitate HCV RNA levels and compared the results of the bDNA 3.0 assay to results of the Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA 2.0) assay. Samples used in this study included 211 serum specimens from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons from two sites (Bordeaux and Marseille, France) with different genotypes; 383 serum specimens from HCV antibody-negative, HCV RNA-negative persons; and serial dilutions of World Health Organization (WHO) HCV RNA standard at a titer of 100,000 IU/ml. The specificity of the bDNA 3.0 assay was 98.2%. A high correlation was observed between expected and observed values in all dilutions of WHO standard (r = 0.9982), in serial dilutions of pooled samples (r = 0.9996), and in diluted sera from different HCV genotypes (r = 0.9930 to 0.9995). The standard deviations (SD) for the within-run and between-run reproducibility of the bDNA 3.0 assay were 相似文献   

Comparative evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0, QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0, and COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 Assays for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

A comparison of quantitative results expressed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) international units per milliliter, obtained from the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA-3.0) assay, the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA-2.0) assay, and the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (HCM-2.0) test was performed. A total of 168 patient specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Microbiology Laboratory for HCV quantification or HCV genotyping were studied. Of the specimens tested, 97, 88, and 79% yielded quantitative results within the dynamic range of the bDNA-3.0, bDNA-2.0, and HCM-2.0 assays, respectively. Overall, there was substantial agreement between the results generated by all three assays. A total of 15 out of 29 (52%) of the specimens determined to contain viral loads of <31,746 IU/ml by the bDNA-3.0 assay were categorized as containing viral loads within the range of 31,746 to 500,000 IU/ml by the bDNA-2.0 assay. Although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the bDNA-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-2.0 assay was noted (P = 0.001). Likewise, although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-3.0 assay was noted (P < or = 0.001). The discrepancy between the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 results was more pronounced when viral loads were >500,000 IU/ml and resulted in statistically significant differences (P < or = 0.001) in determining whether viral loads were above or below 800,000 IU/ml of HCV RNA, the proposed threshold value for tailoring the duration of combination therapy. The expression of quantitative values in HCV international units per milliliter was a strength of both the bDNA-3.0 and HCM-2.0 assays.     

Effect of genotypes on the quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in clinical samples using the amplicor HCV monitor test and the quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 assay (bDNA)

The Amplicor HCV Monitor test and the Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA) assay are two commercially available assays for the quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in clinical samples. A direct comparison of the two assays was carried out using sera frozen previously from patients known to be chronically infected with HCV. Overall, 61 samples from 51 patients were tested simultaneously by the two methods: 67% (28/42) of the patients were infected by HCV genotype/serotype 1, 10 % (4/42) with type 2, and 24% (10/42) with type 3. When the absolute value from each assay was examined, the Quantiplex assay gave a consistently higher reading and the mean logarithmic difference between the two assays was 1.4 (1.0 in type 1, 2.0 in type 2, and 2.2 in type 3). When analyzed according to genotype, strong correlation was observed between the two assays for type 1 (r = 0.83, 95% CI 0.63–0.93, P < 0.01), but not for nontype 1 samples. Despite the difference in absolute level reported by the two assays, there was a consistent trend of change in HCV RNA concentration by both assays in patients whose consecutive samples were analyzed and the differences between the two assays in consecutive samples were within 0.4 log of each other. The results suggested that with samples containing genotype 1, the Amplicor assay was more sensitive than the Quantiplex assay by about one log. However, the sensitivities of the two assays with nontype 1 samples were much closer probably due to the failure of the Amplicor assay to quantify nontype 1 genotypes effectively. J. Med. Virol. 55:191–196, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Performance of the Abbott RealTime and Roche Cobas TaqMan hepatitis C virus (HCV) assays for quantification of HCV genotypes

We evaluated the Abbott RealTime (ART) and Roche Cobas TaqMan Hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load assays for quantification of HCV genotypes in patient specimens. The ART HCV assay was a more sensitive and precise tool for accurate HCV viral load quantification across the HCV genotypes tested, especially genotype 1b.     

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor, Version 2.0, International Unit assay and the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay

The COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor assay, version 2.0, which reports in international units per milliliter, was compared to the assay reported in copies per milliliter by analyzing dilution series and clinical plasma samples by both methods. In addition, the Amplicor international unit assay was compared to the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay. The dilution series ranged from <100 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml and consisted of 32 points, assayed in triplicate in each assay. Thirty clinical samples ranging from 1,000 to 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml were assayed in duplicate. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor HCV RNA international units-per-milliliter and copies-per-milliliter assays was calculated as follows: (Amplicor international units per milliliter) = 1.030(Amplicor copies per milliliter) - 0.392; R(2) = 0.981; n = 28; S(y/x) (standard error of the estimate) = 0.129. The linearity of the Amplicor international units-per-milliliter assay was as follows: observed = 0.886(expected) + 0.437; R(2) = 0.983; n = 30. The linearity of the Superquant assay was as follows: observed= 0.918 (expected) + 0.436; R(2) = 0.986; n = 32. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor and Superquant assays was calculated as follows: Superquant = 1.066(Amplicor) - 0.0197; R(2) = 0.908; S(y/x) = 0.308; n = 28. The Amplicor and Superquant assays were linear through the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml and approximately 300 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml, respectively. The narrow range of the Amplicor assay means that some samples will require dilution and retesting for accurate quantification above 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml. The Amplicor and Superquant assays agreed well within the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml (approximately 1,000 to approximately 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml). Overall, the Amplicor and Superquant assays agree well, and results obtained in one assay could be expected to compare well with results from the other when reported in copies per milliliter.     

Quantitation of HCV RNA with the microwell plate and COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor assays.

BACKGROUND: We performed the Roche Amplicor Monitor hepatitis C virus (HCV) v2.0 microwell plate (MWP) assay for 2 years prior to bringing a COBAS instrument into the lab. Before reporting any results from the automated COBAS Amplicor Monitor HCV v2.0, we compared quantitative data with results on the same specimens from the manual Amplicor Monitor HCV. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the COBAS Amplicor Monitor assay yielded quantitative results that were comparable with those given by the manual Amplicor Monitor HCV. STUDY DESIGN: We tested 145 specimens with both assays. Specimens were chosen on the basis of having fallen within the linear range of the first assay. RESULTS: The log(10) mean (+/-standard deviation) for all 145 specimens was 5.976 (+/-0.597) for the COBAS and 6.142 (+/-0.597) for the MWP assay. When plotted as 145 pairs of numbers (log MWP result vs. log COBAS result), the linear regression line was displaced slightly downward from the line of equivalence by 0.1 log at the lower end and by 0.2 log at the upper end indicating the COBAS result was somewhat lower than the MWP result across the full range of the assay. The mean of the difference of the manual method and the COBAS for all 145 specimens was 0.166 log(10). A subset of 45 specimens for which we had HCV genotype data was analyzed separately. This set of specimens (of which 33 were genotype 1) also showed excellent concordance between the automated and manual methods. The two trendlines, one for genotype 1 and the other for genotypes 2, 3 and 4, were superimposable and thus the quantitative results were apparently not influenced by the genotypes, although the numbers were small (six HCV genotype 2, five HCV genotype 3 and one HCV genotype 4). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the automated Roche COBAS Amplicor Monitor v2.0 yields results that are comparable with the manual Amplicor Monitor assay for HCV genotype 1 and possibly also for genotypes 2, 3 and 4.     

Performance of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan real-time PCR assay for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantification is used to establish the prognosis of chronic HBV-related liver disease, to identify those patients who need to be treated, and to monitor the virologic response and resistance to antiviral therapies. Real-time PCR-based assays are gradually replacing other technologies for routine quantification of HBV DNA in clinical practice. The goal of this study was to evaluate the intrinsic characteristics and clinical performance of the real-time PCR Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) platform for HBV DNA quantification. Specificity was satisfactory (95% confidence interval, 98.1 to 100%). Intra-assay coefficients of variation ranged from 0.22% to 2.68%, and interassay coefficients of variation ranged from 1.31% to 4.13%. Quantification was linear over the full dynamic range of quantification of the assay (1.7 to 8.0 log(10) IU/ml) and was not affected by dilution. The assay was accurate regardless of the HBV genotype. Samples containing HBV DNA levels above 4.5 log(10) IU/ml were slightly underestimated relative to another accurate assay based on branched-DNA technology, but this is unlikely to have noteworthy clinical implications. Thus, the CAP/CTM HBV DNA assay is sensitive, specific, and reproducible, and it accurately quantifies HBV DNA levels in patients chronically infected by HBV genotypes A to F. Samples with HBV DNA concentrations above the upper limit of quantification need to be diluted and then retested. Broad use of fully automated real-time PCR assays should improve the management of patients with chronic HBV infection.     

Comparative evaluation of the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test, the new Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test and the Versant HIV RNA 3.0 assays for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples.

BACKGROUND: There are several commercially available assays for the quantitation of HIV RNA. A new automated specimen preparation system, the Cobas AmpliPrep, was developed to automate this last part of the PCR. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: We compared the results obtained by the Roche Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test (MCA, manual sample preparation) with those by the Versant HIV-1 RNA 3.0 assay (bDNA). Secondly we compared the MCA with the new Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV Monitor Ultrasensitive Test (CAP/CA, automated specimen preparation) by investigating clinical patient samples and a panel of HIV-1 non-B subtypes. Furthermore, we assessed the assay throughput and workflow (especially hands-on time) for all three assays. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the 140 investigated patient samples gave concordant results in the bDNA and MCA assays. The MCA values were regularly higher than the bDNA values. One sample was detected only by the MCA within the linear range of quantification. In contrast, 38 samples with results <50 copies/ml in the MCA showed in the bDNA results between 51 and 1644 copies/ml (mean value 74 copies/ml); 21 of these specimens were shown to have detectable HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml in the MCA assay. The overall agreement between the MCA and the CAP/CA was 94.3% (551/584). The quantification results showed significant correlation, although the CAP/CA generated values slightly lower than those generated by the manual procedure. We found that the CAP/CA produced comparable results with the MCA test in a panel of HIV-1 non-B subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: All three assays showed comparable results. The bDNA provides a high sample throughput without the need of full automation. The new CAP/CA provides reliable test results with no HIV-subtype specific influence and releases time for other works in the laboratory; thus it is suitable for routine diagnostic PCR.