Platelet inhibition with tirofiban early during percutaneous coronary intervention: dosing revisited.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of the intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Differences in the degree of platelet inhibition achieved with these agents may account for the disparity in clinical efficacy noted in recently completed clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ex vivo platelet inhibition with tirofiban in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and who were referred for percutaneous coronary interventions. Twenty-five patients were studied. Ten patients received tirofiban 10 microg/kg bolus and 0.15 microg/kg infusion for 16 hr. Platelet inhibition was determined at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after tirofiban, by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), rapid platelet function assay (RPFA), and platelet works (PW). The average platelet inhibition using RPFA with PPACK, was 87% at 5 min, then decreased to a nadir of 72% at 30 min and recovered back to > 80% at 60 min and onward. Similar trends were noted with RPFA-citrate, PW, and LTA. Ca-chelating anticoagulants (EDTA and citrate) overestimated platelet inhibition at all time points. Dose adjustment was done by increasing the bolus (15 microg/kg) in five patients, increasing the maintenance dose (0.2 microg/kg/min) in five patients, and increasing both the bolus and the maintenance dose in another five patients. Platelet inhibition tested by all the above methods was consistently over 90% when both the bolus and maintenance doses were increased. No increased incidence of major bleeding was noted at this adjusted dose. The current dosing of tirofiban may be inadequate to achieve appropriate platelet inhibition during PCI in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and receiving tirofiban immediately before the procedure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Dose adjustment may be needed to maximize platelet inhibition early during PCI.     

Quantification of abciximab-induced platelet inhibition is assay dependent: a comparative study in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Background The best method for measuring the degree of platelet inhibition with glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonists during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the optimal degree of periprocedural inhibition is uncertain. Low molecular weight heparins have been reported to cause less platelet activation than unfractionated heparin. Therefore, compared with unfractionated heparin (UHF), a low molecular weight heparin could enhance measured platelet inhibition. In this study, we compared 3 methods of measuring platelet inhibition and investigated the effects of half doses of abciximab in combination with either UFH or the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin in patients undergoing PCI with planned abciximab administration. Methods Abciximab-induced platelet inhibition was measured serially by means of 3 assays: 1) GP IIb-IIIa receptor occupancy, 2) binding of the activated GP IIb—IIIa-specific monoclonal antibody PAC1, and 3) agglutination of platelets with fibrinogen-coated beads (RPFA). Forty patients were randomly allocated to receive either UFH (70 U/kg) or dalteparin (60 IU/kg), followed by a half dose of abciximab (0.125 mg/kg) administered twice at 10-minute intervals. Assays were obtained 10 minutes after each half dose of abciximab and 8 to 10 and 24 hours after abciximab administration. Results No differences between UFH and dalteparin were observed. At each time-point measured, the mean percent platelet inhibition as determined by means of the receptor occupancy assay and PAC1 binding assay was less than the degree of inhibition determined by means of the RPFA. Conclusions The results of targeted levels of platelet inhibition cannot be extrapolated between different clinical trials of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists unless the same assay is used. Dalteparin, compared with UFH, does not enhance platelet inhibition or receptor occupancy by abciximab, as demonstrated by means of 3 separate assays. (Am Heart J 2003;145:e6.)     

Antiplatelet effects of abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients undergoing coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide achieve comparable antiplatelet effects with coronary stenting. BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide differ in chemical structure, binding site and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing coronary stenting were randomly assigned to abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg body weight, infusion 10 microg per min for 12 h), tirofiban (bolus 10 microg/kg, infusion 0.15 microg/kg per min for 72 h) or eptifibatide (bolus 180 microg/kg, infusion 2 microg/kg per min for 72 h). We took serial blood samples to analyze platelet function by using flow cytometry, turbidimetric aggregometry and the rapid platelet-function assay (RPFA). RESULTS: As assessed by RPFA, platelet aggregation after 2 h of infusion was reduced to 5.9 +/- 7.8% (mean +/- SD) of baseline by abciximab, to 5.0 +/- 5.4% by tirofiban and to 7.8 +/- 7.1% by eptifibatide (p = 0.42). Turbidimetric aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate stimulation yielded similar results, whereas percent inhibition of platelet aggregation after thrombin receptor stimulation was 45.8 +/- 16.8% with abciximab, 51.3 +/- 17.6% with tirofiban and 52.9 +/- 14.8% with eptifibatide (p = 0.37). Tirofiban and eptifibatide maintained their level of platelet inhibition during infusion. Flow cytometry revealed that the reduction in the monocyte-platelet interaction by abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide was not significantly different (20.0 +/- 21.9%, 23.8 +/- 18.2% and 21.0 +/- 19.8%, respectively; p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, at currently recommended doses, achieved similar levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation and a similar reduction in the platelet-monocyte interaction.     

Use of ICHOR-platelet works to assess platelet function in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Platelet glycoprotein GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been recently approved for use in treating patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing PCI. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a new device, the ICHOR platelet works, to detect platelet inhibition in patients undergoing PCI and treated with abciximab or tirofiban. The study was conducted at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Thirty patients undergoing PCI and treated with abciximab (n = 10) or tirofiban (n = 20) are included. Blood samples were obtained before, at 30 min, at 4 hr, and at 12 hr after starting the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and 2 hr after discontinuation. Baseline studies revealed > 95% platelet aggregability in all patients after exposure to ADP (20 microM). After starting tirofiban, 82%, 83%, and 82% of platelets were inhibited at 30 min, 4 hr, and 12 hr. Platelet inhibition decreased to 43% 2 hr after discontinuation of tirofiban. Similarly, ICHOR platelet works detected 91%, 92%, and 85% platelet inhibition at 30 min, 4 hr, and 12 hr after starting abciximab, respectively. Platelet inhibition decreased to 73% 2 hr after discontinuation. The ICHOR platelet works is a promising, simple, and rapid bedside method that may have clinical utility in assessing platelet inhibition in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:346-351.     

Pharmacodynamic and clinical trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and potential relationship of results to dosing

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have become the standard of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and for those presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-ACS). Clinical effects of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in PCI and NSTE-ACS strongly correlate with potency, consistency, and durability of platelet aggregation inhibition. Under standardized conditions [light transmission aggregometry (LTA), 20 micromol adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as an agonist, and D-phenylalanyl-L-propyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone (PPACK) as an anticoagulant], we demand consistent platelet aggregation inhibition >80% during the time of PCI (initial balloon inflation), and during the entire duration of therapy in NSTE-ACS. The benefit of abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg plus infusion 10 microg/kg/min) correlates with >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation during the intervention (PCI) and immediately thereafter (<6 hours). The absence of a benefit with abciximab in NSTE-ACS is most likely due to <80% inhibition during the major part of the infusion period (>6 hours). Tirofiban does not achieve >80% inhibition at the time of PCI at a dose of 10 microg/kg bolus plus 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion, and at a dose of 0.4 lg/kg/min loading infusion for 30 minutes plus 0.1 microg/kg/min maintenance infusion, the target value is only reached after 18 h. Eptifibatide (double-bolus 180 microg/kg 10 min apart, followed immediately by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion) provided an instant, consistent, and durable antiplatelet effect for the entire duration of infusion, and a significant clinical benefit in both PCI (non-ACS patients) and medically managed NSTE-ACS patients.     

Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of platelet aggregation inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), treated with different antiplatelet agents and dosages. BACKGROUND: The extent of platelet aggregation inhibition is an independent predictor of major cardiac events after elective PCI. In STEMI patients undergoing PCI, routine dose of antiplatelet agents may be associated with less effective platelet aggregation inhibition. METHODS: Patients were treated with clopidogrel before angiography and randomized to abciximab, tirofiban, high-dose tirofiban, or no glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor; GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor bolus, followed by maintenance infusion, was administered after angiography, but before PCI. Platelet aggregation inhibition was assessed before angiography, immediately after PCI, and 1 and 6 h afterwards. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 112 patients. Platelet aggregation inhibition was variable for individuals and suboptimal for all agents, particularly in the periprocedural period. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. Angiographic parameters after PCI were not different between the groups. No relationship was found between the level of platelet aggregation and parameters of PCI success (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count and myocardial blush grade), after combining the data from all four groups studied. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet aggregation inhibition in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, treated with antiplatelet agents, is variable and suboptimal for all agents and dosages studied. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. However, no relationship of platelet aggregation inhibition and angiographic outcome was found in this patient cohort.     

Comparison of GP IIB/IIIA Inhibitors and Their Activity as Measured by Aggregometry, Flow Cytometry, Single Platelet Counting, and the Rapid Platelet Function Analyzer

Background: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have primarily been used short-term e.g., during PTCA. They failed to show clinical benefit during long-term therapy. One reason might be the absence of a method to monitor inhibitor activity. This study compared platelet aggregometry, the rapid platelet function analyzer (RPFA) test, single platelet counting, and flow cytometric determination of receptor occupancy to measure GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitor activity. Methods: Increasing doses of abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide were added to whole blood in vitro. Whole blood was used for the RPFA, for single platelet counting and flow cytometry. Platelet rich plasma was prepared for aggregometry. Results: The correlation between aggregometry and RPFA results was linear for abciximab and eptifibatide. Tirofiban was a stronger inhibitor with the RPFA (IC₅₀ 7.7[emsp4 ]nM) than with aggregometry (IC₅₀ 19.6[emsp4 ]nM). The single platelet counting technique showed that even supratherapeutic concentrations of all three inhibitors could not completely suppress microaggregation. Abciximab concentrations that were equipotent to tirofiban with aggregometry were less potent with regards to the inhibition of microaggregation. This difference was more pronounced with TRAP induced microaggregation than with ADP. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy test showed that occupancy was 95[emsp4 ]% with 5[emsp4 ]g/ml abciximab and almost 97[emsp4 ]% with 10[emsp4 ]g/ml. Tirofiban reached a maximum receptor occupancy of 56[emsp4 ]%, eptifibatide 64[emsp4 ]%. Conclusions: While aggregometry is time consuming the RPFA provides results fast and with little variability. There is still a discrepancy between aggregometry and RPFA results for tirofiban. The single platelet counting technique detects the inhibition of microaggregation the relevance of which for the clinical outcome is not known. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy assay is best suited for abciximab.     

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Update on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade in Endovascular Interventions

Platelet aggregation plays a central role in the ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although aspirin and heparin have been effective at decreasing adverse events in these settings, the perceived need for more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation has led to targeting of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor. Several agents have been developed; four: abciximab, tirofiban, eptifibatide, and lamifiban have been tested in clinical trials. Overall, the positive findings of these studies have supported the hypothesis that enhanced platelet blockade leads to improved clinical outcomes in the settings of PCI and ACS. In this article, an overview of the various GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors is presented. The clinical trials of these agents as adjunctive therapy for patients undergoing PCI and in treatment of acute myocardial infarction are reviewed. Practical considerations relating to clinical efficacy, drug safety, and economic issues are discussed.     

The Use of the Point of Care Helena ICHOR/Plateletworks® and the Accumetrics Ultegra® RPFA for Assessment of Platelet Function with GPIIb-IIIa Antagonists

Objective: To evaluate a newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/ Plateletworks®) and to compare the results obtained with those of traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA® system. Background: Anti-platelet therapy is standard of care for patients as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or for medical management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). Recent clinical trial results suggest that the three currently approved platelet GPIIb-IIIa receptor antagonists, eptifibatide, tirofiban and abciximab, may vary in extent of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) at the approved doses. Thus, pharmacodynamic evaluations of these agents to determine the extent of platelet function inhibition, especially during the periprocedural time of a cardiac intervention, are necessary. A rapid measurement method as a surrogate for LTA, the current gold standard, would be ideal in order to have the option for dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during an intervention. The Helena ICHOR/ Plateletworks® may be useful for point of care testing. Methods: Blood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks®, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra® with RPFA cartridges. Results: This study demonstrated that platelet inhibition measured by the ICHOR/Plateletworks® mirrored the level of IPA obtained with LTA. In contrast, the Ultegra® system had less correlation when compared to LTA at inhibition levels < 90%. Conclusions: Based on these data, the ICHOR/ Plateletworks® utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.Abbreviated Abstract A rapid platelet function measurement method as a surrogate for light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the current gold standard, is ideal in order to have the option for GPIIb-IIIa antagonist dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during a coronary intervention. A newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/Plateletworks® was evaluated and compared to the results obtained with traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA® system. Blood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks®, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra® with RPFA cartridges. Based on these data, the ICHOR/Plateletworks® utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.Supported in part by Helena Laboratories, Inc. and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center Vascular Biology Center of ExcellenceThis revised version was published online in May 2005 with a corrected cover date.     

Safety,inhibition of platelet aggregation and pharmacokinetics of Fab'2 fragments of the anti-glycoprotein IIb-IIIa monoclonal antibody FRaMon in high-risk coronary angioplasty

The purpose of the study was to evaluate safety, effects on platelet aggregation and pharmacokinetics of F(ab')(2) fragments of anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa murine monoclonal antibody FRaMon (F(ab')(2) FRaMon) upon its intravenous administration in patients undergoing high-risk coronary angioplasty. Patients were treated before angioplasty with F(ab')(2) FRaMon at 0.2 mg/kg (n = 17) and 0.25 mg/kg (n = 12) bolus or with abciximab at 0.25 mg/kg bolus + 12 h infusion at 0.125 microg/kg per min (n = 29). F(ab')(2) FRaMon at both doses decreased platelet aggregation induced by 20 microM ADP to <10, <20, <40 and <70% of the predrug level at 1, 12, 24 and 72 h after injection, respectively. No significant differences were observed between F(ab')(2) FRaMon and abciximab antiaggregatory effects. In none of the patients did F(ab')(2) FRaMon cause allergic reactions, major bleedings or deep thrombocytopenia. Antibodies against F(ab')(2) FRaMon were detected in one patient. Free F(ab')(2) FRaMon was cleared from plasma within 12 h, while platelet-bound preparation occupied >95, 70-80 and 40-50% of GP IIb-IIIa at 1 and 12-24 h and 3 days after injection, respectively. Thrombotic complications within the first month after angioplasty in groups treated with F(ab')(2) FRaMon and abciximab were observed in one and two patients, respectively. The data obtained have shown that F(ab')(2) FRaMon at bolus administration to patients undergoing coronary angioplasty caused no serious side effects and at comparative dosage inhibited platelet aggregation with the same efficacy as abciximab at bolus + infusion administration.     

Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

The Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay was used to measure the inhibition of platelet aggregation at baseline and 10 minutes and 8 hours after starting therapy in 114 patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the planned use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The abciximab-treated patients received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min infusion for 12 hours; the eptifibatide-treated patients received 2 boluses of 180 microg/kg administered 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2 microg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours; the tirofiban-treated patients received a 25 microg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion for 18 hours. Ten minutes after starting therapy, the mean level of platelet inhibition was 86 +/- 9% for abciximab, 92 +/- 6% for eptifibatide, and 95 +/- 5% for tirofiban (p <0.001); > or =95% platelet inhibition was achieved in 29% of the patients treated with abciximab, 44% of those receiving eptifibatide, and 68% of the those receiving tirofiban (p = 0.02). In conclusion, at the evaluated doses, tirofiban seemed to be the most effective drug in achieving "optimal" platelet inhibition very early after percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Efficiency in clinical research: assessment in vitro of potential anti-thrombotic drug interactions

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether testing in vitro of combinations of anti-thrombotic agents can identify potentially important interactions, we evaluated the combination of rNAPc2 with antagonists of platelet GP IIb-IIIa to identify potentially altered anticoagulant properties, antiplatelet effects, or both. METHODS: Blood was obtained from healthy subjects who were taking aspirin (325 mg/day). Selected concentrations of rNAPc2, enoxaparin, and GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors were added in vitro. Platelet function was assessed with the use of flow cytometry. RESULTS: No effect on clotting or platelet inhibition was apparent when abciximab was added to the combination of aspirin, enoxaparin, and rNAPc2 at concentrations up to 250 ng/ml. A modest (less than 10%, P <0.02) effect on the time to clot assessed with the activated clotting time was demonstrated when either eptifibatide or tirofiban was combined with aspirin and enoxaparin plus rNAPc2. rNAPc2 did not alter antiplatelet effects of eptifibatide. By contrast, a modest, approximately 10%, increase in the inhibition of fibrinogen binding (P <0.01) was seen when rNAPc2 was added to the combination of aspirin, enoxaparin, and tirofiban. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of an exaggerated effect on clotting and platelet function when GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors were combined with rNAPc2, aspirin, and enoxaparin suggests that no substantial increment in the incidence of bleeding would be observed when concentrations of rNAPc2 up to 250 ng/ml were to be used in clinical studies. More extensive use of testing in vitro in advance of large-scale clinical trials of anti-thrombotic agents and regimens is likely to enhance their design and implementation.     

Abciximab, ticlopidine, and concomitant abciximab-ticlopidine therapy: ex vivo platelet aggregation inhibition profiles in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND: We examined the ex vivo platelet aggregation profiles of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received either abciximab, ticlopidine, or both agents. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The trial was a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center, open-label study of 42 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who received the following regimens: group 1, abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus and 12-hour, 0.125 microg/kg per minute infusion); group 2, ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily for 14 consecutive days, initiated 12 to 18 hours before intervention); group 3, abciximab plus ticlopidine initiated 12 to 18 hours before procedure; and group 4, abciximab plus ticlopidine initiated 72 to 96 hours before procedure. Platelet aggregation measurements to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and a thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP, 8 micromol/L) were obtained before ticlopidine treatment, after initiation of ticlopidine, and immediately before abciximab treatment and intervention, then at several time periods after onset of abciximab treatment. Platelet surface abciximab levels were monitored by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Neither ticlopidine regimen resulted in appreciable platelet inhibition before intervention and before administration of abciximab. In the ticlopidine-only arm, suppression of platelet aggregation to the weakest stimuli (5 micromol/L ADP; 23% +/- 7.5%) was detected within 24 hours after intervention, with maximal inhibition to both 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP observed 7 days after intervention (48% +/- 7.9% and 18% +/- 8.7%, respectively). In contrast, ticlopidine marginally suppressed TRAP-mediated platelet activation at times when maximal effects on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation were evident. Neither ticlopidine regimen appreciably enhanced platelet inhibition during or shortly after cessation of abciximab treatment. For all 3 abciximab treatment arms, profound inhibition of ADP-induced (>80%) and TRAP-induced (>65%) platelet aggregation was observed 2 hours after treatment. In the abciximab-only arm, platelet aggregation responses gradually recovered, with the rate of response directly proportional to the strength of stimuli. However, in the ticlopidine plus abciximab arms, recovery of platelet aggregation at later times (7 and 14 days) reached a plateau and reflected the extent of inhibition observed in ticlopidine-treated patients. No difference in the clearance of surface-bound abciximab from circulating platelets was observed between the abciximab and abciximab plus ticlopidine arms. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant abciximab plus ticlopidine treatment yields a platelet inhibition profile that is a composite of the effects of the 2 agents. In the early stages of treatment, inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation was mediated primarily by abciximab; effects were more moderate and were predominately mediated by ticlopidine.     

The pharmacodynamics of parenteral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists are a unique class of antiplatelet agents introduced for the management of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those presenting with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction (MI), collectively recognized as acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Eptifibatide, abciximab, and tirofiban HCl are three GPIIb/IIIa antagonists approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration. Of the three agents, eptifibatide is approved for use in both PCI and NSTE ACS patient populations, whereas abciximab is indicated for patients undergoing PCI, and tirofiban is approved for patients with NSTE ACS. Dose selection for the initial trials using the three parenteral antagonists was based on in vitro and ex vivo pharmacodynamic assays conducted under different blood collection and platelet function assay conditions. Recent comparative pharmacodynamics studies, which used newly defined and standardized assay conditions, indicate that the platelet aggregation inhibition achieved with these dosing regimens is variable. Therefore, the differences in clinical efficacy as evidenced in the more recent clinical studies (e.g., Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet Receptor GPIIb/IIIa using Integrilin Therapy [ESPRIT], Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries IV Acute Coronary Syndromes [GUSTO-IV ACS], and Do Tirofiban HCl and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial [TARGET]) may be related to the variable antiplatelet effects of the approved dose regimens.     

Effects of Different Thrombolytic Treatment Regimen with Abciximab and Tirofiban on Platelet Aggregation and Platelet-Leukocyte Interactions: A Subgroup Analysis from the GUSTO V and FASTER Trials

Background: Due to considerably high rates of reocclusion under standard thrombolytic therapy GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been combined with thrombolytics to improve therapeutic outcomes. Potential reasons for arterial reocclusion may be increased platelet activation, interaction of platelets with other cell types such as leukocytes and inadequate drug dosing due to lack of ideal platelet monitoring. We compared combination therapy regimens consisting of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombolytics with respect to platelet inhibition and platelet-leukocyte interactions. Methods and results: From the GUSTO V trial (standard rPA vs. reduced dose rPA and abciximab) and the FASTER trial (standard TNK-tPA vs. reduced dose TNK-tPA and tirofiban) 15 patients were monitored by platelet aggregometry, rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) and flow cytometry (FC). rPA alone (n = 5) caused initial increases in platelet aggregation. However, platelet aggregation was significantly (p < 0.05) and sufficiently (>80%) inhibited by abciximab/rPA (n = 5) and tirofiban/TNK-tPA (n = 5). The platelet inhibitory effect of tirofiban/TNK-tPA was more pronounced compared to abciximab/rPA with a significant difference after 2 h (p < 0.05). Tirofiban/TNK-tPA and abciximab/rPA caused decreases in platelet-leukocyte aggregates as well as in binding of specific antibodies to the platelet vitronectin receptor and P-selectin (p < 0.05, respect.). No differences among the treatment groups were seen with respect to antibody binding to MAC-1 and CD154/CD40 ligand. Conclusions: Taken together, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors overcome the platelet activating effect of thrombolytics resulting in sufficient platelet inhibition. RPFA is a suitable monitoring tool to accurately assess platelet inhibition. Within the given combination treatment regimen tirofiban appears to be more effective compared to abciximab and to exert effects beyond the inhibition of GP IIb/IIIa.     

High Platelet Count in Platelet-Rich Plasma Reduces Measured Platelet Inhibition by Abciximab but not Tirofiban nor Eptifibatide Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonists

We evaluated the differential effect of platelet count in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the level of ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation provided by abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban as part of a randomized, comparative trial of these agents on platelet function in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelet count <350 K/µL in PRP reduced measured platelet inhibition by abciximab, but not eptifibatide nor tirofiban. This observation suggests the need for standardized, uniform platelet counts in PRP during future comparisons of the degree of platelet inhibition by these agents.     

Pharmacodynamic profile of short-term readministration of abciximab in healthy subjects

Objective The purpose of the study was to establish a rebolus regimen for abciximab that restores pharmacologic glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockade within a short time frame (up to 48 hours) after completion of an initial treatment. Methods and Results The study was a single-center, nonrandomized, open-label dose escalation trial in healthy volunteers (n = 30). Each subject received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus and a 0.125 μg/kg per minute infusion of abciximab, followed by incremental bolus doses of the agent at 15-minute intervals up to 48 hours (10 per group) after completion of the infusion, (maximal cumulative rebolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg). Pharmacodynamic measurements (GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade, turbidimetric and whole blood platelet aggregation with use of a rapid platelet function assay [RPFA]) were obtained at periodic intervals during and after administration of the abciximab bolus and infusion. At the time of the first rebolus, pharmacodynamic measurements were attained immediately before administration of each rebolus and 15 minutes after the last rebolus dose. In subjects who received reboluses 12 hours after infusion, a cumulative dose of 0.05 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of GP IIb/IIIa receptors and >80% inhibition of turbidimetric (5 and 20 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate) and RPFA aggregation in 10 of 10 subjects. At 24 hours after treatment, a cumulative abciximab bolus dose of 0.1 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of all 4 pharmacodynamic measurements in 10 of 10 subjects. At 48 hours after treatment, a cumulative bolus dose of 0.15 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of all 4 pharmacodynamic measurements in 10 of 10 subjects. Conclusions A fraction of the bolus of abciximab restored pharmacologic (>80%) GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade when readministered at various postinfusion time points. These observations suggest that in the setting where acute readministration of abciximab is required less than a full bolus dose of the agent is warranted. (Am Heart J 2002;143:87-94.)     

Quantification by flow cytometry of the efficacy of and interindividual variation of platelet inhibition induced by treatment with tirofiban and abciximab

BACKGROUND: After exposure of platelets to abciximab and tirofiban in vitro, we have observed variable inhibition of fibrinogen binding and a lack of inhibition of alpha-granule degranulation. DESIGN: To determine whether such changes occur with treatment, platelet reactivity was assayed in blood from 50 patients receiving abciximab or tirofiban. METHODS: Platelet reactivity was determined before and during steady-state infusions of abciximab (0.125 microg/kg/min) or tirofiban, with either the PRISM-PLUS dosage (0.1 microg/kg/min) or the RESTORE dosage (0.15 microg/kg/min). Fibrinogen binding and P-selectin expression were determined by flow cytometry after stimulation of platelets with ADP (0.2 or 1 microM) or thrombin-receptor agonist peptide (TRAP, 25 microM). RESULTS: Both dosages of tirofiban and abciximab reduced fibrinogen binding in response to 0.2 microM ADP comparably. However, fibrinogen binding in response to 1.0 microM ADP or 25 microM TRAP was inhibited to a greater extent by the RESTORE dosage of tirofiban and abciximab than by the PRISM-PLUS dosage of tirofiban (P< 0.05). Furthermore, only the RESTORE dosage of tirofiban and abciximab reduced P-selectin expression in response to ADP. Inhibition with each regimen varied markedly between patients. CONCLUSIONS: The RESTORE dosages of tirofiban and abciximab each inhibit fibrinogen binding and alpha-granule degranulation similarly. However, substantial interindividual variation in inhibition of fibrinogen binding is evident.     

Abciximab or Eptifibatide in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: In-Hospital Outcomes and Costs and Six-Month Results

Inhibition of platelet aggregation with glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptor blockers has been shown to reduce ischemic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in multiple placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials. The effect of pharmacologic and cost differences between abciximab and eptifibatide, the only GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors indicated for PCI, on clinical outcomes and total hospital costs for patients undergoing PCI remain to be defined. To determine the rate of clinical events and costs associated with the use of abciximab vs eptifibatide at our centers, we retrospectively reviewed data for the cohort of 188 consecutive patients who underwent PCI and were treated with either abciximab (n = 85) or eptifibatide (n = 103) in the period between January 1998 and June 1999. The choice of a GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor was based on the preference of the interventional cardiologist. In-hospital events evaluated included death, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and hematoma. Additionally, the duration of hospital stay and total in-hospital costs were also assessed. Clinical events at 6 months included combined incidence of death, acute myocardial infarction (MI), or unstable angina (UA), as well as the incidence of hospital readmissions. In-hospital complications were generally more common with abciximab (death: 4.7% vs 0% with eptifibatide; major bleeding: 7.1% vs 4.8%, respectively; minor bleeding: 9.4% vs 5.7%, respectively; hematoma: 21.2% vs 21.4%, respectively), although none of these differences reached statistical significance. However, abciximab therapy was associated with a significantly longer mean duration of hospitalization (4.17 ± 0.48 days vs 2.85 ± 0.26 days with eptifibatide; P = 0.017) and a significantly higher mean total in-hospital costs ($31,396 ± 2,111 vs $25, 135 ± 815; P = 0.007). At six-month follow-up, the combined incidence of death, acute MI, or UA was also significantly higher in the abciximab group (32.9% vs 15.5%; P = 0.01). Additionally, hospital readmissions related to acute coronary syndromes at 6 months occurred significantly more often in the abciximab group (36.7% vs 16.5% with eptifibatide; P = 0.014). Our retrospective analysis of 188 patients undergoing PCI indicates that the use of eptifibatide instead of abciximab is associated with significantly lower in-hospital costs, significantly shorter duration of index hospitalization, and significantly reduced rates of ischemic complications and cardiovascular readmissions at 6-month follow-up. These differences were seen despite the fact that the baseline characteristics of patients in the two groups were generally similar. Therefore, eptifibatide provides a clinically effective and economically more attractive alternative to abciximab.