Domino liver transplantation in living donors

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) has been developed as a method to expand the donor pool. In living donors DLT, the prime concern is to avoid any disadvantage to the donor and the first recipient. Seven DLTs were performed among 211 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation. The domino recipients included six with hepatocellular carcinoma and one with citrullinemia. The domino grafts were obtained from patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) including the left liver in three cases and the right liver in four. Among the seven domino recipients, a 64-year-old woman with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma died of lung metastasis. The other six domino recipients are alive without FAP symptoms. In living donor liver transplantation, because the vessels of the graft from the first donor are not long enough for anastomosis, the hepatic vessels must be left as long as possible when removing the liver from the FAP patients in order to ensure sufficient safety for vascular reconstruction. With careful decision making during the procedure, such as where to divide the vessels in the FAP patients, DLT may help address the shortage of liver grafts.     

Domino liver transplantation: how far can we push the paradigm?

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) has emerged as a strategy for increasing the number of liver grafts available: morphologically normal livers from donors with metabolic diseases can be used for select recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (usually outside the Milan criteria). Familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) is the most common indication for DLT. When FAP patients are involved in DLT, the indications and outcomes are clear and good, although de novo FAP development within various periods of time has been described in DLT recipients of FAP livers. With the increasing need for organs, livers explanted from patients with rare metabolic diseases, such as primary hyperoxaluria (PH), acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), maple syrup urine disease (MSUD), and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFHC), are being used for DLT. However, insufficient data about the use of livers from patients with these rare metabolic diseases are available. In this review, we focus on the latter disorders. PH is not a good indication for DLT because recipients of PH livers develop hyperoxaluria and early acute renal failure. AIP also seems to be a debatable indication for DLT because of the rapid development of neurotoxicity in AIP liver recipients. However, the outcomes of DLT with HFHC and MSUD liver grafts (which include the risk of the de novo development of these genetic diseases) are promising. For rare metabolic liver diseases to be established as indications for DLT, more reports and studies are needed.     

Sequential (domino) transplantation of the liver in a transthyretin-50 familial amyloid polyneuropathy

Background: General shortage of cadaveric organs has led to a search for alternative methods to expand the donor pool. Sequential (domino) transplantation is yet another attempt to compensate for the declining consent to organ donation. Patients and methods: To qualify for a domino liver transplantation, the following preconditions must be fulfilled: (1) extrahepatic disease must exist, (2) liver must be fully functional, and (3) the genetic defect in the host should recur within a sufficient latency period. Familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease which involves a genetic defect for transthyretin (TTR), which is predominantly produced in the liver. Results: In this report, we describe a rare case of a FAP TTR-50 variant undergoing domino liver transplantation. Since myocardial symptoms precede peripheral polyneuropathy, special emphasis should be placed on arrhythmias and the restrictive cardiomyopathy necessitating a veno-venous bypass or a cardiac pacemaker in order to improve cardiac contractility. The type of anastomosis of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava and possible alternatives are discussed. Conclusion: Despite ethical problems, the advantages of the domino procedure are obvious: (1) expansion of the donor pool, (2) ability to use living donors, and (3) presence of very short ischemic time and thus excellent liver function. Due to the kinetics of TTR production and deposition, donors and recipients of FAP livers should be followed up using an extensive neurological and cardiological protocol. Received: 15 June 1999 Accepted: 12 November 1999     

A different amyloid formation mechanism: de novo oculoleptomeningeal amyloid deposits after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has served as a treatment for patients with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) because variant transthyretin (TTR), the pathogenic protein of FAP, is predominantly produced by the liver. However, the effect on amyloid formation of TTR that is synthesised by the retina and the choroid plexus remains to be elucidated in FAP patients with liver transplants. OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in ocular tissues and the central nervous system (CNS) of FAP patients after liver transplantation. DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan. INTERVENTION: Transplantation of livers from cadaveric or living donors. MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative measures and postoperative (16-108 months) follow-up of clinical data, including routine ophthalmologic, neurologic, and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: In 22 patients with FAP related to the amyloidogenic TTR (ATTR) Val30Met and 3 patients with FAP ATTR Tyr114Cys, after liver transplantation, 3 patients began to show evidence of de novo glaucoma, and 1 had vitreous opacity that was caused by the variant TTR. Another three patients showed new amyloid deposits in the pupillary margin, which could lead to glaucoma and vitreous opacity. As for changes in the CNS and levels of total protein and TTR in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), after liver transplantation, two FAP ATTR Tyr114Cys patients exhibited de novo amyloid deposition in the leptomeninges, and total protein and TTR levels in CSF were significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Oculoleptomeningeal involvement in FAP was not prevented by liver transplantation because variant TTR produced by the retina and the choroid plexus forms amyloid fibrils in situ.     

Whole-Liver Graft Without the Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava for Sequential (Domino) Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Grafts used in Domino liver transplantation (LT) obtained from living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) patients have been mainly used as reduced grafts. Because of small-for-size problems seen in LDLT, using whole liver grafts could improve post-LT outcome. Eight consecutive Domino LDLT using whole livers without retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) from FAP patients were retrospectively analyzed. The graft weight/recipient's body weight ratio (GWRW) in the domino recipients ranged from 1.28% to 2.4% (mean: 1.52). Multiple vascular reconstructions in the whole-liver domino LT resulted in longer than usual warm ischemia time (mean: 64 min); however immediate post-operative recovery of hepatic function was uneventful. At 8-40 months after the transplant, all the FAP patients are well and all of the domino recipients are alive. Domino LT using a whole FAP liver from a LDLT for a FAP patient presents satisfactory results, even though the transplant procedure is technically complicated.     

Domino liver transplantation: risks and benefits

Domino liver transplantation, wherein a patient who himself undergoes liver transplantation in turn donates his liver to another recipient, has been performed since the mid-1990 s. Although livers from a handful of metabolic disorders cured by liver transplantation have been used for domino transplantation, familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) livers are by far the most common source. FAP is an inherited disorder never presenting its clinical manifestation before the age of 15. In many carriers, the genetic disorder never manifests during lifetime. Thus, only a proportion of patients with FAP develop disease symptoms, which has been the rationale for using such livers for other patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. According to the Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy World Transplant Registry (FAPWTR), only 2 out of more than 500 patients so far have developed symptoms after domino liver transplantation using an FAP liver. Domino recipients with nonmalignant indications for liver transplantation show excellent long-term survivals. With careful selection of recipients, the procedure helps to reduce the organ shortage and the time on the waiting list for patients with malignant disorders.     

Domino liver transplants for metabolic disorders: experience with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy

Background: Shortage of liver donors means that new methods of liver procurement must be explored. In domino transplantation, organs explanted during transplantation in one patient are transplanted into a second patient. Domino procedures can be performed with livers from patients having transplantion for hepatic metabolic disorders that cause systemic disease without affecting other liver functions. Familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) type I is one of these.

Study Design: We reviewed the Paul Brousse experience with a domino liver transplant program for FAP, hoping to extend the approach to other metabolic disorders.

Results: Livers from 10 patients transplanted for FAP type 1 were used for domino transplants to patients with unresectable primary or metastatic liver cancers. There was no perioperative mortality. Neuropathy or cardiomyopathy did not increase the morbidity of the domino liver explant and transplant procedures. Morbidity for the domino recipients did not appear to be increased. Variant transthyretin was detected in the serum in FAP liver recipients, with no immediate clinical consequences.

Conclusions: The domino approach is feasible and requires careful planning of the surgical procedures for liver explantation, particularly for the nature and site of vascular anastomoses. Domino transplantation of metabolically dysfunctional livers creates new categories of potential donors and potential recipients. It raises new ethical, technical, and societal issues. The domino approach could be used in several genetic or biochemical disorders now treated by liver transplantation. It has the potential to increase the number of liver grafts available for transplantation.     

No ocular involvement in familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy ATTR V30M domino liver recipients

In many transplantation centers domino liver transplantation is an established procedure, increasing the number of available liver grafts. Increasingly, grafts from familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) patients are used. Ocular involvement is a well known manifestation of FAP, and can be vision-threatening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of development of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy ocular manifestations in domino liver recipients. Forty-four cirrhotic patients submitted to liver transplantation were studied, with an average of 6 years of follow up after the procedure. Twenty two patients had received a liver from a FAP donor (Group 1) and 22 had received a liver from a non-FAP cadaveric donor (Group 2). Both groups were similar for mean age and gender. Routine ophthalmological examinations with particular attention to amyloid deposition in the anterior segment and vitreous, peripheral retina state, lacrimal functions tests (Schirmer and tear break-up time) and pupillometry (dynamic and static) were performed. No statistically significant differences were observed in all studied ophthalmic parameters between the two groups. No FAP related ophthalmic manifestations were detected after 6 years of domino liver transplantation, but further prospective regular ophthalmological examinations are necessary to detect the eventual development of late ocular manifestations.     

Domino liver transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation is today an established treatment for end stage liver diseases. However, the ongoing shortage of suitable livers together with progressively longer waiting lists prevents many patients from being transplanted, and many patients die while being on the waiting list. Using livers from living donors is one way to increase the supply of liver grafts. Another group of potential living liver donors are some selected liver recipients, whose native explanted liver in turn can be considered for transplantation into another patient. This unorthodox procedure have been named domino liver transplantation (DLT). The domino approach can be considered in patients with some genetic or biochemical disorders that today are treated by liver transplantation. The underlying rationale is that such livers ultimately cause severe systemic disease but are otherwise normal. In this review we present the current world status of DLT as well as updated results from the Domino Liver World Transplant Register (DLTR) and our own experience at the Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge with the DLT procedure.     

Operative Risks of Domino Liver Transplantation for the Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy Liver Donor and Recipient: A Double Analysis

Although domino liver transplantation (LT) is an established procedure, data about the operative risks are limited. This study aimed at evaluating the operative risks of domino LT. Two retrospective analyses were conducted (comparison of familial amyloid polyneuropathy [FAP] liver donors [61 patients] vs. FAP nondonors [39 patients] and FAP liver recipients [61 patients] vs. deceased donor liver recipients [61 patients]). First analysis showed a 60‐day mortality of 6.6% for FAP donors and 7.7% for FAP nondonors (p = 1.0). No patient developed primary graft nonfunction. Acute rejection was higher in FAP nondonors compared to FAP donors (38.5% vs. 13.1%). Both groups had similar vascular and biliary complication rates. ICU stay was similar, whereas total hospitalization was longer for FAP nondonors. Both groups had similar 1‐ and 5‐year patient and graft survival rates (83.4% vs. 87.2%, and 79.8% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.7) and (83.3% vs. 87.2%, and 79.1% vs.71.8%, p = 0.7). The second analysis showed a 1.6% mortality for FAP liver recipients vs. 3.2% of the control group (p = 1). Both groups had similar morbidity and technical complication rates (18.0% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.45) and (0.18 vs. 0.15, p = 0.65). The domino procedure does not add any risk to FAP donor or recipient. It increases the organ pool allowing transplantation of marginal recipients who otherwise are denied deceased donor liver transplantation.     

Outcomes of Domino Liver Transplantation: A Single Institution's Experience

Aims

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) is a strategy to increase the donor pool. Explanted liver from patients with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) are often used as domino grafts, because the liver is normal apart from the production of the mutated transthyretin variant. We present the outcomes for both donors and recipients of DLT.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis of initial DLT for 16 consecutive adult patients performed between July 2004 and July 2009. All cases of FAP donor to grafts were removed preserving the cava vein with reconstruction of the hepatic veins, except the first and seventh cases, where in we removed the retrohepatic vena cava with the liver without venovenous bypass. The postoperative follow-up period for surviving DLT recipients at the end of September 2009 was 2-62 months (mean, 26).

Results

Two patients out of 8 FAP donors died due to pulmonary thromboembolism on the 31st postransplant day, or sepsis at 35 days namely, an overall survival of 75%. One patient out of 8 recipients died namely, an early portal thrombosis on the 22nd postransplant day) with a crude survival of 87.5% in the recipient group (P = no significant [NS]). Four grafts from 8 FAP donors were lost—2 deaths and 2 retransplants due to thrombotic events on the first and second postransplant day—with a crude survival of 50%. Two of 8 recipients lost their grafts: 1 death and 1 retransplantation for an acute Budd-Chiari syndrome on the first postransplant day with a crude survival of 75% in the recipient group (P = not significant [NS]).

Conclusion

We believe that the FAP liver graft is an excellent option for selected patients. Special care must be taken with thrombotic events.     

Long-term consequences of domino liver transplantation using familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy grafts

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) using grafts from patients with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) is an established procedure at many transplantation centers. However, data evaluating the long-term outcome of DLT are limited. The aim of the present study was to analyze the risk of de novo polyneuropathy, possibly because of amyloidosis, and the patient survival after DLT. At our department, 28 DLT using FAP grafts were conducted between January 1997 and December 2005. One patient was twice subjected to DLT. Postoperative neurological monitoring of peripheral nerve function was performed with electroneurography (ENeG) in 20 cases. An ENeG index based on 12 parameters was calculated and correlated to age and/or height. Three patients developed ENeG signs of polyneuropathy 2-5 years after the DLT, but with no clinical symptoms. The 1-, 3- and 5-year actuarial patient survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients (n = 12) and non-HCC patients (n = 15) was 67%, 15%, 15% and 93%, 93%, 80%, respectively (P = 0.001). Development of impaired nerve conduction in a proportion of patients may indicate that de novo amyloidosis occurs earlier than previously expected. Survival after DLT was excellent except in patients with advanced HCC.     

Familial amyloid polyneuropathy type I (Portuguese): distribution and characterization of renal amyloid deposits

Renal amyloidosis has been considered rare and late in the evolution of the transthyretin (TTR) familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) of the Portuguese type (type I). Renal biopsy has been performed systematically in 14 patients with FAP type I before liver transplantation. In all patients, TTR Met30 mutation was shown. Seven had proteinuria or abnormal microalbuminuria, whereas seven others had no urinary abnormalities. All had renal amyloid deposition predominantly in the medulla. Glomerular and vascular involvement was more prominent in patients with urinary abnormalities. Patients with the most extensive renal lesions represented a subgroup with a low score of polyneuropathy disability, a high prevalence of nephropathy in the proband generation, or a late onset for relatives with nephropathy. Immunohistochemistry studies showed that the amyloid substance corresponded to transthyretin. We have shown that renal TTR-derived amyloid deposition is common in patients with FAP type I, even in the absence of urinary abnormalities. The clinical presentation of nephropathy is not a late occurrence in the disease.     

Domino liver transplantation: indications, techniques, and outcomes

The long-term shortage of livers available for transplantation has spurred the development of many strategies to bolster the donor organ supply. One particularly innovative strategy is domino liver transplantation in which a select group of liver transplant recipients can donate their explanted native livers for use as liver grafts in other patients. Several hereditary metabolic diseases (such as familial amyloid polyneuropathy, maple syrup urine disease, and familial hypercholesterolemia) are caused by aberrant or deficient protein production in the liver, and these conditions can be cured with an orthotopic liver transplant. Although their native livers eventually caused severe systemic disease in these patients, these livers are otherwise structurally and functionally normal, and they have been used successfully in domino liver transplants for the past 15 years. This article will review the indications for donating or receiving a domino liver transplant, the surgical techniques necessary to perform these transplants, as well as the recently revealed long-term outcomes and risks of domino transplantation.     

Effects of a Domino Liver Transplantation Program on Patient Survival and Waiting List Time: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Explanted livers from patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy have often been used for domino liver transplantation (DLT). This has expanded the organ pool for liver transplantation. We evaluated the effects of a single-center DLT program on waiting list duration and patient survival. Liver transplants conducted from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed. Selected patients, all liver transplant candidates above the age of 60 years and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, were offered DLT. Survival, time on waiting list, and operative factors were evaluated. The study group included 485 patients transplanted with grafts from deceased donors (conventional liver transplantation) and 149 patients who were offered and accepted a potential DLT, of whom 34 underwent DLT and 115 did not; these patients received a deceased donor graft (non-DLT). Five-year and overall estimated survival rates respectively were 79% and 54.4% for DLT and 67.6% and 46.7% for non-DLT (P = .67, log rank test). No differences were noted in survival (P = .816) or waiting times (P = 1.0) between DLT and non-DLT groups. As expected, survival time in the conventional liver transplantation group was longer (84.7% and 60.6%, P < .001). Donor age and ischemia time were significantly different between DLT and non-DLT (P < .001). DLT has enabled 6% additional transplantations without affecting waiting time or survival (34/600).     

Temporary Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Using a Small Graft for Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

Donor shortage is a major issue in liver transplantation. We have successfully performed temporary auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) using a small volume graft procured from a living donor for recipients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). The aim of this study was to evaluate this procedure by comparing it with standard living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We compared 13 recipients undergoing this procedure with 23 recipients undergoing a standard LDLT for the treatment of FAP. The estimated donor graft volume and the graft volume/recipient's standard liver volume ratio were significantly smaller in the temporary APOLT group than in the standard LDLT group. Postoperative complications were comparable, although the hospital stay was longer in the temporary APOLT group. All the patients safely underwent a remnant native liver resection about 2 months after their first operation in the temporary APOLT group. No symptoms related to FAP developed before the remnant liver resection, and no significant differences in graft and patient survival were observed between the two groups. We successfully performed temporary APOLT using a small volume liver graft without postoperative liver failure for FAP. Temporary APOLT for FAP might be a useful alternative procedure for expanding the donor pool for LDLT.     

Domino liver transplant: influence on the number of donors and transplant coordination

The shortage of organs forces coordinators to seek new forms of generating organs for transplantation of the increasing numbers of patients on waiting lists. A recent technique called sequential transplant or domino liver transplant (DLT) allows the transplantation of a patient with chronic liver disease by implantation of a full-size liver derived from a patient with familial amyloidosis polyneuropathy (FAP) who receives a cadaveric graft. Therefore, it is possible to transplant two patients with only one cadaveric liver. The present report illustrates the use of this technique for the first time in our country, thereby increasing the number of hepatic transplants by 25%.     

Effect of tacrolimus and partial hepatectomy on transthyretin metabolism in rats

Liver transplantation, which serves as treatment of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP), and domino liver transplantation, which utilizes resected livers from patients with FAP for treatment of liver diseases, may induce changes in transthyretin (TTR), a pathogenic FAP-related protein. To evaluate this possibility, we performed a 70% hepatectomy or administered tacrolimus to Dark Agouti (DA) rats for 7 days and then measured changes in liver TTR mRNA levels and changes in serum TTR concentrations. After hepatectomy, TTR mRNA levels decreased by 77%; at day 3, they returned to preoperative levels. Except for slightly elevated serum TTR concentrations 12 h after operation, serum TTR levels remained unchanged. Thus, partial hepatectomy did not influence serum TTR concentrations. After tacrolimus administration, TTR mRNA declined by 56% 12 h after the experiment started; however, after day 3, a rebound phenomenon occurred until day 7. Tacrolimus may facilitate serum TTR degradation, although production of TTR in the liver also increased. This finding -- that TTR, the source of FAP-inducing amyloid, did not increase after transplantation -- may help post-transplantation treatment of patients who have FAP and other liver diseases.     

Domino liver transplantation using a graft from a donor with familial hypercholesterolemia: seven-yr follow-up

Abstract:  A 46-yr-old female with hepatocellular carcinoma and severe hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis received a domino liver graft from a 25-yr-old female with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFHC) in September 2001. Hypercholesterolemia occurred in the graft recipient within one yr after transplantation and was partially controlled by atorvastatin. Three yr after transplantation, an autologous CD34⁺ cell transplantation was performed in order to better control the hypercholesterolemia. Only preliminary results of this domino liver transplantation (DLT) were published in 2003, without a long-term analysis of the hypercholesterolemic effects in recipient. Subsequent to DLT, the average plasma cholesterol level in the domino donor rapidly normalized and seven yr after had a value of 182 mg/dL. After seven-yr follow-up, the domino recipient has no hepatocarcinoma recurrence. Moreover, no signs of cardiovascular or atherosclerotic lesions were noted despite an elevated plasma cholesterol level (339 mg/dL after seven yr of follow-up) resistant to drug therapy and stem cell autotransplantation. In conclusion, DLT using a liver graft from a patient with HFHC provides a viable option for marginal recipients.     

Domino and split liver transplantation: technical problems

Because the shortage of donor livers has been the rate-limiting factor in the expansion of liver transplantation, several innovative techniques including reduced, split, and living donor liver transplantation have been developed to expand the relatively constant pool of organs. Domino liver transplantation, which was first reported from Portugal in 1995, has been performed worldwide and allows a donor organ to be used for a subsequent graft in a second liver recipient. Domino liver transplantation involves specific ethical and technical problems. The most important ethical problem in the procedure is the use of a diseased liver (e.g., familial amyloid polyneuropathy [FAP]) for a second recipient. Furthermore, the safety of the first recipient (FAP patient) should be the primary consideration. From the technical point of view, the management of short vascular cuffs is important, especially in domino liver transplantation from a living donor. The results of split liver transplantation have significantly improved and it is now recognized as an ideal method to expand the donor pool, especially for small children. Either the ex vivo or in vivo technique can be used with comparable results.