Spleen enlargement in healthy donors during G-CSF mobilization of PBPCs

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human G-CSF is widely used to mobilize PBPCs in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. There have been concerns about donor safety because of splenic ruptures during G-CSF application. To address this problem, changes in splenic size in 91 healthy donors during G-CSF mobilization of allogeneic PBPCs were investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For mobilization, G-CSF in a dosage of 7.5 microg per kg per day was administered for 5 days and PBPC collection started Day 5. Splenic size was determined by ultrasound before G-CSF application was started and on the day of the first apheresis. RESULTS: The mean increase in splenic length was 11 mm (range, 0-28 mm; p<0.0001), whereas a mean increase of 5 mm in width (range, 0-14 mm; p<0.0001) was measured. No major side effects could be observed. There was no significant correlation between the increase in splenic size and the hematologic values, or the age and body-mass index. In a multivariant analysis, no independent risk factor for the development of a spleen enlargement over 19 mm in length and 9 mm in thickness was found in 20 percent of investigated donors. CONCLUSION: In this prospective trial, a significant spleen enlargement was observed in healthy donors during G-CSF mobilization of allogeneic PBPCs. Further investigations are needed to define the degree of spleen enlargement with higher G-CSF dosages to improve donor safety.     

Equivalent mobilization and collection of granulocytes for transfusion after administration of glycosylated G-CSF (3 microg/kg) plus dexamethasone versus glycosylated G-CSF (12 microg/kg) alone

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find a regimen for mobilization and collection of granulocytes that combines low-dose G-CSF administration with satisfactory PMN mobilization and apheresis at a low rate of donor adverse reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 52 healthy unrelated volunteers received a single subcutaneous injection of glycosylated G-CSF (Lenograstim Chugai-Pharma, Frankfurt, Germany) at medians of 3.1 (range, 2.4-3.6) microg per kg plus dexamethasone (8 mg orally; n = 29) or at 11.8 (7.1-18.5) microg of lenograstim per kg (p < or = 0.0001) without dexamethasone (n = 23) and underwent standard apheresis using the PMN program of a cell separator (Spectra, COBE [now Gambro] BCT). WBC and PMN mobilization results and apheresis yields were compared and the severity and clinical significance of donor adverse reactions was evaluated. RESULTS: For the low-dose G-CSF plus dexamethasone versus the high-dose G-CSF alone group, similar mobilization results were observed for WBCs with 31.3 (19.1-44.9) x 10(9) per L versus 27.5 (19.2-44.0) x 10(9) per L (p = 0.21, NS) and PMNs with 29.0 (17.6-42.2) x 10(9) per L versus 25.2 (16.2-39.0) x 10(9) per L (p = 0.08, NS). The PMN apheresis yields were equal with 70 (39-139) x 10(9) per unit with low-dose G-CSF versus 68 (33-120) x 10(9) per unit in the high-dose G-CSF group (p = 0.83, NS). Regarding donor adverse reactions, 7 out of 29 (24%) and 8 out of 23 donors (35%) reported moderate or severe symptoms. The character of these reactions was different; symptoms of greater clinical significance and a higher need for analgesics were observed in the high-dose G-CSF group. CONCLUSIONS: A Lenograstim dose of 3 microg per kg plus DXM assures effective PMN mobilization and acceptable apheresis components. The combination of glycosylated G-CSF with DXM allows a significant dose reduction in G-CSF for PMN mobilization and collection as compared with higher G-CSF doses alone. In the high-dose G-CSF mobilization group, adverse reactions were more severe and required more analgesics.     

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached. RESULTS: The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield. CONCLUSION: These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.     

Second donation of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells: risk factors associated with a low yield of CD34+ cells

BACKGROUND: There are still limited data on the efficacy and safety of repeated donations of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-seven healthy donors undergoing two consecutive mobilizations of PBPCs within a median interval of 5 months (range, 0.1-47 months) were investigated. For both first mobilization (FM) and second mobilization (SM), G-CSF (lenograstim) at 7.5 microg per kg per day was administered. RESULTS: The nonhematologic side effects were comparable between both mobilizations. A significantly lower yield of CD34+ cells x 10(6) per kg of donor weight was obtained on Day 5 of SM in female (n = 31; FM, 5.0; SM, 3.23; p = 0.008) but not in male (n = 36; FM, 5.96; SM, 5.36; p = 0.24) donors. Multivariate analysis identified a lower CD34+ blood concentration on Day 5 of FM (p < 0.001) as well as female sex (p = 0.015) as independent risk factors for a lower yield of progenitor cells, whereas donor age and body mass index, interval between donations, and schedule of G-CSF application showed no significant impact. CONCLUSION: The identified risk factors allow the estimation of the efficacy of a SM in an individual donor before G-CSF administration, thus avoiding distress to both the donor and the recipient.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF

BACKGROUND: The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery. RESULTS: The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.     

A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: Current regimens for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma are based on daily subcutaneous injections of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting shortly after cytotoxic therapy. Recently a polyethylene glycol-conjugated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) was introduced that has a substantially longer t(1/2) than the original formula. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The use of pegfilgrastim was examined at two dose levels for PBPC mobilization in patients with Stage II or III multiple myeloma. Four days after cytotoxic therapy with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)), a single dose of either 6 mg pegfilgrastim (n = 15) or 12 mg pegfilgrastim (n = 15) or daily doses of 8 microg per kg unconjugated G-CSF (n = 15) were administered. The number of circulating CD34+ cells was determined during white blood cell (WBC) recovery, and PBPC harvesting was performed by large-volume apheresis. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim was equally potent at 6 and 12 mg with regard to mobilization and yield of CD34+ cells. No dose dependence was observed because CD34+ cell concentration peaks were 131 and 85 per microL, respectively, and CD34+ cell yield was 10.2 x 10(6) and 7.4 x 10(6) per kg of body weight, respectively. Pegfilgrastim in either dose was associated with a more rapid WBC recovery (p = 0.03) and an earlier performance of the first apheresis procedure (p < 0.05) in comparison to unconjugated G-CSF. No difference regarding CD34+ cell maximum and yield could be observed. CONCLUSION: A single dose of 6 mg pegfilgrastim is equally potent as 12 mg for mobilization and harvest of PBPCs in patients with multiple myeloma. Because no dose dependency was seen at these dose levels, this might be also true for even smaller doses.     

Poor mobilizer and its countermeasures

Mobilization failure is a major concern in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation, especially in an autologous setting, as almost all donor harvests can be accomplished with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone. Poor mobilizers, defined as those with a peripheral blood CD34⁺ cell count ≤20 cells/μl after mobilization preceding apheresis is a significant risk factor for mobilization failure. We recommend preemptive plerixafor plus G-CSF (filgrastim, 10?μg/kg daily) as a first mobilization strategy, which yields sufficient peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in almost all patients and avoids otherwise unnecessary remobilization. Preemptive plerixafor is administered in patients with a day-4 peripheral blood CD34⁺ count <15, depending on the disease and the target PBPC amount. Cyclophosphamide is reserved for patients who fail the first PBPC collection. We recommend second mobilization for patients who could not achieve a sufficient PBPC amount with the first mobilization. In these patients, a second attempt with plerixafor plus G-CSF or mobilization with plerixafor in combination with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF is recommended. Increased dose and/or twice daily administration of G-CSF can be considered.     

G-CSF-induced spleen size changes in peripheral blood progenitor cell donors

BACKGROUND: PBPC donors given G-CSF experience splenic enlargement and, rarely, spontaneous rupture of the spleen. This study evaluated the incidence and time course of splenic enlargement in PBPC concentrate donors and assessed factors affecting size changes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty healthy adults were given G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) for 5 days and a PBPC concentrate was collected by apheresis. Ultrasound was used to assess craniocaudal spleen length before giving G-CSF, on the day of apheresis and 3 or 4 days after apheresis. The effects of donor age, gender, race, and changes in blood chemistries, blood counts, and CD34+ cell counts on spleen length change were assessed. RESULTS: Spleen length increased in 19 of 20 donors. Mean length changed from 10.9 +/- 2.0 cm before G-CSF to 12.3 +/- 2.1 cm on the day of apheresis (p < 0.001). The mean increase in length was 1.5 +/- 0.9 cm or 13.8 +/- 9.1 percent. Spleen length increased 20 percent or more in six subjects. The spleen length fell to 11.3 +/- 1.8 cm (p < 0.001) 3 or 4 days after apheresis, but it remained greater than baseline levels (p = 0.03). Spleen length change was not affected by donor gender, race, or age. There was no relationship between changes in spleen length and 1) baseline and apheresis-day blood counts and chemistries, or 2) changes in blood counts and chemistries. CONCLUSIONS: Spleen size increases in almost all PBPC donors. Enlargement is transient but may be marked in some donors and may place them at risk for splenic rupture.     

The determinants of granulocyte yield in 1198 granulocyte concentrates collected from unrelated volunteer donors mobilized with dexamethasone and granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor: a 13-year experience

BACKGROUND: The combination of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF [filgrastim]) and dexamethasone (G-CSF/dex) is an effective granulocyte mobilization regimen, but the variables that affect donor neutrophil response and granulocyte collection yield are not well characterized.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A computerized database containing records of 1198 granulocyte collections from 137 unrelated volunteer apheresis donors during a 13-year period was retrospectively analyzed. Donors were categorized by age, sex, and cumulative number of granulocyte donations. Complete blood counts at baseline and after G-CSF/dex stimulation were recorded. The outcome variables include the preprocedure absolute neutrophil count (preANC), which reflects G-CSF/dex stimulation, and the granulocyte product yield per liter processed (BagGranYield/L).
RESULTS: Higher baseline ANC and platelet (PLT) counts were significantly associated with higher preANC while a larger number of prior granulocytapheresis procedures was associated with lower preANC. Total filgrastim dose (used in weight-based dosing) did not significantly impact preANC or the granulocyte yield; weight-based dosing at 5 µg per kg and a uniform 480-µg dose produced equivalent preANC. PreANC and weight were the key determinants of granulocyte yield (BagGranYield/L).
CONCLUSION: Apheresis donors with higher baseline PLT counts and ANCs have higher ANCs after G-CSF/dex stimulation; donor age, weight, and sex do not have a significant impact. A uniform G-CSF dose of 480 µg is as effective as weight-based dosing at 5 µg per kg. Donor ANC monitoring should be considered after serial granulocytapheresis procedures.     

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells with an automated leukapheresis system

BACKGROUND: Apheresis devices designed for the collection of mature blood elements are being used for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs).The collection of PBPCs differs from that of other cells in the rarity of the target cell and in the fact that donors may undergo several days of collection. A consequence of this process may be a depletion of blood cells such as platelets from the blood. The disposable set and operating software for an apheresis device (Spectra, COBE BCT) was modified by the manufacturer to automate the collection of PBPCs and reduce the collection of unwanted blood cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A study was initiated to compare the collection of PBPCs with the new device, the AutoPBSC (version [V]6.0 with AutoPBSC tubing set), and that with the MNC (mononuclear cell) procedure (V4.7 with white cell tubing set), for patients and healthy donors. RESULTS: Patients whose blood was processed by either theV6.0 orV4.7 procedure achieved the target dose of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of patient weight in similar numbers of procedures, even though the calculated collection efficiency for CD34+ cells using the automated V6.0 procedure was significantly less than that with the V4.7 procedure for both allogeneic donors and patients donating PBPCs. The collection efficiency for platelets was lower with the V6.0 procedure, and components collected in this manner contained fewer platelets. Apheresis by the V6.0 procedure required 30 to 60 more minutes per procedure than apheresis by the V4.7 procedure. Review of engraftment kinetics after transplantation did not reveal any effect of the collection procedure on recipients of either allogeneic or autologous transplants. CONCLUSION: The collection efficiencies of the V6.0 procedure for both CD34+ cells and mature blood cells are lower than those of the V4.7 procedure.The lower collection efficiency for platelets results in a smaller drop in peripheral blood platelet count after the procedure.The automated features of the V6.0 procedure may simplify PBPC collection, but this procedure requires a longer apheresis.     

The role of diagnosis in patients failing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

BACKGROUND: Failure to mobilize PBPCs for auto-logous transplantation has mostly been attributed to previous therapy and poses therapeutic problems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The role of underlying disease was analyzed in 17 of 73 (23%) patients with PBPC mobilization failure, and secondary mobilization with high-dose filgrastim was attempted. RESULTS: Of 16 patients with acute leukemia, 13 (81%) mobilized poorly. In contrast, of 57 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and solid tumor, 53 (93%, p < 0.001) showed good PBPC mobilization. Relapsed disease did not predispose to poor mobilization. As secondary mobilization attempt, 7 patients received 25 micro g per kg per day filgrastim without chemotherapy leading to a 3.7 +/- 2.8-fold (SD) increase in the maximum number of circulating CD34+ cells (p = 0.104). PBPC apheresis yielded 3.3 (+/-0.5) x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight in 5 patients. Four poor mobilizers received 50 micro g per kg per day filgrastim as second or third mobilization attempt. Circulating CD34+ cells in these patients increased by 1.5 (+/-0.7) compared with the primary G-CSF application. CONCLUSION: Selective PBPC mobilization failure was seen in patients with acute leukemia whereas remarkably good mobilization was seen in other malignancies. Increasing the filgrastim dose to 25 micro g per kg per day may allow PBPC collection in patients failing PBPC mobilization.     

Characterization and functional analysis of granulocyte concentrates collected from donors after repeated G-CSF stimulation

BACKGROUND: Neutropenic patients often develop bacterial or fungal infections not responding to broad-spectrum antibacterial or antifungal agents. Clinical efforts were made with transfusion of granulocyte concentrates; however, functions of granulocytes after multiple G-CSF stimulations and after apheresis are not yet investigated and described sufficiently. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to characterize functional and immunologic variables of granulocytes in blood samples drawn from donors before and after each stimulation episode with G-CSF, in the resulting granulocyte concentrates and in the patients 8 hours after transfusion. RESULTS: Chemotaxis was not influenced, neither by G-CSF application nor by apheresis. Multiple G-CSF stimulations enhanced oxidative burst and phagocytosis of Escherichia coli in donor granulocytes. These values returned to basal levels in granulocyte concentrates. Expression of granulocytic surface antigens was downregulated after application of G-CSF but returned to normal and in part enhanced values in concentrates. A clinically relevant increase of proinflammatory cytokines could not be detected. Leukotriene B4 production was reduced after the fourth G-CSF stimulation in the donor blood and enhanced in the granulocyte concentrate after apheresis. Results in recipients indicate that changes of granulocyte function noted in concentrates were only transient. CONCLUSION: Stimulation of healthy donors with repeated G-CSF injections and subsequent granulocyte apheresis does not dramatically change decisive functions of granulocytes.     

Treatment of normal individuals with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: donor experiences and the effects on peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and on the collection of peripheral blood stem cells

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used in patients to increase the level of circulating hematopoietic progenitors. Although G-CSF has been administered to some healthy individuals, the kinetics of mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), the optimum dose schedule and the incidence and nature of adverse reactions in normal individuals are not completely defined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Normal individuals (n = 102) who received G- CSF for 5 or 10 days at doses of 2, 5, 7.5, or 10 micrograms per kg per day were studied. The subjects were observed for symptoms and physical changes, and blood samples were obtained for a variety of laboratory tests. After 5 or 10 days of G-CSF treatment, PBSCs were collected by apheresis and analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 89 percent of the individuals completed the 5-day treatment protocol and 88 percent completed the 10- day protocol without modification of the dose of G-CSF administered. Ninety percent of donors experienced some side effect of G-CSF. The most frequent effects noted were bone pain (83%), headache (39%), body aches (23%), fatigue (14%), and nausea and/or vomiting (12%). The dose of G-CSF administered directly affected the proportion of people with bone pain (p = 0.025) or body aches (p = 0.045) or who were feeling hot or having night sweats (p = 0.02) or taking analgesics (p = 0.01). With the 5-day dose schedule, several changes in serum chemistries occurred, including increases in alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.0013), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.0001), and sodium (p = 0.0001). Decreases occurred in glucose (p = 0.045), potassium (p = 0.0004), bilirubin (p = 0.001), and blood urea nitrogen (p = 0.0017). In donors who received G-CSF for 5 days, the absolute neutrophil count was increased after one G-CSF dose, and it reached a maximum on Day 6, as did the number of CD34+ cells (64.6 +/? 55.9 × 10(6) cells/L). In those same donors, the platelet count after apheresis on Day 6 was 32 +/? 13 percent lower than pretreatment values (250 +/? 42 × 10(9) cells/L). In donors receiving G-CSF for 10 days, the neutrophil count reached a maximum on Day 8, but the number of CD34+ cells peaked on Day 6 (58.3 +/? 52.1 × 10(5) cells/L) and then declined. The platelet count decreased from pretreatment values by 28 +/? 12 percent prior to apheresis on Day 11. When individuals were treated for 5 days with G-CSF, the quantity of CD34+ cells collected was directly related to the G-CSF dose. When 5 micrograms per kg per day was given, 2.80 +/? 1.81 × 10(8) cells were collected, compared with collection of 4.67 +/? 3.11 × 10(8) cells when 10 micrograms per kg per day was given (p = 0.04). More important, PBSCs collected after 10 days of G-CSF administration (5 micrograms/kg/day) had significantly fewer CD34+ cells (0.82 +/? 0.37 × 10(8) cells, p = 0.01) than did PBSCs collected after 5 days of G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day). CONCLUSION: Most normal donors receiving G-CSF experience side effects, but these are mild to moderate in degree. Some alterations in blood chemistries occur, but none were clinically serious. Because of the symptoms associated with G-CSF, these individuals must be monitored closely. The treatment of normal donors with G-CSF for more than 5 days significantly decreased the number of circulating CD34+ cells and the quantity collected by apheresis.     

Delayed massive immune hemolysis mediated by minor ABO incompatibility after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow transplantation with minor ABO incompatibility may be followed by moderate delayed hemolysis of the recipient's red cells by donor-derived ABO antibodies. This reaction may be more severe after transplantation of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old boy underwent an allogeneic PBPC transplant from his HLA-mismatched mother as treatment for acute myeloblastic leukemia that had proved resistant to induction chemotherapy. Transfusion of the unmanipulated PBPCs proceeded without any complication, despite the difference in ABO blood group (donor, O Rh-positive; recipient, A Rh-positive). On Day 7, a rapid drop in hemoglobin to 4 g per dL was observed, which was attributed to a massive hemolysis. All the recipient's group A red cells were destroyed within 36 hours. This delayed and rapidly progressive hemolytic anemia was not associated with the transfusion of the donor's plasma. Rather, the anti-A titer increased in parallel with marrow recovery, which suggested an active synthesis of these antibodies by immunocompetent cells from the donor against the recipient's red cells. The mother's anti-A titer was retrospectively found to be 2048. Her unusually high titer is probably due to prior sensitization during pregnancies. On Day 12, the patient developed grade IV graft-versus-host disease, which proved resistant to all treatments instituted and led to his death on Day 35. CONCLUSION: PBPC transplantation with minor ABO incompatibility may be associated with significant risk of massive delayed hemolysis.     

The value of pre-donation pulse assessment for apheresis donors

Objectives: During apheresis, donors have up to 6·5 L of blood processed and receive citrated plasma during the return cycle. It is of concern that a donor with an unrecognised significant cardiac abnormality might therefore be put at further risk during apheresis. Background: Apheresis donors with cardiac abnormalities may be at increased risk of severe adverse reactions as a result of repeated volume loss or the adverse effect of citrate anticoagulant on cardiac contractility as the result of reduction in ionised calcium. An abnormal rate or rhythm may indicate a cardiac abnormality. Methods: At two donation centres between May 2001 and April 2009, the pulse rate and rhythm of every donor was measured before each apheresis procedure they underwent. Donors with a pulse rate outside the range 50–100 beats per minute and/or pulse irregularity were deferred from donation and referred to their general practitioner (GP). Results: Data from 3945 apheresis donors (3874 platelet donors, 71 plasma donors, 3595 males, 350 females) were reviewed. Two hundred thirty‐eight donors (6%) were identified as having abnormal pulses and were referred to their GP. Eighty‐one donors had bradycardia, 16 had tachycardia and 141 had an irregular pulse. Fifteen of the 3945 donors (0·4%) were found to have significant cardiac disease and withdrawn from the donor panel. Conclusions: By simple monitoring, donors who may be at increased risk from the apheresis procedure can be identified. By performing pre‐donation pulse assessment of all apheresis donors, we fulfil our medicolegal duty by not putting donors at avoidable risk.     

重组人G-CSF对健康供者外周造血干／祖细胞动员和采集效果的影响因素分析

应用重组人粒系集落刺激因子（rhG—CSF）对健康供者进行动员并采集造血干细胞用于异基因外周血造血干细胞移植已在临床广泛应用，本研究通过对影响外周干细胞动员和采集效果的多因素分析，进一步探讨最佳动员方案及采集时机。采取回顾性方法分析了431例健康供者外周血干细胞动员采集效果，并进一步分析了供者一般特征、rhG—CSF动员天数、每日皮下注射次数、剂量与采集效果的关系。结果表明：rhG—CSF在动员中平均应用剂量为5．7μg／（kg·d），平均采集1．7次，收获单个核细胞数平均为9．57×10^8／kg，CD34^＋细胞平均为4．91×10^6／kg。绝大多数供者不良反应轻微。多因素分析结果显示，采集效率主要与供者体重指数，采集天数相关。rhG—CSF动员第5天采集的供者，其MNC数、CD34^＋细胞数及第一次单采成功率均优于其他时间采集的供者。同时，本组供者应用rhG—CSF剂量较小且剂量范围较窄，rhG—CSF剂量不如采集时间对采集物质量的影响明显。结论：小剂量应用rhG—CSF动员并于第5天开始采集是健康供者造血干细胞动员的较理想方案。     

CD34+ cell mobilization for allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation: efficacy of a short course of G-CSF

BACKGROUND: G-CSF-mobilized PBPCs are considered the richest source of HPCs for both autologous and allogeneic transplantation, but, despite their wide use, the best dose and schedule for G-CSF administration have not been definitively established. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With a target of collecting from the peripheral blood > or = 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight of the recipient, the short-course administration of glycosylated G-CSF (gly-G-CSF) in 30 healthy donors for an allogeneic transplantation was investigated. Gly-G-CSF was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 microg per kg per day in two divided doses over 3 days and was followed by a leukapheresis (on the 4th day) 12 hours after the last dose. RESULTS: A median of 53.5 circulating CD34+ cells per microL (range, 19-190) was found in the 30 donors on the day of first leukapheresis, which allowed a median CD34+ cell collection of 6.0 x 10(6) per kg of body weight of the donor and 6.5 x 10(6) per kg of body weight of the recipient. In 25 (83%) of 30 donors, a single procedure was sufficient to collect the target CD34+ cells, while in the other 5, two leukapheresis procedures were required. Hematologic reconstitution was observed in all patients at a median of 14 days (range, 10-23) for neutrophils and 14.5 days (range, 11-46) for platelets. With a median infusion of 3.9 x 10(8) CD3+ T-lymphocytes per kg of body weight of the recipient (range, 1.3-7.8), acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 13 (43%) of 30 and 15 (60%) of 25 evaluable patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 337 days from transplant, 22 (73%) of 30 patients are alive in complete remission. CONCLUSION: A schedule consisting of 3-day administration of gly-G-CSF followed by a single leukapheresis can be proposed and widely accepted by healthy donors, as 84 percent of them reach the target in the estimated time with a reduced drug exposure. The cost of the procedure is reduced, in terms of both the growth factor administration and the number of leukapheresis procedures. The search for the optimum methods of donor management may improve the acceptability of this procedure and increase the number of allogeneic transplantations from PBPCs.     

The timing of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor administration after chemotherapy does not affect stem and progenitor cell apheresis yield: a retrospective study of 65 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal time for postchemotherapy granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration before peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell (PBPC) collection is not well defined. The impact of G-CSF scheduling on the number of CD34+ cells collected by leukapheresis from 65 patients with malignant disease was studied retrospectively. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Chemotherapy was performed on Days 1 and 2 and was followed by G-CSF to mobilize PBPCs. In Group 1, 30 patients received the first dose of G-CSF immediately after the end of chemotherapy, as commonly recommended. In Group 2, 35 patients received the first G-CSF dose after the end of chemotherapy (Days 7 or 8). RESULTS: No difference was observed between the two groups in white cell recovery and the median number of CD34+ cells harvested. The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain the minimal number of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was the same. The proportion of patients with a failure of PBPC collection was similar, and G-CSF consumption was reduced in Group 2 without increasing infectious risks. CONCLUSION: Early administration of G-CSF after chemotherapy appears not to be a prerequisite for satisfactory PBPC collection. This approach could allow significant savings in terms of medical cost. A randomized and prospective study would be necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

A combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide and colony-stimulating factors is more cost-effective than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors alone in mobilizing peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells

BACKGROUND: The use of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) instead of autologous bone marrow leads to more rapid engraftment following high-dose chemotherapy. Mobilization regimens differ with respect to toxicity, efficiency, and cost. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with breast cancer received one of two mobilization regimens: granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 10 micrograms per kg was given subcutaneously for 5 days, with leukapheresis begun on Day 6, or low-dose cyclophosphamide followed by sequential granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF) at 5 micrograms per kg for 5 days and by G-CSF at 10 micrograms per kg, with leukapheresis begun on Day 11. Results of CD34+ cell collection, engraftment, and costs of mobilization were determined. RESULTS: The combination chemotherapy and growth factor regimen was more efficient in mobilizing CD34+ cells. Sixty-six percent of patients reached a target 4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg in a single leukapheresis session with the combination regimen, compared to 14 percent who received G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). The mean number of leukapheresis sessions required to reach a target of 4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was 1.3 for the combination regimen and 2.7 for the regimen of G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). One patient in the chemotherapy and growth factor group developed febrile neutropenia. Engraftment was similar in both cohorts of patients. The cost of mobilization, including all supplies and cryopreservation, was $7381 for the G-CSF regimen and $5508 for the chemotherapy regimen (p < 0.05). This reduction was attributed to the lower number of leukapheresis and cryopreservation sessions, which outweighed the slight increase in expense for chemotherapy and growth factor in the combination regimen. CONCLUSION: This combination mobilization regimen allowed the predictable and efficient collection of CD34+ cells from the peripheral blood in a limited number of leukapheresis sessions, which reduced the cost of mobilization by approximately 25 percent.     

Mobilization kinetics of CD34+/Thy-1dim progenitor cells during recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration in normal donors

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic transplantation of granulocyte-colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) from normal related donors is effective in achieving engraftment with a relatively short period of posttransplantation aplasia. The optimal dose and composition of PBPC transplants are unknown. The CD34+/Thy-1dim progenitor cell subset is enriched for putative stem cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The kinetics of the primitive subpopulation were prospectively studied in nine normal donors receiving recombinant human G-CSF (6 microg/kg) subcutaneously twice daily for 6 days for collection of PBPCs for allogeneic transplantation. RESULTS: The concentration (mean +/− SD) of the circulating CD34+/Thy-1dim subset increased from a baseline of 0.9 +/− 0.9 × 10(3) to 29.2 +/− 22.1 × 10(3) per mL on Day 4 and 38.0 +/− 29.8 × 10(3) per mL on Day 6. The level of CD34+/Thy-1dim cells was closely correlated with the overall level of CD34+ cells. At baseline, CD34+/Thy-1dim cells composed 21.1 percent of the total CD34+ cells, increasing to 36.3 percent at the peak of mobilization. CONCLUSION: CD34+/Thy-1dim cells are optimally mobilized on Days 4 to 6 of recombinant human G-CSF treatment.