Three-dimensional shoulder kinematics during a pressure relief technique and wheelchair transfer

OBJECTIVE: To assess 3-dimensional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics in able-bodied subjects during a weight-relief raise and while transferring to and from a wheelchair. DESIGN: Repeated-measures analysis of variance. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five able-bodied subjects without spinal cord injury or shoulder symptoms (20 men, 5 women; age range, 20-37y). INTERVENTIONS: Completion of weight-relief raise and transfer tasks. Main Outcome Measures: An electromagnetic motion capture system tracked 3-dimensional position and orientation of the thorax, scapula, and humerus. Absolute angular values assessed included scapular downward and upward rotation, internal and external rotation, and posterior and anterior tipping all relative to the thorax, as well as humeral internal and external rotation relative to the scapula. Data were compared across 3 phases of the weight-relief raise and for transfer direction (leading arm, trailing arm). RESULTS: Key findings included significantly increased anterior tipping and internal rotation of the scapula and decreased scapular upward rotation and external rotation of the humerus during the weight-relief raise. The leading arm showed significantly greater scapular anterior tipping and internal rotation and less scapular upward rotation and humeral external rotation than the trailing arm during the final phase of the transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Both the weight-relief raise and transfer result in scapular and humeral positions and directions of motion that may negatively impact the available subacromial space. This may present increased risk for injury or progression of shoulder pain in persons who must routinely perform these tasks.     

Kinematics of the contralateral and ipsilateral shoulder: a possible relationship with post-stroke shoulder pain.

OBJECTIVE: Post-stroke shoulder pain is a common phenomenon in hemiplegia and impedes rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to identify a possible relationship between post-stroke shoulder pain, scapula resting position and shoulder motion. METHODS: Shoulder kinematics of 27 patients after stroke (17 men) were compared with 10 healthy age-matched control subjects. Using an electromagnetic tracking device, the kinematics of both the contralateral and ipsilateral (i.e. paretic and non-paretic) arm during active and passive abduction and forward flexion were measured and expressed in Euler angles. RESULTS: Scapular lateral rotation relative to the thorax was increased in patients with post-stroke shoulder pain compared with both patients without post-stroke shoulder pain and control subjects at rest as well as during arm abduction and forward flexion. Additionally, glenohumeral elevation was decreased in patients with post-stroke shoulder pain during passive abduction. No differences were found regarding scapula position (displacement relative to the thorax). CONCLUSION: In patients with post-stroke shoulder pain a particular kinematical shoulder pattern was established, characterized by enhanced scapular lateral rotation and diminished glenohumeral mobility.     

A Comparison of 3-D Shoulder Kinematics to Perform ADLs Between Older and Younger Adults

ABSTRACT

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the 3-D kinematics of older and younger adults during activities of daily living. Twenty-five older and 27 younger asymptomatic participants were evaluated. The MotionMonitor was used to collect humerus, scapula, and trunk kinematic data. Multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) were used to analyze kinematic differences. Significant differences between groups were found. In several comparisons, the older participants had significantly less shoulder joint complex motion than the younger participants. For feeding, the older participants had 16.3° less glenohumeral external rotation, 5.0° less scapular upward rotation, and 8.6° less scapular internal rotation. For reaching an overhead shelf, the older group had 8.1° less glenohumeral flexion, 11.8° less external rotation and 16.0° less scapular internal rotation. For hair combing, the older participants had 13.3° less glenohumeral external rotation, and 6.6° less scapular internal rotation. For washing the contralateral axilla, the older group had 7.7° less scapular internal rotation. In several other comparisons, the older group had significantly more shoulder complex motion than the younger participants. For hair combing, the older group had 14.6° more glenohumeral flexion. For washing the contralateral axilla, the older group demonstrated 7.8° more glenohumeral flexion and 13.0° more glenohumeral internal rotation. Overall, older and younger participants demonstrated significantly different shoulder joint complex kinematics. Age specific values should be considered when interacting with a patient presenting with shoulder dysfunction.     

Shoulder Kinematics of Axillary Web Syndrome in Women Treated for Breast Cancer

ObjectiveTo better understand how the shoulder moves in breast cancer survivors with axillary web syndrome (AWS), we compared 3-dimensional (3D) shoulder kinematics during shoulder elevation among breast cancer survivors with and without AWS 5 years postoperatively. Although research consistently shows decreased shoulder range of motion with AWS, we do not understand the underlying biomechanics.DesignNested case control study.SettingUniversity Academic Breast Center.ParticipantsTwenty-five women who had surgery 5 years previously for unilateral breast cancer with the removal of at least 1 lymph node participated in this study (N=25). Twelve participants had AWS; 13 women did not have AWS.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThree-dimensional shoulder kinematic data during shoulder forward flexion, scapular plane abduction, and coronal plane abduction were collected using 3D electromagnetic motion tracking. Kinematic data were extracted at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of arm elevation for scapular upward rotation, internal rotation, and posterior tilt as well as for glenohumeral external rotation.ResultsWomen with AWS demonstrated 15.2° less scapular upward rotation at 120° humerothoracic elevation (95% confidence interval [-25.2, -5.2], P=.005), regardless of plane. No significant between-group differences were found for any other angle of scapular upward rotation, nor for scapular internal rotation, scapular posterior tilt, or glenohumeral axial rotation at any angle.ConclusionsFive years after surgery for breast cancer, women diagnosed with AWS have altered scapulohumeral kinematics that may place them at an increased risk of shoulder pain based on existing kinematic literature in healthy cohorts. This information can help guide rehabilitation programs for breast cancer survivors to facilitate pain-free upper extremity function after treatment.     

In vivo measurement of distance between scapular neck and polyethylene insert during active external rotation in shoulders with Grammont type reverse prosthesis

BackgroundScapular notching is a frequently observed complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Impingement of the humeral plastic insert against the scapular neck is believed to be the cause of notching. There have been no in vivo studies that analyzed the positional relationship between the scapular neck and humeral insert. The purpose of this study was to measure the distance between the scapular neck and insert in shoulders with Grammont-type prostheses during active external rotation at the side.MethodsEighteen shoulders with Grammont-type prostheses were enrolled in this study. There were 13 males and 5 females, and the mean age at surgery was 74 years (range, 63–91). Fluoroscopic images were recorded during active external rotation at the side from maximum internal to external rotation at an average of 14 months (range, 7–24) after surgery. Implant kinematics were determined with three-dimensional models of the implants and fluoroscopic images using model-image registration techniques. Based on the implant kinematics, the closest distance between the scapular neck and insert was computed at each 5° increment of glenohumeral internal/external rotation.ResultsMean glenohumeral abduction during rotation was 17°–22°. The mean distance between the neck and insert was approximately 1 mm throughout the activity. The separation distance tended to narrow with arm external rotation, but the change was not significant.InterpretationThe small distance between the scapular neck and insert in early post-operative reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients may be associated with the high incidence of scapular notching in Grammont-type prostheses.     

Scapular asymmetry in participants with and without shoulder impingement syndrome; a three-dimensional motion analysis

BackgroundThis study analyzed the dynamic three-dimensional scapular kinematics and scapular asymmetry in participants with and without shoulder impingement syndrome.MethodsTwenty-nine participants with shoulder impingement syndrome, have been suffering from unilateral shoulder pain at the dominant arm lasting more than six weeks and thirty-seven healthy controls participated in the study. Scapular kinematics was measured with an electromagnetic tracking device during shoulder elevation in the sagittal plane. Data for bilateral scapular orientation were analyzed at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of humerothoracic elevation and lowering. The symmetry angle was calculated to quantify scapular asymmetry throughout shoulder elevation.FindingsStatistical comparisons indicated that the scapula was more downwardly rotated (p < 0.001) and anteriorly tilted (p = 0.005) in participants with shoulder impingement syndrome compared to healthy controls. Side-to-side comparisons revealed that the scapula was more anteriorly tilted on the involved side of participants with shoulder impingement syndrome (p = 0.01), and the scapula was rotated more internally (p = 0.02) and downwardly (p = 0.01) on the dominant side of healthy controls. Although there were side-to-side differences in both groups, symmetry angle calculation revealed that the scapular movement was more asymmetrical for scapular internal and upward rotation in individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome when compared with healthy controls (p < 0.05).InterpretationThe findings of the study increase our knowledge and understanding of scapular alterations in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations, which creates biomechanical considerations for shoulder assessment and rehabilitation.     

Comparing supraspinatus to acromion proximity and kinematics of the shoulder and thorax between manual wheelchair propulsion styles: A pilot study

BackgroundRepetitive glenohumeral joint movement during manual wheelchair propulsion has been associated with shoulder pain in individuals with spinal cord injury. Clinical guidelines for shoulder health maintenance encourage semi-circular over arc propulsion to reduce loading frequency. This study aimed to determine the difference in estimated supraspinatus to acromion compression risk, and shoulder, thorax kinematics between (1) arc and semi-circular propulsion; and (2) self-selected and coached strategies.MethodsShoulder and thorax kinematics were captured during wheelchair propulsion, noting individually self-selected styles. Participants were then coached to perform the other style(s) of interest, arc and/or semi-circular. CT bone models of the humerus and scapula were animated using glenohumeral kinematics to estimate the minimum distance between the supraspinatus humeral attachment and the acromion. Compression risk was defined as the proportion of each propulsion phase where the minimum distance fell below 5 mm. Comparisons were made between conditions evaluating compression risk, minimum distances and kinematics at events throughout propulsion.FindingsTen individuals with spinal cord injury (9 male) participated. Arc and semi-circular propulsion did not significantly differ in compression risk or minimum distance across propulsion phases. Self-selected styles yielded lower compression risk and larger proximity values compared to coached styles. Glenohumeral horizontal abduction and thorax flexion differed between arc and semi-circular propulsion. Multiple glenohumeral and humerothoracic differences emerged between self-selected and coached conditions.InterpretationSupraspinatus compression was observed during both arc and semi-circular propulsion, suggesting risk may be unavoidable in this task. Self-selected styles yield less risk, likely related to coached style unfamiliarity.     

Kinematic evaluation of patients with total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty during rehabilitation exercises with different loads

Background

Following shoulder arthroplasty, any well-planned rehabilitation program should include muscle strengthening. However, it is not always clear how different external loads influence shoulder kinematics in patients with shoulder prostheses. The objective of this study was to describe shoulder kinematics and determine the contribution of the scapulothoracic joint to total shoulder motion of patients with total and reverse shoulder arthroplasties and of healthy individuals during rehabilitation exercises (anteflexion and elevation in the scapular plane) using different loading conditions (without external load, 1 kg and elastic resistance).

Methods

Shoulder motions were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device. A force transducer was used to record force signals during loaded conditions using elastic resistance. Statistical comparisons were made using a three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post hoc testing.

Findings

The scapula contributed more to movement of the arm in subjects with prostheses compared to healthy subjects. The same applies for loaded conditions (1 kg and elastic resistance) relative to unloaded tasks. For scapular internal rotation, upward rotation and posterior tilt no significant differences among groups were found during both exercises. Glenohumeral elevation angles during anteflexion were significantly higher in the total shoulder arthroplasty group compared to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group.

Interpretation

Differences in contribution of the scapula to total shoulder motion between patients with different types of arthroplasties were not significant. However, compared to healthy subjects, they were. Furthermore, scapular kinematics of patients with shoulder arthroplasty was influenced by implementation of external loads, but not by the type of load.     

Coupling between 3D displacements and rotations at the glenohumeral joint during dynamic tasks in healthy participants

BackgroundGlenohumeral displacements assessment would help to design shoulder prostheses with physiological arthrokinematics and to establish more biofidelic musculoskeletal models. Though displacements were documented during static tasks, there is little information on their 3D coupling with glenohumeral angle during dynamic tasks. Our objective was to characterize the 3D glenohumeral displacement–rotation couplings during dynamic arm elevations and rotations.MethodsGlenohumeral displacements were measured from trajectories of reflective markers fitted on intracortical pins inserted into the scapula and humerus. Bone geometry was recorded using CT-scan. Only four participants were recruited to the experiment due to its invasiveness. Participants performed dynamic arm abduction, flexion and axial rotations. Linear regressions were performed between glenohumeral displacements and rotations. The pin of the scapula of one participant moved, his data were removed from analysis, and results are based on three participants.FindingsThe measurement error of glenohumeral kinematics was less than 0.15 mm and 0.2°. Maximum glenohumeral displacements were measured along the longitudinal direction and reached up to + 12.4 mm for one participant. Significant couplings were reported especially between longitudinal displacement and rotation in abduction (adjusted R² up to 0.94).InterpretationThe proposed method provides the potential to investigate glenohumeral kinematics during all kinds of movements. A linear increase of upward displacement during dynamic arm elevation was measured, which contrasts with results based on a series of static poses. The systematic investigation of glenohumeral displacements under dynamic condition may help to provide relevant recommendation for the design of shoulder prosthetic components and musculoskeletal models.     

Three-dimensional in vivo comparative analysis of the kinematics of normal shoulders and shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears with successful conservative treatment

BackgroundThis study used in vivo three-dimensional to two-dimensional image registration techniques to compare the glenohumeral kinematics of shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears that were successfully treated conservatively and those of normal shoulders.MethodsTen patients (age, 67.4 ± 3.63 years) with massive rotator cuff tears on one side and without contralateral tears were enrolled. We performed computed tomography and fluoroscopy on both shoulder joints and created three-dimensional bone models of the humerus and scapula using image registration techniques. We measured the humeral superoinferior translation, angle of humeral external rotation, scapular upward rotation, scapular anteroposterior tilt, and scapular external rotation of the torn shoulders with good range of motion after effective conservative treatment and compared these measurements to those of the contralateral normal shoulders.FindingsThere was a significant difference in the initial position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid in the tear group; it was 2.0 mm higher than that in the normal group (p < .05). This difference disappeared in the range from 40° to full elevation. The scapular motion of the tear group was significantly more upwardly rotated than that of the normal group: by 9.9° at rest (p < .05) and by 11.6° at terminal elevation (p < .05). No significant differences were detected for humeral head external rotation, scapular anteroposterior tilt, and scapular external rotation between the two groups.InterpretationKinematics of shoulders with massive cuff tears could not be recovered completely even though the patients had no significant symptoms after successful conservative treatment.     

Scapula kinematics and associated impingement risk in manual wheelchair users during propulsion and a weight relief lift

Background

Shoulder impingement syndrome is a common upper extremity pathology in manual wheelchair users. Central to impingement is the orientation of the scapula and humerus as they determine the available subacromial space. The purpose of this study was to examine the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral internal/external rotation kinematics during the time of peak shoulder loading of propulsion and weight relief lift conditions to assess possible risk of impingement.

Methods

Scapula, humerus and trunk kinematics were measured for twelve manual wheelchair users over three conditions: level propulsion, ramp propulsion, and a weight relief lift. Scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematic variables were characterized for the full cycle of each condition as well as at the period of peak loading.

Findings

Common to all activities was an externally rotated glenohumeral joint and an anteriorly tilted and internally rotated scapula. At peak loading, glenohumeral internal/external rotation showed a significant difference between conditions, and post hoc analysis revealed that the weight relief lift displayed significantly less external rotation at peak loading when compared to level and ramp propulsion.

Interpretation

All activities placed the scapula in a potentially dangerous orientation for development of shoulder impingement. The weight relief lift, with a decrease in glenohumeral external rotation and large superior forces at the shoulder, potentially places the shoulder of the manual wheelchair user at the greatest risk for impingement soft tissue injury. Preventative strength training and activity modification may provide measures to slow progression of impingement development and associated pain in the manual wheelchair user.     

Characteristics of the scapula movement during shoulder elevation depend on posture

[Purpose] This study aimed to clarify the differences in scapular movement during flexion and abduction of the shoulder joint with different postures. [Participants and Methods] This study included 15 male participants. Their shoulder flexion and abduction and angles of the scapular upward rotation, scapular anterior tilt, scapular external rotation, and thoracic spine flexion were measured. Measurements were taken in three positions: the control, thoracic spine flexion, and thoracic spine extension positions using a three-dimensional motion capture system. [Results] In the shoulder flexion, the amount of change in the scapular external rotation was significantly greater in the thoracic flexion than in the thoracic extension. In shoulder abduction, the amount of change in the scapular anterior tilt and external rotation was significantly greater in the thoracic flexion than in the thoracic extension. A comparison of the scapular angles in shoulder flexion and abduction showed that the upward rotation, posterior tilt, and external rotation were significantly greater in abduction than flexion. [Conclusion] To avoid posture-induced incoordination of the scapula and thorax movement during shoulder elevation, postural adjustment of the thoracic spine based on the movements is necessary for the shoulder joint exercises.     

Scapular muscle imbalance: implications for shoulder pain and pathology

Abstract

Background: The scapula is important for normal shoulder function. The correct length, strength, and sequence of recruitment of the scapulothoracic muscles are important in controlling the movement of the scapula which must maintain an optimal position in relation to the elevating humerus. Changes in the action of scapulothoracic muscles may potentially affect alignment and forces and may contribute to glenohumeral joint pathology.

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to review the literature that associates abnormal scapulothoracic muscle function with shoulder joint pain and pathology.

Major findings: Shoulder impingement syndrome, superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions and multidirectional instability have all been associated with dysfunctional movement patterns of the scapula. It is not clear if the observed changes in scapular movements and muscular control are the result of or are the cause of these various pathologies at the shoulder joint. Alterations in the force production of the scapulothoracic musculature including all parts of the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles have been reported. Tightness in the pectoralis minor and/or in the posterior glenohumeral joint capsule may also affect movement due to a general anterior tilting of the scapula which impairs its ability to attain a normally upwardly rotated position.

Conclusions: The results of the investigations reviewed imply that appropriate assessment of the length, strength, and activation of all parts of the upper trapezius, serratus anterior, and pectoralis minor are important in the rehabilitation of patients with glenohumeral joint pathology.     

Scapular dyskinesis type is associated with glenohumeral joint and scapular kinematic alteration during pitching motion in baseball players

IntroductionScapular dyskinesis (SD) is associated with an increased risk of throwing-related shoulder injury onset, resulting in abnormalities in glenohumeral joint (GH) and scapular motions during pitching. The effects of SD on shoulder motion during pitching remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate kinematic alterations in GH and scapular motions during pitching in baseball players with type I SD.MethodsSixty-seven university and independent-league baseball players with and without SD were included. Pitching motion was measured using an optical three-dimensional motion capture system, and a SD test was conducted to evaluate SD. SD was classified into types I–IV. The inter-rater reliability of SD assessment was calculated using kappa coefficients. Three-dimensional GH and scapular kinematics during pitching motion were analyzed.ResultsThe percentage of agreement representing the inter-rater reliability of SD assessment was 77.6% (52/67; kappa coefficient: 0.72). Overall, 24 and 27 participants were categorized into abnormal (type I SD) and normal group (type IV SD), respectively, with normal scapular motion; one individual with type III SD was excluded. The abnormal group exhibited a significantly increased GH external rotation angle (9°) and decreased scapular posterior tilt angle (6°) during the maximum external rotation period compared with the normal group.ConclusionsBaseball players in the abnormal group showed increased GH motion and decreased scapular motion during pitching. The SD test for the evaluation of type I SD can help predict excessive GH external rotation and decreased scapular posterior tilt during pitching.     

Stretching and strengthening exercises: their effect on three-dimensional scapular kinematics.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate the effects of commonly used shoulder exercises on shoulder kinematics and resting posture. STUDY DESIGN: A repeated-measures design was used with measurements performed before and after a 6-week exercise program. METHOD: Twenty asymptomatic subjects with forward shoulder posture were recruited. Stretching exercises for the pectoral muscles and resisted strengthening exercises for the scapular retractors and elevators and the glenohumeral abductors and external rotators were performed three times per week for 6 weeks. A three-dimensional electromechanical digitizer was used to measure thoracic inclination and scapular orientation and position. These measurements were taken with the arm (1) at the side, (2) abducted to 90 degrees, and (3) at maximal abduction. The isometric force of glenohumeral external and internal rotation and horizontal abduction and adduction were measured with a hand-held dynamometer. All subjects were tested before and after the 6-week exercise program. Hotelling's T2 and paired t tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The strength of horizontal abduction and internal and external rotation increased after exercise (p < .01). The anterior inclination of the thoracic spine decreased, and the glenohumeral contribution to arm elevation increased (p < .01). Resting scapular posture did not change. As the arm was abducted to 90 degrees, the scapula showed less upward rotation and less superior translation after the exercise program (p < .01). CONCLUSION: The exercise program improved muscle strength, produced a more erect upper trunk posture, increased scapular stability, and altered scapulohumeral rhythm.     

Kinematics and muscle activation in subacromial pain syndrome patients and asymptomatic controls

BackgroundConflicting theories exist about the underlying cause of chronic subacromial pain in the middle-aged population. We aim to improve our understanding of kinematics and muscle activation in subacromial pain syndrome to provide insight in its pathophysiology.MethodsIn a cross-sectional comparison of 40 patients with subacromial pain syndrome and 30 asymptomatic controls, three-dimensional shoulder kinematics and electromyography-based co-contraction in 10 shoulder muscles were independently recorded. Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic kinematics were evaluated during abduction and forward flexion. Co-contraction was expressed as an activation ratio, specifying the relative agonistic and antagonistic muscle activity in each muscle.FindingsDuring abduction and forward flexion, the contribution of glenohumeral motion to elevation and glenohumeral external rotation was lower in subacromial pain syndrome (at 120⁰ abduction: −9°, 95% CI -14°- -3°; and − 8°, 95% CI -13°--3°, respectively), and was compensated by more scapulothoracic motion. The pectoralis major's activation ratio was significantly lower (Z-score: -2.657, P = 0.008) and teres major's activation ratio significantly higher (Z-score: -4.088, P < 0.001) in patients with subacromial pain syndrome compared to the control group.InterpretationReduced glenohumeral elevation and external rotation in subacromial pain syndrome coincided with less teres major antagonistic activity during elevation. These biomechanical findings provide a scientific basis for intervention studies directed at stretching exercises to reduce glenohumeral stiffness in the treatment of subacromial pain syndrome, and teres major strengthening to improve humeral head depressor function.     

The effect of a rotator cuff tear and its size on three-dimensional shoulder motion

BackgroundRotator cuff-disease is associated with changes in kinematics, but the effect of a rotator cuff-tear and its size on shoulder kinematics is still unknown in-vivo.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, glenohumeral and scapulothoracic kinematics of the affected shoulder were evaluated using electromagnetic motion analysis in 109 patients with 1) subacromial pain syndrome (n = 34), 2) an isolated supraspinatus tear (n = 21), and 3) a massive rotator cuff tear involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus (n = 54). Mixed models were applied for the comparisons of shoulder kinematics between the three groups during abduction and forward flexion.FindingsIn the massive rotator cuff-tear group, we found reduced glenohumeral elevation compared to the subacromial pain syndrome (16°, 95% CI [10.5, 21.2], p < 0.001) and the isolated supraspinatus tear group (10°, 95% CI [4.0, 16.7], p = 0.002) at 110° abduction. Reduced glenohumeral elevation in massive rotator cuff tears coincides with an increase in scapulothoracic lateral rotation compared to subacromial pain syndrome (11°, 95% CI [6.5, 15.2], p < 0.001) and supraspinatus tears (7°, 95% CI [1.8, 12.1], p = 0.012). Comparable differences were observed for forward flexion. No differences in glenohumeral elevation were found between the subacromial pain syndrome and isolated supraspinatus tear group during arm elevation.InterpretationThe massive posterosuperior rotator cuff-tear group had substantially less glenohumeral elevation and more scapulothoracic lateral rotation compared to the other groups. These observations suggest that the infraspinatus is essential to preserve glenohumeral elevation in the presence of a supraspinatus tear. Shoulder kinematics are associated with rotator cuff-tear size and may have diagnostic potential.     

Analyzing glenohumeral torque–rotation response in vivo

BackgroundBecause the human shoulder has many degrees of freedom that allow redundant means of producing the same net humerothoracic motion, there are many impediments to objective, repeatable assessment of shoulder function in vivo. Devices designed to date have suffered from poor reliability. In this study we introduce a new device and methods to evaluate human shoulder kinematics and evaluate its reproducibility from subject to subject and from day to day.MethodsThis was a controlled laboratory study. Using electromagnetic motion sensors to record the position and orientation of the thorax, scapula, and humerus, we quantified the kinematic response of twenty four normal shoulders in response to known internal–external torque application. A four-parameter logistic function was selected to characterize the strident features of the torque–rotation relationship.FindingsOur analysis in conjunction with the measurement technique described herein, allowed the passive glenohumeral internal–external range of motion to be differentiated from other motion components and was determined to within 9.6% of full scale over three repeated trials. Range of motion was the most reliable biomechanical outcome, more so than computed indices of glenohumeral flexibility and hysteresis. The exact profile of the torque–rotation response, and therefore the repeatability of the calculated outcomes, was unique from shoulder to shoulder.InterpretationThe development of the capacity for precise, non-invasive measurement of shoulder biomechanics over time is a requisite step towards optimizing treatment of shoulder injury and disease. Our current methods are superior to previous attempts at trying to non-invasively evaluate the biomechanics of the glenohumeral joint.     

Shoulder mechanical impingement risk associated with manual wheelchair tasks in individuals with spinal cord injury

BackgroundMost individuals with spinal cord injury who use manual wheelchairs experience shoulder pain related to wheelchair use, potentially in part from mechanical impingement of soft tissue structures within the subacromial space. There is evidence suggesting that scapula and humerus motion during certain wheelchair tasks occurs in directions that may reduce the subacromial space, but it hasn't been thoroughly characterized in this context.MethodsShoulder motion was imaged and quantified during scapular plane elevation with/without handheld load, propulsion with/without added resistance, sideways lean, and weight-relief raise in ten manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury using biplane fluoroscopy and computed tomography. For each position, minimum distance between rotator cuff tendon insertions (infraspinatus, subscapularis, supraspinatus) and the coracoacromial arch was determined. Tendon thickness was measured with ultrasound, and impingement risk scores were defined for each task based on frequency and amount of tendon compression.FindingsPeriods of impingement were identified during scapular plane elevation and propulsion but not during pressure reliefs in most participants. There was a significant effect of activity on impingement risk scores (P < 0.0001), with greatest impingement risk during scapular plane elevation followed by propulsion. Impingement risk scores were not significantly different between scapular plane elevation loading conditions (P = 0.202) or propulsion resistances (P = 0.223). The infraspinatus and supraspinatus tendons were both susceptible to impingement during scapular plane elevation (by acromion), whereas the supraspinatus was most susceptible during propulsion (by acromion and coracoacromial ligament).InterpretationThe occurrence of mechanical impingement during certain manual wheelchair tasks, even without increased load/resistance, demonstrates the importance of kinematics inherent to a task as a determinant of impingement. Frequency of and technique used to complete daily tasks should be carefully considered to reduce impingement risk, which may help preserve shoulder health long-term.