Isolated free fluid on computed tomographic scan in blunt abdominal trauma: a systematic review of incidence and management

BACKGROUND: Abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan is accepted as the primary diagnostic modality in stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. A recent survey of 328 trauma surgeons demonstrated marked variation in the management of patients with head injuries and the finding of free intra-abdominal fluid without solid organ injury on CT scan. This study was undertaken to attempt to determine what to do when free fluid without solid organ injury is seen on abdominal CT scan in patients with blunt trauma. METHODS: Articles concerning the incidence and significance of free intra-abdominal fluid on CT scan of blunt trauma patients without solid organ injury were systematically reviewed. A MEDLINE search was performed using terms such as tomography-x-ray computed, wounds-nonpenetrating, small intestine/injuries, time factors, and abdominal trauma and diagnostic tests. Bibliographies of pertinent articles were reviewed. Appropriate articles were evaluated for quality and data were combined to reach a conclusion. RESULTS: Meta-analysis could not be performed because no randomized, prospective, controlled trials could be found. Forty-one articles were excluded from the analysis because they looked at only patients with known injuries to intestine, diaphragm, or pancreas and the investigation of the CT scan findings did not include negative scans. Ten articles, which described CT scan results for all patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma for a defined period of time, formed the basis of this study. Isolated free fluid was seen in 463 (2.8%) of over 16,000 blunt trauma patients scanned. A therapeutic laparotomy was performed in only 122 (27%) of these patients. CONCLUSION: The isolated finding of free intra-abdominal fluid on CT scan in patients with blunt trauma and no solid organ injury does not warrant laparotomy. Alert patients may be followed with physical examination. Patients with altered mental status should undergo diagnostic peritoneal lavage.     

Diagnostic accuracy of surgeon-performed focused abdominal sonography (FAST) in blunt paediatric trauma

AIM: To study the diagnostic accuracy and clinical efficacy of surgeon-performed focused abdominal sonography (FAST) in paediatric blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). MATERIALS AND METHOD: This was a prospective, single blinded study conducted at The Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney (CHW). All patients with BAT that justified a trauma call activated on presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) had a FAST performed by the Trauma Fellow. The attending surgical team was blinded to the result of the FAST. An independent radiologist reviewed the FAST pictures, and the findings were compared with computerised tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), laparotomy and the clinical outcome of the patient. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (39 M; 26 F) were enrolled in the study between February 2002 and January 2003. The age ranged between 4 months and 16 years. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 6 (range 1-38). FAST was performed in a mean time of 3 min. Inter-rater agreement was 96%. FAST was positive in nine as confirmed by a CT scan of the abdomen. Three patients underwent laparotomy, two for bowel injuries and one for a Grade III liver laceration. Of the remaining 76, 19 had a CT, which showed evidence of intra-abdominal injury in seven patients. There were two false negative studies resulting in a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 100%, negative predictive value of 97%, positive predictive value of 100% and an accuracy of 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon-performed FAST for BAT was safe and accurate with a high specificity. It would seem a potentially valuable tool in the evaluation of paediatric blunt trauma victims for free fluid within the peritoneal cavity.     

急诊床旁超声在腹部损伤中的应用价值

目的 了解急诊床旁超声在腹部闭合性损伤中的应用价值.方法 回顾性分析67例腹部闭合性创伤超声影像资料.结果 所有患者行急诊床旁超声检查,诊断符合率分别为:肝损伤92%,脾损伤93%,肾损伤80%,胰腺损伤50%,空腔脏器损伤67%,肠系膜血管损伤100%,腹膜后血肿100%.结论 急诊床旁超声是诊断腹部创伤致内脏破裂出...     

Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury does not mandate celiotomy

BACKGROUND: Mandatory celiotomy has been proposed for all patients with unexplained free fluid on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning after blunt abdominal injury. This recommendation has been based upon retrospective data and concerns over the potential morbidity from the late diagnosis of blunt intestinal injury. This study examined the rate of intestinal injury in patients with free fluid on abdominal CT after blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: This study was a multicenter prospective series of all patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to four level I trauma centers over 22 months. Data were collected concurrently at the time of patient enrollment and included demographics, injury severity score, findings on CT scan, and presence or absence of blunt intestinal injury. This database was specifically queried for those patients who had free fluid without solid organ injury. RESULTS: In all, 2,299 patients were evaluated. Free fluid was present in 265. Of these, 90 patients had isolated free fluid with only 7 having a blunt intestinal injury. Conversely, 91% of patients with free fluid did not. All patients with free fluid were observed for a mean of 8 days (95% confidence interval 6.1 to 10.4, range 1 to 131). There were no missed injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Free fluid on abdominal CT scan does not mandate celiotomy. Serial observation with the possible use of other adjunctive tests is recommended.     

Laparoscopy in abdominal trauma. Preliminary report in 37 cases

The role of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) and therapeutic laparoscopy (TL) in abdominal trauma is not clear. Even after diagnostic punction lavage (DPL), ultrasonography (US), and CT scan (CT), in some cases is difficult to decide between laparotomy and observation. In 37 cases of abdominal trauma, a laparoscopic evaluation was done; 28 abdominal blunt trauma (22 associated with multiple trauma), and 9 abdominal wounds (8 stab wounds). In blunt abdominal trauma, DL was done for haemoperitoneum (26 cases), after DPL, US or CT. In three cases, with equivocal diagnosis, an extra abdominal operation in general anaesthesia was necessary. In abdominal wounds a DL was done for suspicion of penetration. All the patients were haemodynamic stable, TS > or = 12. A laparotomy was necessary in 12 cases (32.43%), a LT was possible in 5 cases (13.51%). In the rest of cases, a DL with or without lavage-drenage enough.     

Computed tomography in the evaluation of children with blunt abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT in pediatric patients with blunt trauma. Correlation of the CT-identified injuries and intraoperative findings with comparison to the results of DPL was performed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical evaluation frequently is unreliable in determining the presence of intra-abdominal injury in children with blunt trauma. Peritoneal lavage has been used to establish the need for operative intervention and has been found to be safe, efficient, and reliable (98%). In many institutions, abdominal CT scans are used to evaluate these children. Because most reports involve nonoperative management, operative confirmation of CT-identified injuries is available only for those children in whom nonoperative treatment is unsuccessful. METHODS: Sixty children sustaining blunt abdominal trauma were included in the study. CT scans with both oral and IV contrast were performed before open lavage, and positive results were confirmed by operation in 18 patients. RESULTS: CT had a sensitivity of 67%, however, only 60% of the actual organ injuries were identified by the scan. In contrast, DPL has a sensitivity of 94%. Both studies were equally specific (100%). DPL was also more accurate, 98% as compared with 89% for CT. CONCLUSIONS: Although the abdominal CT scan is useful in evaluating children with blunt abdominal trauma, a number of significant injuries were missed. Based on the low sensitivity of the CT, the authors suggest diagnostic peritoneal lavage may offer advantages over CT as the initial study in the evaluation of children with blunt abdominal trauma.     

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CT scan with oral and intravenous contrast versus CT scan with intravenous contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma

PurposeAbdominal CT scan using oral and intravenous (IV) contrast is helpful in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries. However, the use of oral and IV contrast delays the process of diagnosis and increases the risk of aspiration. It has also been shown that CT scan with IV contrast alone is as helpful as CT scan with oral and IV contrast and rectal CT scan in detecting abdominal injuries. Therefore, the present study aims to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of CT scan with oral and IV contrast versus CT scan with IV contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).MethodsAltogether 123 BAT patients, 60 (48.8%) women and 63 (51.2%) men with the mean age of (40.4 ± 18.7) years who referred to the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Educational and Medical Center in Sari, Iran (a tertiary trauma center in north of Iran) from November 2014 to March 2017 and underwent abdominal CT scans + laparotomy were investigated. Those with penetrating trauma or hemodynamically unstable patients were excluded. The participants were randomly allocated to two groups: abdominal CT scan with oral and IV contrast (n = 63) and CT scan with IV contrast alone (n = 60). No statistically significant difference was found between two groups regarding the hemodynamic parameters, age, gender, injury mechanisms (all p > 0.05). The results of CT scan were compared with that of laparotomy results. The collected data were recorded in SPSS version 22.0 for Windows. Quantitative data were presented as mean and SD.ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of CT scan using oral and IV contrast in the diagnosis of BAT were estimated at 96.48 (95% CI: 90.73 – 99.92) and 92.67 (95% CI: 89.65 – 94.88), respectively; while CT scan with IV contrast alone achieved a comparable sensitivity and specificity of 96.6 (95% CI: 87.45 – 99,42 and 92.84 (95% CI: 89.88 – 95.00), respectively.ConclusionCT scan with IV contrast alone can be used to assess visceral injuries in BAT patients with normal hemodynamics to avoid diagnostic delay.     

Management of kidney injuries in children with blunt abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The authors analyzed the incidence and the course of renal injuries encountered in a cohort of pediatric patients with blunt abdominal trauma. This review focuses on the early diagnostic and therapeutic approach rather than the long-term outcome and draws conclusions for an effective initial management. METHODS: From 1976 to 1996, the charts of 308 children with blunt abdominal trauma that were admitted to the authors' department were reviewed. The patients initially were evaluated using urinalysis, ultrasonography, and abdominal paracentesis (until 1984) and in specific cases iv-urography, computed tomography (CT), and angiography. The authors retrospectively classified the renal trauma after the widely used Organ Injury Scaling (OIS) into 5 grades and correlated the diagnostic value of various techniques as well as the diagnostic approach. RESULTS: Sixty-nine serious abdominal traumas were encountered. Thirty-six patients suffered renal lesions grade 2 (G2) or higher; 20 children were polytraumatized. There were 67 renal lesions including 28 G1, 22 G2, 8 G3, 5 G4, 1 G5, and 3 lesions of the lower urinary tract. Ultrasonography and urinalysis were found to be the optimal diagnostic methods for screening and following the course of renal injury. CT scan proved to be most reliable for detecting and exactly classifying renal lesions grade 2 or higher and superseded consecutively iv-urography. In cases in which CT scan failed to show renal excretion of contrast agent, angiography was performed. Ten patients proceeded to operative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography and urinalysis proved to be the optimal initial evaluation tool for excluding renal injury both as a screening method and for further controls. Exact classification was possible by CT scan. During the reviewed time period a shift from surgical to conservative management was notable. If lesions were G4 or G5, surgical treatment with tendency toward minimally invasive therapy always was indicated.     

Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan in abdominal blunt trauma

Obiective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CT scan findings in Patients ith blunt abdominal trauma admitted to the university hospital.Methods: All the atients ith blunt abdominal trauma admitted at a tertiary teaching trauma center in Iran between 2005 and 2007 were enrolled in this study.In the absence of any clinical anifestations,he patients underwent a diagnostic CT scan.Laparatomy was performed in those with positive CT results.Others were observed for 48 hours and discharged in case no problem as reported;otherwise they underwent laparatomy.Information on patients'demographic ata,mechanism of trauma,indication for CT scan,CT scan findings,results of laparotomy ere gathered.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the CT-scan images in regard ith the organ injured were calculated.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the T scan were calculated in each case.Results: CT Scan had the highest sensitivity for etecting the injuries to liver (100%) and spleen (86.6%).The specificity of the method or detecting retroperitoneal hematoma (100%) and injuries to kidney (93.5%) was higher han other organs.The accuracy of CT images to detect the injuries to spleen,liver,idney and retroperitoneal hematoma was reported to be 96.1%,94.4%,91.6% and 91.6% espectively.Conclusion: The findings of the present study reveal that CT scan could econsidered as a good choice,especially for patients with blunt abdominal trauma in eaching hospitals where the radiologic academic staff is not present in the hospital in the night shifts.     

The utility of focused abdominal ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma: a reappraisal

BACKGROUND: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) has become commonplace in the management of blunt abdominal trauma. However, newer computed tomography (CT) scanners have decreased imaging time for trauma patients and provide more detailed examination of abdominal contents. It was the aim of the current study to evaluate practice patterns of FAST and abdominal CT in blunt trauma victims. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all blunt trauma patients (N = 299) who received at least 1 FAST examination in the emergency department by surgeons and were admitted. Patients were tracked for subsequent CT scanning, disposition from the emergency department, any operative findings, and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 299 patients (7%) had a positive FAST. There were 7 deaths and 14 patients were taken directly to the operating room (OR) for control of abdominal bleeding. Thirty-one of 299 (10%) had equivocal FAST. There were 4 deaths and 8 patients were taken to the OR for control of abdominal bleeding. A total of 247 of the 299 patients had a negative FAST. CT scans were performed in 193: 15 showed a visceral injury. There were 13 deaths and 29 patients were taken to the OR (4 for bleeding). Patients with a positive FAST had a higher mortality than FAST-negative patients (P < .001) and greater likelihood for operation (P < .001). Those with equivocal FAST had a greater likelihood for operation than FAST-negative patients (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: FAST examinations can identify patients at risk for hemorrhage and in whom operation may be needed and, therefore, can guide mobilization of hospital resources. FAST-negative patients can be managed expectantly, using more specific imaging techniques.     

Defining the role of computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma: use in the hemodynamically stable patient with a depressed level of consciousness

HYPOTHESIS: Controversy exists regarding the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) vs computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. It has been suggested that one role for DPL is to diagnose bowel injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with an unreliable abdominal examination result. Our hypothesis is that CT is specific and sensitive for diagnosing hollow viscus injuries and is therefore an appropriate diagnostic modality in the hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patient with an unreliable abdominal examination result due to a depressed level of consciousness. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case review. SETTING: An urban level II trauma center. PATIENTS: The medical records of 1388 consecutive patients admitted between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included blunt trauma patients who were hemodynamically stable (defined as a systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg) with unreliable abdominal examination results secondary to a depressed level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale score <11). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hollow viscus injury diagnosed by CT and missed diagnosis of hollow viscus injury by CT. RESULTS: Of 1388 patients who met entry criteria, 87 had hollow viscus injuries; CT identified 85 of these injuries. Computed tomography diagnosed intestinal injury with a sensitivity of 97.7%, specificity of 98.5%, and an overall accuracy of 99.4%. CONCLUSION: At our institution, CT is a reliable and accurate diagnostic modality when used to evaluate hollow viscus injuries in the hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patient with an unreliable abdominal examination result due to a depressed level of consciousness.     

闭合性腹部损伤的首诊处理

目的　总结闭合性腹部损伤 (Bluntabdominalinjury ,BAI)的首诊处理经验。 方法　对我院急诊处置的 2 5 7例BAI患者 ,进行回顾性总结。结果　腹腔穿刺、B型超声和CT诊断阳性率分别为 91.4 %、92 .2 %、85 .4 % ;抢救无效死亡 19例 ,直接送手术室行剖腹探查术 2 1例 ,收住院治疗 182例 ,门诊观察 18例 ,对症处理 17例。结论　对危重患者做到边抢救边诊断或先抢救后诊断 ,诊断性腹腔穿刺、B型超声和CT是BAI可靠的诊断手段。应根据病情严重程度不同 ,决定BAI患者的后续处理     

腹部创伤定点超声检查在急诊腹部闭合性创伤的应用

目的总结腹部创伤定点超声（focussedassessmentsonographtrauma,FAST）检查在急诊科的应用价值。方法对76例腹部闭合性创伤的患者进行FAST检查,与腹部CT或手术探查结果进行比较,评价FAST检查对腹部闭合性创伤患者的快速诊断效能。结果FAST的敏感性90．7％,特异性69．7％,阳性预测值79．6％,阴性预测值85．2％,假阳性率30．3％,假阴性率9．3％,准确性81．6％。FAST检查平均用时（3．5±1．3）min,远优于CT检查的（29．1±12．5）min。两者差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论FAST检查法对腹部闭合性创伤患者具有快速评价诊断效能,可作为急诊医生判断腹部外伤患者是否存在腹部损伤的初步检查方法。     

The complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

To determine the roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma, we compared our results in the eras before and after the advent of abdominal CT. In the pre-CT era 1977 to 1980 (group 1; 365 patients), DPL was the diagnostic procedure of choice. In the CT era 1983 to 1986 (group 2; 282 patients), DPL was used for unstable, polytraumatized patients, and CT was reserved for stable patients. The rate of delayed recognition of documented visceral injury (7%) was similar for groups 1 and 2. Celiotomy was nontherapeutic in 21 (14%) patients in group 1 and in 5 (5%) in group 2 (p less than 0.02). Despite immediate availability of abdominal CT, clinical examination alone or in combination with DPL was the diagnostic procedure of choice in 41% of those with blunt abdominal trauma in group 2. The complementary use of abdominal CT and DPL in those with blunt abdominal trauma decreased the rate of nontherapeutic celiotomy, did not result in a significant increase in missed injuries, and allowed identification of candidates for nonoperative management of solid organ injury.     

Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma occurring during pregnancy

Evaluation of abdominal trauma in pregnant patients presents a number of dilemmas. Few series compare the various modalities available in this situation. The present review characterizes various techniques and their results. The charts of all patients with a secondary diagnosis of pregnancy admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 7 1/2-year period were reviewed. Forty were considered to have sustained possible blunt abdominal trauma: 30 were occupants in motor vehicle collisions, five were pedestrians, four sustained falls, and one was riding a motorcycle. Immediate laparotomy for emergency caesarean section or other indications was performed in three cases (7%). In 13 cases (32%) evaluation was accomplished by diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL). Three patients (7%) underwent computerized tomography of the abdomen. The remaining 22 patients (55%) were observed with serial physical exams, and hematocrits. The group that was observed had a mean ISS of 5.9. The mean Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was 14.9. No patients had to undergo exploratory laparotomy for abdominal injury during hospitalization. In the 13 patients undergoing DPL, the mean ISS was 34.6, and the mean GCS was 10.6. Overall accuracy was 92% with no major complications. Pregnant patients sustaining minor injuries and blunt abdominal trauma may be safely observed. Those with major injuries, shock, altered mental status, or neurologic deficit require further studies to rule out intra-abdominal injury. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage proved to be safe and accurate in these patients. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage proved to be safe and accurate in these patients. CT scan and ultrasonography are other modalities which merit further assessment as a primary diagnostic technique in abdominal trauma occurring during pregnancy.     

Ultrasonographic diagnosis of abdominal free fluid: accuracy comparison of emergency physicians and radiologists

Objective

Blunt abdominal trauma is a diagnostic challenge for emergency physicians and ultrasonography is one of the diagnostic tools used in this type of injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonographies performed by emergency physicians and radiologists.

Methods

This prospective diagnostic study was performed in the emergency departments of two trauma centers in Iran during a period of 12 months. The subjects were all patients with blunt abdominal trauma that were candidated for abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scanning in our emergency departments. The results of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) performed by emergency physicians and radiologists were compared blindly with the results of CT scans performed by radiologists. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of diagnosis for different abdominal anatomic areas were calculated.

Results

In total, 450 patients undergoing FAST and CT scanning were studied. The sensitivity of radiologists’ diagnoses for Morison’s, splenorenal, perivesical, and pleural effusion areas were, respectively, 88.0, 70.0, 38.0, and 30.0 %. The corresponding values for emergency physicians’ diagnoses were, respectively, 82.0, 60.0, 28.0, and 30.0 %. The specificity of radiologists’ diagnoses in the mentioned areas were, respectively, 98.9, 100, 93.1, and 100 %, and for emergency physicians, they were, respectively, 98.9, 100, 96.0, and 100 %.

Conclusion

Emergency physicians showed a promising performance in applying FAST in blunt abdominal trauma. The specificity of ultrasonographic diagnosis in the emergency physicians group and the radiologists group were comparable, while radiologists showed a higher performance regarding the sensitivity of the ultrasonographic diagnosis.     

Computed tomography and nonoperative treatment for blunt abdominal trauma

Studies were undertaken to determine if computed tomography (CT) could reliably assist physical examination in the initial assessment of blunt abdominal trauma, and also to examine how various abdominal injuries were managed with the guidance of CT. A total of 255 patients underwent emergency abdominal CT following blunt abdominal trauma over a period of seven years. One hundred and fifty two patients had abnormal CT scans, including 58 hepatic, 36 renal, 25 splenic and 9 pancreatic injuries as well as 67 patients with intra-abdominal hemorrhage and 21 patients with free abdominal air. A comparative study on the detection of pneumoperitoneum revealed CT to be far superior to plain radiography. One hundred and three patients had normal CT scans, all of whom were managed nonoperatively, except for three false-negative cases and two nontherapeutic cases. The patients with injury to the parenchymal organs were given nonoperative treatment if they had stable vital signs and no evidence of associated injuries demanding immediate surgery and the majority of these patients were managed well nonoperatively. CT was thus found to be a useful adjunct in the management of victims of blunt abdominal trauma, since in a rapid and noninvasive fashion, CT accurately defined the extent of parenchymal organ injury and also disclosed any other abdominal injuries.     

Accuracy of physical and ultrasonographic examinations by emergency physicians for the early diagnosis of intraabdominal haemorrhage in blunt abdominal trauma

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of physical examination and ultrasonographic evaluation performed by emergency physicians in cases of blunt abdominal trauma for the early diagnosis of intraabdominal haemorrhage. METHODS: In this clinical prospective study, trauma patients were evaluated with four-quadrant ultrasonography by emergency physicians after initial stabilisation and physical examination. Diagnoses based on demographic data, physical examination and emergency physician's ultrasonography were compared with the subsequent clinical course. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients participated in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of emergency physician's ultrasonographic examination to detect intraabdominal haemorrhage were 86 and 99%, respectively. Pre-test sensitivity and specificity of physical examination to detect intraabdominal haemorrhage were 39 and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination was not a reliable method to detect intraabdominal haemorrhage in cases of blunt abdominal trauma. In contrast, abdominal ultrasonography performed by emergency physicians was a reliable diagnostic tool. Emergency physicians should be familiar with abdominal ultrasonographic examination, which should be routine in cases of blunt abdominal trauma.     

Screening for abdominal injury prior to emergent extra-abdominal trauma surgery: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the necessity of abdominal screening with computed tomography (CT) in awake and alert blunt trauma patients that require emergent extra-abdominal trauma surgery. METHODS: All blunt trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center that required emergent extra-abdominal trauma surgery were entered in a prospective study during the period from April 2001 to June 2003. Awake and alert blunt trauma patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score > or =14) with a normal abdominal physical examination requiring extra-abdominal emergent surgery were entered in the study. All patients entered were greater than 14 years of age, hemodynamically stable, and underwent further abdominal evaluation with CT scan following the decision for extra-abdominal surgical intervention. Emergent extra-abdominal trauma surgery occurred within 8 hours of emergency room admission. The results of all diagnostic studies, hemodynamic values, mechanism of injury indications for extra-abdominal surgical intervention and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients were entered in the study with average age of 32 years (range: 14-81). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash (76%). One hundred forty-three (88%) patients presented with GCS scores of 15, and 19 (12%) patients presented with GCS scores of 14. The majority of extra-abdominal emergent surgical procedures were orthopedic (88%). Two (1.2%) intra-peritoneal injuries were diagnosed in the study population. One of the injuries was a stable Grade 1 splenic injury and the other was a small bowel mesenteric hematoma. Neither of the 2 abdominal missed injury required blood transfusion or surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Before emergent extra-abdominal trauma surgery, abdominal evaluation with physical examination is sufficient to identify surgically significant abdominal injury in the awake and alert blunt trauma patient. Abdominal screening with computed tomography does not impact patient outcome.     

Traumatic `degloving' of the colon in blunt abdominal injury

We describe two cases of traumatic `degloving' of the colon in blunt abdominal trauma. This is an extremely rare injury with the potential to present late. The mechanism of injury appears to be a combination of focal blunt abdominal trauma associated with a shearing force. The potential diagnostic dilemma posed by colonic `degloving' is outlined and following review of the literature we conclude that CT scanning is the most reliable way of detecting such injuries, if emergency laparotomy is not indicated.