Amelioration of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in cyclosporine-treated patients by addition of azathioprine

Management of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients remains problematic. We therefore initiated a protocol of azathioprine addition (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day) to ongoing CsA/Pred therapy. Three groups were treated. Group A (n = 21) had chronic progressive renal dysfunction (serum creatinine greater than or equal to 2.5 mg/dl or more than 15% above baseline) four or more months after transplantation. Group B (n = 8) had frequent or severe rejection episodes occurring despite adequate CsA levels. Group C (n = 7) had constitutional side effects of CsA with or without renal dysfunction persisting despite drug taper or financial difficulty in affording CsA. Aza was initiated 17.8 +/- 2.8 months after transplantation in group A, the mean serum creatinine having risen from 2.55 +/- 27 mg/dl to 3.04 +/- .20 mg/dl (P = .07) over the six months preceding Aza initiation, despite stable and low therapeutic range HPLC whole-blood CsA levels (118 +/- 10 ng/ml vs. 133 +/- 11 ng/ml, P = NS). Renal function declined at a rate of -0.20 +/- .06 Cr1/year in the six-month period before addition of Aza, and then improved at a rate of 0.09 +/- .04 Cr-1/year after addition of Aza (P = .002). These changes in renal function occurred without a decrease in CsA levels (118 +/- 10 six months before Aza vs. 126 +/- 26 six months after Aza, P = NS). In group B Aza was initiated at 58 +/- 8 days after transplantation when mean sCr was 3.56 +/- .29 mg/dl and mean CsA level was 222 +/- 17 ng/ml. At least follow-up 12.7 +/- 2.0 months after addition of Aza, all group B grafts were functioning, mean sCr was 2.69 +/- .31 mg/dl (P = .09 compared with baseline), and mean CsA level was 128 +/- 34 ng/ml (P = .07 compared with baseline). Group C patients had addition of Aza at 43 +/- 19 months after transplantation when mean sCr was 2.97 +/- .60 and mean CsA level was 125 +/- 30 ng/ml; addition of Aza had no influence on the rate of decline in renal function in this group. Of these 36 patients, 6 received therapy for acute rejection over the entire follow-up period of 12.3 +/- 1.4 months after addition of Aza; 4 of these retain graft function. Infectious complications consisted of 2 urinary tract infections, 1 bacterial pneumonia, and one case of otitis media.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Cyclosporine toxicity: the effect of combined therapy using cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone

Forty-nine patients among 360 who received renal transplants under cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred) immunosuppression required alteration of the immunosuppressive regimen because of intractable nephrotoxicity. Twenty-five patients, converted totally to azathioprine (Aza)/Pred, suffered intractable nephrotoxicity with no associated evidence suggesting ongoing rejection. The results with Aza/Pred conversion were disappointing because of an unacceptably high incidence of rejection and allograft loss. Twenty-four patients with intractable CsA nephrotoxicity were, therefore, treated using an alternative approach combining Aza with aggressive CsA dose reduction, and continued Pred therapy. All patients tolerated initiation of Aza without complication; allograft rejection was not common. Renal function improved for 23 of the 24 (96%) CsA/Aza/Pred patients with mean serum creatinine levels falling from 3.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL to 2.2 +/- 0.4 mg/dL after a mean follow-up of 14 months (P less than .001). Among 18 patients observed at least 12 months, seven (39%) enjoyed serum creatinine values less than or equal to 2 mg/dL. Nine CsA/Aza/Pred-treated patients (37.5%) required hospitalization because of infectious complications, all of which resolved with temporary reduction of immunosuppression and specific antimicrobial therapy when indicated. One patient sustained acute allograft rejection as a result of patient noncompliance, and one patient on a seemingly appropriate CsA/Aza/Pred dose responded initially to steroid pulse antirejection therapy; however, renal function again worsened. Two patients developed progressive renal dysfunction due to chronic rejection, and returned to dialysis 13 and 17 months, respectively, following initiation of CsA/Aza/Pred. Overall, the actuarial graft survival for CsA/Aza/Pred-treated patients was 100% at 1 year, and 84% at 2 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine

To evaluate the rate of recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine, we reviewed the outcome of 25 renal Tx performed in 24 patients who had FSGS as their original renal disease. After Tx, 6 patients were treated with steroids and azathioprine (follow-up: 42 +/- 34 months) and 19 with CsA (follow-up: 30 +/- 31 months). Two of 6 Aza treated patients (33%) developed recurrence of FSGS and nephrotic syndrome (NS). Both patients lost their graft because of FSGS 24 and 25 months after Tx. Ten of 19 patients (55%) given CsA showed recurrence of FSGS; one of them had had recurrence in the first graft treated with Aza. One patient lost his graft a few weeks after Tx because of acute rejection and 3 lost their graft because of FSGS 4-28 months after NS developed. One patient with NS died from pneumonia 14 months after Tx when his plasma creatinine was 2.7 mg/dl. Three other patients now have NS and plasma creatinine between 1.9 and 2.4 mg/dl 15-37 months after Tx. The last two patients have NS and normal renal function 10 and 31 months after Tx. In both groups, most patients developed NS within the first week after Tx. The patients with recurrence, given Aza or CsA, tended to be younger at the onset of the disease and to have a shorter duration of the disease, when compared with those without recurrence, but the differences were not statistically significant. In our experience neither CsA nor Aza showed any effect on the outcome of FSGS recurring in the graft.     

Results of the Minnesota randomized prospective trial of cyclosporine versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients

Between September 26, 1980 and June 8, 1984, 246 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone (n = 131) or azathioprine (Aza)-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (n = 115). On December 31, 1984, actuarial patient survival rates at three years were 89% in the CsA group and 90% in the Aza group, and the corresponding graft survival rates were 82% and 79% (statistically insignificant differences). The results were also compared separately in diabetic and nondiabetic patients and in recipients of related and cadaver donor grafts; only in the subgroup of diabetic recipients of cadaver kidneys were the differences in graft survival rates significantly different between CsA- and Aza-treated patients. The incidence of posttransplant acute tubular necrosis was similar in CsA- and Aza-treated patients (33% v 27%), but the duration was significantly longer in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (15.7 +/- 18.4 v 7.7 +/- 3.0 days). Rejection episodes and infections (particularly CMV) occurred significantly less frequently in CsA- than in Aza-treated patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (2.0 +/- 0.6 v 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl). Treatment of hypertension and hyperkalemia was required significantly more frequently in the CsA-treated patients than in the Aza-treated patients. Initial mean hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the CsA group than in the Aza group (15.6 +/- 9.5 v 19.8 +/- 10.7 days). In the CsA group, 19% of the patients were switched to Aza and 35% had Aza added to their regimen with a concomitant lowering of the CsA dose because of nephrotoxicity. The results of our randomized trial are at variance with those of others in that the graft survival rates in our trial were not different between CsA and Aza-treated patients, primarily because our conventionally-treated patients had a higher graft survival rate than in the other trials. The advantages of CsA (fewer rejection episodes, fewer infections, shorter hospitalization) outweigh the disadvantages (higher serum creatinine, more hypertension), and thus we believe it should be used in most renal allograft recipients, perhaps in combination with Aza so that a lower dose of CsA can be used and the side effects minimized--a regimen that we are currently evaluating.     

The incidence and impact of early rejection episodes on graft outcome in recipients of first cadaver kidney transplants.

The objective of this study was to define the incidence and significance of acute rejection occurring in the first year following transplantation. The influence of contemporary induction immunosuppression on rejection, as well as the effect of rejection on graft and patient loss, renal function, and maintenance immunosuppression during the first year in 110 recipients of first cadaver renal transplants were analyzed. All patients received CsA, Aza, and prednisone for 30 days with withdrawal of Aza at 30 days and then prednisone at 105 days; 57 patients were prospectively randomized to receive ALG (Merieux) until serum creatinine was less than 300 mumol/L. Short-term ALG administration did not influence the incidence, severity, nature, or outcome of rejection episodes. Fifty-five (50%) patients had at least 1 rejection in the first 90 days. All patients with delayed graft function and 7/8 (88%) sensitized patients (current PRA greater than 50%) had at least 1 rejection episode; 71% (n = 35) of all rejection episodes occurred in the first 30 days posttransplant. Patients rejection free at 90 days remained rejection free the entire first year. Graft loss was 18% for rejections in the first month, 13% for rejections occurring later (P = NS); 20% (n = 11) of patients had a second rejection and 1% (n = 2) had a third rejection. The risk of graft loss was 9% with a first rejection, 38% with a second rejection, and 50% with a third rejection. Of 12 (22%) rejections that were steroid resistant, 10 (83%) were reversed with OKT3. One-year graft survival for patients without rejection, with steroid-sensitive rejection, and with steroid-resistant rejection was 96%, 88% (P = ns), and 58% (P less than 0.001), respectively; 1 year SCr was 168 +/- 93, 196 +/- 77 (P = ns), and 268 +/- 96 microMol/L (P less than 0.05), respectively. Patients free of rejection and with stable renal function continued to do well on maintenance CsA monotherapy, and they were more likely to be on CsA monotherapy than those with rejection episodes (P less than 0.01).     

Impact of long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporin A on serum lipids in stable renal transplant recipients

Abstract. To determine the impact of long-term immunosuppression on serum lipids in stable renal graft recipients we measured serum lipids and apolipoprotein B concentrations in 20 patients receiving therapy with cyclosporin (CsA) and low-dose prednisolone (CsA/P) and in 18 patients on therapy with azathioprine and maintenance steroids (Aza/P). The patients were matched for age, body mass index, primary renal disease and dose of prednisolone, but not for the duration in transplantation and serum creatinine concentration. Triglyceride concentrations were significantly higher in the CsA/P group than in Aza/P-treated patients: 2.62 ± 0.35 vs 1.62 ± 0.23 mmol/l ( P < 0.05). Similarly, total cholesterol (C) levels were significantly more elevated in the CsA/P recipients than in the other group: 7.4410.32 vs 5.84 ± 0.25 (F<0.02). CsA/P patients had higher serum levels of LDL-C (4.79 ± 0.20 vs 3.43 ± 0.19 mmol/l ( P < 0.001) and apolipoprotein B concentrations (191 ± 13 vs 128 ± 9 mg/dl; P < 0.001). CsA/P and Aza/P recipients had similar concentrations of HDL-C (1.73 ± 0.13 vs 1.52 ± 0.09 mmol/l; NS). We conclude that in stable renal graft recipients with good transplant function long-term immunosuppression with CsA/P is associated with a more atherogenic lipid status than therapy with Aza/P.     

Randomized study comparing cyclosporine with azathioprine one year after renal transplantation-15-year outcome data

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) improved 1-year graft survival and reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes after renal transplantation compared to azathioprine (Aza). However, CsA has many side effects and reducing exposure of this drug after the first year may benefit long-term patient and graft survival. METHODS: We report 15-year outcome data from a single center, randomized controlled study comparing CsA withdrawal and conversion to Aza with continuation of CsA 1-year posttransplant. RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen patients who showed a serum creatinine less than 300 mumol/L with no acute rejection episodes in the preceding 6 months were enrolled (CsA 114, Aza 102). There was no difference in patient survival at 15 years: 62.4% in the CsA group and 64.4% in the Aza group (P=0.6). Fifteen-year transplant survival was 41.9% for the CsA group and 48.8% for the Aza group (P=0.8). Fifteen-year graft survival censoring for death with a functioning graft was 58% in the CsA group and 72% in the Aza group (P=0.5). Predictors of patient survival were younger recipient age (P<0.001) and lower systolic blood pressure at randomization (P=0.01). Predictors of graft survival were older recipient age (P<0.001) and better renal function at randomization (P=0.01). Assigned drug showed no effect on graft or patient survival. Patients assigned to CsA showed significantly worse renal function up to 10 years posttransplantation and required more anti-hypertensive treatment throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: In a selected group of patients, either Aza or low-dose CsA is safe and effective. Despite lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) up to 10 years posttransplantation and increased use of anti-hypertensive agents, low-dose CsA was not associated with a worse patient or graft survival.     

The Milan clinical trial with cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. A three-year follow-up

Between February and November 1983, 108 recipients of cadaveric renal transplants entered a randomized multicenter trial and were treated either with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (n = 55) or with conventional treatment based on azathioprine (Aza) and glucocorticoids (n = 53). The graft survival probability at 3 years was 76% for CsA patients and 48% for Aza patients (P less than 0.001). The cumulative number of acute rejections was significantly lower in the CsA group (32 vs. 104, P less than 0.001). Incidence of early posttransplant anuria was similar in both groups and did not affect renal function after three years. Nephrotoxicity in CsA patients, when present, was handled by reducing the dose of CsA, but in 12/55 patients a change to conventional therapy was thought to be necessary. However, in this group of 12, one patient lost the allograft because of irreversible rejection and one patient died 14 months later because of an infection. Mean creatinine clearance after three years was significantly lower in the CsA patients (54.7 +/- 2.6 ml/min) than in Aza patients, (67.2 +/- 4.9 ml/min, P less than 0.05). Considering only patients with grafts functioning after three years and still on the original randomized therapy, the mean creatinine clearance was similarly and significantly decreased from 1 to 3 years in both groups. There were no significant differences in occurrence of severe infections. Side effects such as hypertension, hypertrichosis, tremor and gum hyperplasia were more frequent in CsA patients.     

Long-term beneficial effects of azathioprine addition to ongoing cyclosporine-prednisone protocol in renal transplantation

Delayed addition of azathioprine (Aza) to an ongoing cyclosporine-prednisone protocol was started 11.3 ± 9.9 months after renal transplantation in 31 patients. Group I (n = 10) had chronic renal function deterioration due to chronic rejection, group II (n = 11) had repeated or severe acute rejection episodes and group III (n = 10) had cyclosporine (Cs) toxicity despite drug tapering. In group I, SCr had risen over the 6 months prior to Aza addition (P < 0.05), renal function declining at a rate of ?0.13 ± 0.12 SCr^?1. In the 6 months post-Aza, renal function improved at a rate of 0.05 ± 0.07 SCr^?1, and during the entire follow-up at a rate of 0.05 ± 0.12 SCr^?1 (P < 0.01) with stable Cs levels. In group II the decline in renal function was greater, though the rate of decline was stopped after Aza. In group III, renal function improved in eight patients. After 23 ± 12 months of follow-up, 15 patients had improved graft function, two were stable, 12 had worsened (nine on dialysis) and two had died. Amelioration of chronic graft dysfunction can be achieved by delayed addition of Aza to Cs-prednisone-treated renal allograft patients with chronic rejection or Cs toxicity, with long-term beneficial effects in a high proportion of patients.     

Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine a in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study

BACKGROUND: This study determined whether cyclosporine A (CsA)-treated renal allograft recipients with deteriorating renal function ("creeping creatinine") secondary to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) benefit from the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to their immunosuppressive regimen, followed by withdrawal of CsA. METHODS: In a controlled, open, multicenter study, CsA-treated renal allograft recipients with progressively deteriorating renal function were randomized to have their CsA discontinued with the concomitant addition of MMF to their regimen (group A) or to continue treatment with CsA (group B). The primary endpoint was the response rate over the 6-month period after withdrawal of CsA in group A or the equivalent time in group B. Response was defined as a stabilization or reduction of serum creatinine (SCr), as evidenced by a flattening or positive slope of the 1/SCr plot and no graft loss. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of acute rejection, graft and patient survival, and changes in selected metabolic parameters. RESULTS: The response rate in the primary intent-to-treat population (n=122) was 58% (36/62) in group A versus 32% (19/60) in group B (P=0.0060). The corresponding percentages of responders in the per-protocol population (n=107) were 60% (36/60) and 26% (12/47), respectively (P=0.0008). There were no acute rejections in group A during the study period. Patients in this group also experienced a significant decrease in total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with progressively deteriorating renal function secondary to CAN, addition of MMF followed by withdrawal of CsA results in a significant improvement in transplant function without the risk of acute rejection.     

A randomized trial of steroid avoidance in renal transplant patients treated with everolimus and cyclosporine

In this randomized trial renal transplant recipients were treated with basiliximab, everolimus 3 mg/day, low-dose CsA. At transplantation, patients were randomized to stop steroids at the seventh day (group A) or to continue oral steroids in low doses (group B). Of the 113 patients enrolled, 65 were randomized to group A and 68 to group B. All patients were followed for 2 years. During the study 28 (43%) group A patients required reintroduced corticosteroids. One patient died, in group B. The Graft survival rate was 97% in group A and 90% in group B. There were more biopsy-proven rejections in group A (32% vs 16%; P = .044). The mean creatinine clearance was 54 +/- 21 mL/min in group A vs 56 +/- 22 mL/min in group B. Mean levels of serum cholesterol tended to be lower in group A, but the difference was of borderline significance (191 +/- 91 vs 251 +/- 188 mg/dL; P = .07). Vascular thrombosis (0 vs 5) and pneumonia requiring hospitalization (2 vs 7) tended to be more frequent in group B. Only three cases of CMV infection (1 vs 2) occurred. An immunosuppressive therapy with everolimus and low-dose CsA allows one to obtain excellent renal graft survival and stable graft function at 2 years. Early interruption of steroids in patients treated with this regimen may increase the risk of acute rejection, but neither affects graft survival nor graft function, while possibly reducing the risk of hyperlipemia and vascular thrombosis. About 60% of patients given everolimus and low-dose CsA can definitively stop steroids after 1 week.     

Impact of the variability of cyclosporin A trough levels on long-term renal allograft function.

BACKGROUND: Among renal allograft recipients, there is a considerable variability in cyclosporin A (CsA) trough levels. Some of the CsA metabolites are pharmacologically active. The variability of polyclonal CsA trough levels may contribute to the fact that long-term renal allograft survival is still not satisfactory. In a retrospective, single-centre study, we investigated the influence of the variability of polyclonal CsA trough levels on long-term renal allograft function. METHODS: Patients (n=381) received double immunosuppression consisting of CsA and methylprednisolone (MP). For each patient the CsA coefficient of variation (CCV) and the mean CsA trough level during the observation period (5 years) were calculated. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, patients were divided into two groups: group I, CCV <28.05%, n=231; group II, CCV >28.05%, n=150. Additionally, patients were divided into three groups according to their mean CsA trough level: group A, <270 ng/ml, n=50; group B, 270-370 ng/ml, n=282; group C: >370 ng/ml, n=49. RESULTS: Compared to group I, patients in group II experienced a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes (40.7% vs 29.4%, P=0.02), reduced 5-year graft survival (81.1% vs 93.3%, P=0.002), and higher serum creatinine levels (1.7+/-1.2 mg/dl vs 1.4+/-0.5 mg/dl, P=0.03). In patients with low mean CsA trough levels, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was elevated (group A vs B, 50.0% vs 30.9%, P=0.008) and 5-year graft survival was reduced (group A vs B, 79.8% vs 89.5%, P=0.005). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the risk of graft failure within 5 years after transplantation was markedly elevated in group II (RR: 6.2, P=0.013) and in group A (RR: 8.9, P=0.008). Whereas the effect of CCV on 5-year graft survival was still evident in patients with normal or high mean CsA trough levels (>270 ng/ml, 81.9% vs 94.8%, P=0.0005), graft survival was independent from CCV in patients with low mean CsA trough levels (<270 ng/ml, 77.0% vs 81.7%, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Both, the intra-individual variability and the mean of polyclonal CsA trough levels influence long-term renal allograft survival. Targeting at sufficiently high mean CsA levels with a low intra-individual variability may help to further improve long-term renal allograft survival.     

他克莫司与环孢素A在尸肾移植中应用的长期疗效和安全性比较

目的　比较他克莫司 (FK5 0 6 )和环孢素A(CsA)在尸肾移植中应用的长期疗效和安全性。方法　 2 10例尸肾移植患者分为FK5 0 6组和CsA组 ,随访 12～ 32个月 ,观察两个组血药浓度变化、急性排斥和慢性排斥反应发生率、人 /肾 1年存活率、血肌酐、肝功能、血糖及血脂水平、药物不良反应、感染发生率以及FK5 0 6逆转顽固性急性排斥反应的效果。结果　血中FK5 0 6和CsA浓度谷值的变化趋势基本相同。FK5 0 6组与CsA组相比 ,急、慢性排斥反应发生率明显降低 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;肝功能异常发生率、高脂血症和牙龈增生发生率以及术后 3个月血肌酐水平均明显降低 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;高血糖和震颤发生率明显升高 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;感染发生率及人 /肾 1年存活率的差异无显著性。结论　与CsA相比 ,FK5 0 6是一种更高效的免疫抑制剂 ,长期使用可以有效降低肾移植后急、慢性排斥反应的发生率 ,有利于移植肾功能的恢复。     

Impact of long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporin A on serum lipids in stable renal transplant recipients

To determine the impact of long-term immunosuppression on serum lipids in stable renal graft recipients we measured serum lipids and apolipoprotein B concentrations in 20 patients receiving therapy with cyclosporin (CsA) and low-dose prednisolone (CsA/P) and in 18 patients on therapy with azathioprine and maintenance steroids (Aza/P). The patients were matched for age, body mass index, primary renal disease and dose of prednisolone, but not for the duration in transplantation and serum creatinine concentration. Triglyceride concentrations were significantly higher in the CsA/P group than in Aza/P-treated patients: 2.62±0.35 vs 1.62±0.23 mmol/l (P<0.05). Similarly, total cholesterol (C) levels were significantly more elevated in the CsA/P recipients than in the other group: 7.44±0.32 vs 5.84±0.25 (P<0.02). CsA/P patients had higher serum levels of LDL-C (4.79±0.20 vs 3.43±0.19 mmol/l P<0.001) and apolipoprotein B concentrations (191±13 vs 128±9 mg/dl; P<0.001). CsA/P and Aza/P recipients had similar concentrations of HDL-C (1.73±0.13 vs 1.52±0.09 mmol/l; NS). We conclude that in stable renal graft recipients with good transplant function long-term immunosuppression with CsA/P is associated with a more atherogenic lipid status than therapy with Aza/P.     

Conversion from cyclosporine to azathioprine in renal allograft recipients

Fifty seven recipients of renal allografts initially treated with CsA and low-dose prednisone were switched to azathioprine and low-dose steroids. Ten had prolonged (greater than 28 days) allograft nonfunction after transplantation (group 1), 8 had ongoing, poorly controlled rejection (group 2), and 39 had stable functioning grafts (group 3). With a mean follow-up period of 5 +/- 3 months after conversion, 50 grafts remained functional including 6 of 10 in group 1, 6 of 8 in group 2, and 38 of 39 in group 3. Thirty-seven (65%) had improved function, 12 (21%) had stable function, and 8 (14%) experienced declining renal function. Three of these latter 8 patients required reinstitution of CsA therapy. There were 20 episodes of acute rejection in 18 patients; one graft lost function because of acute rejection unresponsive to therapy. Reasons for the 6 other graft losses were persistent primary nonfunction in 3 patients from group 1, untreated rejection in 2 patients who had multiple prior rejection episodes while on CsA, and chronic rejection in one patient. Although renal function has improved or stabilized in the majority (86%) of individuals changed to azathioprine therapy, there was substantial risk of acute rejection (32%) complicating this procedure. Patients most likely to benefit from conversion to azathioprine therapy are those with prolonged graft nonfunction after transplantation and those with serum creatinines greater than 2.0 mg/dl.     

Causes of graft loss beyond two years in the cyclosporine era

While CsA has improved renal-allograft survival rates in the first 2 years compared with Aza, Terasaki's multicenter study (1) failed to show any difference in long-term graft survival in CsA-Pred versus Aza-Pred-treated recipients. The present study examines the long-term graft-survival rates at a single center using CsA immunosuppression and seeks to discern the causes of 58 graft losses among 343 patients with functioning grafts beyond 2 years posttransplantation. The 6-year primary and cadaveric actuarial graft survival at this institution is 59% with a graft half-life of 10 years, which is better than the 40% and 7.7 years, respectively, reported by Terasaki (1) for primary cadaveric recipients on Aza-Pred. It is also better than the 41%, 6-year survival and 5.5-year half-life for primary cadaveric recipients treated with CsA-Pred as reported in the multicenter study. (1) Less experience with the use of CsA may explain the latter comparison. Primary LRD grafts at this institution (2/3 haploidentical) have a 6-year actuarial survival of 77% and a half-life very closely approximating that of HLA-identical LRD grafts under Aza (23.4 years). These results demonstrate that CsA mitigates the effects of HLA incompatibility to reduce graft survival. The most common cause of graft loss beyond 2 years was chronic rejection (36.2%) followed by noncompliance (27.6%). Patient deaths resulted in 13 of the 58 graft losses; most of the deaths were related to cardiovascular diseases. Only 3 patients died from causes that could be attributed to CsA immunosuppression; 2 from sepsis and 1 from viral hepatitis. Acute rejection caused 8.6% of the graft losses on continuous CsA therapy. When immunologic risk factors were analyzed, the entire graft-loss group had a significantly higher proportion of retransplant patients than the graft-survival group (P less than 0.005), suggesting that prior transplantation imposes a higher risk for graft loss not only acutely but long term as well. However, retransplanted patients were significantly less likely to lose their grafts because of noncompliance (P less than 0.005). Male patients were found to be significantly more noncompliant.     

Optimization of the immunosuppressive protocol after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The successful use of tacrolimus (Tac)-based immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplantation and our own positive experience in heart transplantation led us to investigate regimens including this agent at our center for lung transplantation. METHODS: From 1991 to 1998, 86 patients underwent lung transplants at our center and 78 of them were included in this analysis. The first 34 patients were treated with cyclosporin (CsA), azathioprine (Aza), and rabbit antilymphocyte globulin; the subsequent 30 patients received Tac with Aza, and the most recent 12 patients Tac with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In addition, all patients received prednisone. RESULTS: The number of acute rejection episodes per 100 patient days was 1.5, 0.6, and 0.3 for three treatment groups, respectively. Similarly, the incidence of refractory acute rejection per 100 patient days was lower in both Tac groups (0.20, 0.03, and 0, respectively). Freedom from acute rejection was highest in the Tac-MMF group (P=0.0037 vs. Tac/Aza, P=0.0007 vs. CsA/Aza). Freedom from recurrent acute rejection was significantly higher in both Tac groups (P=0.027 Tac/ Aza vs. CsA/Aza and P=0.025 Tac/MMF vs. CsA/Aza). The incidence of infections per 100 patient days was similar (0.8, 0.5, and 0.8) in all three treatment groups, with a similar distribution of fungal, bacterial, and viral infections. Freedom from infection also showed no difference. The survival rate was significantly higher for the Tac population, with actuarial 1- and 3-year survival rates of 93% and 71%, compared with the CsA group (71% and 51%, respectively, P=0.04). Prevalence of renal dysfunction (creatinine >2.0 mg/ dL) was 18%, 13%, and 0% in the 3 treatment groups, respectively. The development of glucose metabolism disorders was lower in the CsA group than in the Tac-Aza group (15% vs. 27%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tac-based immunosuppressive therapy results in a lower rate of acute rejection after pulmonary transplantation, with similar infection rates and a slightly higher incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus compared with CsA-based therapy.     

Effective long-term immunosuppression maintained by low cyclosporine levels in primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients

Nephrotoxicity and cost are the major problems in the use of cyclosporine (CsA) in renal transplantation. Thus, maintenance of CsA levels at the lower limits of the therapeutic range is desirable. The lowest CsA level effective in preventing rejection while avoiding nephrotoxicity has not been defined. We report on 44 primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with a protocol that involved a progressive reduction in the trough CsA levels. CsA was initiated at an oral dose of 15 mg/kg, and this dose was adjusted to achieve serum trough levels, as measured by radioimmunoassay, of 150-200 ng/ml during the first month, 100-150 ng/ml during the second month, 75-100 ng/ml during the third month, and 50-75 ng/ml thereafter. Patient and graft survival at 18 months were 94% and 83.6%, respectively. The mean daily CsA doses were 6.7 +/- 3.1 mg/kg at 6 months, 5.5 +/- 3.2 mg/kg at 12 months, and 4.7 +/- 2.4 mg/kg at 18 months. Corresponding trough serum CsA levels were 94 +/- 59 ng/ml, 64 +/- 22 ng/ml, and 44 +/- 21 ng/ml at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Mean serum creatinine concentrations were 1.8 +/- 0.6 mg/dl at 6 months, 1.7 +/- 0.5 mg/dl at 12 months, and 1.6 +/- 0.5 mg/dl at 18 months. The mean serum creatinine concentration at 18 months was not significantly different from that of 18 conventionally treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients (1.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 mg/dl, P = .31). A total of 67% of patients did not have any rejection episodes under this protocol, while 71% of patients never developed CsA nephrotoxicity. No patient was taken off CsA for progressive nephrotoxicity. We conclude that trough serum CsA levels of 50-75 ng/ml, as measured by radioimmunoassay, are sufficient to maintain effective immunosuppression in the long-term management of primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients. These values are much lower than previously recommended, and this approach ameliorates chronic CsA nephrotoxicity.     

Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study.

Steroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation despite their adverse effects. The introduction of new immunosuppressant has improved the survival rates and prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal at 6 months post-transplant between tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine A + MMF (CsA group). Steroid was withdrawn at 6 months post-transplant under the condition of no rejection episode proven by biopsy and maintenance of serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl. Fourteen recipients were excluded because of acute rejection within 6 months or protocol violation. Steroid could be tapered off in 62 in FK group and 55 in CsA. Three cases in FK group and five in CsA had acute rejection within another 6 months after steroid withdrawal (P > 0.05). At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes was 18.6% vs. 8.0% in FK and CsA group. And hypercholesterolemia was presented in 8.5% vs. 2.0%, hypertension in 47.5% vs. 56.0%, and serum creatinine level 1.18 +/- 0.24 mg/dl vs. 1.18 +/- 0.20 mg/dl, respectively (P > 0.05). Steroid withdrawal may be carried out successfully using both FK and CsA with MMF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.     

Low serum magnesium is associated with decreased graft survival in patients with chronic cyclosporin nephrotoxicity.

BACKGROUND: Hypomagnesaemia is a common side effect of cyclosporin A (CsA) therapy. Animal studies suggest that magnesium (Mg) supplementation inhibits chronic CsA nephropathy. METHODS: To determine if low Mg levels correlate with true CsA-induced nephrotoxicity in humans, we examined kidney transplant biopsy records at our centre for all transplant biopsies performed between 1990 and 2002. We simultaneously reviewed the medical records to determine whether serum Mg levels were checked at the time of biopsy. Those individuals with histologically proven CsA nephrotoxicity were studied. RESULTS: Serum total Mg levels were available for 320 patients, 60 of whom were diagnosed with chronic CsA-mediated nephropathy. Patients were divided in two groups, a low Mg [n = 29, 1.8 (1.67-1.9) mg/dl or 0.74 (0.68-0.78) mmol/l] and a normal Mg group [n = 31, 2.2 (2.0-2.4) mg/dl or 0.9 (0.82-0.98) mmol/l, P<0.05] based on the median Mg level in the entire cohort (2 mg/dl or 0.82 mmol/l). Both groups were analysed for disease progression and graft loss using the slope of creatinine clearance (CCR) and multivariate analyses. Although the CCR at the time of biopsy was greater in the low Mg group [44.3 (36.3-64.3) ml/min vs 37.8 (25.2-47.3) ml/min, P<0.05), the decline in graft function was faster in this group (-8.9+/-3.5 vs 1+/-2.7 ml/min/year; P = 0.02) compared with the normal Mg cohort. Using Cox proportional hazards analyses, the adjusted graft survival was significantly reduced in the low Mg group 5 years after biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that low serum Mg levels were associated with a faster rate of decline in kidney allograft function and increased rates of graft loss in renal transplant recipients with chronic CsA nephropathy. This suggests that hypomagnesaemia could potentiate CsA-mediated nephropathy.