Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy. II. Repeated examinations of the colon every 6 months after removal of sessile adenomas and adenomas with the highest degrees of dysplasia

Fifty-five patients with colorectal sessile adenomas and adenomas with the severest dysplasia were followed up every 6 months with colonoscopy and/or double-contrast enema during 4 years, after a clean colon had been obtained, by repeated colonoscopy within 3 months after piecemeal polypectomy. The repetition at 3 months resulted in detection of two cancers. An overlooked cancer was detected at 1 year, and another cancer was diagnosed between examinations. Risk of new adenomas (19 patients) was related to original size, number, and glandular structure of the polyps. Twelve of the 19 patients had new polyps above the rectum. The 336 colonoscopies were complicated by 3 laparotomies, made necessary by perforation and bleeding. The results suggest that intervals between examinations of patients with the present type of adenomas may be prolonged, and patients are now allocated at random to colorectal follow-up examination every 6 and 12 months.     

Reproducibility and diagnostic value of Hemoccult-II test. A colonoscopic evaluation in asymptomatic patients

Inter-observer agreement rate in double readings of 246 Hemoccult-II tests was 0.88 (Kappa analysis). The slides were not rehydrated. The Hemoccult-II test was performed immediately before 748 total colonoscopies in asymptomatic patients after previous polypectomy or radical surgery for cancer to estimate the diagnostic value of the test in mass screening, accepting a higher prevalence of neoplasia in the study group but realizing that colonoscopy can only be performed in high-risk groups. Another purpose was to investigate the possibility of replacing colonoscopy with Hemoccult-II in surveillance after previous adenoma or cancer. The 79 colonoscopies after a positive test showed cancer in 3, adenomas in 13, and other intestinal pathology in 34 cases. The 669 colonoscopies after negative tests showed cancer in 1, adenomas in 67, and other pathology in 141 cases. In conclusion, the test cannot be used as a guideline for colonoscopy in follow-up programs for patients who have had adenomas, since it missed 84% of the new cases in the present series. The test does not exclude the presence of colorectal carcinoma, but the risk of cancer is probably several times less in patients with negative tests (1 of 669) than in patients with positive tests (3 of 79), which may justify the use of the Hemoccult-II test for mass screening in asymptomatic populations.     

The remaining colon after radical surgery for colorectal cancer

This study investigates the possible gain and limitation by performing colonoscopy and double-contrast enema immediately after, and every six months after, radical surgery for colorectal cancer. It was possible to perform a complete colonoscopy within three months of surgery in 80 per cent of the 239 patients and at the follow-up time in 90 per cent. Incompleteness was related to insufficient bowel preparation, narrow anastomosis, and long transverse colon. Five patients had synchronous cancers, and 64 had adenomas at the time of surgery. The risk of recurrent adenomas in the latter was higher (17/64) than in those without adenomas (15/175). The adenomas were located above the rectum in 57 of 80 patients who had polypectomy. Four patients with metachronous cancer and one of five patients with local recurrence had another radical operation, while this was possible in none of 40 patients with recurrence diagnosed by other means than colonoscopy and enema. Radical colorectal surgery should be followed by colonoscopy and double-contrast enema, but how often and for how long remains to be established.     

Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese

BACKGROUND: Whereas high recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas after polypectomy are widely recognised, little is known of the natural incidence in those with no neoplastic lesions initially. It is also known that single colonoscopy has a significant miss rate. AIMS: To elucidate the incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal neoplasms from a large cohort of asymptomatic Japanese patients on the basis of annually repeated colonoscopies. METHODS: A total of 6225 subjects (4659 men and 1566 women) participating in an annual colonoscopic screening programme and completing three or more colonoscopies were analysed during the 14 year period between 1988 and 2002. Patients were divided into three groups according to the findings of the initial two colonoscopies: 4084 subjects with no neoplasm, 1818 with small adenomas <10 mm, and 323 with advanced lesions, including carcinoma in situ, severe dysplasia, or large adenomas > or =10 mm. Mean age at the second colonoscopy was 48.8 years. RESULTS: For all types of colorectal neoplasms, the incidence rate in those with no initial neoplasm was 7.2%/year whereas recurrence rates in those with small adenomas and advanced lesions were 19.3% and 22.9%/year, respectively. For advanced colorectal lesions, the incidence rate was 0.21%/year whereas recurrence rates in those with small adenomas and advanced lesions were 0.64% and 1.88%/year, respectively. Colorectal neoplasms were in general more likely to develop in males and older subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Although recurrence rates after polypectomy were elevated, the incidence rates in subjects with no neoplastic lesions initially were quite high.     

How often should we perform surveillance colonoscopy after surgery for colorectal cancer?

Purpose

Surveillance colonoscopy is undertaken after resection of colorectal cancer to detect and treat local recurrence and metachronous lesions, with the aim of improving survival. This study aimed to clarify the current timing of surveillance colonoscopies and evaluate the rates of local recurrence and metachronous tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 459 patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy at our institution after curative resection of colorectal cancer. The number and timing of surveillance colonoscopies, incidence of local recurrence and metachronous lesions, pathological findings of lesions, treatment of lesions, and outcomes were recorded.

Results

The first surveillance colonoscopy was undertaken at 6–18 months after surgery in 73 % of patients. Local recurrence was detected in three cases (0.7 %), all during the first surveillance colonoscopy, which was performed >1 year after surgery. These three patients all underwent additional surgery and were alive 5 years later. Invasive metachronous cancers were detected in six patients (1.3 %) at 18–57 months after surgery, and advanced adenomas were detected in 30 patients.

Conclusion

Considering the low incidence of postoperative lesions and the timing of lesion detection, reducing the number of surveillance colonoscopies after surgery for colorectal cancer may be appropriate.     

Number of aberrant crypt foci in the rectum is a useful surrogate marker of colorectal adenoma recurrence

Aim: Endoscopic screening and removal of colorectal adenomas can reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. However, given the possibility of adenoma recurrence, surveillance colonoscopy is currently recommended after the initial screening and removal of colorectal adenomas. Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) have been shown to serve as a reliable surrogate marker of colorectal carcinogenesis. In this study, the relationship between the number of ACF at the initial endoscopic polypectomy and the likelihood of colorectal adenoma recurrence after polypectomy were investigated. Methods: High‐magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy was performed in 82 subjects who underwent endoscopic polypectomy to identify ACF in the lower rectum. Surveillance colonoscopy was then performed 3 years after the baseline polypectomy at Yokohama City University Hospital. Results: The number of ACF was greater in patients who showed adenoma recurrence (7.88 ± 6.35) than in those who did not (2.19 ± 2.95) (P < 0.001). Receiver–operating curve analysis showed that the number of ACF was a highly specific predictor of the risk of adenoma recurrence. Conclusions: This is the first study conducted to investigate the relationship between the number of ACF after endoscopic polypectomy and the likelihood of recurrence of colorectal adenomas. These results suggest that the number of ACF is a useful predictor of the likelihood of colorectal adenoma recurrence.     

Adenoma incidence decreases under the effect of polypectomy

AIM:To investigate whether,under the influence of pol-ypectomy,the incidence of adenoma decreases with age.METHODS:Consecutive patients with colonic adenomas identified at index colonoscopy were retrospectively selected if they had undergone three or more complete colonoscopies,at least 24 mo apart.Patients who had any first-degree relative with colorectal cancer were excluded.Data regarding number of adenomas at each colonoscopy,their location,size and histological classification were recorded.The monthly incidence density of adenomas after the index examination was estimated for the study population,by using the person-years method.Baseline adenomas were excluded from incidence calculations but their characteristics were correlated with recurrence at follow-up,using the χ 2 test.RESULTS:One hundred and fifty-six patients were included(109 male,mean age at index colonoscopy 56.8 ± 10.3 years),with follow-up that ranged from 48 to 232 mo.No significant correlations were observed between the number,the presence of villous component,or the size of adenomas at index colonoscopy and the presence of adenomas at subsequent colonoscopies(P = 0.49,0.12 and 0.78,respectively).The incidence of colonic adenomas was observed to decay from 1.4% person-months at the beginning of the study to values close to 0%,at 12 years after index colonoscopy.CONCLUSION:Our results suggest the sporadic formation of adenomas occurs within a discrete period and that,when these adenomas are removed,all neoplasia-prone clones may be extinguished.     

Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy

The goal of surveillance examinations after polypectomy is to detect new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas, as well as preventing adenomas from becoming invasive or cancerous. The first colonoscopy surveillance program reported was the National Polyp Study from the United States in 1997, with an update in 2003. First screening colonoscopy and polypectomy have been shown to produce the greatest effects in reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomatous polyps. However, a large number of adenomas are being discovered as a result of the increased use of colorectal cancer screening, particularly with the dramatic increase in screening colonoscopy and surveillance. Increased efficiency of surveillance colonoscopy practices is therefore needed to decrease the cost, risk, and overuse of medical resources. In developing surveillance programs, studying miss rates and incidences and performing separate evaluations are important, along with accurately assessing incidence. This is because the recurrence rate or apparent incidence after colonoscopic polypectomy includes the true incidence of new polyp formation plus the incidence of missed polyps from the initial colonoscopy. Many studies have indicated the number of adenomas on initial examination as the most significant predictor for missed adenoma and incidence of adenoma on surveillance colonoscopy. In Japan, many facets of colonoscopic examination differ from those in Western countries. Further studies are recommended to establish an appropriate and original Japanese colonoscopy surveillance program for use after polypectomy, based on guidelines from the United States.     

Follow-up after Colorectal Polypectomy

To investigate the effect of follow-up study after colorectal polypectomy, 156 patients with symptomatic stalked adenomas with light to severe dysplasia were allocated at random to colorectal examination every 6 (A) and 24 (B) months after colonoscopic polypectomy. No high-risk group could be identified. Twenty-one of the 23 new polyps were located above the rectum, but 15 could have been removed during examination with the flexible sigmoidoscope. The risk of new adenomas was similar at all 6-month examinations, during the first 4 years of the study. A small carcinoma (Dukes A) was found at 24 months in group B. A fatal colonic perforation was seen in group A after seven previous colonoscopies without complications. The new polyps caused no symptoms other than minimal bleeding in some of the patients, and because increasing the rate of colonscopies increases risk of complications, it was considered justified to prolong the intervals to 24 and 48 months, at random.     

Rectal epithelial cell proliferation patterns as predictors of adenomatous colorectal polyp recurrence.

To determine whether proliferative patterns in flat rectal mucosal samples can predict the recurrence of adenomatous colorectal polyps, after polypectomy, biopsy specimens from normal looking rectal mucosa were obtained at endoscopy from 55 patients diagnosed for the first time as having adenomatous colorectal polyps. Epithelial cell proliferation was assessed in biopsy specimens through 3H-thymidine autoradiography. After polypectomy, patients were followed for 24 months and underwent complete colonoscopy every 6 months to detect and remove any metachronous lesions. In 40 patients second biopsy specimens were taken during one of the follow up colonoscopies to evaluate the stability of proliferative indices over time. The ratio of labelled (S phase) to total cells (labelling index) for the entire crypt, as well as ratios for each of the five equal compartments into which the crypt had been divided longitudinally, was calculated for each patient. Mean labelling indices for upper crypt compartments 3 and 4 + 5 in the 22 patients in whom polyps recurred were significantly higher (respectively p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) than those of the 33 without recurrence suggesting that an upward shift of the crypt's replicative compartment is associated with polyp recurrence. Labelling indices remained essentially unchanged in those patients who underwent biopsy twice. Reproducible kinetic parameters such as these might be useful in planning follow up of patients with adenomatous polyps after polypectomy.     

Colon surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine costeffective colonoscopy guidelines for patients with prior colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of patients who had been treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma and later underwent follow-up colonoscopy from 1984 to 1994. RESULTS: During this study period, 389 patients previously treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent follow-up colonoscopy. All patients had perioperative colon evaluation for other neoplasms. Ages ranged from 26 to 89 (mean, 65.8) years, and 46.8 percent were female. Recurrent or metachronous cancer or a neoplastic polyp constituted a positive examination. Results of 389 first follow-up colonoscopies were compared with 259 second (66.6 percent), 165 third (42.4 percent), and 83 fourth (21.3 percent) follow-up examinations. Median interval between all colonoscopies was 13 months. Positive examination rates for the first two yearly examinations were 18.3 and 18.5 percent, respectively. Slightly lower, third-year and fourth-year positive examination rates were 16.4 and 14.5 percent, respectively. Fouryear examinations yielded the following: first year-1 carcinoid, 1 new adenocarcinoma, and 100 polyps; second year-1 anastomotic recurrence and 68 polyps; third year-55 polyps; and fourth year-1 recurrent cancer and 17 polyps. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that 1) annual follow-up colonoscopy for two years after colorectal cancer surgery is beneficial for detecting recurrent and metachronous neoplasms and 2) the interval between subsequent examinations may be increased depending on the result of the most recent examination.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, May 8 to 13, 1994.     

Can Hemoccult-IIℳ replace colonoscopy in surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer and after polypectomy?

Surveillance after colorectal carcinoma and adenoma includes colonoscopy, which is a demanding procedure for the patient, doctor, and society. Therefore, it was investigated whether a simple fecal occult blood test could replace colonoscopy. Hemoccult-II (H-II) was performed before 1,244 colonoscopies in patients with previous cancer and before 328 colonoscopies in an adenoma surveillance program. The H-II test was positive in 3 of 9 patients with local recurrence, in 2 of 13 with metachronous cancer, and in 31 of 186 with adenomas. The test was positive more often in patients with large and multiple adenomas, sigmoid adenomas, and adenomas with villous elements and moderate-to-severe dysplasia, but the sensitivity did not reach more than 25 to 40 percent. It was concluded that markers more sensitive than H-II are needed to detect metachronous cancers and new adenomas. In the meantime, colonoscopy has to be used with intervals of several years, but not for detection of local recurrent cancer, which in most cases may be found by simpler means.Supported by grants from the Danish Cancer Society.     

Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prevalence of advanced histology in small polyps has become a crucial issue in optimizing colorectal cancer screening strategies, especially in view of the advent of computed tomography colonography. We evaluated the prevalence of advanced histology in small and diminutive adenomas to clarify their clinical importance in terms of malignant potential. METHODS: Data were reviewed retrospectively from 3291 colonoscopies performed on asymptomatic patients found to have an adenoma on screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy a few weeks before the colonoscopy or who had a family history of colorectal cancer. All polyps were excised endoscopically and sent for pathology testing. Specimens with advanced histology were confirmed by a second reading. RESULTS: Of the 3291 colonoscopies performed, 1235 colonoscopies yielded a total of 1933 small or diminutive adenomatous polyps. Advanced histology including carcinoma was found in 10.1% of small (5-10 mm) adenomas and in 1.7% of diminutive adenomas (< or = 4 mm). Carcinoma was found in .9% of small adenomas, and 0% of diminutive adenomas. Of the 107 patients found to have polyps 2-10 mm with advanced histology, 100 (93%) were referred for colonoscopy because of an adenoma found on a recent screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Seven patients underwent colonoscopy for a positive family history of colon cancer; all 7 had a single affected first-degree relative older than age 50. CONCLUSIONS: Adenomas 5-10 mm in size harbor pathologically significant histology, and the need for removal of these lesions must be addressed to optimize colorectal cancer prevention.     

Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population

Background and aim  

Repeat colonoscopy is often performed within a short time after polypectomy due to the fear that colorectal adenomas were missed during the initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed. The aim of this study was to estimate the actual recurrence rate of adenoma and its association with the length of the surveillance interval after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.     

Follow-up of a cohort of 2604 colorectal adenomas treated in 1991 and 1992. Search for parameters related to adenomatous recurrence

AIM: To evaluate the recurrence of colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection of adenomas. METHODS: The establishment of a register of colorectal cancers and pre-cancerous lesions for Loire-Atlantique (a French administrative division) led to the recording of files for all subjects with colorectal adenomas. The files for the cohort followed up for the years 1991 and 1992 were re-examined at the end of 1998 to determine the risk factors for recurrence. Data from control colonoscopies were recorded. RESULTS: The files of 2 208 (84.9%) of the 2 604 subjects included in the study were examined in 1998. One thousand and four hundred fifty- two subjects had at least one control colonoscopy after a mean period of 28 months: 743 (28.5%) had colorectal neoplasia recurrence, including 18 with a cancer and 50 (2%) with high-grade dysplasia adenomas. The parameters related to recurrence risk were: polyp size, number and topographic distribution of adenomas, pedunculated type, histopathological classification, especially the degree of dysplasia. CONCLUSION: Recurrence of neoplasic lesions (cancer, high grade dysplasia adenomas) may be observed after adenoma resection.     

The Influence of Face Shields on the Quality of Colonoscopy in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background/AimsThe worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led endoscopists to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for infection prevention. This study aimed to investigate whether wearing a face shield as PPE affects the quality of colonoscopy.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records and colonoscopy findings of patients who underwent colonoscopies at Asan Medical Center, Korea from March 10 to May 31, 2020. The colonoscopies in this study were performed by five gastroenterology fellows and four expert endoscopists. We compared colonoscopy quality indicators, such as withdrawal time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), polypectomy time, and polypectomy adverse events, both before and after face shields were added as PPE on April 13, 2020.ResultsOf the 1,344 colonoscopies analyzed, 715 and 629 were performed before and after the introduction of face shields, respectively. The median withdrawal time was similar between the face shield and no-face shield groups (8.72 minutes vs 8.68 minutes, p=0.816), as was the ADR (41.5% vs 39.8%, p=0.605) and APC (0.72 vs 0.77, p=0.510). Polypectomy-associated quality indicators, such as polypectomy time and polypectomy adverse events were also not different between the groups. Quality indicators were not different between the face shield and no-face shield groups of gastroenterology fellows, or of expert endoscopists.ConclusionsColonoscopy performance was not unfavorably affected by the use of a face shield. PPE, including face shields, can be recommended without a concern about colonoscopy quality deterioration.     

Prognostic evaluation of planned follow- up in patients with colorectal adenomas

Between 1978 and 1986 colorectal adenomas without invasion were removed in 552 patients under 76 years of age. Patients were randomly allocated to different follow-up groups with intervals of colorectal examination varying from 6 to 48 months after the initial polypectomy. A large bowel carcinoma developed in three patients and new adenomas in 87 patients. Based on the morphology of the initial adenomas possible relationships between prognostic factors and the risk of new adenoma formation were assessed using life-table analysis. The advantage of a possible decrease in the risk of developing carcinoma was offset by the disadvantage of eight severe complications occurring in 1818 colonoscopies, one of which proved fatal. The occurrence of one of the three carcinomas was considered a failure of the follow-up programme.     

Short- and long-term results of colonoscopic polypectomy in children

Eighty-four colorectal polyps of up to 3.3 cm in diameter were removed with the diathermy snare during 48 colonoscopies on 42 children, aged 2 to 18 years (mean, 7.4 years). Most polyps were juvenile and the majority were located in the sigmoid colon (55%) or rectum (37%). No complications related to medication, colonoscopy, or snare polypectomy were observed. The two presenting symptoms, rectal bleeding and anemia, disappeared soon after polypectomy in all but one patient with adenomatous polyposis coli, subsequently operated upon. Follow-up examinations, including total colonoscopy, performed 4 months to 7 years (mean, 25 months) later did not reveal abnormalities in any of the 37 children whose previously removed polyps were juvenile. The authors conclude that endoscopic snare polypectomy is an effective and safe treatment for colorectal polyps in the pediatric age group.     

A prospective national study on colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in 2000 in France

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the practice of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in France in 2000. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in November 2000 using questionnaires sent to all gastroenterologists practicing in France (N=2858) who were asked to reply to items concerning colonoscopies and sigmoidoscopies performed on two workdays chosen in advance. The response rate was 32.8%. Data were extrapolated to establish estimates for the entire year. RESULTS: An estimated 894000 colonoscopies and 115320 sigmoidoscopies were performed in 2000. Single-use material was used in 22.1% of the procedures. Indications for endoscopy were mainly hematochezia (21.6%), gastrointestinal symptoms (35%) and surveillance of patients with a history of previous polypectomy (15%). Colorectal cancer screening was the indication for 20% of colonoscopies. Abnormal findings were reported for 54.8% of the endoscopies (polyps for 287218 procedures and cancer for 32799). Failure was noted in 4.9% of colonoscopies. The complication rate was 0.48%. Most polyps were adenomas (64.4%) or hyperplasic polyps (28.1%). The overall estimated number of colonoscopies with polypectomy was 224133. CONCLUSION: In 2000 there was an increased rate of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening (20%) but an overall decrease (2.5%) in the total number of colonoscopies compared to 1999. Abnormal findings were disclosed by 54.8% of the procedures. Extrapolation from these data indicates that colonoscopic screening enabled the diagnosis of 32799 colorectal cancers.     

Retrospective analysis of missed advanced adenomas on surveillance colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE: Miss rates of large polyp/cancer during colonoscopy are reported from tertiary centers where experts do the colonoscopies. This information is important for determining surveillance intervals for repeat colonoscopy, patient safety, and malpractice issues. We evaluated retrospectively the miss rates of advanced adenomas in the setting of a GI fellowship training where most colonoscopies are done by closely supervised fellows. METHODS: We reviewed the 235 patients who had at least one repeat colonoscopy after initial polypectomy, between 1992 and 1999, at the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Advanced adenomas were defined as polyps 10 mm or greater in size with or without a villous component or high-grade dysplasia. Data of missed advanced adenomas on 122 patients who had complete colonoscopy with satisfactory preparation and the excluded patients are reported. RESULTS: Four advanced adenomas (one had intramucosal cancer) on second colonoscopy and two advanced adenomas on third colonoscopy were missed. The miss rate of advanced adenoma for 232 patients was 1.7%, and the miss rate for the 122 patients with complete colonoscopy and satisfactory colon preparation was 2.5% and 3.3% on second and third repeat colonoscopy, respectively. No cancer was missed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows an advanced polyp miss rate that is comparable with other studies even in a fellowship training setting. Prospective studies with tandem surveillance colonoscopy are needed to confirm our findings.