Mechanisms of rejection: current perspectives

Rejection is the major barrier to successful transplantation. The immune response to an allograft is an ongoing dialogue between the innate and adaptive immune system that if left unchecked will lead to the rejection of transplanted cells, tissues, or organs. Activation of elements of the innate immune system, triggered as a consequence of tissue injury sustained during cell isolation or organ retrieval and ischemia reperfusion, will initiate and amplify the adaptive response. T cells require a minimum of two signals for activation, antigen recognition, and costimulation. The activation requirements of naive T cells are more stringent than those of memory T cells. Memory T cells are present in the majority of transplant recipients as a result of heterologous immunity. The majority of B cells require help from T cells to initiate antibody production. Antibodies reactive to donor human leukocyte antigen molecules, minor histocompatibility antigens, endothelial cells, RBCs, or autoantigens can trigger or contribute to rejection early and late after transplantation. Antibody-mediated rejection triggered by alloantibody binding and complement activation is recognized increasingly as a significant contribution to graft loss. Even though one component of the immune system may dominate and lead to rejection being described in short hand as T cell or antibody mediated, it is usually multifactorial resulting from the integration of multiple mechanisms. Identifying the molecular pathways that trigger tissue injury, signal transduction and rejection facilitates the identification of targets for the development of immunosuppressive drugs.     

Regulatory dendritic cell therapy in organ transplantation

Dendritic cells (DCs) are uniquely well equipped antigen (Ag)-presenting cells. Their classic function was thought to be that of potent initiators of innate and adaptive immunity to infectious organisms and other Ags (including transplanted organs). Evidence has emerged, however, that DCs have a central and crucial role in determining the fate of immune responses toward either immunity or tolerance. This dichotomous function of DCs, coupled with their remarkable plasticity, renders them attractive therapeutic targets for immune modulation. In transplantation, much recent work has focused on the ability of DCs to silence immune reactivity in an Ag-specific manner in the hope of preventing rejection and diminishing reliance on potentially harmful immunosuppressive agents. Experimental strategies have included in vivo targeting of DCs, as well as ex vivo generation of regulatory (or tolerogenic) DCs with subsequent reinfusion (i.e. cell therapy). Different approaches to 'program' DC toward tolerogenic properties include genetic (transgene insertion), biologic (differential culture conditions, anti-inflammatory cytokine exposure) and pharmacologic manipulation. Recent data suggest a promising role for pharmacologic treatment as a means of generating potent regulatory DCs and have further stimulated speculation regarding their potential clinical application. Herein, we discuss evidence that the potential of regulatory DC therapy is considerable and that there are compelling reasons to evaluate it in the setting of organ transplantation in the near future.     

Impact of innate and adaptive immunity on rejection and tolerance

Until recently, research on transplantation rejection and tolerance has been directed toward deciphering the mechanisms of the adaptive immune system. However, the emergence that the innate immune system, the body's first-line defense against pathogens, has a strong influence on adaptive immunity has galvanized interest in elucidating the interplay between these two arms of the immune system. The discovery of Toll-like receptors and the characterization of the cellular mediators involved in innate immunity have provided growing evidence that innate immunity affects the adaptive immune response. Emerging evidence has also shown that early "danger signals"' associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury or brain death contribute to innate immune activation, promoting rejection, and inhibiting tolerance induction. In addition, nonspecific stimuli such as increased donor age or patient disease may also serve to exert a synergistic influence on innate immune activation. Ultimately, controlling the events in innate immune activation may help drive tolerance induction and reduce the rate of rejection.     

Dendritic cells at the osteo-immune interface: implications for inflammation-induced bone loss.

Within the past decade, the critical roles of T cells and T cell-mediated immunity in inflammation-induced osteoclastogenesis and subsequent bone loss have been extensively studied, thereby establishing the new paradigm of osteoimmunology. Therefore, dendritic cells (DCs), the most potent antigen-presenting cells, responsible for activation of na?ve T cells and orchestration of the immune response, became critically situated at the osteo-immune interface. Today, emerging new evidence suggests that DC may be directly involved in inflammation-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone loss, by acting as osteoclast (OC) precursors that can further develop into DC-derived OCs (DDOC) under inflammatory conditions. These findings have tremendous implications, because in addition to DC's important roles in regulating innate and adaptive immunity, a direct contribution by these cells to inflammation-induced bone loss may provide a promising therapeutic target not only for controlling inflammation but also for modulating bone destruction.     

TH1 Immune Responses to Fully MHC Mismatched Allografts are Diminished in the Absence of MyD88, a Toll-Like Receptor Signal Adaptor Protein

Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) are innate immune receptors that are critical for recognizing conserved microbial motifs by inducing TH1 immunity. The majority of TLRs utilize the adaptor protein MyD88 for signal transduction, although other adaptors have been recently described. As the role of innate immunity in transplantation is unclear, we examined the importance of the MyD88 pathway in acute rejection of fully MHC‐mismatched murine allografts and specifically investigated whether MyD88 signaling is important for DC (dendritic cell) function and TH1 alloimmune responses. Our results demonstrate that acute rejection of both fully allogeneic skin and cardiac allografts occurs in the absence of MyD88. However, priming of naïve recipient T cells by allogeneic DCs and TH1 immune responses were diminished in the absence of MyD88, although TH2 immunity remained intact. Thus, these results demonstrate that MyD88 signaling is important for DC function and TH1 responses during fully MHC‐mismatched solid‐organ transplantation, although graft rejection occurs independently of MyD88.     

Potential Role of NKG2D and Its Ligands in Organ Transplantation: New Target for Immunointervention

NKG2D is one of the best characterized activating receptors on Natural Killer (NK) and CD8+ T cells. This receptor recognizes several different ligands (MICA/MICB and ULBPs) induced by cellular stress and infection. In addition to the role described in cancer surveillance, recent data highlight the importance of NKG2D and its ligands in organ transplantation. Allografts show evidence of MICA and MICB expression in both acute and chronic rejection. The presence of anti-MICA antibodies has been correlated with incidence of graft rejection. Furthermore, NKG2D-ligand engagement activates NK cells, which provides T-cell costimulation, and enhances antigen specific CTL-mediated cytotoxicity. Activated NK cells may function as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity associated with transplantation. Activated NK cells in response to IL-15 can also trigger organ rejection through NKG2D and affect the maturation of both donor and recipient antigen presenting cells (APCs) and ultimately the T-cell allogeneic response. Regulatory T cells, which modulate T-cell responses in organ transplantation and infections, were reduced in numbers by NK cells exposed to intracellular pathogens, possibly via interaction with one NK2GD receptor. Blockage of NKG2D-NKG2D-L interactions provides a novel pathway for development of inhibitors. These studies have important clinical and therapeutic implications in solid organ transplantation.     

Emerging role of innate immunity in organ transplantation part II: potential of damage-associated molecular patterns to generate immunostimulatory dendritic cells

Part 2 of the review focuses on the potential of oxidative injury-induced damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) to generate immunostimulatory dendritic cells (DCs) translating innate to adaptive immunity. Four different classes of DAMPs are defined, and their potential role in mediating pathways contributing to maturation of immunostimulatory DCs is explored and discussed. Accordingly, injury-induced molecules are divided into (1) class I DAMPs that, when recognized by pattern recognition receptors of DCs, trigger their activation; (2) class II DAMPs that are recognized by special activating receptors on innate lymphocytes that, after activation, contribute to maturation of DCs; (3) class III DAMPs that are recognized by pattern recognition receptors involved in the activation of inflammasomes, that is, molecular platforms that trigger the activation of proinflammatory cytokines promoting maturation of DCs; and (4) class IV DAMPs in terms of neoantigens that are recognized by preexisting natural immunoglobulin M antibodies, which-via complement activation-are able to aggravate the oxidative tissue injury and, thereby, may indirectly promote maturation of DCs. These new insights into mechanisms of oxidative injury-mediated generation of immunostimulatory DCs are finally discussed by addressing possible novel therapeutic strategies with the aim to prevent the capacity of oxidative injury to induce DAMPs in the donor organ. The ultimate goal of those strategies will be to induce transplant tolerance by avoiding oxidative injury in the donor and the recipient and thereby inhibiting activation of immunostimulatory DCs but promoting activation of tolerogenic DCs.     

Regulatory T‐Cell Counter‐Regulation by Innate Immunity Is a Barrier to Transplantation Tolerance

Innate immune signals foster adaptive immunity through activation of antigen‐presenting cells. Recent in vitro evidence suggests that innate signaling may also contribute to immunity by countering the effects of regulatory T cells (T‐regs), counter‐regulation. We present in vivo evidence using a transgenic skin allograft model that the function of T‐regs is lost in the setting of acute skin transplantation but remains intact when grafts were transplanted 1 month prior to allow surgery‐induced inflammation to abate. Our findings identify T‐reg counter‐regulation as a naturally occurring process that accompanies transplantation and an important barrier to T‐reg–mediated tolerance. Our finding further highlights the central role of regulatory cell deactivation in the initiation of the immune response.     

Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury Enhances Lymphatic Endothelial VEGFR3 and Rejection in Cardiac Allografts

Organ damage and innate immunity during heart transplantation may evoke adaptive immunity with serious consequences. Because lymphatic vessels bridge innate and adaptive immunity, they are critical in immune surveillance; however, their role in ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) in allotransplantation remains unknown. We investigated whether the lymphangiogenic VEGF‐C/VEGFR3 pathway during cardiac allograft IRI regulates organ damage and subsequent interplay between innate and adaptive immunity. We found that cardiac allograft IRI, within hours, increased graft VEGF‐C expression and lymphatic vessel activation in the form of increased lymphatic VEGFR3 and adhesion protein expression. Pharmacological VEGF‐C/VEGFR3 stimulation resulted in early lymphatic activation and later increase in allograft inflammation. In contrast, pharmacological VEGF‐C/VEGFR3 inhibition during cardiac allograft IRI decreased early lymphatic vessel activation with subsequent dampening of acute and chronic rejection. Genetic deletion of VEGFR3 specifically in the lymphatics of the transplanted heart recapitulated the survival effect achieved by pharmacological VEGF‐C/VEGFR3 inhibition. Our results suggest that tissue damage rapidly changes lymphatic vessel phenotype, which, in turn, may shape the interplay of innate and adaptive immunity. Importantly, VEGF‐C/VEGFR3 inhibition during solid organ transplant IRI could be used as lymphatic‐targeted immunomodulatory therapy to prevent acute and chronic rejection.     

Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury: new implications of dendritic cell-endothelial cell interactions

In renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury endothelial cells are a main target. The disturbance of endothelial cell physiology leads to endothelial swelling and narrowing of the blood vessel lumen. We attribute this effect to impairment of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase (NOS). NO is significantly reduced in the course of hypoxia causing dysfunction of the vascular smooth muscle tone. Subsequently to an I/R injury, the inflammatory response results in endothial activation with enhanced dendritic cell (DC) adhesion and migration. Thus, alloreactive leukocytes are recruited to the inflammatory site. Finally, dendritic cell–endothelial cell interactions may play a crucial role in antigen-specific allograft rejection in I/R renal injury. DCs, which activate naïve alloreactive T cells, play a central role in the establishment of alloantigen-specific immunity. In the course of hypoxia rejection is initiated at the activated layer of foreign endothelial cells (EC), which forms an immunogenic barrier for migrating DCs and T cells. Host DCs that bind to postischemic activated ECs invade the allografted tissues, or remain stationary in the subendothelial layer, or transmigrate into lymphoid vessels and secondary lymphoid organs, where they present alloantigens to naïve host T cells. Organ rejection is mediated by host alloreactive T cells, which are activated by donor DCs (direct activation) or host DCs (indirect activation). We hypothesized that DC–EC binding and migration is the first step in the renal I/R injury that mediates allotransplant rejection. We sought to better understand the downstream events of a renal I/R injury by understanding DC binding and migration, thereby seeking new strategies for more specific immunomodulatory interventions. Herein we developed a new allotransplant-rejection model after renal I/R injury.     

Activation of Natural Killer Cells and Macrophages by Porcine Endothelial Cells Augments Specific T-Cell Xenoresponse

The rejection of xenografts is characterized by infiltration of monocytes and natural killer (NK) cells into the graft, suggesting an important role for the innate immune system in xenorecognition. In this study, purified human NK or T cells were cocultured with porcine endothelial cells, and cytokines were analyzed by ELISA and intracellular FACS. We demonstrated a vigorous human anti-porcine xenoresponse that was associated with a strong T-cell proliferation against porcine endothelial cells. Limiting dilution cloning and T-cell receptor (TCR) Vbeta gene usage revealed a low number of xenoreactive T-cell precursors. We demonstrated that xenogeneic porcine but not allogeneic human endothelial cells induced the early production of interferon (IFN)-gamma by human NK cells but not by CD3+ T cells. Porcine xenoantigen-induced IFN-gamma production was only partially dependent on IL-12. Blocking IL-12 with neutralizing antibodies or by depletion of human macrophages partially decreased IFN-gamma production by CD56+ NK cells. Three-color flow cytometry revealed that IL-12 was produced through a species-specific activation of human macrophages by porcine endothelial cells. Our results indicate that the direct activation of NK cells and macrophages by porcine endothelial cells provides a unique pathway of xenorecognition that augments downstream specific T-cell immunity and represents a powerful effector mechanism in xenograft rejection.     

Innate immunity alone is not sufficient for chronic rejection but predisposes healed allografts to T cell-mediated pathology

BackgroundAcute allograft rejection is dependent on adaptive immunity, but it is unclear whether the same is true for chronic rejection. Here we asked whether innate immunity alone is sufficient for causing chronic rejection of mouse cardiac allografts.MethodsWe transplanted primarily vascularized cardiac grafts to recombinase activating gene-knockout (RAG^?/?) mice that lack T and B cells but have an intact innate immune system. Recipients were left unmanipulated, received adjuvants that stimulate innate immunity, or were reconstituted with B-1 lymphocytes to generate natural IgM antibodies. In a second model, we transplanted cardiac allografts to mice that lack secondary lymphoid tissues (splenectomized aly/aly recipients) and studied the effect of NK cell inactivation on T cell-mediated chronic rejection.ResultsAcute cardiac allograft rejection was not observed in any of the recipients. Histological analysis of allografts harvested 50 to 90 days after transplantation to RAG^?/? mice failed to identify chronic vascular or parenchymal changes beyond those observed in control syngeneic grafts. Chronic rejection of cardiac allografts parked in splenectomized aly/aly mice was observed only after the transfer of exogenously activated T cells. NK inactivation throughout the experiment, or during the parking period alone, reduced the severity of T cell-dependent chronic rejection.ConclusionsThe innate immune system alone is not sufficient for causing chronic rejection. NK cells predispose healed allografts to T cell-dependent chronic rejection and may contribute to chronic allograft pathology.     

Multi-directional cross-regulation of NK cell function during innate immune responses

In recent years a number of studies allowed major advances in our understanding of different cell types of the innate immunity and of the role they play during the early phases of infections. Some of these cells, such as mast cells, endothelial cells and certain immature dendritic cells (iDCs), are resident within peripheral tissues, while others, including NK cells, are rapidly recruited from blood stream. These studies indicated that innate immunity cells interact each other in inflamed tissues and in secondary lymphoid organs leading to modulation or amplification of different innate effector mechanisms and that a large array of microbial products can directly activate different effector cells of the innate immunity, also including NK cells. The final outcome of these cellular interactions may have dramatic impact on the quality and strength of down-stream adaptive immune responses. Noticeably, the effect on the adaptive immunity can result not only from the action of polarizing cytokines such as IL12 or IL4, but also from the NK-mediated "DC editing" leading to the selection of the most suitable DCs for subsequent priming of Th1 cell responses. Thus classical innate effector cells can also be viewed as regulatory cells that play a pivotal role in defenses against pathogens.     

Graft produced interleukin-6 functions as a danger signal and promotes rejection after transplantation

BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that functions in both the innate and adaptive immune responses. However, the role of IL-6 in allograft rejection remains poorly understood. METHODS: In this study, we demonstrate a critical role for graft-produced IL-6 in allograft rejection in a murine model of cardiac allograft transplantation. RESULTS: The results show that IL-6-deficient grafts transplanted into allogeneic wild-type recipients have significantly prolonged survival, approximately three times the survival time of wild-type controls. In contrast, allogeneic cardiac transplants into IL-6-deficient recipients do not have prolonged graft survival, indicating that donor graft cells are the relevant source of IL-6. Our investigation of potential mechanisms shows that graft-produced IL-6 promotes the activation of peripheral CD4 and CD8 T cells. Furthermore, we show that IL-6 deficiency prolongs graft survival only in the presence of CD25+ T cells that have a phenotype consistent with regulatory T cells. Interestingly, IL-6 production by the graft is triggered by antigen-independent innate immune mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, our results suggest the paradigm that graft rejection versus tolerance is determined by a balance between the activation of effector T cells versus immune suppression by regulatory T cells, and that after transplantation, IL-6 functions as a systemic danger signal that overcomes constitutive immune suppression mediated by regulatory T cells and promotes the activation of effector T cells.     

Immunology of vascularized composite allotransplantation: a primer for hand surgeons

Vascularized composite allotransplantation is a recent innovation in the fields of transplantation surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, and orthopedic surgery. The success of hand and face transplantation has been based on extensive experience in solid organ transplantation. Advances in understanding the immunology of transplantation have had a major role in achieving excellent results in this new field. The purpose of this article is to introduce the basics of human immunology (innate and adaptive systems) and the immunological basis of human transplantation (the importance of human leukocyte antigen, direct and indirect pathways of antigen recognition, the 3 signals for T-cell activation, and mechanisms and types of allograft rejection) and focus on the mode of action of immunosuppressive drugs that have evolved as the mechanisms and pathways for rejection have been defined through research. This includes recent studies involving the use of costimulatory blockade, regulatory T cells, and tolerance induction that have resulted from research in understanding the mechanisms of immune recognition and function.     

Type I Interferons Are Not Critical for Skin Allograft Rejection or the Generation of Donor-Specific CD8+ Memory T Cells

Type I interferons (IFN-I) link innate to adaptive immunity in microbial infection, autoimmune disease and tumor immunity. It is not known whether IFN-I have an equally central role in alloimmunity. Here we tested this possibility by studying skin allograft survival and donor-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses in mice that lack the IFN-I receptor (IFN-IR^−/−). We found that IFN-IR^−/− mice reject fully allogeneic wild-type skin grafts at the same rate as wild-type recipients. Similarly, allograft rejection was not delayed if IFN-IR^−/− male skin was transplanted to syngeneic IFN-IR^−/− female mice. Quantitation of the male (H-Y)-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response in these mice revealed normal generation of donor-specific CD8⁺ effector T cells but fourfold reduction in CD8⁺ memory T cells. Memory CD8⁺ T cells generated in the absence of IFN-IR had normal phenotype and recall function, assessed by ex vivo cytokine production and the ability of IFN-IR^−/− mice to mount second set rejection. Finally, these memory T cells were maintained at a constant number despite their inability to respond to IFN-1. Our findings indicate that IFN-I cytokines are not critical for acute allograft rejection or for the expansion and differentiation of donor-specific CD8⁺ T cells into long-lived, functional memory T cells.     

Proteasome inhibitor-based therapy for antibody-mediated rejection

The development of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) following renal transplantation significantly reduces long-term renal graft function and survival. The traditional therapies for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) have provided inconsistent results and transient effects that may be due to a failure to deplete mature antibody-producing plasma cells. Proteasome inhibition (PI) is a novel AMR therapy that deletes plasma cells. Initial reports of PI-based AMR treatment in refractory rejection demonstrated the ability of bortezomib to deplete plasma cells producing DSA, reduce DSA levels, provide histological improvement or resolution, and improve renal allograft function. These results have subsequently been confirmed in a multicenter collaborative study. PI has also been shown to provide effective primary AMR therapy in case reports. Recent studies have demonstrated that PI therapy results in differential responses in early and late post-transplant AMR. Additional randomized studies are evaluating the role of PI in transplant induction, acute AMR, and chronic rejection in renal transplantation. An important theoretical advantage of PI-based regimens is derived from several potential strategies for achievement of synergy.     

Acute allograft rejection occurs independently of inducible heat shock protein-70

Dendritic cells (DCs) are key mediators of the innate response to transplantation. Yet, the substances that activate these cells during acute allograft rejection remain elusive. Previous work has suggested that heat shock protein (HSP)-70 is associated with acute allograft rejection. Hence, the goal of this study was to determine whether HSP-70 activates DCs and plays a critical role in acute allograft rejection in an experimental model that is dependent on innate MyD88 signaling. Our in vitro data indicate that HSP-70 does not activate DCs. In vivo transplant studies demonstrate that HSP-70 levels are not increased during acute allograft rejection and that an absence of the inducible form of HSP-70 neither delays acute allograft rejection, impairs DCs maturation, nor alters Th1 immune responses during acute allograft rejection. In conclusion, our results indicate that HSP-70 in our experimental models does not play an essential role in acute allograft rejection.     

Advances in diagnosing and managing antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a unique, significant, and often severe form of allograft rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications. Significant advances have occurred in our ability to predict patients at risk for, and to diagnose, AMR. These advances include the development of newer anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody detection techniques and assays for non-HLA antibodies associated with AMR. The pathophysiology of AMR suggests a prime role for antibodies, B cells and plasma cells, but other effector molecules, especially the complement system, point to potential targets that could modify the AMR process. An emerging and potentially larger problem is the development of chronic AMR (CAMR) resulting from de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) that emerge more than 100 days posttransplantation. Therapeutic options include: (1) High-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has many potential benefits. (2) The use of IVIG + rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B cell). (3) The combination of plasmapheresis (PP) + low-dose IVIG with or without rituximab. Data support the efficacy of all of the above approaches. Newer approaches to treating AMR include using the proteosome inhibitor (bortezomib), which induces apoptosis in plasma cells, and eculizumab (anti-C5, anticomplement monoclonal antibody).     

Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the rejection of heart or islet xenografts in recipients with xenotolerance in the innate immune compartment

To further study the interactions between innate and adaptive immunity in xenotransplantation, we explored the relative contribution of T-cell subsets in vascularized (heart) and cellular (islets) xenografts in a model with established xeno-non-reactivity of the innate system. MATERIALS: Specific innate xenotolerance was induced in xenoheart (hamster) recipients (nude rats) by a tolerizing regimen (TR), consisting of donor antigen infusion, temporary natural killer (NK)-cell depletion and a 4-week administration of leflunomide. Hamster pancreatic islets were transplanted either 1 week after heart transplantation or alone and syngeneic T-cell adoptive transfer was performed 10 days later. Purified CD3(+), CD4(+), and CD8(+) T cells were given 2 weeks after withdrawal of all drugs. At the day of rejection, xenografts were removed for histology. Serum was taken and IgM and IgG xenoantibody titers were measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Both heart and islet grafts were rejected after CD4(+) reconstitution. After CD8(+) T-cell adoptive transfer, cellular grafts were not rejected but vascularized grafts were rejected, although only after several months. Rejection in CD4(+) reconstituted nude rats was accompanied by the generation of predominantly IgG xenoantibodies. CONCLUSION: CD4(+) T lymphocytes are able to rapidly initiate the rejection of islet xenografts in the presence of a xenotolerant innate immune system either by breaking the "innate tolerance" (e.g., by activating macrophages and NK-cells) or through a mechanism without any involvement of the innate tolerance (e.g., T-dependent IgG antibody production). In contrast, CD8(+) T cells provoke a late rejection of only xenoheart grafts.