p53 mutations and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in a multicenter study on lung cancer

Biomarker data may provide a way to strengthen the link between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and lung cancer shown in epidemiological studies. We conducted a multicenter case-control study to investigate the association between ETS exposure and lung cancer in never-smokers using p53 mutations as a biomarker of tobacco-related carcinogenesis. Paraffin-embedded tissue or fresh tissue samples from 91 never-smokers and 66 smokers with histologically confirmed lung cancer and interview data about smoking habits and ETS exposure were analyzed for mutations in the p53 gene. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression. Among the lifelong nonsmokers, the overall mutation prevalence was 10% (nine cases). Among 48 never-smokers ever exposed to spousal ETS, 13% (six cases) showed mutations. Smokers exhibited 17 (26%) mutations. A 3-fold [odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-7.2] increased risk of p53 mutation was observed for smokers as compared with all never-smokers combined (i.e., irrespective of ETS exposure). The increase was 4.4-fold (95% CI, 1.2-16.2) when compared with never-smokers without ETS exposure. Among never-smokers, the risk of mutation was doubled (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.5-8.7) for exposure to spousal ETS only, based on 6 exposed cases with mutation and 42 exposed cases without mutation. The risk was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.2-8.8) for those ever exposed to spousal or workplace ETS as compared with those never exposed to spousal or workplace ETS. For smokers, the most common mutation type was G:C to T:A transversion (31%), whereas G:C to A:T transitions were predominant among never smokers (57%). In conclusion, our study indicates a significant 3-4-fold increased risk of p53 mutation in smoking lung cancer cases, and it suggests that mechanisms of lung carcinogenesis in ETS-exposed never-smokers include mutations in the p53 gene, similar to that seen in smokers. However, the mutation patterns observed also suggest a difference between smokers and never-smokers. Clearly, additional investigations of the role of p53 mutation as a biomarker for tobacco-related carcinogenesis, including that related to ETS, are indicated.     

Lifetime residential and workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in never-smoking women, Canada 1994-97

Although the risk of lung cancer among never-smokers living with a spouse who smokes has been extensively studied, the impact of lifetime residential and workplace environmental tobacco smoke has received less attention. As part of a large population-based case-control study of lung cancer, we collected lifetime residential and occupational passive smoking information from 71 women with lung cancer and 761 healthy control subjects, all of whom reported being lifetime nonsmokers. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for lung cancer associated with residential passive exposure only was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-2.8). Although more years of and more intense residential passive smoke exposure tended to be associated with higher risk estimates, no clear dose-response relationship was evident. The OR for women with passive exposure as a child and as an adult was 1.63 (95% CI 0.8-3.5) and for those only exposed as an adult 1.20 (95%CI 0.5-3.0). Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke only in the workplace was associated with an adjusted OR of 1.27 (95% CI 0.4-4.0). Risks associated with increasing occupational exposure year tertiles were 1.24, 1.71 and 1.71. Total smoker-years of residential and occupational exposure combined resulted in a statistically significant trend (linear test for trend p = 0.05) with ORs for tertiles of exposure of 0.83, 1.54 and 1.82. Our results are consistent with the literature suggesting that long-term, regular exposure to either residential or occupational environmental tobacco smoke is associated with increased lung cancer risk in never-smoking women.     

Risk factors for lung cancer among nonsmoking women

To evaluate risk factors for lung cancer in nonsmoking women, we used data of a case-control study conducted between 1991 and 1996 in Germany. A total of 234 female histologically confirmed lung cancer patients and 535 population controls who had never smoked more than 400 cigarettes in their lifetime were personally interviewed with respect to occupation, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), family history of cancer, prior physician-diagnosed lung diseases or cancer and diet. One-year radon measurements in the last dwelling were performed. Odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age and region and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated via logistic regression. When cumulative duration of exposure to ETS in hours was considered, the OR for high compared to not or low ETS exposed women was 2.62 (CI:1.35-5.06) for occupational exposure and OR=1.67 (CI:0.86-3.25) for spousal exposure, exhibiting a significant trend for ETS at work. Working more than 10 years in jobs or industries with known or suspected lung carcinogens was associated with OR=2.0 (CI:0.99-4.0). An elevated risk due to prior lung diseases was present for pneumonia (OR=1.6; CI:1.07-2.40) and tuberculosis (OR=1.6; CI:0.77-3.37). No significant increase in risk with increasing residential radon levels or with the presence of a family history of lung cancer was apparent. Protective effects were observed for high vs. low consumption of fresh vegetables (OR=0.5; CI:0.25-0.82) and cheese (OR=0.3, CI:0.21-0.55). ETS at work, occupational hazards and previous pneumonia may be risk factors for lung cancer in nonsmoking women, while a diet rich in fresh vegetables and cheese seems to be protective.     

A case–control study of lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmoking women living in Shanghai, China

Introduction: The incidence of lung cancer in women living in China is among the highest in the world but it does not appear that tobacco smoking is a major risk factor for lung cancer. As tobacco smoking is highly prevalent in Chinese men, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) may play an important role in the development of lung cancer in Chinese women who never smoked. We conducted the present investigation because previous studies did not account for dietary habits or indoor air pollution from Chinese-style cooking and they did not assess the effect of occupational exposure to ETS.Methods: A population-based, case–control study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between lung cancer and exposure to ETS among nonsmoking women living in Shanghai, China. Five-hundred and four women diagnosed with incident, primary lung cancer between February 1992 and January 1994 were identified through the population-based Shanghai Cancer Registry. A control group of 601 nonsmoking women was selected randomly from the Shanghai Residential Registry, and was approximately frequency-matched to the age distribution of the lung cancer cases. Information on lifetime domestic and occupational exposure to ETS was obtained through face-to-face interviews. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression.Results: The OR for ever exposed to ETS from spouses was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8–1.5), and the OR for ever exposed to ETS at work was 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3–2.3). Furthermore, the OR increased with increasing number of hours of daily exposure to ETS in the workplace and with increasing number of smoking co-workers. No associations were found for exposure to ETS during childhood.Conclusions: The main findings of the present study are that long-term occupational exposure to ETS, both alone or in combination with exposures at home, conferred an increased risk of lung cancer among women who never smoked. The inconsistency of the results regarding exposure to ETS at home and at work may have been due to lower exposures at home.     

DNA repair capacity and lung cancer risk in never smokers.

Besides secondhand smoke exposure, few other risk factors for lung cancer in lifetime never smokers have been identified. We present the estimates of lung cancer risk associated with suboptimal DNA repair capacity (DRC) measured by the host-cell reactivation assay in lifetime never smokers using data from 219 cases and 309 matched controls enrolled in a case-control study. Suboptimal DRC level (below the control median) conferred a significantly increased lung cancer risk in never smokers [odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.3-2.9; P = 0.0024]. There was a 3.38-fold risk for individuals with DRC below the first quartile (95% CI, 1.8-6.3) compared with individuals with DRC above the third quartile. Secondhand smoke exposure in individuals with DRC below the control median was associated with a 3.81-fold risk of lung cancer (95% CI, 2.3-6.4). A 2.49-fold (95% CI, 1.1-5.6) risk was noted for the joint effects of lung cancer family history in first-degree relatives and suboptimal DRC. Relatives of probands (cases and controls) with lowest DRC (below the first quartile) were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer (odds ratio, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.1-6.7) compared with relatives of probands with the most proficient DRC (above the third quartile). Relatives of probands with suboptimal (below the control median) versus proficient DRC also had an earlier age at diagnosis with lung cancer, although the only statistically significant difference was in female relatives (55.4 versus 67.7 years; P = 0.03).     

Passive smoking and lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women: a prospective study

Although smoking is a major cause of lung cancer, the proportion of lung cancer cases among Japanese women who never smoked is high. As the prevalence of smoking in Japan is relatively high in men but low in women, the development of lung cancer in non-smoking Japanese women may be significantly impacted by passive smoking. We conducted a population-based prospective study established in 1990 for Cohort I and in 1993 for Cohort II. The study population was defined as all residents aged 40-69 years at the baseline survey. 28,414 lifelong non-smoking women provided baseline information on exposure to tobacco smoke from their husband, at the workplace and during childhood. Over 13 years of follow-up, 109 women were newly diagnosed with lung cancer, of whom 82 developed adenocarcinoma. Compared with women married to never smokers, hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for all lung cancer incidence in women who lived with a smoking husband was 1.34 (95% CI 0.81-2.21). An association was clearly identified for adenocarcinoma (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.07-3.86), for which dose-response relationships were seen for both the intensity (p for trend = 0.02) and amount (p for trend = 0.03) of the husband's smoking. Passive smoking at the workplace also increased the risk of lung cancer (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.85-2.04). Moreover, a higher risk of adenocarcinoma was seen for combined husband and workplace exposure (HR 1.93, 95% CI 0.88-4.23). These findings confirm that passive smoking is a risk factor for lung cancer, especially for adenocarcinoma among Japanese women.     

Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer risk in nonsmoking women.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (passive smoking) has been suggested to be a cause of lung cancer, although early epidemiologic studies have produced inconsistent results. PURPOSE: We conducted an epidemiologic case-control study to assess the relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer risk among women who have never smoked (i.e., having smoked for a total of less than 6 months or having smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetimes). METHODS: Case patients (n = 210) were women with histologically confirmed primary carcinomas of the lung who were lifetime nonsmokers. They were identified through hospital tumor registries and the Florida Cancer Data System of the Statewide Cancer Registry. Community-based control women (n = 301) were also lifetime nonsmokers and were identified through random-digit dialing. Details on childhood and adulthood exposures to environmental tobacco smoke were ascertained through interviews with the study participants themselves or with surrogate respondents. Risks were calculated in terms of smoke-years, defined as the sum of the reported years of exposure to cigarette smoke from each smoker in the household. RESULTS: The risk of lung cancer more than doubled for women who reported 40 or more smoke-years of household exposure during adulthood (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-5.3) or 22 or more smoke-years of exposure during childhood and adolescence (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.1-5.4). Risks were highest for non-adenocarcinoma lung cancers, although modest elevations in risk were also observed for adenocarcinomas. When a surrogate respondent other than the patient's husband provided information on exposure, the risk estimates were considerably lower. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that long-term exposure to environmental tobacco smoke increases the risk of lung cancer in women who have never smoked.     

Passive smoking and lung cancer in Chandigarh, India.

The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and lung cancer in non-smokers, a case-control study among lifetime non-smokers was conducted in Chandigarh, India. Cases consisted of 58 non-smoking histologically confirmed lung cancer patients; two controls for each case were selected, one among other patients admitted to the wards and one among the visitors to hospital patients. Subjects were asked about ETS exposure from different tobacco products in childhood and in adulthood at home, at the work place and in vehicles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effects of the ETS exposure variables on lung cancer. Exposure to ETS during childhood was strongly associated with lung cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 3.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.9-8.2), the effect mostly arising from exposure to cigarettes smoke. The excess risk was observed with either a smoking father or mother. An increasing risk was found with increasing number of smokers and duration of exposure. Restricting the analysis to women produced higher estimates of the risk. No increased risk was found with exposure to a smoking spouse, except for those exposed only to cigarette smoke (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.5-17). A weak association was seen between lung cancer and ETS exposure at the workplace, which increased with the number of years of exposure. Exposure in vehicles also was detected as a risk factor for lung cancer in non-smokers. This study suggests that ETS exposure may be a strong risk factor for lung cancer also in India, a country with low prevalence of smoking and, therefore, low rates of lung cancer. Other studies need to be conducted in similar settings to confirm the role played by ETS exposure early in life in the causation of lung cancer.     

Lung cancer in lifetime nonsmoking men - results of a case-control study in Germany

Epidemiological studies of lung cancer among nonsmoking men are few. This case-control study was conducted among lifetime nonsmoking men between 1990 and 1996 in Germany to examine lung cancer risk in relation to occupation, environmental tobacco smoke, residential radon, family history of cancer and previous lung disease. A total of 58 male cases with confirmed primary lung cancer and 803 male population controls who had never smoked more than 400 cigarettes in their lifetime were personally interviewed by a standardized questionnaire. In addition, 1-year radon measurements in the living and bedroom of the subjects' last dwelling were carried out. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Having ever worked in a job with known lung carcinogens was associated with a two-fold significantly increased lung cancer risk (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.0-5.0), adjusted for age and region. The linear trend test for lung-cancer risk associated with radon exposure was close to statistical significance, demonstrating an excess relative risk for an increase in exposure of 100 Bq m(-3)of 0.43 (P = 0.052). Nonsignificantly elevated effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in public transportation and in social settings were observed. No associations with a family history of cancer or previous lung diseases were found. Our results indicate that occupational carcinogens and indoor radon may play a role in some lung cancers in nonsmoking men.     

Never smokers and lung cancer risk: a case-control study of epidemiological factors

We performed an analysis of potential epidemiological risk factors for lung cancer using data from 280 cases and 242 hospital-based controls, all lifetime never smokers (those who had smoked <100 cigarettes in their lifetimes) and frequency matched on age, gender and ethnicity. The data on demographic characteristics, medical history of respiratory diseases (asthma, emphysema, pneumonia and hay fever), weight and height, family history, female characteristics and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and dust exposure were derived from personal interviews. We performed a logistic regression analysis of these variables adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, income and years of education. Exposure to ETS (OR = 2.08, 95% CI [1.25-3.43]) and dusts (OR = 2.43, 95% CI [1.53-3.88]) were associated with significantly increased risk. In the analysis for joint effects, exposure to both ETS and dusts conferred a higher risk (OR = 3.25, 95% CI [1.58-6.70]) than exposure to either alone. Family history of any cancer with onset before age 50 in at least 1 first degree relative was a significant risk predictor (OR = 1.70, 95% CI [1.10-2.64]). Individuals with a self-reported physician-diagnosed history of hay fever, but not asthma, had a decreased lung cancer risk (OR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.35-0.92]). In the multivariate analysis, exposure to ETS and dusts, and family history of cancer with onset before age 50 were significant risk factors, while a history of hay fever (occurring without asthma) was significantly protective.     

Passive smoking and breast cancer risk among non-smoking Chinese women

Our purpose was to evaluate whether passive exposure to cigarette smoke may be related to breast cancer risk. Data from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, a large population-based study of 1459 breast cancer cases and 1556 controls aged 25-64 years, were analyzed. Respective response rates were 91.1% and 90.3%. Passive smoking questions were added to all face-to-face interviews 7 months into the study. Women were asked about exposure to their husbands' smoke at home as well as exposure in the workplace. Analyses were restricted to the 1013 cases and 1117 controls with passive tobacco smoke exposure data who had never actively smoked. Over 60% of controls reported some exposure to a husband's smoke and over 40% reported exposure to passive smoke in the workplace. Overall, there was no apparent association between any passive smoke exposure or exposure to a husband's smoke and breast cancer risk. There was some evidence of an elevated breast cancer risk associated with passive smoking exposure of 5 hr or more per day in the workplace (OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.4; p for trend = 0.02). This association warrants further investigation.     

Secondhand smoke exposure in early life and the risk of breast cancer among never smokers (United States)

Evidence is increasing that some early life exposures affect breast cancer risk. Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) during childhood may be one such exposure. As part of the WEB Study (Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer Study), we conducted a population-based, case-control study with 1166 women aged 35 to 79 diagnosed with histologically confirmed, primary, incident breast cancer. Controls (n = 2105) were randomly selected from the Department of Motor Vehicles driver’s license list (≤age 65) and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services rolls (>age 65). Participants were queried regarding household and workplace SHS exposure. Person-years of lifetime cumulative SHS exposure were computed as well as cumulative exposure up to 21 years of age. Unconditional logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Lifetime cumulative exposure to household SHS was not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk for premenopausal (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.54–2.56) or postmenopausal (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.82–2.01) women. Neither was risk increased among women exposed to SHS before the age of 21 or at the time of birth, menarche, or a women’s first birth. In this study, exposure to SHS either in adult or early life does not appear to be associated with the risk of breast cancer.     

High-Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Among Never Smokers Versus Ever Smokers With Lung Cancer

IntroductionAir pollution may play an important role in the development of lung cancer in people who have never smoked, especially among East Asian women. The aim of this study was to compare cumulative ambient air pollution exposure between ever and never smokers with lung cancer.MethodsA consecutive case series of never and ever smokers with newly diagnosed lung cancer were compared regarding their sex, race, and outdoor and household air pollution exposure. Using individual residential history, cumulative exposure to outdoor particulate matter (PM_2.5) in a period of 20 years was quantified with a high-spatial resolution global exposure model.ResultsOf the 1005 patients with lung cancer, 56% were females and 33% were never smokers. Compared with ever smokers with lung cancer, never smokers with lung cancer were significantly younger, more frequently Asian, less likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or a family history of lung cancer, and had higher exposure to outdoor PM_2.5 but lower exposure to secondhand smoke. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association with never-smoking patients with lung cancer and being female (OR = 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.76–5.82, p < 0.001), being Asian (OR_{Asian versus non-Asian} = 6.48, 95% CI: 4.42–9.50, p < 0.001), and having greater exposure to air pollution (OR_{ln_PM2.5} = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.10–7.2.90, p = 0.019).ConclusionsCompared with ever-smoking patients with lung cancer, never-smoking patients had strong associations with being female, being Asian, and having air pollution exposures. Our results suggest that incorporation of cumulative exposure to ambient air pollutants be considered when assessing lung cancer risk in combination with traditional risk factors.     

Parakeets, canaries, finches, parrots and lung cancer: no association.

The relationship between pet bird keeping and lung cancer according to exposure to tobacco smoking was investigated in a case-control study in hospitals of New York City and Washington, DC, USA. Newly diagnosed lung cancer cases (n = 887) aged 40-79 years were compared with 1350 controls with diseases not related to smoking, of the same age, gender and date of admission as the cases. The prevalence of pet bird keeping was 12.5% in men and 19.1% in women. There was no association between ever keeping a pet bird and lung cancer in never smokers (men adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-3.17; women, 1.32, 95% CI 0.65-2.70), or in smokers and non-smokers combined, after adjustment for ever smoking (men: 1.28, 95% CI 0.88-1.86; women: 1.17, 95% CI 0.83-1.64; all: 1.21, 95% CI 0.95-1.56). Risk did not increase in relation to duration of pet bird keeping. Cases and controls kept similar types of birds. There was a tenfold increase of lung cancer risk associated with smoking among non-bird keepers (adjusted OR = 9.15). There was no indication of a synergism, either additive or multiplicative, between smoking and pet bird keeping with respect to lung cancer risk. Either alone or in conjunction with smoking, keeping parakeets, canaries, finches or parrots is not a risk factor for lung cancer among hospital patients in New York and in Washington, DC.     

Indoor air pollution and pulmonary adenocarcinoma among females: a case-control study in Shenyang, China

Factors that affect the risk of lung adenocarcinoma among females were investigated in Shenyang, China, using a population-based case-control study design. A total of 72 new cases, ages 35-69, diagnosed with incident, primary pulmonary adenocarnoma, were collected between April 1991 and December 1995, and were 1:1 age-matched with healthy females randomly selected from the general population. A questionnaire covering demographics, diet/nutritional preferences and cooking habits, living conditions, family history of cancer, sources of indoor/outdoor/occupational pollution, exposure to ETS from spousal smoking, workplace exposure, and exposure during childhood, history of menstruation and pregnancy, was given to each subject in a structured in-person interview given by trained field workers. Univariate analysis was performed on the data collected. The results showed that cooking fumes, family history of lung cancer, economic status, and number of live births and intake of vitamin E were risk factors significantly associated with adenocarcinoma of the lung. In particular, exposure to different levels of cooking fumes, an indoor air pollutant, increased the odds ratio of lung adenocarcinoma by 1.33, 7.33 and 1.67, respectively (trend p=0.006). Another important risk factor was family history of lung cancer, which gave an OR of 7.65 (95% CI, 0.90-169.84). Intake of beta-carotene from vegetables and fruit offered protection against lung adenocarcinoma, giving an OR of 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12-0.69). These results were confirmed by multivariable logistic regression analysis.     

Passive and active smoking and breast cancer risk in Canada, 1994–97

Background: Studies comparing ever smokers with never smokers have found little increase in breast cancer risk. However, the five published studies examining passive smoking and breast cancer have all suggested associations with both passive and active smoking, particularly premenopausal risk. Methods: We analyzed data collected through the Canadian National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance System, from 805 premenopausal and 1512 postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed (incident), histologically confirmed, primary breast cancer and 2438 population controls. The mailed questionnaire included questions on breast cancer risk factors and a lifetime residential and occupational history of exposure to passive smoking. Results: Among premenopausal women who were never active smokers, regular exposure to passive smoke was associated with an adjusted breast cancer odds ratio (OR) of 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–4.6). Passive exposure showed a strong dose–response trend (test for trend p=0.0007) with an OR of 2.9 (95% CI 1.3–6.6) for more than 35 years of passive residential and/or occupational exposure. When premenopausal women who had ever actively smoked were compared with women never regularly exposed to passive or active smoke, the adjusted OR for breast cancer was also 2.3 (95% CI 1.2–4.5). Among postmenopausal women who were never-active smokers, regular exposure to passive smoke was associated with an adjusted breast cancer OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.8–1.8) and an OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.9–2.3) for the most highly exposed quartile of women. The adjusted OR for postmenopausal breast cancer risk for ever-active smokers compared with women never regularly exposed to passive or active smoke was 1.5 (95% CI 1.0–2.3). Statistically significant dose–response relationships were observed with increasing years of smoking, increasing pack-years and decreasing years since quitting. Women with 35 or more years of smoking had an adjusted OR of 1.7 (95% CI 1.1–2.7). Conclusions: Active and passive smoking may be associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly premenopausal risk.     

Active and passive smoking with breast cancer risk for Chinese females:a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous studies suggested that smoking and passive smoking could increase the risk of breast cancer, but the results were inconsistent, especial y for Chinese females. Thus, we systematical y searched cohort and case-control studies investigating the associations of active and passive smoking with breast cancer risk among Chinese females in four English databases （PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Wiley） and three Chinese databases （CNKI, WanFang, and VIP）. Fifty-one articles （3 cohort studies and 48 case-control studies） covering 17 provinces of China were finally included in this systematic review. Among Chinese females, there was significant association between passive smoking and this risk of breast cancer [odds ratio （OR）： 1.62; 95% confidence interval （CI）： 1.39-1.85; I2 = 75.8%, P 〈 0.001; n = 26] but no significant association between active smoking and the risk of breast cancer （OR：1.04;95%CI：0.89-1.20;I2=13.9%, P=0.248;n=31）. The OR of exposure to husband’s smoking and to smoke in the workplace was 1.27 （95% CI： 1.07-1.50） and 1.66 （95% CI： 1.07-2.59）, respectively. The OR of light and heavy passive smoking was 1.11 and 1.41, respectively, for women exposed to their husband’s smoke （〈20 and≥20 cigarettes per day）, and 1.07 and 1.87, respectively, for those exposed to smoke in the workplace （〈300 and≥300 min of exposure per day）. These results imply that passive smoking is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, and the risk seems to increase as the level of passive exposure to smoke increases among Chinese females. Women with passive exposure to smoke in the workplace have a higher risk of breast cancer than those exposed to their husband’s smoking.     

Risk factors for breast cancer in Turkish women with early pregnancies and long-lasting lactation--a case-control study

A hospital-based case-control study was carried out among 504 women with breast cancer and 610 controls to analyse the risk factors for breast cancer in Turkey. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each risk factor were obtained from logistic regression analysis. Risk factors for breast cancer were found to be long-term lactation (> or = 5 years versus never OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.79), young age at menarche (< 15 years versus > or = 15 OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.30-2.28), late age at first full-term pregnancy (> or = 30 versus < 20 OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.32-6.21), oral contraceptive use (ever versus never OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.10-2.08), positive family history (positive versus negative OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.35-5.82), and menstrual irregularity (yes versus no OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.49). The results of the present study will lead to a better understanding of the risk factors for breast cancer in a developing country.     

Associations between smoking, passive smoking, GSTM-1, NAT2, and rectal cancer.

Cigarette smoking has been identified as a risk factor for colon cancer, however, much less is known about the association between cigarette smoking and rectal cancer. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the associations between rectal cancer and active and passive cigarette smoking and other forms of tobacco use. We also evaluate how genetic variants of GSTM-1 and NAT2 alter these associations. A population-based case-control study of 952 incident rectal cancer cases and 1205 controls was conducted. Detailed tobacco use information was collected as part of an interviewer-administered questionnaire. DNA was extracted from blood to examine genetic variants of GSTM-1 and NAT2. Cigarette smoking was associated with an increased risk of rectal cancer in men [odds ratio (OR)=1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-2.1 for current smokers; OR=1.7, 95% CI, 1.3-2.3 for smoking >20 pack-years of cigarettes relative to never-smokers]. After adjusting for active smoking, exposure to cigarette smoke of others also was associated with increased risk among men (OR=1.5, 95% CI, 1.1-2.0). Neither GSTM-1 genotype nor NAT2-imputed phenotype was independently associated with rectal cancer. However, the risk associated with smoking cigarettes among those who were GSTM-1 null relative to those who never smoked and had the GSTM-1 present genotype was OR=2.0 (95% CI, 1.2-3.3). This interaction was of borderline significance (P=0.08). Men who had the combined GSTM-1 present genotype and who were rapid acetylators had no increased risk from cigarette smoking. There were no significant associations between cigarette smoking and rectal cancer among women. This study shows that men who smoke cigarettes, especially those who smoke >20 pack-years, are at increased risk of rectal cancer. This association may be influenced by GSTM-1 genotype. Furthermore, exposure to cigarette smoke of others may increase risk of rectal cancer among men who do not smoke.     

NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) Pro187Ser polymorphism and the risk of lung, bladder, and colorectal cancers: a meta-analysis.

NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the two-electron reduction of quinoid compounds into hydroquinones, their less toxic form. A sequence variant at position 609 (C --> T) in the NQO1 gene encodes an enzyme with reduced quinone reductase activity in vitro and thus was hypothesized to affect cancer susceptibility. We conducted meta-analyses focusing on three cancer sites (lung, bladder, and colorectum) to summarize the findings from the current literature and to explore sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: There is no clear association between the NQO1 Pro187Ser polymorphism and lung cancer risk in the three ethnic groups examined: odds ratio (OR(White)) C/T + T/T versus C/C = 1.04 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.96-1.13], OR(Asian) = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.72-1.34), and OR(Blacks) = 0.95 (95% CI, 0.66-1.36). However, a modestly increased risk was suggested for the variant homozygotes in whites (OR T/T versus C/C, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.94-1.50). Analysis excluding one outlier study suggested the variant allele may be associated with reduced lung cancer risk in Asians. Meta-analyses for bladder and colorectal cancer suggested a statistically significant association with the variant genotypes in whites. In stratified analyses, the NQO1 Pro187Ser variant genotypes were associated with slightly increased lung cancer risk in white ever smokers but not in white never smokers and were mainly associated with a reduced risk of lung adenocarcinoma but not squamous cell carcinoma in Asians. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our meta-analyses suggest that the variant NQO1 Pro187Ser genotype may affect individual susceptibility to lung, bladder, and colorectal cancer. Such effects of the NQO1 polymorphism seem to be modified by ethnicity and smoking status.