Translocation renal cell carcinomas in adults: a single-institution experience

Translocation renal cell carcinoma is a newly recognized subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with chromosomal translocations involving TFE3 (Xp11.2) or, less frequently, TFEB (6p21). Xp11 translocation RCC was originally described as a pediatric neoplasm representing 20% to 40% of pediatric RCCs, with a much lower frequency in the adult population. TFEB translocation RCC is very rare, with approximately 10 cases reported in the literature. Here, we describe the clinicopathologic features of adult translocation RCC from a single institution. Using tissue microarray, immunohistochemistry, cytogenetic examination, and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we identified 6 (～5%) cases of TFE3 translocation RCC and 1 (<1%) case of TFEB translocation RCC in 121 consecutive adult RCC cases between 2001 and 2009. Our results suggest that weak TFE3 staining of a significant proportion of RCC cases may be because of expression of the full-length TFE3 protein rather than the chimeric fusion protein resulting from chromosomal translocation.     

Cytogenetic alterations in renal tumors. Applications for comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization

The WHO classification of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) takes into account chromosomal alterations. New cytogenetic techniques such as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) offer alternative methods to the classic cytogenetic banding technique. Clear cell (classic) RCC frequently show the loss of 3p. Papillary RCC are characterized by trisomies and tetrasomies as well as loss of the Y chromosome. CGH analysis demonstrates that DNA copy increase is more common in type I papillary RCC compared to type II. Chromophobe RCC are characterized by losses in chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21. Oncocytomas can be divided into cases with rearrangements in the 11q13 region and those with loss of chromosome 1 and the sex chromosomes. Translocations involving chromosome 3, such as t(3;8)(p14;q24.13) and t(2;3)(q35;q21) have been described in familial clear cell RCC. The most recent class of RCC, seen only in men, is referred to as translocation tumors. These tumors demonstrate a tubulopapillary growth pattern and have a t(X;1)(p11.2;q21.2) translocation. Although not required for most clinical diagnoses, CGH and FISH complement the standard histologic diagnosis of RCC and may provide a definitive diagnosis in a small number of challenging cases.     

Zytogenetische Veränderungen bei Nierentumoren

The WHO classification of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) takes into account chromosomal alterations. New cytogenetic techniques such as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) offer alternative methods to the classic cytogenetic banding technique. Clear cell (classic) RCC frequently show the loss of 3p. Papillary RCC are characterized by trisomies and tetrasomies as well as loss of the Y chromosome. CGH analysis demonstrates that DNA copy increase is more common in type I papillary RCC compared to type II. Chromophobe RCC are characterized by losses in chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21. Oncocytomas can be divided into cases with rearrangements in the 11q13 region and those with loss of chromosome 1 and the sex chromosomes. Translocations involving chromosome 3, such as t(3;8)(p14;q24.13) and t(2;3)(q35;q21) have been described in familial clear cell RCC. The most recent class of RCC, seen only in men, is referred to as translocation tumors. These tumors demonstrate a tubulopapillary growth pattern and have a t(X;1)(p11.2;q21.2) translocation. Although not required for most clinical diagnoses, CGH and FISH complement the standard histologic diagnosis of RCC and may provide a definitive diagnosis in a small number of challenging cases.     

Oncocytoid renal cell carcinoma after neuroblastoma: a report of four cases of a distinct clinicopathologic entity.

Four children who developed oncocytoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after neuroblastoma are reported. One patient had multiple, bilateral RCCs. The mean age at time of diagnosis of RCC was 8.8 years (range, 5-13 years). The mean interval between neuroblastoma and RCC was 7.15 years (range, 3.1-11.5 years). The histologic findings of these RCCs did not fit within the spectrum of known renal epithelial neoplasms. Most of the neoplastic cells in all cases had eosinophilic, oncocytoid cytoplasm and were arranged in solid and papillary growth patterns. A subset of cells with reticular cytoplasm was also present. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated keratins 8 and 18 in all neoplasms and keratin 20 in two cases. DNA ploidy analysis revealed that two of three neoplasms assessed were aneuploid. Cytogenetic studies revealed 45, XX, add or dup (7)(q32q36) in one neoplasm, and 83-89, XXXX, -1 ,-3, del (3)(q11.1q2?1), der(4)t(4;?22) (q32;q11.2), -14, -22 in a second tumor. Microsatellite polymerase chain reaction analysis detected no abnormalities in one neoplasm and allelic imbalance of chromosomes 2p31-32.2, 8p22, 9p22-24, 13q22, 20q13, and 22q11 in a second tumor. In case 4, two different RCCs excised 6 months apart were analyzed. The initial neoplasm showed allelic imbalance of chromosomes 2q31-32.2, 5q22, 5q31, 10p13-14, 13q22, 14q31, and 20q13. The subsequent neoplasm showed allelic imbalance of chromosomes 3p21.3, 14q31, and 20q13. The common presence of 14q31 and 20q13 abnormalities suggests that these two neoplasms were genetically related. In aggregate, these findings are distinctive, are not found in known types of RCC, and support the morphologic impression that oncocytoid RCC after neuroblastoma is a distinct clinicopathologic entity.     

Analytical validation and interobserver reproducibility of EnzMet GenePro: a second-generation bright-field metallography assay for concomitant detection of HER2 gene status and protein expression in invasive carcinoma of the breast

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has both excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast carcinoma. FISH has not been widely implemented in clinical practice because of reagent costs and the special instrumentation and expertise required to perform and integrate the assay. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2 protein is widely used, but false-positive and false-negative results are problematic. We developed a bright-field assay to visualize HER2 gene amplification and concomitant HER2 protein expression (EnzMet GenePro). This assay detects HER2 gene amplification via deposition of metallic silver by enzyme metallographytrade mark (EnzMettrade mark, Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY) combined with HER2 protein detection by IHC using alkaline phosphatase and fast red K substrate visualization (CB11;Ventana, Tucson, AZ). The assay was performed on 94 invasive breast carcinomas, for which FISH (PathVysiontrade mark, Vysis, Downer's Grove, IL), conventional IHC (CB11), and enzyme metallography (EnzMettrade mark) results were known. The EnzMettrade mark component of the assay was scored as either HER2 gene amplified, polysomic, or nonamplified. The IHC component was scored using the conventional FDA scale of 0 to 3+. Concordance of the EnzMet component of the assay versus FISH was assessed and showed an excellent correlation (Pearson coefficient of 0.95; P < 0.001). The combination of gene and protein detection (EnzMet GenePro) displayed a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 92.6% (95% confidence interval 85.3-97.0), facilitated recognition of gene/protein discordances, and allowed for efficient interpretation of the slide by conventional light microscopy. The interobserver kappa for each component was excellent (IHC, kappa = 0.94; and EnzMettrade mark, kappa = 0.96). EnzMet is the first bright-field ISH assay in our experience that routinely and nonambiguously detects endogenous HER2 signals, essential for a reliable clinical HER2 assay, and in combination with HER2 protein enables improved diagnosis in borderline cases.     

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor protein in human renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, one of the most important angiogenetic factors) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by analysing many RCCs for the expression of immunohistochemical (IHC) VEGF-staining related to clinicopathological findings and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VEGF immunostaining was examined with the tissue microarray (TMA) method on tumour samples from 229 patients and validated in 71 by ordinary tissue sections (TS). IHC VEGF expression was quantified by estimating the volume density and staining intensity on a three-grade scale. RESULTS: In most RCCs there was VEGF staining in the cell cytoplasm and membrane. In cell membranes the VEGF expression declined with storage time. IHC VEGF expression analysed by TMA and TS gave corresponding results. There was no difference in VEGF expression among conventional, papillary and chromophobe RCCs. There were significant correlations between VEGF expression and tumour size and stage. In univariate analysis VEGF expression correlated with survival, especially in conventional RCCs; this prognostic information was lost in multivariate analysis. The VEGF staining intensity correlated only with VEGF expression but not with any clinicopathological factors. CONCLUSIONS: VEGF protein was present in most RCC cells. There was no difference in VEGF expression among the different RCC types. The correlation between VEGF expression and tumour stage and with prognosis indicates the significance of VEGF within tumour growth and progression in RCC.     

Gastrointestinal involvement in mantle cell lymphoma: a prospective clinic, endoscopic, and pathologic study

The frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) at diagnosis is reported to be below 30%. To investigate the actual frequency of GI involvement by MCL, upper and lower endoscopy was prospectively performed on 13 untreated MCL patients at diagnosis. Multiple biopsies from endoscopically normal and abnormal gastric and colonic mucosa were studied with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD20, CD5, and cyclin D1, as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for t(11;14) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for immunoglobulin heavy chain gene. Abnormal mucosa was identified in 38% of cases by upper endoscopy (mainly mild nonspecific gastritis) and in 54% of cases by lower endoscopy (mostly micropolyps). Histologically, infiltration by MCL was demonstrated in the stomach in 77% of cases and in the colon in 77% of cases. As a whole, 92% of patients showed upper or lower GI tract infiltration by MCL. Histologic evidence of MCL involvement was present in all cases with endoscopically abnormal mucosa, but it was also observed in two-thirds of cases with endoscopically unremarkable mucosa. Positive cyclin D1 IHC was seen in all instances displaying CD20 and CD5-positive lymphoid infiltrates, whereas t(11;14) was demonstrated by FISH in 63.5% and PCR was clonal in 64% of those instances. In conclusion, the great majority of MCL patients showed GI tract involvement at the time of diagnosis, not uncommonly in the form of minute lymphoid infiltrates. IHC for cyclin D1 was significantly more sensitive than FISH t(11;14) or PCR for immunoglobulin heavy chain gene to confirm MCL in this setting.     

HER-2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) compared with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in breast cancer-A study of two hundred cases

The purpose of the study was to compare two methods used to analyse HER-2 gene amplification (fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH)), and determine the accuracy of the antibodies CB11 and HercepTest for immunohistochemical detection of HER-2 overexpression from archival breast cancer tissue. Additionally, interobserver variability in the interpretation of CISH and immunohistochemical tests was measured. Two hundred cases of invasive breast carcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2003 were selected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with HercepTest and CB11, and gene amplification was determined by FISH (PathVision, Vysis) and CISH (Zymed) using tissue macroarrays. An excellent concordance (94.8%) was found between CISH and FISH. Considering FISH as gold standard, sensitivity of CISH was 97.5% and specificity 94%. Overall interobserver agreement of CISH was 97.5% and of IHC 84%. Both antibodies showed a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 70.7% (CB11) and 81.2% (HercepTest). Our results show that CISH is a highly accurate, reproducible and practical technique to determine HER-2 gene amplification. CB11 and HercepTest are good screening methods with a high sensitivity. The performance of tissue macroarrays to test HER-2 status by IHC, FISH and CISH has demonstrated to be an available and effective method to study large series of tumours.     

RET protein expression in papillary renal cell carcinoma

ObjectiveTo examine the role of RET in renal malignancy, in particular papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and methodsA cohort of 111 archival renal samples was used consisting of 94 renal cancers (66 papillary RCC, 18 conventional clear cell carcinoma, 10 chromophobe RCC), 4 benign oncocytomas, and 13 normal kidney tissues. RET protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry and expression levels were correlated with clinicopathologic and patient survival data.ResultsPositive RET staining was seen in 34/66 (52%) papillary RCCs, 4/10 (40%) chromophobe carcinomas, 4/4 (100%) oncocytomas, and 11/13 (85%) normal kidney samples. All 18 cases of conventional clear cell carcinoma had negative RET staining. RET expression was associated with low Fuhrman nuclear grade.ConclusionsRET protein may be contributing in part to an adaptation of a papillary growth pattern in certain renal malignancies. Given the possible therapeutic benefit of small molecule inhibitors of RET activation, further work needs to be done to highlight the functional relevance of RET protein expression in papillary RCC.     

Diagnosing primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the use of the monoclonal antibody 'Renal Cell Carcinoma Marker'.

The diagnosis of primary or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be difficult, especially in small biopsies, because of the wide variety of histologic appearances and clinical presentations that RCC can assume. An immunomarker specific for RCC is currently not available. We tested the relevant diagnostic use of the Renal Cell Carcinoma Marker (RCC Ma), a monoclonal antibody, against a normal human proximal tubular brush border antigen. Immunostaining using RCC Ma and the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique was performed on archival tissues from primary and metastatic tumors of renal or nonrenal origin. A total of 122 of 153 primary RCCs (79.7%) were positive [clear cell (84%), papillary (96%), chromophobe (45%), sarcomatoid (25%), and collecting duct (0%)], with > or =10% of tumor cells stained in 93% of cases. None of the 64 primary renal tumors other than RCC, including 15 oncocytomas, was positive. Fifteen of 146 (10.2%) nonrenal primary tumors were positive (5 of 17 breast tumors, 8 of 8 parathyroid adenomas, and 2 of 7 embryonal carcinomas). Forty-two of 63 (67%) metastatic RCCs were positive with > or =10% of cells being stained in 83% of them. Two of 108 (2%) metastases from tumors other than RCCs were positive, both of which were metastatic breast carcinomas; however, only 10% (2 of 19) of metastatic breast carcinomas were positive. RCC Ma is an excellent marker for primary RCC, which should facilitate its diagnosis in a small biopsy. Although RCC Ma remains highly specific (98%) for metastatic RCC, a negative result may not rule out metastatic RCC because of a rather low sensitivity and a focal staining pattern in some of the positive cases. RCC Ma may also facilitate the differential diagnosis between oncocytoma and other types of RCC when they are composed mostly of eosinophilic cells.     

Hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic Rathke cleft cysts mimicking pituitary apoplexy

OBJECTIVES: Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs) are infrequently symptomatic, and apoplexy is one of the most unusual presentations. Only a few cases of apoplexy associated with RCCs have been reported, and their clinical, imaging, surgical, and pathological features are poorly understood. In the cases that have been reported, intracystic hemorrhage has been a consistent finding. The authors report 6 cases of RCCs in which the presenting clinical and imaging features indicated pituitary apoplexy, both with and without intracystic hemorrhage. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed charts and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies obtained in patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for RCC. Six patients were identified who presented with symptoms and MR imaging characteristics consistent with pituitary apoplexy but were found intraoperatively to have an RCC. All 6 patients presented with a sudden headache, 2 with visual loss, and 1 with diplopia. Review of the preoperative MR images demonstrated mixed signal intensities in the sellar masses suggestive of a hemorrhagic pituitary tumor. In all patients there was a presumed clinical diagnosis of pituitary tumor apoplexy and an imaging-documented diagnosis of hemorrhagic pituitary tumor. RESULTS: All 6 patients underwent transsphenoidal resection to treat the suspected pituitary apoplexy. Intraoperative and histopathological findings were consistent with the diagnosis of an RCC in all cases. Only 2 cases showed evidence of hemorrhage intraoperatively. In all cases, an intracystic nodule was found within the RCC at surgery, and this intracystic nodule was present on the initial MR imaging when retrospectively reviewed. The imaging characteristics of the intracystic nodules were similar to those of acute hemorrhage seen in cases of pituitary apoplexy. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and imaging features of RCCs appear similar to those of hemorrhagic pituitary tumors, making them often indistinguishable from pituitary apoplexy.     

舒尼替尼治疗转移性非透明细胞肾癌的疗效观察

目的 初步探讨舒尼替尼治疗转移性非透明细胞肾癌的疗效.方法 非透明细胞肾癌22例.男14例,女8例.年龄29～76岁,中位年龄46岁.根治性肾切除术后出现转移14例,初诊时诊断为肾癌伴转移行减瘤性肾切除术8例.病理证实乳头状癌12例,嫌色细胞癌1例,集合管癌3例,未分类癌6例.转移部位包括肺、淋巴结、肾上腺,骨和肝脏.舒尼替尼50mg/d,口服,每天1次,治疗4周休息2周.治疗时间4.5 ～24.0个月,中位时间11个月.随访4.5 ～25.0个月,中位时间14个月.结果 22例疾病控制率为73％ (16/22).部分缓解4例(18％),其中乳头状癌3例,嫌色细胞癌1例,转移灶位于肺或肺加腹膜后淋巴结,或腹膜后淋巴结.疾病稳定＞3个月12例(55％),用药3个疗程内疾病进展6例(27％).结论 舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾乳头状癌、嫌色细胞癌、集合管癌、未分类癌有效,对淋巴结转移及肺转移者的疗效相对较好.     

Histopathologic characteristics predicting HER-2/neu amplification in breast cancer

The HER-2/neu gene is a proto-oncogene that is amplified in 10-30% of breast cancers. New drugs for targeted therapy, such as Herceptin, are effective for patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumors, making it necessary to have a noncostly and accurate method to assess HER-2/neu status. We studied the correlation of findings made by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and the possibility of combining IHC and other clinicopathologic characteristics of breast tumors to predict FISH-determined HER-2/neu status. The clinicopathologic characteristics analyzed were the size of the tumor, p53, lymph-vascular invasion, estrogen/progesterone receptors (ER/PR), tumor grade, axillary lymph node status, and patient age. A total of 199 cases of invasive breast cancer studied at the UCLA Pathology Laboratory during 2003 were included in this study. Tumors with IHC 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+ scores were found to be FISH positive in 3.5%, 6.4%, 25.7%, and 81.5% of the respective groups. Our study showed a strong association between the FISH-negative and IHC scored 0 and 1+ tumors, suggesting that the FISH test may not be necessary in these cases (p<0.0001). Although the concordance between IHC 3+ and FISH positive is high, 18% of the patients with overexpression of HER-2/neu fail to show gene amplification by FISH. HER-2/neu positivity was found to be proportionally associated with increasing grade in infiltrating ductal carcinoma (p<0.0001). p53-positive tumors are more likely to be HER-2/neu amplified (p=0.0003). Tumors that are negative for ER/PR are also associated with HER-2/neu positivity by FISH (31.15%, p=0.0016). FISH-determined HER-2/neu status is not associated with histologic type, tumor size, nodal status, lymph-vascular invasion, or patient age.