Possible modifier genes in the variation of neurofibromatosis type 1 clinical phenotypes

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is the most common neurogenetic disorder worldwide, caused by mutations in the (NF1) gene. Although NF1 is a single-gene disorder with autosomal-dominant inheritance, its clinical expression is highly variable and unpredictable. NF1 patients have the highest known mutation rate among all human disorders, with no clear genotype–phenotype correlations. Therefore, variations in NF1 mutations may not correlate with the variations in clinical phenotype. Indeed, for the same mutation, some NF1 patients may develop severe clinical symptoms whereas others will develop a mild phenotype. Variations in the mutant NF1 allele itself cannot account for all of the disease variability, indicating a contribution of modifier genes, environmental factors, or their combination. Considering the gene structure and the interaction of neurofibromin protein with cellular components, there are many possible candidate modifier genes. This review aims to provide an overview of the potential modifier genes contributing to NF1 clinical variability.     

Clinical presentations of 23 half‐siblings from a mosaic neurofibromatosis type 1 sperm donor

The Danish sperm donor number 7042 has fathered several offspring with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) worldwide. NF1 is caused by loss‐of‐function mutations in the NF1 gene and more than 1000 NF1 mutations are identified. Analysis of the donor sperm demonstrated gonosomal mosaicism with an intragenic deletion involving exons 15–29 in the NF1 gene. At the two Danish reference centres for NF1 patients, we evaluated 23 half‐siblings from the donor. Nine were diagnosed with NF1. The severity grade of NF1 progressed from minimal to mild/moderate within 3 years of follow‐up. The NF1 phenotype shows great variability in intra‐ and inter‐family expressivity and to date only two NF1 genotype–phenotype correlations have been established. This rare possibility of a long‐term follow‐up of a cohort of half‐siblings with NF1 makes further studies including phenotypic variability and search for modifier genes possible. To achieve this goal, we have initiated The International Donor 7042 NF1 Offspring Registry. Research facilitated via this registry may reveal important new knowledge of clinical characteristics and prognostics for the specific NF1 genotype and thereby contribute to future individualised targeted clinical follow‐up and treatment.     

Café-au-lait macules and intertriginous freckling in piebaldism: clinical overlap with neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome

Piebaldism is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by congenital hypopigmented patches of skin and hair and has been found to be associated with mutations in the KIT or SLUG genes. Café-au-lait macules (CALM) may occasionally be seen in piebaldism. There are four reports describing six patients who were said to have both piebaldism and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) due to the presence of multiple CALM and intertriginous freckling, but none of these patients had undergone comprehensive NF1 mutation analysis. We describe a large family with piebaldism in which two members meet diagnostic criteria for NF1 based on the presence of >5 CALM and intertriginous freckling. Interestingly, only these two family members are of mixed race, which could be of importance. A novel complex mutation in the KIT gene was identified in several family members affected with piebaldism; the proband meeting diagnostic criteria for NF1 also underwent comprehensive NF1 and SPRED1 testing with no mutations detected. These findings suggest that piebaldism may occasionally include CALM and intertriginous freckling, which may create diagnostic confusion especially in the absence of a family history of piebaldism. However, careful clinical evaluation and molecular testing if necessary should distinguish these two disorders.     

A patient severely affected by spinal neurofibromas carries a recurrent splice site mutation in the NF1 gene

Spinal neurofibromas are found in up to 38% of NF1 patients. However, they cause clinical implications only in about 5% of the patients. In contrast, multiple symptomatic spinal neurofibromas are the main clinical finding in patients with familial spinal neurofibromatosis. Familial spinal neurofibromatosis has been considered to be a distinct clinical form of neurofibromatosis. Linkage analysis in two families and identification of a NF1 gene mutation in a third family strongly associate spinal neurofibromatosis with the NF1 gene. We describe a NF1 patient who satisfies the NIH diagnostic criteria and has severe spinal involvement with bilateral spinal root neurofibromas at every level. A recurrent splice site mutation (IVS19b-3C>G) was identified in the NF1 gene in the patient. We discuss the possibility that the clinical picture of this patient represents an additional example of spinal neurofibromatosis. By comparison of the clinical expression of NF1 in this patient and that in another patient with the identical mutation the hypothesis that spinal neurofibromatosis is associated with a particular mutation is highly unlikely. The involvement of other genes linked to the NF1 gene or modifying genes is currently the most likely explanation for the clinical phenotype of spinal neurofibromatosis.     

Evidence of a four-hit mechanism involving SMARCB1 and NF2 in schwannomatosis-associated schwannomas

Schwannomatosis is characterized by the onset of multiple intracranial, spinal, or peripheral schwannomas, without involvement of the vestibular nerve, which is instead pathognomonic of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Recently, a schwannomatosis family with a germline mutation of the SMARCB1 gene on chromosome 22 has been described. We report on the molecular analysis of the SMARCB1 and NF2 genes in a series of 21 patients with schwannomatosis and in eight schwannomatosis-associated tumors from four different patients. A novel germline SMARCB1 mutation was found in one patient; inactivating somatic mutations of NF2, associated with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 22q, were found in two schwannomas of this patient. This is the second report of a germline SMARCB1 mutation in patients affected by schwannomatosis and the first report of SMARCB1 mutations associated with somatic NF2 mutations in schwannomatosis-associated tumors. The latter observation suggests that a four-hit mechanism involving the SMARCB1 and NF2 genes may be implicated in schwannomatosis-related tumorigenesis.     

Genomic organization and mutation screening of the human ortholog of Pkdr1 associated with polycystic kidney disease in the rat

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is one of the most common inherited disorders in humans. Although disease-causing mutations have been found in two genes, PKD1 and PKD2, a small number of ADPKD families exist that are unlinked to either of these genes, suggesting involvement of a third, as yet unidentified PKD3 gene. Susceptibility to renal cyst formation in the (cy/+) rat is caused by a missense mutation in Pkdr1 encoding the novel protein SamCystin. To initiate studies of the human orthologous gene, we determined the location and the organization of human PKDR1. We genotyped microsatellite markers flanking the human ortholog in PKD families that either are unlinked to known PKD genes, or in which mutations have not yet been identified and carried out mutation analysis in PKD patients. We identified eight novel single nucleotide polymorphisms, including three leading to amino acid changes. These variants are unlikely to account for PKD in these patients, yet the screening of other affected populations may provide information about the involvement of PKDR1 as a modifier gene in cystic kidney disease.     

A clinical and genetic overview of 18 years neurofibromatosis type 1 molecular diagnostics in the Netherlands

NF1 mutations are the underlying cause of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a neuro‐cardio‐facio‐cutaneous syndrome (NCFC). Because of the clinical overlap between NCFCs, genetic analysis of NF1 is necessary to confirm a clinical diagnosis NF1. This report describes the clinical and genetic findings of 18 years of NF1 molecular diagnostics in the Netherlands. A pathogenic mutation was found in 59.3% (1178/1985) of the index patients, mostly de novo (73.8%). The majority of the index patients (64.3%) fulfilled the National Institute of Health NF1 criteria, a pathogenic mutation was found in 80.9% of these patients. Seventy‐four percent of the index patients with an NF1 pathogenic mutation and not fulfilling the NF1 criteria is <12 years, in agreement with the fact that some NF1 symptoms appear after puberty. Genotype–phenotype correlations were studied for 527 index patients. NF1 patients with a type 1 microdeletion have a sixfold higher risk of special education vs NF1 patients with an intragenic mutation. No evidently milder NF1 phenotype for patients with a missense mutation was observed. Forty‐six prenatal analyses were performed in 28 (2.4%) families, of which 29 (63%) showed heterozygosity for the familial pathogenic mutation. This indicates that there is a need for prenatal NF1 testing.     

Molecular study of 33 families with Fraser syndrome new data and mutation review

Fraser syndrome (FS) is an autosomal recessive malformation disorder characterized by cryptophthalmos, syndactyly, and abnormalities of the respiratory and urogenital tract. FS is considered to be the human equivalent of the murine blebbing mutants: in the mouse mutations at five loci cause a phenotype that is comparable to FS in humans, and thus far mutations in two syntenic human genes, FRAS1 and FREM2, have been identified to cause FS. Here we present the molecular analysis of 48 FS patients from 18 consanguineous and 15 nonconsanguineous families. Linkage analysis in consanguineous families indicated possible linkage to FRAS1 and FREM2 in 60% of the cases. Mutation analysis identified 11 new mutations in FRAS1 and one FREM2 mutation. Manifestations of these patients and previously reported cases with an FRAS1 mutation were compared to cases without detectable FRAS1 mutations to study genotype-phenotype correlations. Although our data suggest that patients with an FRAS1 mutation have more frequently skull ossification defects and low insertion of the umbilical cord, these differences are not statistically significant. Mutations were identified in only 43% of the cases suggesting that other genes syntenic to murine genes causing blebbing may be responsible for FS as well.     

Analysis of CpG C-to-T mutations in neurofibromatosis type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a dominant disorder caused by mutations in the NF1 gene; approximately 100 NF1 gene mutations have been published. The CpG C-to-T transition is a frequent mutation mechanism in genetic disorders. To estimate its frequency in NF1, we employed a PCR-restriction digestion method to examine 17 CpGs in 65 patients, and also screened for a CpG nonsense transition (R1947X) that occurs in 1-2% of patients. The analysis revealed disease-related CpG C-to-T transitions (including a nonsense mutation that may be as frequent as R1947X) as well as a benign variant and another mutation at a CpG. Four patients showed CpG mutations in analysis of 18 sites (17 surveyed by restriction digest, plus the R1947X assay), including three C-to-T transitions and one C-to-G transversion. These 18 sites represent one-fifth of the 91 CpGs at which a C-to-T transition would result in a nonsense or nonconservative missense mutation. Thus, it is feasible that the CpG mutation rate at NF1 might be similar to that seen in other disorders with a high mutation rate, and that recurrent NF1 mutations may frequently reside at CpG sites. Hum Mutat 11:411, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Exploring the somatic NF1 mutational spectrum associated with NF1 cutaneous neurofibromas

Neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1), caused by heterozygous inactivation of the NF1 tumour suppressor gene, is associated with the development of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs). Although numerous germline NF1 mutations have been identified, relatively few somatic NF1 mutations have been described in neurofibromas. Here we have screened 109 cutaneous neurofibromas, excised from 46 unrelated NF1 patients, for somatic NF1 mutations. NF1 mutation screening (involving loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) analysis, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and DNA sequencing) identified 77 somatic NF1 point mutations, of which 53 were novel. LOH spanning the NF1 gene region was evident in 25 neurofibromas, but in contrast to previous data from MPNSTs, it was absent at the TP53, CDKN2A and RB1 gene loci. Analysis of DNA/RNA from neurofibroma-derived Schwann cell cultures revealed NF1 mutations in four tumours whose presence had been overlooked in the tumour DNA. Bioinformatics analysis suggested that four of seven novel somatic NF1 missense mutations (p.A330T, p.Q519P, p.A776T, p.S1463F) could be of functional/clinical significance. Functional analysis confirmed this prediction for p.S1463F, located within the GTPase-activating protein-related domain, as this mutation resulted in a 150-fold increase in activated GTP-bound Ras. Comparison of the relative frequencies of the different types of somatic NF1 mutation observed with those of their previously reported germline counterparts revealed significant (P=0.001) differences. Although non-identical somatic mutations involving either the same or adjacent nucleotides were identified in three pairs of tumours from the same patients (P<0.0002), no association was noted between the type of germline and somatic NF1 lesion within the same individual.     

The location of constitutional neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) splice site mutations is associated with the severity of NF2

Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) patients with constitutional splice site NF2 mutations have greater variability in disease severity than NF2 patients with other types of mutations; the cause of this variability is unknown. We evaluated genotype-phenotype correlations, with particular focus on the location of splice site mutations, using mutation and clinical information on 831 patients from 528 NF2 families with identified constitutional NF2 mutations. The clinical characteristics examined were age at onset of symptoms of NF2 and number of intracranial meningiomas, which are the primary indices of the severity of NF2. Two regression models were used to analyse genotype-phenotype correlations. People with splice site mutations in exons 1–5 had more severe disease than those with splice site mutations in exons 11–15. This result is compatible with studies showing that exons 2 and 3 are required for self-association of the amino terminal of the NF2 protein in vitro, and that deletions of exons 2 and 3 in transgenic and knockout mouse models of NF2 cause a high prevalence of Schwann cell derived tumours.     

NF1 Molecular Characterization and Neurofibromatosis Type I Genotype–Phenotype Correlation: The French Experience

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affects about one in 3,500 people in all ethnic groups. Most NF1 patients have private loss‐of‐function mutations scattered along the NF1 gene. Here, we present an original NF1 investigation strategy and report a comprehensive mutation analysis of 565 unrelated patients from the NF‐France Network. A NF1 mutation was identified in 546 of the 565 patients, giving a mutation detection rate of 97%. The combined cDNA/DNA approach showed that a significant proportion of NF1 missense mutations (30%) were deleterious by affecting pre‐mRNA splicing. Multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification allowed the identification of restricted rearrangements that would have been missed if only sequencing or microsatellite analysis had been performed. In four unrelated families, we identified two distinct NF1 mutations within the same family. This fortuitous association points out the need to perform an exhaustive NF1 screening in the case of molecular discordant‐related patients. A genotype–phenotype study was performed in patients harboring a truncating (N = 368), in‐frame splicing (N = 36), or missense (N = 35) mutation. The association analysis of these mutation types with 12 common NF1 clinical features confirmed a weak contribution of the allelic heterogeneity of the NF1 mutation to the NF1 variable expressivity.     

BOC is a modifier gene in holoprosencephaly

Holoprosencephaly (HPE), a common developmental defect of the forebrain and midface, has a complex etiology. Heterozygous, loss‐of‐function mutations in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway are associated with HPE. However, mutation carriers display highly variable clinical presentation, leading to an “autosomal dominant with modifier” model, in which the penetrance and expressivity of a predisposing mutation is graded by genetic or environmental modifiers. Such modifiers have not been identified. Boc encodes a SHH coreceptor and is a silent HPE modifier gene in mice. Here, we report the identification of missense BOC variants in HPE patients. Consistent with these alleles functioning as HPE modifiers, individual variant BOC proteins had either loss‐ or gain‐of‐function properties in cell‐based SHH signaling assays. Therefore, in addition to heterozygous loss‐of‐function mutations in specific SHH pathway genes and an ill‐defined environmental component, our findings identify a third variable in HPE: low‐frequency modifier genes, BOC being the first identified.     

A variable combination of features of Noonan syndrome and neurofibromatosis type I are caused by mutations in the NF1 gene

Signs of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and Noonan syndrome (NS), two distinct autosomal dominant disorders, occur together in patients reported as Watson syndrome (WS), neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome (NFNS), partial LEOPARD syndrome, NS with features of NF1, and NF1 with Noonan-like features. The molecular basis of these combined phenotypes was poorly understood and controversially discussed over several decades. Only recently, there is increasing evidence for WS and NFNS being allelic to NF1 in the majority of patients. In this study we describe seven novel patients from five unrelated families with variable phenotypes of the NF1-NS spectrum which were systematically analyzed for mutations in the disease-causing genes NF1 for NF1 and PTPN11 for NS. Heterozygous mutations or deletions of NF1 were identified in all patients, while no PTPN11 mutation was found. The NF1 mutation segregated with the phenotype in both familial cases. These results support the hypothesis that variable phenotypes of the NF1-NS spectrum represent variants of NF1 in the majority of cases. Constitutive deregulation of the Ras pathway either through activating mutations of PTPN11 or through haploinsufficiency of neurofibromin, which acts as a Ras-inactivating GTP-ase, is probably the common pathogenetic mechanism explaining the phenotypic overlap of NS and NF1.     

Somatic loss of wild type NF1 allele in neurofibromas: Comparison of NF1 microdeletion and non-microdeletion patients

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is an autosomal dominant familial tumor syndrome characterized by the presence of multiple benign neurofibromas. In 95% of NF1 individuals, a mutation is found in the NF1 gene, and in 5% of the patients, the germline mutation consists of a microdeletion that includes the NF1 gene and several flanking genes. We studied the frequency of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the NF1 region as a mechanism of somatic NF1 inactivation in neurofibromas from NF1 patients with and without a microdeletion. There was a statistically significant difference between these two patient groups in the proportion of neurofibromas with LOH. None of the 40 neurofibromas from six different NF1 microdeletion patients showed LOH, whereas LOH was observed in 6/28 neurofibromas from five patients with an intragenic NF1 mutation (P = 0.0034, Fisher's exact). LOH of the NF1 microdeletion region in NF1 microdeletion patients would de facto lead to a nullizygous state of the genes located in the deletion region and might be lethal. The mechanisms leading to LOH were further analyzed in six neurofibromas. In two out of six neurofibromas, a chromosomal microdeletion was found; in three, a mitotic recombination was responsible for the observed LOH; and in one, a chromosome loss with reduplication was present. These data show an important difference in the mechanisms of second hit formation in the 2 NF1 patient groups. We conclude that NF1 is a familial tumor syndrome in which the type of germline mutation influences the type of second hit in the tumors.     

Breast cancer risk and germline genomic profiling of women with neurofibromatosis type 1 who developed breast cancer

NF1 mutations predispose to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and women with NF1 have a moderately elevated risk for breast cancer, especially under age 50. Germline genomic analysis may better define the risk so screening and prevention can be applied to the individuals who benefit the most. Survey conducted in several neurofibromatosis clinics in the United States has demonstrated a 17.2% lifetime risk of breast cancer in women affected with NF1. Cumulated risk to age 50 is estimated to be 9.27%. For genomic profiling, fourteen women with NF1 and a history of breast cancer were recruited and underwent whole exome sequencing (WES), targeted genomic DNA based and RNA‐based analysis of the NF1 gene. Deleterious NF1 pathogenic variants were identified in each woman. Frameshift mutations because of deletion/duplication/complex rearrangement were found in 50% (7/14) of the cases, nonsense mutations in 21% (3/14), in‐frame splice mutations in 21% (3/14), and one case of missense mutation (7%, 1/14). No deleterious mutation was found in the following high/moderate‐penetrance breast cancer genes: ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BARD1, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, FANCC, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, TP53, and STK11. Twenty‐five rare or common variants in cancer related genes were discovered and may have contributed to the breast cancers in these individuals. Breast cancer predisposition modifiers in women with NF1 may involve a great variety of molecular and cellular functions.