Comparison of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin Preservation in Renal Transplantation

Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) is replacing University of Wisconsin (UW) solution as the preservation fluid for renal allografts in many centers, but recent large-scale data to support this transition are lacking. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient and graft outcomes after renal transplantation at our center, comparing 475 consecutive living donor and 317 deceased donor transplants since the adoption of HTK with equal numbers of grafts preserved using UW solution. Data collected included donor and recipient age, race, sex, comorbidities and graft ischemia time. Graft and patient survival, as well as the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), were studied by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis. No significant difference was seen in either patient or graft survival. Deceased donor kidneys in the HTK group had a higher incidence of DGF than the UW cohort, whereas this trend was reversed in the case of living donor organs. In multivariate analysis, HTK was associated with a significant risk reduction on the incidence of DGF. Prolonged preservation with HTK compared to UW was not associated with excess risk to the graft or patient. In summary, HTK demonstrated efficacy similar to UW in terms of patient and graft survival.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin solutions as primary preservation in renal allografts undergoing pulsatile perfusion

INTRODUCTION: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is the standard preservation solution for organ transplantation. Histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution has been used increasingly for kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation. This study compared HTK and UW used during kidney procurement with subsequent pulsatile perfusion. METHODS: Between January and October 2003, 91 deceased renal and simultaneous kidney pancreas transplants were performed (UW, n = 41, and HTK, n = 50). There were no differences with regard to donor and recipient demographics or cold ischemia. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 3 (7%) of UW and 4 (8%) of HTK-preserved kidneys (P = NS). There were no significant differences between patient or graft survival. There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.1 +/- 1.0 vs UW: 3.0 +/- 0.5; P < .005). CONCLUSION: UW and HTK appear to have similar efficacy in kidney preservation with pulsatile perfusion. HTK preservation solution can be used safely in conjunction with pulsatile preservation for cold storage of renal allografts.     

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants

Single-center studies have reported equivalent outcomes of kidney allografts recovered with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) or University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. However, these studies were likely underpowered and often unadjusted, and multicenter studies have suggested HTK preservation might increase delayed graft function (DGF) and reduce graft survival of renal allografts. To further inform clinical practice, we analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database of deceased donor kidney transplants performed from July 2004 to February 2008 to determine if HTK (n = 5728) versus UW (n = 15 898) preservation impacted DGF or death-censored graft survival. On adjusted analyses, HTK preservation had no effect on DGF (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, p = 0.7) but was associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, p = 0.008). The detrimental effect of HTK was a relatively late one, with a strong association between HTK and subsequent graft loss in those surviving beyond 12 months (HR 1.43, p = 0.007). Interestingly, a much stronger effect was seen in African-American recipients (HR 1.55, p = 0.024) than in Caucasian recipients (HR 1.18, p = 0.5). Given recent studies that also demonstrate that HTK preservation reduces liver and pancreas allograft survival, we suggest that the use of HTK for abdominal organ recovery should be reconsidered.     

Preservation solutions for static cold storage of kidney allografts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Static cold storage is the most prevalent method for renal allograft preservation. Several solutions have been designed to counteract the detrimental effects of cold ischemia and reperfusion. The aim of this study was to appraise the evidence for the currently available preservation solutions. We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Transplant Library and trial registries. Inclusion criteria specified any comparative, prospective study for deceased donor renal allografts. Studies were assessed for methodological quality. The primary outcome was delayed graft function (DGF). Fifteen trials with a total of 3584 kidneys were included. Eurocollins was associated with a higher risk of DGF than University of Wisconsin solution (UW) in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) in two RCTs. UW was associated with an equal risk of DGF compared with Celsior in three RCTs and HTK in two RCTs. There was limited data regarding other comparisons and outcomes. The choice of preservation solution has an effect on the incidence of DGF, which might, in turn, affect long-term outcomes. Both UW and HTK have lower rates of DGF than Eurocollins. There is no difference in the incidence of DGF with the use of Celsior, HTK and UW. These findings are supported by registry data.     

The effect of IGL-1 preservation solution on outcome after kidney transplantation: A retrospective single-center analysis

Institut Georges Lopez-1 (IGL-1) solution is increasingly used for kidney preservation, although little information on outcomes is available. Outcomes of all deceased donor kidneys preserved by IGL-1, University of Wisconsin solution (UW), or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and transplanted in our center (2000-2018) were analyzed. Multivariable analysis for delayed graft function (DGF), functional DGF, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, CKD-EPI equation), proteinuria, acute rejection, death-censored graft loss, and patient survival were performed. A double robust approach, consisting of propensity score weighting and correction for confounders, minimized the risk of bias. In total, 1943 transplants were included: 234 with IGL-1, 1046 with UW, and 663 with HTK. As IGL-1 was only introduced in 2014, a prespecified sensitivity analysis of 917 kidneys (2010-2018) was performed using the same statistical approach. After weighting, IGL-1 retained a higher proportion of kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD). IGL-1 was not independently associated with any of the outcomes when compared to UW or HTK. Sensitivity analysis between 2010 and 2018 showed similar results. In this retrospective analysis, using robust methodology to reduce the risk of bias, IGL-1 preservation results in equal outcomes compared to UW or HTK, despite more DCD transplants in the IGL-1 group.     

Initial experience using histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: The colloid-based University of Wisconsin (UW) preservation solution has been used extensively in clinical pancreas transplantation. Experimental studies support the use of the crystalloid-based histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solution for this purpose. AIM: We report our initial experience with HTK for pancreas allograft preservation and compare this to a contemporary experience with UW solution in conventional multiorgan deceased donors (<50 yr). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively collected information on 33 pancreas transplants between September 2001 and October 2002 were analyzed for early graft function and complications up to 30 d after procurement and storage in either HTK or UW solutions. During multi-organ recovery, either UW solution (4-5 L) or HTK solution (8-10 L) was used for aortic perfusion and subsequent back-table flush and storage. Exocrine drainage of 31 pancreas allografts was enteric, while the bladder was used for drainage in two cases. Patient outcomes were analyzed according to the preservation solution used. Sixteen pancreata were used in combination with a kidney allograft (SPK), seven were used in patients after prior kidney transplantation (PAK), while 10 were used in patients who were not in renal failure (PTA). RESULTS: The UW group consisted of 17 patients (10 SPK, three PAK, four PTA) with a mean donor age of 29.5 +/- 10.7, and a mean cold ischemia time of 15.1 +/- 2.1 h. The mean post-transplant pancreas and kidney function on days 1 and 10 were amylase (315 and 99 IU/L), lipase (1727 and 346 IU/L), glucose (121 and 100 mg/dL) and creatinine (5.01 and 1.77 mg/dL). Patient and graft survival was 100% at 1-month post transplant. In the HTK group there were 16 patients (six SPK, four PAK, six PTA) with a mean donor age 21.9 +/- 5.7 and a mean cold ischemia time 14.0 +/- 1.3 h. The mean post-transplant pancreas and kidney function on days 1 and 10 were amylase (588 and 126 IU/L), lipase (4711 and 441 IU/L), glucose (97 and 109 mg/dL) and creatinine (5.28 and 2.42 mg/dL). Patient survival was 100% while graft survival was 94% at 1-month post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Early graft function and complications are comparable with HTK and UW solutions for pancreas allograft preservation.     

Follow-up experience using histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

In May 2003, at Indiana University, the standard cold preservation solution University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced by histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution. Earlier, we presented our initial experience with HTK in pancreas preservation with an analysis of the first 10 pancreas transplants. Here we report updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation over the past 18 months. Between May 2003 and March 2005, a total of 87 pancreas transplants were performed with 78 of these organs utilizing HTK. Seventy five patients received 78 organ transplants. Surgical procedures performed were: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 50, 64%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 19, 24%), solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 9, 12%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction and 30-day graft and patient survivals, and compared to the UW cohort from our original report. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Mean follow-up time is 12 +/- 6 months. The mean cold ischemia time was 9 +/- 3 hours. There were no cases of primary graft nonfunction. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survivals were 99% and 93%. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals were 96% and 93%. There were five grafts lost, including three within the first month (two venous and one arterial thrombosis). There was one case of chronic rejection and one noncompliance. All other patients were insulin-independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. Within this range of cold ischemia time, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

Low viscosity histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate graft flush improves subsequent extended cold storage in University of Wisconsin solution in an extracorporeal rat liver perfusion and rat liver transplantation model.

Adequate flushing for liver donation requires large fluid volumes delivered at a high flow. This can be achieved more effectively with crystalloid solutions than with colloid-based solutions. This study examined the combination of initial histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK) graft flush and subsequent storage in University of Wisconsin solution (UW) to that of the single use of each solution. Livers from inbred Wistar rats were procured using aortic perfusion with UW or HTK for initial perfusion and reflushed after 30 minutes using either solution. In a third group, after perfusion with HTK, organs were reflushed with UW. A 60-minute in-vitro recirculating perfusion was performed after 24 hours of cold storage in the subsequent solution, as well as allotransplantation after 18 and 24 hours of cold storage. In extracorporeal perfusion, the HTK flush followed by UW storage was superior compared to the single use of either UW or HTK solution, as measured by portal venous pressure, bile flow, liver enzymes released into the effluent perfusate, glycerol leakage, and histological examinations. These data were consistent with the transplantation study. Histological damage and enzyme release after 5-day survival were lowest in the HTK flush and subsequent UW storage groups following 18 hours of cold storage; likewise, the 5-day survival was superior following 24 hours of cold storage. In conclusion, the combined use of HTK solution for initial graft rinse and subsequent storage in UW solution resulted in a cumulative protection. Choosing low-viscosity HTK solution for the initial organ flush may represent a feasible improvement in liver preservation, which also further reduces the required amount of UW solution.     

UW solution for hypothermic machine perfusion of warm ischemic kidneys

BACKGROUND: Donation of kidneys from non-heart beating donors (NHBD) is increasingly being used to expand the donor pool. Warm ischemic injury of these kidneys suffered at harvest results in DGF at transplantation. In this study, we used hypothermic continuous machine perfusion preservation to mitigate this injury using two available solutions. METHODS: Dog kidneys (beagles) were exposed to 0, 60, or 75 min of in situ warm ischemia (37 degrees C), followed by 24 to 72 hr preservation by machine perfusion with Belzer MPS solution or the UW-solution (Viaspan). Auto-transplantation was performed with immediate contralateral nephrectomy. Survival and renal function (serum creatinine) were evaluated for up to 10 days posttransplant. RESULTS: Both solutions were equally effective for 72 hr machine perfusion preservation of dog kidneys giving 100% survival with only minor renal injury. Both solutions were also equally effective for preservation of kidneys exposed to 60 min of warm ischemia. However, only the UW solution gave reliable preservation (86% survival vs. 25% survival) in kidneys exposed to 75 min of warm ischemia and 24 hr machine perfusion. CONCLUSION: UW solution used with continuous hypothermic machine perfusion preservation can rescue canine kidneys from severe warm ischemic injury.     

A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing histidine–tryptophane–ketoglutarate versus University of Wisconsin perfusion solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

We aimed to evaluate early pancreas transplant graft function after histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) perfusion. Prospective randomized multicenter study including 68 pancreas transplantations stratified according to preservation fluid used (27 HTK vs. 41 UW). Primary endpoint was pancreas graft survival at 6 months. Serum α-amylase, lipase, C-peptide, HbA1C and exogenous insulin requirement were compared at several time points. Mean pancreas cold ischemia time was 10.8 ± 3.7 (HTK) vs. 11.8 ± 3.4 h (UW) ( P  = 0.247). Simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation was performed in 95.6% of the patients, pancreas transplantation alone in 2.9%, and pancreas after kidney transplantation in 1.5%. Six months graft survival was 85.2% (HTK) vs. 90.2% (UW) ( P  = 0.703). Serum amylase and lipase values did not differ between both the groups during the observation period. C-peptide levels were elevated in both the groups without significant differences at each time point. Higher exogenous insulin requirement early after transplantation in the UW group had resolved at 3 months. Six month patient survival was 96.3% (HTK) vs. 100% (UW) ( P  = 0.397). With a mean cold ischemia time of 10 h in this study, HTK and UW solutions appear to be equally suitable for perfusion and organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution for organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is currently the standard preservation solution used for abdominal organ transplantation. This study assesses the efficacy of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) compared with UW in pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Between October 2002 and August 2003, 20 pancreas transplants were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: UW (n=10) and HTK (n=10). Donor and recipient demographics were similar in both groups. The mean cold ischemia time for both groups was 11 +/-3 hr. RESULTS: There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.5 +/- 1.2 L vs. UW: 3.4 +/-0.8 L; P =0.03). Patient and graft survivals to date were 100% in both groups. Serum fasting blood glucose, peak amylase, and serial amylase levels remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Within this range of cold ischemia time, UW and HTK demonstrate similar efficacy in pancreas preservation.     

Evaluation of rat liver apoptotic and necrotic cell death after cold storage using UW,HTK, and Celsior

BACKGROUND: The benefit of Celsior in liver graft preservation is controversial. In the isolated perfused rat liver model, we compared the effects of Celsior, University of Wisconsin (UW), and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solutions on liver cell death. METHODS: Rat livers were stored at 4 degrees C for 0, 8, 16, or 24 hr in either Celsior, UW, or HTK and reperfused for 90 min (37 degrees C). Bile secretion and perfusate levels of liver enzymes and histone-associated DNA fragments were measured. Apoptosis and oncotic necrosis were analyzed in biopsies by DNA gel electrophoresis, hematoxylin and eosin histology, and enzyme histochemistry for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and 5'-nucleotidase (5'-NT). RESULTS: Perfusate flow rate through the liver during perfusion did not significantly differ among preservation solutions. Bile secretion was best preserved in UW livers after 16-hr (versus HTK livers) and 24-hr storage (versus HTK and Celsior livers). Enzyme leakage from UW livers was lower compared with HTK livers after 8-hr storage (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT], LDH) and with Celsior and HTK livers after 16-hr (SGOT, LDH) and 24-hr storage (SGOT, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, LDH, purine nucleoside phosphorylase). In situ LDH and 5'-NT activities were best preserved in UW livers (up to 24 hr), whereas enzyme activities declined remarkably in HTK livers (after 8 hr) and Celsior livers (after 16 hr of cold storage). Although perfusate DNA fragment levels were repeatedly lowest from Celsior livers, apoptotic DNA laddering and the number of fragmented nuclei in hematoxylin and eosin sections was not different among livers after 8, 16, or 24 hr of storage. CONCLUSIONS: Celsior and UW are equally effective in preventing rat liver cell death after 0-16 hr of cold preservation as compared with the less effective HTK solution. After 24-hr cold storage, rat livers were best preserved in UW. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in mode of cell death (apoptosis or oncotic necrosis) after storage in any of the three solutions.     

Organ preservation with histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate solution in clinical pancreas transplantation: an update of the indiana university experience

In May 2003, University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was replaced with Histidine-Tryptophan Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution as the preservation fluid for abdominal organ procurements in our center. Herein we have reported our updated results with HTK in pancreas transplantation. Between May 2003 and October 2006, 152 pancreas transplantations were performed in which 146 used HTK. The procedures were as follows: simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (n = 85; 55%), pancreas after kidney transplantation (n = 41; 30%), and solitary pancreas transplantation (n = 20; 15%). Donor and recipient data were collected with primary outcomes as primary nonfunction (PNF), and 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival. Patient demographics are as follows: age (36 +/- 12 years), gender (males, 89: females, 57), race (white, 135; African American, 11). Mean flush volume was 3.8 +/- 1 L. The mean cold ischemia time was 8 +/- 3 hours. Mean warm ischemia time was 48 +/- 23 minutes. There were no cases of PNF in this cohort. Thirty-day and 1-year patient survival rates were 99% and 95%, respectively. The 30-day and 1-year graft survivals rates were 95% and 93%, respectively. There were 10 grafts lost with 7 vascular complications (6 venous and 1 arterial thrombosis). There were 2 cases of chronic rejection and 1 graft lost to noncompliance. These statistics compare favorably with International Pancreas Transplant Registry reported 1-year survival for pancreas allografts. All other patients were insulin independent by discharge. Serum fasting blood glucose and serial amylase remained comparable at all intervals posttransplantation to those of a historical UW cohort. Within this range of cold ischemia times, HTK appears to provide effective pancreas preservation.     

Multicenter analysis of kidney preservation

BACKGROUND: Kidney preservation is an integral part of clinical kidney transplantation. Changes in the use of preservation methods and storage solutions, ischemic preservation times, and the relationship between ischemia time and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match have not been extensively studied in recent years. METHODS: The Collaborative Transplant Study database was used to analyze effects of kidney preservation methods and times. Graft survival and death-censored functional survival were used as endpoints. In all, 91,674 transplants from deceased donors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Cold storage accounted for more than 95% of kidney preservations from 1990-2005. Increasing ischemia up to 18 hr was not detrimental for graft outcome, whereas the risk of graft failure rose with ischemia 19-24 hr to relative risk (RR) 1.09, 25-36 hr to RR 1.16, and >36 hr to RR 1.30 (P<0.001). As compared to other preservation solutions, University of Wisconsin (UW) solution was associated with significantly better outcome when ischemia exceeded 24 hr. Short ischemia did not eliminate the effect of HLA matching. Kidneys from young or old donors were affected by prolonged ischemia to similar degrees. Pulsatile machine perfusion was not superior to cold storage. CONCLUSION: Kidneys from deceased donors should ideally be transplanted within 18 hr. Within the 18-hr window, the time of ischemia has no significant influence on graft survival. UW solution should be used if preservation for longer periods is envisioned. HLA matching improves graft survival regardless of length of ischemia.     

Evaluation of a novel cold storage solution (HBs) in a rat kidney transplant model.

We developed an improved solution for hypothermic storage (0-4 degrees C) of kidneys. The cold storage solution (HBS) was composed of macromolecules, high-energy cellular substrates, and a mixture of antiproteolytic amino acids, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory compounds. The objectives in developing this solution were to achieve superior metabolic support of the kidney during cold storage and to protect against ischemic injury. Inbred Brown Norway rats, weighing 225-250 g, were subjected to orthotopic ultrarapid technique for kidney isotransplantation to minimize warm ischemia and to test the preservation process. The kidney was transplanted after 12 h of preservation. The animals were divided into three groups based upon the preservation solution utilized: HBS solution, HTK solution (Custodiol), and UW solution (UWS)(ViaSpan). Among the recipients, each group had two subsets. The first subset of animals was used to assess survival at 7 days as well as the reperfusion damage index (RDI) based on the macroscopic physical characteristics of the kidney at the time of transplantation. The second subset in each group was utilized to measure serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen at 4 and 7 days, and histology at death or sacrifice. Mean +/- standard deviation (M +/- SD) was used for all parameters studied. The HBS solution showed significantly better protection at 12 h when compared to HTK and UW solutions. The reperfusion damage index (RDI) showed excellent preservation in the HBS (14 +/- 1), good preservation in UWS (13 +/- 1.5), and moderate preservation in the HTK (11 +/- 2) group. Histology was in concordance with the RDI, showing better histological findings with HBS and UW solutions than with the HTK group. Serum creatinine was significantly better in the HBS group when compared to HTK and UWS. Survival was statistically different, with 80% survival at 7 days in the HBS group, 20% survival in the HTK group, and 50% survival in the UWS group (p < .05). The HBS solution offered a new alternative for kidney cold storage with significantly better results when compared to the current gold standards of HTK and UW solutions in Brown Norway rats. This solution warrants further testing in other mammals.     

The use of UW solution in clinical transplantation. A 4-year experience.

The development of the University of Wisconsin (UW) cold storage solution has extended safe preservation of the liver and pancreas from 6 to 24 hours or more. From May 1987 until November 1991, 288 livers and 163 simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants were performed using UW solution. The mean preservation times were: liver, 12.7 +/- 4.4 hours, pancreas 17.2 +/- 4.4 hours, and kidney, 19.2 +/- 4.3 hours. Included in this series were 35 reduced-sized liver transplants, 7 cluster transplants, and 132 combined liver/pancreas retrievals. No differences in allograft function or graft-related complications were seen in organs preserved for less than or longer than 12 hours or in grafts from combined liver/pancreas retrievals. All pancreas/kidney transplants and most liver transplants were performed semi-electively. Actuarial 1-month patient and graft survival after liver transplantation was 91.4% and 80.2%, and at 4 years was 74.0% and 62.0%, respectively. After pancreas/kidney transplantation, the actuarial patient survival at 1 month and 4 years was 99.4% and 90.5%, respectively, whereas pancreatic and renal allograft survival at 1 month was 97.5% and 96.8%, and at 4 years was 83.0% and 83.4%, respectively. The ability to extend preservation times with UW solution has many advantages; however, the most important contribution of UW solution to clinical transplantation has been the increased utilization of scarce donor organs for more recipients because the previously imposed constraints on preservation time have been removed.     

Increased Primary Non-Function in Transplanted Deceased-Donor Kidneys Flushed with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution is increasingly used to flush and preserve organ donor kidneys, with efficacy claimed equivalent to University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. We observed and reported increased graft pancreatitis in pancreata flushed with HTK solution, which prompted this review of transplanting HTK-flushed kidneys. We analyzed outcomes of deceased-donor kidneys flushed with HTK and UW solutions with a minimum of 12 months follow-up, excluding pediatric and multi-organ recipients. We evaluated patient and graft survival and rejection rates, variables that might constitute hazards to graft survival and renal function. Two-year patient survival, rejection, renal function and graft survival were not different, but early graft loss (<6 months) was worse in HTK-flushed kidneys (p < 0.03). A Cox analysis of donor grade, cold ischemic time, panel reactive antibodies (PRA), donor race, first vs. repeat transplant, rejection and flush solution showed that only HTK use predicted early graft loss (p < 0.04; relative risk = 3.24), almost exclusively attributable to primary non-function (HTK, n = 5 (6.30%); UW, n = 1 (0.65%); p = 0.02). Delayed graft function and early graft loss with HTK occurred only in lesser grade kidneys, suggesting it should be used with caution in marginal donors.     

Kidney preservation in pigs with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solution

BACKGROUND: Although University of Wisconsin (UW) solution continues to be the most commonly used for intra-abdominal organs a new solution, Celsior, already utilized for heart and lungs, has been proposed for kidney and liver preservation. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of Celsior compared to UW on the immediate graft function of pig autotransplanted kidneys. METHODS: We used an autotransplantation pig model to avoid immunological interferences. After harvesting the graft was immediately bench perfused through the renal artery with 200 cc of solution and preserved for 24, 32 and 48 hrs. After cold ischemia grafts were autotransplanted on cava vein and aorta and a ureteral-ureteral anastomosis was performed. Contralateral nephrectomy was carried out at the end of this procedure. Each experimental group was composed of 5 animals. All animals were sacrificed after 1 week. RESULTS: All animals with 24 hr and 32 hr preserved grafts survived up to sacrifice; kidney function was recovered in all animals of 24 hr groups and in most of the animals of 32 hr preserved grafts (4/5) without any differences between the 2 solutions. In Celsior and UW 48 hr groups only 5 animals survived (3 and 2, respectively) and in all these animals kidney function was not totally recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that preservation of kidneys with the Celsior solution in the experimental setting is equivalent to UW solution.     

Histidine‐Tryptophan‐Ketoglutarate for Pancreas Allograft Preservation: The Indiana University Experience

Histidine‐tryptophan‐ketoglutarate solution (HTK) has been scrutinized for use in pancreas transplantation. A recent case series and a United Network for Organ Sharing data base review have suggested an increased incidence of allograft pancreatitis and graft loss with HTK compared to the University of Wisconsin solution (UW). Conversely, a recent randomized, controlled study failed to show any significant difference between HTK and UW for pancreas allograft preservation. This study was a retrospective review of all pancreas transplants performed at Indiana University between 2003 and 2009 comparing preservation with HTK or UW. Data included recipient and donor demographics, 7‐day, 90‐day and 1‐year graft survival, peak 30‐day serum amylase and lipase, HbA1c and C‐peptide levels. Of the 308 pancreas transplants, 84% used HTK and 16% UW. There were more SPK compared to pancreas after kidney and pancreas transplant alone in the HTK group. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. There was no significant difference in 7‐day, 90‐day or 1‐year graft survival, 30‐day peak serum amylase and lipase, HbA1c or C‐peptide. No clinically significant difference between HTK and UW for pancreas allograft preservation was identified. Specifically, in the context of low‐to‐moderate flush volume and short cold ischemia time (≤10 h), no increased incidence of allograft pancreatitis or graft loss was observed.     

Eurotransplant randomized multicenter kidney graft preservation study comparing HTK with UW and Euro-Collins

The aim was to evaluate the effect of HTK compared to UW and Euro-Collins (EC) on the initial graft function and long term graft survival in two prospective randomized studies. Only kidneys from heart-beating, kidney-only or kidney + heart donors were eligible for entry. Initial non-function (INF) was defined as the absence of life-sustaining renal function, requiring dialysis treatment on two or more occasions, during the first week after transplantation. To evaluate the contribution of the preservation solutions on INF in relation to other factors, a multivariate, 2-step logistic regression model was used. Randomization was performed between July 1990 and September 1992. The UW-HTK study comprised 342 donors and 611 transplants (UW: 168 donors and 297 transplants, HTK: 174 donors and 314 transplants). In the EC-HTK study 317 donors and 569 transplants were included (EC: 155 donors and 277 transplants, HTK: 162 donors and 292 transplants). INF occurred in 33 % of either HTK-(n = 105) or UW-(n = 99) preserved kidneys (P = NS), and in 29 % of the HTK-(n = 85) and in 43 % of the EC-(n = 119) preserved kidneys (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the preservation solution on the incidence of INF in the UW-HTK study, but factors contributing to INF were donor age, cause of death, retransplantation, and cold ischemic period. The EC-HTK study showed a significantly higher risk of INF, using EC as preservation, in addition to cold ischemic period and donor quality. The 3-year graft survival of HTK-preserved kidneys was 73 %, compared to 68 % for UW-preserved kidneys in the UW-HTK study (P = NS); while the 3-year graft survival of HTK preserved kidneys was 70 % compared to 67 % for EC-preserved kidneys in the EC-HTK study (P = NS). We can conclude that HTK is comparable to UW in its preservative abilities, using kidneys from heart-beating kidney-only donors, whereas EC as renal preservation solution should be avoided. Received: 2 November 1998 Received after revision: 10 August 1999 Accepted: 16 September 1999