Comparison of a 6-month course peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in treating Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan

Previous studies in Caucasian patients showed treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon/ribavirin was well tolerated, and produced a higher response rate especially in genotype 1 infections. However, it is unknown whether this conclusion can be extrapolated to patients with Chinese ethnic origin. A total of 153 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive either weekly injection of peginterferon alpha-2b 1.5 mcg/kg plus oral ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day, depending on body weight) (PEG group, n = 76) or 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b t.i.w. plus ribavirin (IFN group, n = 77) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as the sustained disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment by polymerase chain reaction assay. Baseline demographic, viral and histological characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, HCV genotype 1 patients showed a significantly higher SVR in patients receiving PEG-IFN rather than IFN (65.8%vs 41.0%, P = 0.019), but no difference was found in genotype non-1 patients (PEG vs IFN: 68.4%vs 86.8%, P = 0.060). Genotype 1 patients (28.6%) in the PEG-IFN group relapsed, as compared with 52.9% in the IFN group (P = 0.040). Multivariate analyses showed early virological response at week 12 of therapy and genotype non-1 were significant predictors to SVR. As compared with the IFN group, patients receiving PEG-IFN had a significantly higher rate of discontinuation, dose reduction, fever, headache, insomnia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. In genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patient, PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin had significantly better SVR and lower relapse rate when compared to IFN/ribavirin. Both regimens can be recommended for genotype non-1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patients. However, a higher rate of adverse events and discontinuance of therapy were noted in patients treated with PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin.     

Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for naïve patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of an induction dose of peginterferon alfa-2b (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin for initial treatment of patients with genotype 1 chronic HCV infection in a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. METHODS: Three hundred and eleven na?ve patients infected with genotype 1 and chronic hepatitis were randomly assigned to 48-week treatment with PEG-IFN once weekly (80-100 micrograms depending on body weight for 8 weeks, followed by 50 micrograms for the next 40 weeks), or standard interferon alfa-2b (IFN) 6 million units on alternate days, both in combination with ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day). RESULTS: PEG-IFN plus ribavirin significantly increased sustained virological response (SVR) compared with IFN plus ribavirin (41.1 vs. 29.3% respectively, P=0.030). Less patients discontinued PEG-IFN than IFN (19 vs. 31%, P=0.010). By logistic regression, SVR in the PEG-IFN group was independently associated with age <50 years, and mild fibrosis at liver biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with an induction dose of PEG-IFN was a more effective and better tolerated treatment for na?ve patients with genotype 1 than combination therapy with high dose standard IFN. In patients aged less than 50 years with mild fibrosis this schedule achieves a very high rate of SVR.     

聚乙二醇干扰素仪-2α／2b联合利巴韦林复治慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效观察

目的探讨聚乙二醇干扰素α（PEG-IFNα）联合利巴韦林治疗复发慢性丙型肝炎（CHC）患者的应答情况及影响因素。方法 30例经IFN-α或PEG-IFNα标准RGT治疗后复发的CHC患者,均用PEG-IFNα-2a（180μg）或PEG-IFNα-2b（1.5μg/kg）联合利巴韦林（900 mg/d）再治疗,基因1型治疗48周,非基因1型治疗24周,停药随访24周,分析病毒基因型、基线HCV RNA载量、初治药物种类对联合治疗疗效的影响。结果 30例复发患者经联合再治疗后,24例（80%）获得持续病毒学应答（SVR）。18例低病毒载量（HCV RNA≤105拷贝/ml）患者中,17例（94.4%）获得SVR,与高病毒载量组（58.3%）差异有统计学意义（P=0.026）。基因1型组18例,其中14例（77.8%）获得SVR,与非基因1型组（83.3%）差异无统计学意义（P=1.000）。初治应用PEG-IFNα联合利巴韦林抗病毒的患者17例,其中13例（76.5%）经再治疗后获得SVR,与初治应用IFN-α抗病毒组（84.6%）无明显差异（P=0.672）。结论 PEG-IFNα联合利巴韦林治疗复发CHC患者的疗效较好。基线病毒载量高,再治疗效果差;病毒基因型及初治所采用的IFN类型与再治疗的疗效无显著相关性。     

A multicenter survey of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan

Aim: This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. Methods: One hundred and forty‐three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non‐response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re‐treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. Results: Twenty‐five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re‐treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re‐treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re‐treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin‐28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re‐treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re‐treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re‐treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re‐treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re‐treatment.     

Twenty-four weeks of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin effectively treat patients with HCV genotype 6a

The optimal duration of treatment and expected response rate for hepatitis C virus genotype (HCV-6)-infected patients have not been determined. Our aims were to determine the treatment outcome with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin for HCV-6a-infected patients at Southwest Hospital and assess the association of the on-treatment virological response with the sustained virological response (SVR). Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-two HCV-6a-infected patients were treated for 24 weeks, and 21 (95.5%) achieved an early virological response (EVR), 20 (90.9%) an end-of-treatment response (ETR) and 18 (81.8%) a SVR. However, only 18 of the 22 HCV-6a-infected patients were tested for serum HCV RNA level at week 4 of treatment and 15 (83.3%) achieved a rapid virological response (RVR). The rates of SVR, RVR, EVR and ETR in these patients were all similar to those in HCV-2/3 treated for 24 weeks and higher than those in HCV-1b-infected patients treated for 48 weeks. A lower relapse rate (10.0%) was seen in HCV-6a compared with HCV-2/3 (12.5%) or HCV-1b-infected patients (23.3%). The positive predictive values of RVR and EVR for HCV-6a were comparable with those for HCV-2/3-infected patients (86.7%vs 90.9%, P = 0.683 and 85.7%vs 86.8%, P = 0.904, respectively). Of the 3 HCV-6a-infected patients who did not achieve a RVR, 2 achieved an EVR and went on to achieve a SVR. The patient who did not achieve an EVR did not achieve a SVR. In summary, our results indicate that 24 weeks of PEG-IFN plus ribavirin can effectively treat patients with HCV-6a chronic infection.     

慢性丙型肝炎干扰素治疗后复发患者干扰素联合利巴韦林再治疗

目的 探讨干扰素（IFN）治疗后复发的慢性丙型肝炎（CHC）患者对IFN联合利巴韦林再治疗的应答情况及影响因素。方法 100例IFN治疗后复发的CHC患者中，50例使用聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a（PEG—IFNα-2a），50例使用重组人干扰素α-1b（CIFNα—1b），均联合利巴韦林再治疗，联合治疗48周，停药随访24周，分析HCVRNA载量、病毒基因型、药物种类对联合治疗疗效的影响。结果 100例复发患者联合再治疗后，36．00％取得持续病毒学应答（SVR），其中PEG-IFNα-2a组48．00％取得SVR，显著高于CIFNα—1b组（24．00％，P〈0．05）。56例低病毒载量（HCV-RNA〈1×10^5拷贝／mL）患者中，PEG—IFNα-2a组28例，其中57．14％取得SVR，显著高于CIFNα—1b组（25．00％，P〈0．05）。HCV非基因1（2a或2b）型组29例，其中55．17％取得SVR，显著高于基因1型组（28．20％，P〈0．05）；在CIFNα—1b治疗组，病毒非基因1型17例患者，其中47．06％取得SVR，明显高于基因1型患者（12，12％，P〈0．01）；在基因1型组，PEG—IFNα-2a组38例，其中42．11％取得SVR，显著高于CIFNα—1b组（12．12％，P〈0.01）。结论 IFN治疗后复发的CHC患者IFN联合利巴韦林再治疗存在部分患者无应答；对于HCV病毒载量低、基因1型的复发患者，聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林再治疗疗效明显优于普通干扰素的联合治疗。     

Early identification of HCV genotype 1 patients responding to 24 weeks peginterferon alpha-2a (40 kd)/ribavirin therapy

Approximately one third of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) after 24 weeks of treatment with peginterferon alpha-2a (40 kd) plus ribavirin in a randomized, multinational trial. We aimed to identify factors associated with a rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4 (HCV RNA <50 IU/mL) and a SVR (HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at the end of follow-up) in these patients. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic factors for a RVR and SVR in genotype 1 patients treated for 24 weeks. Fifty-one of 216 (24%) genotype 1 patients in the 24-week treatment groups had a RVR. SVR rates were considerably higher in patients with than without [corrected] a RVR (89% vs. 19%, respectively). Patients with a baseline HCV RNA of less than 200,000 IU/mL (OR 9.7, 95% CI 4.2-22.5; P < .0001) or 200,000-600,000 IU/mL (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.5-9.1; P = .0057) were more likely to achieve a RVR than those with HCV RNA greater than 600,000 IU/mL. HCV subtype (1b vs. 1a) was also independently associated with RVR (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.9-3.7; P = .0954). RVR (OR 23.7 vs. no RVR, 95% CI 9.1-61.7) and baseline HCV RNA less than 200,000 IU/mL (OR 2.7 vs. > 600,000 IU/mL, 95% CI 1.1-6.3; P < .026) were significant and independent predictors of SVR in patients treated for 24 weeks. In conclusion, patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and treated with peginterferon alpha-2a/ribavirin sustained a RVR 24% of the time. This portends an 89% probability of a SVR after 24 weeks of treatment.     

Triple therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir for prior HCV non-responders

Approximately 170 million people are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide. Sustained virological response (SVR) is equivalent to viral eradication and associated with a reduction in the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The treatment for genotype 1 HCV chronic infection is the addition of a protease inhibitor (telaprevir or boceprevir) to the pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) regimen. Treatment of genotype 1 naïve chronic hepatitis C with PEG-IFN and ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks results in SVR in approximately 40% of patients. Retreatment of previous relapsers to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy with triple therapy, a protease inhibitor (telaprevir or boceprevir), plus PEG-IFN and RBV results in SVR in more than 70% of cases. However, retreatment of previous non-responders to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy with these triple therapies, results in SVR in less than 30% of cases. The aim of this review is to summarize results obtained with Boceprevir or Telaprevir triple therapy for prior HCV experienced patients (non-responders and relapsers).     

聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎的疗效及其影响因素

目的 观察聚乙二醇干扰素(PegIFN)α-2a联合利巴韦林(RBV)治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效及其影响因素,探讨治疗时间及药物累积用量与疗效之间的关系.方法对117例慢性丙型肝炎患者给予PegIFN α-2a联合RBV抗病毒治疗,PegIFN α-2a每周1次,皮下注射135 μg或180 μg,RBV按体质量每日分次口服800～1200mg,共治疗48周.分别在用药前,用药后4、12、24、36、48周以及停药后24周检测HCV RNA载量,检测部分患者HCV基因型,观察病毒学应答情况并分析影响疗效的因素.计数资料的比较用x2检验,P＜0.05为差异有统计学意义.结果 行基因型检测的29例患者中,1b型HCV感染21例,2a型HCV感染7例,1b和2a型混合HCV感染1例.117例患者中,88例获得了快速病毒学应答,96例(82.1%)获得了持续病毒学应答(SVR).年龄≤40岁、体质量＜75 kg、感染时间＜10年的患者可获得更好的疗效,SVR率明显高于年龄＞40岁、体质量≥75 kg、感染时间≥10年者(91.4%比72.9%,x2=6.796,P＜0.05;85%比50%,x2=5.433,P＜0.05;96.7%比77%,x2=5.852,P＜0.05).坚持全疗程的80%以上及PegIFN α-2a或RBV预计累积用量的80%以上可获得更好的疗效(x2值分别为16.971、16.971和43.212,P值均＜0.01).即使给予患者足够剂量的PegIFN α-2a(≥推荐剂量的80%),RBV减量(＜推荐剂量的80%)亦会使其SVR率下降[75.0%(27/36)比96.8%(60/62),x2=8.762,P＜0.01];获得快速病毒学应答的患者SVR率也明显下降[100.0%(51/51)比81.8%(18/22),x 2=6.614,P＜0.05].结论 PegIFN α-2a联合RBV治疗慢性丙型肝炎疗效显著,坚持80%PegIFN α-2a推荐剂量,80%以上RBV推荐剂量,以及80%推荐疗程可获得更好的疗效.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and to investigate the association between the length of the treatment period and the cumulative dose of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (PegIFN alpha-2a) plus ribavirin (RBV) and the effectiveness of antiviral therapy. Methods We analyzed data from 117 patients treated for 48 weeks with PEG-IFN alpha-2a (135 μ g or 180 μ g/week) plus weight-based RBV (800 mg/dfor patients ≤65 kg, 1000 mg/d for patients 65-75 kg and 1200 mg/d for patients ≥75 kg) under care at West China Hospital. HCV RNA was assessed at baseline, Week 4, 12 and 24, the end of treatment (EOT) and after 24 weeks follow-up (sustained virological response; SVR) with a test range of 1.0 x 103 to 5.0 x 107 IU/ml.Patients were stratified by age, gender, weight, route of transmission, duration of infection, baseline HCV RNA level and PegIFN alpha-2a or RBV dosage. Results HCV genotype was assessed in 29 patients (genotype 1b, 21; genotype 2a, 7; genotype 1b/2a, 1). Rapid virological response (RVR; HCV RNA negative at week 4), complete early virological response (cEVR; HCV RNA negative at week 12), EOT response, and SVR were achieved in 88 (75.2%), 110 (94%), 114 (97.4%) and 96 (82.1%) patients, respectively. Younger age, lower weight and shorter speculated infection years were associated with higher SVR rates (91.4% vs 72.9%, x2 = 6.796, P ＜ 0.05; 85% vs 50%, x2 = 5.433, P ＜ 0.05; 96.7% vs 77%, x2 = 5.852, P ＜ 0.05). SVR significantly increased with treatment length (38.5%, 66.7%, and 88.8% for ≤ 29 weeks, 29-38 weeks, and ≥38 weeks, respectively). SVR significantly increased with total cumulative treatment doses (38.5%, 66.7% and 88.8% for ≤ 60%, 60%-80% and ≥ 80% of PegIFN dose respectively; 33.3%, 85.3% and 96.8% for ≤ 60%,60%-80% and ≥ 80% in RBV dose respectively) in all patients. Less than 80% of standard dose of RBV was not sufficient even if given enough PegIFN (≥ 80% cumulative treatment dose) in patients who achieved RVR. Conclusion Chinese patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin have high rates of SVR.It is important to complete the target length of treatment and to continue the target dosage to achieve SVR.     

Immediate virological response predicts the success of shortterm peg-interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

AIM:To investigate the efficacy of short-term peginterferon(PEG-IFN)monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C patients who achieved an immediate virological response.METHODS:Defining an“immediate virological response(IVR)“as the loss of serum hepatitis C virus(HCV) RNA 7 d after the first administration of PEG-IFNα,we conducted a 12-wk course of PEG-IFNα2a monotherapy without the addition of ribavirin for 38 patients who had low pretreatment HCV RNA load and exhibited IVR.The patients included 21 men and 17 women...     

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C: The role of rapid and early virologic response

In patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4, the optimum duration of therapy and the predictors of sustained virologic response (SVR) have not been adequately determined. In this study, 358 patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 were randomly assigned to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha-2b (1.5 mug/kg/week) plus oral ribavirin (10.6 mg/kg/day) for a fixed duration of 48 weeks (control group, n = 50) or for a variable duration (n = 318). In the variable-duration group, patients with undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 were treated for 24 weeks (group A, n = 69), patients with undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 were treated for 36 weeks (group B, n = 79), and the rest of the patients were treated for 48 weeks (group C, n = 160). The primary endpoint was SVR (undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment cessation). Groups A-C and the control group had SVR rates of 86%, 76%, 56%, and 58%, respectively. After the study was controlled for predictors, a low baseline histologic grade and stage were associated with SVR (P < 0.029) in all groups. In addition, among patients in group C, older age (P = 0.04), a higher baseline body mass index (P = 0.013), and low baseline HCV RNA (P < 0.001) were also associated with SVR attainment. The incidence of adverse events and the rate of discontinuation were higher in patients in the variable-duration and fixed-duration groups treated for 48 weeks. Conclusion: In patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 and undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 4 and 12, treatment with PEG-IFN alpha-2b and ribavirin for 24 weeks and 36 weeks, respectively, is sufficient.     

Clinical trial results of peginterferons in combination with ribavirin

Of the large number of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), only about one third have progressive liver disease, and will eventually develop cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These are the patients for whom effective antiviral treatment is most needed. Therapy is currently recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C who have abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, detectable hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) in the blood, and significant necroinflammatory changes and/or fibrosis on liver biopsy. The current gold standard in terms of treatment efficacy is the combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin. The overall sustained virological response rate (SVR) with these regimens is 54 to 61% following 48 weeks of therapy. Patients with genotype 1 infection have a 42 to 51% likelihood of response to 48 weeks of therapy. Those with genotypes 2 or 3 infection will respond to 24 weeks of therapy in 78 to 82% of cases. These SVR rates are 5 to 10 percentage points higher in all patient groups than in those obtained with standard doses of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin. Retreatment of nonresponders to standard IFN monotherapy using PEG-IFN and ribavirin has achieved SVR rates of 34 to 40%. Retreatment of patients who relapsed after IFN monotherapy has resulted in an SVR rate of about 60%. A SVR after retreatment of relapsers and nonresponders with PEG-IFN and ribavirin is more likely in patients previously treated with IFN monotherapy, those with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, patients with low viral load (<2 million copies/mL), and individuals who had a significant decrease in HCV RNA levels during the initial treatment. The potential benefits of long-term anti-HCV suppressive therapy in nonresponders are currently under investigation.     

乙型和丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者的临床特征及抗病毒治疗的应答

目的 探讨HBV和HCV合并感染患者的临床特征及对聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a(PEGIFNα-2a)联合利巴韦林抗病毒疗效的影响.方法 对39例HBV和HCV合并感染患者的流行病学和病毒学资料进行回顾性分析,并观察PEGIFNα-2a联合利巴韦林治疗的病毒学应答情况.数据行χ~2检验和t检验.结果 39例HBV和HCV合并感染患者中,HCV优势株型35例,占89.7%;HBV和HCV混合优势株型4例,占10.3%.39例合并感染组患者HBeAg阳性率为15.4%,明显低于42例单纯HBV感染者的45.3%(χ~2=8.446,P=0.004).合并感染组患者的HBV DNA平均值为(4.6±O.9)lg拷贝/mL,,明显低于单纯HBV感染组的(5.9±1.2)lg拷贝/mL(t=5.544,P<0.01).在29例基因1型患者中,合并感染组的部分早期病毒学应答率为51.7%,明显高于25例单纯HCV感染组的24.0%(χ~2=4.432,P=0.037);治疗结束时病毒学应答率为93.1%,也明显高于HCV感染组的56.0%(χ~2=10.112,P=0.001);复发率为55.6%,也明显高于HCV感染组的21.4%(χ~2=4.360,P=0.037).非基因1型患者中,合并感染组与HCV感染组的快速病毒学应答、完全早期病毒学应答、部分早期病毒学应答、治疗结束时病毒学应答、持续病毒学应答和复发率相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).合并感染组39例患者中有15例出现不良反应,占38.5%,单纯HCV感染组25例患者中有6例出现不良反应,占17.6%(χ~2=3.851,P=0.049).结论 HBV和HCV合并感染以HCV为优势病毒株,HBV复制受抑制.与单纯HCV感染相比.基因1型患者部分早期病毒学应答、治疗结束时病毒学应答和复发率高,持续病毒学应答相似;合并感染对非基因1型病毒学应答率无影响.     

Predictive value of rapid virological response and early virological response on sustained virological response in HCV patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The therapeutic effect of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-alpha-2a combination with ribavirin on patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is dependent on the rapidity of the virological response. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of rapid virological response (RVR) and early virological response (EVR) on sustained virological response (SVR) in HCV patients treated with peg-IFN-alpha-2a and ribavirin. METHODS: The HCV genotypes of 105 patients with chronic hepatitis C were detected by enzyme-immunoassay. Patients received subcutaneous 180 microg peg-IFN-alpha-2a once weekly plus daily ribavirin. Patients with genotype 1 were treated for 48 weeks and patients with genotype 2 or 3 were treated for 24 weeks. HCV RNA was assessed by qualitative PCR at pretreatment, at weeks 4 and 12 during treatment, and at week 24 of follow-up. Virological response rates at different weeks were investigated, with RVR defined as serum HCV RNA undetectable after 4 weeks and EVR defined as HCV RNA either undetectable or decrease by >or=2 log(10) after 12 weeks. The effects of virological response rates at different weeks on SVR were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients, 44 (41.9%) were genotype 1, 46 (43.8%) were genotype 2, and 15 (14.3%) were genotype 3. RVR rates (19.5%) of patients with genotype 1 were significantly lower than those (60.7%) of genotype 2 or 3 (chi(2) = 16.836, P = 0.000); and EVR rates (73.2%) of patients with genotype 1 were significantly lower than those (96.7%) of genotype 2 or 3 (chi(2) = 12.220, P = 0.000). The SVR rates (86.7%) of patients who had achieved RVR were significantly higher than those (43.9%) of patients who had not achieved RVR (chi(2) = 19.713, P = 0.000). The positive predictive value of RVR in all patients was higher than that of EVR, but there was no significant difference between RVR and EVR. The negative predictive value of RVR in all patients or with genotype 1 was significantly lower than that of EVR. In univariate analysis, HCV RNA level (P = 0.014), genotype (P = 0.001), RVR (P = 0.000) and EVR (P = 0.000) were associated with effect of treatment. However, in stepwise regression analysis, the independent factors associated with effect of antiviral therapy were RVR (OR = 6.501, P = 0.001), EVR (OR = 2.776, P = 0.003) and genotype (OR = 3.061, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The RVR and EVR rates of patients with genotype 1 were significantly lower than those of patients with genotype 2 or 3. RVR had a similar predictive value as EVR on SVR. Genotype, HCV RNA level, RVR and EVR were associated with SVR. Genotype, RVR and EVR were independent factors for predicting the effect of antiviral therapy.     

Impact of shorter duration of treatment on virological response rate in genotype 2 or 3 chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of shortened duration of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RIB) treatment on sustained virological response (SVR) rates in treatment-naomicronve patients with chronic hepatitis due to genotype 2 or 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and high pre-treatment viral load (>800,000 IU/mL). METHODS: Records of 142 patients with chronic hepatitis C (22 with cirrhosis) who had been treated with PEG-IFN and RIB for 24 weeks (Group A, n=88), both drugs for 12-16 weeks (Group B, n=39), or with PEG-IFN for 12-16 weeks and RIB for 24 weeks (Group C, n=15), were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Overall, 81.7% of patients had SVR (Group A: 88.6%, Group B: 69.2% and Group C: 73.3%, p=0.02). Failure to achieve SVR was significantly related to treatment group (p=0.026 for Group B and p=0.002 for Group C, versus Group A), older age (p=0.023), higher liver biopsy stage (p=0.001) and presence of cirrhosis (p< 0.0001). In patients without cirrhosis, only the treatment group (p=0.018 for Group B and p=0.002 for Group C, compared to Group A) independently predicted failure to achieve SVR. CONCLUSION: Shorter duration of PEG-IFN treatment (12-16 weeks) adversely affected the SVR rate in patients with genotype 2 or 3 HCV infection. However, increasing the duration of RIB administration (12-16 weeks versus 24 weeks) in such patients did not have any beneficial effect on SVR in patients receiving short-duration PEG-IFN.     

冷球蛋白血症对丙型肝炎患者病毒学应答的影响

目的 探讨在应用聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林抗病毒治疗的慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者中,冷球蛋白血症对抗病毒治疗效果的影响. 方法 40例接受聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林抗病毒治疗的CHC患者进入研究,检测HCV基因型与基线、用药后4周、12周及治疗结束后24周患者血清HCV RNA水平,并检测基线患者血清中的冷球蛋白.连续型变量用独立样本t检验或秩和检验,分类资料用x2检验或Fisher' s精确概率法,对抗病毒治疗效果相关影响因素的分析用多元logistic回归分析.结果 治疗4周后快速病毒学应答发生率在冷球蛋白阳性患者(6/18,33.3％)低于阴性患者(15/22,68.2％,P=0.028).冷球蛋白阳性患者的持续病毒学应答发生率也低于阴性患者(0对比6/6,P=0.012).结论 冷球蛋白阳性的CHC患者快速病毒学及持续病毒学应答疗效低于冷球蛋白阴性的CHC患者.     

Triple therapy for HCV genotype 1 infection: telaprevir or boceprevir?

Boceprevir and telaprevir are the first two protease inhibitors available for the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. A sustained virological response (SVR) of 70-80% is observed when either of these protease inhibitors is utilized with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) in treatment na?ve patients. Both agents are also highly effective in patients who failed to achieve a SVR during previous treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV. A rapid virological response (RVR) is observed in 56-60% of treatment na?ve patients. Patients who achieve a RVR can be treated with a shorter course of therapy (24-28 weeks) and still achieve a SVR rate of 90% or higher. Patients who do not achieve a RVR, those with cirrhosis and certain prior non-responders should be treated for 48 weeks. Although the SVR rates observed with boceprevir and telaprevir are quite similar both globally and within sub-populations, the treatment algorithms for the two agents are unique. The decision of which protease inhibitor to use should assess several factors including the treatment scheme, duration of therapy, adverse event profile, cost and the likelihood of achieving a RVR. The latter is highly dependent upon IFN sensitivity and the IL28B genotype.     

Chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 6 infection: response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin

BACKGROUND: To date, no study has evaluated pegylated interferon for the treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6. We aimed to determine the efficacy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for treating infection with genotype 6 versus genotype 1. METHODS: Forty-two patients chronically infected with HCV (for genotype 1, [Formula: see text]; for genotype 6, [Formula: see text]) were treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a ([Formula: see text]) or alpha-2b ([Formula: see text]) combined with oral ribavirin for 48 weeks. RESULTS: There was no difference between genotypes 1 and 6 in the rates of early virological response (76% vs. 81%; [Formula: see text]) and end-of-treatment response (71% vs. 81%; [Formula: see text]). Patients infected with genotype 6 had a higher rate of sustained virological response (SVR) than did patients infected with genotype 1 (86% vs. 52%; [Formula: see text]). The overall adverse-effects profile was similar in both genotype groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of SVR between patients receiving pegylated interferon alpha-2a and those receiving alpha-2b. Multivariate analysis showed that genotype was the only significant factor associated with SVR ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks resulted in a significantly higher rate of SVR in patients infected with genotype 6 than in those infected with genotype 1. Further studies are required to determine whether lower dosages and 24 weeks of therapy may be sufficient for the treatment of genotype 6 infection.     

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C in clinical practice: The German Open Safety Trial

The combination treatment of peginterferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN alpha-2a; Pegasys) plus ribavirin (RBV) is recommended as a standard care for HCV infections. Side effects and aspects of efficacy and safety have to be balanced. This study evaluates clinical practice data on safety and efficacy of HCV treatment with PEG-IFN in combination with RBV over 24 and 48 weeks. This study was a phase III, multi-centre, open-label study with two treatment groups: PEG-IFN in combination with RBV for 24 or 48 weeks. The allocation to the treatment groups was at the discretion of the investigator; 309 patients entered active treatment: 90 patients received PEG-IFN plus RBV for 24 weeks and 219 patients PEG-IFN plus RBV for 48 weeks. A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 48.9% of all patients. Genotype 1 patients with a 48-week combination treatment achieved an SVR of 39.9%. In the 48-week group a low baseline viral load was associated with a higher SVR rate (47.0% vs. 32.4%). For genotype 2 or 3 patients, the SVR was 67.9%. For these patients there was no relevant difference between patients with low and high viral loads; 97.7% of the patients experienced at least one adverse event. The incidence of serious adverse events was distinctly lower in the 24-week group (4.4% vs. 10.5%). This investigation confirms the well-known risk-benefit ratio found in controlled studies in a clinical practice setting. The safety profile is similar and shows the highest incidence of adverse events in the first 12 weeks of treatment.     

Therapy outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C: role of therapy supervision by expert hepatologists

Previous large multicentre trials reported sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 45-80% in chronically infected hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. However, it is unclear whether such a treatment success is also achieved in daily routine and to what extent it depends on expert hepatological supervision. This was retrospectively analysed in patients presenting at our outpatient department during May 1997 and March 2004 and receiving at least one treatment dose. A total of 302 treatment-naive HCV patients [72% genotypes 1 or 4 (n = 215), 25% genotypes 2/3 (n = 78) and 3% undetermined genotype (n = 9)] were included in the analysis. Out of these, 196 patients consulted an expert hepatologist at least once every 3 months during treatment [regular visitors (RV)], whereas in 106 patients treatment was performed and supervised by a general practitioner (irregular visitors). Both patient groups did not differ in their baseline characteristics. However, the virological response rates at the end of treatment (ETR; 146/196, 74%vs 51/106, 48%, P < 0.001) and 6 months thereafter (SVR; 129/196, 66%vs 36/106, 34%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in RV. In patients treated with pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin, this difference was statistically highly significant (P < 0.001) for HCV genotypes 1 and 4 (treated patients: SVR: 62/101, 61%vs 14/51, 27%, P < 0.001), but not for genotypes 2/3. SVR rates were also significantly better in RV with advanced liver damage [SVR 69% (22/32) vs 25% (5/20), P = 0.004]. In regular and irregular visitors treatment was discontinued in 7% (14/196) and 15% (16/106) respectively (P = 0.015). Patients with unfavourable genotypes 1 and 4 or with advanced liver damage benefit from HCV therapy supervision by a specialist, probably because of less frequent treatment interruptions or dose reductions.