Acute appendicitis in children under 3 years of age. Diagnostic and therapeutic problems

Aim: Analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic problems in acute appendicitis in children below 3 years of age. Material and methods: The analysis was based on medical data of 53 children under 3 years of age, treated in our department for acute appendicitis in the years 1988-2008. Among 53 children, 29 (53.7%) were admitted directly to the surgical department and 24 (45.3%) were transferred from the regional pediatric department. In the period of 1 month before admission to the surgical department 13 patients (24.5%) were treated as outpatients due to acute respiratory or alimentary tract infection. On the basis of the data from the case histories, the most frequent symptoms and their duration were evaluated, as well as the clinical signs, intraoperative diagnosis and the postoperative course. Results: The most frequent symptoms and clinical signs in this group of children were: abdominal pain, vomiting and fever, present in 83.0%, 75.5%, and 67.0% patients respectively. The mean time of the symptoms' duration was 3.6 days. The most frequently found physical signs on admission to the surgical ward were: abdominal pain on palpation, increased tonus of abdominal muscles and abdominal distension. On laparotomy gangrenous appendicitis was found in 49% of the children operated. In 24.5% of patients perforation of the appendix was confirmed. Further complications occurred in 9 children (16.9%). The average stay in hospital after the operation lasted 7.9 days. Conclusions: 1. Acute appendicitis in small children is a diagnostic problem not only for primary health care doctors but also for experienced pediatricians and pediatric surgeons. 2. Early surgical consultation should be a standard procedure in small children with acute symptoms of various locations when there is accompaning abdominal pain, not reacting to conservative treatment. Surgical consultation is also indicated in children under 3 years of age with relapses of abdominal pain. 3. Clinical signs of appendicitis in children aged less than 3 years, may differ from those in older children due to changes in their immunological reactivity. This problem should be included in under-graduate and post-graduate medical studies.     

Pediatric appendicitis in "real-time": the value of sonography in diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of sonography in the diagnosis of clinically equivocal appendicitis, and to identify the factors leading to an inaccurate ultrasound diagnosis. The impact of sonographic findings on clinical management and outcome of children with appendicitis is examined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 317 children who attended the emergency department (ED) of a children's hospital for acute abdominal pain for which acute appendicitis was the main differential diagnosis. They had ultrasound because the diagnosis was uncertain clinically. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of ultrasound for appendicitis was 0.92, and the negative predictive value was 0.88. The sensitivity and specificity could not be determined because there were 43 patients with equivocal ultrasound results. The pitfalls hindering the accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis included a high incidence of perforated appendicitis at presentation, the retrocecal appendix, and other technical factors such as abdominal guarding, excessive bowel gas, obesity, inadequate bladder filling, and the uncooperative patient. When ultrasound findings were combined with clinical judgment in clinical management, there were only five cases of non-therapeutic laparotomy and eight cases of delayed surgery due to missed diagnosis in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is a useful for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in children. However, in the setting of a pediatric hospital ED, the accuracy of ultrasound and its ability to improve early hospital triage may be reduced. Repeated clinical review is still essential and in selected cases, appendiceal CT scan may be required to guide therapeutic decision making.     

Diagnosing appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain

Differentiating acute appendicitis from other causes of acute abdominal pain in children frequently remains unsatisfactory. To determine whether initial historical and physical examination findings might predict final diagnoses, 246 patients with complaints of nontraumatic and nonrecurrent acute abdominal pain were studied. All were between three and 18 years of age and had presented to a hospital-based pediatric emergency department. Each family was telephoned an average of 5.1 days after the visit to determine the patient's subsequent clinical course; operative notes and pathology reports were reviewed for patients receiving surgery. Of these patients with acute abdominal pain, both fever and vomiting were present in 18 of the 24 who eventually had diagnoses of appendicitis, compared with 49 of 222 patients with other final diagnoses (P less than 0.01, with negative predictive value 0.97, sensitivity 0.75, and specificity 0.78, but positive predictive value only 0.27). The duration of the pain at presentation and the frequency of other symptoms (eg, diarrhea, dysuria, anorexia, and lethargy) were unrelated, however, to final diagnosis, as was the duration of the pain and whether abdominal tenderness initially was localized or generalized. Nonruptured appendicitis was generally indistinguishable from ruptured appendicitis preoperatively, by both duration and symptoms. Boys were found more likely to have appendicitis (with or without rupture) than girls (18/118 or 15%, vs. 6/128 or 5%, P less than 0.05). In conclusion, fever and vomiting were noted at presentation more frequently in children with appendicitis than in children with other causes of acute abdominal pain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Primary omental torsion in children

Objective : A retrospective review was conducted to establish the prevalence and clinical features of omental torsion or infarction as a cause of acute abdominal pain in childhood.
Methodology : The case records were analysed for all patients admitted with primary omental pathology to the Department of General Surgery, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, between January 1975 and July 1994.
Results : From 1975 to 1994 (20 years) 13 children were admitted to our General Surgical Department with primary omental disease. There were nine males and four females under 16 years of age. The presenting complaint was abdominal pain with vomiting or diarrhoea. Four children had major medical conditions. Pre-operative diagnosis in all cases was acute appendicitis. Appendicectomy and omentectomy were performed without complication in all cases. Histology of the omentum demonstrated torsion, infarction or haemorrhage.
Conclusions : All children presented with features of acute appendicitis, a majority were male, and two out of the 13 patients were obese. The absence of any children under 4 years was consistent with the relative paucity of omental fat in younger children. We found no clear mechanism for primary omental torsion, although rotation around the right epiploic artery was observed.     

Acute abdomen in children due to extra-abdominal causes

Background: Acute abdominal pain in children is a common cause for referral to the emergency room and for subsequent hospitalization to pediatric medical or surgical departments. There are rare occasions when the abdominal pain is derived from extra-abdominal organs or systems. The aim of the present study was to establish the most common extra-abdominal causes of acute abdominal pain.
Methods: The notes of all children (1 month–14 years of age) examined for acute abdominal pain in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department of Alexandroupolis District University Hospital in January 2001–December 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical signs and symptoms, and laboratory findings were recorded, as well as the final diagnosis and outcome.
Results: Of a total number of 28 124 children who were brought to the A&E department, in 1731 the main complaint was acute abdominal pain. In 51 children their symptoms had an extra-abdominal cause, the most frequent being pneumonia ( n  = 15), tonsillitis ( n  = 10), otitis media ( n  = 9), and acute leukemia ( n  = 5).
Conclusion: Both abdominal and extra-abdominal causes should be considered by a pediatrician who is confronted with a child with acute abdominal pain.     

Clinical spectrum of acute abdominal pain in Turkish pediatric patients: A prospective study

Abstract Background : The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence, associated symptoms, and clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain who had been admitted to an emergency department. Methods : Children aged between 2 and 16 years who presented to the emergency department of Cerrahpa?a Medical School, Istanbul University between July 2001 and August 2002 with acute abdominal pain were enrolled in this study. A questionnaire was completed each patient admitted to our pediatric emergency unit for acute abdominal pain. Data collected included presenting signs and symptoms, the hospital follow up for all children who returned within 10 days, test results, and telephone follow up. Results : The number of children referred to the emergency department was 7442, with 399 (5.4%) of these having acute abdominal pain. The mean age of the study population was 6.9 ± 3.5 years, and 201 of the patients were male. The five most prevalent diagnoses were: (i) upper respiratory tract infection and/or complicated with otitis media or sinusitis (23.7%); (ii) abdominal pain with uncertain etiology (15.4%); (iii) gastroenteritis (15.4%); (iv) constipation (9.4%); and (v) urinary tract infection (8%). The most common associated symptoms were decreased appetite, fever and emesis. Because of follow‐up deficiency the progress of 28 patients was not obtained. Eighty‐two children were referred to the department of pediatric surgery, but only 17 of 82 (20.7%) required surgical intervention (15 of these 17 for appendicitis). Eleven patients returned within 10 days for re‐evaluation, but the initial diagnosis was not changed. The complaints of 57 patients with uncertain etiology were resolved within 2 days. Conclusions : An acute complaint of abdominal pain was usually attributed to a self‐limited disease. However, the percentage of surgical etiology is not negligible.     

Improving the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children with atypical clinical findings using the technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime-labelled white-blood-cell abdomen scan

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing acute appendicitis in children with equivocal signs and symptoms may be difficult. The usual approach is hospital observation and frequent re-examination. However, many surgeons are reluctant to delay surgery because of the risk of perforation and a negative laparotomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the value of the technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime ((99m)Tc-HMPAO)-labelled white-blood-cell (WBC) abdomen scan in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children with atypical clinical presentation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty children with acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain and possible acute appendicitis, but atypical findings were included. After IV injection of (99m)Tc-HMPAO-labelled WBCs, serial anterior abdomen scans were obtained using a gamma camera. RESULTS: Thirty-three children underwent surgery, while 17 children were managed conservatively and were followed up for at least 1 month. Four children had false-positive results and one child had a false-negative scan result. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the scan to diagnose acute appendicitis in children with atypical findings was 96.7, 80.0, 90.0, 87.8 and 94.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The (99m)Tc-HMPAO WBC abdomen scan is a potential tool for diagnosing acute appendicitis in children with atypical clinical findings. The high sensitivity and negative predictive value allows early discharge from the emergency department to avoid costly observation in hospital and potentially unnecessary surgery in those patients with negative scans.     

Primary torsion of the omentum in children

Primary torsion of the omentum is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain in children. Patients usually present with a clinical picture of acute appendicitis. We report on three children with this condition who were managed by partial omentectomy with a satisfactory outcome in each case.     

Ovarian torsion caused by teratoma masquerading as perforated appendicitis in a 5-year-old girl

Ovarian torsion is a well-known but poorly recognized disease. Although ovarian torsion is the most common complication of ovarian tumors in children, it is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain in pediatric patients. Ovaries can be only salvaged by prompt diagnosis and timely surgical intervention. Acute ovarian torsion without appropriate treatment may result in loss of ovarian function, tissue necrosis, and death. The objective of this article is to present a case of pediatric ovarian torsion and describe the difficulty of distinguishing it from perforated appendicitis in the emergency department (ED). We report a 5-year-old girl who presented to the ED with nausea, tenderness over the right lower guardant of her abdomen, fever, and anorexia. She was initially diagnosed with appendicitis based on physical examination and abdominal computed tomography scan and was sent to the operating room for surgical exploration. The definite diagnosis of the patient was acute ovarian torsion complicated with cystic teratoma. Primary clinicians in the ED should pay more attention to acute ovarian torsion in young children because it is difficult to diagnose in time to salvage the gynecological function when the clinical presentations masquerade as perforated appendicitis.     

小儿急性阑尾炎手术中腹腔冲洗的必要性探讨

目的通过对比各型小儿阑尾炎术中行腹腔冲洗与未行腹腔冲洗的疗效,探讨术中行腹腔冲洗的必要性。方法收集本院近3年内收治的急性阑尾炎病例共350例,其中A组为单纯性阑尾炎,行腹腔镜阑尾切除术;B、C组为化脓性阑尾炎未穿孔,B组行腹腔镜阑尾切除+腹腔引流术,C组行腹腔镜阑尾切除+腹腔冲洗+腹腔引流术;D、E组为坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎,D组行腹腔镜阑尾切除+腹腔引流术,E组行腹腔镜阑尾切除+腹腔冲洗+腹腔引流术。术后对患者资料进行详细统计和相应分析。结果急性单纯性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术后患儿预后良好。急性化脓性阑尾炎组术中行腹腔冲洗后,术后患儿肛门排气排便时间、直肠刺激症状、间断腹痛情况明显增加,且术后腹腔脓肿的发生率明显增多,术后5 d血常规白细胞稍高,1例并发右侧膈下脓肿,平均住院时间较未冲洗组明显延长;相反,急性坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎组,术中行腹腔冲洗后,患儿术后舡门排气排便时间缩短,术后腹腔残余感染、直肠刺激症状、间断腹痛情况降低,术后腹腔脓肿等并发症的发生率降低,术后5 d血白细胞较未冲洗组稍低。术后患儿恢复相对较快,住院时间短。结论小儿急性阑尾炎术中冲洗治疗应根据具体情况选择合适的方法,术中调节体位,充分显露脓腔,引流彻底,引流管位置适宜;急性化脓性阑尾炎未穿孔者不需行腹腔冲洗,而急性坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎则需术中行腹腔冲洗。     

Optimizing the role of imaging in appendicitis

Acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal condition that requires surgical intervention in childhood. From the diagnostic performance perspective, computed tomography (CT) has a significantly higher sensitivity than does ultrasound (US) for diagnosing appendicitis in children; from the safety perspective, however, one should consider the radiation associated with CT, especially in children. There is strong evidence supporting improved patient outcomes in children with suspected acute appendicitis who undergo CT scanning. Nevertheless, we should keep in mind that for a single abdominal CT study in a 5-year-old child, the lifetime risk of radiation-induced cancer would be 26.1 per 100,000 in female and 20.4 per 100,000 in male patients, based on probabilistic models designed with data from atomic bomb survivors. An integrated clinical-imaging approach, applying clinical scores that are able to predict which children with acute abdominal pain do or do not have a high probability of presenting with appendicitis may improve the effectiveness of the imaging diagnosis of appendicitis at the hospital level. Such an approach could avoid exposure of children who at low risk for appendicitis to unnecessary diagnostic tests and eventually, to radiation.     

Prospective evaluation of admission for acute abdominal pain in children

Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is one of the most frequent causes of admission to an emergency department of a childrens' hospital. The diagnosis viewed with the most apprehension is acute appendicitis. We present the results of a prospective study on the evaluation of the clinical and paraclinical symptoms generally observed in an AAP, and discuss the benefit of a diagnostic score for acute appendicitis. Twenty-five different diagnoses were observed, the 5 most frequent being: "non specific" (34.2%), constipation (16%), otorhinolaryngological infection (11.6%), gastroenteritis (10.7%) and acute appendicitis (10.5%). The study of 12 symptoms showed an elevated sensitivity for each one (92-50%), but a low positive predictive value (72-12%). Rigid adhesion to a diagnostic score would have led to unnecessary medical examination.     

Acute abdomen caused by Salmonella typhi acute appendicitis

Salmonella infections can manifest themselves as acute abdominal problems and lead to emergency surgery. Some examples are: salmonella-related intestinal perforations, gallbladder involments, salpingitis, and peritonitis. Mesenteric lymphadenitis associated with salmonella mimics acute appendicitis and it is often difficult to establish a timely and tempestive diagnosis in children with right lower abdominal pain. Because of the difficult diagnostic process, a significant number of patients with salmonella infections present acute abdomen and undergo needless operations. Instead, in our case of salmonella-related acute abdomen, laparotomy was the right therapeutic choice. The conclusion is drawn that, even if there is not a precise diagnosis, in salmonella-related acute abdomen the surgical approach is the right choice, considering the high morbidity and mortality associated with untreated appendicitis and intestinal perforations.     

Diagnosing appendicitis: What works,what does not and where to go from here?

Although acute appendicitis is the most common reason for emergency abdominal surgery in children, diagnosis is far from straightforward. Delays in diagnosis can result in significant complications, whereas over‐diagnosis can result in costly inter‐hospital transfers and unnecessary surgery. This article aims to describe current evidence‐based assessment of children with possible appendicitis presenting to the emergency department. We provide an overview of the literature relating to the various available diagnostic approaches, including the application of history, examination, pathology tests, imaging, and clinical decision rules.     

Granulomatous appendiceal disease in cystic fibrosis

Abdominal pain due to acute appendicitis in patients with cystic fibrosis is uncommon. A review of 572 patients with cystic fibrosis from the cystic fibrosis clinic of the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh from 1959 to 1983 disclosed only 4 in whom the diagnosis of acute appendicitis lead to appendectomy. In 3 of these the diagnosis was confirmed at operation. In 1 child, laparotomy for a persistent asymptomatic abdominal mass disclosed a huge cecal fecaloma originating in the appendiceal lumen. Histological examination of the appendix established the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Large, symptomatic appendiceal granulomas were noted in 6 other children; these simulated abdominal tumors in 2. In 3 others there was smoldering infection and abscess with sepsis and in 1 a colocystic fistula. Such chronic granulomas, acute appendicitis, meconium ileus, and nonsurgical abdominal pain in cystic fibrosis can best be differentiated by careful clinical examination before and after treatment for meconium ileus equivalent. The granulomas involve not only the appendix but also the cecum and ascending colon. Contrast X-ray studies are of little value in diagnosis. The appendix in cystic fibrosis undergoes changes that are diagnostic even in the newborn; the granulomas described here appear to represent a progression of these changes.Offprint requests to: W. K. Sieber     

Oxycodone vs placebo in children with undifferentiated abdominal pain: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of the effect of analgesia on diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND: Analgesics for children with acute abdominal pain are often withheld for fear that they might mask physical examination findings and thus might be unsafe. This viewpoint has been challenged recently. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of buccal oxycodone on pain relief, physical examination findings, diagnostic accuracy, and final clinical outcomes in children with acute abdominal pain. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial between December 2001 and November 2003. SETTING: University teaching hospital in Finland.Patients A total of 104 children aged 4 to 15 years with abdominal pain of less than 7 days' duration were screened, and 63 children with pain scores of 5 or higher on a 10-cm visual analog scale were eligible for the trial.Intervention Children were randomized to receive buccally either 0.1 mg/kg(-1) of oxycodone hydrochloride (n = 32) or the same volume of normal saline (n = 31). The same surgeon described the physical findings and indicated a provisional diagnosis and a provisional disposition before the children received the study medication and at 1 hour and 3.5 hours after initial dosing. Pain scores were recorded at baseline and every 30 minutes for 3.5 hours after the first study drug administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity difference, presence or absence of abdominal guarding, and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics, initial pain scores, and physical signs and symptoms were similar between the 2 groups. Both study drugs were associated with decreasing pain scores. The summed pain intensity difference over 7 observations was significantly greater in the oxycodone group, 22 +/- 18 cm, than in the placebo group, 9 +/- 12 cm (mean difference 13 cm, with a 95% confidence interval of 2-24 cm; P = .04). The diagnostic accuracy increased from 72% to 88% in the oxycodone group and remained at 84% in the placebo group after study drug administration. Laparotomy was performed in 17 patients in the oxycodone group and in 14 patients in the placebo group. Four patients without appendicitis underwent exploratory laparotomy in each group. One patient in the placebo group was initially diagnosed as having nonspecific abdominal pain, but at 14 hours, she was operated on for appendiceal perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of buccal oxycodone provides a significant pain relief to children with acute abdominal pain, without adversely altering the clinical signs or obscuring the surgical diagnosis.     

Appendicular colic and the non-inflamed appendix: fact or fiction?

AIMS: Appendicoliths cause acute appendicitis and appendicular perforation. Do appendicoliths cause acute abdominal pain in the absence of acute appendicitis? METHODS: A retrospective observational study was undertaken of histology reports of all appendicectomy specimens from children < 16 years of age between January 1995 and December 2001. Specimens were categorised as perforated or uncomplicated acute appendicitis, non-inflamed, and "incidental" (removed during abdominal surgery for other indications). The presence of an appendicolith was noted. Clinical details were supplemented by selected case note review. Specimens in which the diagnosis of appendicitis or the presence of an appendicolith were not clearly defined (n = 20) were reviewed by an experienced, independent pathologist. RESULTS: 601 consecutive appendicectomy reports were analysed. The mean age of the study population was 9 years (range 1 day - 15.9 years) and there were 357 boys. An appendicolith was identified in 31/118 (26%) cases of perforated appendicitis, 60/352 (17%) cases of uncomplicated appendicitis, 12/59 (20%) cases of non-inflamed appendices, and only 1/72 (1%) cases of incidental appendicectomies. All patients with an appendicolith in the non-inflamed appendix group had presented with acute abdominal pain mimicking acute appendicitis. The frequency of an appendicolith in perforated appendicitis was significantly greater than in uncomplicated acute appendicitis (chi (2) = 4.8, 1 df, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the frequency of an appendicolith between non-inflamed appendices and acute appendicitis (either perforated or intact). Appendicoliths were rarely found in incidental appendicectomies, but these patients were younger. The frequency of appendicoliths in non-inflamed appendices was much greater than that expected from published autopsy data. CONCLUSION: Appendicoliths may cause acute abdominal pain that mimics acute appendicitis.     

Appendicite aiguë de l’enfant : la classique « absence de parallélisme anatomoclinique » : un mythe ?

Diagnosis of appendicitis in children represents a continuing diagnostic dilemma for emergency room physicians and paediatric surgeons. If unnecessary surgery should be avoided, delayed diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis is responsible for complications. Use of a diagnostic clinical score may improve the management of children with abdominal pain. A prospective evaluation of an appendicitis score is presented here.     

Association of streptococcal pharyngitis with complicated appendicitis]

Streptococcal pharyngitis can be accompanied by right lower abdominal quadrant pain, which often is linked to mesenteric adenitis. We report on a case of such misleading association in a child. CASE REPORT: A 6-year-old child presented pain in the right lower abdominal quadrant and fever with 39 degrees C temperature for 24 h; clinical examination showed pharyngeal erythema and local abdominal tenderness. Strep-test was positive. Abdominal ultrasound visualized signs of appendicitis. The child was operated on for complicated appendicitis. COMMENTS: The association of pharyngitis and appendicitis is particularly misleading because mesenteric adenitis is the most common cause of right lower quadrant tenderness in children with pharyngitis.     

CT can reduce hospitalization for observation in children with suspected appendicitis

Background: There are no clinical or laboratory tests that can eliminate the possibility of appendicitis in a child with abdominal pain that suggests the diagnosis. The standard of care is to admit these children to the hospital for observation. More than twice as many children hospitalized for abdominal pain suggesting appendicitis are subsequently sent home after observation compared to those who undergo appendectomy. Objective: To evaluate the ability of CT with rectal contrast medium (CTRC) to diagnose a normal appendix in children with abdominal pain. Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study in an urban pediatric emergency department. Children 6–17 years of age with abdominal pain were eligible when the attending physician planned to admit them for observation for possible appendicitis. All 94 patients underwent CTRC. CTRC results were compared to patient outcomes. Results: Ninety-four children successfully underwent CTRC. Among the 53 patients with reflux of contrast medium into the ileum, the appendix was visualized in 43 (81.1%). Among all 94 cases, the appendix was visualized in 53 cases (55.7%); 43 studies were read as normal, and 10 showed appendicitis. Of the 43 with a normal appendix, 23 were discharged home, 18 were admitted but discharged uneventfully, and two underwent surgery for another diagnosis. When the appendix was visualized, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of CTRC were 100% (95% CI 66.4, 100.0), 97.7% (95% CI 88.0, 99.9), 100% (95% CI 91.8, 100.0), and 90% (95% CI 55.5, 99.8), respectively. The use of CTRC could have decreased the admission rate for observation for appendicitis by at least 41.8% and by more than 80% when the appendix could be seen. Conclusion: Our data suggest that when the appendix can be visualized, CTRC can accurately identify a normal appendix and reduce the number of children hospitalized for observation for possible appendicitis.Presented in part at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, May 2001