End of life care

This module presents background and encourages personal reflection and learning on end of life care terminology, concepts and ethics for all healthcare staff working with adult cancer patients. Consideration is given to resuscitation issues, communication skills competence and end of life care pathways such as Gold Standards Framework and Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying.     

The effect of horticultural therapy on the quality of life of palliative care patients

Palliative care patients experience a variety of needs and perceive their quality of life as being only fair. This study adopted a single-group repeated-measure design to investigate the effect of horticultural therapy on the quality of life of palliative care patients using the Quality of Life Concern in End of Life Questionnaire. Significant differences in the domains of “existential distress” and “health care concern” were observed immediately postintervention and at 4 weeks postintervention, respectively. No other significant differences were seen in the other domains or in the total mean score of the outcome measure.     

End of life issues

Despite advances in cancer survival rates, end of life care remains a vital aspect of cancer management. The use of integrated care pathways can facilitate effective care of dying patients in a generalist setting. However, it remains important that staff are able to recognise the onset of the dying process, not only in order to make symptom control provision, but also that appropriate communication can occur with patients and those close to them. This allows the exercise of choice over place and style of care. The key symptoms at the end of life are restlessness, agitation, breathlessness, pain and noisy respiration from retained airway secretions. Ethical tensions arise from the assumptions that the use of opioids and sedatives hastens dying, but this is contradicted by available evidence.     

Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life

BACKGROUND:

Although spiritual care is associated with less aggressive medical care at the end of life (EOL), it remains infrequent. It is unclear if the omission of spiritual care impacts EOL costs.

METHODS:

A prospective, multisite study of 339 advanced cancer patients accrued subjects from September 2002 to August 2007 from an outpatient setting and followed them until death. Spiritual care was measured by patients' reports that the health care team supported their religious/spiritual needs. EOL costs in the last week were compared among patients reporting that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported versus those who reported that their needs were well supported. Analyses were adjusted for confounders (eg, EOL discussions).

RESULTS:

Patients reporting that their religious/spiritual needs were inadequately supported by clinic staff were less likely to receive a week or more of hospice (54% vs 72.8%; P = .01) and more likely to die in an intensive care unit (ICU) (5.1% vs 1.0%, P = .03). Among minorities and high religious coping patients, those reporting poorly supported religious/spiritual needs received more ICU care (11.3% vs 1.2%, P = .03 and 13.1% vs 1.6%, P = .02, respectively), received less hospice (43.% vs 75.3% ≥1 week of hospice, P = .01 and 45.3% vs 73.1%, P = .007, respectively), and had increased ICU deaths (11.2% vs 1.2%, P = .03 and 7.7% vs 0.6%, P = .009, respectively). EOL costs were higher when patients reported that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported ($4947 vs $2833, P = .03), particularly among minorities ($6533 vs $2276, P = .02) and high religious copers ($6344 vs $2431, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS:

Cancer patients reporting that their spiritual needs are not well supported by the health care team have higher EOL costs, particularly among minorities and high religious coping patients. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Nutritional support and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing palliative care

PREVOST V. & GRACH M.-C. (2012) European Journal of Cancer Care21, 581-590 Nutritional support and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing palliative care In palliative care, the nutrition provided has to be tailored to the patient's needs, enhancing patient comfort and quality of life (QoL). We conducted a literature search to review methods of measuring QoL, and modalities of nutritional intervention and their influence on QoL of cancer patients in palliative care. Original papers published in English were selected from PubMed database by using the search terms, palliative medicine, cancer, nutrition and quality of life. Specific tools that are particularly recommended to assess QoL in a palliative care setting are reviewed. The main goal in palliative care is to maintain oral nutrition by providing nutritional counselling. Enteral nutritional support showed inconsistent effects on survival and QoL. An evidence-base for parenteral nutrition is still lacking. Ethical considerations concerning provision of food and hydration in end-of-life care are discussed. Nutritional status should be assessed early and regularly during treatment using appropriate tools. In the particularly acute context of palliative care, optimal patient management requires adequate education and counselling to patients and families. Meaningful interactions between the patient, caregivers and medical team would also increase the chance of resolving nutrition-related issues and help to fulfil each patient's specific nutritional needs and thus improve the QoL.     

Radiation therapy at the end of life in patients with incurable nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND:

Receipt of chemotherapy at the end of life (EOL) is considered an indicator of poor quality of care for medical oncology. The objective of this study was to characterize the use of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the same period.

METHODS:

Treatment characteristics of patients with incurable NSCLC who received RT at the EOL, defined as within 14 days of death, were analyzed from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network NSCLC Outcomes Database.

RESULTS:

Among 1098 patients who died, 10% had received EOL RT. Patients who did and did not receive EOL RT were similar in terms of sex, race, comorbid disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of receiving EOL RT included stage IV disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐3.83) or multiorgan involvement (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.08‐2.84) at diagnosis, age <65 years at diagnosis (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.21‐2.83), and treating institution (OR, 1.24‐5.94; P = .02). Nearly 50% of EOL RT recipients did not complete it, most commonly because of death or patient preference.

CONCLUSIONS:

In general, EOL RT was received infrequently, was delivered more commonly to younger patients with more advanced disease, and often was not completed as planned. There also was considerable variation in its use among National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions. Next steps include expanding this research to other cancers and settings and investigating the clinical benefit of such treatment. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

人性化护理对恶性肿瘤临终患者生活质量的影响

目的探讨人性化护理对恶性肿瘤临终患者生活质量的影响。方法选取2009年1月至2012年1月收治的106名恶性肿瘤临终患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组。试验组给予人性化的临终护理,对照组给予常规的临终护理。比较两组患者在护理1个月后的生活质量评分情况。结果护理前两组患者的躯体功能、认知功能、情绪功能、角色功能、社会功能、疼痛、恶心呕吐、疲倦以及总体情况无显著性差异(P>0.05)。护理1个月后,试验组患者的躯体功能、认知功能、情绪功能、角色功能、社会功能、疼痛、恶心呕吐、疲倦以及总体情况均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论通过控制疼痛、姑息性治疗、心理疏导和死亡教育、建立社会支持系统和做好生活护理等人性化护理,可提高恶性肿瘤临终患者的生活质量,值得临床推广。     

End of life issues in brain tumor patients

Despite aggressive antitumor treatment, the prognosis of brain tumor (BT) patients remains poor. In the last stage of disease, BT patients present severe symptoms due to the growing tumor or to treatment side-effects, which require adequate palliative management and supportive therapy. However, studies specifically addressing palliative care and end-of-life (EoL) issues in BT patients are lacking. This study explores symptoms experienced by BT patients in the last weeks of disease and EoL issues observed in a population of brain tumor patients followed at home until death by a neuro-oncological home care palliative unit set up in our Institution in 2000. From October 2000 to December 2005, 324 patients affected by brain tumor and discharged from our Institution were enrolled in a comprehensive program of neuro-oncological home care supported by the Regional Health System. Out of 324 patients enrolled in the home care program, 260 patients died of which 169 (65%) were assisted at home until the end of life and have been included in this study. Clinical symptoms, palliative treatments and EoL treatment decisions were collected from home clinical records. Among the 169 patients assisted at home until death, the most frequent symptoms observed in the last four weeks of life were: epilepsy 30%, headache 36%, drowsiness 85%, dysphagia 85%, death rattle 12%, agitation and delirium 15%. Palliative management of brain tumor patients requires a multidisciplinary approach performed by a well trained neuro-oncology team. Development of home care models of assistance may represent an alternative to in-hospital care for the management of patients dying of brain tumor and may improve the quality of end-of-life care. An erratum to this article can be found at     

Systematic versus on-demand early palliative care: A randomised clinical trial assessing quality of care and treatment aggressiveness near the end of life

AimEarly palliative care (EPC) in oncology has shown sparse evidence of a positive impact on patient outcomes, quality of care outcomes and costs.Patients and methodsData for this secondary analysis were taken from a trial of 207 outpatients with metastatic pancreatic cancer randomly assigned to receive standard cancer care plus on-demand EPC (standard arm) or standard cancer care plus systematic EPC (interventional arm). After 20 months' follow-up, 149 (80%) had died. Outcome measures were frequency, type and timing of chemotherapy administration, use of resources, place of death and overall survival.ResultsSome indices of end-of-life (EoL) aggressiveness had a favourable impact from systematic EPC. Interventional arm patients showed higher use of hospice services: a significantly longer median and mean period of hospice care (P = 0.025 for both indexes) and a significantly higher median and mean number of hospice admissions (both P < 0.010). In the experimental arm, chemotherapy was performed in the last 30 days of life in a significantly inferior rate with respect to control arm: 18.7% versus 27.8% (adjusted P = 0.036). Other non-significant differences were seen in favour of experimental arm.ConclusionsSystematic EPC showed a significant impact on some indicators of EoL treatment aggressiveness. These data, reinforced by multiple non-significant differences in most of the other items, suggest that quality of care is improved by this approach.This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01996540).     

Enhancing life after cancer in diverse communities

BACKGROUND:

Although large numbers of cancer survivors exist in every community, including minority communities, there is a significant gap in knowledge about best practices for these patients.

METHODS:

The Community Networks Program, funded by the National Cancer Institute Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, has developed and tested unique services for these communities. These programs have used community‐based participatory research techniques under a framework of diffusion of innovation and communications theory.

RESULTS:

This article describes some specifically tailored interventions that may be useful to a wide range of providers working with the underserved.

CONCLUSIONS:

Enhancing life after cancer can be achieved in underserved communities by supplementing local resources. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the impact of sociodemographic and medical characteristics.

Population-based surveys have shown that health-related quality of life (HRQL) is influenced by patients' characteristics such as age, gender, living situation and diagnoses. The present study explores the impact of such factors on the HRQL of severely ill cancer patients. The study sample included 395 cancer patients who participated in a cluster randomised trial of palliative care. Median survival was 13 weeks. HRQL assessments (using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) were compared among subgroups of relevant patients' characteristics (ANOVA), and the significance of individual covariates was explored by multivariate linear regression. Most EORTC QLQ-C30 scores showed minor differences between genders. Higher age was associated with less sleeping disturbance, less pain and better emotional functioning. No positive impact of living with a partner was found. Performance status and/or time from assessment to death were significantly associated with most functioning and symptom scores. We concluded that although the overall impact of sociodemographic characteristics may seem less important to HRQL scores among advanced cancer patients than in general populations, age and gender should be allowed for. Performance status and closeness to death also need to be reported.     

Waiting for the platelet count to rise: negotiating care at the end of life

Oncologists play a crucial role in enabling patients at the end of life and their families to decide whether the burden of chemotherapy is worth the benefit. Using language that displays their concern for providing ongoing care and that does not mistakenly imply withholding of effective therapies can ease the transition off chemotherapy. Providing accurate, timely prognostic information; exploring patients' hopes, goals, and values; helping them resume meaningful activities; meeting their health care proxies and discussing the advance care plan with them can all enhance the relationship with patients at the end of life and ease fears of abandonment.     

Chemotherapy and healthcare utilisation near the end of life in patients with cancer

The quality of medical care delivered to patients with cancer near the end of life is a significant issue. Previous studies have defined several areas suggestive of aggressive cancer treatment as potentially representing poor quality care. The primary objective of current analysis was to examine chemotherapy and healthcare utilisation in the last 3 months of life among patients with cancer that received palliative chemotherapy. Patients were selected from the hospital administration database of the Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands. Data were extracted from the medical files. A total of 604 patients were included for analysis (median age: 64 years). For 300 patients (50%) chemotherapy was given in the last 3 months (CT+). For 76% (n = 229) of CT+ patients unplanned hospital admissions were made in these last 3 months, compared to 44% (n = 133) of CT? patients (p < .001). Visits to the emergency room in last 3 months were made by 67% (n = 202) of CT+ patients compared to 43% (n = 132) of CT? patients (p < .001). Healthcare consumption was significantly higher in patients who received chemotherapy in the last 3 months of life. Being able to inform our patients about these aspects of treatment can help to optimise both the quality of life and the quality of dying in patients with cancer.     

Association between unmet needs and quality of life in hospitalised cancer patients no longer receiving anti‐cancer treatment

Assessing the quality of life and unmet needs of cancer patients is an integral part of palliative care. This cross‐sectional study sought to determine whether there is an association between quality of life and unmet needs, anxiety and depression in cancer patients who are no longer receiving anti‐cancer treatment. The sample consisted of 93 patients from the oncology department at the University Hospital in Ostrava for whom further cancer treatment had been terminated as ineffective in halting the progression of their cancer. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30), the Patient Needs Assessment in Palliative Care (PNAP) questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used to collect data. The overall quality of life score was quite low at 46. Most unmet needs were defined in terms of physical, psychological or spiritual needs. Correlations were found between impaired quality of life and lower Karnofsky scores (r = 0.50); increased physical (r = 0.52), psychological (r = 0.44) and spiritual (r = 0.36) needs; and higher levels of anxiety (r = ?0.30) and depression (r = ?0.68). Effective management of patients' physical (pain, fatigue and depression), psychological and spiritual needs may improve their quality of life.