Apomorphine can increase cutaneous inhibition of motor activity in Parkinson's disease

We studied the effect of non-nociceptive ipsilateral digital stimulation on EMG recorded from a small hand muscle before and after the administration of subcutaneous apomorphine in 6 patients with Parkinson's disease. All were receiving the drug to control “on-off” fluctuations in motor performance. Averaged rectified EMG was recorded from tonically contracted abductor pollicis brevis (APB) following index finger stimulation using a brief stimulus train. In 5 patients motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were also recorded from APB during tonic contraction. A conditioning stimulus train was applied to the index finger at intervals between 15 and 65 msec prior to the transcranial magnetic stimulus. After apomorphine administration the patient group showed a significant increase in both EMG and MEP inhibition induced by digital stimulation. In patients with Parkinson's disease who have marked motor fluctuations, the inhibitory response of upper limb motor neurones to low level digital cutaneous stimulation can be altered by dopamine agonists.     

Crossed and direct effects of digital nerves stimulation on motor evoked potential: a study with magnetic brain stimulation

We studied the influence of contralateral and ipsilateral cutaneous digital nerve stimulation on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited in hand muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We tested the effect of different magnetic stimulus intensities on MEPs recorded from the thenar eminence (TE) muscles of the right hand while an electrical conditioning stimulus was delivered to the second finger of the same hand with an intensity four times above the sensory threshold. Amplitude decrement of conditioned MEPs as a function of magnetic stimulus intensity was observed. The lowest TMS stimulus intensity produced the largest decrease in conditioned MEPs. Moreover, we investigated the effects of ipsilateral and contralateral electrical digital stimulation on MEPs elicited in the right TE and biceps muscle using an intensity 10% above the threshold. Marked MEP inhibition in TE muscles following both ipsilateral and contralateral digital stimulation is the main finding of this study. The decrease in conditioned MEP amplitude to ipsilateral stimulation reached a level of 50% of unconditioned MEP amplitude with the circular coil and 30% with the focal coil. The amplitude of conditioned MEPs to contralateral digital stimulation showed a decrease of 60% with the circular coil and more than 50% with the focal coil. The onset of the inhibitory effect of contralateral stimulation using the focal coil occurred at a mean of 15 ms later than that of ipsilateral stimulation. No MEP inhibition was observed when recording from proximal muscles. Ipsilateral and contralateral digital stimulation had no effect on F wave at appropriate interstimulus intervals, where the main MEP suppression was noted. We stress the importance of selecting an appropriate test stimulus intensity to evaluate MEP inhibition by digital nerves stimulation. Spinal and cortical sites of sensorimotor integration are adduced to explain the direct and crossed MEP inhibition following digital nerves stimulation.     

Analogous corticocortical inhibition and facilitation in ipsilateral and contralateral human motor cortex representations of the tongue.

How the human brain controls activation of the ipsilateral part of midline muscles is unknown. We studied corticospinal and corticocortical network excitability of both ipsilateral and contralateral motor representations of the tongue to determine whether they are under analogous or disparate inhibitory and facilitatory corticocortical control. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to unilateral focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the tongue primary motor cortex were recorded simultaneously from the ipsilateral and contralateral lingual muscles. Single-pulse TMS was used to assess motor threshold (MT) and MEP recruitment. Paired-pulse TMS was used to study intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) at various interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between the conditioning stimulus (CS) and the test stimulus (TS), and at different CS and TS intensities, respectively. Focal TMS invariably produced MEPs in both ipsilateral and contralateral lingual muscles. MT was lower and MEP recruitment was steeper when recorded from the contralateral muscle group. ICI and ICF were identical in the ipsilateral and contralateral representations, with inhibition occurring at short ISIs (2 and 3 ms) and facilitation occurring at longer ISIs (10 and 15 ms). Moreover, changing one stimulus parameter regularly produced analogous changes in MEP size bilaterally, revealing strong linear correlations between ipsilateral and contralateral ICI and ICF (P < 0.0001). These findings indicate that the ipsilateral and contralateral representations of the tongue are under analogous inhibitory and facilitatory control, possibly by a common intracortical network.     

Cortical motor neuron excitability during cutaneous silent period

Objective: To investigate cortical motor neuron excitability during cutaneous silent period (CSP), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from abductor pollicis brevis following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TCM) were recorded with and without a conditioning of ipsilateral painful digital nerve electric stimulation.Methods: MEPs following TCM were recorded with and without a conditioning stimulation at an interstimulus interval (ISI) from 0 ms to 100ms in 6 controls and four patients who had reduced pain sensation in unilateral upper limbs associated with cervical syringomyelia. In addition MEPs and evoked spinal cord potentials (ESCPs) from cervical epidural space following TCM with and without a conditioning stimulation were recorded in four patients with thoracic myelopathy.Results: MEP amplitude was clearly attenuated by a conditioning stimulation at an ISI from 40 ms to 80 ms in controls (statistically significant at 60 ms). In patients with cervical syringomyelia, MEP amplitude was attenuated by a conditioning stimulation in asymptomatic hands similarly in controls but that was unchanged by a conditioning stimulation in the symptomatic hand with reduced pain sensation. In patients with thoracic myelopathy MEP amplitude was attenuated by conditioning stimulation similarly in controls, but ESCP amplitude was unchanged.Conclusions: We demonstrated that noxious cutaneous nerve stimulation suppressed spinal motor neurons but cortical motor neuron excitability was unchanged during CSP. In clinical practice, measurement of MEP suppression after noxious cutaneous nerve stimulation may provide useful information in patients with damaged pain related nerve fibers.     

Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral muscles

We studied the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex on ipsilateral upper extremity muscles in six normal men. Stimulation had inhibitory and excitatory effects on the muscles during voluntary activation. Transient inhibition, an ipsilateral silent period (ISP), occurred in all muscles tested, often without any preceding excitatory response. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) occurred ipsilaterally in the proximal muscles of some subjects. Ipsilateral MEPs and ISPs were delayed relative to the MEPs evoked by the same stimulus in the corresponding contralateral muscles. The excitability of the alpha motoneuron pool, assessed during the period of the ISP by eliciting H-reflexes, showed no change, suggesting that ipsilateral inhibition acts at a level above the alpha motoneuron. Connections from motor cortex to ipsilateral muscles could be via the corpus callosum and contralateral hemisphere or via purely ipsilateral pathways.     

Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans.

The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A-alpha and A-delta fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A-delta fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A-delta fibers that protects the hand from harm. A-alpha fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.     

Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential.

In 25 normal subjects, we studied the EMG silent period following the magnetic motor evoked potential (MEP) when the target muscle was tonically contracted (post-EMP silent period [PMSP]). In the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI), PMSP duration increased in linear proportion to stimulus intensity, but not to the size of the preceding MEP. The PMSP was longer in hand and forearm muscles than in upper arm muscles. In the FDI, PMSP was longer than the peripheral silent period (PSP) even when multiple peripheral stimuli were used to get M responses whose twitch force was equivalent to that of MEPs. Weak magnetic stimuli evoked silent periods preceded by no MEP in several subjects. Spinal alpha-motoneurons (alpha-MNs) were partially inhibited during the first PMSP portion, but later this effect recovered. MEPs due to weak electrical stimuli to motor cortex were only slightly inhibited during the late PMSP. Segmental inhibitory loops evoked by the muscle twitch and inhibitory projections descending to alpha-MNs from the cortex predominantly underlie earlier PMSP portions, but recurrent intracortical inhibition may also contribute. Later portions are predominantly due to other stimulus-related cerebral inhibitory or suppressing phenomena.     

Changes in motor cortex excitability during ipsilateral hand muscle activation in humans.

OBJECTIVES: To test whether unilateral hand muscle activation involves changes in ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) excitability. METHODS: Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the right hemisphere was used to evoke motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the resting left abductor pollicis brevis (APB) in 9 normal volunteers. We monitored changes in motor threshold (MT), MEP recruitment, intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) while the ipsilateral right APB was either at rest or voluntarily activated. Spinal motoneuron excitability was assessed using F-wave recording procedures. RESULTS: Voluntary muscle activation of the ipsilateral APB significantly facilitated the MEPs and F-waves recorded from the contralateral APB. Facilitation was observed with muscle activation >50% of the maximum voluntary force and with stimulus intensities >20% above the individual resting motor threshold. Intracortical inhibition significantly decreased in the ipsilateral M , while there was no significant change in intracortical facilitation during this maneuver. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral hand muscle activation changes the excitability of homotopic hand muscle representations in both the ipsilateral M1 and the contralateral spinal cord. While the large proportion of MEP facilitation most likely occurred at a spinal level, involvement of the ipsilateral hemisphere may have contributed to the enlargement of magnetic responses.     

Motor inhibition and excitation are independent effects of magnetic cortical stimulation.

We administered magnetic cortical stimulation (MCS) during voluntary contraction of intrinsic hand muscles to 8 patients with motor neuron disease (MND), 5 patients with pure lower motor neuron syndromes (LMN), a patient with severe subacute sensory neuropathy (SSN), and 10 healthy volunteers. Patients with MND had clinical evidence of upper MND and elevated thresholds for (3 patients) or absence of (5 patients) motor evoked potentials (MEPs). MCS during sustained contraction inhibited electromyographic activity in 6 of 8 patients with MND, without preceding MEPs. MCS had no effect on the electromyogram (EMG) of the other 2 patients with MND. In normal subjects and patients with LMN, inhibition of EMG was never seen without a preceding MEP, regardless of stimulus intensity. In the patient with SSN, MCS elicited normal MEPs and inhibited the EMG in a pattern similar to normal subjects, whereas supramaximal electrical stimulation of median and ulnar nerves failed to inhibit the EMG despite normal M and F responses. Our findings indicate that the inhibitory effects of MCS on EMG are not dependent solely on changes in afferent feedback caused by the muscle twitch produced by the MEP, or on Renshaw cell inhibition. We suggest that some of the inhibitory and excitatory effects of MCS on the motor system are mediated by distinct cortical elements, which may have different susceptibilities to pathophysiological processes in MND.     

Differential modulation of motor evoked potential and silent period by activation of intracortical inhibitory circuits.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of activation of intracortical inhibitory circuits, as tested by short interval (3 ms) paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a conditioning-test paradigm, on the electromyographic (EMG) pause (silent period, SP) following the motor evoked potential (MEP) in normal subjects. METHODS: SPs and MEPs were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle during a tonic voluntary contraction (from 70 to 90% of the maximum). Using a focal coil, we compared the SP duration after single-pulse TMS, paired-pulse TMS and single-pulse TMS of reduced intensity such as to evoke MEPs matched in size to the conditioned ones after paired-pulse TMS. In addition, we compared in a control experiment the duration of the SP following matched size MEPs evoked, respectively, by focal TMS with preferential activation of indirect I1- or I3-waves. RESULTS: SP duration after paired-pulse TMS was significantly longer than after single-pulse TMS evoking MEPs of a similar size. In no case the SP duration was longer when focal TMS preferentially activated I1-waves. CONCLUSIONS: The conditioning sub-threshold stimulus is more powerful in reducing the MEP size than in cutting down the subsequent EMG silence, suggesting that the neural circuits underlying MEP and SP are, at least in part, different.     

Pre-movement facilitation of motor-evoked potentials in man during transcranial stimulation of the central motor pathways

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following trans-cranial stimulation (TCS) through unifocal electric or magnetic impulses have been evaluated in the pre-movement period in 8 healthy volunteers. By utilizing a simple reaction time paradigm, progressive amplitude increments and latency decrements of MEPs have been demonstrated in the 100 ms preceding the onset of EMG activity in the muscle examined. By employing surface and depth recordings from various muscles of hand and forearm contralateral to the TCS, it was observed that in the 'early' period of pre-EMG facilitation (100-60 ms before EMG onset) TCS solely recruited the same low-threshold motor units which are fired first during self-paced contractions. In the 'middle and late' epochs of pre-EMG facilitation, TCS served when MEPs were recorded from a relaxed muscle, during TCS of progressively higher intensity. Multiple muscle recordings showed that pre-EMG facilitation was remarkably limited to the muscular group of the hand primarily involved in the intended movement.     

Motor potentials evoked by magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in normal subjects and patients with motor disorders.

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by magnetic coil stimulation of motor cortex were studied at rest and during maximum voluntary muscle contraction in 20 normal subjects and 42 patients with motor disorders. MEP parameters employed in this study included: onset latency, amplitude, MEP/M wave amplitude ratio and background EMG/MEP area ratio. Maximum voluntary contraction increased the amplitude of MEPs compared to the size of M waves elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation. A reduced MEP/M wave amplitude ratio had a higher correlation with pyramidal tract involvement than did a prolonged MEP onset latency. Analysis of MEP parameters may help in the differential diagnosis of cerebral infarction, ALS and cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy. The inhibitory period which follows MEPs during voluntary contraction was observed in all subjects; the mean duration in normal subjects was 126.6 +/- 29.5 msec. The mean duration of the inhibitory period in patients with cerebral infarction, ALS and cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy was 73.9 +/- 41.7 msec, 79.5 +/- 54.5 msec and 85.1 +/- 36.5 msec, respectively. These values were significantly shorter than in normal subjects.     

Impaired facilitation of motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord injury

Objectives To improve the diagnosis of damaged spinal motor pathways in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) by assessing the facilitation of lower limbs motor evoked potentials (MEP). Methods Control subjects (n = 12) and iSCI patients (n = 21) performed static and dynamic isometric foot dorsiflexions. MEPs induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation and EMG background of tibialis anterior muscle (TA) were analyzed. Static and dynamic muscle activation was performed at comparable levels of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The influence of the motor tasks on the excitability and facilitation of MEPs was compared between controls and iSCI patients. Results In the controls an increased facilitation of TA MEP at lower levels of dynamic compared with static activation (10–20% MVC) could be shown. At matched EMG background level the MEP responses were significantly increased. In the iSCI patients at a comparable level of TA activation the MEP responses were significantly reduced and 3 different patterns of MEP responses could be distinguished: i) preserved increment of TA MEP in the dynamic motor task, ii) unchanged MEP size in the dynamic and static motor task, and iii) elicitable MEPs in the dynamic motor task,which were abolished in the static motor task. Conclusions Static and dynamic motor tasks have different effects on TA MEP facilitation. The task–dependent modulation of TA MEPs is comparable to that described for upper limb muscles. Complementary to the MEP delay this approach allows for an estimation of the severity of spinal tract damage. The task–dependent modulation of TA MEPs is an additional diagnostic tool to improve the assessment and monitoring of motor function in iSCI.     

Corticospinal inhibition of transmission in propriospinal-like neurones during human walking

It is crucial for human walking that muscles acting at different joints are optimally coordinated in relation to each other. This is ensured by interaction between spinal neuronal networks, sensory feedback and supraspinal control. Here we investigated the cortical control of spinal excitation from ankle dorsiflexor afferents to quadriceps motoneurones mediated by propriospinal-like interneurones. During walking and tonic contraction of ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors while standing [at matched electromyography (EMG) levels], the effect of common peroneal nerve (CPN) stimulation on quadriceps motoneurones was tested by assessing averaged and rectified EMG activity, H-reflexes [evoked by femoral nerve (FN) stimulation] and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The biphasic EMG facilitation (CPQ-reflex) produced by isolated CPN stimulation was enhanced during walking, and when CPN stimulation was combined with FN or TMS, the resulting H-reflexes and MEPs were inhibited. The CPQ-reflex was also depressed when CPN stimulation was combined with subthreshold TMS. The peripheral (in CPN and FN) and corticospinal volleys may activate inhibitory non-reciprocal group I interneurones, masking spinal excitations to quadriceps motoneurones mediated by propriospinal-like interneurones. It is proposed that the enhanced CPQ-reflex produced by isolated CPN stimulation during walking cannot be fully explained by an increase in corticospinal and peripheral inputs, but is more likely caused by central facilitation of the propriospinal-like interneurones from other sources. The corticospinal control of non-reciprocal group I interneurones may be of importance for reducing reflex activity between ankle dorsiflexors and quadriceps during walking when not functionally relevant.     

Facilitation of motor evoked potentials by postcontraction response (Kohnstamm phenomenon)

We have applied repeated transcranial magnetic stimuli during the involuntary postcontraction muscle activity (Kohnstamm phenomenon) or during a tonic vibration reflex, both presumably arising from subcortical levels. The motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were compared with the MEPs evoked during a comparable voluntary contraction (cortical origin). The MEP amplitudes from the deltoid muscle appeared linearly related to the mean amplitude of the smoothed rectified background EMG preceding the stimulus. No differences in the facilitatory effect between voluntary and involuntary preinnervation manoeuvres were founf. If we accept the hypothesis of a subcortical origin of the involuntary muscle activity in the Kohnstamm phenomenon, the similar facilitatory effect of involuntary and voluntary background EMG supports a predominantly spinal localisation of the facilitatory mechanism in this proximal muscle both during involuntary and during voluntary activity, at least under the present conditions of rather low stimulus strengths. In about 20–30% of all the trials an extra facilitatory effect on the MEP amplitude was observed during the shortening contraction compared to an MEP elicited during the lengthening contraction, in spite of a similar background EMG. This extra facilitatory effect of the shortening contraction was observed during involuntary and voluntary preactivation, suggesting an elevated excitatory state at the spinal level.     

Effect of fatiguing maximal voluntary contraction on excitatory and inhibitory responses elicited by transcranial magnetic motor cortex stimulation

Vertex transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicited tibialis anterior motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and silent periods (SPs) that were recorded during and following isometric maximal volitional contraction (MVC). During MVC in 6 healthy subjects, MEP amplitudes in the exercised muscle showed an increasing trend from an initial value of 4539 ± 809 μV (mean ± SE) to 550 ± 908 μV (P < 0.13) while force and EMG decreased (P < 0.01). Also, SP duration increased from 165 ± 37 ms to 231 ± 32 ms (P < 0.01). Thus, during a fatiguing MVC both excitatory and inhibitory TMS-induced responses increased. TMS delivered during repeated brief 10% MVC contractions before and after a fatiguing MVC in 5 subjects, showed no change in MEP amplitude but SP duration was prolonged after MVC. This SP prolongation was focal to the exercised muscle. Silent periods recorded after pyramidal tract stimulation were unchanged following the MVC. These results suggest that MEP and SP might have common sources of facilitation during an MVC and that inhibitory mechanisms remain focally augmented following a fatiguing MVC. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Hand motor cortex activation in a patient with congenital mirror movements: a study of the silent period following focal transcranial magnetic stimulation

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have demonstrated that abnormal ipsilateral corticospinal projections are active in patients with congenital mirror movements. In addition, movement-related potentials and PET suggest that an abnormal pattern of motor cortex activation could be associated with an anomaly of the corticospinal tracts. In the present study the silent period (SP) following focal TMS was investigated in a woman with familial congenital mirror movements. Recordings were made from both the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles. When focal TMS was delivered during an intended contralateral APB muscle contraction, MEP and SP were bilaterally recorded and SP was significantly shorter than the contralateral SP observed in normal controls. An abnormal bilateral activation of the hand motor cortex can explain our findings. The non-stimulated motor cortex causes an early partial recovery of the background EMG activity when the stimulated motor cortex is still inhibited (beginning as soon as the transcallosal and the short-lasting segmental inhibition are both complete.     

Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human facial motor area: difference between upper and lower facial area.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the intracortical inhibitory and excitatory systems in the motor cortical representation of upper and lower facial muscles. METHODS: Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to 7 healthy volunteers, with the interstimulus interval (ISI) between the conditioning stimulus (CS) and test stimulus, varied from 1 to 20 ms. CS was set at 90% of motor threshold. Muscle evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from first dorsal interosseus (FDI), orbicularis oculi (o. oculi) and mentalis muscles. RESULT: TMS evoked MEPs in o. oculi on both ipsi- and contralateral sides in all subjects. In the paired-pulse study, MEP amplitude in the mentalis decreased at short ISIs of 1-3 ms, followed by increases at 12-20 ms. These effects were similar to those in the FDI. O. oculi did not show a distinct inhibitory period at short ISIs and facilitation at long ISIs was detected but was significantly less than in FDI and mentalis. In o. oculi, there was no significant difference between the effects of ipsilateral and contralateral CS on the MEPs. CONCLUSION: The bi-hemispheric control of volitional movement and the modulation from brainstem projections appear to markedly influence intracortical inhibitory and excitatory systems in the motor cortical representation of o. oculi.     

Abnormal cutaneomotor integration in patients with cerebellar syndromes: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the sensorimotor interactions in cerebellar patients. METHODS: We investigated the effects of electrical stimulation of the second (D2) and fifth (D5) fingers on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in the relaxed right abductor digiti minimi muscles of 7 patients with cerebellar syndromes and of 14 age-matched controls. The digital stimulation was set at 3 times the sensory threshold and preceded brain stimulation at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 10 to 100 ms. RESULTS: D5 stimulation produced significant MEP inhibition in normal subjects at ISIs of 20-50 ms, while D2 stimulation resulted in a non-significant inhibitory trend with the same intervals. In contrast, digital stimulation had no effect on MEP amplitude in cerebellar patients. A significant difference was found between patients and controls at ISIs of 20-50 ms with D5 stimulation. The difference in amplitude of MEPs conditioned by D5 and D2 stimulation was statistically significant between patients and controls at ISIs of 30 and 50 ms. TES conditioning induced MEP inhibition only at ISIs <40 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Digital stimulation would appear to modulate motor system excitability less effectively in cerebellar patients. MEP inhibition by cutaneous afferences is reduced in response to stimulation of contiguous, as well as non-contiguous fingers. The difference between the conditioning effects of the two fingers is also decreased, and therefore the somatotopic distribution of cutaneomotor inhibition is absent in patients. These abnormalities may contribute to the genesis of cerebellar motor symptoms and their time course suggests involvement of subcortical and cortical sites.     

Enhancement of motor cortical excitability in humans by non-invasive electrical stimulation appears prior to voluntary movement

The time course of facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial electrical stimulation delivered at varying intervals near the onset of a voluntary ballistic movement was studied in 4 normal subjects. MEPs were recorded from the left thenar muscles to unifocal anodal stimulation of the right scalp overlying the hand motor area delivered every 8-10 sec. A click, occasionally associated with the scalp stimulation (P = 0.3-0.6), was the signal for the subject to make a brief thumb press on a piston at short latency. The timing of the scalp stimulus and the click was adjusted so that the former occurred approximately between 100 msec before and 100 msec after the onset of the voluntary movement signaled by the EMG in the thenar muscles. MEPs were not detected when the scalp was stimulated 80 msec or more before onset of voluntary movement and then appeared with increasing probability as the time interval before movement shortened. The amplitudes of MEPs in the 80-40 msec period preceding movement onset were small (less than 20% of maximum) and achieved maximum values 20 msec after movement onset.