Predictive Histopathologic Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Nonpedunculated Submucosal Invasive Colorectal Carcinoma

PURPOSE Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma remain to be characterized. This study examines the relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic factors in nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma.METHODS The study cohort comprised 155 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. The clinicopathologic factors investigated included gender, age, tumor location, macroscopic type, tumor size, histologic type and grade, intramucosal growth pattern, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, degree of focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front, status of the remaining muscularis mucosa, and the depth and width of submucosal invasion.RESULTS Lymph node metastases were found in 19 patients (12.3 percent). Univariate analysis showed that lymphatic invasion, focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front, status of the remaining muscularis mucosa, and depth of submucosal invasion all had a significant influence on lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed lymphatic invasion (P = 0.014) and high-grade focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front (P = 0.049) to be independent factors predicting lymph node metastasis. No lymph node metastasis was found in tumors with a depth of submucosal invasion of <1.3 mm.CONCLUSIONS Lymphatic invasion and high-grade focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front are important predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. Depth of submucosal invasion can be used as an identifying marker for patients who do not require subsequent surgery after endoscopic resection.Supported in part by a grant-in-aid for cancer research from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan.     

Histopathologic characteristics of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis

PURPOSE: Although prognostic factors of colorectal cancer have been studied, factors associated with liver metastasis have not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to clarify the histopathologic characteristics of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective histopathologic study on 335 patients who underwent resection of colorectal cancer during 15 years. Histopathologic parameters of tumors with liver metastasis were compared with those without liver metastasis. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (12 percent) had simultaneous liver metastasis. Tumors having liver metastasis, when compared with those not having liver metastasis, were characterized by high frequency of tumor size more than 6 cm (51vs. 28 percent;P<0.01), presence of serosal invasion (98vs. 66 percent;P<0.01), lymphatic invasion (34vs. 15 percent;P<0.01), venous invasion (24vs. 3 percent;P<0.01), and lymph node metastasis (85vs. 39 percent;P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that factors independently associated with liver metastasis were serosal invasion, venous invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Accuracy in the diagnosis of liver metastasis was highest for venous invasion (88 percent) and lowest for serosal invasion (41 percent). Among 98 patients with both serosal invasion and lymph node metastasis, tumors with and without liver metastasis were different in frequency of venous invasion (26vs. 6 percent;P<0.01) and extracolic lymph node metastasis (68vs. 47 percent;P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In colorectal cancer important factors associated with liver metastasis were serosal invasion, venous invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Significant determinants for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer were venous invasion and extracolic lymph node metastasis.Presented at the meeting of The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan, July 4, 1997.     

Incidence and prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes from patients with Dukes B colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis in colorectal carcinoma is an important prognostic factor, yet the prognostic relevance of occult tumor cells in lymph nodes has not elucidated. This study was performed to investigate the correlation between isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes and malignancy potential in patients with Dukes B colorectal carcinoma and, thus, to determine whether presence of isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes has a prognostic significance. METHODS: To evaluate the incidence of isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes in patients with Dukes B colorectal carcinoma, 1,808 lymph nodes taken from 93 patients (19.4 per case) were assessed by immunohistochemical technique using a monoclonal antihuman cytokeratin (MNF 116). Clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis were compared between patients with and without isolated tumor cells. RESULTS: Isolated tumor cells were identified in 54 lymph nodes from 29 patients (31.2 percent) by the immunostaining. No correlations were observed between the incidence of positive isolated tumor cells and various clinicopathologic parameters, including preoperative carcinoembryonic level, tumor site and size, histologic differentiation, pT stage, vascular invasion and lymphatic invasion, and perineural invasion. There was no difference in five-year survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier life-table method between positive and negative groups for isolated tumor cells (82.8 and 85.9 percent, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that sex (P = 0.0236), serum carcinoembryonic level ( 5 ng/ml, P = 0.0002), and lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.0002) were significant factors in the survival time. CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemical staining with an anticytokeratin antibody is useful in identifying isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes missed in routine hematoxylin-eosin staining, but clinically it seems to be of little prognostic value in patients with Dukes B colorectal carcinoma. Thus, this immunostaining technique does not offer a significant benefit of different strategies for additional therapy or follow-up during conventional pathologic staging using hematoxylin-eosin staining.     

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer

AIM: To assess the role of computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) and establish imaging criteria of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer.METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients with early colorectal cancer were evaluated for tumor location, clinical history of polypectomy, depth of tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Two radiologists assessed preoperative CT and/or MRI for the primary tumor site detectability, the presence or absence of regional lymph node, and the size of the largest lymph node. Demographic, imaging, and pathologic findings were compared between the two groups of patients based on pathologic lymph node metastasis and optimal size criterion was obtained.RESULTS: The locations of tumor were ascending, transverse, descending, sigmoid colon, and rectum. One hundred and sixty early colorectal cancers were classified into 3 groups based on the pathological depth of tumor invasion; mucosa, submucosa, and depth unavailable. A total of 20(12.5%) cancers with submucosal invasion showed lymph node metastasis. Lymph nodes were detected on CT or MRI in 53 patients. The detection rate and size of lymph nodes were significantly higher(P = 0.000, P = 0.044, respectively) in patients with pathologic nodal metastasis than in patients without nodal metastasis. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that a cut-off value of 4.1 mm is optimal with a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 75%.CONCLUSION: The short diameter size criterion of≥ 4.1 mm for metastatic lymph nodes was optimal for nodal staging in early colorectal cancer.     

Risk Factors for Occult Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer Invading the Submucosa and Indications for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Purpose Although risk factors for histologically overt lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer have been clarified, the risk factors for occult lymph node metastasis are not clear. This study was designed to clarify risk factors for lymph node metastasis, including occult metastasis, in patients with colorectal cancer invading the submucosa and to determine the criteria for endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer. Methods The risk factors for lymph node metastasis, including occult metastasis, were analyzed in 86 cases of surgically resected colorectal cancer invading the submucosa. The lymph nodes were assessed by immunohistochemistry with cytokeratin antibody CAM5.2. Results The frequencies of overt and occult metastasis to the lymph nodes were 13 percent (11/86) and 13 percent (10/75), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed vascular invasion (P = 0.001) and tumor budding (P = 0.003) to be independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis, including occult metastasis. For tumors with submucosal invasion ≤1,000 μm, no lymph node metastasis was found. The frequencies of lymph node metastasis for tumors with submucosal invasion of 1,000 to 2,000 μm and >2,000 μm were 21 and 37 percent, respectively. In considering combinations of risk factors, there was no lymph node metastasis in tumors having neither vascular invasion nor tumor budding and submucosal invasion of ≤3,000 μm. Conclusions Vascular invasion, tumor budding, and the degree of submucosal invasion were significant risk factors for lymph node metastasis, including occult metastasis. These three factors can be used in combination to identify patients requiring additional surgery after endoscopic resection. Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (no. 15390401) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture. Presented at the Congress of Japan Surgery Society, Tokyo, Japan, March 29 to 31, 2006. Reprints are not available.     

Lymph node staging in colorectal cancer:Old controversies and recent advances

Outcome prediction based on tumor stage reflected by the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control(UICC)tumor node metastasis(TNM)system is currently regarded as the strongest prognostic parameter for patients with colorectal cancer.For affected patients,the indication for adjuvant therapy is mainly guided by the presence of regional lymph node metastasis.In addition to the extent of surgical lymph node removal and the thoroughness of the pathologist in dissecting the resection specimen,several parameters that are related to the pathological work-up of the dissected nodes may affect the clinical significance of lymph node staging.These include changing definitions of lymph nodes,involved lymph nodes,and tumor deposits in different editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM system as well as the minimum number of nodes to be dissected.Methods to increase the lymph node yield in the fatty tissue include methylene blue injection and acetone compression.Outcome prediction based on the lymph node ratio,defined as the number of positive lymph nodes divided by the total number of retrieved nodes,may be superior to the absolute numbers of involved nodes.Extracapsular invasion has been identified as additional prognostic factor.Adding step sectioning and immunohistochemistry to the pathological work-up may result in higher accuracy of histological diagnosis.The clinical value of more recent technical advances,such as sentinel lymph node biopsy and molecular analysis of lymph nodes tissue still remains to be defined.     

Pathologic Determinants of Survival After Resection of T3N0 (Stage IIA) Colorectal Cancer: Proposal for a New Prognostic Model

Purpose There is an increasing need for accurate prognostic stratification of patients with Stage II colorectal cancer to identify a subgroup of high-risk patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapies. This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic impact of a wide spectrum of pathologic parameters in a consecutive series of homogenously treated and well-characterized patients with Stage IIA (T3N0M0) colorectal cancer. Methods The study included 238 patients operated on by a single surgeon for Stage IIA colorectal tumors. The median postoperative follow-up was 110 (range, 96–120) months. At least 12 lymph nodes were harvested and examined in all the resection specimens. The prognostic value of 13 pathologic parameters, including lymph node occult disease (micrometastases) detected by immunohistochemistry, was investigated. Results Multivariate analysis identified tumor growth pattern (expanding or infiltrating; P = 0.01) and extent of tumor spread beyond muscularis propria (≤5 mm or >5 mm; P = 0.04) as the only factors having independent prognostic value. The combination of these two easily determined parameters allowed us to identify two groups of patients at low risk or high risk of tumor recurrence. The eight-year survival rates were 83.3 and 53.4 percent for the two groups, respectively. The high-risk group comprised those patients with infiltrating tumors and extramural tumor spread > 5 mm. Conclusions We propose a new and simple prognostic model to identify patients with high-risk Stage IIA colorectal cancer for whom adjuvant therapies may be justified and effective. Supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of University, Scientific and Technological Research, the Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, and the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro.     

Cancer Invasion to Auerbach’s Plexus is an Important Prognostic Factor in Patients with pT3-pT4 Colorectal Cancer

Purpose By defining perineural invasion of colorectal cancer as invasion to Auerbach’s plexus, we examined the usefulness of this pathologic finding as a prognostic factor. Methods A total of 509 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for pT3 or pT4 colorectal cancer between May 1997 and December 2001 were reviewed. All the surviving patients were followed for more than five years. All the pathologic findings, including perineural invasion, were described prospectively in the pathology report forms. Results Perineural invasion was detected in 132 of 509 patients (26 percent) and was significantly associated with lymph node status, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. Incidences of local and systemic recurrence were significantly higher in patients with perineural invasion than in those without perineural invasion. The disease-free survival of the perineural invasion-positive group was significantly poorer than that of the perineural invasion-negative group for Stages II and III colon cancer, irrespective of the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. This improved disease-free survival also was seen in patients with Stage II rectal cancer not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. There was a nonsignificant difference in disease-free survival for Stage II rectal cancer and Stage III rectal cancer treated with chemotherapy, that of the perineural invasion-positive group being poorer. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node status, perineural invasion, depth of invasion, and cancer site were significant prognostic factors. Conclusions Perineural invasion defined as cancer invasion to Auerbach’s plexus is an important prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan.     

Prognostic significance of location of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer

The prognostic value of stage of lymph node metastases was evaluated in 357 patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer. Subdivision of Dukes C patients according to the number of positive nodes revealed that the five-year disease-free survival rate (5DFS) was 63 percent in the patients with one to three nodes and 53 percent in those with four or more nodes (not significantly different). Classification according to the location revealed that 5DFS was 70 percent in those who had only local node metastases (n1+), compared with 40 percent in those who had distant node metastases along the major vessels (n2+) (P <0.001). Twelve of 38 n2+ patients had only one distant node metastasis with no local node involvement (skip metastasis). They had lower 5DFS than the n1+ patients who had three or more positive local nodes (35 percent vs. 57 percent). We conclude that the location, rather than the number, of nodal metastases has a higher impact on prognosis in colorectal cancer patients.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, May 12 to 17, 1991.     

Digestive cancer surgery in the era of sentinel node and epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Lymph node involvement is one of the most important prognostic indicators of carcinoma of the digestive tract.Although the therapeutic impact of lymphadenectomy has not been proven and the number of retrieved nodes cannot be considered a measure of successful cancer surgery,an adequate lymph node count should be guaranteed to accurately assess the N-stage through the number of involved nodes,lymph node ratio,number of negative nodes,ratio of negative to positive nodes,and log odds,i.e.,the log of the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and the number of negative lymph nodes in digestive carcinomas.As lymphadenectomy is not without complications,sentinel node mapping has been used as the rational procedure to select patients with early digestive carcinoma in whom nodal dissection may be omitted or a more limited nodal dissection may be preferred.However,due to anatomical and technical issues,sentinel node mapping and nodal basin dissection are not yet the standard of care in early digestive cancer.Moreover,in light of the biological,prognostic and therapeutic impact of tumor budding and tumor deposits,two epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related phenomena that are involved in tumor progression,the role of staging and surgical procedures in digestive carcinomas could be redefined.     

Lymph Node Metastases of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in the Mesorectum in Patients With Adenocarcinoma or Villous Tumor of the Rectum With Collision Phenomenon in a Single Lymph Node: Report of Five Cases

PURPOSE Lymph node involvement is the most important prognostic factor when staging patients with rectal cancer. Cancer originating from sites other than rectum rarely may metastasize to the mesorectum. We report five patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma to mesorectal lymph nodes, with the collision phenomenon in one lymph node. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was clinically unsuspected in two cases.METHODS We examined three cases of primary adenocarcinoma and two villous tumors with high-grade dysplasia (patient age range, 52–74 (mean, 63) years) of the middle or lower third of the rectum. All patients underwent low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision and colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. We used a manual technique for lymph node detection after overnight fixation in 10 percent formalin. All lymph nodes identified (range, 15–32; mean, 21 nodes per patient) were examined histologically.RESULTS Of 106 lymph nodes examined, 20 contained metastases: 9 from rectal adenocarcinoma, 10 from prostatic adenocarcinoma, and 1 with metastatic foci from both tumors. The diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma was readily confirmed by immunostaining for prostatic-specific antigen, and prostatic acid phosphatase.CONCLUSIONS Mesorectal lymph node dissection provides prognostic information in rectal cancer, but careful examination may reveal other unsuspected pathology. Immunohistochemical staining is an essential tool in distinguishing the origin of a lymph node metastasis, especially when the histology does not look typical for rectal carcinoma. Moreover, these observations highlight the connection that can exist between mesorectal lymph node drainage, and extra mesorectal lymph nodes drainage.Reprints are not available.Presented at the meeting of European Association of Coloproctology, Erlangen, Germany, September12 to 14, 2002.     

Prognostic factors in early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Opportunities of observing patients with recurrent early gastric cancer are rare. Assessment of prognostic factors for the recurrence of early gastric cancer is important for determining adequate strategies for managing early gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: Clinicopathologic variables were compared in 8 patients with and 453 without recurrence who were followed for over 5 years after curative resection. Expression of mutant p53 and Ki-67 was evaluated in 16 patients with n2 or above. RESULTS: Eight patients died of gastric cancer with recurrence. There were no inter-group differences in mean diameter, histologic classification, patterns of infiltrating growth, or cancer-stroma relationship; but macroscopic appearance, depth of invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion and lymph node metastases were significantly more frequent on univariate analysis in those with recurrence. Lymph node metastases was an independent prognostic factor by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. In patients with n2 or above, mutant p53 expression was higher in recurrent than in nonrecurrent cases. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node metastasis was the only independent prognostic factor for the recurrence of early gastric cancer. The expression of mutant p53 may be an indicator of recurrence in patients with n2 or above.     

Hepatic lymph node involvement in resected cases of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis in the hepatoduodenal ligament is known as one of the most significant prognostic factors after liver resection for colorectal metastasis. However, there have been very few articles on the clinical features of node-positive patients and on detailed distribution of positive nodes. Further, there has been no established strategy on how to handle hepatic lymph nodes during liver resection. To address these subjects, a retrospective study was conducted. METHODS: During the period of 1980 through April 1998, 182 hepatic resections were performed for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Of these, 78 cases had hepatic lymph node sampling during the operation. Distribution of positive nodes, location of liver metastasis, stage of the primary lesion, and outcome after liver resection were analyzed. RESULTS: Nine cases (12 percent) had secondary lymph node metastases in the hepatoduodenal ligament. The incidence was slightly higher (13.5 percent) in the most recent 44 consecutive cases. There was a tendency for liver metastases in the right lobe to metastasize to No. 12b (or node of the foramen of Winslow, lymph nodes along the common bile duct) and liver metastases in the left lobe to metastasize to No. 8a (anterosuperior group of the lymph nodes along the common hepatic artery). Outcome of node-positive patients (n=9) was extremely poor (P<0.001) compared with that of node-negative patients (n=66), and the most common site of recurrence in the node-positive patients was remnant liver and hepatic lymph nodes. Preoperatively, there were no significant predicting factors for positive hepatic lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: No. 8a and No. 12b nodes are principal nodes that should be palpated and sampled during liver resection to check the secondary lymphatic spread from liver metastases. Hepatic nodal involvement indicates the progression of disease beyond simple liver metastases and may not be the indication for simple surgical removal. Further study, including hepatoduodenal dissection and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, may elucidate the survival benefit, if any, of liver resection in node-positive patients.     

Metastasis of primary gallbladder carcinoma in lymph node and liver

AIM: To evaluate the patterns with metastasis of gallbladder carcinoma in lymph nodes and liver. METHODS: A total of 45 patients who had radical surgery were selected. The patterns with metastasis of primary gallbladder carcinoma in lymph nodes and liver were examined histopathologically and classified as TNM staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients, 29 (64.4%) had a lymph node positive disease and 20 (44.4%) had a direct invasion of the liver. The frequency of involvement of lymph nodes was strongly influenced by the depth of the primary tumor (P= 0.0001). The postoperative survival rate of patients with negative lymph node metastasis was significantly higher than that of patients with positive lymph node metastasis (P= 0.004), but the postoperative survival rate of patients with Nl lymph node metastasis was not significantly different from that of patients with N2 lymph node metastasis (P= 0.3874). The postoperative survival rate of patients without hepatic invasion was significantly better than that of patients with hepatic invasion (P= 0.0177). CONCLUSION: Complete resection of the regional lymph nodes is important in advanced primary gallbladder carcinoma (PGC). The initial sites of liver spread are located mostly in segments IV and V. It is necessary to achieve negative surgical margins 2 cm from the tumor. In patients with hepatic hilum invasion, extended right hepatectomy with or without bile duct resection or portal vein resection is necessary for curative resection.     

Curative Resection of T1 Colorectal Carcinoma: Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis and Long-Term Prognosis

PURPOSE The features of T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma and the risk determination of lymph node metastasis were reviewed. Prognostic factors were assessed to verify whether the risk of lymph node metastasis would influence the long-term prognosis.METHODS Patients undergoing curative resection of T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital from December 1969 to August 2002 were retrospectively studied. Patients with synchronous colorectal cancer, distant metastasis, familiar adenomatous polyposis, or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. The associations between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated univariately using chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, or Student’s t -test, and multivariately using logistic regression. Univariate analysis by the log-rank test and multivariate analysis by Cox regression hazards model determined the factors influencing the overall survival.RESULTS A total of 159 patients were included. Sixteen patients (10.1 percent) had lymph node metastasis. The risk of lymph node metastasis included histologic grade (P = 0.005), lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.023), inflammation around cancer (P = 0.049), and budding at the invasive front of tumor (P = 0.022). Age (P = 0.001) and number of total sampling lymph nodes (P < 0.0001) were found to be the factors influencing the overall survival.CONCLUSIONS Variables that predict lymph node metastasis in surgically resected T1 colorectal carcinoma may not impact the long-term prognosis.Supported by a grant from the Research Foundation of Taipei Veterans General Hospital.     

Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis is an important indicator of tumor stage and prognosis in pT1 and pT2 colorectal adenocarcinomas. Lymphovascular invasion is an established risk factor of lymph node metastasis, whereas budding at the invasive front of tumors is also reported to correlate with lymph node metastasis. We examined whether the coexistence of lymphovascular invasion and budding provides any better information than lymphovascular invasion alone in the prediction of lymph node metastasis of pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Surgically resected specimens of 101 pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas were studied. Using sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin, we examined lymphovascular invasion and budding according to Morodomis definition. RESULTS: Lymphovascular invasion was present in 39 lesions (38 percent), whereas budding was found in 42 lesions (41 percent). Budding was more frequently detected in pT2 tumors than in pT1 tumors. The presence of budding significantly correlated with lymphovascular invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of lymphovascular invasion alone for lymph node metastasis were 79, 76, 34, and 96 percent, respectively, whereas those of the combination of lymphovascular invasion and budding (either lymphovascular invasion or budding) were 93, 52, 24, and 98 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Because the risk of lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas having neither lymph node metastasis nor budding is very low, budding in combination with lymphovascular invasion seems to be a simple and inexpensive pathologic marker in predicting lymph node metastasis. Therefore, the presence or absence of budding should be examined in the routine pathologic diagnosis of pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas.     

结直肠癌淋巴结转移相关因素的研究进展

结直肠癌淋巴结转移受多种因素的影响,众多因素之间相互联系、相互作用,临床工作中需对各种因素综合分析才能正确地做出诊断和治疗,本文查阅近十年关于结直肠癌淋巴结转移的相关因素的文献,初步总结了目前被普遍认同的影响结直肠癌淋巴结转移的相关因素,为研究结直肠癌淋巴结转移的独立因素提供思路。目前认为肿瘤的浸润深度、原发部位、分化程度、病理类型以及患者的术前血清CEA水平等与结直肠癌的淋巴结转移具有相关性。而肿瘤的大小和大体形态等因素与结直肠癌淋巴结转移是否具有相关性,目前的认识还不一致。造成以上研究结果出现差异的原因可能有:不同学者对于患者选择的差异、样本数量的多少以及采用的标准不同等。     

颈部淋巴结转移与甲状腺乳头状癌的治疗及预后

颈部淋巴结转移在甲状腺乳头状癌中较为普遍.尽管颈部淋巴结转移可独立预测甲状腺乳头状癌的复发,但其对于肿瘤预后的影响仍有争议.预防性中央区淋巴结对甲状腺乳头状癌患者的价值尚不清楚,尤其是术前无颈部淋巴结转移的临床或影像学证据时.对于存在危险因素的甲状腺乳头状癌患者,如男性、年龄大于45岁、肿瘤直径＞4 cm、多灶性和甲状腺外侵犯以及BRAF基因突变阳性等,术前应认真评估颈部淋巴结,必要时可行预防性中央区淋巴结清扫.     

Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in t1 stage colorectal Carcinomas

Purpose Selective endoscopie resection may cure early colorectal cancer (Tl), but the management is controversial. There is concern about the small risk of lymph node metastasis, which will not be treated by endoscopie resection alone. The authors sought predictive markers of lymph node metastasis to assist patient management. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases of Tl stage colorectal cancer resected using endoscopie resection or bowel surgery over the period 1979 to 2000. The risk of lymph node metastasis was analyzed using logistic regression model for the markers selected by univariate analysis: the type of initial treatment, depth of submucosal invasion, lymphatic channel invasion, differentiation of histology, and invasive front histology. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients were available for study. Twenty-one had lymph node metastasis. Depth of submucosal invasion (2 2,000 yum) and lymphatic channel invasion significantly predicted risk of lymph node metastasis in multivariate analysis. When these two factors were adopted for the prediction of lymph node metastasis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100, 55.6, 15.6, and 100 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Depth of submucosal invasion and lymphatic channel invasion were accurate predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. These two factors could be used in selecting appropriate cases for surgery after endoscopie resection. Poster presentation at meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Diego, California, June 2 to 7, 2001.